Rhonda Garelick, an English professor at the University of Nebraska, has a comment on John Galliano’s outburst in a Paris bar (“High Fascism“; NYtimes, 3-7-2011). Garelick can’t resist finding Galliano’s behavior symptomatic of fascist/Aryan tendencies deeply rooted in French culture—despite the fact that Galliano was fired and now faces persecution for uttering a racial insult. (Of course, one might argue that these recent events simply indicate the triumph of the culture of critique in post-WWII Europe.) The French are evil because during the German occupation, French women continued to dress fashionably:
“Every woman in Paris is a living propaganda poster, the universal function of the Frenchwoman is to remain chic,” wrote one fashion journalist in the early 1940s. “Frenchwomen are the repositories of chic, because this inheritance is inscribed in their race,” wrote another.
That’s not the worst of it:
And as Vichy continued to toe the Nazi line about Aryan physical fitness, more French fashion magazines began focusing on exercise and diet for women.
Ah, the horrors of National Socialism, encouraging women to eat well and be physically fit.
But even more horrifying than physical fitness, these Aryan standards of beauty are still with us. After all, who won the war anyway?
And although we insist on the racial diversity of fashion’s current standards of beauty, the fascists’ body ideal has persisted and expanded far beyond Europe. The hallmarks of the Nazi aesthetic — blue eyes, blond hair, athletic fitness and sharp-angled features — are the very elements that define what we call the all-American look, still visible in the mythic advertising landscapes of designers like (the decidedly non-Aryan) Ralph Lauren and Calvin Klein.
This is a fairly routine exercise emanating from the highest reaches of the mainstream media expressing Jewish hatred and revenge seeking against Whites and especially Nordic-looking Whites. One is tempted not to make too much of it except that the issue of physical beauty and health goes to the heart of the long conflict between Jews and non-Jews over the construction of culture. There is a long history of Jewish hostility to Western concepts of physical beauty, going back to the war of the Macabees against the Greeks commemorated at Hanukkah. The standard Jewish interpretation is that it was a rebellion against the Greek concept of physical beauty as a value in itself, as opposed to Jewish “holiness” as the ultimate virtue (which, being a bit cynical, I would parse as group commitment). Especially abhorrent to the Jews was the Greek practice of honing their bodies in gymnasia.
Tom Sunic has written extensively about this topic for TOO: “The Artful Race“ and his 5-part series, “Beauty and the Beast.” The ideal of Aryan physical beauty was an aspect of 20th-century racial science, and during the National Socialist period there was a revival of classical art:
Numerous German sculptors worked on their projects while benefiting from the logistic and financial support of the National Socialist political elite. Their sculptures resembled, either by form, or by composition, the works of Praxiteles or of Phidias of ancient Greece, or those executed by Michelangelo during the Renaissance. The most prominent German sculptors in the Third Reich were Arno Breker, Josef Thorak, and Fritz Klimsch….
The Wave/Die Woge, Fritz Klimsch, 1942
In “The Artful Race” Sunic mentions the Frankfurt School as dedicated to subverting Western images of physical beauty–a theme also of Elizabeth Whitcombe. (My chapter on the Frankfurt School discusses a different kind of subversion of the healthy: family life. Children with strong ties to their parents and a sense of pride in their families are said to be forerunners of fascism and anti-Semitism.) Lasha Darkmoon illustrates the subversion of the beautiful by Jewish critics and art collectors in her ”The plot against art“). And Michael Colhaze juxtaposes images of women by Lucian Freud and Sandro Botticelli.
Garelick’s little article is in the tradition of Jewish antipathy toward the physical beauty of Europeans and for the value that Europeans place on physical beauty. I suspect that these traits of Europeans are an aspect of European individualism. Peter Frost has argued convincingly that there was sexual selection for traits like blond hair and blue eyes (Peter Frost, “European hair and eye color: A case of frequency-dependent sexual selection?“ Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2006) 85–103). This means that traits like blond hair and blue eyes were seen as sexually attractive—like the peacock’s tail, so the became more common in the population because they were sought after in mates. Frost associates sexual selection among Europeans with monogamy as a marriage system, selected for in the northern areas where Whites evolved because of the need for fathers to provision children. Rather than marry on the basis of known kinship relations and family dictates, marriage is based on individual choice. And one criterion of importance (among others) is physical beauty.
Such selection pressures would also lead Europeans to value love as the basis of marriage–analysed as a trait that makes close relationships between spouses mutually rewarding. John Murray Cuddihy remarked on how love was seen as foreign by Jews emerging from the ghetto, resulting in theories like Sigmund Freud’s where love was analyzed as repressed sexuality—little more than a neurosis.* Nor was physical beauty in marriage partners valued among Jews. A passage in the Talmud says that physical appearance was not to be a critical resource for a woman: “For ‘false is grace and beauty is vain.’ Pay regard to good breeding, for the object of marriage is to have children.” Instead of personal attraction, arranged marriages were common into the modern era.
Hence the culture clash exemplified by Garelick, abetted by Jewish historical grudges against the West.
And as for why White standards of beauty still predominate, there’s still quite a few of us around who appreciate the aesthetic exemplars of our race and we buy stuff. Try selling clothes with Lucian Freud-type models.
*This is the passage from Chapter 4 of CofC, p. 138:
Although high-investment parenting was an important aspect of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy, conjugal affection was not viewed as central to marriage with the result that, as Cuddihy (1974) notes, a long line of Jewish intellectuals regarded it as a highly suspect product of an alien culture. Jews also continued to practice consanguineous marriages—a practice that highlights the fundamentally biological agenda of Judaism (see PTSDA, Ch. 8)—well into the twentieth century whereas, as we have seen, the Church successfully countered consanguinity as a basis of marriage beginning in the Middle Ages. Judaism thus continued to emphasize the collectivist mechanism of the social control of individual behavior in conformity to family and group interests centuries after the control of marriage in the West passed from family and clan to individuals. In contrast to Jewish emphasis on group mechanisms, Western culture has thus uniquely emphasized individualist mechanisms of personal attraction and free consent (see PTSDA, Ch. 8).
What Will Work, Part 5--Conclusion
What Will Work, Part 5
The Failures of Enoch Powell
Whites Do Not Have the Right
Jewish Dissidents Target Putin
Pondering a Pundit: Minette Marrin in the British Establishment
Charlie, Say It Ain’t So
At work recently a loathsome Jewish co-worker was on the war-path about two new blonde Aryan female co-workers. Both were blonde, attractive, and I found their high girlish voices to be ‘cute’. However Mr. Jew was annoyed to no end, stating he couldn’t stand to be around them.
Apparently the mere presence of Aryan Beauty is a physical reminder/ manifestation of the fact that the Jew, dark and swarthy is indeed not of a Chosen People for if that were True, why are so many Jews physically repulsive with dark beady eyes, hooked noses and squat rounded heads??
In glancing through sales catalogs and magazines I’ve noticed the standards for models have dropped toward the once unthinkable: rather than the gorgeous white blond with a great skin and fetching smile, now the standard seems to be a half-starved mulatto with a hard look completely devoid of any femininity. Sadly it’s a look and attitude far too many of our white girls have taken on, without realizing that’s it’s costing them them the affection and protectiveness they naturally most want, and men naturally most want to give. The result is divorce and single parent children.
“However Mr. Jew was annoyed to no end, stating he couldn’t stand to be around them.”
Sounds like sour grapes. He was angry that they weren’t into short, stout, swarthy men with receding hair lines, moobs, and hair bristling from their ears and nostrils.
It is what one ‘d call the Bathroom Mirror Syndrome.
Mr. Jew wakes up every morning, faces the medicine cabinet and hopelessly sighs, “Oh gevald! Another day ahead of me at being a Jew.”
And there’s nothing they can do about it. So they take it out on Whites.
And though they comport discreetly cool about it, they are chomping at the bit to marry a shikse.
Personally, I like women with dark hair and green eyes.
You ought to like me then. Raven hair down to my waist and eyes like chips of green jade. Panther Lady, they call me.
Not too happy with that last line.
If anyone can improve on it, feel free! (MK)
Dark hair and green eyes wouldn’t necessarily mean non-Aryan; most Iranians share the traits you mention, but many look as European as any German or even the Nordic peoples…Indo-European. The Jews want Whites to have blind hatred of anything even remotely associated with the Iranians, forgeting of course that our histories are more intertwined than many realize.
My mum & dad both have blue eyes, my two brothers inc’ me have blue eyes, but my sister has green eyes and blonde hair! What does that mean?
I kinda find it hard to believe that there is such a thing as a totally pure Aryan race. Obviously there’s been race mixing, but does that really matter? Isn’t it more important that even people who are non-Aryan looking choose our side, feel that they are Europeans? If we limit who can be called “Aryan” then most of us probably wouldn’t qualify. I’ve seen pictures of Iranian woman with blinding green eyes – very, very good looking.
I reckon Mariam K looks a lot like that fat slob in the second picture! lol :)
TT
I have green eyes and dark hair. I get compliments all the time. I am a mix of Celtic, Germanic, and Latin. :)
There once was a lass named Mariam K.
with eyes that gleamed like chips of Jade
All down her back
lay a mane of black
The source of many comments made.
Depends how old you are
@ Jimmy Marr
My response:
Inspired, huh?
@ RememberVienna
Depends how old you are.
Early thirties, 5’9″, marathon runner.
I love the “Galloway Look” – dark hair, blue eyes, and very White skin.
@Miriam K I might be a little too young for you I’m in my mid-twenties. But if your’e in the Northeast it might work haha.
Always remember the fourteen words of our religion:
“THAT THE BEAUTY OF THE WHITE ARYAN WOMAN WILL NOT PERISH FROM THE EARTH“
Kmac’s writing continues to soar ever higher.
Magnificent.
Love how references to other TOO pieces are incorporated. I remember throwing LD’s The Plot Against Art at everyone I knew who I thought could remotely relate to it without even mentioning the JQ. Imagine their surprise!
We must engage in a concerted effort to get the word out about this website to the right places.
Kmac’s writing continues to soar ever upward.
Magnificent.
I remember throwing LD’s The Plot Against Art at everyone who I thought could even remotely relate, not even mentioning the JQ. Imagine their surprise!
We must make a concerted effort to get the word out about this website to the right places.
It seems Galliano is the latest casualty in the ongoing war against free speech. This time it was for words mumbled while drunk on a cafe patio, allegedly said in response to aggressive (Israeli?) hecklers. So much for “vive la France libre”. Coco Chanel was similarly blackened and scrutinized for having an affair with a Nazi during the Vichy period.
Kevin MacDonald once again highlights a subject that is almost never discussed but is readily visible to anyone who cares to notice: the vilification of beauty and the exaltation of the ugly. There are overt and covert forms of this propaganda inculcated in the collective mindset by way of Hollywood brainwashing, in addition to the general devaluing of virtue in all matters of public life. In movies, the unlikable homely Jewish protagonist (a la Seth Rogen or Woody Allen) always seems to be paired with an attractive, tall, usually blonde woman. Combine this with endless portrayals of blondes as either dumb, mean, or shallow and voila: you have the Jewish revenge fantasy in a nutshell. Movies are even given titles like “Legally Blonde”. In the art world, only art works which explicitly or implicitly critique or mock the great art of the past are eligible for the current canon. Crudity, prurience, and inanity have replaced beauty, mystery, and order. On a more positive note the works of Van Eyck, Botticelli, and Rodin remain where they are and are not disappearing anytime soon.
Have you ever seen “Legally Blonde”? It’s a delightful movie. Reese Withersppon is absolutely wonderful. The “dumb Blonde” stereotype is completely over-turned. The blondes, in this flick, are grogeous, sexy, kind, highly-functional, and very very very very smart.
Super Smart! Oooohhh!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0250494/
Have you ever wondered why these psycopaths are so obsessed with depopulation and creating DNA databases? What’s the point to collecting DNA information if they’re planning to kill more than 90% of the population? This is an article about DHS introducing a new portable DNA screener this summer.
http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov
/ng_20110224_1299.php?oref=topnews
DNA screeners, like the TSA radiation scanners and verichip implants, make no sense unless seen in the context of a larger agenda.
Through centuries of interbreeding with aryans, cosmetic surgery, rhinoplasty jews strive to become more aryan looking. But jews don’t want to just LOOK aryan they want to BE aryans.
Their goal is to genocide the white race and destroy and degrade us genetically through interracial marriage/breeding, vaccines, genetically modified foods, radiation, poisons in food, water, and air, etc., while stealing and implanting our DNA so they will be the new aryan master race once the old aryans have been eliminated.
Oh I get the satire. Cuz any concern with the future of Whites and their continuing dispossession in the US and Europe is just crazzzzzzzy. Nice try.
before hitler and nazis, there was a 10th century Arab traveler his name is ibn Fadlan, he described the Rus “swedish tribe in russia” as:
“I have seen the Rus as they came on their merchant journeys and encamped by the Itil. I have never seen more perfect physical specimens, tall as date palms, blond and ruddy; they wear neither tunics nor caftans, but the men wear a garment which covers one side of the body and leaves a hand free. Each man has an axe, a sword, and a knife, and keeps each by him at all times. The swords are broad and grooved, of Frankish sort.”
so does this mean this Semite is an aryan supremacist?
Galliano seems to have a Spanish heritage (father Juan, mother Anita, Gibraltar&Spain). And possibly jewish. So the french connection is a bit vague.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1363144/John-Galliano-rehab-fighting-obsession-Jewish-routes.html
while the total number of jews in the iberic penninsula at the end of the middle age was 170.000 the muslims (arabs and north african, berbers) were 3-4 million people…and you cannot stand to face the truth..that 99% of the converted christians that actually live in the modern Spain and Portugal are their descendents whom did not go back to north africa shores with their ruler …the only group who migrated back were the muslim state personel who was ruling the area…and the jewish that chose not return to Morocco went further to the northern states of Europe..and they did retain their faith and group racial traits along with them..
The Gene Map of Europe clearly shows that Iberians are extremely similar to the French. So unless you want to make the claim that the French are also massively descended from Berbers, what you’re saying makes absolutely no sense.
and the jewish that chose not return to Morocco went further to the northern states of Europe..
The Jews of Iberia overwhelmingly were sent to Turkey, not Morocco or the northern states of Europe.
The proto-Ashkenazi ancestors of northern European Jews broke off from the Seraphic Jews before any Jews were expelled from Iberia.
Galliano has lived most of his life in the UK. His education is 100% British. Garelick does not appear to consider facts to be important when crafting her message of racial hate. She doesn’t like the French at the moment, therefore Galliano is French. This is typical of Hebraic ‘scholarship’.
I might not be a completely qualified judge of this – since I stopped watching TV out of utter disgust over 15 years ago, but during the last few years – I’ve had two prolonged stays in a hospital and was trapped in a room with a TV and not much else to do to pass the time. During those two experiences, I immediately noticed that prime time TV programs were featuring a massive increase in the number of non-white characters, far out of proportion to their population percentage – were pushing race mixing between white females and usually black males, and I also began to notice a strange absence of white male characters who had blond hair and fair, Aryan-looking appearances. In fact, on the rare occasions where a blond haired white guy was cast in a role, it was almost always in the role of a demonic, sexual deviant and criminal serial killer or other sort of bad guy role.
No accident, friends. The enemy we face has no level to which they will not stoop, in order to spew their venom and hatred for White European people.
“I also began to notice a strange absence of white male characters who had blond hair and fair, Aryan-looking appearances.”
You are correct. Most of the white male characters have large hooked noses, auburn colored afros, dark eyes, completely out of proportion to their true numbers in the population. Not a blond hair nor blue eye in the lot.
Luke do not worry your assessment is 100% accurate.
It has gotten to the point where I as well do not watch tv anymore but rather us it as an Xbox accessory.
(However there are some ‘diamonds in the rough’ so to speak, the show ‘Charmed’ features 3 attractive White actresses (Alyssa Milano, Rose Mcgowan, and Holly Marie Combs) and is about the only thing to come out of Holly-weird lately that actually depicts White Females decently (it should be noted that all three sisters marry in the end and yes I do have a crush on Alyssa Milano! )
I agree, the Robert Redford/Ryan O’Neal/Van Johnson look is a thing of the past…unless you need Nazis for a WW2 flick. The thing is, the few jews (or half jews) who fit this look somewhat back then (Paul Newman and Kirk Douglas) were THE most popular jewish actors of their day. Owen Wilson is the only prominent current actor who’s conspicuously blond, and he’s cast in goofy comedies. I suspect that there are a lot of wasp actors out there dying their hair black.
Now the women, that’s another story. Long blond hair is just too alluring for jewish producers and directors to ignore.
Beware of the Mossad agent on this site
The number of intelligent posters this site has now managed to attract is truly awe-inspiring. Kevin MacDonald must be pleased. The level of debate here, I find, is exceptionally high.
People who read the main article, but don’t have time to read the Comments, are missing out on a wealth of specialist information.
Even the Zionist trolls have formidable intellects and have managed to dupe many others into thinking they are genuine White Nationalists.
For sheer guile and Machiavellian cunning, however, none can equal the Jewish Supremacist who has succeeded in pulling the wool over the eyes of the crème de la crème of this commentariat.
“Miriam K” has somehow contrived to pull off the near-impossible feat of conning these brainy eggheads into thinking she is no more than a satirical spoof writer.
Fellow posters, beware of this fiendishly clever femme fatale. She uses humor and honeyed words to wind her way into your good graces. She is pure poison — probably a Mossad agent.
The Mossad – the most overhyped intelligence agency in the world. A great beneficiary of the jewish gift for PR, and press influence. They would be partially believable but for the fact that they oversell it. I guess they are insecure about how they would perform against an equally outfitted opponent.
She is not a “Mossad” agent. That’s ridiculous. Mossad agents probably cost a fortune to commission. She may or may not be Jewish, but in any case, even stating ideas contrary to our beliefs to “make a point” is hurtful. Imagine, for instance, what someone who does not know the “secret” of Miriam thinks when they read her comments.
If she is a Jew than we should not censor her. However, she should have to admit it. And if she is a clever white nationalist, then she can be clever by knowing more, not by being sneakier.
Gravitas says:
Nonsense, you old curmudgeon! Miriam wouldn’t hurt a fly. Thank God there are a few intelligent posters on this site who have a sense of humor and can recognize a pisstaker.
Dweeb, er, Anonyma,
I do have a measure of sympathy with your own position – to a point, mind you – that the present and lamentable station of we Europeans cannot ultimately be laid at the webbed, bescaled feet of the Joos. You Jews, inveterate middlemen of dirt-merchantry, could hardly be expected to have the power to take from us our masculinity – which is all that in the end will save us. A ruling caste for all time unto the end of time you would be? Hah! You could not even be expected to tie your own civilizational shoe laces, as it were, save for our expert help. You build nothing, but labor to destroy everything? Oh, yes! To remove you from our midst, and place you safely where no harm may come to you nor those you would injure, a finer day’s work I do not imagine being done. But why would we do that, and not, you know, the Other Thing? Because we are better men than you, as you should know. And what a pity it is that you cannot constitutionally know that, or you would not act as you do. But that is to be your tragedy, and at long last none of ours.
P.S. Who taught you how to write, Dweeb? Knock the fucking lead out.
@ Captain Chaos
Dear Cap’n, I respect you enormously and accept most of your arguments on most things. In fact, I regard you as one of my mentors on this site. But please do understand that I am NOT Dweeb nor am I Jewish.
The fact that I am one of Miriam’s supporters does not make me a Jew. Quite a few bona fide posters on this site (e.g. Anglo Saxon, Pierre de Craon, Arthurdecco etc ) also think Miriam is no more than a satirical spoof writer. We are not all Jews, are we?
And just because Dweeb writes good English and I write good English, you conclude we have to be the same person! What kind of logic is that?
standard Jewish interpretation
I found the link above KM gives to the rabbi especially interesting, read from my own point of view and what I believe I’ve learned from life. First, the jews apparently have a real gift for being able to fashion a strength from what begins as a weakness; if your race is ugly then you value “being holy”. And hence superior.
If your self-interest demands you harm others, then you, not the other, are the “real” victim, because he has “forced” you to do so. There’s also a similarity here to the practice of some American Indians who supposedly asked the animal’s forgiveness before they killed it. At any rate, the idea here is to maintain the “high ground” no matter what you’re doing.
Third, and I think most important, behind all the “holiness” is the idea of rejecting “fate” in favor of actually DOING something to change it. More than perhaps anything else this probably explains why the jews have always had a quenchless quest for power at all times and places; with these three tools the door is always open to them. That historically it has always brought them to a bad end ultimately seems to have escaped them; but after all, they are God’s Chosen People and their religion tells them to expect adversity until the final triumph.
It is essential to us, I believe, to understand they have simply discovered the relevant natural laws and use them. They don’t own them; they can be used by anyone. If we won’t then we have no one to blame but ourselves.
“The idea of rejecting fate” is known as hubris. Our ancestors learned long ago such hubris was disastrous.
This is one of the greatest character flaws of the Jew and nothing to be admired – even if it appears to be proactive.
How Rachel Zoe Became Hollywood’s Most Powerful Fashion Player
What does Zoe (born Rachel Zoe Rosenzweig) make of the spate of anti-Semitic remarks? “It’s a little insane and super-sad,” she says. “Anti-Semitism, racism or any prejudice is not something I tolerate. I’ve fired clients because they were anti-Semitic, or anti-everything, except what they were. … I’ve known John Galliano and his boyfriend for years. I don’t know enough about it to make a clear statement, but if it’s true, it’s tragic.”
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/how-rachel-zoe-became-hollywoods-165967
I don’t know the background behind Galliano’s remarks, but 99 out of 100 times, the “anti-semite’s” remarks are justified and the self-righteous charge of “anti-semitism” specious.
It’s comic watching people who overwhelmingly support a nation that openly tramples upon the rights of its minority citizens and kills its neighbors in the name of its “god,” get their knickers twisted over words.
Maybe the liberals are beginning to strike out a little, having seen so many of their former allies joining the neocon “ other side”. This a hard line coming from France which is considered anti-zionist. Don’t let poodles forget who’s in charge.
About 30 years ago some anthropologist noted that people tend to mary those who have a similar body type.
Mesmorph with mesomorpth (average build, athletic), ectomorph with ectomorph (skinny, Fred Astaire) and endomorph with endomorph (pudgy, Peter Ustinov).
This is explained as seeking to be able to get a double advantage in raising a child with two copys of your body type genes, your copy and your spouses indentical copy.
If developing a co-worker or other aquaintance with the idea that they have a rational reason to select for partners with similar genes, this is a way to get the principal across with a non-controversial example before getting them to internalize the idea that they should also select for racial similarity.
Presentng them with the racial selection part might best come weeks later, not in the same converstaion.
I think it’s very interesting to observe how the media and “the establishment” today is laying siege on white peoples concept of beauty. It’s almost deemed racist to say you are attracted to only white girls and blondes especially. When I was a teenager in the 90s I was actually feeling somewhat guilty for not being attracted to non whites. Sweden is extreme in the amount of indoctrination through school and TV though when it comes to promoting minorities and mix race relationships(white female, black male ofc) but I’m sure it’s very similiar in other countries.
It really was bizarre, born in the northern part of Sweden, at the time one if not the most ethnic white part of the earth and being made into feeling like “an evil racist” for not being attracted to arabs and blacks which at the time started to pour into my country.
Luckily I woke up as I grew older, it’s sad though to see what is happening in Sweden of today. A country of 9 million atm with about 15% of the population born outside the country, 1% born in Iraq. In short 100 000 people immigrate each year since 1990 when the massimmigration got started. It’s jsut crazy, take a group like somalis for example, Sweden constitutes 0,7% of the population of OECD countries but take in more then 26%of all somalis heading for OECD(2009 stat).
Well hopefully things can get better in the future, not going to give in to the defeatist attitude . Sorry for going abit off topic by the way.
Swed31 wrote:
“Well hopefully things can get better in the future, not going to give in to the defeatist attitude . Sorry for going abit off topic by the way.”
Good for you. If you want to do some activism, I suggest going to http://www.whiterabbitradio.net and watching the “mantra” genocide video.
The genocide mantra is scarry for the globalist. I posted it on the Kansas City newspaper site yesterday. It was up for about an hour when suddenly the paper took down the whole thread.
I imagine at least a couple or three ordinary white people read it, could not but have been struck by it, and when they tried to come back to the thread later, probably understood that the paper took the thread down for the un PC nature of the mantra.
Thus a couple more white people now have a personal realization of the Orwellian nature of the world they live in.
And most importantly, if you aren’t already a member of an organized local group of people that you get together with off the web, then find one and join.
The Mantra has been translated into over 20 languages.
The Mantra
Everybody says that there is a RACE problem. Everybody says that this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into ever white country and only into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan , but no one says that Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by brining in millions of third worlders and quote “assimilating with them.”
Everybody says that the final solution for this RACE problem is for every white country and only white countries to assimilate, i.e, intermarry with all of these non-whites.
Now what if I told I if there was a RACE problem and this RACE problem would only be solved if hundreds of millions of non-blacks where brought into every black country and only into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize that I am not talking about a RACE problem, I am talking about a final solution to the black problem?
And how long would it take for any sane black man to notice this? And what kind of a psycho black man would not object to this?
But I tell the obvious truth about the on going program of genocide against my race, the white race
and liberals, respectable conservatives all agree that I’m supposedly a NAZIwhowantstokill6millionJews.
They say they are anti-racist but what they really are is anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, Latin America for Latin Americans, white countries for everyone.
John Galliano could be called a ‘half White’ as from his mother side, he is North African Berber (Spanish) Jew. Israelites (as Dr. Shlomo Sand believes that ‘Jews’ were only invented a century ago) are know for their hatred towards Jesus, Mary and Christians. They were persecuted by the ‘White Christians’ for centuries and expelled from almost every European country. However, no a days, it’s the ‘White Christians’ like Murdoch and Conrad Black who glorify the Jews. Americans and the Westerners love to elect Jew-slave politicians as their leaders – and the laws in those countries protect Jewish rights while persecute the non-Whites especially Muslims.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/john-galliano-irks-jewish-groups/
I don’t think Galliano is on the record as claiming to have had a Jewish mother. Instead it seems there’s a hearsay report that he claims to have Jewish ancestry going back to the 19th Century.
This article could have easily been sub-titled “Beauty and the Beast”, or “Envy morphs into malevolence”.
Not one white in twenty has classic Nordic features. Most of us are a mix of various ancestries and you can find wildly different physical traits in the same immediate family (and that’s fine with me!).
I see Mrs Garelick is working on a biography of Coco Chanel. I wonder what KM’s line on her (Coco) is – her fashions were certainly intended to express ideas, but Nietzschean ones. I’m drawing this from the film Coco before Chanel. I think that was a betrayal of Europe in its own way, Christian Europe that is. I can imagine how boring Mrs Garelick’s book will be though, if her article is anything to go by – affair with a German officer, tut tut, a collaborator, hissss, etc, whilst this and that was happening and everyone in the world was being so nice to the Germans…
Galliano claims he has “jewish roots.” The implication is he’s a descendant of spanish converso jews. Galliano is a gay fashion designer superstar. The fashion industry is run by jews and just like in Hollywood, they select their own ethnic for advancement. Galliano’s “jewish roots” are deep enough into the past that he can ‘pass’ as a jew OR gentile whenever it serves his interests. Now that he’s been accused of anti-semitism he’s reclaiming his hidden jewish roots.
We’ve just seen Charlie Sheen provide a similar example. Accuse a crypto of anti-semitism and the previously hidden jews come crawling out into the open.
“First, the jews apparently have a real gift for being able to fashion a strength from what begins as a weakness; if your race is ugly then you value “being holy”. And hence superior.”
Homely girls have been doing the same forever. They can be pretty aggressive, mean and self-righteous, too. I guess Jews have elevated the homely girl’s survival tactics to those of the group. It’s not uncommon for homely girls to take on pretentious intellectualism, either.
Tom
I’ve known a few ladies too who, though much lacking in physical beauty, were so completely feminine they had great attractiveness. I won’t attempt to define it but I think we all know what it is.
You all are probably going to hate me for this. But I find Jewish women highly attractive. If I could somehow convert one to Christianity and marry her, I would totally do it. I find them bookish, and something about that voice is appealing. Of course, the entire being sneaky femininists who would sell you out in a second for a few bucks tends to detract from all that glamour. But maybe if a Jewish girl could be converted first, then she would be as nice to me as she is to her racial brothers.
So you want your kids to lack the ability to identify with anything that your parents and grandparents are?
If you really are fixated on those physical characteristics, there are beautiful Maronites with green eyes.
“You all are probably going to hate me for this. But I find Jewish women highly attractive. If I could somehow convert one to Christianity and marry her, I would totally do it. I find them bookish, and something about that voice is appealing. Of course, the entire being sneaky femininists who would sell you out in a second for a few bucks tends to detract from all that glamour. But maybe if a Jewish girl could be converted first, then she would be as nice to me as she is to her racial brothers.”
Never mind that a lot of their “racial brothers” can’t stand them. That’s why so many of the highly-paid Hollywood execs eventually make their way to good looking goyim. Even a Jewish 10/10 such as Sarah Silverman can’t seem to keep a man that long. There’s very little attractive about Jewish women, intellectually or physically. Anyone naive enough to think the opposite just hasn’t been exposed to them enough and should hang out on JDate or a large synagogue long enough to be cured.
Sarah Silverman is a 10? I don’t think they’ve produced anything close to a 10 since Hedy Lamarr.
@ Hans
So what’s wrong with Golda Meier?
http://www.takegreatpictures.com/app/webroot/content/2010_images/2006/07/31/Golda_Meir.jpg
Or Madeleine Albright?
http://0.tqn.com/d/jewelry/1/0/z/d/91239577.jpg
Or Gertrude Stein?
http://0.tqn.com/d/lesbianlife/1/0/O/E/GertrudeStein.jpg
To correct the balance, however, consider these eye-poppingly gorgeous Jewesses:
Supermodel Michelle Tractenberg:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ITWI9nTWaek/SMzsvr-IUaI/AAAAAAAAD08/1Ag14Ouy14E/s400/20080912-michelle-1.jpg
And consider this scorcher, supermodel Bar Refaeli, whose beauty is positively Aryan:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_kIjrfODffSA/TQjjhdrhXoI/AAAAAAAAB3E/WJbTWDYFlHo/s1600/model_bar-refaeli_1.jpg
Yikes! That picture of Golda Meier looks like LBJ in drag.
Jewish girls are NOT “nice” to their racial brothers. They all hate each other. It’s ONLY about raising the next generation of hatchlings. After the next brood is born – they go their seperate ways.
Why do you think Jewesses figure so prominently in “femimism” and “psychology”? These were vanity gigs, set up by thier spouses, in order to destroy the Gou – but mainly to get their Jewish wives out of the house, and inflict their harriden misery on the rest of the world. The Jewish male then had lots of free time to chase Shiksa skirt.
In addition – every Goy male, married to a Jewess, is the ABSOLUTE slave bitch of the female. You will obey her UTTERLY, and without question. Every time. I have not ever not seen it NOT happen.
So good luck, Coward.
Rhonda Garrick’s article is not actually talking about high fashion but about the models used in fashion. A female model with noticeably ‘sharp angled features’ ( a masculine characteristic) is masculine , not Aryan. And indeed top models are not particularly nordic looking – but they are strikingly masculine (see HERE . One recent model feted by the fashionistas is a man. Fashion’s ultimate insult to women.
Greek practices in gymnasia were just that, I think the Jews had a point there!
By my way of thinking Breker, Thorak ect. portrayed women with rather massive physiques (incredibly broad shoulders for example). I am reminded of the comic book superheroes in the (thoroughly Jewish) comic book industry.
In the linked paper blonde hair and blue eyes are hypothesized to be attractive because they are rare. Cameron Diaz’s (or Heidi B.’s) eyes are unusual:-
So there never was a race of blonds.
It’s the (very Jewish) cosmetics industry that promotes unattainable images of beauty and (bleach) blonde hair.
You very much miss the larger point of MacDonald’s brief but fine essay – a topic which fully deserves to be expounded upon till the last Aryan draws their final breath. Not that I would expect you to get it, as you are not of our people and so have, cannot have, any genuine regard for them. It is to do with the kind of love that facilitates our very being into the morrow. Love amour. In that love experienced as verily manna from heaven it is the wont of the lover to witness his/her beloved as carnal ideal – and to wish to be perceived as such by his/her beloved. This is Nature’s gift to we Europeans.
Now, all that MacDonald could have said but did not, yet it was implied if only unintentionally as it is intrinsic to what he wrote about. Which is to say, and as MacDonald did (I dare say consciously) imply with his repeated use of the subliminal barb “Aryan,” we will never in the end submit to the extinguishment from this earth of the eternal recurrence of our type – of ourselves – for then we would have taken from us everything. It is simply vileness incarnate that is the Jewish millenarian drive to blend all Man into one and lowly form fit for swine to rule. We do not expect swine to know pearls when cast before them.
P.S. It must pain the Jews to know that Aryans are their betters in what Jews do best – verbalization. By way of example, contrast my own ability with that of Dweeb Engel.
Off topic (but relevant to the topic).
Meet the Jew:
http://jezebel.com/#!5687873/the-man-behind-thedirtycom-is-just-as-awful-in-person
They don’t just hate beauty. They hate humanity. They hate vulnerability. I was immediately reminded of this:
“–The Jews are the most remarkable people in the history of the world, for when they were confronted with the question, to be or not to be, they chose, with perfectly unearthly deliberation, to be at any price: this price involved a radical falsification of all nature, of all naturalness, of all reality, of the whole inner world, as well as of the outer. They put themselves against all those conditions under which, hitherto, a people had been able to live, or had even been permitted to live; out of themselves they evolved an idea which stood in direct opposition to natural conditions–one by one they distorted religion, civilization, morality, history and psychology until each became a contradiction of its natural significance.”
From The Anti-Christ by Friedrich Nietzsche
That Jew previously earned his money by:
“Alias used approximately 1998-2004 in “Stroke and Run” schemes. The idea was to approach music artists with a golden (almost impossible) deal and use their hunger for fame and fortune. When every dollar had been squeezed, the artist was abandoned in pursuit of a new victim.”
http://dirtyscottsdalediscovered.blogspot.com/
How can he sleep at night?
I guess that may help explain why Jews with better physical appearances look like they have more European ancestry than usual.
If whites are guilty of “fascism” by their physical characteristics at birth, it makes them more conveniently dispossession-ready.
The blonde blue eye will always be the favored, over all others. My biology teacher told me it’s due to the genes that are recessive will always come out. Last week I was in the Carribean, there I saw many negroes with green and blue eyes, however they live in squalar. Hair color and eye color don’t make a superior being. European genes do on occasion produce the raw material to make a highly developed individual. No matter how many negroes play sports, become president, they will always be apes. I have met some bright coloreds, however they have an admixture of European breeding, which for them is a cruel curse as they can see the reality, which we also see.
Bohemianh:
Another white? person shooting themself in the foot.
With friends like you the white race don’t need enemies.
When you call people apes, be sure to include yourself…unless of course you ascribe to the “Gods chosen people” theory. In which case you need to be exposed as a Zionist.
FYI, we don’t need a seperate homeland because we are different….but because we are the same, The fact that I need a house of my own doesn’t mean I am better than my neighbor, because he also needs a house of his own…Its a Natural Law
And you need only remember that those gymnasia were filled with naked boys to see how this meditation on the age-old Judaic hatred of beauty dovetails nicely with their culture-distorting homophobia, as explored by the late Alisdair Clarke and currently myself on my own blog.
For the same reason, I dissent from this bit about ‘love’ and “love marriages,’ which is bourgeois nonsense. Traditional Aryan civilizations knew better than to mix love, a pleasant diversion at best, a debilitating madness at most times, with the serious business of marriage and reproduction. Reproduction, as Alain Danielou points out in numerous works, impacted society [viz, the race] and hence required strict supervision [viz, the caste system and arranged marriage]. Where reproduction was impossible [male on male or female on female; or slaves who could not inherit] the state had no interest.
HENCE the tolerance, or glorification, of homosexuality, and HENCE the great heights of Traditional Aryan cultures.
Remember: it is the NEOCONS who promote “Family Values.”
Only an English professor could believe that she has the ability to argue away visual allure with words.
I wonder what this woman looks like? I’m tempted to say she comes across like a class nerd telling everyone how shallow the cheerleaders are (jealousy.) But I actually think she comes across more like a recovering alcoholic telling the world how horrible whiskey is (obsession.)
Google her image. Could be worse. But she appears to dye her hair. Blond/brown with black roots. Hmmm. Guess she want to look Aryan. Ahhh, that patina of nazism makes a yenta feel powerful.
She’s a self -described fashion critic and is writing a book about Coco Chanel. My guess is that, like a lot of women, she’s obsessed with a visual aesthetic that she never quite possessed herself, regardless of her ethnicity. (All cloaked in feminist condemnation, of course.)
Sha says, “And although we insist on the racial diversity of fashion’s current standards of beauty, the fascists’ body ideal has persisted and expanded far beyond Europe. The hallmarks of the Nazi aesthetic — blue eyes, blond hair, athletic fitness and sharp-angled features….”
The “fascists’ body ideal”…yeah, I guess nobody really liked tall blonde women until the fascists came along.
John Galliano is not the only one hunted by the Jewish Lobby. It has just forced the Jewish President and CEO of the National Public Radio (NPR), Vivian Schiller as result a trap set by Zionist Christian filmmaker James O’Keefe for NPR’s executive Ron Schiller, who was recorded on hidden tape saying: “The Tea Party’s members are nothing but a bunch of “weird evangelical kind of movement. the group is ‘fanatically involved in people’s personal lives and very fundamental (radical) Christian – I wouldn’t even call it Christian. Basically, they believe in white, middle America, gun-toting – it’s pretty scary – They’re seriously , racist, racist, people”.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/11/zionist-lobby-%e2%80%98thou-shalt-not-talk-ill-of-me%e2%80%99/
I know you Muslims are enamored with far-left Jews b/c you think your interests align. Probably reminds you of the good old days in the Ottoman Empire when you worked together to rape, despoil, and humiliate as many Christians as possible.
But I strongly suggest that you really look at what these far-left people stand for, and what their ultimate plans for you might be.
Far-left Jews saying that they support Muslims is like me saying that I support gays in the military… of Pakistan.
Also, I’d like to see an article from the powers that be about what is happening in Wisconsin (and Ohio and Indiana) right now. The media is flooding the airwaves with images of aggrieved white people, who are being portrayed as Middle America, who are being brutal and stripped of their rights by the Republican Party.
Now it’s possible that both parties are two sides of the same coin completely, and the govs. of those states are taking marching orders from NY banks–but surely they don’t want to commit political suicide. Something subtle is going on here to promote the Marxist notion that “we” are the poor whites, blacks, and hispanics being exploited by rich WASPs, rather than what most people naturally feel, that “we” are whites who are being stripped of wealth and the possibility of economic/social/political advancement by minorities.
Chechar:
I like these “Fouteen words” better, and they are more to the point:
“We must secure a place for our people and a future for our children”
Since they are both David Lane quotes it is a matter of preference :-)
My theory on the (universal?) preference for light skin:
As far as I know, (which may not be that far) EVERYONE finds lighter skin more beautiful. It is an evolved instinct to fear the dangers of night, when hunters are about. Over time by means of various learning mechanisms, people began to associate darkness with danger and evil.
I designed a word/color and color/word association test for a paper in psychology class and guess what?..
There was NO statistically significant difference between the responses of the three races measured (whites, blacks, and browns) Regardless of race, when asked for the first word that popped up upon hearing the word “good” the responses were predominantly “Mother” “white” etc. on hearing the word “bad” they all responded with “man” “death” “father” “Black” etc.
This shed some light on why (sexually) more white women date black men than white men date black women.
It also is evidence, as if any were needed, that all people are “prejudiced” in that they all prefer white to black.
Thus the white man who prefers to date a white woman is no more prejudiced than the black man who exhibits that very same preference.
Moreover, you can see it every day in the movies, tv, etc. The black hero will be married to a VERY light-skinned black woman…so much for whites being “prejudiced”
Also, the famous “good doll” “bad doll” experiments where Black girls as young as three were shown a black doll and a white doll and asked which doll was “good”, (they all chose the white doll) is imo an indication of instinctual mechanisms at work.
Historically, black has been the symbol of evil, at least in western culture. Is it any wonder that the forced mixing of black and white has destroyed not just white identity, but for all practical purposes the whole culture, Marriage, religion. economy, even sexual identity is being lost. As is evident by the modern acceptance of homosexuality
That makes sense.
Though I also think that the Aryans were probably more advanced than the Dravidians in India so power and prestige were associated with lighter skin.
The ancient Han in China–if they looked like modern people around the Yangtze river (and parts of the Yellow)– also were lighter than either the Mongols to the north or the Yue (who became Cantonese) to the south… and they also built the more advanced civ.
@ Henry Baxley
It also is evidence, as if any were needed, that all people are “prejudiced” in that they all prefer white to black.
You ought to have mentioned skin whiteners. This would have proved your point more effectively. The greatest consumers of skin whiteners are the Indians.
Enough said.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/skinwhitening-adverts-ignite-race-row-in-india-863936.html
As you might expect, the politically correct Indian feminist makes tut-tutting sounds at the use of skin whiteners in India, somehow managing to suggest that women who use skin whiteners are “racists” suffering from the delusion that there’s something intrinsically “superior” about the color white.
By the way, it’s mentioned in the article that 60% of Indian women have recourse to skin whiteners.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/skinwhitening-adverts-ignite-race-row-in-india-863936.html
I think it not without significance that the mere promotion of skin whiteners in India is enough to “ignite a race row.”
There appears to be a definite resentment among darker people everywhere that white folk are stealing a march on them in the beauty league.
One way of ruining the beauty of the White race and stealing the white from their complexions is, of course, to encourage interbreeding.
Ironically, this is also the most effective way of providing a cheap, natural, and universal skin whitener for the darker races.
Everyone now becomes a nice shade of homogenous brown and no one needs to envy anyone else’s fairer complexion any more!
However……….
There will still be ONE fair race left on earth in which interbreeding is strongly discouraged. Eugenics will be practised here to a high degree and interbreeding with the darker races regarded as the ultimate crime.
Yes, you’ve got it: among the Ashkenazi Jews of Israel, America and Europe!
We alone, the Ashkenazi Jews, will end up being the White race.
All other Whites will have sunk without trace into the melting pot of multiculturalism.
Roll on the day!
Just watch us Jews then…as we grind you low-IQ, brown-skinned lumpengoyim under our triumphant heels!
I haven’t had a chance to read the entire thread – but that doll experiment was just replicated in China. Chinese tots, that have NEVER experienced “racism”, or seen a White in person, still chose Caucasian blondes are the “most beautiful”.
It’s inborn. No matter how much the Jealous Jew snarls..
White skin and blond hair reflect light. Blondes are literally luminous. Creatures of light. We’ve all seen young White children. or young White adults – their skin seems to glow from within. The Human Eye (and the eye is the outpost of the brain) seeks light. Always has. Always will.
The Jews cannot change this. No one can.
This video I saw today, by an old American industrial company that has transitioned to high technology, depicts a multi-ethnic future devoid of blue eyes/blonde hair. The only caucasion in it is a fashion designer who seems homosexual. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cf7IL_eZ38
Is the software now set to place every second comment I individually may make on “moderation”? Or is some manner of sentience resting with finger on the switch? I know the intention cannot be to cheat the readership of my rarefied commentary. Just asking, Mr. “Moderator”. With all due respect (all respect due, that is).
I like the captain, and would ask the moderator to stop moderating him. He needs no “moderating”, rarefied comments or not.
I wonder if this helps explain the Jewish/feminist rage against beauty and the so-called “objectification” of women. This has been true going back to Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, all the way through to the author of ‘The Beauty Myth’, Naomi Wolf.
All of these Jewish women are furious about the male appreciation of female beauty and they promote the idea that it can be “overcome” with proper cultural conditioning.
Many so-called “feminists” are in fact Lesbians, and as such, resent men coveting the object of their desires. jmo
You’d be angry too if you knew that genetics had doomed you to look like a hairy Saddam Hussein by the time you reached your 40th b’day.
Miriam K;
You bring up some very excellent points, one of which never even occurred to me, namely the desire to be whiter being one of the drivers of multiculti. thank you.
As for your comment about Jews inheriting the earth, heres what hitler had to say on the subject, more or less;
“Any people that will not fight for their existance don’t deserve to exist”…more power to ya!
This is an important article. Thanks. It’s such a broad topic.
Beauty is a zero-sum game where if the looks of one group’s gender is enhanced other groups’ gender attractiveness will be diminished. I see the struggle over the concept of beauty as being in part a form of sexual competition. If we as individuals are to be seen as attractive in the part of the mind that associates beauty with society’s standards (the part that can override natural instinct at times) we must see positive and sexy portrayals of people who look like us in the media (e.g. the arts). Such positive perceptions enhance our looks/status in the minds’ of the opposite gender and facilitate the creation of sexual relationships.
Miriam K, March11 5:29 AM, asks “so what’s wrong with Golda Meir…with Madeleine Albright…with Gertrude Stein?” Ugh…ugher…ughest…that’s what’s wrong!
I used to have lots of Arty Farty pals, back in the Days of My Wasted Youth. I knew tons of homosexuals. I’ve witnessed PLENTY of vicious homosexual verbal attacks – which tend to be viciously funny.
Galliano’s little drunked episode was nothing. I’ve heard much worse. He wasn’t even warmed up. He was being almost friendly….tsk tsk….This will have blowback on Jewry – as the Arty types love clothes, and art. Galliano’s clothes are GREAT.
It was nice of Roseanne Barr to take time out of her busy schedule to pose for the Lucien Freud “painting.”
Seriously though…..all the nose jobs, skin lightening creams, color contacts, hair straightening, eye surgery for Orientals, lip thinning, skin bleaching, etc. I believe its been said here before how non-Whites always express their “beauty” by trying to look like US. All the shining examples of non White women held up as “beautiful” by the media are trying their darndest to look White.
“Actress” Natalie Portman is very important for the chosen ones self esteem, especially for the female Hebrews. The Israeli born Portman, while still displaying certain jew physical characteristics, is definitely a cut above the usual full blooded jewess stars in the looks department. Certainly not a Streisand or Bea Arthur type.
Its important for the jews to have Portman to push forward and promote as if to say, see we can (almost) look as good as you White goyim. No wonder Portman just won the Oscar.
Yeah, Natalie Portman is pretty hot. I wish she would come out with a sex tape. I might temporarily give up my aversion to pornography to watch it.
I think part of Aryan beauty’s magic comes from the enormous backing it gets from the media. And are we really attempting to make a claim to racial superiority on the basis of looks? Personally, I think a lot of Caucasion women are completely beautiful. But most are worthless, since the role of a woman is to be the head of the feminine side of a family. They are not supposed to be as relevant as they are today in community politics. American women, at least, fail miserably in their traditional role.