Raleigh, N.C. — A revamped version of a long-running battle between telecommunications companies and North Carolina cities that have started their own broadband Internet offerings returned to the General Assembly on Thursday.
The House Finance Committee debated a bill that would create new requirements for cities and towns to build their own broadband networks. House Bill 129 calls for all municipal telecom providers to follow the same local, state and federal regulations as private companies and to pay an amount equal to the taxes that a private telecom provide would pay.
Existing municipal networks, such as one Wilson spent $28 million on four years ago, would be exempt from parts of the bill. The requirements also wouldn't apply to communities where at least half of residents don't have access to private broadband services.
"Our intent was never to harm the cities that are currently in the business," said Rep. Marilyn Avila, R-Wake, who sponsored the bill.
In addition to Wilson, Salisbury, Laurinburg, Morganton, Davidson and Mooresville run their own local telecommunications networks.
"They've committed their citizens to some terrific debt for these services," Avila said.
Telecom providers and some municipalities have argued annually in recent years over who has the right to sell high-speed Internet service. Cable and phone companies argue municipalities have financial advantages that they can't compete with, while cities say telecom companies aren't extending super-fast Internet at reasonable prices, putting rural areas behind in the wired world of commerce.
"What this is is Time Warner Cable's efforts to cut out municipalities as a potential competitor, and it is a monopolistic bill from the word go," said Rep. Bill Faison, D-Caswell. "We still have people who are largely under-served throughout many areas in our state."
Time Warner Cable officials denied allegations that the company was trying to squelch competition.
"The bill is intended to create a level playing field so, If local governments want to provide commercial retail services in direct competition with private business, they can't use their considerable advantages unfairly," the company said in a statement.
Wilson has about 5,600 customers for its broadband service, and an outside consultant estimates that both city and Time Warner Cable customers have saved more than $1 million because of the competition.
The Finance Committee didn't give final approval to the bill, which still faces debate in the full House and Senate if it makes it out of committee.
Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries. Read our guidelines.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
I am lucky in one way that by building provides internet for us, but cable is WAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYY out of reach for a lot of us here, we make do with the rabbit ear thing. However our internet is 54.0mps
March 17, 2011 4:43 p.m.
ive been forced to use time warner and their monopoly for 10+ years and the price has never dropped, only increased, yet i still have the same service i had 10 years ago... you would think cost would go down over time for things but nope, not when greed is the main driving force. and now they are greedy in wanting to make everyone play on a level playing field? isn't that socialism? why do i have to pay extra for no reason if i live in one town than if i live in another.. your forcing me to pay for product A more than the product is worth because someone else sells product B for higher? lack of common sense...
GOLO member since February 4, 2010
March 17, 2011 1:00 p.m.
March 17, 2011 12:28 p.m.
March 17, 2011 12:09 p.m.
Crony capitalism at its finest!
March 17, 2011 12:04 p.m.