<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive: How Google&#8217;s Algorithm Rules the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 05:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dlokeshseo seo</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-13976</link>
		<dc:creator>dlokeshseo seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-13976</guid>
		<description>excellent article , got good information about google .How google is working and improving there business.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent article , got good information about google .How google is working and improving there business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-13494</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-13494</guid>
		<description>you know, i ranked 1st position first page on yahoo, and it got me 50 visits a day, on google it would be 10000, not impressed with yahoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, i ranked 1st position first page on yahoo, and it got me 50 visits a day, on google it would be 10000, not impressed with yahoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-12934</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-12934</guid>
		<description>Google just comes up with so many </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google just comes up with so many</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drupal web development</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-12395</link>
		<dc:creator>drupal web development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-12395</guid>
		<description>I thing Google not having a standard algorithm, day to day little bit changes will happen. so every one update the information regularly..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thing Google not having a standard algorithm, day to day little bit changes will happen. so every one update the information regularly..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-12280</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-12280</guid>
		<description>Google may do it right and may do it best. But especially when it comes to its autocomplete and instant features google search is first of all a new form of normalisation: Find what the majority of people is looking for, not you! Find what makes you spend time and money, not what makes you learn and think. Just try a search query with every letter of the alphabet: What comes to your mind first? Compare this to who owns the alphabet on google.com: http://www.autocomplete.org/218/english/who-owns-the-alphabet/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google may do it right and may do it best. But especially when it comes to its autocomplete and instant features google search is first of all a new form of normalisation: Find what the majority of people is looking for, not you! Find what makes you spend time and money, not what makes you learn and think. Just try a search query with every letter of the alphabet: What comes to your mind first? Compare this to who owns the alphabet on google.com: <a href="http://www.autocomplete.org/218/english/who-owns-the-alphabet/" rel="nofollow">http://www.autocomplete.org/218/english/who-owns-the-alphabet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julin Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-12232</link>
		<dc:creator>Julin Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-12232</guid>
		<description>As Google is constraining the Rules and Regulations, to stop the spammers.It will be too difficult for the seo professionals  for target the links for building. 

http://www.globaltruckdealer.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Google is constraining the Rules and Regulations, to stop the spammers.It will be too difficult for the seo professionals  for target the links for building. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.globaltruckdealer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.globaltruckdealer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-11653</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-11653</guid>
		<description>Now this was agreatl article, thanks! Search is impacting how consumers shop due to the down economy seeking the best value. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this was agreatl article, thanks! Search is impacting how consumers shop due to the down economy seeking the best value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-11654</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-11654</guid>
		<description>Now this was agreatl article, thanks! Search is impacting how consumers shop due to the down economy seeking the best value. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this was agreatl article, thanks! Search is impacting how consumers shop due to the down economy seeking the best value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Medaris</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-11618</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Medaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-11618</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pointless to have other good options if Google has the best there is. Google has everything because they do it right (and have a lot of money to chuck into a fire... but mainly they do it right). Granted, just like every other corporation, they make mistakes and get greedy at times. But Google isn&#039;t bad, it may become so one day, but it isn&#039;t now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pointless to have other good options if Google has the best there is. Google has everything because they do it right (and have a lot of money to chuck into a fire&#8230; but mainly they do it right). Granted, just like every other corporation, they make mistakes and get greedy at times. But Google isn&#8217;t bad, it may become so one day, but it isn&#8217;t now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Server</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/comment-page-2/#comment-11595</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Server</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stag.wired.com/magazine/?p=3442#comment-11595</guid>
		<description>Thanks wired for the update. Google is great.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks wired for the update. Google is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
