THE HILL
 

Palin: 'We need much greater cuts' than in GOP spending plan

By Jordan Fabian - 03/11/11 07:15 AM ET

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) on Thursday criticized congressional Republicans' spending plan as too tepid, saying it runs the risk of alienating a GOP base hungry for steep cuts.

Asked to rate the performance of Republicans in Congress on cutting spending, the potential presidential candidate said the party must push for "much greater cuts," mentioning Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) proposal to cut $500 billion in one year, to significantly pare down the nation's projected $1.6 trillion budget deficit.

"I'm kind of embarrassed for some of the GOP — for them to be assuming that the American public believes that this is a serious discussion when we're only talking about $54 billion [sic] in cuts that they have on the table," she told Fox News's Sean Hannity Thursday night. "We need much greater cuts."

Palin's comments are a shot across the bow of Republican leaders in the House and Senate, who pushed for a bill that would cut a total of $61 billion from current spending levels. The Senate failed to advance the plan and did not approve a Democratic bill that would have cut more than $6 billion, leaving lawmakers at a stalemate over how to fund the government and avert a government shutdown. 

Democrats, who control the Senate and the White House, have encouraged Republicans to meet them in the middle on a spending proposal, arguing they have moved toward the GOP position. But Palin suggested that compromising on spending cuts, one of the main pillars of Tea Party groups that helped Republicans take control of the House in 2010, could carry political risks.

"They need to be bold and strong and they need those steel spines," Palin said of Republicans. "And they need to keep Americans believing that the GOP principles will be able to be  those things, when they're plugged in appropriately, to get the economy back on the right track.

"We're going to lose faith in the party if we just take these little, tiny baby steps -- you know, a million here, a billion there — to start ratcheting down a $14 trillion debt," she added.

"If that takes a fight, hopefully the GOP leadership is willing to fight for America's future."

The 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee played a significant role in the 2010 midterm contests, becoming a Tea Party favorite while raising large sums of money for her political action committee and endorsing candidates nationally. In all, 19 of her endorsed candidates won House races and six claimed victory in Senate contests.

As for her own political future, Palin said she would likely wait until other candidates officially jumped into the race before making a decision whether to run.

"Thinking along those lines is unconventional for me, because I have never waited for anybody else to line up and then I jump in at the end," she said. "But in this case, because it is so monumental and so affecting on a family, I probably would wait to see who is willing to put their name forward in the hat who are willing to serve this country."

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/148897-palin-we-need-much-greater-cuts-than-gop-proposal

Comments (78)

It appears that Palin also doesn't know how bills get passed in Congress. After they pass the House, they must pass the Senate and be signed by the President. The GOP can pass all of the bills they want to with "very steep cuts" but if they don't pass the Senate, we willl not have a law and the government will shut down.

Sarah Palin has no political future. She gave that up when she quit the governership in Alaska. The only thing Palin is interested in is her own bank account.
BY Connie O on 03/11/2011 at 08:15
Isnt it funny that the GOP is now braying about cutting spending when the last 3 GOP presidents who signed TWENTY deficit riddled budgets in the last 30 years?? What is more insidious is that this was done intentionally to privatize ALL the entitlements under a plan called "starve the beast". Google it!BY TominMA on 03/11/2011 at 08:25
Palin is right. Minimum $200 billion in cuts. The Republicans need to get some spines here and get the cuts done hard and fast. $60 billion is a good start but not near enough and time is running out. And forget the Democrats entirely who seem to have lost their collective minds. BY Black Sabbath on 03/11/2011 at 08:55
She is, of course, factually correct - the math is not that difficult. What we need is for the voters to put a super-majority of Pubbies in Congress along with a Pubbie POTUS.BY NothingLeftForMe on 03/11/2011 at 09:01
How about cutting the federal funds that go to alaska resulting in every resident of their state getting money from the fed gov. Even if they don't live there.BY b on 03/11/2011 at 09:10
Save 500 billion immediately. Cut the subsidies to the record profit oil companies and bring our troops home.BY Connie O on 03/11/2011 at 09:14
The biggest Clown out of the bunch Sara Palin.

How about give back those Tax Cuts for the rich.
BY Sara Palin the clown on 03/11/2011 at 09:18
She is s big clown that thinks she have a political future. NOT!BY sara palin the clown on 03/11/2011 at 09:20
Asked to rate the performance of Republicans in Congress on cutting spending, the potential presidential candidate said the party must push for "much greater cuts," mentioning Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) proposal to cut $500 billion in one year, to significantly pare down the nation's projected $1.6 trillion budget deficit.
This is nuts and every American and ecnomist knows it. You can not take a ax and just go on cut spending spring without hurting more people when the encomy is still trying to recover.
BY Sara the big clown on 03/11/2011 at 09:23
Palin is right… again.BY reason on 03/11/2011 at 09:30

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Blog Briefing Room Twitter - Click to follow
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gateway Pundit
Glenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Lucianne
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries » Day's End Round-Up »
 Energy & Environment » Midday Blog Roundup »
 Morning Read » News »
  Campaigns »   Administration »
   Civil Rights »   Congressional Campaigns »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Law and Courts »   Lobbyists »
   Presidential Campaigns »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Energy & Environment »  Lawmaker News »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Legislation »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Energy & Environment »
   Foreign Policy »   Healthcare »
   Homeland Security »   Immigration »
   Labor »   Lobbyists »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Lobbying »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Other »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Oversight »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.