CONNECT    

Harry Shearer

Harry Shearer

GET UPDATES FROM Harry Shearer

A Letter From New Orleans: Year 6 of a 5-Year Lifespan

Posted: 06/ 2/11 02:34 PM ET

NEW ORLEANS -- It's righteously hot at the beginning of June, a time for this area to take an involuntary intake of breath, if not a full-on gasp, before getting on with finding some shade. June 1 is the official start of the hurricane season. No whistles blow, no bands play, but the news media are full of stories about the onset of "that time of year." I've just finished taking a ride on a stretch of road that brings back memories of a previous hurricane season: the so-called "twin spans" of I-10 across Lake Pontchartrain, which were shattered and scattered like the toys of an angry child during the storm surge of Hurricane Katrina, are still, just now, undergoing the finishing touches of rebuilding.

This is a notable start of hurricane season for another reason. June 1 was the Corps of Engineers' self-imposed deadline for the completion, in name if not in fact, of their renamed Hurricane Risk Reduction System (the previous name, the Hurricane Protection System, was too ironic for the Corps, given the ghastly failures of that system during Katrina). Parts of the system are yet to be completed, or started, but the Corps is proud to say, in press release and soundbite alike, that "New Orleans has never been safer." Coming from an agency which, according to two independent forensic investigative reports (ILIT from UC Berkeley and Team Louisiana from LSU), bore primary responsibility for the death and devastation in 2005 that nearly drowned this metropolitan area, that's mild reassurance indeed. The conclusions of those two reports share an interesting distinction: both were never publicly rebutted in detail and both were widely ignored by the national news media.

So, how safe is New Orleans? John Barry, author of Rising Tide and a member of the East Bank Levee Authority (there's one for each side of the Mississippi River), zeroes in on the central fact of the "100-year protection" project for which the Congress has given the Corps somewhere in the neighborhood of $8 billion so far, with more to come:

But 100-year protection for a major city is the lowest standard of protection in the developed world. The Dutch and Japanese protect urban areas against a so-called 10,000-year flood. So our 100-year protection is not exactly something to brag about.

One other fact as we crank up the air conditioning and celebrate the achievements of an agency whose previous failure here was not followed by a single instance of punishment, sanction, or disincentive for future failure. Take the Corps at its word, for a moment, if you dare. The hydraulic pumps installed at the three places where canals empty into Lake Ponch are temporary, says the Corps, with about a five-year lifespan. (This conflicts with documentation we've found and displayed in my film about the subject, in which the Corps originally projected a 50-year lifespan for the pumps, before a Corps engineer reported that the devices in question repeatedly failed their testing, after which they were installed anyway. But we're taking the Corps at their word, remember.) Those temporary pumps have now been in place since June 1, 2006. That means, as of now, protective structures with a five-year life span are in year six.

If, like the Corps, you thought your pumps were temporary and life-limited, you'd want to be letting the contract for the replacement, permanent, this-time-we-really-mean-50-year-lifespan pumps before, say, now. But that's why you're not the Corps. The agency just announced the awarding of that contract in April, and it estimates the project will be completed in three years.

Of course, if the Corps' estimates of project completion were always correct, the Hurricane Protection System that failed in 2005, and had not yet been completed even then, would have been up and running by the mid-1970s.

But again, let's take them at their word. By the Corps' own estimate, pumps with a five-year lifespan will have been a crucial part of what keeps New Orleans from flooding again for nine years.

Just keep repeating: Never. Been. Safer.

 

Follow Harry Shearer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/theharryshearer

NEW ORLEANS -- It's righteously hot at the beginning of June, a time for this area to take an involuntary intake of breath, if not a full-on gasp, before getting on with finding some shade. June 1 i...
NEW ORLEANS -- It's righteously hot at the beginning of June, a time for this area to take an involuntary intake of breath, if not a full-on gasp, before getting on with finding some shade. June 1 i...
 
Listen to local New Orleans bands or upload your own music at
RT : (Who Dat Dish) New Orleans Saints: Three Away Games That Could Be Problematic
21 hours ago from web
Rise And New Orleans Saints: News, Videos And More
Get New Orleans neighborhood info at
(Who Dat Dish) New Orleans Saints: Three Away Games That Could Be Problematic
Had a good time in New Orleans headed back to the MIA
My New Orleans story came out in the Sunday Times today:
24 hours ago from web
Saints News: The story of the New Orleans Saints' first player, Paige Cothren -
Hindrances to New Orleans streetscape projects are being addressed
New Orleans Hornets: Dallas Mavericks, Miami Heat look to gain control of NBA Finals: Mavs have momentum heading...
Affordable apartment complexes, tailored for artists, are blossoming in New Orleans
New Orleans Hey Guys and Gals
Find the best new Restaurants in New Orleans at
St. Bernard Project celebrates 5th anniversary by helping New Orleans woman come home
I'm now leaving your New Orleans! Limo driver asked about ya said he hasn't seen u enough on ! I said, she's on there! LOL
More than 30 record highs were broken on 6/4/11. New Orleans 100 | Tuscaloosa 98 | Jackson, MS 100 | Pensacola, FL 102 | Jonesboro, AR 100
Saints News: The story of the New Orleans Saints' first player, Paige Cothren -
I stayed in a New Orleans hotel that, it turned out, was closing the next day. Service was not good. Nothing was
Saints News: New Orleans Offense -
 
  • Comments
  • 209
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »   (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcwtts1
Elections have consequences
12 hours ago (10:08 PM)
So Harry, what are Gov Jindal, David Vitter, and the rest of the GOP dominated congressio­nal delegation doing about it? I'll say this to you, if you didn't get Vitter to do anything last cycle when he was running I am not sure how you can move him now. Landrieu is up right? But will she be able to bring home the bacon in an austerity mad congress? Not sure you can expect the President to move red state legislatio­n when he's running again and there is zero chance of winning LA. So, practicall­y speaking.. how do you get what you want? And what exactly do you want from the Corp? Which pumps should you use, what should be done to the system, is there an alternativ­e plan with a cost break down? I mean there are people who want to help and want to argue your position. Help us out. According to the GOP there is no money left for anything but deficit and debt reduction. No schools, no meds, no anything but debt. I disagree with them. Making the levees safe seems like a solid expenditur­e to me. So how much money do we need and what plan should we use?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Harry Shearer
11 hours ago (11:21 PM)
Here's the problem: the cake is already baked. The next flood will have this President'­s name on it. He was warned in 2009 of the defects in the present system. The Corps has ordered replacemen­t pumps, which won't be installed for (at least) another three years. What can you do? It doesn't cost any federal money: ask the Congress (as in your Congresspe­rson) to repeal the blanket immunity the Corps has enjoyed for flood-cont­rol projects. That's what makes them failure-pr­one, the fact that they face no negative consequenc­es for failure.
BTW, see David Vitters cross-exam of the Corps' Gen. Walsh in my film "The Big Uneasy". This is not a partisan issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcwtts1
Elections have consequences
10 hours ago (12:41 AM)
I wish you were right about this not being a partisan issue. I mean, I get why you think the next flood will be pinned on O, but that is going to be a difficult sell nationally­. Oh, people in LA and NOLA and across the Gulf may pin it on him but will you be able to pin it on him in NY, in PA, in OH? I don't think so. I mean you can't even get pols and people to admit that the flooding after Katrina wasn't a natural disaster but a systemic failure of epic proportion­s. The ACE has blanket immunity the way the military does, the way the federal government does, the way the congress does. That isn't going anywhere. Three years seems ludicrous in the process of replace substandar­d pumps. We should be able to get that done in months not years. In weeks, not months.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SickHippie
No, YOUR micro-bio is empty.
13 hours ago (9:58 PM)
Frustratin­g, since there was a time when the Army Corp of Engineers was the best of the best. Of course, there was a time when the government built their own projects too.

So it goes.
13 hours ago (9:14 PM)
Do everything half way on the cheap. That's the way to show we're number one--numbe­r one chumps.
23 hours ago (12:02 PM)
Does the army core of engineers go out of their way to hire the laziest,mo­st inept people in the world? Are they actually in the army?Who are they?
Why isn't a real engineerin­g company building the levies in New Orleans?
22 hours ago (12:46 PM)
Amazing the informatio­n you can find on the Internet.
http://www­.usace.arm­y.mil/abou­t/Pages/Ho­me.aspx

I doubt they are the laziest, most inept people in the entire world. Finding those people would require too much effort. So, I'm sure there are many lazier, more inept people who are not employed by the Corps.

As for the levees in New Orleans, they are designed by "contracto­rs." That is the term the Federal aquisition process uses for what other people call consultant­s. They are profession­al engineerin­g companies who are selected based on their "qualifica­tions," which usually means they have a "relations­hip" with the Corps. Attach your own interpreta­tion to that term.

The levees are built by contractor­s of the sort you see building highways and other public works. They are generally selected according to the lowest bid process familiar to most people.

They are all immune to the sort of liability that attaches to most other engineerin­g works in the country.
23 hours ago (11:52 AM)
Harry, if you expect government to competentl­y fix a problem, your trust is sadly misplaced.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Harry Shearer
18 hours ago (4:36 PM)
Here is the problem with that simplistic formulatio­n: "governmen­t" in this case is just a project manager for work, constructi­on and design, done by private contractor­s.
23 hours ago (11:07 AM)
Harry - Great reporting on NOLA and the Corps. You are doing heroic work by pointing out the gaps in the Corps' work. Unfortunat­ely the evidence (Katrina, Financial oversight, I-35W bridge) shows we can never really rely on US govt agencies to their jobs and provide the protection needed. Do you see steps ongoing by private agencies, individual­s, companies to step in and provide people with some protection improvemen­ts? Are there other steps, people can take on their own to provide protection or is moving above sea level the only option available to them?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Harry Shearer
23 hours ago (11:46 AM)
Unfortunat­ely, analyzing the Corps situation doesn't lend itself to neat public/pri­vate dichotomie­s. The present-da­y Corps, hollowed out in the 1980s, contracts out most of its design and constructi­on work to private contractor­s. People can take steps on their own in areas where they have the legal latitutde: check out the story of the Mayor of Napa refusing the Corps' offer to "manage" the river through town, opting instead for a quasi-Dutc­h approach to keeping the river natural and providing natural ways of storage and drainage in flood times. But in 1965 when Congress authorized a program to protect New Orleans against the "maximum probable hurricane"­, it gave exclusive jurisdicti­on over that job to the Corps, so the only role for locals is to pony up the dollars they're required to send in as part of a "cost-shar­ing" obligation­.
22 hours ago (12:34 PM)
OK thanks I'll check out Napa. Seems like there should be someone in the Army command that is accountabl­e for the New Orleans levies. Inadequate pumps are inviting another disaster.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Altario
Among nerds, I'm cool.
07:44 AM on 6/05/2011
Live in an earthquake zone, don't be surprisaed when the earth moves. Live in tornado alley, don't be surprised when the wind picks up. Live below sea level, don't be surprised when the water rises. But, hey, we're smarter/be­tter/stron­ger than Mother Nature. We'll show her who's boss.
07:56 AM on 6/05/2011
And if we don't, we can always blame someone else for our misfortune­!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Harry Shearer
09:22 AM on 6/05/2011
New Orleans has been around longer than the USA. Until the Corps of Engineers stepped in to protect it, the worst hurricane effect on the city was flooding in 20% of the area. The Corps failure resulted in the flooding of 80%. Is that Nature's fault?
23 hours ago (11:53 AM)
Just another reason to keep govt small and tightly constraine­d.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Altario
Among nerds, I'm cool.
20 hours ago (2:05 PM)
Not at all. It is the hubris of man that is at fault. We somehow think that we have the knowledge or power to stop the forces of nature, when in reality, we are miniscule in comparison­. Then, when things inevitably go wrong, we look around for someone to blame, and for someone else to pay for us to rebuild in the same spot. I'm not against people living wherever they wish, but know the risks. If you accept them, then the onus to rebuild and stay is upon you alone.
09:54 AM on 6/05/2011
so you are saying we should not live anywhere, because there is not a place in the US that is safe from natural disasters? Crazy, much?
06:42 AM on 6/05/2011
The insanity you describe, Mr. Shearer, is a direct result of Republican policies and governing philosophy­. I've heard Lawrence O'Donnell describe it as "starve the beast", where the government agencies responsibl­e are underfunde­d to the point where they are unable, even if willing, to do their jobs.
It's all part and parcel of the anti-gover­nment regulation­, anti-gover­nment oversight,
government­-is-the-pr­oblem approach. This view is held by some despite all evidence that such an approach leads to such disasters as you describe. And speaking of disasters, BP's disastrous oil spill
in the Gulf of Mexico last year was undoubtabl­y largely due to lax government oversight and regulation
of the oil companies. You've written in these pages about that as well. I responded to your article at the time. I mentioned that I had written a song about it called Special Place.
Here's the link: http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=FMvPDK8oJ­Bk
My YouTube channel is maesthetic­ian. My website for donations is www.maesth­etician.co­m.
I say reelect President Obama, give him bulletproo­f, filibuster­-proof Democratic majorities
in both houses of Congress, then hold their feet to the fire like nobody's business.
Let's restore (or begin) a higher level of competence to government­.
May New Orleans be successful­ly restored.
Please forgive the shameless plugs.
06:48 AM on 6/05/2011
Also forgive my spelling. "undoubtab­l­y" should have been "undoubted­ly".
24 hours ago (10:57 AM)
Undoubtabl­y is an earlier form of the word. It is perfectly acceptable­.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Harry Shearer
09:21 AM on 6/05/2011
I wish the situation were as clear, and as partisan, as you suggest. The Corps made its egregious errors in judgment on the previous "protectio­n system" for New Orleans over 4-plus decades under administra­tions of both parties. Additional­ly, a report from a whistleblo­wer inside the Corps (validated by the DOJ's Office of Special Counsel) states that the hydraulic pumps at the heart of the "new, improved" system failed their testing repeatedly and have such serious design defects that they will not perform in a storm surge event. That report went to President Obama's desk in June of 2009. Despite having majorities in both houses of Congress, the President took no action.
09:50 AM on 6/05/2011
Harry, I seldom see you write about the funding issues of SELA 1995- the ACOE project put in place in 1995, to inspect and repair the entire levee system. The cold hard and terrible fact is this: The project was rolling along just fine until Bush took office. Here's February 2002, budget:
Bush provided just $5 million for maintainin­g and upgrading critical hurricane protection levees in New Orleans— a mere sliver of what government experts and Republican elected officials in Louisiana told the administra­tion was needed. Bush knew SELA needed $80 million to keep working, he knew how critical the project was and how disastrous it would be if the levees failed, but the he cut it anyway. The levee failed, because that section went uninspecte­d and unrepaired­.
24 hours ago (10:50 AM)
Thank you for responding­, Mr. Shearer. Between the two major political parties, I'm sure there's enough blame to go around. President Obama doesn't come out of this smelling like a rose, either. I do take issue with the word "partisan" in describing my analysis. I'm not trying to be partisan. I'm trying to accurately describe a mindset that has led to mismanagem­ent of the levee system and the hydraulic pumps which you describe.
It's not partisan to observe that the mindset that is opposed to government regulation
in general is more closely identified with the Republican­s, don't you think?
photo
The Smartest Monkees
Planet of the Apes? We're on it, baby!
08:06 AM on 6/04/2011
Just testing to see if there is a glitch on this blog, as my post, which has nothing offensive in it, will not materializ­e. Here goes....cl­ick....
06:39 AM on 6/04/2011
What makes such organizati­ons so inept? I have to imagine they have some intelligen­t people working there... maybe? Is it politics alone or is it a misalignme­nt of incentives (just what does motivate the Corp anyway - funding?).
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Harry Shearer
11:12 AM on 6/04/2011
Here's a clue: in 1927, Congress gave the Corps blanket immunity from liability on its flood-cont­rol projects. Whatever kind of institutio­n you have, private or public, if there are no disincenti­ves for failure, you're going to get more...fai­lure. Nobody from the Corps experience­d any negative consequenc­es--not loss of a month's pay, not even the loss of a parking space--for almost destroying a major American city. In fact, the Corps got a big new bundle of money to do the job again.
08:13 PM on 6/04/2011
Harry, thanks for taking the time to respond to me (I did not expect that).

That's more than a clue and explains quite a bit. No, I have not seen your movie yet. I will I will.

Next question - is there any hope in instilling some system with accountabi­lity and incentives that match the goals of the people being served by the corps? For example, a new incentive might be something like... hmmm, how about this - don't destroy our homes.
photo
The Smartest Monkees
Planet of the Apes? We're on it, baby!
05:49 AM on 6/05/2011
Very well said, Harry, and makes the situation very easy to understand­.

Speaking of failures and their consequenc­es, how do things stand in the area concerning the BP oil spill? We in the rest of the country, keep seeing the commercial­s BP puts out talking about how responsibl­e they've been and how "back to normal" things are getting there.
While I certainly hope that has been and is the case, what is your assessment­? New Orleans issues have a habit, as you well know, of being ignored by the national media after times of crisis.
24 hours ago (10:41 AM)
Blanket immunity is an excellent formula for explaining 2005's failures, which resulted from the 1965 Act.

The 1927 Act delivered the blanket immunity in the first place. It also delivered the Mississipp­i River system which did not fail in this year's trial.

The difference in engineerin­g challenges is significan­t, but not nearly so significan­t as the difference in results. As you observe elsewhere: before the Corps, the worst flooding was 20%; after the Corps, the worst flooding was 80%.
20 hours ago (2:33 PM)
Knowing NOLA after living there 10 years I cannot wrap my head around the fact that the Corp got blanket immunity. Does that cover all the private contractor­s that the Corp hired to do their work?It appears that BP too got immunity for the Deep Horizon explosion from what I have read…..sor­ry off topic. But it is only another devastatio­n on top of Katrina and NOLA's levys.
If this devastatio­n happened in LA or NYC/NE area it would have been cleaned up and brought to standards without a blink of the eye.
Thank you, Harry, for all that you have done to keep us informed on your beautiful city. I have enjoyed following you and will continue. You are a good man.cbb
09:52 AM on 6/05/2011
in the case of the Katrina levee failure- yes, lack of funding.
12:53 AM on 6/04/2011
If NO is correctly protected, and low and middle class housing in the city given a boost, less Louisiana teabaggers will get elected because NO is where the Democrats live, and many will return given just a couple minimal condition improvemen­ts.
12:47 AM on 6/04/2011
People act like it would have been so harrrrd to prevent NO flooding.

1. Correctly built floodwalls­.

2. MR GO filled in--or preferably­, following the advice of experts, never built.

That's it. Even one of them would have cut the damage in half. Both and no flood. Period. Voila.
24 hours ago (10:43 AM)
Restoring wetlands is the longterm answer.
18 hours ago (4:45 PM)
Correct. I'm just talking about the short-term contingenc­ies.
12:02 AM on 6/04/2011
New Orleans is sinking. That's what happens when you pump all the oil, gas and water out of the ground. Who cares if you are too poor to move away?
24 hours ago (10:49 AM)
New Orleans is sank because the street drainage system lowered the water table and exposed the organic matter in the soil to air. It rotted and lost volume. The overlying strata lost elevation and lowered the affected parts of the City. This did not affect all parts of the City because about half is built on soil with little organic matter. Most profession­als do not believe the oil and gas extration is a significan­t contributo­r.
15 hours ago (7:40 PM)
"
Surface and subsurface data strongly indicate that the rapid subsidence and associated wetland
loss were largely induced by extraction of hydrocarbo­ns and associated formation water"
http://www­.bergan.co­m/Download­s/MortEtal­.pdf
http://www­.aegweb.or­g/i4a/page­s/index.cf­m?pageid=4­076 Extraction is generally recognized as causing subsidence­.
06:53 PM on 6/03/2011
Ties in nicely with the article on deteriorat­ing infrastruc­ture.
06:39 PM on 6/03/2011
Most people couldn't care less.
photo
The Smartest Monkees
Planet of the Apes? We're on it, baby!
03:41 AM on 6/04/2011
About you, LC? I'm sure that's true.