CONNECT    

Shaun Donovan

Shaun Donovan

GET UPDATES FROM Shaun Donovan

Greener Homes Means a Stronger Economy

Posted: 06/ 3/11 04:27 PM ET

With gas prices topping $4 a gallon families and businesses are facing a real burden. But we can take action to ensure the American people don't fall victim to volatile energy costs over the long term.

And with 40 percent of America's carbon emissions coming from our buildings, one of the most important steps is building and retrofitting homes to cost less to power, heat and cool.
That's why nearly a third of HUD's Recovery Act funds can be used for "greening" America's affordable housing stock.

With these funds, we are on track to provide 245,000 affordable homes with a range of energy improvements, while another 55,000 receive green retrofits that will save up to 40 percent in energy costs.

Dozens of those homes can be found in the San Francisco Bay Area at Eden Issei Terrace, a 100‐apartment residence for low‐income seniors in Hayward, California. Using $750,000 in Recovery Act funds, Eden made energy upgrades that are already cutting utility costs by a third. Just as important, this investment has created good-paying jobs that can't be outsourced.

Properties like these have proven that investments in green housing pay for themselves.
Our challenge now is to catalyze that change on a transformational scale - driven by the massive private investment we need to win the future.

That's why I went to Eden Issei Tuesday to launch Green Refinance Plus - a new Obama Administration initiative that builds on Recovery Act investments to unlock the private capital we need to retrofit thousands of affordable homes.

A joint effort between the Federal Housing Administration and Fannie Mae, Green Refinance Plus will help owners of older affordable multifamily properties be among the first to go green while refinancing their mortgages at today's historically low interest rates.

While FHA provides additional insurance coverage, Fannie Mae will provide loan underwriting that will generate additional loan proceeds to make green improvements.

A typical development will be able to access a loan that is 5 percent larger. For a $5 million loan, that means an additional $250,000 will be available to support green systems and appliances -- saving owners and renters money, while reducing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.

Green Refinance Plus provides real bang for the buck -- and another jolt to our economy, which has already added 2.1 million private sector jobs over 14 consecutive months.

Over the next four years, the green building industry will support nearly 8 million jobs and generate more than a half trillion dollars in economic activity.

Together, these efforts reflect a fundamental belief of President Obama's: That when we invest in clean energy, we invest in a new generation of professionals, ready to build, install, repair and maintain clean energy technologies.

That greening our homes is one of the keys to the 21st century economy -- and to out-innovating our competitors.

And that real change requires leadership, solutions and capital from the private sector.
Driving that change is what Green Refinance Plus is about -- and why I was proud to unveil it this week.

 

Follow Shaun Donovan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@HUDnews

 
  • Comments
  • 153
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »   (4 total)
11:10 AM on 6/06/2011
We have means now for clean renewable energy AND organic food production within the same system ...
10:51 PM on 6/05/2011
spec homes are made to sell and make money with a buyer in mind....th­e buyer has to have an appraisal that is high enough to borrow money. green doesnt normally fit into that equation. custom homes, some folks care, but in spec homes unless there is a change in tax deductions or some other way to encourage builders to build green, it isnt going to happen any time soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Southern Rational
10:30 PM on 6/05/2011
There is a hidden problem with the financing. Landlords are not in business to lose money. If they renovate 100 apartments for $250k, they need to recoup the principal plus interest through increased rents.

The tenants, or landlord depending on how the units are metered, might save money on energy and lose it in additional principal and interest.

It makes far more sense to show average homeowners how they can lower their heating/co­oling bills by about 30% for less than $100 by simply cutting architectu­ral sheathing-­-the styrofoam stuff they put on the outside of buildings before the siding is installed-­-to fit all their windows.

The sheathing goes up at night when it is either hot or colder than they like and during the day on windows which get full sun in the summer (or don't in the winter.) It can also go up in all windows during the day if no one is home. Making sure all windows can be open in good weather also helps.

Planting deciduous trees which shade the South and West facing walls and windows of the house also greatly improves savings. An attic blanket. energy star appliances­, hot-water-­on-demand systems, CFL lightbulbs and a Florida heat pump (deep thermal) complete the array.

We have seven years experience­. Energy costs for a total electric house our size, age and constructi­on average $400-$600 per month. Our bills are $100-$200. And our trees are just beautiful!
photo
Alwayspissedoffatsomeone
Fighting for Common Sense
10:10 PM on 6/05/2011
More prisons means a stronger economy. More arrests of illegal immigrants means a stronger economy. Increased gun sales mean a stronger economy. More oil exploratio­n and drilling means a stronger economy. And so on and so on ...
10:29 PM on 6/05/2011
Yes, more Bankster gambling on Swaps means a stronger economy, more wars mean a stronger economy, more drug arrest mean a stronger economy. The love of money is indeed the root of all evil. Faved, already fanned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Howell
James Madison...a pretty bright fellow.
09:44 PM on 6/05/2011
A lot of people are long since past the point of reacting negatively to anything that claims the label "green." For my part, I will not buy any product that makes such a claim. It's my own way of rejecting the monstrous hoax that is human-caus­ed climate change.
09:02 PM on 6/05/2011
Recovery Act dollars? What a waste. No Jobs. No Growth. Forced ideology based on the hoax of Global Warming. Forced. Democrats love to FORCE their views onAmerican­. Affordable Social Housing (the root cause of the recession) where Democrats threatened our banks with cease and disist orders to FORCE our banks to open up Billions of dollars a year in new credit to people who previously DID NOT QUALIFY from 1995 until 2007 when this really BAD IDEA collapsed our banks and Wall Street. Next comes Affordable Social Health Care where Democrats FORCED our insurance companie to insure MILLION of pre existing condition people resulting in people $25 co pays from last year morphing into $3,000 deductible­s that reset every Jan 1. Now it`s like not even having insurance any more. Democrats RUIN everything­...
09:44 PM on 6/05/2011
Uh....if it makes you feel good, enjoy. tooth fairy stuff n
But kind of fun.
Gasparilla
my father was a gambling man down in New Orleans
08:07 PM on 6/05/2011
It's a matter of thinking long term. When my shingle roof got torn up by hurricanes­, I took the check and added more of my own money and got a metal roof. It reflects heat and my house is at least eight degrees cooler during the day. It will also last decades more than other roofs. I bought a Ford Fusion hybrid last december. Cost me probably five thousand extra, but I get almost 42 mpg. Those things will pay me back.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
23 hours ago (9:24 PM)
Until your Hybrid needs to be repaired. The only place you can get it fixed would be a dealership and they are generally 30% higher than your local repairman.
Gasparilla
my father was a gambling man down in New Orleans
13 hours ago (7:39 AM)
Eight years or 100,000 miles on every hybrid component. Sounds good to me.
06:37 PM on 6/05/2011
Perhaps the U.S. should be investing in green boarding houses, as the workers are kept out of the housing market by large down payments and stagnating wages...

http://www­.brynmawr.­edu/cities­/archx/05-­600/proj/p­2/aca/what­_is_a_boar­ding_house­.htm
What is a Boarding House?
06:34 PM on 6/05/2011
It's OK everyone. HUD, the FHA, and Fannie Mae will fix everything­.

Go back to bed America your government is in control.
09:05 PM on 6/05/2011
Barney Frank is on the Job! We are screwed!
06:26 PM on 6/05/2011
Its admirable that HUD supports 'green' building. But one must be careful about corporate promotion of their LEED certified products. Consider Koch Industries and LEED. K.I. through Georgia Pacific and Stainmaste­r Carpets (to mention just two divisions) sells numerous "LEED certified" products. In fact its hard to set foot in a constructi­on site without tripping over a GP product. Of course the profits from these "green product" sales can go to finance anti-envir­onmental political groups and legislatio­n. Koch Industries was one of the largest donors to the campaign for California Prop 23, designed to gut the state's clean air controls and establish a precedent for a national clean air rollback and emasculati­on of the EPA. Koch Industries has funded climate change sceptics to a great extent. So beware their claims to support carbon emissions reduction through LEED.
photo
nirek
Progressive and proud American Vietnam Veteran aga
05:22 PM on 6/05/2011
It takes effort on the part of every one of us to green up our homes and cars.
I traded my F150, after closing my farm down, for a Honda Insight ! 15 to 43 mpg.
I put my solar array in three years ago and it makes 120% of my power.
Here in Vermont they passed a new law that goes in effect 1-1-2012 and says the power companies will have to buy my extra power at 6 cents per KWH..

If I can do these things , then you can do something to help, too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
22 hours ago (9:42 PM)
If these solar panels are so great, why doesn't the government pay to have every house given solar panels enough to provide 100% of a home's energy needs and take a monthly average of a home's energy coast and take that as a monthly payment till the loan is paid off with something like 3% interest? My guess is that would be a losing propositio­n for the government so they won't do it.
photo
nirek
Progressive and proud American Vietnam Veteran aga
13 hours ago (7:07 AM)
It would be great if the government did that, but there are too many deniers out there and too many folks who do not want the government to intrude.

What bothers me is that the government subsidizes oil, nuclear, and coal heavily!
12:13 PM on 6/05/2011
I think people would be happy to get a home lone at all.The most expensive remodel I've heard of in the Bay Area
was converting a regular house into a green one.They didn't even add any square footage.
photo
Alwayspissedoffatsomeone
Fighting for Common Sense
12:03 PM on 6/05/2011
Oh stop. Just what this country needs is to throw more money away on things that have absolutely NO EFFECT on the world, climate, atmosphere or the planet's ability to conduct business as usual. Just stop it already. Enough of this perpetual nonsense.
02:39 PM on 6/05/2011
RIGHT and RIGHT !!!!!!!!!
photo
Dredd
Our government is a wartocracy.
05:03 PM on 6/05/2011
Yep, far, far right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
11:57 AM on 6/05/2011
Let's do the math here. 750,000/10­0 = $7500 an apartment. I own a home and my energy costs are about 170.00 a month. That is for a full home. Let's figure an apartment cost 140.00 which would be high. Take 140 * 1/3 = 47.00 a month savings. Need I say more. I know it will take more than 12 years to recover the costs. Not a good investment­.
12:33 PM on 6/05/2011
12 years sounds good, considerin­g that after that your electricit­y is FREE. How long are you going to live compared to 12 years? Are you in your 80's or something?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
03:07 PM on 6/05/2011
The electricit­y is not free. As the article says it reduces the cost by up to 1/3. It probably doesn't even reach a 1/3 savings. That may be optimistic­. I am not against green improvemen­ts especially in new constructi­on. Obviously, when something new is being built the cost will be much less because you are not replacing something that is already there so the increase will be minimal. By the way, in an apartment the payback may be much longer since 170.00 is how much it cost for gas and electric in my 4 bedroom, 1/2 bath ranch home. The cost will probably be close to 100.00 a month in an average size apartment. Do that math. These kind of improvemen­ts work best in new constructi­on.
07:50 PM on 6/05/2011
You forget that most of this eqipment has an unknown life span, and solar panels for example, break down quickly. Pumps wear out, seals need to be replaced.

You've created a new industry to service this stuff, but saving money? not much. I bought heat pumps before most people had ever heard of them. I've been thru solar panels.

Believe me, they have limited life spans
01:37 PM on 6/05/2011
You're right. A 12 year payback does not compete with many other "investmen­t instrument­s" but that shouldn't undermine the value of energy upgrading.
1.) The durable improvemen­ts (windows, doors, insulation­) will be in place long after they're paid off.
2.) Investment risk. First question, do the improvemen­ts deliver? They do. Second question. Is cost of energy production more likely to go up or down? Up, the debate is how much and how fast.
3.) Durability and lifespan. I'm a contractor­. I'm the guy who skins you for big bucks (I wish!) when water condensati­on from the lousy window damages the wall framing over time, the black mold from poor ventilatio­n made you sick or the sub floor in front of the door is damaged because the door leaked. My point - Energy efficient houses tend to be "healthier­". Fewer problems, repairs and in the case of mold, less stigma at time of sale due to required disclosure­.
Green building lacks glamour. Green technology is largely based on a sensible, sometimes pedantic view that focuses on the long term. But then, there's a Lotta burnin' love in those repackaged derivative­s!
You're still right. 12 year payback is long even if the home is destined to exist for decades (barring physical or natural disaster). BTW I'm not a "tree hugger"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
03:10 PM on 6/05/2011
Just to let you know. I am not against these kind of improvemen­ts in new constructi­on. Obviously in new constructi­on the cost will be much lower maybe only pennies on the dollar as you would save. As far as glamour goes, I would live in a large block house if the place was roomy and had many rooms and cost me very little to heat and air condition.
photo
nirek
Progressive and proud American Vietnam Veteran aga
05:26 PM on 6/05/2011
My array will return my money in 7-8 years, that means 4-5 more years and My power is free..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
11:10 PM on 6/05/2011
I don't know what kind of array you have but from I understand solar panels cut the cost of power by about 30%. Next, what they are talking about here is nothing more than insulation­, better windows, etc. That outlay has nothing to do with power generation from the complex.
10:55 PM on 6/05/2011
i agree...12 year payout is a long payout....­.7500 x 2 15k cost of money at a minimum...­.the only way to green is for the govt to give away interest free money for the purpose.
photo
nirek
Progressive and proud American Vietnam Veteran aga
13 hours ago (7:15 AM)
Lets look at your car with the value dropping a couple thou the moment you drive off the lot. Now there is a great investment­! Gas, oil, batteries, filters , and license plates, inspection­s,taxes on the vehicle , oil changes, and a bunch of other costs to run the thing.
Wow I like my hybrid and my solar array. For me it was a good investment­.

To each his own.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa104inf
1 hour ago (7:03 PM)
Again, these people are not getting a solar array. For the 7500.00 they are getting new windows, insulation­, etc. My guess is the work can only be done by union employees making 100.00 an hour and components can only be bought from certain vendors.
11:54 AM on 6/05/2011
Wow, the Green movement really worked well for Spain didn't it. They are even more broke than us!

For every green job created, they lost 2 more. Their economy is even more troubling than ours and progressiv­es want to move to a green economy which MUST be subsidized by GOVERNMENT­.

Go to europe, take your train and get it out of your system, they don't pay for themselves­.
12:35 PM on 6/05/2011
The economy was not crashed by the green jobs, it was crashed by the wealthy gambling, and not paying their fair share of taxes. Why would you expect green jobs to completley offset the immense wealth and actions of those wealthy gamblers?
01:56 PM on 6/05/2011
Please develop further. Are you saying that the wealthy crooks in Spain destroyed their economy by not paying enough in taxes? Do you know what there tax rates are?

I must have been Bush's fault!
09:12 PM on 6/05/2011
The top 1% of income earners already pay 40% of ALL income taxes collected. 51% of US households currently pay ZERO in income taxes after they qualify for tax credits. Stop lieing. The economy crashed because Clinton threatened our banks with cease and disist orders if they didn`t open up Billions of dollars a year in new credit to people who previously DID NOT QUALIFY from 1995 until 2007/08 when this really bad idea bankrupted our banks and Wall Street. Bush started sounding the warning of Affordable Social Housing as far back as 2001 and even upgraded his warning to a systemic economic collapse in 2003 all the while being screamed at and blocked by Democrats like Barney Frank and Maxine Waters. Go read stuff!
02:11 PM on 6/05/2011
Spain wasn't scoring bulls eyes before the whole PV deal went down, frankly. What happened? The government offered a FIT based on .56/Kwhr (currency adjusted) which was what Germany bases their FIT on. They then increased the system size limit from 10Kw to 10Mw. Way too generous. Spain has much more sun, so much that systems could be profitable down at .32 not the .56 "free for all" rate. And then investors, seeing the economy of scale started building huge systems that generated FIT at .56. Oh dear! AND.. the euro market rate at the time was about .40 so they were gonna lose no matter what. All this happened in 2007-09 which put the final coffin nails in
03:01 PM on 6/05/2011
Thank you.