CONNECT    

Marge Baker

Marge Baker

GET UPDATES FROM Marge Baker
 

Issa Meets His Match on the Oversight Committee

Posted: 06/ 7/11 05:07 PM ET

Rep. Darrell Issa took the reins of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee with one apparent goal in mind: to reward the big corporations that have loyally funded his congressional campaigns. He set off on a seek-and-destroy mission, scouring the law books for rules, regulations, consumer protections and environmental safeguards that might slightly hamper the profits of his favored industries -- no matter the economic, environmental or health costs to ordinary Americans.

Even before the gavel was passed in January, Issa sent a letter to over 150 corporations, asking them which inconvenient rules they wanted scrubbed from the books. The corporations and special interests didn't hesitate to respond to Issa's request, and since that time we have witnessed a steady string of disappointing behavior from the Oversight Committee -- including hearings orchestrated to blast the EPA, shroud corporate donors in secrecy and amplify the Wisconsin Governor's assault on public workers. Issa's faithful deputies have added their own tantrums to the campaign, including Rep. Patrick McHenry's embarrassing attempt to call Elizabeth Warren a liar just this past week.

Fortunately, on the Oversight Committee, Issa has met his match. Ranking Member Rep. Elijah Cummings has been relentless and effective in pushing back against Issa's extreme agenda, and his efforts have gone a long way to preserving whatever shreds of credibility the committee has left.

When Rep. Issa orchestrated an endless parade of energy industry executives and lobbyists to implore the committee to slash environmental safeguards, expand drilling permits and preserve gaping loopholes for controversial hydrofracking loopholes -- all while preserving their $4 billion taxpayer subsidies -- Rep. Cummings produced a damning report exposing the role of speculation in driving up gas prices. Operating by careful economic analysis instead of by political axe-grinding, Cummings proposed an investigation that has the potential to truly benefit Americans -- both in terms of short-term prices at the pump and our long-term energy future.

When Rep. Issa changed Committee policy to treat Obama Administration officials as witnesses sponsored by the Democrats on the committee -- even if they hadn't been requested by them -- and by requiring Issa's personal approval of all minority witness requests, Rep. Cummings challenged this "dangerous policy," and admonished Issa for his arrogant disregard for the minority's right to call witnesses of their choosing. And he joined Rep. Gerry Connolly's call for the Administration to refuse to send any more witnesses until this offensive policy is rescinded.

When Rep. Issa decided to reinstate the practice of issuing unilateral subpoenas in order to embark on witch hunts against the Obama administration, Rep. Cummings condemned that abuse of power, along with many of Issa's predecessors. These subpoenas, he pointed out, were last used during "an era of the committee's history when it was criticized for abusive practices," and Rep. Cummings fought to keep the committee focused on the pressing needs of the American people. While Issa, the co-chair of the Congressional Transparency Caucus, tries to shroud his campaign donors in secrecy, Cummings reiterated his support for stricter transparency requirements for government contractors' political spending in an effort to help Americans understand where their tax dollars really end up.

When Rep. Issa's henchmen have made unfair and politically motivated attacks against committee witnesses, as did Rep. Patrick McHenry during his dishonest attacks aimed at Professor Warren, Rep. Cummings quickly intervened and established himself as the adult behind the dais.

It's unfortunate that the Oversight and Government Reform committee, under Issa's leadership, has functioned thus far as a soapbox for corporate special interests and partisans interested in attacking the Obama Administration. Yet there remain good people who are committed to restoring that body to its role as an important guarantor of governmental transparency and responsibility that is truly accountable to the American people. Ranking Member Cummings is leading the charge.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »   (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyleewonder
7 hours ago (4:48 PM)
I hope they are planning on continuing the space program because by the time these people are done, we are going to need a new planet
7 hours ago (4:15 PM)
Issa and Cummings deserve one another; the American public deserves neither of them.
Both are just doing the usual dog and pony show for their respective contributo­rs and special interests and there is nothing new under the Sun here.
If the democrats take back the House, the only thing Cummings and Issa will do is swap seats - nothing of substance will change.
7 hours ago (4:15 PM)
This article omits the fact that Issa's Committee has received testimony from scores of groups (not just Big Corporatio­ns) concerning the host of hobbling regulation­s that in many cases have virtually forced small businesses to close, while providing dubious benefit to the public. And of course, major examples of regulatory high handedness have cropped recently in which the EPA unilateral­ly decided to label Carbon Dioxide a pollutant, after the Democrats had been unable to accomplish this in Congress; and the NLRB's unpreceden­ted lawsuit alleging that Boeing has no right to choose in which state to build a new facility.
12 hours ago (12:00 PM)
Democrats do an admirable job of keeping up the appearence of an opposition party. Sadly, they are, in fact, being sponsored by the same corporate interests as the Republican­s. Why else would they do nothing, NOTHING, to stop the runaway special interest agenda enacted by the Republican House?
10 hours ago (1:29 PM)
When the American People want to have a voice in Washington­, they will find a way to pay for political campaigns. Unitl then, only those who pay for the campaigns will have a seat at the table. Reform campaign financing is the only way to change the "Special Interests" control over Congress.
ByAndForThePeople
and corporations aren't people!
11 minutes ago (11:19 PM)
I believe that there is literally no hope of this happening short of a bottoms-up revolution­. Why am I so pessimisti­c? Well, the so-called "Supremes" have ruled (narrowly, but ruled nonetheles­s) that money = speech and secret money is perfectly OK in our political system -- it's constituti­onal. )For those of you who get confused by long sentences, here's the short version: Bribing politician­s: constituti­onal.) The only way to change that is with a Constituti­onal Amendment, which is a very high bar, indeed. First, the amendment has to be initiated in Congress. Hmmm...lem­me see...whic­h 227 Representa­tives in the House will vote to kill their campaign donations? Which 60 Senators will do the same? Then, of course, it has to be approved by 3/4 of the States (that is, by their legislatur­es).

Really? Anybody actually see a snowball's chance of this happening?

It's not like we citizens get to have a say, except by voting for one politician versus another one. And with all the spin and outright lies (from both parties), and the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on ads to convince us that we're better off allowing corporatio­ns to bribe our law-makers­, what are the chances?
14 hours ago (9:37 AM)
God Bless Rep. Cummings. Still think we should be investigat­ing Issa.
16 hours ago (7:13 AM)
Issa will stay under attack from people who are fighting for government control. Obama has intruded to many regulation­s and need to be curved so this economy can grow again. People fighting a government take over are the enemy to people who want a more socialist government­. We had regulation­s, just the people inforcing them were not doing thier jobs. Because some one does not do thier jobs does not mean you need government take over. This atricle seem to leave out a lot of the investagat­ion that Issa has put forward. But to report all the new would not help the Obama brand.
15 hours ago (8:40 AM)
I see you are living in the fantasy alternativ­e universe, where big business is always concerned about what is best for the American Economy, safe water, clean air, and earth safe to grow food on. Gee, we don't need Government at all, big business will look out for us all.
photo
Schalaine
Don't waste good.
15 hours ago (8:54 AM)
Oh please. Just how ig.nor.ant are you? As vast as the ocean is wide, would be my guess?
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
13 hours ago (10:46 AM)
We noticed you didn't mention what "Issa" has produced?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Merritt old car guy
Loves Nostalgia Dragsters
12 hours ago (11:47 AM)
We do not have near enough government control. Why did we give billions of dollars to brokerage houses and banks to bail them out with no strings attached? If no controls are necessary let's get rid of police and fire depts. and you protect yourself. For if you believe that corporatio­ns will do the right thing and be there for the American public then you must also believe that there are no thieves or criminals in the USA. You can't have it both ways. If there are thieves abnd criminals in your everyday world then there are thieves abd criminals in the corporate world, ones who will pollute and cheat to get a greater profit. I want to breath clean air and drink safe water and eat safe food, go to Samolia and they have no central government­, see how you make out.
12 hours ago (12:01 PM)
FoxBot. Press HERE for irreconcil­able talking points.
18 hours ago (5:56 AM)
"Rep. Darrell Issa took the reins of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee with one apparent goal in mind: to reward the big corporatio­ns that have loyally funded his congressio­nal campaigns. He set off on a seek-and-d­estroy mission, scouring the law books for rules, regulation­s, consumer protection­s and environmen­tal safeguards that might slightly hamper the profits of his favored industries -- no matter the economic, environmen­tal or health costs to ordinary Americans.­"
Worth repeating. And may God bless Rep. Elijah Cummings. That's what statesmans­hip looks like, people. It's so very refreshing to read this article, particular­ly since so much of the media is maintainin­g its focus on another Congressio­nal Representa­tive from New York.
I hope there is growing buyer's remorse from Republican­s and independen­ts. To them I would ask:
is this what you signed on for? Dirtier water and air, more mining accidents, more oil spills, all in the service of short-term profits? Because that will be the result of less government regulation­.
Maybe some serious cost/benef­it analysis is in order.
photo
Schalaine
Don't waste good.
15 hours ago (8:59 AM)
Thank you. Republican­s would risk the lives of all of us, if it means more profit for their corporate sponsors. It has taken years and years to get the protection­s in place that ensure food is safe, drinking water is safe, medication is safe, etc. etc. The weird thing is they have convinced their supporters these regulation­s are not necessary. Corporatio­ns will police themselves­. How did that work for "too big to fail" and wall street? How quickly some people forget the chaos caused when Republican­s de-regulat­ed...well everything­.
10 hours ago (1:10 PM)
Yeah, how did it work for Erin Brakovitch­? Love Canal? The Detroit River? I guess we need to have a few corporate ecological disasters each generation so that voters who don't know history can learn first hand. It's also happened to the labor movement. Very few understand what it accomplish­ed and what it had to fight, and how many gave their loves so that others could have a decent life.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RButler
"Fasten your seatbelts, ...
20 hours ago (3:17 AM)
I can imagine that the right thinks Issa is a 'hard hitting' whatever and 'that's what we need' or some such BS.
22 hours ago (1:45 AM)
issa is dangerous. He's a spokesman for corporate wrong doing, his job is to serve the people, not the corporatio­ns.
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
13 hours ago (10:47 AM)
"He begs to differ"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sjcarl
23 hours ago (12:31 AM)
Thank you, Rep. Cummings.
23 hours ago (12:31 AM)
Most of them (politicia­ns) are bought and paid for.

And we the people pay the price.

Personally­, I consider much of what they do economic treason.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyleewonder
7 hours ago (4:47 PM)
I agree, there should be no lobbyist on the hill, and every one running for office should have a set amount of money to run on and it that runs out, oh well.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
24 hours ago (11:55 PM)
Elijah Cummings and Jim Clyburn; two public servants that make me proud to be a Democrat.
17 hours ago (6:35 AM)
George Mitchell, Paul Wellstone, Hillary Clinton, Shirley Chisholm, FDR, Jimmy Carter (yes, him too), Jim Webb, Al Franken, the list goes on for me. There are many Democrats whose service and ideals make me proud to support them. Put Elizabeth Warren on that list and Obama for putting her there.

If it werent for the whole dic-pic thing, Weiner would be there too, how sad.

Have a great day!
10:46 PM on 6/07/2011
I truly love watching Elijah Cummings in subcommitt­ee and committee hearings.
What a great voice for the people of this country!
Elijah, any chance of you running for President? (I'll start a campaign office TODAY!)
Bernie Sanders, Colin Powell, Liz Warren, and Ron Paul would make great running mates and cabinet members - by the way.
10:45 PM on 6/07/2011
Great article. Issa might have been able to stay below the radar and do his dirty work for personal corporate donors but then he got cocky and went after Professor Warren (with the help of McHenry) in a shameless attack that made headlines. Now he is exposed for the rat that he is.
wendy scott
never believe generalizations
10:41 PM on 6/07/2011
Rep.Cummin­gs is a good man. I love his quite confidence and how doesn't let the petulant children on the committee get away with anything. I've watched a few hearings where the Republican­s interrupt as soon as someone tries to give an indepth answer or one that they don't like.They are incapable of actual governing or doing anything other than furthering their corporate masters.