July 4, 1861 -- exactly a hundred and fifty years ago -- witnessed the reading aloud, on the floor of Congress, of Abraham Lincoln's Message to Congress in Special Session.
The circumstantial appeal of Lincoln's message turned on his defense of the Union against the threat posed by secession, and that is the part most people have in mind when they recall the most famous words of the address: "This is essentially a People's contest." Lincoln was speaking for democracy. He was also speaking for a Union, popular in character and progressive in direction, as the heart of all future hopes for democracy.
Another part of the Special Message matters more to us today. For Lincoln saw an unresolvable tension between the constitution of a democratic republic and the policies of aggrandizement and intemperate self-interest that lead from the manners of freedom to the slavish love of power. He spoke of the difference between the work of establishing a constitutional republic and the longer task of maintaining it. But maintaining it against what? Lincoln's answer was always the same: against the internal pressure of greed, and the external pressure of war. The predicament of the country in 1861, he said, "forces us to ask: 'Is there, in all republics, this inherent, and fatal weakness? Must a government, of necessity, be too strong for the liberties of its own people, or too weak to maintain its own existence?'"
We are now ten years into a policy shared by two successive administrations to plant a new understanding of the spirit of the laws in America. That policy has pretended there is a "trade-off" between liberty and security, and that in a time of crisis, security ought to have the upper hand. The Cheney-Bush and Obama administrations have accustomed us to laws and language concerned above all with the "protection" of citizens -- as if there were something higher or more worth protecting than the liberty that is guaranteed by our laws and the framework of laws, the Constitution.
Today, as in Lincoln's day, we are involved in "a struggle for maintaining ...that form, and substance of government, whose leading object is, to elevate the condition of men -- to lift artificial weights from all shoulders -- to clear the paths of laudable pursuit for all -- to afford all, an unfettered start, and a fair chance, in the race of life." Yet the main peril in that struggle today comes not from any foreign power capable of destroying us from without, but the lapse of thought and faith that threatens us now from within. We are divided between two parties: one that thinks government should be used for nothing but wars, another that thinks government should be used for wars (whether justified or not) in order to prove the value of government for other purposes as well.
Over the past decade we have taken many long steps across the divide that separates a republic from an empire. The recovery of our proper ground depends on our seeing again the rightness of Lincoln's recoil from wars that are not wars of necessity. The words of his Special Message leave an incitement, too, by listing the goods he valued above the new forms of power and luxury that war can add to life. Elevating the condition of men. Lifting artificial weights from all shoulders. Clearing the paths of laudable pursuit for all. By doing this at home, we offer an example to those who would try it abroad. As Lincoln said in other words in other places, that is the only honest way for a democracy to advance the cause of democracy.
Partisan US politics could derail recovery
She's sharp, savvy, and stirring up US politics
Why extremist base politics are the real obstacle to US gay rights
US politics aflame in angry rhetoric over debt feud
Alexander says partisan politics pose threat to US
Share your Comment:
The Republican
This is the party that is insisting on dictating to doctors what they must say to their patients, and that wants the government to determine who can marry and who cannot.
This is party that is for government to stay away from corporate profits but to step in with taxpayers dollars to cover massive losses (“too big to fail”).
The right clamors about small government
When it comes to government limiting the freedom of great corporatio
Likewise, they want a weak government when it comes to providing basic protection
Small government is just a rhetorical weapon to use in the pursuit of their consistent purpose: constructi
No to a safety net for average American families. Yes to war in an oil-rich part of the world. Yes to a government big enough to impose the morality of their theocratic allies.
Every sentence you wrote can easily be changed from "republica
the gop always says righteous, easy-to-un
they live on mythology and appeal to people for whom the truth is too disturbing
they are swindlers and strip-mine
Now, the Republican
Obama pushed health care reform as a foundation stone for solving the long term debt problem. The Tea Party votes out Democrats and in conservati
What is the explanatio
1) Corporatio
2) The establishm
3) The establishm
But yes, the military has been, and will continue to be, used for the enrichment of the ruling class. And this class is not confined to the republican party, despite what might be said to the contrary. History has proven that this is not a single party phenomenon
You're correct, it's supposed to be a constituti
Well said.
Founder George Washington also handed all citizens the keys to maintainin
A couple of quotes from Washington
"Towards the preservati
On those who would try to divide and conquer the American people:
"The alternate domination of one faction over another...
Very smart man, our first President.
We can. It's called the vote. We simply don't use it properly (i.e., we keep voting for the same two parties).
Lincoln was in the peculiar position of fighting a war for people in whom he had no confidence
We became an imperial power so long ago that it's not memorable. Ask the native americans.
Clearly it is selfishnes
In the first "guilded age," 1850 - 1930 robber barons imported cheap labor from abroad to exploit, gaining great wealth for themsleves
But in the last two generation
The saddest part of the last forty years in America is that unlike the "oldern days" of 1850-1930, things that happend in old history books to ignorant, uneducated people, this latest "guilded age" has occured right in the middle of the "informati
Some (very small amount of) U.S. citizens work very hard to dominate the remaining U.S. citizens to take all the wealth and resources for themselves
Good grief.