HSE Boocoo Too

Home | Classifieds | Place an Ad | Public Notices | Subscriber Services | Coupons | Chambers | Phone Book | Real Estate | Galleries | Obits | e-News | RSS | Contact Us
The Prescott Daily Courier | Prescott, Arizona

home : latest news : elections July 09, 2011


7/5/2011 10:12:00 PM
Prescott City Council: Suttles says more collaboration is necessary
Suttles
Suttles
Mary Ann Suttles
Age: 67

Length of time in Prescott: 37 years

Occupation: Retired from Sears; went back to work there part-time a year and a half ago


Cindy Barks
The Daily Courier


This is the second in a series of Prescott mayoral candidate profile articles.



PRESCOTT - During her 12 years on the Prescott City Council, Mary Ann Suttles has seen four mayors come and go, and all have come from outside the ranks of the council.

Suttles would like to change that trend.

With three terms of council service behind her, she maintains that she would bring a level of experience other mayors have not had.

"I served with Daiton Rutkowski, Rowle Simmons, Jack Wilson, and Marlin Kuykendall, and nobody ever came from the council," Suttles said.

That meant that each new mayor had to take the time to become familiar with city operations, she said.

"It's the learning curve - every time a new mayor comes in, it starts all over again," said Suttles, one of three candidates vying for the mayor's post in the August primary. "From the council, you're there, so you know the issues."

Her time serving under the various mayors also has given Suttles an insight into how she would do the job. She says she would take something from most of the mayors with whom she has served.

"I would take the humor and looseness of Daiton, and the business part of Rowle and also the communication part of it," Suttles said. "There wasn't anything from Wilson. (And with Kuykendall), anything was better than Wilson. We needed to get out of the negativity."

Even so, Suttles is critical of the job Kuykendall is doing, maintaining that the current mayor has taken on too many of the city management duties.

"He's here from 7 or 8 in the morning until 6 at night," Suttles said of Kuykendall. "We pay (city employees) to do their jobs. We've been whittling away at the acting city manager that we have now."

Suttles attributes the problem, in part, to the January 2011 departure of former City Manager Steve Norwood. "It could have been a perfect storm - a strong mayor, and a manager leaving," she said.

Suttles sees herself as taking a more collaborative approach as mayor. "People govern differently," she said. "What you've got to try to do is you've got to get the buy-in."

She says her experience with retail sales would help her as mayor. "When I was in retail, you take information in, and you send some out," she said. "It has to be an exchange."

When dealing with city staff, she said, "I have never, ever gone toe-to-toe with anyone or called anybody names."

After moving to Prescott in the 1970s with her husband and two children, Suttles said she got involved in Little League, which ultimately led to her interest in local politics.

"My husband said, 'Mary Ann, you're going to have to find something else to do,' " she said.

She served her first term on the City Council from 1991 to 1995, and then left to run for Yavapai County Supervisor. After two unsuccessful supervisor runs, she returned to city politics in 2003, winning two consecutive terms.

"You either really like politics or you don't," she said. "I like it."

As mayor, Suttles said she would work to shore up flagging revenues.

"I was really concerned about our last census - that we lost population," she said. "We don't have that hook to keep people here. We've got to get something in to fill that void."

Through the years, Suttles has been involved with the Frontier Days Rodeo Association, the Phippen and Sharlot Hall museums, and she currently serves as chair of the Central Yavapai Metropolitan Planning Organization.



113106 YCCA License or Unlicensed
Related Stories:
• Prescott City Council: Kuykendall touts council continuity in run for 2nd term
• Prescott City Council: Thurston says independent voice is crucial for mayor



Reader Comments

Posted: Friday, July 08, 2011
Article comment by: Wake up Council! They need help.

Nice to hear smart remarks from our city councilmen. Shows their level.

Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: What Ever

Hey Reilly, I'd rather have the clumsy "conservative" local leadership provided by the current council/mayor, over the hapless "liberal" local leadership offered by the likes of Wilson. But having said that, for you to call people you don't even know "cowards" is simply a stupid thing to do. Some of us have good reason to not use our actual names when we comment. According to your logic, our votes should be made public too, lest we be too cowardly to tell others who we vote for. Right?

Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: J. J.

Adding to Ms VanGalio's list & Ronnie R.'s
Local Government Leaders should be diplomatic. You know like in tactful?!?


Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: Prescott Taxpayer Rocks!

Thank you Prescott Taxpayer for pointing that out! I checked out that article from the Courier archives - didn't know our used carsaleman Mayor had multiple bankruptcies! Council Entertainment is absolutely correct. ONLY IN PRESCOTT are people with these kinds of backgrounds elected to public office.

Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: PRESCOTT TAXPAYER

With regard to "Council Entertainment" comments, see the Courier article of August 28,2009 entitled "Kuykendall defends past business problems"..

Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: captain crunch

Wow once again in my 2nd home town that I vote in and have lived in for 30 years, more of the same, Those that think they can do better than others but dare not throw there hat into the ring. Oh of course Mr. Reilly past councilman that no longer lives in the city has a lot to say. I bet he is P.O.'d that maybe the mayor did not help him or his company get some contracts with the city. From my take in watching from the past if you did not agree with Tom you were on his list. Maryanne seems to have the same mind set. When I get back from the other mile hi city I will use my time to update myself on all the petty things that seem to have cropped up in Prescott. Oh just thinking after reading dcourier, who in their right mind would vote for someone that never has taken time to care and then vote. Sounds like sour grapes to me. The choice for Mayor becomes more certain.

Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: ronnie r.

I'll add to Marianne Vangalio' list
candidates should be required to take at least one course in political science so as to serve a city with some intelligence!


Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: suzi bell higgins

I wouldn't vote for Suttles or Kukendall, as far as I'm concerned they get too personal, when they should not.

Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: Dianne Kuzminski

I didn't realize being a clerk at Sears qualifies someone for handling town budgets etc. Being in attendance doesn't mean knowing what's going on

Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: Cannot Resist

@reasons not to run-- "good things you have learned from Marlin such as passion, how to make sacrifices, how to move people forward, how to be a servant leader, thoughtfulness, humor, hard work, and willing to spend the time, and energy to lead Prescott."

ROTFLMAO- I have not read such fawning drivel about a politician, since my college Political science classes studied Stalin/Hitler era propaganda and personality cults.


Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: Really .

@ Tom Reilly:
Dismiss some of us as cowards all you like, because it's really none of your business who we are. You aren't anyone important. So why don't you address Wilson's question? Or are you just another coward yourself?
Wilson is absolutely correct about municipal elections being non-partisan. At least he *knows* how local elections work, what's your excuse? The fact that people like you use partisanship even in places where it doesn't apply is quite telling. Maybe you should just stop talking, pal.


Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: A bit of a rebuttal

@ Council Entertainment - Vote for educated & professional representation...ya think??? It certainly hasn't been done it the past so perhaps we should foray into that territory now, however, I’m not sure our list of candidates allow for that drastic measure.

@ Gooding – You’re one to talk about negativity

@ Tom Reilly – Nice use of the underutilized word "charlatan"


Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: Is temperament a major factor in a leader - in this case a town mayor?

Mary Ann is generally pretty laid back. Hate to say it but sometimes she reminds me of the lazy, hazy days of John Steward. Who sat through the council meetings typing everything into his lap top ... then at the end of the meeting asked some inane, puzzling question. Just to let the world know he was present. Mary Ann's questions are usually more to the point. Less convoluted than Lamerson's. Most often to Nietupski about change orders. But they usually could be answered by her if she really thought about it. The present mayor, on the other hand, is notoriously arrogant, over-reacts to any criticism or even minor disagreements with his agenda. His response, or rather non-response, to the mural fiasco was a mistake. .... It might have been long ago been OK for a car dealer - today it is unconscionable as a city leader. His management style is basically old fashioned. His priorities have been terrible. Our roads are a mess, but golf carts and loaning money to a grocery store and hiring the PR firm he uses to do city business is fine. Is there some other way to run a town. There must be. A way without a mayor and city council?

Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2011
Article comment by: Jack Wilson

To Tom Reilly,
I did read the article, it contains no example of Mary Ann exhibiting leadership skills. As for the protest, you also have that wrong. I did not have a bag over my head. Other that slamming people, how about answering mt question?


Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: tom Reilly

Wilson,Read the article man, you will know where she led.
As for partisanship....your tactics speak for themselves. The bag over your head at a minor protest...people need leaders , not charlatans.
With you.. I am done.


Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: Glenn J. Gooding

Why all the negativity? The people voting will decide! Read what the candidates offer and be sure to vote!

Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: Jack Wilson

To Tom Reilly,
Last time I checked the Prescott municipal elections are non-partisan, so your allusion to party affiliation is a red herring. Regarding leadership: “People ask the difference between a leader and a boss. . . The leader works in the open, and the boss in covert. The leader leads, and the boss drives. ~Theodore Roosevelt” Your claim Mary Ann has a record of leadership. Specifically doing what?


Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: Tom Reilly

Typically the comments from those who do not leave their names are dismissed a cowards. It is no surprise that some of those extol the virtures of Wilson.
Mary Ann is right on about Marlin, a nice guy but he has zero notion of what inclusion into decision making means. His way or the none. The man has not learned the difference between command and leadership. Mary Ann is a leader. Proven, tried, and succeeded. Marlin could give less than a hoot about what you think. He is what matters. He was only to run for one term to rid us of the Chicago Dem.
He did that...aparently ruling ,not leading has gotten to him.


Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: Council Entertainment

While being a former councilman from another out of state community, I have always found enjoyment over this towns' politics. Rather than going to meetings and voting on issues, this council seems to want to be employees and run the city as if they are the manager or department heads. Not knowing the background of most of them, I wonder how many members were really successful in their own industry and now that they retained this position, they are irresponsibly running the city. I'm wondering, as voters, whether we should start voting for educated and professional representation.

Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: To F.W. Cummings

His name is Marlin, as in big fish - in a very little pond.......

Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: Marianne Elizabeth Vangalio

Communities deserve local leaders who are up-to-date regarding currant topics, controversial points, stats, debilitating issues, local laws ~ willing to self-educate.
People who are committed/dedicated to the elected seat.
Communities deserve local leaders who set partisan aside for the enhancement of community.
Popularity is important but only to a small degree. Oftentimes its those who are the least popular do the most good for the people they serve because they are less likely to be indulgent.
Communities deserve a local leader who isn't easily alarmed via: peer pressure.
Communities deserve a local leader with high integrity and moral thread.
Refusing to buckle when he/she stands alone in their convictions regarding what's best for the majority.
Communities deserve local leaders who genuinely care about the community they serve. Taking a personal interest in the environment and embrace the need to protect the environment to the best of their ability without wavering.
Communities deserve local leaders who will respect and fight for each of us to keep what we have earned.

TO ALL VOTERS ~ Don't take the right to vote lightly. Attempt to know the candidate your contemplating casting your vote for. Avoid being like politicians who enact 1000 page bills without reading them.
Though registered a Republican I vote according to principle not party. Some might say that would make me a Judas. I say it makes for a responsible voter.


Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: Same stuff different day

Mary Ann seems very nice, but also seems to actually understand very little about the business of the city (witness her questions on virtually any subject, even the most routine). I think she's over her head where she is already.

Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: Sir Walter Scott

We didn't actually "lose population" in the last census a lot of Latino residents were afraid to register for the census after Norwood, Blair and Hanna took down the census banner in Spanish. The hostile environment toward the "illegals" in Prescott convinced these residents that it was not in their best interests to register. Prescott lost a lot of money because of this!

I guess we won't have to worry about the Council "micromanaging" the City Departments any more if Mary Ann gets in. It's very scary that she finds qualities in Daiton and Rowle to emulate - at least I don't think either of them were ever accused of working 60-80 hours a week (or even in a month!).


Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: keen observer

Suttles' comments make a good case for her rejection. After her years on the council, she clearly does not get it. The job of the mayor is not to stand aside and let bureaucrats take decisions and run the city. It is to provide leadership, make proposals for the future, and conduct the public business in an honest, open, and transparent manner. It also is to be sure that appointed staff are following policy and responsive to the needs of citizens.
Whether she recognizes it or not, Suttles has been a part of the go-along, get-along, backscratching, good-ole-boy governance of Prescott. She was reelected last time only because she publicly apologized for her role in the Lowe's fiasco.
Strange that she should criticize Wilson, who was not a politician and who was independent of the local insiders. He was an honest man trying to serve the city rather than the gang of local developers, campaign contributors, and others who have dominated this community over the years.
Rather than criticizing by name the former mayors, she should address the big issues facing this city (and her own prior role in them):
The need for good jobs fixing our falling apart streets and local infrastructure better public safety and public services. She also should be held to account for her positions and votes taken regarding undeserved public subsidies for the TJ's developer the wasted money for the golf clubhouse and golf carts the Elks Theater mess and contract awards and overruns for favored developers.
Suttles is more of the same and would provide the opposite of the change needed here. It's always a sign of incompetence when candidates smear opponents or deal in personalities instead of proposing solutions to our city's problems.


Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Article comment by: reasons not to run

Maryann, here are some top reasons why you should not be running:
1) Because you feel you deserve it and you have stated this 2) Because your bff's expect you to. 3) Because you are trying to impress the people 4) Because you dislike the person running against you and you are angry
Marlin has devoted the time and energy to take our city upward and make improvements and you state that he spends too much time on the job. We should be so lucky. Marlin is deeply committed to this city and I am not sure you can motivate people and businesses to act together for the success of Prescott. It is shameful that you could not bring yourself to talking about the good things you have learned from Marlin such as passion, how to make sacrifices, how to move people forward, how to be a servant leader, thoughtfulness, humor, hard work, and willing to spend the time, and energy to lead Prescott.



  - Page 1 -  Page 2



Article Comment Submission Form
Article comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to the Use of Service section in our Terms of Use agreement. The email address and phone number you provide are for internal use and will not be visible to the public. The passcode below is not case-sensitive. You may post comments using a pseudonym or alias name and enter 000-0000 for the phone number.

Please keep comments succinct; 300 words or less is optimal. Comments that are excessively verbose, rambling or too long for reasonable review may not be posted.

Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

    Recently Commented     Most Viewed
Column: Forest policy must be proactive, sustainable (5 comments)
Blog: With gun ownership comes responsibility (22 comments)
Russell Pearce, sponsor of Arizona immigration law, faces recall (6 comments)
Letter: Employee impresses with helpfulness (2 comments)
Letter: Article stokes anti-Semitic flames (25 comments)






Quick Links
 •  Submit site feedback or questions

 •  Submit your milestone notice

 •  Submit your letter to the editor

 •  Submit a news tip or story idea

 •  Place a classified ad online now

Find It Features Blogs Milestones Extras Submit Other Publications Links
Classifieds | Public Notices | Subscriber Services | Real Estate | Merchants | Galleries | Obits | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Contact Us
113052 Bucky's/Yavapai (points palooza)

© Copyright 2011 Western News&Info;, Inc.® The Daily Courier is the information source for Prescott area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Prescott Newspapers, Inc. Prescott Newspapers Online is a service of Prescott Newspapers Inc. By using the Site, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Prescott Newspapers Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info;, Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2011 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved