Curtis Dahlgren
October 20, 2003
Evolution: The Thalidomide of social silver bullets
By Curtis Dahlgren

When people say, “It’s not about [such and such],” often that’s the very thing it’s ALL ABOUT. Believers in Darwinism often say that evolution isn’t about religion, or that it is “neutral on God.” Educator John Dewey, however, half a century after the publication of Darwin’s theory, said that evolution had “introduced a mode of thinking that in the end was bound to transform the logic of knowledge, and hence the treatment of morals, politics, and religion.” And I can picture him saying that with all the “neutrality” of Dan Rather announcing that the state of Tennessee had just gone for Al Gore in 2000.

One of the more honest Darwinists was Huxley, who made no secret of the fact that what evolution was “about” was freedom from traditional morals, for him and his friends. As for politics, Karl Marx wanted to dedicate “Das Kapital” to Darwin (his request was turned down), and as for religion, many theologians now insist that they are descended from some primate themselves.

An even bigger issue than the theory’s scientific accuracy is its ramifications. Though touted by early advocates as a social cure-all for everything from poverty to guilty consciences, its actual ramifications have been specific and horrific. Darwin’s Origin was published in 1859, and three years later, Russian writer Turgueniev described some of the consequences of the theory in Fathers and Children.

According to the Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th edition (“Nihilism”), the world’s first hippies weren’t those of the 1960s, but those in 1860s Russia, the forerunners of the Communist Revolution:

“Turgueniev had noticed a new and strikingly original type [of student] — young men and women in slovenly attire, who called in question and ridiculed the generally received convictions and respectable conventionalities of social life. . . . They reversed the traditional order of things even in trivial matters of external appearance, the males allowing the hair to grow long and the female adepts cutting it short. . . . [They] had raised themselves above the level of so-called public opinion, despised Philistine respectability, and rather liked to scandalize people still under the influence of what they considered antiquated prejudices. . . .

“Some of the Nihilists maintained that things were not yet ripe for a rising of the masses . . . that before attempting to overthrow the existing social organization some idea should be formed as to the order of things which should take its place [but] . . . in a brochure issued in 1874 one of the most influential leaders (Tkatchev) explained that the object of the revolutionary party should be, not the preparation of revolution in general, but the realization of it at the earliest possible moment, that it was a mistake to attach great importance to questions of future organization. . . .

“In accordance with the fashionable doctrine of evolution [my emphasis], the reconstruction of society on the tabula rosa might be left, it was thought, to the spontaneous action of natural forces.” So says the Britannica, and the tsar was assassinated in 1881 by those “hippies” (virtually 100 years to the month prior to the attempt on President Reagan’s life by someone influenced by our hippie movement). Violence and back-lashes to it culminated in the 1917 revolution.

The World & I, August 1999, ("Darwin's 'Origin' Transforms Culture") said this:

“The scientific search for truth takes place in a cultural context, and Darwin’s theorizing was no exception. He unconsciously absorbed many social and political values peculiar to his time, place, and class; and these values indirectly colored his ideas. . . . In their turn, social, political, and economic theorists appropriated features of Darwin’s evolutionary argument for their own constructs, some of which were strikingly different from Darwin’s values.”

The eugenics movement and the Bolshevist Revolution are only two examples. The evils of all the wars of the Dark Ages were only dwarfed by the deaths resulting directly from the dogma of the various proponents of Darwinism in the 20th century. Ironically, I found a Wisconsin license plate made in 1917 that outlasted Russian Communism and its attempt to wipe out the Bible and religion and to engineer a secular “New Soviet Man.”

Thomas Jefferson said, “I hold (without appeal to revelation) that when we take a view of the Universe, in its parts general or particular, it is impossible for the human mind not to perceive and feel a conviction of design, consummate skill, and indefinite power in every atom of its composition. . . . So irresistible are these evidences of an intelligent and powerful Agent that, of the infinite numbers of men who have existed thro’ all time, they have believed, in the proportion of a million at least to [one], in the hypothesis of an eternal pre-existence of a creator, rather than in that of self-existent Universe” (letter to John Adams, 4/11/1823).

The term Darwinizing had been coined in the 1700s to refer to theorizing done by Charles Darwin’s grandfather, so Jefferson had already heard it all and he still said that believers outnumbered non-believers a million to one. What’s foreboding about today’s secular movement is that John Dewey’s public schools have used more patience and systematic methods than Russia’s Bolshevists, and the scales are beginning to tilt in the direction of a million doubters for every true believer.

Is the evil genie out of the bottle for good? All the Founding Fathers could do is give the new Republic a shove in the right direction. The final fate of their high hopes is, without a doubt, up to you and me — if you are up to the task, so help us God.

© Curtis Dahlgren

Comments feature added August 14, 2011

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Curtis Dahlgren

Curtis Dahlgren is semi-retired in the frozen tundra of Michigan's U.P., and is the author of "Massey-Harris 101." His career has had some rough similarities to one of his favorite writers, Ferrar Fenton... (more)


Receive future articles by Curtis Dahlgren: Click here

Latest articles


Wes Vernon
Evicting Obama from the White House: how to do it

Amy Contrada
Huckabee: Governor Romney acted unconstitutionally on "gay marriage"

Henry Lamb
Rep. Herger is wrong about Agenda 21

Alan Caruba
The Looney Tunes version of the GOP campaigns

Larry Klayman
Have American leaders been bribed, again?

Barack Obama using scripture

Matt C. Abbott
Komen almost aborted by Planned Parenthood

Audrey Ignatoff
Welcome anti bullying law in New Jersey
  More columns


Michael Ramirez


RSS feeds



Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
J. Matt Barber
Kelly Bartlett
Michael M. Bates
. . .
[See more]
Nicole George

Sister sites