March bulls give way to April bears in emerging markets
The dust has settled on a scintillating first quarter for emerging markets but the cross-asset rally of the first three months has already run out of steam. A survey by Societe Generale of 69 EM investors shows that over half are bearish — at least for the near-term.
This marks quite a turn-around from the March survey, when 80 percent of investors declared themselves bullish on emerging markets. What’s more, investors are currently running very little risk and 47 percent of hedge fund respondents (these make up half the survey) feel they are over-invested in EM. (The following graphic shows the findings — click on it to enlarge)
Almost a quarter of the hedge fund and real money investors are neutral tactically on the market, compared to just 4.5 percent last month. Serious optimism has dried up, SocGen commented:
Looking at the distribution of answers, it is quite clear that the mega-bullish investor on EM has disappeared at this point.
The return of worries about the euro zone debt crisis, U.S. growth and a slowdown in China have all contributed to a higher degree of pessimism on financial markets. It’s not all gloom though. Looking at emerging markets over the next 3 months, sentiment does pick up, with 64 percent of investors bullish. So this falling out of love with EM could be a temporary blip.
Only 13 percent of investors were more bearish on a 3-month time horizon than over the next two weeks. That included 83 percent of real money investors that believed in an improvement in the GEM outlook from two weeks to three months.
Hard times for EM in QE-less world of higher US yields
Now that the Fed appears to have dashed any lingering hopes for an imminent QE3, what’s next for emerging markets? Most observers put this year’s stellar performance of emerging bonds, currencies and equities largely down to the various money-printing or cheap money operations in the developed world. That’s kept core government bond yields bumping along near record lows and benefited higher-yielding emerging assets.
Many would add that in any case a solid economic recovery in the United States should be fairly good news for the rest of the world too. Not so, says HSBC. It argues that a better U.S. outlook is not necessarily good news for emerging markets simply because the side effect of economic improvement is a stronger dollar and higher Treasury yields and that’s an environement in which EM assets tend to underperform.
For an example, it looks back to the days between November 2010 and Feb 2011 when signs of improvement in the U.S. economy steepened the U.S. yield curve, pushing the spread between 2-year/10-year Treasuries almost 100 bps wider. Flows to emerging markets dipped sharply, the following graph shows:
Money did continue to flow into emerging local bonds and equities in this period, albeit at a slower pace. But from local bonds the return was negative, HSBC notes. That could be an indication of what’s to come:
The carry trade is not dead yet but the change in tone by the Fed suggests it may have passed its best days.
Headwinds for emerging markets may in fact be greater now than 18 months ago. U.S. growth expectations haven’t budged much HSBC says: the bank expects U.S. growth under 2 percent this year and in 2013. On the other hand emerging market output gaps are much tighter than they were 18 months back and oil prices are higher. That makes the outlook for emerging local currency bonds more challenging, especially as a stronger dollar will give EM currencies less room to rise.
Should ongoing improvements in U.S. data result in further hawkish moves from the Fed and if such changes see U.S. yields rise further, we would expect this to be positive for the dollar vs EM . The combination of a potentially more inflationary backbone and a more challenging backdrop for EM FX might become a headwind for local rates.
All in the price in China?
It’s been a while since Chinese stocks earned investors fat profits. Last year the Shanghai market lost 22 percent and the compounded return on equity investments there since 1993 is minus 3 percent. This year too China has underwhelmed, rising less than 3 percent so far. Broader emerging equities on the other hand have just concluded their best first quarter since 1992, with gains of over 13 percent.
Given all that, bears remain a surprisingly rare breed in China. A Bank of America/Merrill Lynch’s monthly survey found it was fund managers’ biggest emerging markets overweight in March and that has been the case for some months now. Clearly, hope dies last.
Driving many of these allocations is valuation. China’s equity market has always tended to trade at a premium to emerging markets but in recent months it has swung into a discount, trading at 9.2 times forward earnings or 10 percent below broader emerging markets. MSCI’s China index is also trading almost 25 percent below its own long-term average, according to this graphic from my colleague Scott Barber (@scottybarber):
There are reasons for the cheapness of course. The economy is slowing and looks on track for its weakest quarter since 2009. Recent corporate earnings have disappointed and there are worries over local government debt and bad loans at banks. The property sector remains a worry and it is unclear if the PBOC will ease monetary policy. But many reckon the problems are in the price.
JPMorgan Asset Management for instance has changed its historic bias against Chinese stocks in its EM fund. China is now the fund’s biggest overweight, more than 5 percent above the MSCI benchmark. Client portfolio manager Emily Whiting expects the market to rebound strongly once investors start unwinding their doomsday bets:
Historically China has been an underweight for us as we always felt the valuations too rich against the broader emerging markets opportunity set.. Now it is our largest overweight country position, we feel the market has priced in too much bad news and it’s created buying opportunities…. it’s a great environment for stock pickers.
Urbanization sweet spots
It’s a hard slog sometimes looking for new and surprising sources of global economic growth that have not already be heavily discounted by global investors, especially in the uncertain world of 2012. It’s been as hard of late to find new arguments to invest in China and quite a few people suggesting the opposite.
But a Credit Suisse report out on Tuesday homed in on worldwide urbanization trends to find out where this well-tested driver of economic activity was likely to have most impact int he 21st century. For a start, the big aggregate numbers are as dramatic as you’d imagine. More than half of the world’s population now lives in urban areas, crossing that milestone for the first time in 2009. And, accordingly to United Nations projections, urban dwellers will account for 70 percent of humanity by 2050. As recently as 1950, 70 percent of us were country folk.
CS economists Giles Keating and Stefano Natella crunch the numbers and reckon that, typically, a five percent rise in urban populations is associated with a 10 percent rise in per capita economic activity. Crunching them further, they find that there’s a “sweet spot” as the urban share of the population is moving from 30 percent to 50 percent and per capita GDP growth peaks. Emerging markets as a whole are currently about 45 percent, with non-Japan Asia and sun-Saharan Africa standing out. Developed economies are as high as 75 percent.
Adding other variables to this “sweet spot” — such as overall population size, relatively equal income distributions, falling levels of corruption and capital market access — and CS come up with a list of favoured countries for those following this theme and they include China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Not the BRICs in terms of clever anagrams, but an interesting collection of hotspots that, significantly, still has both China and India as prominent.
We find that, as countries urbanize, there is typiclaly an associated incremental gain in the consumption share of GDP, which we argue is particulary relevant in the case of China
Asian bonds may suffer most if QE on ice
Bonds issued in emerging market currencies have been red-hot favourites with investors this year, garnering returns of 8.3 percent so far in 2012. But for some the happy days are drawing to a close — U.S. Treasury yields are nudging higher as the U.S. recovery gains a foothold and the Fed holds back from more money printing for now at least. That could spell trouble for emerging markets across the board (here’s something I wrote on this subject recently) but, according to JP Morgan, it is Asian bond markets that may bear the brunt.
Their graphic details weekly flows to local bond funds as measured by EPFR Global (in million US$). As on cue, these flows have tended to spike whenever central banks have pumped in cash. (Click the graphic to enlarge.)
Over the past several years, inflows have driven local curves to very flat levels, but current levels of flatness are not sustainable if/when inflows begin to slow, let alone reverse.As there is a clear correlation between the Fed’s “QE periods” and large inflows into Asian markets, we think the next few months will be difficult for Asian bonds markets (JPM writes)
JP Morgan says risks are greatest for Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand because that’s where foreign ownership ratios are largest – in Indonesia for instance foreigners hold a third of local debt. Deficits in these three countries are also rising meaning debt issuance is rising faster than elsewhere, the bank warned. It advises clients to be underweight Asian local debt (countered by overweights in Latin America and emerging Europe)
Asian currencies face risks too –from China. The yuan is up 30 percent since mid-2005 but ended March with its first quarterly loss since 2009 and many reckon China, fearful of an exports slowdown will not permit any more big rises for now. Asian governments will have to fall into step if they want their own exports to compete. And that, JPM says, is robbing the region’s currencies of a major support anchor.
A Hungarian default?
More on Hungary. It’s not hard to find a Hungary bear but few are more bearish than William Jackson at Capital Economics.
Jackson argues in a note today that Hungary will ultimately opt to default on its debt mountain as it has effectively exhausted all other mechanisms. Its economy has little prospect of strong growth and most of its debt is in foreign currencies so cannot be inflated away. Austerity is the other way out but Hungary’s population has been reeling from spending cuts since 2007, he says, and is unlikely to put up with more.
How did other highly indebted countries cope? (lets leave out Greece for now). Jackson takes the example of Indonesia and Thailand. Both countries opted for strict austerity after the 1997 Asian crisis and resolved the debt problem by running large current account surpluses. This worked because the Asian crisis was followed by a period of buoyant world growth, allowing these countries to boost exports. But Hungary’s key export markets are in the euro zone and are unlikely to recover anytime soon.
The other example is Argentina. It too recovered strongly from its 2001 crisis but its way out was default. Capital Economics writes:
There are arguments for why, in Hungary’s case, default might appear to be an attractive option. The economy runs both a current account surplus and a primary surplus (i.e. government spending is lower than receipts before interest payments are taken into account). This means that if the Hungarian government were to default and were to be barred from borrowing from abroad, it would still not be forced into drastic fiscal austerity or a painful current account adjustment via reduced domestic demand.
Moreover, the note says:
Sujata Rao, let me explain why this isn’t going to happen, a default that is. It would tarnish the PMs otherwise flawless reputation and image.
He rather resort to unorthodox financial strategies that slowly makes the people that can, move out of the country, and the rest will suffer the consequences of these strategies.
Hungary’s plan to get some cash in the bank
Hungary says it might borrow money from global bond markets before it lands a long-awaited aid deal with the International Monetary Fund. That pretty much seems to suggest Budapest has given up hope of getting the IMF cash any time soon. Given the fund has already said it won’t visit Hungary in April, that view would seem correct.
There is some logic to the plan.
Hungary desperately needs the cash — it must find over 4 billion euros just to repay external debt this year.
It is also an attractive time to sell debt. Appetite for emerging market debt remains strong. Emerging bond yield premiums over U.S. Treasuries have contracted sharply this year and stand near seven-month lows. Moreover, U.S. Treasury yields may rise, potentially making debt issuance more costly in coming months.
For Hungary’s government , the idea of a successful bond sale is particularly attractive as this will at a stroke improve its bargaining position with the IMF. That’s bad news, says Tim Ash, RBS head of emerging European research:
The problem is that getting cash in the bank may actually reduce the likelihood of the government actually finally cutting a deal with the IMF, so arguably increases market risk over the slightly longer term.
He concedes however:
Three snapshots for Tuesday
The German ZEW economic sentiment index for March smashed expectations, coming in at 22.3 against the Reuters poll of 10.0. Over the last couple of years the German 10 year Bund yield has tended to track the ZEW, however this has broken down with yields staying below 2% despite the rebound in economic sentiment.
Improving earnings momentum has been backing up the rally in equities with fewer analysts taking the hatchet to earnings forecasts. The chart below shows that the 3-month average revisions ratio (the number of earnings upgrades minus downgrades as a percent of the total) looks to have turned back towards positive – especially in Europe.
Are emerging markets joining the dividend race?. As this chart of Datastream equity indices shows, the payout ratio for emerging market equities is now above that of the US. Traditionally seen as a growth-based investment, is this another sign of emerging market equities moving closer into line with developed?
Oil prices — Geopolitics or growth?
It’s the economy, stupid. Or isn’t it?
Brent crude has risen 15 percent since the end of last year, focusing people’s minds on the potential this has to choke off the recovery in world growth. But some reckon it is the recovery that’s at least partly responsible for the surging oil prices — economic data from United States and Germany has been strong of late. There are hopes that France and the United Kingdom may escape recession after all. And growth in the developing world has been robust.
Geopolitics of course is playing a role as an increasing number of countries boycott Iranian oil and fret over a possible military strike by Israel on Iran’s nuclear installations. But Deutsche Bank analysts point out that world equity markets, an efficient real-time gauge of growth sentiment, have risen along with oil prices.
Their graphic (below) shows a remarkably close relationship between oil prices and the S&P 500. Click to enlarge
Deutsche says:
We find it hard to believe that a genuine concern about a real risk of war would have accompanied a 4.7 percent gain in the S&P 500 index during February to a post-Lehman high.
Emerging beats developed in 2012
Robust growth from the emerging market basket in January was always going to be tough to beat, but research from February’s gains show just how strong these markets are performing against developed ones, and not just from the traditional BRICs either, research from S&P Indices shows.
Egypt has been a prime example. Following a bout of political unrest and subsequent removal of Hosni Mubarak after nearly 30 years in power, Egypt’s market returns have rocketed, climbing 15.3 percent in February on top of January’s 44.3 percent take-off.
Thailand, Chile, Turkey and Colombia are also on the to-watch list as these emerging lights have all flashed double-digit returns in the first two months of this year, while all twenty emerging markets included in the S&P data were up, gaining an average of 6.62 percent, making gains in the year-to-date a mouth-watering 18.95 percent.
Compare that with developed market returns of 4.6 percent in February, led by Nordic countries in particular Norway with (13.8 percent) in February, Denmark (13.5 percent) and Sweden (10.2 percent). Yet returns in developed markets were dragged down by Israel (-1.9 percent) and Greece (-2 percent). Overall developed markets grew 10.3 percent in the first two months of the year.
So taken together – equity markets have gained $1.6 trillion in February, which when added to January’s bullish run, clawing back all $3 trillion worth of losses in 2011 leading to the best start the S&P 500 has had since 1987.
Optimism should be checked, however. High oil prices supported by geopolitical pressure at the prospect of an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities and subsequent knock-out of a 3.5 million barrel per day production of crude oil could start to have a negative effect on markets, while Europe still faces high levels of debt and the challenge of reducing deficits, which could create a drag on the growth of emerging economies.
S&P says:
