More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
GET UPDATES FROM Arianna Huffington
 

The Slow News Movement

Posted: 06/22/2012 8:00 am

Each year, the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity gathers thousands of innovative thinkers and practitioners in advertising and media from around the world to talk about what's new and what's next in our brave new digital world. Last year I spoke about one of the most exciting developments online: the fact that the Internet has come out of its adolescent stage and is growing up into a place where our online and our offline lives have merged -- where the qualities we care most about offline are increasingly reflected in our experience online. And where, among all the random searching that defined the Internet's early years, something new has emerged: a search for greater meaning.

On Monday, I took the stage again with Roy Sekoff, HuffPost's founding editor and president of our soon-to-be-launched video streaming network, HuffPost Live. And what was on my mind was the speed with which the Internet is heading in this new direction. A world of too much data, too many choices, too many possibilities and too little time is forcing us to decide what we really value. And, more and more, people and innovative companies are recognizing that we actually have a life beyond our gadgets. That is why one of the most exciting features of Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference last week was Do Not Disturb, the new iPhone feature designed to get you off your iPhone altogether.

And Huffington is definitely a manifestation of this longing to disconnect from the hurly-burly of our hyper-connected lives and join the slow news movement.

So here are some of this issue's highlights: Katie Bindley on the psychology behind online romance scams; Michael Calderone on Politico's growth since its upstart days way back in the 2008 election; Sharon Carty on the young designers, engineers and scientists pumping new life into Detroit's auto industry; Peggy Drexler on the risks and rewards of raising children to believe they're all winners, all the time; Gary Hart on the possible consequences -- both legal and illegal -- of the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision; and Priyamvada Natarajan, who asks "Can Science Be Crowd-Sourced?"

There's also Mike Hogan's review of Beasts of the Southern Wild (which won big at another festival in Cannes), a Q&A; with Meghan McCain, and a "Greatest Person of the Week" feature on Dr. Michael Good, a Marietta, GA, veterinarian who takes in stray animals who would otherwise have little chance of getting medical attention or being adopted.

I'm delighted that Huffington's first issue entered the world last week to great reviews. On the morning Huffington launched, I gave the commencement address at the all-girls Nightingale School in New York. I told the young women in the graduating class the story of HuffPost's birth seven years ago, and the negative reviews that greeted its arrival. You don't have to buy into the negative reviews, I told them. And just the same, you can't lean on the positive ones.

So, here at Huffington, our goal is to keep learning, keep growing, and keep listening to you, our readers, about what you want more and what you want less of. And to stay true to the qualities of storytelling, engagement, and community -- the kind of timeless qualities that, I have a feeling, will continue to resonate no matter how our online lives change.

This post appears in the June 24, 2012 issue of Huffington.

Add your voice to the conversation on Twitter: twitter.com/ariannahuff

 
 
 
FOLLOW MEDIA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 7
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HopeWFaith
We the People
1 hour ago ( 2:42 AM)
As a strong Huff Post reader/contributor via comments arena, I would greatly appreciate seeing NO MORE PORN-related naked pictures, teaser headlines, on the right side of the page, when I click onto the HP each day. It is insulting to ALL of US. Not just to women. I come to the HP for news, sharing my heartfelt desire for a better nation, a better economy, and what do I get lately? PORN-like photos and articles posted on the Front Page. Not that I would want them to be anywhere else either. To me this is one of the most degrading things you and the owners could have allowed to happen. I'm on the verge of never coming back, and hope this won't continue. That would be a shame, in my opinion.
4 hours ago (12:27 AM)
I like the idea of opt-in opportunities to slow the news down -Like Do Not Disturb - but I would like the option, not have the Powers that Be dictating what is good for me and what isn't. Sometimes, I like lots of news, let me decide how and when.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Franklin Smith
1 hour ago ( 2:50 AM)
Would you please explain how it is you can't (or don't) control the speed, timing and location of news now?

And how the "Powers that Be" dictate what is good for you and what isn't? You seem to be suggesting there is no control over the "off" button, mouse or TV remote control.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftbehind2000
Occupy Your LIFE.
4 hours ago (12:16 AM)
I know it is probably insane of me to even mention that most of the contraptions to which we are chained have OFF switches.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
8 hours ago ( 7:48 PM)
If you think that news is slow now, you should have seen it before the invention of the wheel. Sometimes news would happen and the observer would go to the top of the hill and shout the news to those down in the valley. They would hear the news and then shout it up to the next hill over, and on and on from hill to hill to valley and so on. The last group to hear the relayed news got nothing of the original news, as things garbled along each time and altered a little in the translation. But, when I look at our news casts today, I am not sure that anything has changed. Likely what we hear really didn't happen, either. And, look what happened about weapons of mass destruction. We were on the tenth valley from the original message and wound up killing thousands of people on bad information.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Franklin Smith
11 hours ago ( 4:42 PM)
"...and keep listening to you, our readers, about what you want more and what you want less of."

OK, I want fewer top-of-frontpage leading stories with gigantic 100-point headlines with accompanying huge photo. I want the words "crushed, slammed, smashed, shocking, outrageous, etc, etc" BANNED from all stories and headlines. I want ALL of the ridiculous appeals to prurient interest removed from the front page... it makes you look like a poor copy of the National Enquirer. I want you to stop updating the front page with automatic reloads. It's extremely aggravating to be scanning headlines when the entire page blanks out, then begins flickering and shuffling with new pics,etc. I want a MINIMUM of large thumbnail photos accompanying stories on the front page instead of nearly all of them as it is now.

Look at the front page of Politico. There is a reason that site is taken more serious than yours and it's not entirely because of content.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lowell Thompson
Artist, writer, recovering adman
12 hours ago ( 3:34 PM)
Welcome, Arianna!

Years ago I started adovcating for less news and more truth. In fact, I think the two are inextricably linked.

I'd go so far as to say "news"papers and "news"media should change their mission and names to "truth" papers and "truth"media. They should spend a lot less time competing with each other to get the quickest, fastest, latest "scoops" and much more time making sure what the truth is behind the stories.

Right?

http://buythecover.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
macmanchgo
"You don't need a weatherman...."
7 hours ago ( 8:56 PM)
Absolultely right, and yet lies are a bigger business and we now live in an age where corporations are eager to sacrifice the truth for money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
16 hours ago (12:07 PM)
If you value slow news...

Consider that concission encourages a rapid pace and thus system 1 thinking aka heuristic irrationality. This includes the designed concission of small comment boxes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karel Appel
13 hours ago ( 2:36 PM)
I read this fast. I read this slow. Outcome was the same: huh?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
13 hours ago ( 3:01 PM)
Exactly.  Your short response of "huh" speaks loudly.  
"Concision is the practice in broadcast journalism of ensuring that only contributors who are concise enough to make their point in a limited time, get the opportunity to appear."  
Concision limits information to shallow ideas that do not require a detailed explanation.  Typically this means conventional ideas.
My response is already stretching the text box.  If we converse back and forth - the interface provided by this site will become more and more restrictive until it completely blocks interaction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwilson1
17 hours ago (11:16 AM)
A 150 years ago a Jesuit priest wrote that Man's consciousness/awareness was evolving a million times faster then physical evolution. He said that the propose was to connect with others and that
eventually there will be invisible fibers like hair that connect us to one another. This is 150 years ago!

The internet was born...now we are just learning how to use it... after an exciting time playing with it's power to connect.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Leland
17 hours ago (10:35 AM)
Dear Ms Huffington: I have been writing the HuffPost staff about: On Saturday the Comment Moderation Que was in the low-hundreds on the articles about the President's "no deportation" decision.

Having a "conversation" makes a better Social experience. When the "Comments" are working well we can Comment back within 20 minutes.

How about enabling the
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnatUHD
11 hours ago ( 4:45 PM)
We should talk. I know things. About this place...
18 hours ago (10:14 AM)
Seems to me that SOME of the glow of the honeymoon era of the Internet is lessening as people become more comfortable with it (and somewhat more complacent about it with new technology being introduced to us at a break neck speeds). But news junkies will always be on the edge of their seats to get the continual fix of up to the minute news updates and breaking stories.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
18 hours ago ( 9:58 AM)
You're so smart
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fearthebetenoire
Lying's like 95% of what I do. In your job? Sure.
18 hours ago ( 9:40 AM)
Wow! We're killing print media so that we can rush to the internet to get the "latest" news, info, gossip, "knowledge," etc. -- and now "Huffington" is going to slow things down so that we can be more contemplative. That is a brilliant business proposition, mash up old school and cutting edge techno to try to reach the over-connected.

I admit that I will check it out.

But I have a feeling that when I want to slow down, I'll still click on "shut down."
17 hours ago (11:01 AM)
The news is already slowed down on the radio and TV networks. Sounds like an effort to exert more control by someone. If something happens on Friday, you will hear about it on Sunday through Tuesday. Then they only report about half of what is going on. At least on the internet comment sections other people report what they read abroad so you can learn what is going on.
lightnessandjoy
Is micro-bio a new disease?
14 hours ago ( 2:22 PM)
The slow news movement, she said, announcing "our soon-to-be-launched video streaming network, HuffPost Live."
18 hours ago ( 9:38 AM)
I want facts please not opinion. I every wild accusation marked out and many falsehoods exposed. As with the statement "Obama is attempting to destroy this country" to be followed by "the representative / senator /mayor said hysterically" in an obvious attempt to stoke fear and avoid the question. In this way you will become the ONLY REAL NEWS SOURCE. Why is it that every one just plays ball?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who Honest
19 hours ago ( 9:17 AM)
The ABC and CBS evening newscasts covered the contempt vote as well, however, neither saw fit to make it the lead story. It was particularly stunning that ABC's World News decided to lead with two reports on the weather before getting to the growing Obama administration scandal.

For ABC, it was the first time the network devoted any air time to Fast and Furious, a fact made obvious by the amount of catch-up reporting done by correspondent Jake Tapper. In his report, a clip played of Tapper interviewing President Obama on October 8, 2011 and describing the botched gun running as a "big scandal." Despite such an assertion, that question and Obama's response had never been aired on the network before Wednesday night.

interesting?
13 hours ago ( 2:35 PM)
That's probably because they're smart enough to know ti is a fake scandal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who Honest
13 hours ago ( 2:56 PM)
Then why does ABC News own WH man Tapper says its a "Big Scandal"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who Honest
19 hours ago ( 9:16 AM)
Despite Williams's dismissive introduction on Wednesday, the report that followed by correspondent Kelly O'Donnell was fairly straightforward, explaining: "House Republicans say they have been waiting for eight months to get documents from the Attorney General and only today the White House stepped in. A key committee took an important step toward sending a message to the Department of Justice."

Williams, I bet will have talk with Kelly about "media bias"!