Advertisement

Lead poisoning stymies condor recovery
Iconic species may not stand on its own without complete shift to nontoxic ammunition
Web edition : Tuesday, June 26th, 2012
Text Size
access
UNSAFE SCAVENGINGThe California condor, a species that survived near-extinction, isn’t establishing self-sustaining populations in the wild because of lead ammunition in carcasses the birds scavenge, researchers say.Courtesy of Daniel George

The California condor’s return to flying free in the wild after a close brush with extinction may be an illusory recovery.

The hundred-plus condors soaring over California swallow so much lead shot as they scavenge carcasses that the population can’t sustain itself without steady medical care and continual resupply from captive populations, says toxicologist Myra Finkelstein of the University of California, Santa Cruz. She and colleagues describe analyses of lead in blood and feathers June 25 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

About 30 percent of blood samples collected annually from free-flying condors in California show lead concentrations high enough to affect the birds’ physiology, Finkelstein and her colleagues report. Each year about 20 percent of the state’s monitored birds flunk their lead test badly enough to need detox.

This grim paper supplies the data to confirm the toll of lead ammunition on condors in the wild, which conservation biologists have warned about for years, says Jeff Walters of Virginia Tech in Blacksburg. Regional or species-specific regulations do restrict ammunition in California and Arizona, the two states where condors live. But those rules don’t seem to be solving the problem, Walters says.

Without a politically difficult nationwide ban on lead ammunition, he says, California condors “exist in the wild only due to costly, extensive human intervention, essentially in an outdoor-zoo state.”

The world population of free-flying California condors had dropped to 22 birds in 1982 when biologists stepped in with an ambitious plan to save them. Even though no one had bred this condor species in captivity, biologists eventually trapped all the remaining wild birds to try breeding them. The effort succeeded well enough for biologists to start releasing condors back into the wild, albeit with plenty of monitoring and help. The same threats that eroded the species to begin with are still a menace, however.

Making a wild landscape safe for condors requires strict reductions in lead exposure, Finkelstein warns. Even if only 0.5 percent of carcasses carry lead tidbits, a condor still has an 85 percent to 98 percent chance per decade of flapping down to eat one. That kind of risk matters for birds that, if healthy, live 60 to 70 years.

“I certainly would not want to see us let go of the condor — it's an iconic species of tremendous cultural value — but it's hard to justify a continued release effort until the lead issue is addressed,” says conservation biologist David Wilcove of Princeton University. “It might well be better to call off the releases until regulators develop the backbone to do something about lead.”

Walters predicts that a lead ban will eventually happen. “There is no doubt in my mind that use of lead ammunition is resulting in exposure of human children to harmful effects of lead,” he says. “We just haven’t documented the extent of this or its impact yet.  Eventually this will go the way of lead toys.” The condors may not be unusual in their reliance on people for apparent comebacks, says Mike Scott of the University of Idaho, who has written about what he calls “conservation-reliant species.” In 2010, he and his colleagues estimated that 84 percent of species listed for federal protection will need ongoing support to persist in the wild.


Found in: Environment, Life and Science & Society

Comments 2

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Condors feed on carrion of large animals. Hunters shoot large animals and take them home. Occasionally they may only wound one and it may die later. Large game animals are shot with high velocity projectiles, which most times pass through the animal and into the ground. The odds of a large game animal being wounded, escaping to die later, being hit by more than one projectile, and those projectiles staying in the carrion to be eaten , are extremely slim. The lead used in bullets is a mix of reclaimed and new, holding no particular identifying characteristics, and has been banned for over five years in the condor habitat. These people need to look at other sources for the lead they found, because this sounds much more like an anti-gun agenda than science.
    Daniel Suggs Daniel Suggs
    Jul. 2, 2012 at 9:30am
  • Indeed, I concur with Daniel Suggs and I couldn't have expressed it any better. This is a politically-motivated, anti-gun report and if the researchers are truly interested in protecting the condor, they need to look for other sources of lead in the environment-- perhaps herbicides, pesticides, or other farm runoff? But, I can almost guarantee that it is not coming from bullets for the reasons Suggs mentions.
    Bobbie Piety Bobbie Piety
    Jul. 4, 2012 at 9:10am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Advertisement
Suggested Reading :
seperator
  • Condor page from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service: [Go to]
  • J.R. Walters et al. California Condor Recovery Program Review: Status of the California Condor and efforts to achieve its recovery. Sponsored by the American Ornithologists’ Union. Presented at the American Ornithologists’ Union, August 4 -8, 2008, Portland, Oregon. [Go to]
  • J. Michael Scott et al. Conservation-reliant species and the future of conservation. Conservation Letters. Vol. 3, April 2010, p. 91. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00096.x [Go to]
  • S. Perkins.. . . and the big bird that didn't. Science News. Vol. 166, November 20, 2004, p. 334. [Go to]
  • Anon. Last wild condor caught. Science News. Vol. 131, April 25, 1987, p. 263. [Go to]
Citations & References :
seperator
  • M.E. Finkelstein et al. Lead poisoning and the deceptive recovery of the critically endangered California condor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published online June 25, 2012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203141109. [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator