James Mackintosh

If you only know one thing about European summits, it should be this: agreements aren’t worth the paper they’re written on. The fact something has been publicly announced, even written down in 4am post-summit communiques, means nothing.

Yet another European summit has been discussing yet another urgent issue, and yet again it is one that was supposed to have been agreed at a previous summit: banking union. The wrangling this time extends as far as the question of whether what was previously agreed is even legal.

Once again the deal was struck in the early hours of the morning, and once again Europe’s leaders hailed it a success. Continue reading »

James Mackintosh

Lee Buchheit is a man worth listening to. The Cleary Gottlieb lawyer wiped €100bn off Greece’s debts when he restructured the country’s bonds at the expense of the private sector, in just the latest in a long line of sovereign defaults he has overseen.

Now he’s airing his thoughts on the options for Spain and Italy, jointly with Mitu Gulati of Duke Law School – and rather bravely, he’s due to speak about it in Portugal next week.

His key message is that Spain is running on borrowed time, and should get on with a Uruguay-style debt reprofiling as soon as possible, extending maturity dates on bonds far into the future but continuing to pay interest. Continue reading »

James Mackintosh

Even after the extraordinary summer rally in European equities, strategists continue to punt European shares as cheap, and so worth buying. Unfortunately, it’s more complicated than that.

The sell-side analysts pushing the idea are too numerous to list, but one of the better argued cases is that presented by the cyclically-adjusted price-earnings ratio (CAPE), which averages profits over 10 years in an attempt to eliminate the effects of the economic cycle.

Paul Jackson at Societe Generale has some nice charts showing Europe looks cheap, and demonstrating the use of one derivative of CAPE, the cyclically-adjusted dividend yield.

CAPE vs its average

Continue reading »

John Authers

How is the US election affecting markets? Well, it seems that investors expect re-election for President Barack Obama, and their degree of confidence about this has increased remarkably in the last week. Mitt Romney’s bad stretch, as far as the markets are concerned, seems to have finished him off. That is the subject of today’s Note video, with Gideon Rachman.

The odds from the Intrade prediction market are clear enough. As for the effect of a likely Obama victory, until the last week there has been no sign at all that stock markets find it worrying. In general, his chances of winning have risen roughly in line with the stock market for most of this year; an impressive rally has not been impeded by his chance of re-election.

However, the mini-correction since the Federal Reserve announced QE3 does overlap neatly with the sudden perception that an Obama re-election was in the bag. With many only now beginning to focus on the election, it is possible that Mr Obama is indeed beginning to scare the markets.

As far as the markets are concerned, however, the looming “fiscal cliff” – automatic tax rises and spending cuts due to take effect in January – is by far the most important issue. For this, the direction of Congress is important. And here there has been an even bigger change in perceptions.

A month ago, the Democrats were seen as having little hope of holding the Senate. Now, Intrade suggests they are almost certain to do so (the contract moved sharply even since the chart above was drawn up). A strengthening of the polls behind Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts, and Republican Senate candidate Todd Akin’s horrible comments about “legitimate rape” in Missouri are deemed to have decisively improved the odds in the Democrats’ favour. Meanwhile, Intrade now suggests that it is conceivable, although still very unlikely, for the Republicans to lose their majority in the House.

All of this suggests remarkable success for an incumbent party burdened by an unemployment rate of more than 8 per cent (and slow GDP growth that was downgraded further today). There are two main implications.

First, the “fiscal cliff” negotiations may well take place in an atmosphere of recrimination, with all the congressional powerbrokers who have failed to strike compromises for the last two years still with exactly the same amount of negotiating clout as they had before. If Intrade’s betters are right, this election will do nothing to break the log jam.

And second, conventional market wisdom may well be a long way ahead of itself.

James Mackintosh

Those of a bearish inclination have been having a hard time this summer in the west, but China is a whole ‘nother thing. The Shanghai Composite is at another three and a half year low, and has been falling, on and off, since its post-crisis peak in August 2009.

Another way of looking at China is to say it is suffering from the effects of an outrageous policy-induced bubble, which was partially reinflated by the government during the crisis.

This chart shows the Shanghai index against the Nasdaq during the dotcom bubble, both rebased. In green is the S&P 500. The wild swings in China and pure-play dotcoms make the booms and busts of the S&P look tame – but still left those investors able to get their money into Chinese onshore shares (protected by capital controls) better off, at least for the moment.

China v US bubbles

Continue reading »

James Mackintosh

It took just two months of Standard & Poor’s control of Dow Jones Indexes (CME sold it in return for a stake in the new and larger S&P DJ Indices group) for S&P to start thinking about how to reform the venerable Dow Jones Industrial Average, the second-oldest index still going.

It desperately needs reform: three of the US’s 10 largest companies are excluded, and it is calculated by averaging share prices, a daft approach better suited to the days of slide rules. This video explains – charts after the break show how the Dow has performed, and discuss how investors should respond:

Continue reading »

James Mackintosh

Investors in luxury goods producers tend to spend a lot of time following what’s going on in China, for good reason. China’s legions of corrupt officials have a penchant for bling (as well as luxury cars and gambling), and plenty of ability to garner the cash needed for fancy western watches and handbags. Lately they’ve been cutting back, as the slowing economy and rising scrutiny from bloggers and the public makes open diplays of wealth less acceptable.

It might be easier simply to focus on what is going on in the US. Are households finding their share portfolios rising faster than their house prices? Shares are easier to cash in to fund that oh-so-desirable Cartier watch, although most people would have to sell their house to afford a £1.2m handbag.

Shares also tend to be watched more closely: it is much easier to check the value of one’s portfolio than the value of one’s house, so rising equity wealth ought quickly to make people feel richer, and so willing to spend more on pointless luxury. Rising house prices will not translate so quickly into more spending, particularly since the financial crisis made it harder to draw down home equity in the form of larger mortgages.

It turns out that when household share portfolios are rising faster than the value of their homes, luxury goods outperform, and when shares rise more slowly, they underperform. Dhaval Joshi at BCA Research points out the link, and it turns out to be a good explanation for how fast luxury goods shares move, too.

This chart shows US luxury goods shares in red, as measured by the Dow Jones Luxury index. Blue is the ratio of US household equity wealth to housing wealth, and for comparison in green is the US equity wealth alone. All are rebased, and it is clear that the equity to housing ratio is a better predictor of luxury goods than equity wealth alone (the green line), which is pretty much just a proxy for the wider market.

Luxury goods v equity/housing wealth

This might be a classic case of a correlation without causation. Both the equity/housing ratio and spending on luxury goods might have a common cause: signs of an improving economy, for example, should be reflected in both.

More importantly, even if there is a causal relationship here, it offers after-the-fact justification, because the Fed’s flow of funds data only provides figures for household wealth months after the fact. This is interesting, but investors need to come up with their own forecasts of whether equity wealth will rise faster than housing wealth in order to use this as a guide to luxury goods – and this is no easier than predicting the economy.

John Authers

The S&P 500 has almost completed its round trip, and done so remarkably quickly. It only has about 5 per cent to go before it reaches its all-time high from 2007. Today’s video guest, the ever-interesting David Ranson, suggests that this was predictable, because asset markets reliably follow an exponential recovery path after a big fall.

Certainly, that pattern fits this recovery remarkably well:

According to the Ranson theory, this exponential pattern gives stocks an upper bound. They find it difficult to pierce it, but in response to bad news they can fall away from it. That is what appears to have happened to emerging markets after investors started to get nervous about China last summer:

So the implications of this approach for now are that there is upside in China and the emerging markets (if you are confident that there is no more bad news to come there), while there is no upside to be had in US stocks. And that seems believable.

It is best to let David Ranson explain it for himself, which he does in the video:

 

James Mackintosh

The currency wars are under way again and Brazilian Finance Minister Guido Mantega, who coined the term, is miffed.

Mr Mantega is worried that QE3 will do what QE2 did and lead to an “avalanche” of dollars hitting emerging markets, driving up prices and currencies, helping US exports and creating troubling inflation. If it prompts the Brazilian Real to strengthen, he warned of action – although he did not say what the Brazilians might do this time:

This is going to force the Brazilian government to adopt additional measures to prevent the Real being overvalued.

Brazil imposed a series of taxes and restrictions on foreign inflows over the past three years in an effort to stop speculative cash pushing up the currency, but relaxed many of them after the renewed eurozone crisis led the Real to plunge.

Still, it isn’t obvious that Brazil is losing the currency war, as these charts show: Continue reading »

John Authers

As predicted, there is more to say about the London housing market. It is widely known that the buying pressure on prime London properties is coming from overseas. The eurozone crisis and the creation of fortunes by the commodities boom have helped push lots of money into the nicer neighbourhoods of central and west London.

But I had not previously grasped that foreign demand was also driving segments of the market below the true “prime” postcodes, and that that foreign demand is not primarily European or Middle Eastern but rather from Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. That is the strong message from this extraordinary chart from Jones Lang LaSalle, shared by Ed Hammond, our property correspondent, in the latest Note video:

 

To be clear about what the chart shows, it covers all new developments, including two-bedroom flats or purpose-built estates, and not just new prime developments. Developers currently find that they can sell such developments “off plan” to buyers in south-east Asia who do not even need to take a look at the property first. The implications are that there is sufficient external demand to soak up a lot of extra supply, should it come on tap, and that the London property market is vulnerable to events in Asia, as well as in the Middle East and Europe. One caveat to this data is that Jones Lang LaSalle tends to concentrate on the foreign market. But even so, another vital question has to be whether it can possibly be sustainable that only 19 per cent of purchasers of newly built central London residences are British. Ed Hammond will be publishing more analysis of this shortly. The video appears here:

FT Long Short

Investing and markets

About this blog Blog guide
Welcome, if you have yet to register on FT.com, you will now be asked to do so before you begin to read FT blogs, however our posts remain free.

This blog is about asset allocation at the global level. It is an ongoing attempt to explain why investors and markets behave the way they do.

John Authers officially takes the "Long View", while James Mackintosh takes the "Short View" when it comes to investment decisions. In practice both of us end up taking both long- and short-term views, and occasionally disagreeing with each other; all comments and disagreements are very welcome.
To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

See the full list of FT blogs.

About James

James Mackintosh is the Financial Times' Investment Editor, writing and presenting the daily Short View column and video. In 16 years at the FT his posts have included comment editor, motor industry editor and hedge funds correspondent, as well as spells in the Parliamentary lobby and Paris. He was the first reporter hired for FT.com, joining two weeks before it launched.

James has a degree in philosophy and psychology from the University of Oxford, where he spent two further years in post-graduate study of philosophy. If he wasn't here, he'd be skiing.


About John

John Authers is the Financial Times' Senior Investment Columnist, writing the Saturday Long View and a regular Monday column. In a 22-year career at the FT, his previous posts have included global head of the Lex column, investment editor, US markets editor, Mexico City bureau chief and US banking correspondent. His latest book is The Fearful Rise of Markets.

John has a degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics from the University of Oxford, and an MBA from Columbia University. Perhaps more interestingly, he captained the highest scoring team in the history of University Challenge while at Oxford, and also once sung in Pavarotti's backing choir.

Follow John Authers on the A-List.


Latest tweets from John and James

jmackin2jmackin2: In the Wars, a Star #NYTmovies
3 hours ago
jmackin2jmackin2: Perfect xmas gift for the man who has everything: $8m to name a city in Japan. Romneyville? http://t.co/XcMA0DNF
4 hours ago
jmackin2jmackin2: RT @BCAppelbaum: One has the sense that @TheEconomist is perpetually disappointed with our management of its former colonies.
4 hours ago
jmackin2jmackin2: Femtocells are available in the US, points out @michaelsteen. So why is there still patchy mobile access in Manhattan skyscrapers? Buy buy!
9 hours ago
jmackin2jmackin2: If these internet-linked mini cell towers were available in the US, every Manhattan business might buy lots http://t.co/Ne3OiuId
9 hours ago

Videos


Most commented posts

    Categories

    Commodities Global economy The Long View Italy Capital markets Banking Federal Reserve Bonds Gold China Real estate Currencies Property Eurozone Equity markets The Short View Authers' notes Uncategorized

    Tags

    acronym Authers bail-in bail-out bank losses Bank of Japan Banks Ben Bernanke bonds bunds central banks charts Citigroup Crisis currency wars dot com downgrade Draghi ECB ego Euro eurozone Fed Federal Reserve Forward PE Germany gold Greece Helicopter Ben housing hunt for yield Ireland Italy Jackson Hole luxury periphery property QE QE3 quantitative easing ratings real estate S&P 500 Spain Treasuries

    Archive

    « OctNovember 2012
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930