Douglas Beloof, Paul G. Cassell & Steven J. Twist, Victims in Criminal Procedure (Carolina Academic Press 3rd ed. 2010).

Paul G. Cassell, DEBATING THE DEATH PENALTY: THE EXPERTS FROM BOTH SIDES MAKE THEIR CASE, (Hugo Bedau & Paul G. Cassell eds.,Oxford University Press 2004). Douglas Beloof, Paul G. Cassell & Steven J. Twist, Victims in Criminal Procedure (Carolina Academic Press 3rd ed. 2010).

Paul G. Cassell & Nathaniel James Mitchell, Protecting Crime Victims' Rights Before Charges Are Filed: The Need for Expansive Interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Similar State Statutes (work in progress).

Paul G. Cassell, The Victims' Rights Amendment: A Sympathetic, Clause-By-Clause Analysis of the Proposal, 5 Phoenix L. Rev. 301 (2012) (lead symposium article).

Paul G. Cassell, Freeing the Guilty Without Protecting the Innocent: Some Skeptical Observations on Proposed New ‘Innocence' Procedures, 56 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 1063 (2012).

Paul G. Cassell & Tomas Goodwin, Protecting Taxpayers and Crime Victims: The Case for Restricting Utah's Preliminary Hearings to Felony Offenses, Utah L. Rev. v. 2011 no. 4 (2011)

Paul G. Cassell & Edna Erez, Victim Impact Statements and Ancillary Harm: The American Perspective, 15 Canadian Crim. L. Rev. 149 (2011).

Paul G. Cassell & Erik Luna, Sense and Sensibility in Mandatory Minimum Sentencing, 23 Fed. Sent'g Rep. 219 (2011).

Paul G. Cassell & Steven Joffee, The Crime Victims' Expanding Role in a System of Public Prosecution: A Response to the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 105 Nw. U. L. Rev.: Colloquy 164 (2011).

Paul G. Cassell & Erik Luna, Mandatory Minimalism, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 1 (2010).

Paul G. Cassell, Judicial Discretion: A Look Forward and a Look Back Five Years After ‘Booker,' 22 Fed. Sent'g Rep. 297 (June 2010) (symposium organizer & participant).

Paul G. Cassell, Protecting Crime Victims in Federal Appellate Courts: The Need to Broadly Construe the Crime Victims' Rights Act's Mandamus Provision, 87 Denv. U. L. Rev. 599 (2010).

Paul G. Cassell, In Defense of Victim Impact Statements, 6 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 611 (2009).

Paul G. Cassell & Joshua K. Marquis, What's Wrong with Democracy? A Critique of ‘The Supreme Court and the Politics of Death,' 94 Va. L. Rev. 65 (2008).

Paul G. Cassell, In Defense of the Death Penalty, 2 J. of the Inst. for the Advancement of Crim. Just. 15 (Summer 2008), reprinted in 42 The Prosecutor 10 (October 2008).

Paul G. Cassell, Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861 (2007).

Paul G. Cassell, Crime Shouldn't Pay: A Proposal to Create an Effective and Constitutional Federal Anti-Profiting Statute, 19 Fed. Sent'g Rep. 119 (2006).

Paul G. Cassell, Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 2005 BYU L. Rev. 835 (2005).

Douglas Beloof & Paul G. Cassell, The Victim's Right to Attend the Trial: The Reascendant National Consensus, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 481 (2005).

Paul G. Cassell, Too Severe? A Defense of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (And a Critique of the Federal Mandatory Minimums), 56 Stan. L. Rev. 1017 (2004).

Paul G. Cassell, The Paths Not Taken: A Critique of the Supreme Court's Decision in ‘Dickerson,' 99 Mich. L. Rev. 898 (2001).

Paul G. Cassell, The Statute that Time Forgot: 18 U.S.C. § 3501 and the Overhauling of ‘Miranda,' 85 Iowa L. Rev. 175 (1999).

Paul G. Cassell, Barbarians at the Gates: A Reply to the Critics of the Victims' Rights Amendment, 1999 Utah L. Rev. 479 (1999).

Paul G. Cassell, The Guilty and the ‘Innocent': An Examination of Alleged Cases of Wrongful Conviction from False Confessions, 22 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 523 (1999).

Paul G. Cassell & Richard Fowles, Handcuffing the Cops? A Thirty Year Perspective on ‘Miranda's' Effects on Law Enforcement, 50 Stan. L. Rev. 1055 (1998).

Paul G. Cassell & Richard Fowles, Declining Clearance Rates After ‘Miranda': Coincidence or Consequence?, 50 Stan. L. Rev. 1181 (1998).

Paul G. Cassell, Protecting the Innocent from False Confessions and Lost Confessions-And from ‘Miranda,' 88 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 497 (1998).

Paul G. Cassell & Evan Strassberg, Evidence of Repeated Acts of Child Molestation and Rape: The Need to Reform Utah Law to Insure Admissibility, 1998 Utah L. Rev. 145 (1998).

Paul G. Cassell, Balanced Approaches to the False Confession Problem: A Brief Comment on Ofshe, Leo, and Alschuler, 74 Denver U. L. Rev. 1123 (1997).

Paul G. Cassell, 'Miranda's' Negligible Effect on law Enforcement: Some Skeptical Observations, 20 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 327 (1997).

Paul G. Cassell, The Cost of the ‘Miranda' Mandate: A Lesson in the Dangers of Inflexible, ‘Prophylactic' Supreme Court Inventions, 28 Ariz. St. L.J. 299 (1996).

Paul G. Cassell & Bret Hayman, Police Interrogation in the 1990s: An Empirical Study of the Effects of 'Miranda,' 42 UCLA L. Rev. 839 (1996).

Paul G. Cassell, All Benefits, No Costs: The Grand Illusion of ‘Miranda's' Defenders, 90 Nw U. L. Rev. 1084 (1996).

Paul G. Cassell, ‘Miranda's' Social Costs: An Empirical Reassessment, 90 Nw U. L. Rev. 387 (1996).

Paul G. Cassell, Search and Seizure Law in Utah: The Irrelevance of the Antipolygamy Raids, 1995 BYU L. Rev. 1 (1995).

Paul G. Cassell, Balancing the Scales of Justice: The Case for the Effects of Utah's Victims' Rights Amendment, 1994 Utah L. Rev. 1373 (1994).

Paul G. Cassell, The Rodney King Trials and the Double Jeopardy Clause: Some Observations on Original Meaning and the ACLU's Schizophrenic Views of the Dual Sovereign Doctrine, 41 UCLA L. Rev. 693 (1994).

Paul G. Cassell, The Mysterious Creation of Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rules Under State Constitutions: The Utah Example, 1993 Utah L. Rev. 753 (1993).

Paul G. Cassell, The Supreme Court's Decisions on the Not-so-Peremptory Challenge, Pub. Int. L. Rev. 11 (1992).

Paul G. Cassell & Stephen J. Markman, Protecting the Innocent: A Response to the Bedan-Radelet Study, 41 Stan. L. Rev. 121 (1988).

Paul G. Cassell, Restrictions on Press Coverage of Military Operations: The Right of Access, Grenada, and ‘Off the Record' Wars, 73 Geo. L. J. 931 (1985).

Paul G. Cassell, Exemption of International Shipping Conferences from the American Antitrust Laws: An Economic Analysis, 20 New Eng. L. Rev. 1 (1984).

Paul G. Cassel, Note, Establishing Violations of International Law: Yellow Rain and the Chemical and Biological Warfare Agreements, 35 Stan. L. Rev. 259 (1983).

A Tribute to Joe Grano: He Kept the Flame Alive, 46 Wayne L. Rev. 1215 (2000) (reviewing Joseph D. Grano, Confessions, Truth, and the Law (1993))

United States v. Planells-Guerra, 509 F. Supp. 2d 1000 (D. Utah 2007) (finding that good faith exception to the exclusionary rule extends to warrantless searches).

United States v. Wilson, 350 F. Supp. 2d 910 (D. Utah 2005) (Sentencing Guidelines should be given heavy weight after Booker; first opinion in the nation interpreting Booker).

United States v. Angelos, 345 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (D. Utah 2004) (finding mandatory 55-year sentence just, cruel and irrational but nonetheless constitutional).

Benson v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners, 337 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (D. Utah 2004) (rejecting NLRB's efforts to enjoin union's display of banners).

Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of Roy, 333 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (D. Utah 2004) (rejecting constitutional challenges to sexually oriented business ordinances).

United States v. Croxford, 324 F. Supp. 2d 1230 (D. Utah 2004) (first opinion in the country finding federal sentencing guidelines unconstitutional).

Parker v. Olympus Health Care, Inc., 264 F. Supp. 2d 998 (D. Utah 2003) (affirming jury verdict of $2.5 million in sexual harassment case).

The Victim's Rights Amendment:  Testimony before the Constitution Subcomm. of the House Judiciary Committee (Apr. 26, 2012) (Washington, D.C.).

Protecting Crime Victims' Rights in the Federal Sentencing Process:  Testimony before the U.S. Sentencing Commission (Oct. 20, 2009) (Denver, Colo.).

Improving Restitution in Federal Criminal Cases:  Testimony before the Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security Subcomm.  of the H. Judiciary Comm. (Apr. 3, 2008) (Washington, D.C.).

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Practices:  Testimony before the Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security Subcomm.  of the H. Judiciary Comm. (June 26, 2007) (Washington, D.C.).

Federal Sentencing Practices:  Testimony before the Crime Subcomm. of the H. Judiciary Comm., Mar. 16, 2006 (Washington, D.C.) (Washington, D.C.).

Victims' Rights under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines:  Testimony before the U.S. Sentencing Comm. (Mar. 15, 2006) (Washington, D.C.).

Booker's Impact on Federal Sentencing:  Testimony before the U.S. Sentencing Comm. (Feb. 15, 2005) (Washington, D.C.).

The Effects of Blakely v. Washington on the Federal Judicial System:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (July 12, 2004) (Washington, D.C.).

The Severity of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines:  Testimony before the ABA Kennedy Comm. (Nov. 13, 2003) (Washington, D.C.).

The Justice Department's Failure to Enforce 18 U.S.C. § 3501:  Testimony before the Subcomm. on Criminal Justice Oversight of the S. Judiciary Comm. (May 13, 1999) (Washington, D.C.).

The Right of Crime Victims to be Heard Throughout the Criminal Justice Process:  Testimony before the Subcomm. on the Constitution of the S. Judiciary Comm. (May 1, 1999) (St. Louis, Mo.).

A Response to the Critics of the Victims' Rights Amendment:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Mar. 24, 1999) (Washington, D.C.).

The Victims' Rights Amendment:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Apr. 28, 1998) (Washington, D.C.).

A Constitutional Amendment Protecting the Rights of Crime Victims:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm.  (Apr. 16, 1997) (Washington, D.C.).

Admission of Sexual Assault Counselors during Trials:  Testimony before the H. Judiciary Comm. (Utah Feb. 7 & 9, 1996).

The Victims' Bill of Rights Amendment:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Apr. 23, 1996) (Washington, D.C.).

Amending the Idaho Constitution to Provide for Consistent Interpretation of Search and Seizure Rules:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Idaho Feb. 1, 1995) (Boise, Idaho).

The Performance of the Solicitor General's Office in Criminal Cases:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Nov. 14, 1995) (Washington, D.C.).

Reforming the Miranda Rules in Federal Courts:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Mar. 7, 1995) (Washington, D.C.).

Amending the Idaho Constitution to Provide for the Rights of Crime Victims:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Mar. 2, 1994) (Boise, Idaho).

Amending the Idaho Constitution to Provide for the Rights of Crime Victims:  Testimony before the H. Judiciary Comm. (Idaho Feb. 12, 1994) (Boise, Idaho).

A Constitutional Declaration of the Rights of Crime Victims:  Testimony before the H. State and Local Affairs Comm. (Utah Feb. 24, 1994).

Requiring the Admission of Evidence Obtained in Lawful Searches:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Utah Jan. 24, 1994); before the H. Judiciary Comm. (Utah Feb. 2, 1994).

The Role of the Death Penalty in Protecting the Innocent:  Testimony before the Subcomm. on Crime of the H. Judiciary Comm. (Oct. 21, 1993) (Washington, D.C.).

Claims of Innocence in Capital Cases:  Testimony before the Subcomm. on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the H. Judiciary Comm. (July 23, 1993) (Washington, D.C.).

Procedures for Raising Claims of Innocence in Capital Cases:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Apr. 1, 1993) (Washington, D.C.).

Requiring the Admission of Relevant Evidence in Criminal Proceedings:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Utah Feb. 11, 1993); before the S. (Utah Feb. 17, 1993) (Comm. of the Whole); before the H. Judiciary Comm. (Utah Feb. 25, 1993).

The Possibility of Mistake in Capital Cases:  Testimony before the S. Judiciary Comm. (Sept. 28, 1989) (Washington, D.C.).

Habeas Corpus and Capital Punishment Legislation:  Testimony before the Subcomm. on Government Information, Justice and Agriculture of the H. Government Operations Comm. (Feb. 26, 1999) (Tallahassee, Fla.).

Crime's, Courts and Cures:  Reviewing The Collapse of American Criminal Justice, Wall St. J., Oct. 26, 2011, at A13.

We're not Executing the Innocent, Wall St. J., June 16, 2000, at A14.

Take Technicality out of Miranda, L.A. Times, Dec. 6, 1999, at B7.

Make Amends to Crime Victims, Wall St. J., July 20, 1999, at A22.

Sentence Structure, Wall St. J., Oct. 20, 1998, at A16 (reviewing Fear of Justice).

Embed the Rights of Victims in the Constitution, L.A. Times, July 6, 1998, at B7 (co-author with Laurence H. Tribe).

Paying the Highest Price, Wash. Post Book World, Feb. 8, 1998, at A5 (reviewing anti-death penalty books).

Another Law Janet Reno Doesn't Like, Wall St. J., Aug. 27, 1997, at A13 (co-author with Paul Kamenar).

The Tale of Victims' Rights, Legal Times, Dec. 23, 1996, at 32 (co-author with Robert F. Hoyt). True Confessions About Miranda's Legacy, Legal Times, July 22, 1996, at 20.

A Bill of Rights for Crime Victims, Wall St. J., Apr. 24, 1996, at A15 (co-author with Steven Twist).

True Confessions:  Miranda's Hidden Costs, Nat'l Rev., Dec. 25, 1995, at 30 (co-author with Steve Markman).

What's Ken Starr Looking For?, Wall St. J., Nov. 1, 1995, at A15.

How Many Criminals Has Miranda Set Free?, Wall St. J., Mar. 1, 1995, at A17.

Expert Testimony on False Confessions in State v.Maughan, No. 051100355 (Dist. Ct., Utah 2009) (provided expert report).

Expert Testimony on False Confessions in Gonzalez v. County of Los Angeles, No. CV 07-2064 (C.D. Cal. 2009) (provided expert report and deposition testimony).

Expert Testimony on False Confessions in Marlatt et al. v.Perez et al., No. CS-00-0221-AAM (E.D. Wash. 2001) (provided expert report and videotaped testimony).

Expert Testimony on False Confessions on behalf of the United States in United States v.Wildcat, No. CR-99-3-E-BLW (D. Idaho 1999) (provided report and testimony at preliminary hearing).

Expert Testimony on the Utah State Constitution and Death qualification of Juries in Capital Cases in State v. Decorso, No. 95-1900991 (Dist. Ct. Utah 1996) (provided expert report).

Expert Testimony on False Confessions in People v. Thomas, No. 08-1074 (Super. Ct. County of Rensselaer, NY) (admissibility hearing; testimony of defendant's expert Richard Ofshe excluded based, in part, on my testimony).

Frequent consultant to Attorney's General's Offices, prosecutors, crime victims, and defense attorneys about criminal justice issues, including crime victims' rights, police questioning and false confessions, and death penalty procedures.

Defining ‘Victims' of Environmental Crimes, Greenbag Presentation to the Wallace Stegner Center, S.J. Quinney College of Law, Nov. 2012

Advocating for Crime Victims, Training for Attorneys and Victim Advocates, Aug. 2012

Who is a Victim for Victim’s Rights Enforcement, Presentation to NCVLI’s 11th Annual Crime Victim Law Conference, Portland, OR, June 2012

Advancing Crime Victims’ Rights Through Litigation, Webinar Presentation for NCVLI, Aug. 2011

Strategic Litigation of Crime Victims’ Rights: “Test Cases,” Presentation to NCVLI’s 10th Annual Crime Victim Law Conference, Portland, OR, June 2011

The Utah Exclusionary Rule: No Foundation in the Utah Constitution?, Debate Before the Criminal Law Section of the Utah Bar, Salt Lake City, UT, Feb. 2011

A Public Safety Exception to Miranda for Questioning Terrorism Suspects?, Debate Against Professor Guoira (podcast by the Federalist Society, followup debate on March 31, 2011), Salt Lake City, UT, Feb. 2011

Some Skeptical Observations About Innocence Procedures, Presentation to the Univ. of Utah College of Law Faculty, Salt Lake City, UT, Jan. 2011

Innocence Procedures: Some Questions, Concerns, and Alternative Proposals, Symposium Presentation at New York Law School, New York, NY, Nov. 2010

Arguing and Securing Restitution, Presentation to the 36th Annual National Conference of the National Organization for Victim Assistance, Aug. 2010

New Developments in Restitution Law and 'Victims’ Rights in Plea Bargains, Presentations to the Annual National Conference of the National Crime Victim Law Institute, Portland, OR, June 2010

Expert Witness in the Mock Trial of The Queen v. The United States Death Penalty, Program Sponsored by Amicus in the Emmanuel Centre, London, UK, Mar. 2010

The U.S. Supreme Court at Mid-Term, Conference at Stanford Law School, Palo Alto, CA, Feb.2010

Strategic Crime Victims Litigation, Presentation to the 8th Annual National Conference of the National Crime Victim’s Law Institution, Portland, OR, July 2009

A Look Back at the Year in Federal Victim's Rights Law, Keynote Address to the 8th Annual National Conference of the National Crime Victim's Law Institute, June 30, 2009 (Portland, OR)

Crime Victims’ Rights: Emerging Issues in Federal and Oregon Courts, CLE Program for the National Crime Victim’s Law Institute, Portland, OR, April 2009

Enforcing Crime Victims' Rights, Presentation to the Utah Council on Victims of Crime, Annual Crime Victims Conference, Apr. 29, 2009 (Salt Lake City, UT)

The Crime Victims' Rights Movement: A Look Backward, A Look Forward, Keynote Address for the 2009 National Crime Victims' Rights Week Commemoration Ceremony Sponsored by the Oregon Department of Justice, Apr. 28, 2009 (Portland, OR)

Important Principles of Crime Victims' Rights Law, Training Session for Victims' Rights Advocates Sponsored by the U.S. Dept. of Justice Office for Victims of Crime, Oct. 30, 2008 (Charleston, SC)

A Proposed Amendment Allowing Videotaping as a Substitute for Miranda Procedures, Presentation to the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure Advisory Comm., Oct. 27, 2008 (Salt Lake City, UT)

The Legal Legacy of the Bush Administration, Presentation to the College of William and Mary School of Law, Institute of Bill of Rights Law Annual Preview, Sept. 27, 2008 (Williamsburg, VA)

The Crime Victims' Rights Amendment, Presentation to the Federal Judicial Conference's Annual Sentencing Institute, June 25, 2008 (Long Beach, CA)

Crime Victims' Rights: The View from Behind the Bench and In Front of the Bench, Keynote Address to the 7th Annual National Conference of the National Crime Victim Law Institute, May 31, 2008 (Portland, OR)

Emerging Issues in Crime Victims' Law,  Remarks to the National District Attorney's Training Conference, Apr. 21, 2008 (Chicago, IL)

In Defense of Victim Impact Statements, The Nineteenth Annual Walter C. Reckless-Simon Dinitz Memorial Lecture, Ohio State University, Apr. 7, 2008 (Columbus, OH)

A New Initiative to Protect Victims' Rights in California, Presentation at Stanford Law School, Jan. 25, 2008 (Palo Alto, CA)

The Need to Amend Utah's Exclusionary Rule, Presentation to the Constitutional Revision Commission, Nov. 15, 2007 (Salt Lake City, UT)

Mandatory Minimums and the Crack/Powder Sentencing Disparity, Presentation at Stanford Law School, Sept. 6, 2007 (Palo Alto, CA)

American Sentencing Guidelines in Operation and Practice, Presentation to the State Duma Committee on Constitutional Legislation, Oct. 13, 2005 (Moscow, Russia)

The Role of International Law in American Legal Decisions, Presentation of the University of Utah International Law Society, Sept. 9, 2005 (Salt Lake City, UT)

The Effects of Booker on Federal Sentencing, Panel Discussion for the 2005 National Sentencing Policy Institute, July 11, 2005 (Washington, D.C.)

Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Speech to the Annual Training Conference of the National Crime Victims Law Institute, June 17, 2005 (Portland, OR)

Sentencing After Booker, Panel Presentation for the Sentencing Commission's Annual Conference on Sentence, May 26, 2005 (San Francisco, CA)

Separation of Powers and the American Judicial System, Presentation to the Kharkiv National Law Academy, Mar. 30, 2005 (Kharkiv, Ukraine)

The Victim's Right to Attend Trials: The Re-Emerging National Consensus, Lewis and Clark Law Review Symposium, Mar. 11, 2005 (Portland, OR)

The Sentencing Guidelines After Booker, Presentation to the ABA's Annual White Collar Crime Convention, Mar. 3, 2005 (Las Vegas, NV)

The Effects of Booker v. United States,  Presentation to the ABA National Convention, Criminal Justice Section, Feb. 11, 2005 (Salt Lake City, UT)

The Effects of Blakely V. Washington, Presentation to the Federal Judiciary Center's National Workshop for District Judges, Sept. 20, 2004 (Seattle, WA)

Blakely v Washington, Presentation to the University of New Mexico School of Law Federalist Society, Sept. 10, 2004 (Albuquerque, NM)

Downward Departures after the PROTECT Act, Presentation to the Annual National Seminar on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, May 20, 2004 (Miami, FL)

Federal Sentencing Practices, Stanford Law Review Symposium, Feb. 20, 2004 (Palo Alto, CA)

Discussion on the U.S. Supreme Court by Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer, Moderator, Tenth Circuit Judicial Conference, Sept. 5, 2003 (Jackson, WY)

The Death Penalty, 2001 Oxford-Annenberg Debate, City University of New York, June 14, 2001, (New York, NY)

Member, Utah Bar

Special Counsel, National Crime Victims Law Institute

Special Counsel, Utah Council on Victims of Crime