AP, 28 news orgs launch NewsRight to collect licensing fees from aggregators

After three full years of preparation, the Associated Press and 28 other news organizations begin today an ambitious venture to license original news content and collect royalties from aggregators.

Variously known as the News Registry and News Licensing Group during its development, the freestanding business begins offering customers content licenses with a new corporate name, NewsRight.

There is plenty that is complex about the venture, but CEO David Westin told me in a phone interview over the holidays that the three keys to success are simple.

“First, we need as broad support within the industry as possible,” he said. “That’s what makes it more efficient from the customer’s view (than negotiating license agreements individually).” With the 28 co-investors, 30 additional participating companies and more than 800 sites (nearly all U.S. newspaper-based for right now), Westin said, NewsRight begins operations with a “substantial catalogue” to offer.

Steps two and three will unwind slowly, perhaps over a period of several more years.  “We hope to alter behavior in the marketplace,” Westin said. “Will aggregators embrace it” as a package solution to getting content legally and compensating those who gather it? If so, Westin continued, the final question becomes “how much value can we generate and return to the producers?”

Should NewsRight catch on big, as it founders hope, the industry will have in place a second leg to a paid digital content strategy. Paywalls and bundled print/digital subscriptions had a snowballing adoption curve in 2011 that will continue into this year. The New York Times metered model and its variations essentially ask heavy direct users of news websites to pay some of the cost of generating content.

NewsRight aims to apply the same strategy to aggregators, targeting those who make heavy (and commercial) use of content originated elsewhere. They are being asked to become payers rather than free riders.

But success is by no means assured, Westin concedes. There are established competitors, principally the non-profit Copyright Clearance Center, that have for decades been collecting royalties from universities and corporations for reuse of material. CCC represents a wide range of publishers, including some newspapers.

Other newer companies, notably Attributor, track the use of digitally published content by aggregators. Attributor counts the AP and many other of the news organizations as clients. Its services include the option of asking unauthorized contributors to pay up.

And many newspaper organizations, Westin said, have existing licensing agreements with Google, Yahoo and other big aggregators.

NewsRight is not demanding exclusivity. So it will begin operations alongside this loosely-knit system rather than necessarily as a substitute. Also, Westin said, each organization determines which portion of its content it seeks to license rather than following any rules set by NewsRight.

So what will NewsRight have going for it?

With Associated Press stories and content from a Who’s Who of newspapers, it will represent a significant one-stop shopping opportunity for aggregators willing to pay.

When I spoke with Fred Haber, general counsel of CCC a year ago, he explained that their system depends on voluntary compliance. There are any number of institutions and businesses willing to avoid legal hassles or an appearance of unethical practice by paying when asked.

For the business to work, it needs both a mass of those customers and a mass of content producers, together with a smooth-running collection mechanism. Rights clearance then provides significant efficiency for both the customers and content providers (as opposed, for instance, to a university library seeking permission each time it wants to make 25 photocopies of a scholarly journal article).

The same principles will apply for NewsRight. Text stories from newspaper organizations (which own the AP co-operative) are the logical place to start, Westin said. But if successful, NewsRight will expand to licensing photos and video as well, and the content of broadcast, website and international clients.

The venture, while spun off from AP as an independent business in mid-2011, is housed at the wire service’s headquarters in New York City. It begins with just 11 employees, Westin said, half tech, half legal and management. The first salesperson will begin work this week.

The 11 include some high-level hires. Westin had long experience as a communications lawyer in Washington and spent a more than a decade as president of ABC News. AP has also donated general counsel Sri Kasi to the start-up.

There is a second product offering besides licensing. The anticipated volume of stories tracked and aggregation uses identified will generate a rich volume of data that can be purchased as analytics. Westin said that news outlets, marketing and public relations firms may want such data to analyze the volume of pickups, level of reader interest and shelf life of given stories.

Drawing on his editing time at ABC, Westin said that editors can be helped by identifying spikes in attention to running stories, deciding when to continue with follow-ups and when to wind down coverage. A public relations firm working with a corporation experiencing negative coverage, for another example, would have a similar interest in detailed story tracking across all the nooks and crannies of the Internet.

The analytics can break down readership by headline-only, short summary or deep exploration of an article. The data is available quickly but not instantaneously, Westin said. “Four hours seems to be the magic number.”

Years in the making

The AP has had its eye on protecting content at least since 2006. When I did a pair of stories then on changes at the wire service, Jim Kennedy, director of strategic planning, mentioned that experiments were under way to “watermark” AP stories so as to facilitate tracking of unauthorized use.

Interest reached a crescendo when the Associated Press and Newspaper Association of America met jointly in San Diego in spring 2009. There was much talk at the time of suing Google and Rupert Murdoch  was thundering against rogue aggregators “stealing our content.” AP Chairman William Dean Singleton of MediaNews, said in a convention speech, “We can no longer stand by and watch others walk off with our work under misguided legal theories.”

While lawsuits and threats of lawsuits will eventually be part of the NewsRight playbook (as they are at CCC), the final shape of the venture as it opens for business is much more diplomatic and technology-driven.

Tom Curley, AP’s CEO, has been among the strongest proponents of the licensing inititative and has made it the centerpiece of his presentations to industry groups for several years. In a panel at Poynter in fall 2010, he joked that it must be really important since it had been widely ignored by writers on media business.

AP is the single largest investor but has a minority stake. A breakdown of ownership shares, the cost of development and operations, and the fee structure for licensing and the analytics are all being kept confidential for now.

The 28 partner organizations include the New York Times Co. and Washington Post Co., McClatchy and most mid-sized newspaper chains, public and private. Poynter’s Times Publishing Company is among the investors and the chairman of the NewsRight board is Bob Nutting, CEO and President of Ogden Newspapers.  One of the hopes is that the participating organizations will have a stronger negotiating position with aggregators than they do now handling rights licensing independently.

Business Wire is on board as a non-newspaper voice and German publisher Axel Springer is as well for an international perspective.

There are a few notable names missing from the roster too — Gannett, Tribune, Cox and News Corp. When I mentioned those, Westin quickly said that negotiations are ongoing with all four to bring them aboard as participants if not investors.

In fact, he added, while the tracking technology and royalty collection is complex, the many launch delays had everything to do with company-by-company business issues.

Once past the general principle of getting compensation, Westin said, companies needed some time to pull together all that they were doing in tracking aggregation and licensing, then needed more time to figure out whether and how NewsRight participation might help generate reuse income.

The venture will likely be greeted with derision or yawns by the digital intelligentsia, who have long decided that fences around content are retro and futile with the Internet providing users so many avenues to free news access.

But we are about to have a real-world test of that proposition, where even middling success would count as a big win for the legacy companies who have long wanted to be paid more and more broadly for the news content they originate.

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Anonymous

    Who wants the content from these dinosaurs?  Journalists know absolutely nothing compared to domain experts who can now get the real news out to the world via the internet on their own.

  • http://www.facebook.com/francis.hamit Francis Hamit

    The assumption at Big Media companies has been that no one will ever have the resources to sue, so copyright registrations need not be checked, letters from those infringed and their attorneys can be safely ignored and they can do as they please, law or no law.  I proved that was false in 2006 with a case called Hamit Vs, Cygnus Business Media.  They were a former publisher that had infringed 99 of my articles delivered on a First Serial Rights (only) basis over seven years.  Not only were they served but so were ten of their aggregator clients.  17 lawyers showed up for the first hearing on the defendant’s’ side and the case was quickly settled in my favor for an amount I am not allowed to disclose, by order of the Court. All of the legal fees came back on the primary defendant since they had warranted that they had the rights they sold.  I’m not a crusader and it took four years to get it to court, so a service that will handle licensing and royalty payments is of great interest to freelance writers everywhere.  No one wants to go to court and the Federal District Courts don’t want these cases, but a few of us will push it to get paid what we are due.    Ignoring mine and my lawyer’s letters was not a correct decision. 

  • Anonymous

    To what extent will this service commit copyright fraud by licensing content that is either not copyrightable or owned by other parties?

  • Anonymous

    If a publication is blessed with an outside link from anyone, a delighted reader sharing with a friend, a scholar using its words to bolster a proposition, or a nasty, old aggregator, where’s the harm? Doesn’t the prospect of readers reading the publication’s ads help the publication to sell more ads to generate more money to pay for the content?

    Aren’t more readers the solution? Or the problem?

  • Anonymous


    Re Righthaven.  Your point is well taken.  The post was long by my standards as is.  And I guess after making the points that NewsRight and CCC’s business depends on voluntary compliance and that suits and threats of lawsuits would be a secondary part of the playbook, I figured that an informed person like you would connnect the dots.  But, yes, Righthaven’s m.o. of catching unauthorized users and filing suits seems to be the wrong way to go about this as a business.

    Also another issue for another day is how and whether NewsRight will take on aggregators who do some rewriting (but bascially expropriate the story) or whether a headline and a few summary grafs constitutes an unathorized use.  In  some of the other coverage, Westin indicated that he will begin with commercial services that scrape content and package news summaries for business clients.  As you know, the subject of fair use in the digital era is still a moving target and the subject of books like Lawrence Lessig’s and of intense debate.

    Thanks to all commenters and tweeters for extending the discussion.

  • http://newstechnica.com David Gerard

    How did you get through this entire article and interview without once mentioning the RightHaven debacle? Surely that’s just a little relevant.

  • Nikki H

    If it’s not free, I don’t need it. I have a television. I hope search engines de-list every one of these sites. Good luck getting traffic then, folks.

  • http://findajobfaster.blogspot.com/2011/06/stop-depending-on-monstercom-and.html findajobfaster

    This should’ve been implemented years ago.  What’s been the holdup?

  • http://www.facebook.com/dayvideorockbirth David DesRoches

    This is great, thanks for posting. No mention of the Fair Use Consortium? Are they involved in any way?

  • Anonymous

    Sounds very similar to NewsCred, who just recently announced their launch and funding.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PYL3PCCT2QKBV3M4WN7RETGKZU Kris

    AP wants to license content they provide to aggregators yet they are the original
    aggregators that don’t want to fool with the hassles of licensing original content from their freelance writers and photographers.  I feel like AP started this whole mess, in my generation anyway, when they started rights grabbing from their content providers.  Instead of licensing the photographs for further use, they simply say “for $300 we own everything, including the outtakes”.  I have no sympathy for them or any rights grabbing company that poop on the heads of their content providers and then complain that others are stealing their original content.  People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

  • robelroy

    Woot! Bout time!

  • robelroy

    Woot! Bout time!

  • Anonymous


    Thanks for the catch.  My mistake.


  • Anonymous

    “Bob Nutting, CEO and President of Ogden (Utah) Newspapers.” I don’t think “Utah” has anything to do with Ogden Newspapers.

  • http://twitter.com/pmharrell Paul Harrell

    The last gasps of a dying media empire.