Archives

August 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Recently in Avionics Category

AF447: When hearing isn't believing

| | Comments () | TrackBacks (0)

Two short paragraphs of the Air France AF447 investigation report offer an curious insight into the brain's response to aural alarm signals - and might go some way to explain not just the crew's failure to recognise the A330's stall but why terrain-warning systems sometimes seem to bark at pilots to 'pull up' in vain.

Stall warnings on the ill-fated Airbus sounded continuously for 54 seconds. But the inquiry report, sourcing seven different research papers, states that aural warnings demand the use of cognitive resources already engaged during periods of high workload.

"The ability to turn one's attention to this [aural] information is very wasteful," the analysis says, adding that the rarity - and even "aggressive nature" - of such warnings might lead to their being ignored.

Studies on visual-auditory conflict, it states, show a "natural tendency" to favour visual over auditory perception when information acquired by both senses appears to be contradictory.

"Piloting, calling heavily on visual activity, could lead pilots to a type of auditory insensitivity to the appearance of aural warnings that are rare and in contradiction with cockpit information," the analysis adds. Visual-auditory conflict during heavy workload translates into "attention selectivity" which accepts visual information but disregards critical aural warnings.

In June, Flightglobal was invited by civil and defense simulator manufacturer CAE to get hands-on with its Boeing 787 Series 7000 full-flight simulator. Mike Gerzanics, Flightglobal test pilot and current 737 captain and I traveled to Montreal, Canada for an up-close look at a new Level D simulator that will be used to train Continental's 787 pilots in Houston. Mike, who is also rated in the 777 authored a comprehensive flight test package about his impressions of the 787 simulator, its handling and features.


During the two hours we had with the simulator, Gerzanics and I flew the simulated skies over San Francisco in both normal and irregular operations. Here are some of his impressions:
I am type rated in both the 777 and 757/767, having flown them in engineering and maintenance capacity for a US legacy carrier. While it has been several years since my last flight in either type, I instantly felt at home in the 787. For my familiarisation preview flight of the 787 simulator, the empty weight was 113,500kg (250,000lb) and a fuel load of 68,000kg. The simulator was at San Francisco International, an airport with which I am familiar. CAE Capt Domenic Di Iorio sat in the right seat and guided me through the pre-start flows. Di Iorio also ran the electronic checklist.

By design, flows and procedures are similar to those I remember for the 777. While we typically would start both engines on the 777 at the same time, we started No 2 followed by No 1 in the 787 simulator. Regardless, the procedure is simple - start switch to start and start lever to on, the FADEC taking care of the rest. Flaps were set to 5, and the before-taxi checklist was accomplished using the smart electronic checklist.

During the taxi to Runway 28R I again marvelled at level of detail in the simulation. While never to be confused with the real thing, feeling concrete expansion joints while taxiing lends an air of authenticity. A reduced power take-off was accomplished, with indicated take-off speeds (V1/VR/V2) of 142/144/153kt respectively.

Rotation forces were on par with those I remembered from the 777, establishing a 10e_SDgr attitude and holding it until lift-off. Once airborne the gear was retracted and I followed the flight director guidance for the initial climb. Passing 1,000ft (300m) MSL the flaps were retracted at the reference flap speed bugs on the airspeed tape. A 250kt indicated airspeed climb to 5,000ft MSL was accomplished, and I steered the 787 towards the coast near Half Moon Bay, California.


Earlier this month, Southwest Airlines initiated RNP operations following a $175 million investment that will eventually see its entire fleet flying with RNP by the end of 2013. For the first part of the transition of its fleet to RNP operations, Southwest is changing the pilot's view from the flight deck of its 737-700s. RNP or Required Navigation Performance allows aircraft to fly more precise tailored paths between two points, enabling faster routes to cut flight times, noise, fuel consumption and carbon emissions.

737-700EFIS-MAP.jpg
737-700ND_PFD.jpg
Before transitioning to RNP, Southwest's 737-700s were set up so pilots would see the Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS/MAP) format gauges (top) placing the the attitude indicator, HSI, DME, airspeed indicator, altimeter and vertical speed indicator in the same location as the carrier's older 737-300s. Boeing provided this layout as an option to airlines to duplicate the functionality of the Classic 737 flight deck for the Next Generation variants. Southwest's EFIS/MAP format is now being replaced through a software change with the large format Primary Flight Display and Navigation Display (PFD/ND) to render the precision RNP approach and departure paths.

737-700EICAS.jpg
The PFD combines the individual features of the EFIS into a single integrated display with a speed tape to the left, altitude and vertical speed indicator to the right, compass at the bottom and brown and blue attitude indicator at the center, similar to the layout on the 777 and 747-400 and -8.

During its transition to the new displays, the airline has opted to keep the side-by-side format for the Common Display System (CDS) Engine Instrumentation and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) (left), displaying all relevant engine data on the same level as the navigation data. Again, this format was created to mirror the same geographical locations as the gauges on the 737-300 to maintain commonality with the Next Generation models. The "over-under" format was designed to mirror the 777's engine displays, by placing the 737's secondary engine gauges on the lower EICAS screen.

Additionally, the airline's 737-300s will be getting an even more extreme makeover for the RNP transition, starting with the installation of 15.4in LCD displays to replace the steam gauges analog dial gauges. The first -300s with the new large-screen displays are expected to enter the fleet in early 2011.

A very special thank you to the Southwest Airlines pilot who supplied these before and after photos from the front office aboard two Boeing 737-700 aircraft.
NWAA330.jpgI've been getting questions from many corners asking how it's possible that Air France 447, or any commercial aircraft for that matter, could cross an ocean without air traffic controllers knowing the exact location of the flight at all times?

Right now the only ubiquitous way to have a real time track of an aircraft is with a traditional radar system over or nearby land. Oceans present a unique challenge to aircraft crossing without radar coverage, even though it is done without incident hundreds, if not thousands, of times per day.

Since the early 1990s, pilots have used a system called FANS (Future Air Navigation System) that uses CPDLC (Controller Pilot Data Link Communications) and the older ACARS (Aircraft Communication Addressing and Reporting System) in lieu of voice communication with ATC. The CPDLC runs on ground based and satellite communications via Inmarsat.

Pilots interface with CPDLC via Flight Management Systems (747-400), Datalink Control & Display Unit (DCDU) panels (A330/A340) or Multi-Function Displays (A380, 777 & 787) to send/receive position reports, emergencies, route/speed/altitude changes, enroute weather reports and oceanic crossing clearances.

While cutting down the workload for both pilots and air traffic controllers, CPDLC was never intended to provide live flight tracking over the ocean. Instead, aircraft report their position at demarcated waypoints along the oceanic crossing and tell controllers when they expect to cross the next waypoint.

I ask: If it can be done on our cell phones, why not for our aircraft?

Air France 447 made a radio call crossing intersection INTOL, before the ACARS fault message was received from the aircraft about 54 nm from intersection TASIL, though the exact location of the crash is unknown as crews have begun to locate debris.

This leads directly into the biggest leap in air traffic control technology since the system was first created in the 1940s. The Next Generation Air Transport System, or Next Gen as it's known, will see the implementation of satellite based aircraft tracking with the GPS, called Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B). ADS-B technology transmits the location of the aircraft to within a few hundred feet of accuracy to both ground stations and other aircraft, rather than the 1-2 miles of accuracy with traditional radar.

The FAA plans to roll out Next Gen and ADS-B over almost a decade or longer, with airlines and industry groups pushing regulatory agencies to both move up deadlines for aircraft equipage and provide additional financial incentives to outfit aircraft. The ground-based portion of the system is expected to be deployed by 2013, but aircraft outfitting timelines remain an open question.

Right now, the FAA is providing financial assistance to United and US Airways to equip 747-400s and A330s with ADS-B equipment for trial testing, respectively. US Airways will have ADS-B on 20 of 25 of its new A330-200s for Atlantic crossings into Philadelphia. United will install the system on 12 747-400s for testing on Pacific flights between San Fransisco and Australia.

Australia announced in March that it plans to require all aircraft traveling through its airspace above FL290 by December 12, 2013 to comply with ADS-B requirements. The new air traffic system will cover the continent, as well as significant parts of its oceanic airspace. Though the Australians scaled back the plan as it took into account the pace of ATC developments in both Europe and the United States.

As the entire world looks for clues to the cause of Flight 447, technologies that make long haul air travel into areas without radar coverage safer may find themselves at the forefront of the lessons learned. Even if it is found that the cause of the crash is unrelated, a global situational awareness of aircraft position can help speed search and rescue missions, as well as aid in future accident investigations.

Advanced air navigation technologies have come out of air disasters before. In 1974, the FAA mandated Part 121 operators to install ground proximity warning systems in the wake of several controlled flight into terrain accidents in the early 1970s and later expanded that requirement to even smaller aircraft over the last thirty years.

Could this tragedy be the spur for global ADS-B coverage?
Last week, my colleague Lori Ranson and I were invited by Honeywell for an in-flight demonstration of the Primus Epic avionics platform with Synthetic Vision and RNP .1 capabilities that have been installed on the company's Gulfstream G550 (N933H).

The 90 minute flight, which was similar to a G450 flight from a year ago, took us down to Roanoke after we departed Dulles. We flew two approaches to runways 24 and 33 in Roanoke then back to Dulles for a nightime approach on runway 19C.

For a bit of additional background on the Honeywell/Gulfstream system, take a look back the four part series I published a year ago. The Enhanced Vision System II was on full display for this flight and was particularly useful as we spotted a wildfire off the end of the runway in Roanoke.

 
GE737-flightdeck.jpgSouthwest Airlines awarded a $40M to General Electric to retrofit its entire fleet of 737-300s with twin 15.4-inch SDS-6000 glass displays to enable RNP (Required Navigation Performance) operations across the overwhelming majority of its 737 fleet. 

Boeing will be responsible for the design, installation and integration of the new hardware and software, as well as flight testing and certification. The first production model is expected to be delivered in early 2011.
The integrated large area display suite and flight management system controls the aircraft track to an accuracy of 10 meters and the time of arrival to within 10 seconds to any point in the flight plan. Benefits include the ability to fly shorter flight paths and idle-thrust descents which reduces fuel consumption, thereby lowering emissions and community noise levels. Software and hardware updates provide the latest technology to continue to meet the needs of the world's evolving airspace requirements, offering safe and efficient improvements to aircraft operations.
According to Flight's ACAS database, Southwest operates 186 737-300 aircraft, though GE says only up to 150 -300s will receive the upgrade.

The 737-700 fleet are already equipped with the necessary hardware to carry out RNP operations, which are expected to launch on certain routes in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Boeing spokesman Bob Saling declined to speculate if future customers were in the pipeline, but added that "as Southwest is a leader in the low cost model, I think this is something other airlines will be looking at."

In addition, Boeing said it "didn't have any info at this point" if similar large glass displays would make their way into production standard Next Generation 737s in the form of a blockpoint change. Yet, as a narrow body replacement program moves farther to the right, a fresh flight deck (and a new engine) may serve as the basis for a 3 1/2 generation 737.

Image Courtesy General Electric
NBAA_header.jpg Avidyne invited me to come and see its new products in action at its NBAA booth last week. Tom Harper, Director of Marketing for Avidyne, showed off the the MLX770, which brings text messaging to general aviation, and the not-yet-officially-revealed IFD8000 15-inch twin glass displays with enhanced and synthetic vision systems. These are two very visual products, so I've created two videos for your viewing pleasure to see all the features on these new products.

IFD8000:


MLX770:
NBAA_header.jpgLearjet-85_exterior_sm.jpgBombardier unveiled its Learjet 85 cabin mock-up here at NBAA and I was invited to take a look inside the new Rockwell Collins Pro Line Fusion avionics suite.

UPDATE: See our walk through video of the Learjet 85 cabin mock-up.

The business end of the first composite Bombardier aircraft features three 15.1" (38.4 cm) Active Matrix Liquid Crystal Displays (AMLCD), Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS), Dual automatic Attitude Heading Reference System (AHRS), Integrated Flight Information System (IFIS) with electronic charts, One Class II Electronic Flight Bag (EFB), Synthetic Vision System for Situational Awareness (SVS), Terrain Awareness and Warning System (TAWS), Dual Flight Management System (FMS) and a weather radar system.

Wow, that's a lot of alphabet soup! Take a look:
Lear85_deck5.jpgLear85_deck3.jpg
More photos after the jump.
Have you ever seen "that guy" on the road? Have you even been "that guy?" You know, the one who feels compelled to text message while driving. What about while flying?

Well, starting in the fourth quarter of this year, Avidyne will begin delivering its MLX770 two-way Datalink Transceiver. For the first time, general aviation pilots will be able to send and receive SMS text messages directly through the multifunction display to mobile phones on the ground.

Avidyne says the response from customers has been "overwhelming." The practicality - and novelty - of such a system is immediately apparent, adding a useful communication tool with people on the ground if you're arrival is delayed.

Don't expect long conversations though, Avidyne has limited the length of outgoing messages to 32 characters and they are entered by control knob, not keyboard.

"You wouldn't be sitting up there chatting like you're on a cell phone or computer," says Tom Harper, director of marketing at Avidyne.

This feature, unlike a mobile plan, does not come with unlimited text messaging, rather each text message is expected to cost between $1 and $2 to send and receive because of the bandwidth usage on the Iridium satellites that enable the datalink. For every ten hours of flying, Avidyne expects the service to run between $70-120.

text_messagingMFD.jpg As for distracting the pilot, one would hope that we'll see aviate, navigate, communicate (then text message) hold true. A passenger sitting in the right seat can just as easily use the system as well.

The text messaging features are not disabled during climb or descent. Avidyne emphasizes that, "the pilot will use discretion and good judgment to acknowledge the message at the appropriate time. These messages are considered low priority (cyan) so if a higher priority Traffic Alert (yellow) or Terrain Alert (red) message comes up, it will appear on top of any incoming email message."

Cookies & Privacy