Top 100 Cities Destination Ranking
Global market research company Euromonitor International is pleased to release its Top 100 Cities Destination ranking, a list of the world’s top cities in terms of international tourist arrivals in 2011.
The rebound in global economic growth in 2011 contributed to stronger tourism demand, positively impacting results for the top 100 cities, with arrivals increasing 7%. Emerging city destinations located in Asia Pacific performed well thanks to a strong economic environment and intra-regional demand.
Hong Kong topped the ranking with more than 20 million arrivals in 2011, a nine percent increase over 2010. Hong Kong remains largely dependent on arrivals from China, but new themed events organized by the Hong Kong Tourism Board helped draw in visitors from other Asian countries this year. Indonesia, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand all registered double-digit growth in the number of trips to Hong Kong.
“While many cities maintained their previous rankings, Vietnam showed a particularly strong performance with Ho Chi Minh and Hanoi experiencing over 40% growth for the second consecutive year,” explains Caroline Bremner, Head of Travel and Tourism Research at Euromonitor International. “Although Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City will continue to be top tourist attractions in Vietnam, future demand is likely to be driven by other Vietnamese cities including Hue, Hoi An, Nha Trang and Phu Quoc emerging as international tourists look to discover more new places.”
Euromonitor International foresees an even stronger growth for arrivals in 2012. Because uncertainty in the global economy still exists, especially in the US and Europe, future growth will be driven by Asia Pacific, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. Less visa restrictions will further encourage tourism flows over 2012-2016.
Top City Destinations Ranking 2011 | |||||||
Country | City | Rank | 2011 Arrivals (000s) | 2011 Growth (%) | |||
Hong Kong, China | Hong Kong | 1 | 21830.2 | 8.8 | |||
Singapore | Singapore | 2 | 19818.1 | 8.7 | |||
United Kingdom | London | 3 | 15106.1 | 2.7 | |||
Malaysia | Kuala Lumpur | 4 | 13315.4 | 16.0 | |||
China | Macau | 5 | 12925.2 | 8.4 | |||
Thailand | Bangkok | 6 | 12357.4 | 12.5 | |||
Turkey | Antalya | 7 | 12052.4 | 13.3 | |||
China | Shenzhen | 8 | 10894.6 | 6.8 | |||
USA | New York City | 9 | 10038.0 | 3.5 | |||
Turkey | Istanbul | 10 | 9765.2 | 20.2 | |||
China | Guangzhou | 11 | 8875.5 | 8.9 | |||
France | Paris | 12 | 8403.5 | 3.5 | |||
United Arab Emirate | Dubai | 13 | 7741.0 | -0.1 | |||
China | Shanghai | 14 | 6911.7 | -5.8 | |||
USA | Miami | 15 | 6461.8 | 7.1 | |||
Saudi Arabia | Mecca | 16 | 6412.1 | 4.7 | |||
Thailand | Pattaya | 17 | 6002.9 | 10.5 | |||
Italy | Rome | 18 | 5966.2 | 4.5 | |||
USA | Las Vegas | 19 | 5387.1 | 4.2 | |||
Spain | Barcelona | 20 | 5366.4 | 4.0 | |||
Taiwan | Taipei | 21 | 5256.6 | 51.3 | |||
China | Beijing | 22 | 5152.7 | 5.1 | |||
USA | Los Angeles | 23 | 4918.4 | 8.1 | |||
Thailand | Phuket | 24 | 4893.9 | 9.5 | |||
Hungary | Budapest | 25 | 4376.9 | 8.5 | |||
Netherlands | Amsterdam | 26 | 4201.9 | 12.8 | |||
Russia | Moscow | 27 | 4170.0 | 11.5 | |||
USA | Orlando | 28 | 3825.2 | 4.1 | |||
Czech Republic | Prague | 29 | 3759.5 | 0.0 | |||
Germany | Berlin | 30 | 3711.3 | 7.5 | |||
Austria | Vienna | 31 | 3690.0 | 4.8 | |||
Turkey | Mugla | 32 | 3592.1 | 11.9 | |||
Vietnam | Ho Chi Minh | 33 | 3533.3 | 45.1 | |||
Spain | Madrid | 34 | 3431.0 | 0.8 | |||
Ukraine | Kiev | 35 | 3371.7 | 6.6 | |||
Poland | Warsaw | 36 | 3351.2 | 35.0 | |||
Ireland | Dublin | 37 | 3250.0 | -6.7 | |||
Egypt | Cairo | 38 | 3248.9 | -35.0 | |||
Turkey | Edirne | 39 | 3181.3 | 9.3 | |||
China | Zhuhai | 40 | 3179.9 | -2.2 | |||
India | Chennai | 41 | 3174.5 | 14.0 | |||
China | Hangzhou | 42 | 3148.7 | 14.2 | |||
Argentina | Buenos Aires | 43 | 2967.7 | 9.2 | |||
USA | San Francisco | 44 | 2924.3 | 2.9 | |||
Russia | St Petersburg | 45 | 2900.0 | 16.0 | |||
South Korea | Seoul | 46 | 2857.1 | 1.7 | |||
Mexico | Mexico City | 47 | 2847.4 | 3.7 | |||
Japan | Tokyo | 48 | 2748.2 | -28.0 | |||
Canada | Toronto | 49 | 2737.4 | 0.3 | |||
India | Delhi | 50 | 2702.6 | 15.0 | |||
Australia | Sydney | 51 | 2626.0 | 0.2 | |||
Indonesia | Denpasar | 52 | 2559.5 | 0.5 | |||
Mexico | Cancún | 53 | 2492.9 | 9.1 | |||
Peru | Lima | 54 | 2442.4 | 30.0 | |||
China | Suzhou | 55 | 2365.8 | 14.0 | |||
Romania | Bucharest | 56 | 2350.0 | 10.0 | |||
India | Mumbai | 57 | 2349.0 | 7.0 | |||
Belgium | Brussels | 58 | 2285.0 | 2.1 | |||
Dominican Republic | Punta Cana | 59 | 2232.9 | 11.0 | |||
South Africa | Johannesburg | 60 | 2180.3 | 8.4 | |||
Germany | Munich | 61 | 2134.6 | 4.0 | |||
France | Nice | 62 | 2134.1 | 2.6 | |||
New Zealand | Auckland | 63 | 2100.0 | 7.7 | |||
Portugal | Lisbon | 64 | 2099.8 | 5.4 | |||
India | Agra | 65 | 2085.4 | 15.0 | |||
Italy | Milan | 66 | 2074.5 | 4.8 | |||
India | Jaipur | 67 | 2061.7 | 16.0 | |||
Morocco | Marrakech | 68 | 2052.3 | 1.2 | |||
Egypt | Sharm el Sheikh | 69 | 2005.2 | -21.6 | |||
Saudi Arabia | East Province | 70 | 1996.5 | 6.4 | |||
Syria | Damascus | 71 | 1988.1 | -18.4 | |||
Canada | Vancouver | 72 | 1894.3 | -6.6 | |||
Indonesia | Jakarta | 73 | 1893.2 | 0.3 | |||
Bulgaria | Burgas | 74 | 1859.7 | 7.7 | |||
Syria | Aleppo | 75 | 1856.5 | -12.3 | |||
Italy | Venice | 76 | 1832.7 | 4.7 | |||
Philippines | Manila | 77 | 1821.5 | 23.0 | |||
Italy | Florence | 78 | 1817.2 | 4.5 | |||
Bulgaria | Varna | 79 | 1813.9 | 7.4 | |||
Kenya | Nairobi | 80 | 1812.0 | 40.3 | |||
USA | Honolulu | 81 | 1801.0 | 2.8 | |||
Greece | Athens | 82 | 1786.6 | 2.0 | |||
Vietnam | Hanoi | 83 | 1750.0 | 41.5 | |||
New Zealand | Christchurch | 84 | 1735.0 | -0.5 | |||
United Arab Emirate | Abu Dhabi | 85 | 1725.0 | 6.3 | |||
Brazil | Rio de Janeiro | 86 | 1722.7 | 7.0 | |||
China | Guilin | 87 | 1698.9 | 14.3 | |||
Australia | Melbourne | 88 | 1677.0 | 14.4 | |||
Brazil | São Paulo | 89 | 1648.0 | 3.0 | |||
Thailand | Chiang Mai | 90 | 1632.0 | 6.3 | |||
USA | Washington DC | 91 | 1615.8 | 2.6 | |||
Saudi Arabia | Riyadh | 92 | 1610.1 | 6.5 | |||
Azerbaijan | Baku | 93 | 1589.9 | 8.6 | |||
Turkey | Izmir | 94 | 1532.9 | 27.1 | |||
China | Nanjing | 95 | 1497.9 | 14.4 | |||
Bulgaria | Sofia-City & Greater Are | 96 | 1468.0 | 9.7 | |||
Kyrgyzstan | Issyk-Kulskaya Oblast | 97 | 1450.5 | 57.6 | |||
Belarus | Minsk | 98 | 1437.7 | 2.8 | |||
India | Kolkatta | 99 | 1431.6 | 9.0 | |||
Switzerland | Zurich | 100 | 1424.0 | 3.3 |
Michelle Grant, travel and tourism research manager at Euromonitor International discusses key findings from the list
View previous rankings
Top 100 Cities Destination Ranking 2010
Top 100 Cities Destination Ranking 2009
Top 100 Cities Destination Ranking 2008
Top 150 Cities Destination Ranking 2006
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Annual research programme
Euromonitor International's Top City Destinations Ranking (2011 edition) was built from the results of the global travel research programme conducted in 57 core countries by in-country analysts, which follows Euromonitor International’s methodology and definitions for travel and tourism.
City arrivals data was sourced directly from national statistics offices, airport arrivals, hotel/accommodation stays or other methods for all 57 core countries and 153 market insight countries under review.
Main secondary sources included governmental, inter-governmental and other official sources; national and international specialist trade press and trade associations; industry study groups and other semi-official sources; and reports published by major operators, travel retailers, online databases and the financial, business and mainstream press. Trade interviews were conducted with national tourist offices, trade associations and travel operators to fill gaps in secondary research.
Country data was then cross-checked on a regional basis by the regional research teams based in London, Vilnius, Chicago and Singapore. Examples of regional sources reviewed included TourMis and European Cities Marketing for Europe. Further top-down checks were conducted by the in-house global research team. Where irregularities were found between editions, supplementary research was conducted to confirm or amend those findings. Euromonitor International is satisfied that the results of the in-country research, coupled with the top-down global perspective, ensure that the Top City Destinations Ranking is robust with a high level of data validation.
It is important to note that the Top City Destinations Ranking is not an exhaustive list and that its purpose is to highlight leading cities gleaned from the findings of Euromonitor International’s annual research programme, with the emphasis on cities, rather than popular holiday resorts.
Research Method
Data Research Method |
City |
Airport Arrivals |
Agra, Amsterdam, Chennai, Delhi, Jaipur, Kolkatta, Kuala Lumpur, Moscow, Mumbai, Punta Cana, Taipei |
Airport Arrivals and Hotel/Accommodation |
Buenos Aires, Cairo, Sharm el Sheikh |
Hotel/Accommodation |
Athens, Berlin, Cancún, Florence, Lima, Marrakech, Mexico City, Milan, Paris, Prague, Rome, Venice, Vienna |
National Statistics Office |
Abu Dhabi, Bangkok, Barcelona, Beijing, Brussels, Budapest, Chiang Mai, Denpasar, Dubai, Dublin, Edinburgh, East Province, Guangzhou, Guilin, Hangzhou, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh, Hong Kong, Honolulu, Jakarta, Las Vegas, Lisbon, London, Los Angeles, Macau, Madrid, Manila, Mecca, Miami, Minsk, Munich, Nanjing, New York City, Nice, Orlando, Pattaya, Phuket, Rio De Janeiro, Riyadh, San Francisco, São Paulo, Seoul, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Singapore, Suzhou, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Vancouver, Washington DC, Zhuhai, Zurich |
Other method |
Aleppo, Antalya, Auckland, Baku, Bucharest, Burgas, Christchurch, Damascus, Edirne, Issyk-Kulskaya Oblast, Istanbul, Izmir, Johannesburg, Kiev, Mugla, Nairobi, Sofia-City & Greater Area, St Petersburg, Varna, Warsaw |
Source: Euromonitor International
Chinese arrival inclusions
Overnight visitors from mainland China are included in the Hong Kong arrivals data. Overnight visitors from mainland China and Hong Kong are included in the Macau arrivals data. Overnight visitors from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan are included in the Beijing arrivals data.
Footnotes
Country/City |
Notes |
All countries/cities |
Exclude day trippers and domestic visitors |
Singapore |
Includes Malaysian citizens arriving by land |
Saudi Arabia |
Official data is for provinces only |
Issyk-Kulskaya Oblast |
Region surrounding the Issyk-Kul Lake |
Source: Euromonitor International
Definitions
International arrivals by city includes visitors from abroad that arrive at the city under review as their first point of entry, and also includes those visitors to the city that arrived in the country via a different point of entry, but then go on to visit the city in question during their trip.
Arrivals refers to international tourists, ie any person visiting another country for at least 24 hours, for a period not exceeding 12 months, and staying in collective or private accommodation. Each arrival is counted separately and includes people travelling more than once a year and people visiting several countries during one holiday. Domestic visitors are excluded. This encompasses all purposes of visit, such as business, leisure and visiting friends and relatives.
Euromonitor International’s arrival figures exclude same-day visitors, transit and cruise passengers as this can distort arrival figures at important border crossings and cruise destinations respectively. It also excludes those in paid employment abroad. Students that stay in a country for a period of more than 12 months are excluded and are considered as temporary residents. Military personnel and transportation crew are excluded, along with displaced people because of war or natural disasters.
The ranking focuses on capital city hubs and tends to exclude beach and ski resorts that may enjoy high volumes of international visitors.
« Attend Our PCHi-Euromonitor Seminar "Reinventing Beauty: New Growth Models in China and Beyond" | Main | The Quest for Natural Revisited »
I look forward to reading this report annually, however I'm surprised to see Syria - Damascus ranking at 71 , despite the conflict there, overtaking cities like Vancouver, Athen, Hanoi and Rio de Janeiro. The report also does not mention anything about he middle east uprising, which effected travel plans (including myself) and possibly stricken off most peoples 'places to visit' lists for now.
Posted by: Joe Mendonca | January 23, 2013 at 06:02 AM
Hi Joe,
Syria received 3.7 million international arrivals in 2011 (down 30% because of the conflict). It is a very popular destination for Middle Easterners and there are many expatriates that come back to visit. As a result, international arrivals to Damascus are significant despite experiencing an 18.4% decline in 2011. It is likely that arrivals in 2012 will be even lower because of the conflict.
Due to space constraints, we didn't touch upon the Arab Spring, but you can see the impact that it has had on Egyptian cities of Cairo and Sharm El Sheikh, which experienced declines of 35% and 22% respectively in 2011.
Please let us know if you have more questions, and thanks for reading!
Posted by: Jamie Maynard | January 30, 2013 at 09:43 AM
Kuala Lumpur-Malaysia, 4th is fantastic. Malaysia has little to offer (tourist attractions) but the food, hospitality and the warmth from the multi ethnics and cultures makes your day.
Posted by: Patrick | February 5, 2013 at 12:56 AM
Philippines
I really believe this country has a lot to offer, from beaches to night parties.. With the its major cities Manila, Cebu, and Davao. . I think i will be back here in this beautiful country.
It's really more fun in the Philippines!! Love this.
Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2013 at 02:01 AM
Dubai is a growing destination city ...
Posted by: Husein M. | February 21, 2013 at 01:17 AM
It's more fun in the PHILIPPINES!
Posted by: Mahaliah Andam | March 31, 2013 at 10:58 PM
Just a question. Is Hongkong data includes business trip visitors? Shenzhen is also in the top ten, and I frequently visit both country/city because of business visit rather than tourism.
Posted by: Arnold | April 10, 2013 at 01:35 AM
Hi Arnold,
Yes - This ranking includes business trip visitors as well.
Posted by: Jamie Maynard | April 17, 2013 at 04:31 PM
Hi
While I am impressed with this data..and this does give me a lot of insights into my research, i couldn't help but notice that some of the best locations in India have not made their place into the list.
While I do see Agra up there (which got a lot of accolades after being featured in Slumdog..), the rest of the destinations I see are mostly big cities.
Because of this reason, I think only basing the statistics on number of arrivals would make the data skewed... Mumbai, Chennai and Delhi having the biggest International Airports in India, would obviously have higher arrivals. But are these the destinations the tourists actually intend to travel to? This is the important question that I guess this data does not reveal or shed light on.
Example: People arriving in Mumbai, may be keeping it as a pit stop en route to Goa or Madhya Pradesh. People travelling to Chennai may be keeping it as a pit stop en route to Pondicherry, or Kerala or Andaman Island.
Posted by: Sree | April 19, 2013 at 12:54 AM
This data can be viewed differently by a lot of people. The high rankings from China are simply because of business and truckloads of Chinese tourists crossing into Hong Kong just to "see it" and shop. They will stay only 1- 2 days and then go back. As regards the other cities in China well this is purely business. There is a very poor tourist infrastructure here for foreigners and in my opinion there is not a lot of nice spots to visit. The western concept of tourist holiday is completely different and has cultural high lights, food, interior travel, individualized travel ideas and of course a longer time span. I have seen this after 3 years in China. The Chinese simply show up to a spot, get out of the packed tourist bus, go en masse following a person with a flag, take photos to the 'spot'and then get back into the bus.. Personally I'd rather stay at home ..so quite a mis-leading article. Business and tourist visits are two very different concepts..not to mention a 1-3 day package tour is a very different concept to an immersion holiday
Posted by: mauracusack | April 19, 2013 at 01:43 AM