By
Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
What
if the next big 9/11 is Aliens/UFOs landing? If that were to indeed
transpire, it is my bet that Muslims worldwide will be the first to
accept it --- they will race to join the imperial narrative of the
new intergalactic catastrophe in exactly the same manner as Pakistan
did for the first catastrophic terrorism imperial narrative of 9/11
'war on terror'. This is what I wrote in 2008:
'The
abominable shared fates that unite Iran (“Bush and Iran,
again”, WSJ April 15, 2008), and Pakistan, from President Bush
calling Pakistan “Terror Central” in 2007, to this week,
April 13, 2008, 'clairvoyantly' asserting that “If another
September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is being
plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan”. And as already noted
in its March 29, 2008 heads-up warning to America by Project
Humanbeingsfirst (“Nuclear attack on Iran appears imminent!”),
when such a “planned” attack transpires, it “will
make Sept. 11 pale by comparison” (Bush, Feb. 13, 2008).'
What
can make "Sept. 11 pale by comparison" according to the
former President of the United States? Well, I don't rightly know,
but according to the likely candidates usually prognosticated by the
super visionaries on both the Left and the Right, these range from
false-flag nuclear terror attack on American or its Allies' soil
blamed on any of the "Terror Centals" in the world,
including Pakistan and Iran; to new plagues and viruses requiring
Defcon-2 Alert and forced vaccinations; to some even suggest planets
colliding with each other – well of course, but of course, as
James Bond would repartee to M were he invited to plan it all out in
the next sequel on how to create world government for the City of
London.
None
of these scenarios still create the kind of credible threat that can
unite mankind permanently into a one-world government. Surely the CFR
and the Rockefeller Foundation that excel in scenario
analysis
must be agonizing over it. As Ronald Reagan read off from his script
at the UN podium barely hinting at the thought processes going on
behind the scenes in the Iron
Mountain
underground vaults:
“If
suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species
from another planet,” President Ronald Reagan had read out loud
from his script at the United Nations General Assembly podium in
1987, “in our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we
often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we
need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common
bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide
would vanish, if we were facing an alien threat from outside this
world!” --- President Ronald Reagan, Speaking at the UN General
Assembly, September 21, 1987
I
fear that the Muslim public mind, led by its Mullahs, just as they
did last time led by the General, will announce their 'United We
Stand' against this new global intergalactic catastrophic threat of
terrorism by aliens before anyone even comes asking them to join the
coalition of the willing. Last time, or so the narratives say, it
only took a phone call. I don't really subscribe to that public
relations line because the General was implanted into the matrix long
before, to de-nuke Pakistan before the launch pad to the war in
Afghanistan could pragmatically be mobilized. I have no proof of this
but immanent game-theory scenario analysis indicates to me that
Pakistan does not have any Nuclear weapons, at least not as a viable
option at least before September 11, 2001.
Anyway,
not to digress, this time around, Pakistani Mullahs like
Tahir-ul-Qadri (among the Sunnis pushing “moderate Islam”),
and perhaps Jawad Naqvi (among the shias pushing “revolutionary
Islam”), and perhaps al Qaeda (among the fanatics pushing
“militant Islam”), and I am certain every country will
have their own such mullahs and their own such group mobilizations,
including Iraq-Iran's Ayatollahs in residence and Egypt-Saudi Muftis
on the pulpits, all pulling together behind the same hectoring
hegemons against the new global threat. Those lagging behind will be
the religious Christians, as theologically, they are the center of
creation, Jesus died for their sins, so how can aliens even exist?
Muslims will take the lead because theologically, God even proclaims
in the Holy Qur'an that He is “Lord of the Worlds” (Surah
Al-Waqia 56:80)
and has sent His Criterion as “an admonition to all creatures”
(Surah al-Furqaan 25:1).
Both those simple and elegant verses, already memorized by 99 percent
of the Muslims, will be used to prove that alien landing is a divine
miracle. The Muslims will bow in sajdah all day long---it will be
sight to behold with some raconteur at the Rand Corporation actually
peeing in his pant from unstoppable laughter. The moment the aliens
draw first blood however, the Muslim Ayatollah and Mufti will join
forces to lead the battle against the evil-doers, eagerly uniting
behind the hectoring hegemons all of 2 billion Muslims worldwide in
much the same way as the General previously coerced merely the 200
million in Pakistan behind them.
All
war-menacing stances and posturing the West has today against “Terror
Central” Iran, unless Iran has already been wiped out or used
up as a threat, will themselves be washed away without batting an eye
--- fabricated as this enemy is to begin with. It is a sad loss of
objectivity for the shia Muslim mind of Pakistan, just like any sad
loss of objectivity for any group-think, that it accepts the
propaganda line of Iran being their savior, while the rest of the
sunni Muslim mind worldwide accepts the propaganda line of the West
that Iran is the devil incarnate. The truth is elsewhere. But not to
digress once again.
Why
do I believe this new 9/11 could very well be aliens landing? It
could of course always be preceded by the mahdi and the messiah
together arriving as well, on NASA's Universal Holographic Satellite
Projection System (I made that up) but I needlessly digress again.
But were that to happen as well, it will be to play the Armageddon
card instead of the alien card. This is what I wrote in 2009 on that
front:
'Whereas,
the poor monetary reformer fighting the fabricated financial crisis,
already the underdog and resourceless in going against an entrenched
financial oligarchy with infinitely deep pockets, is also outwitted
by the sheer magnitude of the Hegelian design for Global Governance.
The momentum created by the disparate crises spanning the gamut of
global financial meltdown, global warming, global pandemic, global
war on terror, is insurmountable enough. Imagine if the next global
crisis after global food panic and global crop failure, is alien
sightings and landings!
It
will be the coup de grace for bringing the fractious humanity finally
together in one-world government “if suddenly there was a
threat to this world from some other species from another planet.”
As President Ronald Reagan had read out loud from his script at the
United Nations podium in 1987: “we often forget how much unites
all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal
threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think
how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing
an alien threat from outside this world”:
Coming
soon to your local friendly skies, complete with the 'messiah' and
the 'mahdi' descending from the heavens on the wings of dove, or the
chariots of fire, in their final return to save the now united
mankind against the common threats. Maybe there is something to this
'dajjal' story, the 'false messiah' lore after all! Brought to you
courtesy of NASA's Universal Holographic Satellite Projection
System.'
But
I dare to think that the alien card appears more likely --- as the
mahdi-messiah card could induce “uncontrolled predictability”
into the already stochastic equations of game theory. “Controlled
chaos” is what is needed for cementing world government. But if
part of the scenario is to get Muslims and Israel to wage the epic
battle of population reduction, that Armageddon can surely reduce the
earth's population by half in no time.
Well,
while I do not have a crystal ball any more clairvoyant than anyone
else (except that people like Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR surpass
all others in uncannily presaging the vilest form of dystopia with an
accuracy that puts Nostradamus to shame),
some real-time data-mining on the crescendo of propaganda on Aliens
and UFOs is the hint for the new galactic catastrophe being staged to
surpass 9/11. It is far more controllable as a chaos than the arrival
of the mahdi and the messiah which will unleash pure uncontrolled
fanaticism worldwide. Not sure how anyone could ever control that,
even with the stochastic finesse of game
theory and infinite supercomputers housed near electric power plants
and flowing rivers.
Here
is two counterfeit pennies worth of game-theory scenario analysis for
alien landing extracted from the real everyday tunes and harmonics of
the Mighty
Wurlitzer.
Mining
Propaganda to Uncover Agenda BEFORE it is a Fait Accompli
Returning
back to the “vulgar
propagandist” (I keep that epithet in quotes
deliberately to emphasize the fact that apart from its veracity, it's
also the product of WWF wrestling), we already see the
empirical results of the uncannily predictive clairvoyance of
America's and Israel's greatest establishmentarians concerning
'Islamic Terror' which goes by many names including “blowback”.
The
fate of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, the entire Middle East, the “arc
of crisis” and the “global zone of percolating
violence”, all have something real in common today because
of such amazing fortune telling by the masters of discourse years in
advance: “the peoples of Islam will be the first and
greatest victims.” Please refer back to the already
mentioned report: Instrumenting
Kosovo in the 'arc
of crisis'
and the 'global
zone of percolating violence'.
So,
ought the public to take the superlative masters of discourse and the
assorted “vulgar propagandist” a tad more seriously when
they initially spew new absurdities enroute to successful mantra
creation years in advance? And, before its eventual harvesting under
the cataclysmic shock-effects of the “new pearl harbor”,
makes their predictive boast: “They will not be alone,
and many others will suffer with them”, an unalterable
grotesque reality?
One
of course already observes some of that Bernard Lewis' sponsored
clairvoyant suffering of the innocent in America itself. While its
own body-count is minuscule in comparison to Iraq, Afghanistan,
Pakistan, others experiencing 'revolutions' and 'democracy' in the
Middle East, not to mention PTSD suffered by its veterans which too
pales in comparison to what the valiant have wrecked upon the
'untermenschen' (see Letter
to Editor: PTSD and its Cure),
one with eyes wide open substantially notes that:
the
American national debt is soaring because of its perpetual 'War on
Terror' and the financial malfeasance of its financial elite;
its
bankruptcies and joblessness have shattered the 'American Dream' of
its public;
its
de-industrialization by having off-shored all its manufacturing and
production capacity is at an all time peak;
the
mighty superpower is now a police-state the likes of which was
hitherto only presaged in fictional narratives like George Orwell's
1984;
and
the once mighty industrial nation may be merged into a larger
supra-national regional entity similar to the EU as a consequence of
all these crises conditions.
Can
one therefore, perceptively not surmise that the deceased Ali Baba's
replacement nemesis will be a Super Ali Baba Plus Plus to
complete the job started by Zbigniew Brzezinski and Israeli
Intelligence agents' clairvoyance? What can this new threat possibly
be that it will even eclipse Osama Bin Laden in his magical prowess?
Can
the public shrewdly anticipate and prepare for the next boogeyman
based on the tunes now being played by the Mighty Wurlitzer, rather
than be shell-shocked into acquiescence by its phantasmic unveiling?
Just as the world was, and still is, shell-shocked into acquiescence
due to the Catastrophic
Terrorism
of 9/11
which, like the Pearl Harbor, inevitably divided our past and our
future into ‘before’ and ‘after’.
One
often hears it stated in the news and in the Western governments'
increasingly draconian regulations to keep their public safe from
terrorists, that 9/11 changed everything. Well, the super 9/11 of the
Super Ali Baba Plus Plus so clairvoyantly predicted by George W.
Bush, “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”
(Bush White House, Feb.
13, 2008)!
Can
one intelligently not data-mine propaganda itself, in the backdrop of
the Mighty Wurlitzer's unhidden motivations and agendas, to
accurately perceive and preempt what's up next?
The
following passage from the 2500 years old Art
of War
is pertinent backdrop to the aforementioned chutzpah of empire –
a zeitgeist in which the scholars of empire announce their intentions
brazenly years in advance, while the detractors of empire excel in
the ex post facto narrations of what is already a fait accompli after
the “history's actors” have acted and created “new
realities”. The instruments of empire award their own
antagonists high honors and great accolades for their bold rehearsal
and dissection of histories amidst the fawning adulation of all their
followers having their new 'ah hah' and 'never again' moments for the
first time in their life. And the cycle repeats again and again for
each new act of the “history's actors”:
'8.
To see victory only when it is within the ken of the common herd is
not the acme of excellence.
9.
Neither is it the acme of excellence if you fight and conquer and the
whole Empire says, "Well done!"
10.
To lift an autumn hair is no sign of great strength; to see the sun
and moon is no sign of sharp sight; to hear the noise of thunder is
no sign of a quick ear.'
Paying
particular attention to item 10., one may conclude that to perceive
and anticipate in a timely manner that which is not obvious to others
leads to many tactical as well as strategic advantages, both in the
battle of hegemony and secrecy, and, in the battle against tyranny.
Which is why the public and their lauded dissent chiefs are always,
but always, kept busy in idiotic puppetshows by the Machiavelli when
it is most essential that they be shrewdly sighted.
Public
preemption can be effective in derailing
imperial mobilization
only BEFORE it becomes a fait accompli. Ex post facto, when the
public eventually wakes up to ascertain that it was indeed all a
puppetshow, it is inevitably too late to do anything about the matter
except to “study” what the “history's actors”
have left behind! Obsessing
with the previous fait accompli
when dissent chiefs lead the effort, evidently, is also a calculated
part of Machiavelli. The principle of temporal urgency in maintaining
utmost deception (and secrecy) while “new realities”
are being planned, orchestrated, and harvested, was articulated by
Niccolò Machiavelli in The
Prince.
The modern day version of this predatory statecraft is the National
Security Council Directive NSC 10/2 for creating cover stories and
red herrings alongside covert operations. See Anatomy
of Conspiracy
Theory
( http://tinyurl.com/cognitive-diversity
).
As
part of that plan to deflect public attention, those attempting to
see through its fog of deception when a fait accompli can still be
averted – before missiles have left their silos, before pen has
been put to tortuous legalisms to sanction tyranny – are
variously labeled as 'kooks', 'conspiracy theorists', 'delusional',
'denier',
etc., their efforts infiltrated and subverted (as in cointelpro), and
their energies defocussed by introducing what's cynically called
“beneficial cognitive
diversity” (see Cass
Sunstein,
and this counterpoint
to dissent-chief David Ray Griffin's “eureka” moment on
Cass Sunstein's “Conspiracy Theories”).
So
What's Next according to Project Humanbeingsfirst?
Caption
The Next Global Threat? A Super Ali Baba Plus Plus to Terrify Mankind
With? (The U.S. Air Force first began experimenting with flying
saucers in the 1950s. Why - to deceive the former USSR, or, to induce
global mass
panic?
See Hadley
Cantril
)
Caption
Earth must prepare for close encounter with aliens, say scientists
UN should co-ordinate plans for dealing with extraterrestrials –
and we can't guarantee that aliens will be friendly Evolution on
alien worlds is likely to be Darwinian, which may mean
extraterrestrials share our tendencies for violence and
exploitation. (Image via UK Guardian, 10 January 2011 Photograph:
Rex)
Caption
'Proof of (alien) life? A copy of the 1950 memo that recounts the
discovery of flying saucers and aliens in New Mexico. The memo has
been published on the FBI website' --- UK
Daily Mail 9th April 2011.
A
more perceptive caption however would read: 'The Art of the
Mighty Wurlitzer: How to fabricate Aliens and UFOs Myths using the
ploy of leaking State-Secrets'
“If
suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species
from another planet,” President Ronald Reagan had read
out loud from his script at the United Nations General Assembly
podium in 1987, “in our obsession with antagonisms of
the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of
humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us
recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our
differences worldwide would vanish, if we were facing an alien
threat from outside this world!” --- President
Ronald Reagan, Speaking at the UN General Assembly, September 21,
1987
“It
should be as statistical as human nature, for example, that there's
going to be good guys and bad guys,” says Dr. Travis
Taylor, who's with the U.S. Space and Missile Command Department and
has worked with the Department of Defense and NASA for 20 years.
“What
we would hope is that the good guys show up first, and that would be
really nice. But the point of this wasn't to debate whether they
are or they aren't, it's what happens if they did. Do we have a
plan? What type of plan should we put together, and how would we
defend the planet?” Taylor has also written the handbook
for harrying aliens, An Introduction to Planetary Defense.
Lt.
Col. Brian De Toy, director of defense and strategic studies program
at West Point, doesn't buy the premise. “I am a skeptical
believer in miracles. So a year ago right now I was in Iraq, and I'm
more worried about Iraq and Afghanistan right now and the aliens
that I'm dealing with there. And so right now, I'm pretty skeptical
about the others.”'
--- National Geographic, Reported by Boston Herald May 17, 2011
'Aliens
might have souls and could choose to be baptised if humans ever met
them, a Vatican scientist said today. The official also
dismissed intelligent design as “bad theology” that had
been “hijacked” by American creationist fundamentalists.
Guy
Consolmagno, who is one of the pope's astronomers, said he would be
“delighted” if intelligent life was found among the
stars. “But the odds of us finding it, of it being intelligent
and us being able to communicate with it – when you add them
up it's probably not a practical question.”
Speaking
ahead of a talk at the British Science Festival in Birmingham
tomorrow, he said that the traditional definition of a soul was to
have intelligence, free will, freedom to love and freedom to make
decisions. “Any entity – no matter how many
tentacles it has – has a soul.” Would he baptise
an alien? “Only if they asked.”' --- UK
Guardian 17 Sep 2010
'Mazlan
Othman, a Malaysian astrophysicist, is set to be tasked with
co-ordinating humanity’s response if and when
extraterrestrials make contact. Aliens who landed on earth and
asked: “Take me to your leader” would be directed
to Mrs Othman. ... But Professor Stephen Hawking has warned that
alien interlopers should be treated with caution. He said: “I
imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the
resources from their home planet. The outcome for us would be much
as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t
turn out very well for the Native Americans.”' --- UK
Telegraph 26 Sep 2010
PROPAGANDA
REDUX
ASK
YOURSELF TO TEST YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOU HAVE JUST LEARNED
Is
it not strange that the US Military is openly playing “war
games” for the absurd possibility of an Alien Attack within
just 25 years of President
Ronald Reagan
expressing the Beneficial Consequences of a Hypothetical Alien
Threat From Outside This World speaking at the UN General
Assembly, Sept. 21, 1987? Is it not absurd that they even appoint a
UN Ambassador to greet the aliens with “souls”
seeking to be baptised when they ask earthlings in English
“Take
me to your leader”
(sic!)?
What
motivation drives the Hard Road to World Order which continually
requires crafting new fabled threats, new absurdities, new wars, new
crises?
Fabricating
a public discourse on an absurd fantasy as if it's something real by
couching it in the veneer of science (or declassified
State-Secrets/whistleblowing) and then reacting to that invention at
supra-national levels from the United Nations to the Catholic
Church, only legitimizes such discourse thus setting the stage for
the later creation of a new insurmountable global threat, the Clash
of Planets. If political scientists are to be believed on the
utility of diabolical protocols for “imperial
mobilization”, then, “that exercise requires a
high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and
patriotic gratification.” Its doctrinal seeds must be
planted years in advance. This too will surely also be launched with
“either you are with us, or with the aliens”! ---
The
Agenda Behind Aliens and UFOs.
The
Alien-UFO Agenda is one such future fait accompli in the works which
can still be averted by the public becoming rationally informed about
the demonic art of the Mighty Wurlitzer. The fact that:
-
the
fact that the FBI recently made available a 1950 Roswell
UFO memo
lending “UFOs” a legitimacy in the gullible mind by way
of it being held as a supposed “state-secret” for these
past sixty years ;
the
fact that US military is even playing war-games to interdict
UFOs
(USAF couldn't interdict 9/11 airplanes and are therefore
determined, one surmises, to not fail against an alien UFO
technology that is advanced enough to visit earth from another
galaxy) ;
the
fact that there is a pertinent office at the United Nations, UNOOSA,
with “the plan to make Unoosa the co-ordinating body for
dealing with alien encounters [which] will be debated by UN
scientific advisory committees and should eventually reach the
body’s general assembly”, and a special UN
Ambassador
has been “tasked with co-ordinating humanity’s
response if and when extraterrestrials make contact” ;
and
the uptick in other bogus
and absurd conversations
on Aliens and UFO even appearing in the mainstream media, not to
mention its unrelenting repetition in the so called “alternate
media” and on the internet ;
all
indicate that its unveiling time is likely approaching near.
The
reaction to this super nemesis too will surely also be launched with
“either you are with us, or with the aliens” false
dialectics!
If
the public can preempt that propaganda by focussing on unraveling the
many facets and scenarios on what they Machiavellianly plan to do
BEFORE they enact them, the vile psy-ops can surely be defeated
BEFORE it becomes the new established “facts” on the
ground for the globalists' coup de grâce: the final
restructuring of the planet into world
government
( http://tinyurl.com/ftworldgov).
In
order to perceptively comprehend the psychological basis of such
absurd and fabricated threats which instill existential fears:
whose
import to enabling “imperial mobilization” was
clearly envisaged by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1996 in The
Grand
Chessboard:
“It
is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be
autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially
its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist
democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of
power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in
conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of
domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense
spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among
professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to
democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization.” (pgs. 35-36) ;
whose
raison d'être as the primary method for advancing “the
"national interest" by means of organized violence”,
was taken as axiomatic in the 1963-64 secret study reported in the
1967 book The
Report From Iron Mountain:
“It
must be emphasized that the precedence of a society's war-making
potential over its other characteristics is not the result of the
"threat" presumed to exist at any one time from other
societies. This is the reverse of the basic situation; "threats"
against the "national interest" are usually created or
accelerated to meet the changing needs of the war system. ... The
military, or ostensible function of the war system requires no
elaboration; it serves simply to defend or advance the "national
interest" by means of organized violence. It is often
necessary for a national military establishment to create a need for
its unique powers—to maintain the franchise, so to speak.
And a healthy military apparatus requires "exercise," by
whatever rationale seems expedient, to prevent its atrophy.”
(pgs. 31,33) ;
whose
utility for effectively embarking on the “military
transformation” required to achieve “full
spectrum dominance” that wasn't “stillborn”,
was openly declared in the Project for the New American Century
(PNAC) report titled Rebuilding
America's Defenses:
“Further,
the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary
change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and
catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. ... Until the
process of transformation is treated as an enduring military mission
– worthy of constant allocation of dollars and forces –
it will remain stillborn” (pgs. 51,58) ;
and
whose necessity for rapidly transforming an entire society, nation,
or the whole world, in the direction desired by the controlling
oligarchy, was even discovered in the 1908 minute books of the
Carnegie Endowment for Peace by the Congressional Reece Committee
investigator Norman Dodd in 1954, and related by him in an interview
before his death in 1982, The
Hidden Agenda of Tax Exempt Foundations for World Government:
“We
are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie
Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for
the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed
throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The
question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war,
assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And
they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is
known to humanity. So then, in 1909, they raised the second
question and discussed it, namely: 'How do we involve the United
States in a war?'” ;
Closing
Arguments
There
is a lot to learn here on deliberate Machiavellian social engineering
that is not taught even in the best universities in America (and the
West), nor ever makes an appearance on CNN Headline News (and Time or
Newsweek)!
What
we are speaking of here, of engineering the consent of the masses to
get them to love their own servitude, far transcends the corporate
advertising and marketing techniques taught in MBA programs which
were principally pioneered by Edward Bernays. These techniques of
course also attempt to bypass the cognitive mind and target
manipulating the subconscious mind directly to sell a product, a
lifestyle, or an idea.
However,
while most recognize that advertising is a multi-billion dollar
business and accept it as a matter of for-profit corporate modernity,
few are aware of an order of magnitude more resources being
perversely spent by tax-exempt foundations, and the tax-payers (quite
unbeknownst to themselves of course), on far more diabolical aspects
of social engineering for “getting
people to consent to what is happening to them. Well, it seems to
me that the nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now
faced is precisely this: that we are in process of developing a whole
series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who
have always existed and presumably always will exist, to get
people actually to love their servitude!” (please once
again refer to Aldous Huxley quoted at the very beginning to refresh
your memory that I haven't made all this up)
Advertising
Age’s 2008
Marketer of the Year award
to President Obama for his election campaign of the “Change”
mantra, and the Nobel committee's awarding him the 2009
Nobel Peace Prize
testify to the empiricism of this observation. The American nation
easily bought that fiction of “Change”,
which was once again underscored by President Obama bombing
Libya
on the same day in 2011 that his predecessor bombed Iraq in 2003!
How
did the American public buy that fiction? Once again, please refer
back to the very beginning of this report and to Edward Bernays: “We
are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas
suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”
This
ignorance and gullibility among the college-educated modern public is
despite the fact that Western academe is at the forefront of the vast
majority of behavior control and social engineering research studies,
often funded by, or in collaboration with, Western intelligence,
military, and private tax-exempt foundations such as the Rockefeller
Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, and Ford Foundation. The highly
compartmentalized nature of such research ensures that few students
and professors in on the ground breaking studies into human behavior
can ever glean the bigger picture towards which they work so
diligently to respectively earn their Ph.D. and research funding!
Those few who do comprehend are invariably engaged with empire in the
largely unhidden orchestration of social engineering. Or, are quickly
recruited as agents and assets of the Mighty Wurlitzer.
Mighty
Wurlitzer has no limit for its territory. The newsmedia,
entertainment, academe, political parties, religious institutions,
think-tanks, private foundations, government-funded organizations,
and non-governmental organization (NGOs) alike, all house its agents
and assets. And they each play their own tunes on their own
specialized instruments under the supreme conduction of the Mighty
Wurlitzer. The most notable among these is religion. Although the
layman does not normally associate the pastor, rabbi, alim, mullah,
swami, etc., with propaganda organs of state, but religion is in fact
the most affected by the Mighty Wurlitzer – all throughout
history. If we just reflect on the fact that more than three quarters
of the world's people espouse some faith, the easiest cognitive
infiltration and behavior control is
directly through faith. The report: Islam
and Knowledge vs. Socialization
( http://tinyurl.com/Islam-Socialization
), and the following challenge to a pious Muslim cleric who issued a
600-page
Fatwa
on Terrorism
in the Service of Empire
( http://tinyurl.com/Fatwa-Terrorism-Qadri
), indubitably illustrate this universal fact.
Today,
fact and fiction have been merged to such an alarming degree with
adept perception control that to be able to rationally separate them,
to tell what is mere imagery of the Mighty Wurlitzer vs. the actual
interconnected causal reality (cause and effect) of statecraft, can
be as uncongenial to the cognitive mind as depicted by Plato for the
prisoners bred in the underground cave since birth. The fact that the
most brilliant minds remain unable to tell that 9/11 was an
'Operation Canned Goods' even ten years into its vile enactment while
America descends into a police-state in presumed reaction to it,
demonstrates that it is not the brain hardware which is
malfunctioning, but the brain software!
Watch the
documentary The
Century of the Self to see how the brain software has
been subliminally infiltrated with pernicious perception management
malware to ensure full controllability by
external agents.
-- ### --
What can
make 'Sept. 11 pale by comparison' By Zahir Ebrahim | Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org