Zahir Ebrahim, Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
Dateline California, September 15, 2009
Continuing with the perplexing theme left off in my October 2008 Open Letter to Hon. Ron Paul Supporters, incorporated here by reference (as are the relevant portions analyzing Ron Paul speak in the May 2009 DIGEST Financial and State Terrorism), it drives me up the wall no end that Dr. Ron Paul says all the right and most rational things, well almost, and I end up supporting this courageous gentleman, well almost.
And then he dutifully reminds me, as if he really does not care for my support (and that's worth a lot, at least to me if not to anyone else), that he too cleverly retains the primal axioms of empire amidst all the egregious dissent-speak! The same core axioms whose effects he critiques so passionately, but leaves the first-cause unanalyzed, untouched, and largely a parroting of the Pentagon, the White House, and the Elite. The same Elite whom Dr. Ron Paul comprehends better than most!
What is that you ask? Well please observe this amazingly candid interview with John Stossel of ABC News, at 07:52 minutes:
“John Stossel: Homeland Security, isn't that the role for federal government?
Ron Paul: Not really, not the way that's designed. That's the biggest bureaucracy of them all. [...] No, homeland security, how has it been taken care of for all these years? Pretty well. I think it was a failure of government on 911, not the fact that we didn't have department of homeland security, and we didn't have a national ID card, and we didn't have this constant surveillance and loss of our privacy,
John Stossel: Failure of government, how?
Ron Paul: We spent 40 billion dollars on intelligence gathering, and didn't prevent it from happening. But the government was in charge of airlines. FAA, they were supposed to inspect the people as they went on, and you weren't supposed to resist any hostages takeovers, and they weren't allowed to have a gun. May be if you and I head the airlines, we might have said hey, you know, we want to pat-check our passengers, may be we should have stronger door on our air, may be we ought to give our pilots a gun. Then it wouldn't have happened. 911 wouldn't have happened.
John Stossel: So the government creates the wrong rules. Too many rules, and the wrong ones?
Ron Paul: That's basically it. Most of the time well intentioned, but good intentions will not solve our problems.”
Dr. Ron Paul retains the sacred-cow axiom that it was an invasion from abroad, and the government inadvertently fell victim to their own good-intentioned but ill-conceived laws, and its poor execution. The inadvertence-incompetence theory of 911.
Is my otherwise inspiring leader super na├»ve of Machiavellian state-craft after spending decades in Congress, or am I simply super-brilliant to understand the elite's diabolical orchestration of a pretext for “imperial mobilization” far better without ever having set foot into the hallowed halls of governance and legislature? Of all the current-affairs books Ron Paul has paraded from many a podium while lecturing others on their lack of eruditeness, to my knowledge he hasn't yet shown Zbigniew Brzezinski's, nor the PNAC document calling for a “new pearl harbor”, and nor Machiavelli's “the Prince”.
But Dr. Ron Paul does acutely perceive the immense power of the Elite to make things happen diabolically, as the case of orchestrating the Federal Reserve a hundred years ago. Watch this amazing 1988 interview of Ron Paul in which he betrays his profound understanding of both history, and real state-craft.
Where is that brilliant acumen and amazing courage hiding since 911?
Please see the earlier cited documents which are incorporated here by reference to appreciate the depth of Dr. Ron Paul's support of imperial axioms. It is incredibly bizarre that no one seems to notice these palpable anomalies except this scribe.
When it was obvious to Dan Rather of CBS within minutes of the WTC towers collapsing into their own footprints that it looked like controlled demolition, years later, and despite all the scientific-forensic evidence emerging showing explosive particulate in the ground-zero debris, Hon. Ron Paul insists that some super enemy's hijacking of airliners took the United States by surprise despite its 40 billion dollar intelligence budget (not to mention the half a trillion dollar a year defense spending), and that these turbanless antediluvians controlled from a cave in the Hindu Kush by a fanatically militant yogi are entirely responsible for 911. A surprise invasion from abroad. Al Qaeeda. Bin Laden. The Islamic radicals. “Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day”. That's what the Pentagon says, that's what the White House says, that's what President George Bush said for 8 years, and that's exactly what President Obama says.
Watch President Obama reiterate who the enemy is, warning not to question the official sacred axiom of 911, cleverly lumping “questioning” with “justifying”.
“I am aware that there is still some who would question, or even justify the offense of 911.
But let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day.
The victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.
And yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries, to try to expand their reach.
These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.”
And Hon. Ron Paul obeys. He doesn't!
And here for the sudden free-fall symmetrical collapse of WTC 7 that same day at which Dan Rather of CBS spontaneously exclaimed on air: “... amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we have all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down,” and which the BBC, in surely what must be the most surreal moment in live news reporting history, announced many minutes before it even happened!
“These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.”!!
The day Dr. Ron Paul will say “911 was an inside job”, a coup d'etat from within the intelligence-military apparatus to initiate “imperial mobilization” enroute to one-world government by ultimately collapsing the United States into a NAU – the NAU of course he is an ardent critic of quite independent of the issue of 911 – would be the day when it would be too late!
The responsibility, and thus the accountability, for cementing the fait accompli of 911 which became the prime-mover of all the long-planned transformations – the now visible effects which Ron Paul does talk about – rests entirely on the timely silence of prominent peoples. And that includes veteran statesman, fearless leader of many, Hon. Ron Paul.
They all said all the right things, except the most important one that could have impeded, nay halted, nay outright prevented, “imperial mobilization”.
No one in power is willing to tell the truth which matters, when it matters!
Later, all will write lauded books narrating history that is too late to reverse. Like the common ubiquitous narration, even in junior-high text books, of the smallpox laden blankets handed to native Americans to wipe them out from their own lands. That germ-warfare upon an unsuspecting civilian population is the precedent for the present Swine Flue pandemic – and where is Ron Paul? Where's the brilliant insight of American history to unravel current affairs?
Is this an incredibly sophisticated manufactured dissent, or merely jitters of JFK-syndrome? One's own life is of course always precious to one – others' be damned beyond lip-service!
Regardless of motivation, the ultimate effect of prominent statesmen focussing on the wrong cause is no less sophisticated in diabolically accomplishing the “end run around national sovereignty” amidst the “great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’”, than all the awesome powers of the magical flying carpet attributed by the Mighty Wurlitzer to that perpetually illusive nemesis of mankind, Ali Baba. Both Ali Baba and Dr. Ron Paul, along with the oligarchic elite and their 'errand boys', end up achieving the same aims regardless of their respective divergent utterances. Are they all on the same WWF wrestling?
The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org. Verbatim reproduction license at http://www.humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright.
My beef with the stellar congressman Hon. Ron Paul by Zahir Ebrahim September 15, 2009