Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
  • Steve Schear
    ... David, One simple way would be to implement a search warrant circumvention process. I ve recommended this for libraries but there s no reason it wouldn t
    Oct 31, 2002 1 of 8
    View Source
    At 10:17 AM 10/30/2002 -0800, you wrote:
    >I'd like to understand how we could be useful to the cypherpunk community.
    >I've got some wild guesses (run a public keyserver, run a mixmaster node,
    >etc), but I don't really know what is most badly needed, or how we could
    >provide the most bang for the bandwidth buck. (We do pay for bandwidth, so
    >"serving up Debian ISOs" is not a viable way we can help the community at
    >this time.) Ideally, we'd like to find applications that don't use a lot of
    >bandwidth (<500kbps aggregate), but require a server that's got a fixed IP,
    >is up all the time, and has very low latency to most of the Net.
    >
    >How can we help?

    David,

    One simple way would be to implement a search warrant circumvention
    process. I've recommended this for libraries but there's no reason it
    wouldn't work for an ISP. After reviewing Federal procedures for subpoena
    I have uncovered a loophole that may not only allow ISPs to provide the
    privacy protection patrons desire but perhaps create a new profit center.

    The efficacy of my approach is based on the presumption that it is lawful
    for the ISP to answer questions from patrons who are not the subject of a
    search warrant or other law enforcement investigation. So, for example, if
    I were to contact you or your staff and request that you tell me if I my
    account records had been requested by law enforcement your staff would be
    under no legal restraint from complying with the request (unless I was, in
    fact, the subject of such an investigation). Should a request be received
    from a patron who was the target of such an investigation, the ISP would
    simply fail to respond. My understanding is that the courts cannot order
    an ISP to act affirmatively and provide a patron with incorrect information
    (i.e., they cannot deputize you and force you to lie to the patron).

    Using this approach patrons can now discover from the ISP whether they are
    the target of any investigation without the ISP taking any affirmative
    action, without the ISP running afoul of the USA Patriot Act or other court
    issued subpoenas. To offset the costs of such activity the ISP could
    impose a small fee against the patron's account for each check of their
    records.

    Implementing such a system will, of course, require a ISP which is prepared
    to place a high enough value of their patron's assumed right of privacy to
    undertake conduct which may be unpopular to law enforcement. Your offer to
    help out in a cypherpunk fashion indicates to me you're that sort of person.

    steve
  • Morlock Elloi
    I see an open search engine as the most important server project. Limit the engine to cpunkish issues and similar to control the popularity (bandwidth). Run
    Oct 31, 2002 2 of 8
    View Source
    I see an open search engine as the most important server project. Limit the
    engine to cpunkish issues and similar to control the popularity (bandwidth).
    Run your own harvesters/spiders. This would help limit the google monopoly and
    power and provide a search engine of choice for the (gasp) "community".

    The question is, how does one construct a censorship-free search engine.



    =====
    end
    (of original message)

    Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows:
    HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
    http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
  • Jim Choate
    ... Plan 9 http://plan9.bell-labs.com Hangar 18 http://open-forge.org -- ____________________________________________________________________ We don t see
    Nov 1 7:13 AM 3 of 8
    View Source
    On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Morlock Elloi wrote:

    > I see an open search engine as the most important server project. Limit the
    > engine to cpunkish issues and similar to control the popularity (bandwidth).
    > Run your own harvesters/spiders. This would help limit the google monopoly and
    > power and provide a search engine of choice for the (gasp) "community".
    >
    > The question is, how does one construct a censorship-free search engine.

    Plan 9

    http://plan9.bell-labs.com

    Hangar 18

    http://open-forge.org


    --
    ____________________________________________________________________

    We don't see things as they are, ravage@...
    we see them as we are. www.ssz.com
    jchoate@...
    Anais Nin www.open-forge.org

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Jim Choate
    Nin hao, ... Hangar 18 http://open-forge.org (Join the hangar18-general list for direct participation) The sponsoring company In Silica, LLC should go live
    Nov 1 7:27 AM 4 of 8
    View Source
    Nin hao,

    On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, David E. Weekly wrote:

    > Cypherpunks,
    >
    > I run a 501(c)(3) non-profit focuses on providing free, donation-based
    > colocation to individuals and other non-profits (i.e., no companies are
    > hosted. Additionally, we try to do things that are useful to the
    > not-for-profit Internet community as a whole; for instance, we run a
    > freenode.info IRC server (freenode is used by a lot of Open Source
    > development groups to coordinate developer teams).
    >
    > I'd like to understand how we could be useful to the cypherpunk community.
    > I've got some wild guesses (run a public keyserver, run a mixmaster node,
    > etc), but I don't really know what is most badly needed, or how we could
    > provide the most bang for the bandwidth buck. (We do pay for bandwidth, so
    > "serving up Debian ISOs" is not a viable way we can help the community at
    > this time.) Ideally, we'd like to find applications that don't use a lot of
    > bandwidth (<500kbps aggregate), but require a server that's got a fixed IP,
    > is up all the time, and has very low latency to most of the Net.
    >
    > How can we help?

    Hangar 18

    http://open-forge.org

    (Join the hangar18-general list for direct participation)

    The sponsoring company In Silica, LLC should go live within the next
    several days (I believe the papers get submitted to the state this
    afternon around 2pm). It will operate via a DBA for "Open Forge" to
    support Open Technology public distributed networks (among other Open
    Technology projects, like a P2P laser comm we're building).

    With respect to Mixmaster, Wolf is already set to begin porting to Plan 9
    as soon as we get the first clusters up (by Jan 1 is our current target).
    We are building machines now. All in all we've got about a half dozen
    volunteers and approximately 40 machines. It is a mix of Linux, Plan 9, &
    BSD. We have one Plan 9 R3 I/O-Auth server installed but not configured
    (these 16/6 weeks at work are killing my project time). We have another
    Plan 9 R4 I/O-Auth server being built. At least two members of Hangar 18
    are building boxes to add. I believe both of these will be process servers
    for the general pool. A core 80G 9P file server will be coming online
    also, limited usage and content type (eg no music swapping/sharing). We
    also have a node in NYC (though it's a little light right now on services
    - Hi Carlos!).

    Zai jian.


    --
    ____________________________________________________________________

    We don't see things as they are, ravage@...
    we see them as we are. www.ssz.com
    jchoate@...
    Anais Nin www.open-forge.org

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Jamie Lawrence
    On Fri, 01 Nov 2002, Jim Choate wrote: Nei sche szche. ... An OS is not a search engine. ... A service might be a search engine. Give plan9 a rest, already.
    Nov 1 8:29 AM 5 of 8
    View Source
    On Fri, 01 Nov 2002, Jim Choate wrote:


    Nei sche szche.

    > > The question is, how does one construct a censorship-free search engine.
    >
    > Plan 9
    >
    > http://plan9.bell-labs.com

    An OS is not a search engine.

    > Hangar 18
    >
    > http://open-forge.org

    A service might be a search engine.

    Give plan9 a rest, already. Everyone loves the OS they use.

    (Sorry to respond to Jim, but I'm grumpy this morning.
    Something about coding until 7AM does that to me...)

    -j


    --
    Jamie Lawrence jal@...
    "Naturally the common people don't want war . But after all,
    it is the leaders of a country who determine policy, and it
    is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether
    it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship. All you have
    to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the
    pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to
    danger. It works the same in any country."
    -Hermann Goering
  • Jim Choate
    Your ignornace of technology is showing. You should do more research into 9P. -- ____________________________________________________________________ We don t
    Nov 1 12:37 PM 6 of 8
    View Source
    Your ignornace of technology is showing.

    You should do more research into 9P.


    --
    ____________________________________________________________________

    We don't see things as they are, ravage@...
    we see them as we are. www.ssz.com
    jchoate@...
    Anais Nin www.open-forge.org

    --------------------------------------------------------------------

    On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Jamie Lawrence wrote:

    > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002, Jim Choate wrote:
    >
    >
    > Nei sche szche.
    >
    > > > The question is, how does one construct a censorship-free search engine.
    > >
    > > Plan 9
    > >
    > > http://plan9.bell-labs.com
    >
    > An OS is not a search engine.
    >
    > > Hangar 18
    > >
    > > http://open-forge.org
    >
    > A service might be a search engine.
    >
    > Give plan9 a rest, already. Everyone loves the OS they use.
    >
    > (Sorry to respond to Jim, but I'm grumpy this morning.
    > Something about coding until 7AM does that to me...)
    >
    > -j
    >
    >
    > --
    > Jamie Lawrence jal@...
    > "Naturally the common people don't want war . But after all,
    > it is the leaders of a country who determine policy, and it
    > is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether
    > it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship. All you have
    > to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the
    > pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to
    > danger. It works the same in any country."
    > -Hermann Goering
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
  • Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
OK
Cancel