Home  >  WOT  >  Report: NHTSA Looking to Standardize Early Warning Crash, Lane Departure Systems

Report: NHTSA Looking to Standardize Early Warning Crash, Lane Departure Systems

By |   |  
An early warning forward collision system and lane departure radar may be legally required as standard road vehicle equipment by the National Highway Traffic Institute Administration (NHTSA), The Detroit News reports. Much like recently required side-impact airbags and longstanding seatbelt regulations, the two technologies are currently being considered as standard safety equipment by lawmakers and automotive officials alike. Many analysts say the systems have the potential to significantly reduce the 2.3 million frontal collisions and 483,000 lane departure crashes that occur on average every year. The NHTSA already has crash tests aimed at analyzing the pair of technologies in a controlled environment. For the uninitiated, early warning forward collision systems use radar to detect and alert drivers of upcoming vehicles or objects in front of a vehicle's path. Upon detection of an imminent collision, many systems -- like Mercedes-Benz's Pre-Safe -- also apply the brakes and tighten seatbelts for added safety. Lane departure systems also use radar to alert drivers when veering out of a designated lane. Many units are set up to gently steer a vehicle back on course. One main concern of both NHTSA and automotive executives is the cost the systems would add to a vehicle's MSRP. Both systems are currently offered in many luxury vehicles. Whether or not the cost-to-benefit ratio ultimately works out has yet to be determined. But a full report and conclusion as to their approval as standard safety features are expected in 2011. Do you think an early warning frontal collision and lane departure systems should be standard equipment? Source: The Detroit News
6 comments
fordfan4life
fordfan4life

no as too much money and weight and they are pointless making driving computerized!

dfschim
dfschim

These are different than the other safety equipment. They only help inattentive drivers and the people hit by inattentive drivers. I doubt they will pass the costs benefits analysis. How about requiring them for every car over $30K MSRP.

esommers23
esommers23

I don't have a problem with them making it required as long as they give the automakers time for the trickle down effect. 5 years maybe? So if the full report and conclusion comes out in 2011, make it standard on 2016 models?

klotus93
klotus93

they should require it ASAP too many morons are on the road these days

mitsuman14
mitsuman14

i dont think this is so important that it needs to be mandated right away. let the technology trickle down like every other safety system and when it finally reaches the lowest models then go ahead and require it. until then it's just going to be too expensive.

  MotorTrend on Instagram