Perth & Kinross

The ‘Nos’ have it at Perth & Kinross Youth Council’s independence question time

By Kirsty Topping, 21 November 2013 2.57pm.

More than half the Perth and Kinross pupils who took part in a special debate on Scottish independence said the country should remain part of the UK.

The Young Person’s Question Time held at the North Inch Community Campus in Perth on Wednesday allowed S4-6 students from across the region to discuss questions arising from the Scottish referendum in 2014.

Hundreds of teenagers attended the event, which featured questions as diverse as whether the monarch would remain relevant in an independent Scotland, to what industries would support the independent economy.

Calum Wilson, a member of the Scottish Youth Parliament at St John’s Academy, asked whether an independent Scotland would have a stronger voice in an in/out referendum on EU membership than it would as part of the UK.

The majority agreed with the Yes campaign’s position that, as Scotland’s voters are outnumbered 11 to one, their voice would be stronger in an independent country.

The pupils were asked at the start and end of the session whether they thought Scotland should separate from the UK, with 51% saying they would like to remain part of Great Britain.

In the first round of voting, just 18% said they would like to see Scotland split from the rest of the UK, while 31% remained undecided. By the end of the session, that had swung to 46% being in favour of independence, while just 4% remained on the fence.

The number opposing independence remained at 51%.

Asked whether they would vote for Devo-Max, were they given the option, 53% said yes, while 40% said no, and 7% were not sure.

Pupils were also encouraged to engage in social media during the event, using the hashtag #YPQT on Twitter.

The event, thought to be the first of its kind in Scotland, was chaired by Courier deputy editor and former political editor Steve Bargeton.

The panel of four answering the questions were Councillor Dave Doogan, for the Yes Scotland campaign; Michaela Drummond, of the Better Together campaign; chief executive of Young Scot, Louise MacDonald; and Rory MacLeod, the director of the Community Learning Development Standards Council.

Spartacus 909 2 days ago
This follows a trend. Just like in the recent debate at Abertay University, the poll taken at the beginning showed a large number against independence with many 'don't knows'. Once exposed to balance discussion and fears addressed, a majority said they would vote 'YES'. It can be assumed that many of the attendees here may have been poorly informed as to what a Yes vote could actually bring to Scotland and to themselves as young Scots. Maybe a lot of them were taken in by the daily scare stories churned out by Project Fear. Debate is good for the Yes camp and bad for the unionists. Lets have more debate.
L. robertson 3 days ago
How these pupils could support independence when a future Scotland would have less say over the economy than Holywoid presently does is a mystery,
max 3 days ago
Yes you are spot on, Holywoid would have no say on economic matters in an independent Scotland. Holyrood on the other hand would.
Griff 2 days ago
Oh dear, picking up typos to make your argument (??). Never a good idea. Any chance you concentrate on the OP's point and set out why it is you think HOLYROOD would get more powers, when that isn't going to happen ?
Griff 2 days ago
I should also like to point out that the OP also doesn't say "have no say", he/she says "have less say". Note the difference ?
Pragmatic 2 days ago
I'd also like you to answer my response below Griff, or would you rather get into a slanging match with other posters?
Pragmatist 2 days ago
Holyrood would have the power to tax and spend in Scotlands favour. Holyrood would have the power to spend money on the defences we need, not the offensive capabilities we project at present. There's a couple of reasons. Care to explain why we would have less powers in those areas? And before you type misleading rubbish, the rUK will be in the EU as well.
Rory 2 days ago
Do these offensive offensive capabilities include the "unpardonable folly" of NATO's attempt to prevent the helpless Albanians of Kosovo being delivered up to the tender mercies of Milosovic?
Pragmatic 2 days ago
And what part of that effort was offensive Rory? Offensive means(!) to attack someone or something. Can you think of any country that Scotland would wish to attack?
Max 3 days ago
That indicates as other debates have shown that the undecideds are overwhelmingly persuaded by the arguments for independence.
Athena 3 days ago
Also indicates headline is misleading.
Guest 3 days ago
Where did you learn to count?
Athena 2 days ago
Have you heard of variables?
Rory 2 days ago
... which is exactly why 16 & 17 year olds have been included in the vote. It also shows a country being split down the middle; riven in two; divided. Settled will - I think not. Ironic from those who accused Margaret Thatcher of being divisive that division is exactly what they seek and hope for.