Text

"One of the few things I know about writing is this: spend it all, shoot it, play it, lose it, all, right away, every time. Do not hoard what seems good for a later place in the book, or for another book; give it, give it all, give it now. The impulse to save something good for a better place later is the signal to spend it now. Something more will arise for later, something better. These things fill from behind, from beneath, like well water. Similarly, the impulse to keep to yourself what you have learned is not only shameful, it is destructive. Anything you do not give freely and abundantly becomes lost to you. You open your safe and find ashes." 

— from The Writing Life by Annie Dillard

Video

Tune in to my story for PRI’s The World about a young privileged man from Islamabad has decided to start a school for the children of low-income families as a way to break down the economic divide in the country. It’s a nonprofit school in the slum. But it could change society for the better. It was produced with support form the Pulitzer Center on Crises Reporting.

Photo
I have never heard of this word before. 

I have never heard of this word before. 

Text

"That’s what art is, he said, the story of a life in all its particularity. It’s the only thing that really is particular and personal. It’s the expression and, at the same time, the fabric of the particular. And what do you mean by the fabric of the particular? I asked, supposing he would answer: Art. I was also thinking, indulgently, that we were pretty drunk already and that it was time to go home. But my friend said: What I mean is the secret story…. The secret story is the one we’ll never know, although we’re living it from day to day, thinking we’re alive, thinking we’ve got it all under control and the stuff we overlook doesn’t matter. But every damn thing matters! It’s just that we don’t realize. We tell ourselves that art runs on one track and life, our lives, on another, we don’t even realize that’s a lie."

— from “The Dentist” by Roberto Bolaño

Link

Some personal favorites from Teju Cole’s New ‘Dictionary of Received Ideas’:

ARTISAN. A carpenter, in Brooklyn.

COMMUNITY. Preceded by “black.” White people, lacking community, must make do with property.

DIVERSITY. Obviously desirable, within limits. Mention your service in the Peace Corps.

EMIGRÉ. Jewish immigrant.

HIPSTER. One who has an irrational hatred of hipsters.

ILIAD. Declare a preference for the Odyssey.

MIGRANT. Mexican immigrant.

PARIS. Romantic, in spite of the rude waiters and Japanese tourists. Don’t simply like it; “adore” it.

PROUST. No one actually reads him. You reread him, preferably on summer vacation.

SEMINAL. Be sure to use in a review of a woman’s work. Proclaim your innocence after.

Quote
"It is not worth while to be concerned what he says or thinks, who says or thinks only as he is directed by another."

John Locke, born on August 28, 1632, on public opinion and the labors of true of understanding. (via explore-blog)

Quote
"

nobody can save you but
yourself.
you will be put again and again
into nearly impossible
situations.
they will attempt again and again
through subterfuge, guise and
force
to make you submit, quit and/or die quietly
inside.

nobody can save you but
yourself
and it will be easy enough to fail
so very easily
but don’t, don’t, don’t.
just watch them.
listen to them.
do you want to be like that?
a faceless, mindless, heartless
being?
do you want to experience
death before death?

nobody can save you but
yourself
and you’re worth saving.
it’s a war not easily won
but if anything is worth winning then
this is it.

think about it.
think about saving your self.

"

— Charles Bukowski, “Nobody But You”

(Source: larmoyante, via noukadubi)

Photo
noukadubi:

Dancers rehearsing
Ahmedabad, India
1986
Martine Franck

noukadubi:

Dancers rehearsing

Ahmedabad, India

1986

Martine Franck

Photo
divaneee:

A MEMLOOK BEY, EGYPT (1868)

divaneee:

A MEMLOOK BEY, EGYPT (1868)

(via sufiness)

Link

I’ve been struggling to make a decision on whether to go back to Pakistan. I wrote a little about my feelings about working there as a freelance journalist for Medium. Here’s an excerpt:

"I was supposed to fly back to Pakistan this week. To climb down the stairs off the plane and into night air heavy with diesel exhaust and so much else — rotting mango peels, kabobs frying in their own fat, little white jasmine buds strung into a necklace and sold by a street kid for spare change. I was due to settle into that cacophony of smells, the chaos of afternoon traffic, the kisses from doting aunts and call it all home. Again. Except, I never got on that plane. I just couldn’t bear to go back."

Link

Alas, the King whom we remember only as civil-rights leader at the 1963 march ended up dying as a labor leader in a 1968 garbage strike.”

Photo
This is the first linoleum block print I’ve made since elementary school. Of course, it’s a bee.

This is the first linoleum block print I’ve made since elementary school. Of course, it’s a bee.

Link

Edwidge Danticat, author of Claire of the Sea Light, writes of her favorite passage in literature where a woman recounts what her father told her after she said she wanted to pursue something creative: “… he shook his head as if I’d been terribly mistaken and said there was no need for that; I was already an artist by blood; all immigrants are artists because they create a life, a future, from nothing but a dream.” The passage is from Patricia Engel’s Its Not Love. Here’s Danticat in the Atlantic on what it means to her:

My parents spent their entire lives in Haiti before they left. They didn’t know much about the United States except that, at that time, there were opportunities there. They basically packed two suitcases and came. That experience of touching down in a totally foreign place is like having a blank canvas: You begin with nothing, but stroke by stroke you build a life. This process requires everything great art requires—risk-tasking, hope, a great deal of imagination, all the qualities that are the building blocks of art. You must be able to dream something nearly impossible and toil to bring it into existence.

As in art, there are always surprises. For my parents, one thing was snow. Cold. They’d never had to worry about being cold before! It took creativity to know how to cope with it. My mother, because of a rule in her religion, wasn’t allowed to wear pants. Other women told her that pants would help quite a bit with the cold, but she knew she had to find another way. In the end, she learned to sew these legwarmer-like things for herself, which she wore under her dresses to stay warm.

Alice Walker has a wonderful essay called “In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens,” where she talks about women who were slaves and dying, perhaps, to paint or write. Because they couldn’t, they channeled their creativity into domestic forms of art—into their quilts, say, or gardens. I see this impulse in my mother. She could have been an extraordinary designer in another place, in another situation—she was an excellent seamstress. When we’d walk through a clothing store together, I’d pick out a dress—she’d always touch the fabric and say, “This is such cheap quality.” And she’d tell me, “I’m going to make you this dress—but better.” So we’d go to the cloth shop, buy some fabric, and she’d make me a beautiful replica of the dress. 

When I was little, I bought her reasoning: It was the quality of the cloth, she wanted better for me. And it might have been. But when I got older, I realized it was just cheaper for her to make my clothes. My mother made most of the clothes I wore through high school. Until I had my own money, we didn’t buy dresses. Sometimes it was weird—I wore more dresses than other things. But these are ways people find to survive. If you can’t afford clothes, but you can make them—make them. You have to work with what you have, especially if you don’t have a lot of money. You use creativity, and you use imagination.

that first-generation immigrants often model artistic behavior for their children. They don’t necessarily realize it, like the father who says the immigrant life is art in its greatest form. But I realize now I saw artistic qualities in my parents’ choices—in their creativity, their steadfastness, the very fact that we were in this country from another place. They’re like the artist mentors people have in any discipline—by studying, by observing, by reading, you’ve had this model in the form of someone’s life. My mother could not have found time for creative pursuits with four children and a factory job. But she modeled the discipline and resourcefulness and self-sacrifice that are constant inspirations in my own life’s work. The things she did, the choices she made, made the artist’s life possible for me. I didn’t know it, but she taught me that being an artist makes sense.

Link

I don’t know about “defending” Ms. Cyrus, but this piece makes some interesting points about what to make of the little twerker and her critics: 

Sure, there’s nothing remotely “authentic” about her performance. But the spectacle of Miley twerking isn’t any more or less authentic than, say, Drake’s “Started From the Bottom,” which was also performed at the same ceremony — unless, of course, you consider “the bottom” to be growing up in a nice Toronto neighborhood and being on Degrassi. The portrayal of an image that doesn’t reflect reality is, again, as old as hip-hop itself — Biggie probably never really fussed when the landlord dissed him, but no-one holds that against “Juicy.”

[…] 

None of this, of course, is to say that Cyrus’s performance was actuallygood. (As [Maurice] McLeod observed succinctly, “The other problem [with Cyrus twerking] is that I’m afraid she just isn’t very good at it.”) But that’s all it was — rather silly and not particularly accomplished. It wasn’t a racist minstrel show or the spectacle of a deeply disturbed anorexic or the harbinger of America’s moral decline — it was a gangly 20-year-old making a fool of herself with some silly dance moves. But then, shit, we’re talking about an award ceremony wherein Bruno Mars performed the godawful “Gorilla” — sample lyrics “You just smile and tell me, ‘Daddy, it’s yours’… You’re a dirty little lover” — and the same critics who execrated Cyrus dubbed his performance “a solid artistic statement.” Why isn’t anyone talking about that?

Photo
explore-blog:


If writers agree on anything — which is unlikely — it’s that nothing can damage a novel in embryo as quickly and effectively as trying to describe it before it’s ready. Unfortunately, because we’re writers, a k a bipedal nests of contradictions, avoiding the temptation to share is never as easy as simply keeping our mouths shut.
Why? Because we’re unsure — about very nearly everything. Because in our hearts we’re only as good as our last paragraph, and if the new book isn’t going anywhere, maybe we’re no good at all. Because we’re running on faith and fumes. In the early stages, before that magic moment when the voice of the story begins to speak, we want — no, crave — validation, someone on the outside who will say, preferably with godlike authority and timbre: “It’s brilliant. You’re on the right track. Just keep going.” 
The problem, of course, is that our inner critic, the I. C., is whispering in our ear that we’re not even remotely on the right track — that we’re blundering around in the wilderness, in fact. Yet we still try to bully him into submission by recruiting allies from among our friends. If they confirm that yes, indeed, that first page of “The Something or Other” is immortal and they’d rather open a vein than be denied the knowledge of what happens next, maybe I. C. will shut up. It rarely works. Nine times out of 10 (the exception guarantees a bad book) the I. C. will be rubbing our nose in the truth before the week is out: the work is as bad as we suspected it was. And the loyal recruit, having foolishly interfered in this lost cause, will be collateral damage. 

NYT’s Mark Slouka on why you should never ask a writer what she’s writing, with stunning illustration by Roman Muradov.
The better question is always why a writer is writing – here are some poignant answers from Michael Lewis, Joan Didion, George Orwell, Mary Karr, Isabel Allende, Charles Bukowski, David Foster Wallace, Italo Calvino, and Joy Williams.

explore-blog:

If writers agree on anything — which is unlikely — it’s that nothing can damage a novel in embryo as quickly and effectively as trying to describe it before it’s ready. Unfortunately, because we’re writers, a k a bipedal nests of contradictions, avoiding the temptation to share is never as easy as simply keeping our mouths shut.

Why? Because we’re unsure — about very nearly everything. Because in our hearts we’re only as good as our last paragraph, and if the new book isn’t going anywhere, maybe we’re no good at all. Because we’re running on faith and fumes. In the early stages, before that magic moment when the voice of the story begins to speak, we want — no, crave — validation, someone on the outside who will say, preferably with godlike authority and timbre: “It’s brilliant. You’re on the right track. Just keep going.”

The problem, of course, is that our inner critic, the I. C., is whispering in our ear that we’re not even remotely on the right track — that we’re blundering around in the wilderness, in fact. Yet we still try to bully him into submission by recruiting allies from among our friends. If they confirm that yes, indeed, that first page of “The Something or Other” is immortal and they’d rather open a vein than be denied the knowledge of what happens next, maybe I. C. will shut up. It rarely works. Nine times out of 10 (the exception guarantees a bad book) the I. C. will be rubbing our nose in the truth before the week is out: the work is as bad as we suspected it was. And the loyal recruit, having foolishly interfered in this lost cause, will be collateral damage. 

NYT’s Mark Slouka on why you should never ask a writer what she’s writing, with stunning illustration by Roman Muradov.

The better question is always why a writer is writing – here are some poignant answers from Michael Lewis, Joan Didion, George Orwell, Mary Karr, Isabel Allende, Charles Bukowski, David Foster Wallace, Italo Calvino, and Joy Williams.