The fact of the matter is, all this effort to discredit me is because my Facebook page displays proof of his immoral livelihood. David Brotsky runs numerous pages on Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn and a dozen accounts on Twitter. Except for 3 that run news, they all serve one purpose: Seeking Donations to “Support Israel” and help “Fight Terrorism”. My problem with David Brotsky is he pockets that money for self gratification.

You sure love using the word “homoSEXual”, don’t you?

The
article is pre-faced with the fraudulent map of “Palestine”
supposedly showing how the “Palestinians” lost “their”
land. The map is showing as “Jewish” land only the parts privately
owned by the Jews. Arabs owned even less. The rest was state land, an Arabs
(a.k.a “Palestinians”) never lost it as they never owned it. But
facts does not matter to the antisemitic (a.k.a anti-Zionist) crowd, the map
serves to prove Goebbels right that if you repeat a lie enough times most
people will consider it a fact.

In his article Brooks Bayne uses personal attacks to try and
defend the violent behavior by the anti-Israeli crowd at some rally in Oakland.
Brooks Bayne only proves that he/she does not understand that ad hominem is a
logical fallacy.

From
the video it is clear that the young woman, Hannah, was attacked by the
anti-Israeli crowd for writing “People of Israel Live”. It is also
clear that the attack happened in a public square, where freedom of speech is
protected by our Constitution.

The anti-Israel crowd prevented Hannah from her exercising her
right to free speech, and from her right to assemble in a public square. It is
doubly ironic that anti-Israelis had a sign promoting exactly freedom of speech
and assembly. Apparently freedom of speech and assembly is only allowed if for persons
agrees with their views…

Well, this is how “democracy” functions in under Hamas, and all
other Muslim rulers..e So perhaps it is only natural.

It relevant if the cameraman has, or has not, committed fraud in
some. It also does not matter whether Mr. Wencel knew the Hannah and her
father. What matters is if the video is accurate and if any material evidence
has been removed. The only justification for physical violence against this
Hannah would have been self-defense. Since nobody claims that Hannah assaulted Gabby Silverman, the video
should be considered as a fair documentary.

Brooks
Bayne tries to justify Gabby Silverman bad behavior by her personal trauma. I
can sympathize with her emotional wounds, but they are no excuse for violence
against another person. Her calling Hannah a “whole” ugly, and her apology to
the whores was even uglier.

Brooks
Bayne also thinks that the fact that someone wrote “Hamas sucks
pigshit”, justifies Gabby Silverman attacking
Hannah. It is even more telling that Brooks Bayne and the anti-Israeli crowd are offended by this writing.
This clearly shows that they are not only anti-Jewish-state, but plain
antisemitic. Hamas is every bit as genocidal against Jews as Nazis. Here is
what their Charter says about the salvation day: “when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones
and trees will say, ‘O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and
kill him.”

Ironically Both Gabby and Hannah are Jewish. However Gabby is a sick
self-hating antisemitic Nazi-Hamas supporting Jews, while Hannah is a healthy and
courageous Jewish patriot. I truly admire Hannah for calmly handling the
physical and verbal attacks. But I only wish that she would press charges.