By Patrick Howley, Political Reporter

Jack Ruby was convicted 50 years ago Friday for the murder of Lee Harvey Oswald. Ruby, born Jacob Leon Rubenstein in Chicago in 1911, shot Oswald out of some kind of deep-seated love for the president Oswald had just allegedly killed, according to the official version of events. But the real facts of Ruby’s mid-day November 24, 1963 shooting of Oswald on live national television do little to validate the Warren Commission Report.

Here are seven reasons Ruby likely killed Oswald as part of the conspiracy to assassinate John F. Kennedy:

1. He said so

“Everything pertaining to what’s happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts, of what occurred, my motives. The people had, that had so much to gain and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I’m in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world,” Ruby said on film after he shot Oswald.

Asked if these men were in very high positions, Ruby replied, “Yes.”

2. He even suggested Lyndon Johnson ordered him to do it

“When I mentioned about Adlai Stevenson, if he was vice president there would never have been an assassination of our beloved President Kennedy…Well the answer is the man in office now,” Ruby said in 1963.

3. He was a known gangster

Jack Ruby ate at mafia-world restaurateur Joe Campisi’s Dallas restaurant the night before Kennedy was assassinated.

The House Select Committee on Assassinations found in a 1979 report that Ruby knew Chicago mob boss Sam Giancana, a close Kennedy crony and Fidel Castro assassination plot insider who helped Kennedy win Illinois in the 1960 presidential election. Kennedy and Giancana shared the same mistress, Judith Exner. After Kennedy took office, his brother and attorney general Robert Kennedy used the Justice Department to go after organized crime, even saying, “I want that dago Sam Giancana put away for good.”

4. Why was Oswald being led through the basement of Dallas Police Headquarters in plain sight, accessible to the crowd?

Ruby had easy access to Oswald and nobody tried to stop him before he ran up to the alleged Soviet sympathizer, who was walking while being held on both sides by Dallas police detectives Jim Leavelle and L.C. Graves.

“Ruby’s shooting of Oswald was not a spontaneous act, in that it involved at least some premeditation. Similarly, the committee believed it was less likely that Ruby entered the police basement without assistance, even though the assistance may have been provided with no knowledge of Ruby’s intentions,” the House Select Committee on Assassinations found in 1979.

“The committee was troubled by the apparently unlocked doors along the stairway route and the removal of security guards from the area of the garage nearest the stairway shortly before the shooting… There is also evidence that the Dallas Police Department withheld relevant information from the Warren Commission concerning Ruby’s entry to the scene of the Oswald transfer,” according to the committee.

5. Oswald was asking to be silenced

“I’m just a patsy” Oswald shouted to reporters while in custody before being briskly taken away.

6. Richard Nixon recognized Ruby, having hired him at Lyndon Johnson’s request years before

“Nixon said, ‘The damn thing is, I knew this Jack Ruby. Murray [Chotiner] brought him to me in 1947, said he was one of ‘Johnson’s boys’ and that LBJ wanted us to hire him as an informant to the Committee. We did,’” former Nixon operative Roger Stone told The Daily Caller.

“I think Nixon immediately recognized that LBJ was using one his operatives to do ‘clean up’ work on the murder of John Kennedy,” Stone said.

7. The Warren Commission wouldn’t let him talk

“I want to tell the truth, and I can’t tell it here,” Ruby told Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren in June 1964, after Warren and other commission members including Gerald Ford visited Ruby in Dallas. Warren, whose commission was hastily assembled at the behest of President Johnson to quell conspiracy theories, declined to transport Ruby to Washington, D.C. to testify about what really happened.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/14/why-jack-ruby-was-probably-part-of-the-kennedy-conspiracy/#ixzz2wZvsUMbh

By Roger Stone and Sam Nunberg

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/03/17/On-Benghazi-Hillary-Clinton-Lied-and-Four-Americans-Died

The Senate Select Committee’s Benghazi Report (The Report) makes clear that the deaths of Amb. Christopher Stevens, State Information Officer Sean Smith, and Navy Seals Glen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods could have been prevented on the day of the attack. Above all, their deaths would not have occurred but for Obama and Clinton’s dangerous, Islamist-friendly, and unconstitutional military action against Qadhafi. Even worse, it is clear that Hillary put political “optics” above the security of American lives on the eve of a Presidential election. In that sense it’s a bigger cover-up than Watergate.

Yet former conservative and now infamous Clinton sycophant David Brock, founder of the George Soros-funded front group Media Matters, would have the public believe that Hillary’s deadly failures in Benghazi are non-existent and any criticisms of her, even taken directly out of the bi-partisan, year-long investigation Senate Report, are simply smears. Along with David Kirkpatrick’s shameful New York Times story, which was thoroughly debunked a day later by Fox News from witnesses “who were on the ground” the night of the Islamist attack, it is clear that the Clintonistas are in cahoots to protect Clinton from facing any scrutiny during her 2016 White House bid.

The Report is prima facie evidence that Hillary failed to answer the 3:00 PM call she faced on September 11, 2012 once the attack started on the Mission. Finding #1 of The Report makes clear that Clinton ignored the “ample strategic warning that [the] security situation in eastern Libya was deteriorating and that U.S. facilities and personnel were at risk in Benghazi.” On September 5th, six days before the attack, AFRICOM produced a report stating, on page 11, "disarray in Libya and a likely focus by authorities on pursuit of Qadhafi loyalists is likely allowing jihadists in Libya freedom to recruit, train, and facilitate the movement of fighters and weapons. The threat to Western and U.S. interests and individuals remains high, particularly in northeast-Libya.” Benghazi is the largest city in northeast Libya.

The Report also makes clear that a top Clinton lieutenant denied Amb. Stevens’s requests for greater security at the Benghazi Mission. Finding #2 of The Report states that “(t)he State Department should have increased its security posture more significantly in Benghazi based on the deteriorating security situation... including two incidents at the Temporary Mission Facility on April 6 and June 6, 2012.” [p. 12] Both of these attacks included IEDs being directed by Islamists at the Mission.

The Report explains that Amb. Stevens and other State Department officials outlined “concerns via cables to State Department headquarters about the security of the Mission compound and made several requests for additional resources.” [p. 14] Yet Clinton’s State Department was filled with “confusion over who, ultimately, was responsible and empowered to make decisions on both policy and security concerns.” [p. 16] Simply stated, Clinton was too incompetent to run a proper Department whose bureaucracy could prioritize the safety of her subordinates.

Not only did Hillary’s incompetence bungle the Mission’s security, but direct evidence exists which proves that top State Department officials under Clinton denied the Mission proper safety protocols. Internal State Department memos unearthed by Fox News show that Clinton’s Under Secretary Patrick Kennedy signed off on an action memo “that green-lighted the Benghazi operation” with the caveat that the Mission be “exempted… from mandatory physical security standards” of a Consulate.

It strains credulity to believe that Hillary was not aware of the action memo, especially since Clinton misled the public on a “diplomatic victory” in Libya as early as November 2011 when she “was quick to announce that the U.S. committed $40 million to help Libya secure and recover its weapons stockpiles.” This would be the same month when The Telegraph reported that the Al Qaeda flag was pictured “flying above the Benghazi courthouse building… alongside the Libyan national flag.”

Hillary would have the public believe that her Benghazi incompetence could be washed away in her “bias for action,” as the carefully crafted introduction of Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes’s HRC quotes an unnamed source. Yet the same introduction quotes Hillary telling Kennedy, “the undersecretary who oversaw diplomatic operations,” that “she want(s) to see” Kennedy brief “her team” on the April 5, 2010 assault on an American compound in Peshawar. That would be twenty months before Kennedy signed the deadly Benghazi action memo.

The Report also makes clear that the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence “found no evidence that significant actions were taken by the State Department between August 15, 2012, and September 11, 2012, to increase security at the Mission(.)” [p. 16] Yet The Report redacts eleven security upgrades “quickly” made by the CIA in its Annex “due to the threat of continued attacks against Western personnel in Benghazi(.)” [pp. 19-20] The CIA Annex would repel an attack with loss of US lives the same night our mission was stormed in a precise, military-style attack and four Americans died.

Clinton’s Benghazi Mission did not even install additional surveillance cameras it had received “because the State Department has not yet sent out the technical team necessary to install them.” Further, the camera monitor in the guard force booth “was inoperable on the day of the attacks due to a needed repair by a technical team.” The Report makes clear that “the lack of security enhancements contributed to the security breakdown at the Temporary Mission Facility the night of the attacks.” [p. 21]

While it is no surprise that Hillary or her husband would have any qualms on lying to the American public about the cause of Benghazi attack, or anything else for that matter, it is disconcerting that someone who believes she is capable of serving as Commander in Chief would lie directly to the father of the fallen Navy Seal Tyrone S. Woods on the cause of his son’s unnecessary death. Yet in a memorial service days after the Islamist attack, Hillary approached Tyrone’s father Charles and assured him that the Obama administration was going to "arrest and prosecute" the man that made the scapegoated YouTube video critical of Islam.

The Report does not mention the video once. The Report makes clear in FINDING #9 that any report of a “protest at the Mission facility” was “erroneous” and “caused confusion and influenced the public statements of policymakers.” [p. 34] In fact, “there were no protests outside the Temporary Mission Facility prior to the attacks(.)” [p. 35]

The attack was a multi-pronged, sophisticated assault which was coordinated by Ahmad Abu Khattallah, who is a leading member of the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia. A Fox News source who was on the ground describes the Khattallah’ s operation as a “direct action planned attack” with “(o)ne guy... shooting, one guy... running. There (were) guys watching the gates… The bosses on the ground were pointing, commanding and coordinating.”

450 days after the attack, Khattallah walks freely around Benghazi. The final recommendation of The Report demands that “the U.S. Government must swiftly bring the attackers to justice, in spite of the unwillingness or lack of capacity of the Libyan government to assist in this effort.” [p. 43] The government which Obama and Clinton installed is prohibiting the FBI from operating in Libya. Fifteen Libyans who were cooperating with the FBI have been assassinated. And the FBI’s $10 million reward was not even publicized the first eleven months after it was issued. Clearly, the Obama administration does not consider the attackers a high priority.

One last question remains open from The Report: was the attack on the Benghazi Mission carried out with U.S. weapons? The Intelligence Committee’s press release states that “the U.S. government cannot rely on local security in areas where the United States has facilities under high threat or where the host nation is not capable of providing adequate security.” We know that Amb. Stevens was forced to hire local security militias for protection due to Hillary’s denials of his security requests. The Report explains that Amb. Stevens believed that the local Libyan militia members would provide the “least bad option.” [p. 41]

This is a question on which the American public deserves to know the truth. And yes, Hillary, it does matter!

To Buy Roger Stone Special Edition of the Benghazi Report go here:

http://www.amazon.com/Benghazi-Report-Terrorist-Facilities-September-ebook/dp/B00IQY3D74/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1394759950&sr=1-3&keywords=roger+stone

By Roger Stone

That the Washington Times would allow Hugh Aynesworth to review my book, The Man Who Killed Kennedy – the Case Against LBJ, as if he is an unbiased observer is disconcerting to say the least.

First a bit about Mr. Aynesworth then a stout defense of the case that Lyndon Baines Johnson had unique motive, means and opportunity to murder President John F. Kennedy and credible fingerprint evidence, and that multiple eye-witness testimonies tie a long time, proven LBJ hitman to the shooting from the Texas School Book Depository.

Hugh Ayesnworth has been revealed by released government documents, to be a CIA media asset who in the 1960’s coordinated with the Johnson White House and the FBI and the CIA in covering up the JFK assassination.  Aynesworth was also working hand in glove with Clay Shaw’s defense team in New Orleans to undermine New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison.

A document declassified by the United States in 1966 is a CIA report written on October 10, 1963 when J. Walton Moore, the head of the Dallas CIA Domestic Contacts Division, reported to the chief of the Contact Division on “the possibility of Hugh Grant Aynesworth making a trip to Cuba.”  [4] In other words, one month before the assignation J. Walton Moore – the same CIA agent who had been meeting regularly with the accused assassin’s (Oswald’s) best friend/CIA handler George DeMohrenschildt, was also meeting with Hugh Aynesworth about going to Cuba.

Shirley Martin, a journalist and researcher, wrote a 1967 letter to Garrison about Hugh Aynesworth as Garrison was coming under savage CIA coordinated media attacks at that time. The CIA and the FBI had also both infiltrated Garrison’s office by this time.

Her letter to Garrison is illuminating.

Dear Mr. Garrison:

I am so sorry that Newsweek chose Hugh Aynesworth to use in its rebuttal of you.

In the summer of ‘64 I had a long talk with Mr. Aynesworth, introducing myself to him as a friend of a relative to General Clyde Watts, ex-Major General Edwin A. Walker's close friend and attorney (Oxford). Mr. Aynesworth mistakenly assumed that I was a political conservative and immediately deluged me with disgusting anti-Kennedy stories. ("Kennedy needed a trip to Dallas like a hole in the head," etc.) At the same time Mr. Aynesworth heaped what seemed to me to be inordinate praise on the city of Dallas, the Dallas police (Lt. George Butler, Captain Fritz, Chief Curry, etc.) and the Dallas Morning News (for which newspaper Aynesworth was working at the time.)  He confided, too, that Tom Buchanan (Paris) was a “fairy” and detailed for me a number of extremely slanderous alleged incidents in the life of Mark Lane. In addition, Mr. Aynesworth definitely labeled Mr. Lane a “communist.”

Aynesworth was extremely bitter that Merriman Smith had won the Pulitzer for his coverage of the assassination. Aynesworth sarcastically remarked that Smith "did nothing and saw less" on the day in question, whereas he, Aynesworth was "...the only reporter in America to make all four big scenes." (1)

In addition, Aynesworth boasted that a Commission attorney had already confided to him (in July) what the Commission verdict was to be (in September). Oswald would be named, but according to Aynesworth it was in reality “...a communist plot. Warren will do a cover-up for Moscow."

Aynesworth insisted that Marina had had an affair with him after the assassination, and that during this period she had revealed to him that she and Ruth Paine had shared a Lesbian relationship prior to November 22, 1963.  Aynesworth also declared that he had been on 10th Street “looking down on the Tippit murder scene at 1:05pm, not later than 1:10…” on November 22nd. (2) Needless to say, the "only reporter in America" to be in on all four "big scenes" was NOT called to testify before the Warren Commission, which did, however, call Thayer Waldo, Fort Worth reporter, because he had been in the police basement when Ruby shot Oswald. (3)

Finally, I have the statement by an employee of the Dallas Morning News that Aynesworth was deliberately and ILLEGALLY given the allegedly stolen Oswald diary story by a Commission attorney who was in Dallas on business at that time.  Earl Warren later put the FBI on the trail of this illegal "leak", but as was to be expected no discoveries were made.

“This, then, is the man chosen by Newsweek to rebut you. What a pity Newsweek's taste is so concentrated in its tail”, she concluded.

Mr. Aynesworth has continued to push the idea that there is one iota of evidence the Russians or Cubans assassinated JFK.  There isn’t. It is, however, a lie LBJ personally promulgated to manipulate the men of the Warren Commission to his desired “conclusions.”

Neither Castro nor Khrushchev was elated by the hit on JFK. Khrushchev had just gotten the callow Kennedy to remove US Missiles from Italy and Turkey in a secret deal to resolve the Cuban Missile Crisis. Castro had been approached for a back channel communication with JFK through Ambassador William Atwood, a Princeton classmate of JFK. A French journalist had also passed a message from JFK though his wife Jackie to Castro that JFK “wanted to talk.” Neither had motive at the time JFK was killed. LBJ does.

Lyndon Johnson had unique and urgent motive in the murder of JFK. LBJ knew he faced political ruin and annihilation at the hands of Attorney General Robert Kennedy who had leaked evidence of bribery and corruption to LIFE magazine which planned it’s expose as a cover story in their Dec 1, 1963 issue. LBJ also knew powerful Syndicated Columnist Drew Pearson had written a column that will appear in 700 newspapers on Nov 24, 1963 exposing LBJ’s taking of a $10,000 bribe to fix a Defense contract for a Texas Company- General Dynamics. JFK had already told his personal secretary Evelyn Lincoln LBJ will be dumped from the 1964 ticket. Johnson faced political humiliation, Federal prosecution and prison.

The Man Who Killed Kennedy - the Case Against LBJ ties Mac Wallace irrevocably to Johnson. Aynesworth attempts to debunk the 34 point match fingerprint Wallace left on a cardboard box or the six eye-witnesses who see a man matching Wallace’s description (right down to his eye-glasses) in the window of the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository Building.

LBJ’s control of the Dallas Police Department, the Dallas District Attorney and the Dallas Country Sheriff’s Office is total. Perhaps this is why Robert Kennedy shed a message to the Russians saying that “Dallas was the perfect place for the crime”.

LBJ was the chief appropriator for the CIA, delivering them millions in secret “black box’ budgets tucked into Defense Appropriations and took bribes from the Mob; he is close to both. J. Edgar Hoover, knowing the Kennedys won’t waive his coming mandatory retirement based on his age, helps LBJ button up the investigation initially controlled in Dallas but turned over to the FBI to finish.  Publically available tapes of LBJ talking to Hoover reveal they know Oswald did not kill Kennedy and did not act alone. LBJ also says this to Senator Richard Russell on tape.

Aynesworth would have you believe my case against LBJ relied solely on the statements of Madeline Duncan Brown, who had a sexual relationship with LBJ over a 20 year period. Brown confuses an early evening cocktail party and a meeting much later, after 1:00 am at the home of right wing oilman Clint Murchison.  Many Dallas figures including Congressman Bruce Alger confirm attending the early party. Nixon Aide Charles McWhorter went to Murchison’s in gratitude for Murchison kicking in to Nixon’s 1962 campaign for Governor with $100,000. LBJ was not at the cocktail party; Nixon was. He was indeed seen at his hotel at 10 pm. LBJ arrives after midnight, when the party has died down. Nixon was not at the late night meeting. LBJ was. A housekeeper and a chauffeur both said on videotape when interviewed for the British TV show, The Men Who Killed Kennedy, that the late night confab was held behind closed doors and that LBJ, Hoover, Murchison, HD Byrd, and John Currington, a lawyer for HL Hunt, were in the meeting – the same names Brown sited.

Aynesworth also seeks to discredit LBJ crony Billie Sol Estes who testified under oath and under threat of perjury that he LBJ and LBJ Aide Cliff Carter planned the murder of US Agriculture Henry Marshall. Estes also testified that Carter knew of least 17 murders LBJ had ordered to cover up voter fraud or corruption. Estes lawyer Douglas caddy would write the Justice Department for Estes to testify of as to LBJ’s direct involvement with eight specific murdered including that of John F, Kennedy. Estes did this after serving of his time in prison and after LBJ’s death, when there was no conceivable benefit to him. Aynesworth invents a conversation  with Billie Sol in which he says otherwise that never actually took place according to Bille Sol’s daughter.

LBJ was the lynchpin of a plot that included the CIA and their associates in Organized Crime with whom they plotted the assassination of Castro. Military Intelligence, Big Texas Oil, furious about JFK’s efforts to repeal their sweetheart tax break- the Oil Depletion Allowance – financed the coup d’etat.

“Cui prodest secleces est fict” say the Latins. “He who derives the greatest benefit from the crime is the one who committed it.” Don’t take the word of CIA disinformantist Hugh Ayneswoth.  Read the compelling case I make against amoral psychopath Lyndon Baines Johnson in The Man Who Killed Kennedy- the Case Against LBJ.

http://www.amazon.com/Man-Who-Killed-Kennedy-Against/dp/1626363137/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1395161338&sr=1-1&keywords=roger+stone 

By Roger Stone

Adam Paul Laxalt is a father, a husband and a fourth-generation native Nevadan, the grandson of Sen. Paul Laxalt a friend of mine since I worked with the Senator in Ronald Reagan's 1976 , 1980 and 1984 campaigns. Adam is running for Attorney General of Nevada to protect the safety of Nevada’s families, to preserve the liberty of Nevada’s citizens and businesses and to stand up for Nevadans against federal government overreach. This may be one of the most important elections of 2014.

Adam graduated Magna Cum Laude from Georgetown University and also graduated from the Georgetown University Law Center. He is a former Lieutenant in the United States Navy.  Trained by the US Navy as a prosecutor and legal advisor, Adam served his country as a Judge Advocate General for five years. While in the Navy, Adam volunteered to serve in a combat zone in Iraq.

In Iraq at Forward Operating Base Camp Victory, Adam’s team was in charge of more than 20,000 detainees during the Surge, keeping our troops and the world safer by assisting with the detention and prosecution of thousands of war criminals and terrorists. They were also in charge of training our military on proper evidence gathering in the field to ensure criminals and terrorists were able to be prosecuted successfully. Training Iraqi Prosecutors and Judges, they helped modernize their justice system. For his exemplary service, Adam was awarded the Joint Service Commendation Medal and the Iraq Campaign Medal, and his Unit was awarded the Joint Meritorious Unit Award.

Adam has served as a Special Assistant US Attorney, as an Assistant Professor of Law in the Leadership, Ethics, and the Law Department at the US Naval Academy and as a Special Advisor to the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security.  Throughout his time in military and government service, Adam has worked to put Americans' security first.

Since departing the Navy, Adam has built a law practice in Las Vegas, solving problems for a wide array of Nevadans and Nevada businesses.  As a community leader, Adam has worked with Nevadans facing the challenges of a difficult economy, difficulties often made worse by poor government leadership.  Adam serves on the Board of Trustees for Catholic Charities of Southern Nevada, the largest private social services agency in the state.  Adam co-founded the Saint Thomas More Society, a legal ethics and leadership society that has sponsored numerous legal education and leadership events in Nevada. Adam was recently appointed by the Nevada State Bar to serve on a Civility Task Force to help work on increasing civility amongst lawyers in Nevada.

Republicans constantly complain about the lack of "bench" in the GOP. Here then is a candidate for America's future.

To contribute go to https://adamlaxalt.nationbuilder.com/contribute#25