TERROR ON THE TUBE

 Five years after the event, we have a judgement from Britain’s High Court:

• The 7/7 killings were ‘unlawful.’  Uh-huh.
• Nobody was to blame, except the wicked Four who are dead.
• A public enquiry into 7/7 would not be a good idea.
• There is no need for an Inquest into the Four alleged perpetrators.
• No ‘conspiracy’ would have been possible

We should here remind ourselves, as to the proper purpose of an inquest.

An inquest is meant to come to a judgement concerning cause of death.

In the very strange circumstances of the 7/7 Inquest, Lady Justice Hallett could not do this because no post-portems had been performed upon the 52 dead bodies. continue reading…

The roof neatly lifted off, when the No. 30 bus blew up in Tavistock Square, that morning.  A bit too neatly.

It had been cut.

We can see the cut-line along the base of the upper roof support:

This was discovered by the American Simon Shack, in October 2010 – continue reading…

THE PERFECT CRIME had been planned. It would make history, and be the British answer to 9/11. After years of planning, it was ready to go! No-one would ever guess…

It was part of the main sequence of terror-events which have arced across our world in the New Millenium, extinguishing the hope which we had for the new century: 9/11 in New York, the Bali bomb of 2002, the Istanbul bomb of 2003, Madrid railway station in 2004 and then London in 2005: followed by the Mumbai train blasts of 2006. They have served to define the new Enemy  – the phantom menace – and ratify Empire.  

But, two things went badly wrong, for the July 7^th event. Both of these simply came out of the blue, continue reading…