Ashjwest wrote:
It might be an idea to try and regulate how many "good" vs "evil" warbands are involved. I'd like to see a CP system again, with some more thoughts on balancing them out (the evil one in the last campaign stood out a little IMO).


Will take that on board and have a think RE: Good and Evil warbands. I do think CP will re-appear, it's a nice way of keeping track of how 'advanced' a warband is, and warband bonuses will probably be connected to it.

Ashjwest wrote:
With the "enforcer" warbands you talked about, would this be your perminant band or a dynamic spare warband? What about the idea of objective specific Bertha style dramatis persons(?) that would help out weaker warbands when taking on the powerhouses.

It would be a 'spare' warband- in Mordheim/Necromunda/Inquisitor campaigns I've been involved with in my local gaming group, the 'enforcers' are a police force essentially- if one group gets lucky early on and starts running away with it too quickly (making the whole campaign a lot less fun/pointless) they have to play the enforcer warband, who are designed to take them down a peg or two. Having Dramatis Personae would be a good idea. Perhaps if your rating=x less than your opponent you get to roll on a good/evil Dramatis Personae table with a choice of three.

Ashjwest wrote:
We should really discuss the mechanics of how we'll use battle chronicler for multi player games. Also it's not great at representing the 3d nature of Mordheim. I miss dropping people from the top of towers

Yes, we should. At some point... And I know Battle Chronicler isn't perfect, but if we say moving up a floor takes 2" it's generally easy enough to say 'I've moved my model up two floors' in the email. It's not perfect, but it's equal for everyone and saves confusion.

Conveniently putting this campaign in the countryside makes it less likely we'll have big buildings.

Ashjwest wrote:
Not sure about fluff bonus's, while its great to get as much in as possible I don't think penalising the people who don't want or have time to write fluff is the best way to go.

It's difficult- a story-driven campaign is generally more fun if people put in their own little bits. I wouldn't make the bonuses so massive that people who didn't want to or couldn't write anything would be penalised for doing so. I'll have a think about it.