Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



ari_o ([info]ari_o) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-01-03 03:31:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:author entitlement, boo hoo, can't escape the screencaps, crazy people, dan fogelberg's llamas, doesn't mean what you think it means, entitlement, f_w is serious business, fandom_wank's thoughts on yaoi, fanfic, goddammit you guys be funnier!, grinch, i know it because of my learnings, i see stupid people, look how much i don't care, my education let me show you it, my pretension let me show you it, oppression, otf_wank, otw, persecution, reading comprehension whut?, sockpuppets, someone is wrong on the internet!, suck it up and deal, taking it too seriously, the tags are a lie!, too many fucking tags, wanking inside the house, we love jf tags, we're not allowed to say whore anymore, where's the phosfate is a whore tag?, whores whores and more whores, whores!!!!!!!, writers are often pompous douches, you're all whores!, yuletide means christmas!, yuletide means whores!

Beat your breasts, maidens, and rend your tunics.
There once was an archive for Yuletide
and when it died every other fool cried
stop thief
in erroneous belief
that their fics were about to go worldwide


Background:

Yuletide archived their 2009 fics at the OTW's new "archive of our own" (A3O or AO3). The old Yuletide archive is falling apart and to preserve the stories there the worker bees are planning to bring the old stories over and upload them to the new archive. They haven't done it yet because Yuletide just finished, family likes to see one during the holidays, and exhaustion has set in. Word from on high is that AO3 will do their best to track down authors and let them know about the move and give them the option to have their name removed from the story (orphaning it) or to have the story removed. Removing stories is considered uncool. The Yuletide entry rules explain that the stories submitted are there to be preserved for everyone's enjoyment and ask that you orphan a story instead of having it taken down from the archive.


Set up:

[info]redbrunja doesn't understand why asking about OTW and AO3 on the Yuletide discussion boards is off topic. She fails to understand no matter how carefully it is explained to her that there other places she can discuss AO3 or OTW. She still thinks it should be considered on topic, because she would consider it on topic if she were a mod. This is like a beautiful marriage of a strawman and a slippery slope.

"You know, I am really not pleased about the Yuletide mods' policy of silence about the move to the A03. Especially since they have a policy of silence about their policy of silence."

eta: dammit [info]redbrunja disabled comments, but [info]galateus to the rescue with a screencap here.

[info]franzeska tries to explain the history of wanky issues related to OTW. [info]redbrunja doesn't agree. Whatever. Differing opinions and all is well and good. On we march.

Until [info]merricatk shows up to tell everyone they don't like her and she knows she is basically just dirt under their shoes. I debated about whether or not this was funny. It could go either way. I see her behaviour as monumentally passive aggressive, but ymmv. She posts a hand wringer in her own LJ about how she is always marginalized in every group she ever joins and they just want her stories and never want to be her friends. O_O

[info]merricatk: "I don't care about OTW one way or the other. What I feel strongly about is having my story moved to what seems to be a more public place without my even being informed about it.

I'm trying to limit my fannish activity and make my fiction less public. This move seems to be the antithesis of that.

If looking after my best interests instead of hoping someone else will do it for me makes me a classless jerkass, that's fine with me. I don't see it as anything to be embarrassed about.

[info]wordsofastory: The reason no one has contacted you is because it has not begun. Yuletide 2009 just happened, the mods are still dealing with/recovering from that; there is no current activity going on with the older stories. The movement of old Yuletide stories to the new AO3 archive is a future plan. When it happens, every effort will be made to contact not just you, but all the authors involved.

You're not being left out, because nothing has happened yet. That would be obvious if.


But no one can seem to make [info]merricatk happy about her story being moved to the Yultide comm at AO3. She wants to take it down and doesn't seem to think the rules for the exchange should apply to her now that the archive is changing from one website to another one.

[info]merrycatk wrote one NYR story 5 years ago and that's what she is concerned about. She posts in her lj.

"So, I heard it through the grapevine that all of the yuletide stories are being moved to A3O. I don't move in that circle, so everything I know comes secondhand. I've only ever written one story that's on the yuletide website, a NYR story. It was a whim, and I was still thinking that fandom might work for me.

This was several years ago. There was nothing bad about the experience.

Since then I've come to a few realizations about myself. One of them is, I was born, and will probably die, an outsider. I don't fit. Sometimes, for short periods, with certain groups, I can be part of the in-crowd. But I always ask the wrong questions, the ones nobody else thinks of. I always cause trouble, and I need way too much down time from people, and I'm way, way too needy.

The movers and shakers of fandom don't want to answer my questions, they don't want to be bothered with my moodiness, and they certainly don't want to cater to my needs, which are emotional in nature.

They do want my stories. I've had more than one offer to archive my stories, and I've said yes more than once because of my neediness. I thought the offer to "work with me" on putting my stories online meant they wanted to spend some time with me. What I found out was that except of approving a layout and emailing the stories, I was now extraneous to the whole process. So I've put my stories back in my pocket and am (slowly) posting them on my LJ.

Now the yuletide stories are being moved to what I, in my infinite ignorance, consider to be a potentially more public venue, which I'm not comfortable with. (Why do I see it as being more public? Because it's supposed to be easier to find things there, because it has been so publicized and so has yuletide. Am I wrong about this? Everyone says so.)

It's also being run by movers and shakers--things always are; they're the ones who run things, they have the temperament for it, it's nothing against them. But I'm not comfortable with them. And I'm in a position of either letting them take my story and be quiet while put it wherever they want it--without, so far, them saying a word to me about it; or taking my story back and have people call me names.

Or I can orphan my story by taking my name off of it.

I wish they weren't using the word orphan. It's too poetic, it puts to sharp a point on the abandonment, it makes me feel terrible. I have abandonment issues. Call me a thief for taking my story back and I can deal with it. Say I'm making my story an orphan, I'll cry.

And I wish they weren't telling me again that I can go--just leave the story. Because I already know I'm extraneous, except for the stories.

I'm perfectly aware that I'm completely wrong about all of this, but being told how wrong I am is only going to push me harder into putting this story in my pocket, too. I'm perfectly aware that my feelings--and all this is nothing but my feelings--are indefensible. But I don't like it when the powerful people come and tell me how unreasonable I am not to want to do things their way. Not ask, just tell.

I can live with being disliked, considered a screwball, or an angry, shitty, classless, selfish jerkass, and I can live with people believing the lie that I'm doing this because I hate OTW and/or A3O. I can live with the whole rest of the world considering me irrational."

Most of her friend commiserate. And here is where it gets juicy.

: "I think AO3 defenders are bizarre. They are basically getting behind a group of people who want to academicize and homogenize fanfic. To put it plainly: OTW is a bunch of people who couldn't cut it as 18th century literature junior faculty, so they're basically trying to invent this new "transformative works" field on which to hang their academic ambitions. I firmly believe that these people are trying to use fans to get ahead (a la their rival Laura Hale). They might put a nicer spin on it--protecting fandom, preserving works, creating some big monumental archive that will legitimize fanfiction--but what they're doing is just another example of career-jockeying. Sure, they're not profiting off of AO3--not monetarily. But there are other ways of profiting. So I sort of can't believe that anyone would voluntarily hand over their stuff to AO3. I mean, you're basically saying, "Yes, make me your dissertation project."

[info]tzikeh responds: I could understand if you didn't like, or want to participate in OTW, if your own personal philosophy conflicts with the OTW's philosophy, but you are astoundingly uninformed--and willfully ignorant.

Have you bothered read the Who We Are section of the OTW site? That's a rhetorical question, since the answer is clear. The board is made up of WILDLY successful people--a Professor of Law at Georgetown who clerked for the Supreme Court; a Director of Film Studies and Professor of English at Muhlenberg; an MBA and CPA who worked for the U.S. Senate; and the woman who wrote the open-source code that has been the base for nearly every fannish archive that was created after she wrote it--oh, and a little something called the New York Times best-selling Temeraire series.

Yeah, they're all clearly people who couldn't cut it as 18th-century literature junior faculty."


[info]salvidar_as says "Yes, I've read the OTW site. I'm aware of the resumes of these so-called academics. I'm aware that they haven't produced academically sound or particularly rigorous work (I've read it). I've also read the academic journal. And it's bad. I am not willfully ignorant; these people are hacks."

[info]tzikeh calls SOCKPUPPET!

[info]salvidar_as "What a bizarre little post. I don't really owe you anything--no explanation, no social security number or CV. I don't need a biography to qualify my point of view. I don't think that one post in a person's personal journal qualifies as a "teabagging" movement--did you check your IQ at the door?

What's clear to me--and what's becoming increasingly clear to me--is that you AO3 people are absolutely insane. Everyone is apparently required to get on board the OTW train, and anyone who questions the academic merit of such a project (and yes, there are questions of merit--large ones) is a teabagger or a bully or a sockpuppet. Good job furthering the negative perceptions of the OTW fear-mongering machine. You're making Laura Hale look sane and lucid, and I didn't think that was possible.

I could write a lengthy response as to why OTW's academic journal is, well, kind of a joke (and OTW is regarded as a joke in most academic circles--you probably don't need me to tell you that ... or maybe you do), but I don't think that merritcatk actually intended this post for such purposes. If you want to defend OTW's academic purpose (ha), you have your choice of wank threads already in full swing.

Obviously, if OTW's reputation as a serious academic venture were truly unassailable, we wouldn't be having this conversation, because you wouldn't have to defend the organization against an insignificant, anonymous teabagger like me with my big lies and misinformation. But what I said must have hit a note. Oh my."

[info]tzikeh: I still say sockpuppet is you.

[info]salvidar_as "Okay, good luck defending the organization of scooby doo studies. Bye."


This end does not satisfying [info]tzikeh so she makes a post in her lj. "because she has fucking had it" and the discussion is just about clarifying and not very wanky--although possibly interesting when [info]liviapenn shows up and clarifies a few issues.

OH ETA: [info]melodyclark is here to show us all that even older women like to wank like horny thirteen year olds, but if she doesn't give it a rest I'm worried she's going to go blind, develop hairy palms, AND come down with a raging case of carpal tunnel syndrome.

thanks to [info]inquisition for the heads up.

eta 3.1415 The abyss is looking into us... and it's fucking stupid. :D

bonus lulz: [info]tzikeh point out to me that [info]melodyclark tried to edit her fanlore page.



On January 8, 2010 she edited her page to read:

"Melody does not exist. She is a figment of your imagination. So long and thanks for all the fiche."

It used to say:

"Melody wrote her first fan story in 1978, and started participating fannishly online in the early 90's, as an early member of Virgule. She is still in fandom and her fan fic site is at http://melodyclark.net and also on FanFiction.net[1]. However, in 2009 she announced she would no longer be publishing her fan fiction on the Internet for free, choosing instead to work with print fanzines exclusively. This came after a fan offered a not-completely positive review of her Holmes/Watson story "Akin to Love" which had appeared twenty years before in the print zine No Holds Barred #1.[2] [3] She made a similar online exit in 2007. [4]
Her zines

Melody Clark's Blake's 7 and Wiseguy novels are now published by Mysti Frank (agentwithstyle.com). Judith Proctor publishes the Blake's 7 novels that Judith herself reedited and republished as the initial published version was fraught with errors. Kathy Resch publishes Melody's Dark Shadows Grayson Hall zine as well as the award-winning Fire and Ice issue #1 which Melody co-edited with Kathy. Melody now writes in various other fandoms. In the early 2000s she briefly published fanzines under the name The M Press and distributed them via Mysti Frank. In 2009 she created the Media Fen website with the goal of offering fanzine publishers a location to advertise their zines.[5] "

Amazing someone can flounce over and over and not get it--like a sad rat in a maze who keeps zapping herself instead of avoiding the electrified cheese. Cheese is delicious though.




Page 4 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]twinno
2010-01-05 06:39 am UTC (link)
Oh, didn't you know we're all the same person? I read it all yesterday. Somehow, we have been able to morph into multiple bodies (yours substantially thinner than mine and located across the country). It's the Einstein Podolsky Rosen effect, I'm thinking. And yet somehow we're paranoid and they aren't? ;)

So that's how Caito does it.

(Reply to this)


[info]juliansinger
2010-01-05 06:42 am UTC (link)
Not to pry or anything, but just which community did Melody leave because of the legions of comments in Merricat's previous post? Since the commentflood didn't /come/ from a community.

Oh, wait, earth logic.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 06:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-05 10:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-05 04:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]castalianspring, 2010-01-07 03:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sharps, 2010-01-06 03:47 am UTC

[info]innocentsmith
2010-01-05 06:50 am UTC (link)
RE: eta pi: Okay, first of all, merricatk is deploring some wanka's misspelling of her name in the same post in which she calls us "fan_wank". But, in addition:

Really, if you're going to ridicule other people, you need to at least proofread. That's just basic.

ALL MOCKERY MUST ADHERE TO RIGOROUS EDITORIAL STANDARDS, U GUISE. I wonder if there's a blood-alcohol limit involved? 'Cause if there is, I'm betting I'm not the only one who's screwed.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bacon_lover, 2010-01-05 07:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 07:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-05 01:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-05 04:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-05 07:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 07:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-05 07:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 07:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-05 07:31 am UTC
I'M NOT! - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-05 11:02 pm UTC
Re: I'M NOT! - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 11:03 pm UTC
Re: I'M NOT! - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-06 12:25 am UTC
Re: I'M NOT! - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 12:32 am UTC
Re: I'M NOT! - [info]sharps, 2010-01-06 03:49 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 04:11 am UTC
... - [info]irised, 2010-01-06 05:41 am UTC
... - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-01-06 06:15 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 06:19 am UTC
... - [info]enrythe8th, 2010-01-06 03:42 pm UTC
... - [info]reeve, 2010-01-06 04:49 pm UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-06 07:15 pm UTC
... - [info]enrythe8th, 2010-01-06 07:23 pm UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-06 07:25 pm UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-06 07:26 pm UTC
((Late as always)) - [info]lyrangalia, 2010-01-07 07:37 pm UTC
GIP - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-06 05:45 am UTC
Re: GIP - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-06 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]schrodingerscat, 2010-01-05 08:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kaiya_chan, 2010-01-05 09:28 am UTC
I just wanted an excuse to post the phrase "Wanka's Ball" - [info]cesare, 2010-01-05 11:09 am UTC
Re: I just wanted an excuse to post the phrase "Wanka's Ball" - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-05 04:33 pm UTC
Re: I just wanted an excuse to post the phrase "Wanka's Ball" - [info]cesare, 2010-01-05 04:37 pm UTC
Re: I just wanted an excuse to post the phrase "Wanka's Ball" - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-05 04:57 pm UTC
... - [info]undomielregina, 2010-01-05 05:33 pm UTC
... - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-01-05 05:54 pm UTC
... - [info]undomielregina, 2010-01-05 06:05 pm UTC
... - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-01-05 06:37 pm UTC
... - [info]undomielregina, 2010-01-05 06:43 pm UTC
... - [info]goblin, 2010-01-06 05:34 am UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-01-06 08:43 am UTC
... - [info]goblin, 2010-01-06 05:25 pm UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-01-06 05:30 pm UTC
... - [info]goblin, 2010-01-07 05:36 pm UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-01-07 05:53 pm UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-05 11:04 pm UTC
Re: I just wanted an excuse to post the phrase "Wanka's Ball" - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 10:53 pm UTC
Re: I just wanted an excuse to post the phrase "Wanka's Ball" - [info]witty, 2010-01-06 03:24 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 03:36 am UTC
... - [info]witty, 2010-01-06 03:55 am UTC
Re: I just wanted an excuse to post the phrase "Wanka's Ball" - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 10:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-06 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 12:44 am UTC
... - [info]brennalarose, 2010-01-06 06:46 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparklepuss, 2010-01-05 02:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2010-01-05 08:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2010-01-05 02:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-05 07:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2010-01-05 04:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-05 04:35 pm UTC

[info]sisterelwood
2010-01-05 07:06 am UTC (link)
*looks at title of website*looks at how merricatk refers to it in ETA pi*

Reading must not be your strong point, sweet cheeks.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-05 08:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-05 04:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]reeve, 2010-01-05 04:56 pm UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-05 11:08 pm UTC
... - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-05 11:24 pm UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-06 12:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2010-01-06 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 12:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-06 02:35 am UTC
... - [info]hallidae, 2010-01-06 03:19 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 03:39 am UTC

[info]amireal
2010-01-05 07:30 am UTC (link)
Man. Really? Keeping track of a 6 month old post? So we're not allowed to have memories now? We're not allowed to cite our sources? Because yes, that's totally stalking. Just because her memories appear swiss-cheesed in conversation doesn't mean everyone's are.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-05 10:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 12:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lizbee, 2010-01-05 01:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-05 04:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2010-01-05 05:37 pm UTC

[info]stella_polaris
2010-01-05 03:41 pm UTC (link)
This is pretty fucked up right here.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-06 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2010-01-06 02:48 pm UTC

[info]wankismyfandom
2010-01-05 03:58 pm UTC (link)
I'd just like to add a little love for your limerick.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 12:20 am UTC

[info]caoilainn
2010-01-05 05:16 pm UTC (link)
I keep re-reading Melody's comments at the eta pi and my goodness, it was not like I thought she lacked self-esteem, but she has become like some kind of case study of when fandom elders go bad in my head. It is hilarious.

It really is too bad she had to unsubscribe from the Wiseguy community, because you know she was one of the first people ever to write in the fandom, but she knows all the writers she cares about anyway, so whatever. *unsubs*

LMAO, I love it. She says this all *without irony* - how is that even possible?

(Reply to this)


[info]aloysius
2010-01-05 05:58 pm UTC (link)
Appears she's thrown hissyfits about feedback and flounced before -- not even to her own LJ, but to the unsuspecting masses of the Wiseguy community.

(What? I was bored at work.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]shayheyred, 2010-01-05 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]danceswithelvis, 2010-01-06 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparklepuss, 2010-01-06 03:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2010-01-06 06:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-06 06:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 06:46 am UTC
... - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-06 04:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]enrythe8th, 2010-01-06 03:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2010-01-06 05:28 pm UTC

[info]glossing2
2010-01-05 07:48 pm UTC (link)
Melodyclark & Merricatk have a point to make. A VERY IMPORTANT POINT that only they are brave and foolhardy enough to broadcast.

Melodyclark: it's well known fact [sic] that writers are not allowed to defend themselves and Merricatk: But writers aren’t even allowed to post about feeling alone, aren’t allowed to say, “I can’t keep writing if I don’t feel anyone cares, I gotta hear *something* back or it’s all so demoralizing, all I can think is that the stories must be horrible.” Because that’s whining. Because that’s unseemly. Because that *will* get you ridiculed, and you will deserve it.

In case it's not clear, here is their very important point of importance & significance: WRITERS ARE THE LOWEST OF THE LOW, DON'T YOU KNOW?

Come, let us preen our persecution complexes to a lovely high shine.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-05 07:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2010-01-05 08:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rodo, 2010-01-05 08:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2010-01-05 08:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rodo, 2010-01-05 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2010-01-05 11:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-06 12:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2010-01-06 12:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-06 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2010-01-06 09:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-06 04:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-06 01:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-06 01:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 01:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-06 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2010-01-06 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2010-01-06 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-06 05:54 am UTC

[info]wook77
2010-01-05 08:19 pm UTC (link)
I'm sorry I spelled Merrycatk's name wrong. I did not mean to add to her persecution complex except that I totally did. But it's not my fault that you all just had to remind her that her friends were too busy with Criminal Minds to commiserate with her and she only has one true friend who thinks she's more important than Criminal Minds.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-05 09:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2010-01-05 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-06 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 06:23 am UTC
... - [info]brennalarose, 2010-01-06 06:53 am UTC
... - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-06 07:58 am UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 08:19 am UTC
... - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-06 08:21 am UTC
... - [info]aloysius, 2010-01-06 09:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-01-06 04:39 am UTC

[info]veleda_k
2010-01-06 04:08 am UTC (link)
Wow, Melodyclark is a total lunatic.

...Sorry, I got nothing else. I'm still kind of in shock.

(Reply to this)


[info]phosfate
2010-01-06 05:41 am UTC (link)
"scooby doo studies."

I laughed.

Has anyone in Cult Studs actually done Scooby-Doo? I don't know how one would approach it. It doesn't have much of an actual fandom, but everybody seems to know it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 06:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misachan, 2010-01-06 06:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-06 10:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-06 04:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2010-01-06 05:22 pm UTC
*hails* - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-06 06:51 pm UTC
THIS IS NOT AN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2010-01-06 08:04 pm UTC

[info]cyndra_falin
2010-01-06 07:34 am UTC (link)
So MerryKats is NOT in some corner weeping, being a total, emotional wreck? Well at least shes not embarrassed by her emotions, not at all. In the end, isn't THAT what truly matters?

I think shes totally over us, guise. Really. For real. This time. Yeah.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-06 07:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2010-01-06 07:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-06 08:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 08:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-06 09:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-06 09:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 09:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-06 11:09 am UTC
... - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-06 11:26 am UTC
... - [info]cesare, 2010-01-06 11:51 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 11:55 am UTC
... - [info]cesare, 2010-01-06 12:31 pm UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 12:12 pm UTC
... - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-06 04:53 pm UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-06 03:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-06 06:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-06 06:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-06 03:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-06 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-06 04:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2010-01-07 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]youngcurmudgeon, 2010-01-07 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2010-01-07 08:04 pm UTC

[info]tunxeh
2010-01-06 07:49 am UTC (link)
What I'm learning from this wank: [info]duraniedramawrites fics only for herself, reads them, and then deletes them so that nobody else can read them. I guess that's why they call it "wank".

What I'm not getting is why she has any interest in what happens on public fic archives.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-06 08:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2010-01-06 11:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 11:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2010-01-06 07:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-06 11:28 pm UTC
... - [info]puipui, 2010-01-07 02:28 am UTC
... - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-01-07 06:20 am UTC
... - [info]puipui, 2010-01-07 10:17 am UTC
... - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-01-08 03:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-06 06:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-06 09:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-07 04:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sharps, 2010-01-07 10:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-07 10:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]monty, 2010-01-06 11:50 pm UTC

[info]lemonsherry
2010-01-06 09:26 am UTC (link)
I found this, in Ann Marlowe's book about her days of using heroin. "And when you are alienated enough from your feelings to be able to identify with the exterior viewpoint, you decide you're cool."

Only I don't want to be cool, I want my feelings. Good and bad, they're much better than being cool.


I don't even want to know what my face looked like while reading this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]galateus, 2010-01-06 04:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lurker32, 2010-01-07 07:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]laurelin_kit, 2010-01-07 07:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2010-01-07 08:02 pm UTC

[info]urpletastic
2010-01-06 10:49 am UTC (link)
You can write. That's the only reason they pick on you. ([info]melodyclark here.)

Because nobody over here can write worth shit and we're all jellus. Self-aggrandising much? I had never heard of this merricat person before the wank but I seriously doubt whether there's anything she writes that I'd want to read. And as for [info]melodyclark, I've read her stuff - and she isn't nearly as good as she thinks she is.

Beginning to realise at last why we have an 'I see stupid people' tag. Thank goodness.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 11:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-06 11:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-06 03:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-06 06:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 08:57 pm UTC
... - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-06 11:34 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 11:53 pm UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-01-08 09:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2010-01-06 04:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-06 06:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fishies, 2010-01-06 08:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-06 11:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]veleda_k, 2010-01-08 08:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-08 10:14 am UTC

[info]stella_polaris
2010-01-06 02:43 pm UTC (link)
She's.... really missing the point of what FW is all about.

I do love her classic "Oh I don't care, see how much I don't care, I don't even remember what they said about me, that fan_wank or whatever, see I don't care so much I don't even remember their name, SEE HOW I SHOW HOW I DON'T CARE BY MAKING A POST ABOUT HOW I DON'T CARE! No, really, I don't care," behaviour though.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-06 03:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doire, 2010-01-06 03:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-06 05:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-06 05:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-07 01:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 10:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-07 09:24 am UTC

[info]twinno
2010-01-06 05:04 pm UTC (link)
I need a "for dummies" version of this wank. I don't know what's going on anymore, except that [info]merricatk is going to poison our sugar. Don't eat the blackberries, you guys!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-06 05:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 07:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 07:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2010-01-06 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-06 08:15 pm UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 08:33 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 09:00 pm UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 09:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]innocentsmith, 2010-01-07 03:52 am UTC
... - [info]snarkhunter, 2010-01-07 04:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-06 07:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-06 11:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2010-01-06 05:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-06 07:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2010-01-06 07:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-06 07:24 pm UTC
... - [info]twinno, 2010-01-06 07:27 pm UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-07 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-06 05:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-06 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]twinno, 2010-01-06 07:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-06 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2010-01-06 06:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-06 07:01 pm UTC

[info]kantayra
2010-01-06 05:26 pm UTC (link)
I appreciate the irony of [info]merricatk posting this in her massive "I do not care about the fan_wank!" post: Also, I'm supposed to be ashamed of what I posted Sunday.

...And then bahleeting that post.

A++ wanking.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-06 05:47 pm UTC

[info]juliansinger
2010-01-06 10:08 pm UTC (link)
Dear Merricat:

The reason why people noticed you in the first place is not because you have feelings, it's because you had a specfic, logical question which did not require that you include five paragraphs detailing the gaping void in your soul.

Owning and understanding your own feelings is great. It's a long journey, and worth making.

Spraying those feelings all over everyone, when you have a useful point which does not require the world to know about them, is /less/ great.

Also, not to criticize, but it might be better to, I dunno, go and /make friends/, rather than complaining that no one who reads your stories wants to /be/ friends. (I mean. You /have/ friends. That's pretty obvious. So why the rest of the world is required to engage kind of baffles me.)

Dear Melody:

We're picking on her because she's being an embarrassing exhibitionist with no off switch, not because she can or can't write. Just thought you might want to know.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 10:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-06 11:44 pm UTC
I don't even think that's it - [info]cesare, 2010-01-07 01:18 am UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]juliansinger, 2010-01-07 01:39 am UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-07 01:50 am UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-07 02:15 am UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]liebestod, 2010-01-07 03:23 am UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]moljn, 2010-01-07 02:40 am UTC
Yeah, that's it - [info]solar_boat, 2010-01-07 04:09 am UTC
Re: Yeah, that's it - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2010-01-07 04:15 am UTC
... - [info]solar_boat, 2010-01-07 04:30 am UTC
... - [info]irised, 2010-01-08 12:14 am UTC
Re: Yeah, that's it - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-07 07:31 am UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]shayheyred, 2010-01-07 07:42 pm UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-07 11:45 pm UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]cesare, 2010-01-08 01:11 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 01:21 am UTC
... - [info]shayheyred, 2010-01-08 03:37 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 04:05 am UTC
... - [info]shayheyred, 2010-01-08 04:07 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 04:10 am UTC
... - [info]franzeska, 2010-01-08 07:01 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 07:45 am UTC
... - [info]franzeska, 2010-01-08 08:27 am UTC
... - [info]sharps, 2010-01-08 12:43 pm UTC
... - [info]cesare, 2010-01-09 04:25 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-09 05:22 am UTC
... - [info]catwalksalone, 2010-01-09 11:14 am UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-08 01:16 am UTC
Re: I don't even think that's it - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 01:26 am UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-08 04:49 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 04:52 am UTC
... - [info]funwithrage, 2010-01-08 03:43 pm UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-08 06:59 pm UTC
... - [info]inalasahl, 2010-01-08 09:05 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 09:40 am UTC
... - [info]inalasahl, 2010-01-08 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bacon_lover, 2010-01-07 02:05 am UTC
but then, you sort of said that. - [info]juliansinger, 2010-01-07 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sharps, 2010-01-07 07:04 pm UTC

[info]mochibuni
2010-01-07 06:32 am UTC (link)
OH NOES, meerkat is poisoning our sugar! However shall we bake our cookies now?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-07 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2010-01-07 09:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2010-01-07 10:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2010-01-07 10:16 am UTC
... - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-07 10:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-07 05:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2010-01-07 08:08 pm UTC
... - [info]danceswithelvis, 2010-01-07 10:03 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-07 11:40 pm UTC
... - [info]notjo, 2010-01-07 11:44 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-07 11:45 pm UTC
... - [info]notjo, 2010-01-07 11:47 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 12:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]youngcurmudgeon, 2010-01-08 06:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2010-01-09 07:19 pm UTC

[info]wankismyfandom
2010-01-07 04:47 pm UTC (link)
This is how I picture her.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 04:08 am UTC

[info]urpletastic
2010-01-08 08:43 am UTC (link)
However, in 2009 she announced she would no longer be publishing her fan fiction on the Internet for free, choosing instead to work with print fanzines exclusively. This came after a fan offered a not-completely positive review of her Holmes/Watson story "Akin to Love"


OMG, the poor fragile flower! How dare anyone not think she was perfect???

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]becktionary, 2010-01-08 08:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-08 08:56 am UTC

[info]shadowmonkey
2010-01-08 10:43 am UTC (link)
"So long and thanks for all the fiche."?
Strange use of the shortened form of microfiche, or complete idiot with no idea of the pop culture origin of a well known phrase?

You decide!

Off topic: The tags are giving me the impression that (at least) one of the mods has just spent the holiday period locked in a confined space with relatives who think "poo" and "bum" are an outrageous use of language.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 11:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowmonkey, 2010-01-08 12:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2010-01-08 08:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 09:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowmonkey, 2010-01-08 10:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-08 10:12 pm UTC


Page 4 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map