STUDY ARCHIVE
Main Page
EARLY CHURCH
Ambrose
Ambrose, Pseudo
Andreas
Arethas
Aphrahat
Athanasius
Augustine
Barnabus
BarSerapion
Baruch, Pseudo
Bede
Chrysostom
Chrysostom, Pseudo
Clement, Alexandria
Clement, Rome
Clement, Pseudo
Cyprian
Ephraem
Epiphanes
Eusebius
Gregory
Hegesippus
Hippolytus
Ignatius
Irenaeus
Isidore
James
Jerome
King Jesus
Apostle John
Lactantius
Luke
Mark
Justin Martyr
Mathetes
Matthew
Melito
Oecumenius
Origen
Apostle Paul
Apostle Peter
Maurus Rabanus
Remigius
"Solomon"
Severus
St.
Symeon
Tertullian
Theophylact
Victorinus
HISTORICAL PRETERISM
(Minor Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 or Revelation
in Past)
Joseph Addison
Oswald T. Allis Thomas Aquinas
Karl Auberlen
Augustine
Albert Barnes
Karl Barth
G.K. Beale Beasley-Murray
John Bengel
Wilhelm Bousset
John A. Broadus
David Brown
"Haddington Brown"
F.F. Bruce
Augustin Calmut
John Calvin
B.H. Carroll
Johannes Cocceius
Vern Crisler
Thomas Dekker
Wilhelm De Wette
Philip Doddridge
Isaak Dorner
Dutch Annotators
Alfred Edersheim
Jonathan Edwards
E.B.
Elliott
Heinrich Ewald Patrick Fairbairn
Js. Farquharson
A.R. Fausset
Robert Fleming
Hermann Gebhardt
Geneva Bible
Charles Homer Giblin
John Gill
William Gilpin
W.B. Godbey
Ezra Gould
Hank Hanegraaff
Hengstenberg Matthew Henry
G.A. Henty
George Holford
Johann von Hug
William Hurte
J, F, and Brown
B.W. Johnson
John Jortin
Benjamin Keach
K.F. Keil
Henry Kett
Richard Knatchbull Johann Lange
Cornelius Lapide
Nathaniel Lardner
Jean Le Clerc
Peter Leithart
Jack P. Lewis
Abiel Livermore
John Locke
Martin Luther
James MacDonald
James MacKnight
Dave MacPherson
Keith Mathison
Philip Mauro
Thomas Manton
Heinrich Meyer
J.D. Michaelis
Johann Neander
Sir Isaac Newton
Thomas Newton
Stafford North
Dr. John Owen
Blaise Pascal
William W. Patton
Arthur Pink
Thomas Pyle
Maurus Rabanus
St. Remigius
Anne Rice
Kim Riddlebarger
J.C. Robertson
Edward Robinson
Andrew Sandlin
Johann Schabalie
Philip Schaff
Thomas Scott
C.J. Seraiah
Daniel Smith
Dr. John
Smith
C.H. Spurgeon Rudolph E. Stier
A.H. Strong St. Symeon
Theophylact
Friedrich Tholuck
George Townsend
James Ussher
Wm. Warburton
Benjamin Warfield
Noah Webster
John Wesley
B.F. Westcott William Whiston
Herman Witsius
N.T. Wright
John Wycliffe
Richard Wynne
C.F.J. Zullig
MODERN PRETERISTS
(Major Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 or Revelation
in Past)
Firmin Abauzit
Jay Adams
Luis Alcazar
Greg Bahnsen
Beausobre, L'Enfant
Jacques Bousset
John L. Bray
David Brewster
Dr. John Brown
Thomas Brown
Newcombe Cappe
David Chilton
Adam Clarke
Henry Cowles
Ephraim Currier
R.W. Dale
Gary DeMar
P.S. Desprez
Johann Eichhorn
Heneage Elsley
F.W. Farrar
Samuel Frost
Kenneth Gentry
Steve Gregg
Hugo Grotius
Francis X. Gumerlock
Henry Hammond
Hampden-Cook
Friedrich Hartwig
Adolph Hausrath
Thomas
Hayne
J.G. Herder
Timothy Kenrick
J. Marcellus Kik
Samuel Lee
Peter Leithart
John Lightfoot
Benjamin Marshall
F.D. Maurice
Marion Morris
Ovid Need, Jr
Wm. Newcombe
N.A. Nisbett
Gary North
Randall Otto
Zachary Pearce
Andrew Perriman
Beilby Porteus
Ernst Renan
Gregory Sharpe
Fr. Spadafora
R.C. Sproul
Moses Stuart
Milton S. Terry
Herbert
Thorndike
C. Vanderwaal
Foy Wallace
Israel P.
Warren Chas Wellbeloved
J.J. Wetstein
Richard Weymouth
Daniel Whitby
George Wilkins
E.P. Woodward
FUTURISTS
(Virtually No Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 & Revelation in 1st
C. - Types Only ; Also Included are "Higher Critics" Not Associated With Any
Particular Eschatology)
Henry Alford
G.C. Berkower
Alan Patrick Boyd
John Bradford
Wm.
Burkitt
George Caird
Conybeare/ Howson
John Crossan
John N. Darby
C.H. Dodd E.B. Elliott
G.S.
Faber
Jerry Falwell
Charles G. Finney
J.P. Green Sr.
Murray Harris
Thomas Ice
Benjamin Jowett John N.D. Kelly
Hal Lindsey
John MacArthur
William Miller
Robert Mounce Eduard Reuss
J.A.T. Robinson
George Rosenmuller
D.S. Russell
George Sandison
C.I. Scofield
Dr. John Smith
Norman Snaith
"Televangelists" Thomas Torrance
Jack/Rex VanImpe
John Walvoord
Quakers :
George Fox |
Margaret Fell (Fox) |
Isaac Penington
PRETERIST UNIVERSALISM |
MODERN PRETERISM |
PRETERIST IDEALISM
|
|
Johann Gottfried Eichhorn
(1752-1827)
Succeeded
Michaelis (Johann David)
as Professor at Göttingen in 1788 / Referred to as an Idealist by
Reuss
Free Online Books:
Introduction to the Old Testament - A Fragment of
Eichorn's Einleitung in das Alte Testament
(Leipzig, 1780–1783 PDF) /
Johann Gottfried Eichhorn
(German Student of
J.D. Michaelis)
An Account of the Life
and Writings of John David Michaelis (1835 PDF)
Die hebräischen Propheten |
Allgemeine Geschichte der Cultur und Litteratur
des neueren Europa |
Geschichte der Drey letzten Jahrhunderte
|
Google Books |
History of New Testament Research: Michaelis /
Grotius /
Lightfoot /
Whitby /
Locke /
Eichhorn
Dividing Line Between Destruction of Jerusalem and General
Judgment - Matthew 25:14
WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID
Johann Peter Lange
"VII. Historico-Critical and
Rationalistic Period. Fundamental Tone or Key-note:
Predominant Volatilizing of Apocalyptic Eschatology ; especially the
Prophecy of the Millennial Kingdom ; amid a constantly gaining
confounding of such Prophecy with Chiliasm.
The motive or inciting cause of the period which we are at present
examining—a motive whose sketching by Lucke is not distinguished for
clearness—was, negatively, that system of criticism which maintained
that the Apocalypse consisted of purely supernatural predictions of
Church History and church-historical numbers ; and which applied such
exegesis to the support of chiliastic extravagances. Positively, it was
the felt need of a firm historical and psychological basis for the
prophetic glimpses of futurity. The errors of this new critical bent
were the issue, in part, of the delight which was occasioned by the
novel historical stand-point— historical, it was believed, for the first
time in a true sense. For the rest, these errors proceeded from doubt as
to the Spirit of Prophecy, as to the authenticity of the Apocalypse, as
to the demonic forms of the kingdom of darkness, and as to the reality
of Biblical Eschatology.
According to Lucke, Abauzit of Geneva inaugurated this tendency in his
Essai sur l' Apocalypse. "The Revelation, written probably under Nero,
is nothing—according to its own profession—but une extension de la
prophetic du Sauveur sur la ruine de l' Etat Judaique." The German
Wetstein was guilty of a curtailing and stinting of the Apocalypse,
similar to that attempted by the French Swiss. According to Wetstein,
Gog and Magog made their appearance in the rebellion instigated by
Barcochba. Harenberg took sides with Abauzit, submitting, however, that
the last four chapters of the Apocalypse are eschatological. He believed
the Book to have been originally written in Hebrew. Semler thought that
the true original spirit of the Apocalypse was Jewish chiliastic
fanaticism.
On the common basis of a one-sided criticism, Herder formed an
antithesis to Semler in this question as in other and more general
respects. The contrast is exhibited in his work entitled: Maran-atha,
das buch von der Zukunft des Herrn, des Neuen Testaments Siegel. [Maran-atha;
the Book of the Coming of the Lord: the Seal of the New Testament.] The
historical perspective of this book is, like that of Abauzit, barren and
contracted in the extreme: it consists of Jerusalem and the Jewish war.
The formal treatment of the Apocalyptic theme, on the contrary, is
enthusiastic, full of idealization, and appreciation of the figurative
language of the Orient (see Lucke's commendation). Herder called the
Apocalypse : "A picture-book, setting forth the rise, the visible
existence, and the future of Christ's Kingdom in figures and similitudes
of His first Coming, to terrify and to console." Hartwig, though the
disciple of Herder, abandoned the Oriental view for the Greek, holding,
with Paraeus, that the Apocalypse was a drama. This dramatical view was
subsequently fully carried out by Eichhorn. Others, taking a more
general, poetical view of the Apocalypse, made metrical versions of it;
of these the chief were those of Schreiber and Munter, and one by a
follower of Bengel, Ludwig von Pfeil.
The interpretation already advanced
by many, according to which the Apocalypse depicted the downfall of
Judaism and heathenism, and the tranquility and glory of the Kingdom of
Christ, re-appeared in the writings of Herrenschneider (Tentamen
Apocalypseos). Johannsen, in his Offenbarung Johannes, set
forth a similar view. Thoroughly novel and original, at variance both
with the ancient Church-historical and the modern synchrono-historical
view, is the book which appeared under the title of Briefe uber die
Offenbarung Johannis. Ein Buch fur die Starken, die schwach
heissen, Leipzig, 1784. [Letters on the Revelation of John. A
Book for the Strong, who are called Weak]. "The [anonymous] author
interprets all specials as generals, relative to the laws, arrangements
and developments of nature and of the human life in general; amid, and
according to, which laws, arrangements, and developments, God's Kingdom
on earth shall one day be perfected." Kleuker maintained once more the
eschatological signification of the Revelation (Ueber Ursprung und
Zweck, etc. [On the Origin and Design, etc.]). On the other
hand, Lucke mentions as followers of the bent of Herder and Eichhorn,
Lange, Von Hagen, Lindemann Matthai, Von Heinrichs (p. 1055)." (A
Commentary on the Holy Scriptures pp. 68-69)
J. Murray (1863)
"Alcasar,
a Spanish Jesuit, taking a hint from
Victorinus,
seems to have been the first (AD 1614) to have suggested that the
Apocalyptic prophecies did not extend further than to the overthrow of
Paganism by
Constantine. This
view, with variations by
Grotius,
is taken up and expounded by
Bossuet,
Calmet, De Sacy, Eichhorn, Hug, Herder, Ewald,
Moses Stuart,
Davidson. The general view of the school is that the Apocalypse described
the triumph of Christianity over Judaism in the first, and over Heathenism
in the third century." (A Dictionary of the Bible)
Christine
Reeve
"My Father acquired a
knowledge of the German language during his travels in the country in
1815-16. He translated some of the minor poems of Schiller in 1823.
Later, his attention was directed to German Theology, and finding there
was no English version of Eichorn's6
Introduction to the Study of the Old Testament,' he set to work to
make one. For this purpose he studied Hebrew and Arabic; with Greek he
was well acquainted.
But he gave up the task when he had translated a
portion of the work, and he took no steps for printing even this. Now,
in his ninety-eighth year, he has asked me to have the fragment printed.
The translation was made from an early edition of Eichorn's works.
From my ignorance of the languages of antiquity, it
is not within my competence to do more than to correct the proofs of the
translation. I regret that circumstances ^ prevent my calling in further
help than has been kindly afforded by the printer.
The progress of Biblical criticism in the last
hundred years is so great that Eichorn's 4
Introduction to the Study of the Old Testament' may be of inferior
interest to the works of later writers, but
Eichorn was a pioneer in the field of Biblical Criticism. His writings
are distinguished by moderation, ingenuity, sound learning, and common
sense. They may therefore still be read with interest and advantage, and
their value is not altogether lost, in spite of the long period of time
which has elapsed since they were first published. CHRISTINE G.
J. REEVE. 62 Rutland Gate:
December 1888. (Introduction to Tilly's Eichorn)
Benjamin
Warfield (1)
The Preterist, which holds that all, or nearly all, the prophecies of
the book were fulfilled in the early Christian ages, either in the history
of the Jewish race up to A.D. 70, or in that of Pagan Rome up to the
fourth or fifth century. With Hentensius and Salmeron as
forerunners, the Jesuit Alcasar (1614) was the father of this school.
To it belong Grotius, Bossuet, Hammond, LeClerc, Wetstein, Eichhorn, Herder,
Hartwig, Koppe, Hug, Heinrichs, Ewald, De Wette, Bleek, Reuss,
Reville, Renan, Desprez, S. Davidson, Stuart, Lucke, Dusterdieck, Maurice,
Farrar, etc. " (Revelation)
What do YOU think ?
Submit Your Comments For Posting Here
Comment Box Disabled For Security
|