Web design is (finally!) dying of irrelevance. Web pages themselves are no longer the center of the Internet experience, which is why designers need to move on to the next challenges—products and ecosystems—if they want to stay relevant.

Web design has no future—a risky statement I know, but this article explains why it has no future and what we, as designers, can do about it. As a discipline, web design has already exhausted its possibilities, an emerging combination of tech and cultural trends highlight the need for a broader approach.

Let’s start with the symptoms of this inminent death.

Symptom 1: Commoditization by Templates

Most of the content that you see on the web today is run by some framework or service—WordPress, Blogger, Drupal, you name it. Frameworks provide you a foundation and shortcuts so you spend less time struggling with the creation of a web site, and more time creating content.

As a consequence of the ubiquity of these frameworks, a whole world of free and paid templates lets you get started with a professional-looking design in minutes. Why hire a web designer if you can achieve a fairly acceptable design for a fraction of the cost using a template? Actually, many web designers (especially the ones on the cheaper side) just pick a pre-made template and make some minor branding customizations.

Either way, if your web page is a standard, informational one, there’s probably a template out there that can do the job for you.

Symptom 2: Web Design Patterns are Mature

What is the latest web design innovation you can point a finger on? Responsive design? That’s digital ages old. Parallax? Useless eye-candy. The web has had all the user interface components and patterns you might need for a while now (and no, parallax is not something we really ever needed). And that’s why you don’t see much innovation in web patterns as of late.

This maturity is good for users: they will find consistency in their daily use of the web. Checkout forms, shopping carts, and login pages should all behave in a similar way. Trying to get creative at this point will probably be pointless or even harmful.

Symptom 3: Automation and Artificial Intelligence are Already Doing the Job

There’s a new trend of automated web design services, arguably started by The Grid. It’s a service to build basic websites which makes design decisions—semantic ones—based on artificial intelligence. It analyzes your content to detect the best layouts, colors, fonts, and extra imagery for your site. Using cleverly chosen design basics (made by humans) as the foundation, it’s hard to go wrong with it, and the result will probably be better than what an average web designer can do.

When something can be successfully automated, it means that its practices and standards are established enough as not to need much human input. And this is obviously the beginning. There will be a fierce competition about which service can deliver better designs, faster, and with less human intervention.

Symptom 4: Facebook Pages as the New Small-Business Homepage

In the late 1990’s, future-minded businesses would buy their .com’s, purchase expensive hosting plans, and hire a “web master” in order to have The Web Page, the one that would make them visible to the rest of the Internet. By 2005, creating a site in Blogger or WordPress.com was more than enough for your new wedding photo business (it was also quick and free).

Today, this function has been completely overridden by Facebook pages. They are free, made to be viral out of the box, offer powerful tools only available to big businesses a decade ago (like subscription for updates or media posting), and are as easy to set up as your own profile page. They are so efficient in making a business visible that they are rendering basic web pages useless.

Symptom 5: Mobile is Killing the Web

How often do you visit a web site from your mobile device by directly typing the address? Only when you don’t have the app, right? People don’t seem to think much in terms of web pages these days: they think of digital brands, which mostly translate to apps or subscriptions (likes, follows, etc). That’s why most big websites, blogs, and portals are pushing their mobile apps to you—out of home screen, out of mind.

Mobile web has always been slow and cumbersome. Typing addresses is weird. Navigating between tabs is weird. Our underpowered mobile devices and saturated data networks don’t help create a smooth web experience like the one we have in our desktop machines.

As vital as responsive web design is (not adopting it is commiting digital suicide), it only guarantees that your user can view your page in a mobile device, if she ever finds it in first place. And the limited space in her mind is already mostly occupied by apps.

The Rise of Web Services and the Content that Finds You

The truth is, we need fewer web pages, not more of them. There are already too many competing for our attention and assuming selfishly that we have all the time in the world to close pop-up ads, explore navigational hierarchies, and be dazzled by transitions, intros, and effects.

But what really matters is not how you arrange things on a page: it’s the content, in terms of a specific user need. That’s why Google is starting to display actual content in some search results, without you having to visit another page. Just an example: if you Google a nearby restaurant from your mobile device, the search results include a button to directly call the place. You don’t even need to visit the page. The page designer’s ego and the visits-counter may suffer a bit, but ultimately the user experience is improved.

As a discipline, web design has already exhausted its possibilities

Things are moving in the direction of digital assistants like Siri, and especially Google Now with the new changes announced for Android M: they aim to provide you the exact bit of information you need, when you need it. This implies a shift from web pages to web services: self-sufficient bits of information that can be combined to other services to deliver value. So if you are looking for a restaurant, you get the reviews from Foursquare or Yelp, the directions from Google Maps and the traffic conditions from Waze.

Even more: we are transitioning to a push-based model of content consumption, where the right information arrives without you even requesting it. Google Now, for instance, warns you of how early you should depart in order to arrive on time to your meeting. All of this is already happening thanks to APIs—interfaces that let other services interact with your data. In this world, web pages are not required at all.

This is not to say that web pages will die—they will be around for a long time, because they are —and will continue to be— useful for certain purposes. But there’s nothing interesting there for designers anymore. They are a commodity and a medium, no longer the default state for digital products and businesses.

Web pages are static content that need to be found and visited (pull-based). But in the emerging push-based paradigm, the content finds you. Through data obtained from your context, your activity, and even your biometrics, content and tools will smartly present themselves to you when you are most likely to need them.

That’s the big thing about the new breed of smartwatches: they obtain data from your body and show you proactively tiny bits of information for your brain to chew on. Computer technology is already making big steps in order to dissapear from your sight.

Where does this leave us?

Web Design is Dead, Long Live UX Design

Here’s the good news: designers are really far from being obsolete. Quite to the contrary, you can see that the demand for UX designers is still on the rise, and everyone seems to be redesigning their digital products these days.

This switch from web design to experience design is directly caused by the shift from web pages to digital products, tools, and ecosystems. Web pages are just part of something much bigger: mobile apps, API’s, social media presence, search engine optimization, customer service channels, and physical locations all inform the experience a user has with a brand, product, or service. Pretending that you can run a business or deliver value just by taking care of the web channel is naïve at best and harmful at worst.

And all these touchpoints need to be designed, planned, and managed. This is a job that will continue to exist, regardless of the channel. We will still need cohesive experiences and valuable content across smart climatizers, virtual reality devices, electronic contact lenses, and whatever we invent in the decades to come.

In fact, as technology fades into the background, all we can see is the value transmitted by it. The designers who want to stay in business need to be experts in managing content and value across channels.

It’s time for us to grow up, because we have been part of the problem: we have helped to give birth to self-righteous web pages that assume they deserve to be watched and awarded just for the time we invested in crafting them. Now more than ever, in a world flooded with cognitive noise, the world needs simple, intelligent, integrated ecosystems of information. The sooner designers embrace this need, the better prepared we’ll be for the future.

Image of dewy cobweb courtesy Shutterstock.

Article No. 1 244 | May 27, 2014
Article No. 1 191 | February 19, 2014
Article No. 1 286 | August 6, 2014

Add new comment

Comments

Great article and I totally agree. about 4-5 years ago I made the decision to move from web design to software / app UX design for these same reasons and haven't looked back. I recently needed to find a tradesperson to do a job for me, the first place I asked was my local town group on Facebook, didn't even bother using Google.

I wonder where all those wonderful pre-made templates come from? Oh, yeah... from the extinct web designers. 

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

You seem to be drawing a somewhat pedantic line between ui/design and ux. Great design has never been "decorating randomly placed crap." As the famous quote by Steve Jobs goes "Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works."

 

Lograste lo que querias, un articulo con malas reacciones, nada mas mira tu twitter  @shesho "Ha sacado ronchas el artículo." Como si tu objetivo primordial fuese el de generar malestar y polemica, ya alegraste a tia chocha y al primo luis, y tu abuelito jorge, por que escribiste algo en un magazine, te falta perspectiva en otras cosas y campos relacionados, eres pedante y debes aceptarlo. Si quieres avanzar en UX Design tambien debes ser humilde y entender Diseño por si solo, y humildad mas que todo, te lo digo por tu bien nada mas que si quieres dejar una buena impresion esta no es la manera, si alguien viera tu stream del twitter se decepciona de tanta mente cerrada y biased. BTW soy UX Designer, Web Designer y me apasionan ambos campos  y el futuro esta en manos de gene con mente mas abierta y con opiniones mas certeras, menos excluyentes y una vision de union en los campos.

 

Como dicen: "bad publicity is better than no publicity" 

Bye: Señor Ego

esss asii mismo, igual soy UI UX designer y el se fue a otro extremo plantillas prediseñadas, robots jejejejej primero quien hace plantillas si no es los y que "extintos" web designers jejejeje un texto que hice:

jajajaj ahí esta el detalle. y el rediseño de una pagina web la hara solo alguien que sepa de manejo de contenido, o tendra que tener experiencia en UI??? o ¿lo hará un robot? junto con el manejo de versiones, preprocesadores para cambios futuros rapidos, optimizacion, efectos visuales, la total y completa adapatacion de una pagina hecha a la medida para un cliente. creo que ahora es mas nuestro momento porque antes con una pagina web llegabamos solo a un cliente con una plantilla ahora tenemos muchas mas opciones desde ofrecer plantillas prediseñadas por nosotros hasta trabajos complejos que esten a la medida del cliente. (disculpen mi ingles soy latino), y hasta simple con decir que el diseño web va de la mano con lo gráfico no creo que un robot me pueda hacer efectos en fotos, svg, etc, etc. (solicitadas a medida por cliente). aunque si creo que hay que prestarle mucha atencion a la usabilidad UX, es como crear un carro va desde la parte interna, enfocado en el usuario, hasta afuera que se realiza el diseño exterior del carro. "this is our time lets do it"

Edit: I Will never trust anything that comes erom a website that uses carrousel AND bad stock pictures. AND Word verification, this site is a joke.

I dont trust anything from a website that uses carrousel.

The golden rule that comes from this kind of idiotic statements is this is "X is dead, long live X", Magazines are dead, long live Magazines, Print is dead, long live Print, Blogs are dead, long live Blogs, etc etc, apply this to everything.

By the way you should see more "websites" I almost stopped reading where you mention Facebook as if is still relevant, a lot of things are happening besides Facebook, you're so naive, kid. I will bookmark this and laugh in 15 years. PS: Fake Vintage Filters on Pictures, those are dead kid.

Reading through some comments, I can see many who are threatened to the point of seeming hostile. however, having been a web designer since 1995, I knew of this trems starting in 2005-2006, as those in the know knew CMS frameworks would take out all need for severe customization of design, and mobile technology would take over. And it's true. It has to be pointed out that 99% web/mobile sites out there all have a similar look/feel and functionality. Telling me the placement of a text field here and there is not much of a deviation. At this stage, we need proper holographic UI design to create any feasible sense of unique and inovative design. But for now: it's the content that matters, as how it's  always has been the case. Users want familiarity with navigation and functionality 

Oh look a pedantic opinion from x person on internet!!! what the world needs!

Are you serious? This is total clickbait. I found zero insight in this article about your title.

 

Since when did UX apply to static sites? You're right, those are dead. But web design overall? Products? Services? Dang you are pretty oblivious on this topic.

For more tools and products than can you help to build a web site, e-commerce site, the web design isn't only design, includes a many other aptitudes and abilities, than the itself job needs. The design patterns can telling you a history it support the user can interact but the persons, calls normal person isn't have and idea about it, also the web design is design based in a branding, the most of companies hiring designers because they need the designer adapt their branding to the website,even apart the tool or rules like you mention.

Regards.

That's why is WEB design which I argue it's dead, not design itself, not even design that uses Web as a medium. Branding, content, interaction, all of them exceed Web design itself and are more required than ever, now that Web design is so commoditized. So this is an opportunity to think what really means being a designer in these days.

Cheers!

You seem to be forgetting... the web isn't all small businesses. There are companies out there that have hundreds of people working on their websites. These companies will not use the Grid or WordPress because no off the shelf package will ever be able to do the job of an intelligent, experienced web designer. 

Must disagree on almost every point made here. This is by no means a "new" article. You can go back to 2010 and find similar UX people waxing poetic about the death throes of web design.

 

Did you know the great designers of today are very well versed in Architecture, Persona Development, User experience, and Human Centered Design techniques. Simply stating anyone can just get a template is a little bit arrogant and misses the key points of...

"Is this template Accessible or Compliant?"

"Do I need to create additional functionality beyond this basic template?"

"Is this the same template others in my field are using?"

"is simply stuffing in a few modules or plugins going to allow my site to remain secure for the long term?"

"Do I support it?"

"Am I going to have to force my users to bend to the pre-made plugins functions or should I design ones that actually work for the end user?"

 

These are all design questions.

 

Sure, Facebook is a great way for small businesses to reach out and communicate to their audience, but generally it's mostly used as a method of broadcasting outward & most interaction is usually completely one sided. Posts will almost inevitably fall directly into the dreaded internet vaccuum unless they are willing to pay to promote those posts, and what then? "Here's our facebook post for something we're selling, if you want to learn more or perchance go buy it..." Where do you go? You can't exactly offer sales or transactions off of Facebook, so at it's best for small businesses, it's a clumsy CRM tool. Small businesses need a presence beyond just broadcasting. ( I can't imagine your twitter feed if this is truly your belief. )

 

The "everyone needs an app because using a website on a phone is a terrible user experience" argument is nonsense and backwards too. You know who needs apps? "Apps need apps" websites do not, at least not all the time.

 

Isn't making a user who may just want your phone number or address to make contact with you, who you've forced to download "an app" a pretty shit user experience? Do you like getting to a website for the first time and being asked to do their survey?  Well this is worse.

 

I think the argument you should be making, is as UX people we need to stop relying on Templates, Automation, and cramming Users into the same one size fits all bucket. Maybe as UX people we should learn more about design, just like the great web designers of today have been learning and honing their UX chops and creating tools you're all currently enjoying.

 

In the end No, design isn't going anyplace, this methodology you've described is a recipe for stifling innovation & advancement in a theatre that's really only barely a over a decade and change old.

 

We have to keep growing as creators of content, design, experiences, and we cannot start on this path of thinking The UX people can just go it alone.

“The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had.”

― Eric Schmidt

I'm so glad you've figured it out Sergio.

It's funny, because in the article actually I agree with every point you make. The thing is: content does not equate with Web. It's content the thing that needs atention and craft, not the Web as a self-justified medium. But you already pointed in that direction too.

Cheers,Sergio

durp

I would agree with the notion that "Web Design" as know is on the decline and that UX designers are a wanted commodity. However I think that DESIGN on the web is dead and that creativity has disappeared. Every agency website you see these days has the same layoput, font and navigation, themeforrest template etc. It is sad that we let the frameworks dicate how we should design.

I don't point the finger at frameworks if they suit a specific need well. Creativity is best applied to content and branding, rather than a new way of presenting a text paragraph. The sad thing is using frameworks as shortcuts to not thinking properly of the user and their needs.

That's your opinion Sergio, but I do not think web design is dead or dying. I think being a webdesigner is a phase and that you'll eventually mature into a UX designer (assuming you're passionate with Design).

Here's what I think about your article. Respectfully, I think you're title is a bit too much for what you are actually trying to say. It's misleading. But I must say, you did an impressive job pissing off other web designers. I saw this from a facebook share btw. so again, web design is not dead and you absolutely cannot declare it's death. next time please choose your words wisely. 

cheers,

Michael