Stewart is editor at BigEye.com and NewsWatch.org

Stewart grew up on his family's farm located in NE Ohio's Summit County. In the middle of his last high-school year he asked his parents to give their permission for him to enroll, as a 17 year-old minor, in the US Naval Air Reserves "weekend warrior" O-2 training program at the Akron, Ohio Naval Air Station.

He graduated near the top of Hudson Township's 1951 class of forty-seven students. After spending part of that summer on active training duty, he commuted from home to Kent State University and to NAS Akron. The following summer his Navy Squadron flew an east coast logistical air wing based at Norfolk, VA Naval Air Station. He has fond memories of flying at 17 - 20 years of age in these Navy propeller-driven airplanes: PBY, SNJ, SNB, TBM, and R4D.

The Navy enabled him to transfer to Ohio State University and occupied his time again throughout the following summer. By December of 1955, at which time he earned his Bachelor of Science degree, the war in Korea had ended. More importantly for him, education and developing personal convictions precluded him from pursuing a military career.

He went to work within a few days of graduation, with a "Q" Security Clearance from the Atomic Energy Commission, in a laboratory at Battelle Memorial Institute, within walking distance of the college. An avid reader, by 1960 he no longer considered an academic or military career, nor a lifetime spent working in the confines of a laboratory. He took a job in Ohio with Lever Brothers Company, a large consumer products marketing firm that offered a two-year in-field sales-training program. After the two years he was promoted and transferred to New York City where he eventually participated in the introduction of new products.

He resigned from Lever after six years to triple his income, switching from marketing consumer products to industrial sales. By 1968 he had become one of the nation's top producing truck-body salesmen, selling to major truck-rental companies. After learning the techniques of successful distributor marketing, he moved on to become regional sales manager of a company for a couple of years and then the general sales manager of a division of a publicly traded company. He drove the business into a profitable position within his first full quarter's accounting period.

In 1976 he decided to go into business for himself and to return to his mid-western roots. In the course of a year he built an early Century-21 real estate franchise into the SE Ohio region's leading office in all areas: recruiting, listings, sales, and profit. Bored with that business, he began to study the way that personal financial products were marketed, especially "savings-type" or "money-back" life-insurance. These were financial contracts that he could never fully comprehend.

After sending away for The Consumers Union Guide to Life Insurance and reading it carefully, it became obvious to him that accurate information was needed from other than the industry's trained salesmen and their clever General Agents.

He then studied several books on the subject, including Norman F. Dacey's What's Wrong with Your Life Insurance, G. Scott Reynolds' The Mortality Merchants, the classic chapter #13 on life-insurance in Venita Van Caspel's Money Dynamics, and Randal A. Hendricks definitive study, "A Legal Analysis of the Sale of Life Insurance", [The Houston Law Review 810 (1969)].

He decided to recruit and train a marketing organization that would accurately inform consumers, enabling them to make financial decisions in the interest of their families rather than in those of already financially bloated life-insurance companies.

He met and joined forces with a couple of older highly successful and experienced sales executives, the men who introduced the marketing of mutual funds to the American public. Together, over the next several years, he worked with the progressive insurance companies for which they designed products his own company marketed.

In 1980 he wrote and self-published Financial Recovery. Advertised in full-page ads in "Life Insurance Selling" magazine, where it received a favorable review, thousands of copies were bought by individual agents and agencies across America where it helped to create substantial industry changes.

From 1980 to 1985 he built, owned, and managed a company that became one of the top volume diversified brokerage agencies in America, marketing selected financial products nationally, including tax-deferred single-premium annuities before the tax-law was changed from FIFO to LIFO effective Aug. 14, 1982, and selling attractive unregistered tax-sheltered investments before the IRS eliminated them with TEFRA. Before the personal computer age, he struggled to learn how to program the TI-59 in order to provide responsible agents throughout the country a means of calculating and presenting replicable and accountable financial product analyses for their clients at the point of sale.

He made the stupid mistake by entering politics. A couple of friends and Stewart picked a slate of state-wide candidates after helping the new Libertarian Party gain Ohio ballot access. He ran for the Ohio Senate, campaigning on rejection of the state income tax, repeal of the federal income tax, and audit of the Federal Reserve System. He put a sign on the back of his motorcycle's seat that read, "Stop the Federal Income Tax". It got a lot of approving honks. In retrospect, he realizes how politically naive he was at the time. He did relatively well at the polls but unexpectedly generated personally destructive and formidable enemies.

His brilliant younger brother Bob, a PhD geologist living in Florida, had for years been encouraging him to move south. In January 1986, during a particularly cold Ohio winter, he relocated to Sarasota, Florida, a community which he loves today as much as he did the first day he found it. He hopes to live peacefully there to age 100 among interesting neighbors. He is best contacted as Stewart in www.emailclub.com

View Latest Posts >>>

Simon Shack’s September Clues

Americans have traveled a long way from a home that was established for them by a handful of brilliant men less than two hundred and fifty years ago. These men struggled together despite major disagreements in order to secure a form of government never before seen among men except paradoxically in the soon to be decimated Iroquois confederacy.

Among these brilliant men was Thomas Jefferson, arguably the brightest as well as the most contradictory and enigmatic. Today we cling to his writings and yearn for freedoms and rights for mankind that he found in his prodigious reading and that he expressed in letters and early Virginia political writings. Those ideas became encoded in the new government’s founding documents.

Located on the continent’s eastern edge, Jefferson’s compatriots were men of property. Emerging Western social philosophies provided ample rationalization to set up a nominally classless system whereby the unexplored new continent would be exploited in such a manner as to yield them and their progeny substantially increased wealth.

The majority of newcomers for more than a century would be slaves, sometimes euphemistically itemized as indentured servants, black slaves from Africa, impoverished immigrants, females and other workers. Non-emancipated and non-propertied non-homesteaders would be vote-less in the new Republic. The founders and certain others would own property that others would work. Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose, and the only thing that has changed today is the breed of our owners.

Man’s nature evolved to meet needs of a progressively rational, civilized and urbanized animal. Encoded attributes advantageous to individual struggles for survival constitute our inherited nature. Survival demands self interest in conjunction with participation in actions undertaken by one’s kin, tribe, clan, or islanders. The will to power and greed are both hard-wired to some degree. However, when those characteristics dominate after individual needs are met effectively we may rightfully define resulting behavior as sociopathic. Such persons own tags of money and power.

As a businessman Jefferson was an abysmal failure. A case can be made for Jefferson not sharing the strong personal vested interests of his compatriots. Monticello was auctioned off following his death but his true legacy is incalculable. Thomas Jefferson’s ghost looms above our Republic’s present guardians. They abhor the sentiments of Jefferson and his mentor, George Mason, that found their way into our Constitution’s Bill of Rights. Above all, they detest our First Amendment’s provision that “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech …”.

Existing power targets individuals who become significant enough to threaten its positions. It has been that way since Socrates and since the Inquisition. Today we can name examples: Kennedy, King, Wellstone, Zundel, and many others. Look carefully at those who are derided by propagandists who own, manage and control America’s press, TV channels, and Hollywood and who conspire to censor the Internet. They insist that certain persons whom they label “idiots” be ignored. This brings us directly to a man who calls himself Simon Shack.

While others debate instrumental questions about 9/11, the watershed event of our age, few address the huge fundamental issue raised by Shack and his associates in Clues Forum. That methodical six year analysis of 9/11 obliges us to face squarely the possibility of sweeping media complicity. If Simon Shack is correct his analysis proves that we live today in a world of corporately crafted fantasy, a pathological world of hoaxes and fears and wars and lies controlled by persons owning tags of money and power.

Unlimited anti-social greed and mendacity of banks and other corporations, the hubs of modern economic society in a world controlled by their media cartel, lie at the very heart of Shack’s revelations. Should that key issue be documented and publicly exposed, the structure of such a world would need to be denounced and overturned. Exposing their methods would not necessarily remove them. It would definitely oblige them to be more accountable to the rest of the human race. Today, unfortunately, they conclude that Simon Shack must be discredited no matter how much it costs.

All mankind thrives better in a world of truth, compassion, peace, cooperation, and love. Simon Shack’s work, which I considered to be preposterous at first glance, requires serious consideration. Reading hundreds of pages of analysis can be daunting. An outline or 9/11 Tour Guide representing six years work can be found online.

If one enters into Google just 3 keywords: 911 MEDIA HOAX, it does appear that the 911 cat is out of the bag. Pay close attention to those persons who are trivialized, smeared, and muzzled and you will find those most feared by the powers of the world in which we live.


Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on January 22, 2014, With 0 Reads, Filed under 9/11. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

12 Responses to "Simon Shack’s September Clues"

  1. Raptor  February 14, 2014 at 5:10 am

    I echo much of the above mine is also absent. so be it A recent development over at Shack’s clues forum. Seems the dude who is President of the Academy of Television Art’s and Sciences……is none other than the reporter on scene as Twin no. 2 collapsed….everyone should take a look at this…..very interesting.


    • Stewart Ogilby  February 14, 2014 at 6:38 am

      Thanks, Raptor. To help out viewers, I make a little URL http //tinyurl.com/lgyrv93

      The 9/11 cat is indeed out of the bag. OMG! You never questioned the powers that be when they had you hiding under your desk during A-Bomb (or was it H-Bomb) drills following the launch of Sputnik, did you? The naughty Russians were out to get us, remember? Hey, have you seen the photos of the platform from which their Soyez rocket supposedly launched the thing? Oh well, it did give our guardians an excuse to revamp and centralize the US educational system. We had to “catch up”, of course. Thank you again, Mr. Simon Shack.

    • Stewart Ogilby  February 14, 2014 at 6:47 am

      Ummmm. A first,, tunyurl suddenly not working. Oh well, go to cluesforum.info and dig around for Simon’s postings this month. Start copying and pasting URLS and links to this VT article and columns throughout the internet. The perps will be delighted when people learn that they were not mass murderers. There is no statute of limitations on murder, let alone mass murder.

  2. LC  February 2, 2014 at 9:34 am

    Thanks Mr. Ogilby:
    I watched beginnings of Shack’s film which reminded me that I had seen it years back. Which confirmed the video fakeries that Ace Baker had elaborated in his documentary which Dimitri Khalezov had linked here on VT & I re-linked many times afterwards. That video has been deleted from YOUTUBE!!! Which means he was right.

    Today I found this one which shows how easy any version of plane-hitting WTC could be faked:

    YOUTUBE:::: “9/11 No Plane Theory – 3d Specialists, Movie Makers and Ugly Americans”

    +++ Yesterday I found that and Iran C-130 had flown into a flimsy residential high-rise last year and fallen outside it in pieces. I hadn’t heard about it!!! Obviously they had kept if very quiet but instead to blow the 9/11 hoax the Iranians could provide good coverage & analysis of the C-130 impact + damages + the plane’s pieces on the ground to prove that a plane can’t penetrate even a flimsy building much less the WTC buildings which were built like impenetrable mountains as I wrote in Jim Fetzer’s Simon Shack page yesterday addressing Mr. Lawson. & the Iran plane is here again:

    Youbute:::: “911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.”

  3. andytyme  January 27, 2014 at 10:32 pm

    As I post this comment, it’s been nearly six days since the Ogilby essay was published… and there are only SEVEN comments??? What happened, did the virtual army of paid Shack-attackers get some well-deserved time off for R&R after all their hard work in recent weeks? Maybe there was a power outage or server crash at the mil-intel facility that houses their plushly upholstered bank of cubicles, but you’d think their bosses were so flush with taxpayer cash that they could have afforded SOME backup tech and redundancy. 😉

  4. Stewart Ogilby  January 24, 2014 at 2:00 pm

    I agree wholeheartedly. The problem lies with the ability of our countrymen to recognize what probably comes from what Simon likes to call “The Nutwork”. Take, for example, the exchange here in the social media comments with one Mr. Nicademus Lawman. Is this a real person with such a name? The Nutwork targets the masses and cares little about those, far fewer in number, who exercise critical thought. The 9/11 hoax provides an outstanding opportunity for social scientists to study methods that have molded modern human society and to judge the pros and cons of their results if chosing which side to support.

  5. pshea  January 23, 2014 at 7:09 am

    it is necessary to question everything stewart, even and especially the true natures, motivations and supporters/backers of those who have been handed down for all to revere as ‘founding father’s’ or the legal documents they produced for the benefit of all IT’S citizens! (any ‘barack Hussein Obama’s’ around back then?)
    all things legal are all things dead. if you are/represent a person/citizen with a birth certificate, you are legally a dead entity. the Vatican and their phoenician (phoeny-cian) law are all over everywhere, and have been for ever so long.
    over living and lawful flesh and blood human beings do these corrupt systems have no power. we had better learn to stand in our own ground/truth, no?
    what’s in a word? well, everything!

  6. stephanaugust  January 22, 2014 at 8:54 pm

    “If one enters into Google just 3 keywords: 911 MEDIA HOAX, it does appear that the 911 cat is out of the bag.”

    Forgetting everything about 911 for a minute, the most important aspect is, that the 911 hoax can not be allowed to be revealed, because this would cause a domino effect in the media.

    • mpennery  January 23, 2014 at 1:36 am

      The problem with accepting the truth of 9/11 goes far beyond the facts. If it was just the facts, it would be an easy sell. But, to accept the truth, people must admit to themselves their government, media and other institutions would so blatantly lie to them. If they can do that with 9/11, they can do that with anything. So, the 9/11 hoax cannot be allowed to be revealed because this could potentially overturn all the other hoaxes in our society: Our false history, our contrived reality, our medical cartel of disease and profit, etc., etc. The powers expect us to totally buy in to the complete version of fake reality but it is getting harder and harder to maintain the illusion. I’m in the camp that thinks we need a complete overhaul, top to bottom. Strip it bare and start over.

    • pshea  January 23, 2014 at 6:52 am

      what if that was exactly the idea of 9/11 (ritual/hoax that it was); to wake us from our slumber,
      strip it bare and start over in remembrance of who and what we truly were/are?

      are we ready yet? I think so. (speaking for myself (and my universe) of course!)

    • stephanaugust  January 23, 2014 at 9:56 am

      David Icke (or Alex Jones, if the need arises and if it must be and if it cannot be helped) should do regular street interviews in malls, asking the people if they believe the official truth. I would bet any money that the majotity still believes what the talking heads are, um, reporting.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login