- Fake 911 Victim
By Stewart Ogilby
For several years I have, among others, been doing my best to figure out what did and didn’t happen on 911. I found myself fooled in fundamental areas over years of puzzlement.
Only recently have I been able to discard the lies and visual deceit presented on television of that day’s events. Deliberate deceptions, along with well-meaning analyses of televised fakery, can be found in books, magazines, and on thousands of internet web sites.
If there is anything that the 911 hoax tells us, it is to be cautious when viewing dramas and illusions on television that pass for “news” in America, including those created by computer software, including datafakes, computer-simulated individuals complete with backgrounds created by personna software programs. The art of digital animation to present a faked reality becomes more sophisticated year by year. By 2001 it, along with facial morphing software, had progressed far enough to fool us all, for a time at least.
The official 911 narrative and its perpetrators’ control of dissent, the “truth movements”, is a paradigm for the extent to which modern media is able to control public perception and mold public opinion. So-called “911 truth” sites and organizations are now overwhelmingly controlled and provide platforms for disinformation. Their discussions are framed around diversions to continue confusing well-meaning persons who seem unable to handle massive deceit, including manufactured data from “official” sources upon which they have been conditioned to rely.
Given the huge sums of money and corporate support behind the 911 hoax, it may be understandable that the exposures of Mr. Shack and his helpers appear, at first glance, to be preposterous. To begin grasping the simple but terrifying methods whereby top moguls in Hollywood, banking, US media, and huge corporations were able to fool the world and promote war, as they have done repeatedly in the past, it is mandatory for one to spend enough time at septemberclues.info and at cluesforum.info to overcome initial emotional reaction.
“News” is scripted as to events, characters, and conflicts, for purposes of public manipulation and social engineering. It is important to understand that the motive of those who control international banking, Hollywood movies, newspapers, and television networks is to keep the masses of humanity confused and fearful in order to wage war, promoting their own financial and geo-political agenda. Another motive for breaking news is to divert attention from important real events, particulary those involving political dissent.
Whenever there is an absence of credible independent journalists and data is limited to “official” sources let us be particularly skeptical and not rush to conclusions or to judgment when presented with dramatic “events” by corporate media. This does not imply America’s news from its six huge corporate sources to be consistently untrue. Where is it written that liars must be consistent?
Millions of persons will persist in believing the bazarre TV stories of Arab hijackers, commercial airliners crashing, buildings blowing up from the top down, and a multitude of “truther” explanations surrounding unproved mystifying illusions created by Hollywood-style special effects fakery and well-paid actors, an illusory mask for the demolition of a group of antiquated buildings in downtown New York City. Tying the media hoax in with an international political agenda of warfare, combined with the domestic enactment of abuses, starting with the Patriot Act, was ingenious.
I do not expect a great awakening of the masses. Even those led grudgingly to suspect that a mass murder of 3000 souls never occurred on 911 are likely to simply shrug their shoulders and move on to something less upsetting and less confusing for them. When the reality of the source of the immense 911 hoax that continues to be perpetrated becomes more widely understood by those who make an unprejudiced effort and eventually grasp it, the real truth found will be far more terrifying than they ever imagined.
Related Posts:
Posted by Stewart Ogilby on April 13, 2012, With 5024 Reads Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
FaceBook Comments
15 Responses to "Media Insiders Created 911 Terror In USA"
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
Listen Live 
Enter Moguls Murdoch and Milchan, the “Media Insiders” of 9-11… (back door please…) Here is a prime example of the enormous “power of suggestion” in what is now more widely known as “predictive programming”-
Christopher Bollyn writes- “The pilot episode of the The Lone Gunmen television series in which a passenger airliner is remotely hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center was filmed in 2000 and aired on television six months before 9/11, on Fox TV in March 2001. The amazingly uncanny similarity of this television show with the events of 9/11 intrigued me and led to my discovery that a senior Israeli intelligence agent named Arnon Milchan was very closely connected with Fox TV, the company that produced the program”-
-“In 2001 Milchan had long been connected to both Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corp. and its many subsidiaries, and to Gerald Levin, president and CEO of Time Warner and CNN. The success of the Israeli-produced false-flag terror spectacle was critically dependent on the major news media pushing the official, but unproven, explanation and ignoring the many unanswered questions about what really happened. As the highest-level Israeli intelligence agent in the United States, Milchan certainly seemed to be “Mossad’s Man in the Middle”, co-ordinating the 9/11 cover up with the two largest news media outlets in the United States”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3WW6eoLcLI
http://www.bollyn.com/arnon-milchan-mr-israel-and-911/
Stewart – you have written a superb article once again. It is so sad – but also so true. Here we are having to dig to get to the bottom of this catastrophic event ourselves because our ‘governments’ have been so comprehensively subverted, inverted and harnessed to the great lie machine.
Just as Hoover once said – it is a lie so monstrous that ordinary Americans simply cannot comprehend the depth and sheer malevolence of it. The saying that ‘The devil hides the biggest lies among a thousand truths’ still holds true today. This is how they hide lies by issuing them in between weather forecasts and genuine facts and information. I do suspect, however, that the ‘lie element’ is coming more often nowadays and being spewed out thick and fast as the enemy control every corner of our lives.
Genuine proof of culpability presents itself in many different ways – some of them quite unexpected. For instance – any REAL government intelligence service would infiltrate ‘truther’ movements in order to find out what important additional facts or information they might have found – NOT in order to divert them and lead them down a blind alley. That, I suspect, in itself exposes the true mindset of the authorities.
In Britain 15 years ago the Blair government set out to deliberately change the face of Britain by importing millions of people from the third world – whilst at the same time pretending that they were actually trying to stop it. They did this at the behest of the international bankers to whom Blair had already mortgaged his soul. Blair knew that this move would be incredibly unpopular with the British people – but after all – our wishes as voters actually count for nothing of course. Eventually it all came out from loose lipped civil servants of the time. The proof was compounded by the fact that they KNEW VERY WELL that inviting millions of people from lands where murder, rape, robbery, vote rigging and every form of serious crime was commonplace – would cause massive crime and mayhem on our streets. It then became clear that the government had put procedures in place to disguise, confuse and mis-report crime figures so as to actually hide their treasonous actions. Looking after the health, safety and well being of the people is the first responsibility of a government. Deliberately exposing them to danger and involving them in illegal wars against sovereign countries to please foreign bankers – is high treason – punishable with the death penalty.
If you look at the preparations made prior to 9/11 I highly suspect that there will be plenty of official record that was well aware of that terrible impending event.
Britain is going to be destroyed by massive and harmful immigration – with its indigenous people discriminated against and absorbed by mass-miscegenation – and this is on the direct orders of the jewish international bankers. It completes the final part of the PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION blueprint. Anyone who has visited Britain in years gone by might be shocked by this youtube clip. It shows what has happened to our once green and pleasant land:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hKEd6rzbeg
Interesting also is the surprise and disappointment of the young lady making the film. No doubt a former lefty who can’t understand why the wonderful ‘multi-cultural society’ sold to her subliminally by jewish and marxist media moguls – did not turn out to be the Nirvana – as promised!
jeannonkralj – With all respect to you, I must protest. Should anyone tell me that he murdered another human being, or that someone else murdered a certain human being, the burden of proof lies with the claimant. The latter must “flesh out” the victim as a start, then submit proof evidencing murder. It is as impossible to prove the negative in this matter, i.e., the non-existence of a purported named individual, as it is to totally disprove the existence of aliens within our solar system, the existence of various gods, or even of Santa Claus, for that matter. The proof lies with the narrator if he expects to make his case. The presumption that no deaths occurred as a result of the events illustrated on television on 911 is a working hypothesis awaiting such evidence. I would be delighted to have you provide proof of the death of a real human being on 911 and Mr. Shack would be most interested in such evidence. It is unfortunate that you feel Shack or Hoi-Poloi was impolite to you. Awaiting proof, not merely opinion or belief, let me thank you for your comment.
If no real people died in the demolition of the three buildings, then no real people were inside the buildings when they were demolished.
We are left with several possible explanations:
1) The buildings were not Low Occupancy; they were No Occupancy. The buildings had no tenants.
or
2) All of the people who worked in the building were told, prior to 9/11, not to show up for work on that date, and nobody did.
or
3) People arrived for work, and they were blocked from entering the buildings.
or
4) Everyone was evacuated prior to the demolitions.
Can anyone offer any other alternative(s)?
Since my first attempt to post a reply seems to have disappeared from the “awaiting moderation” queue, I will post a shorter version here, which probably will also not be posted.
Sorry, Mr. Ogilby, but your reply is not right. The primary burden of proof is on Simon Shack and Hoi Pilloi. I can think of many reasons why they avoid meeting that burden of proof and that is certainly their right, but they are the ones who came out with the initial assertions and it is my right and has been the exercised right of many others to express doubts about some of those assertions.
One of their main questionable assertions was that there were absolutely no real people who were victims in the Towers, however, I do not think that assertion was stated in the original Vicsims pdf file. Many people, far better researches of 9-11 truth than I, questioned that assertion, though they, like me were very open to the thesis of VicSims as set out in the paper.
I am not guilty of any “sweeping generalizations” and if Killtown’s forum records were available, they would show that I and many other truth seekers on that forum, were asking Mr. Shack and Hoi Pilloi from the beginning to meet the “burden of proof” that was clearly on them. That particular claim that there were no real people killed in the Towers was the main problem all of us had but when many people, including me, asked questions to them, or as you claim, made our “sweeping generalizations, we were met with extreme rudeness.
If and when there is one place where ALL information is cataloged and published with rules for documentation, I may participate in researching some individual names given, but certainly not at your inappropriate challenge.
You, Mr. Ogilby, now seem to be making that same questionable assertion that Simon Shack and Hoi Pilloi made, that is with your own added features. You say “submit names of a handful of “victims” that appear on 911 Memorials that you feel represent formerly living persons”. You have just committed one or two logical fallacies. I will just object to one in that phrase of yours, “that you feel”. I am not about “feeling[s]”; I am about seeking as much founded truth as is possible and in an orderly documented way.
jeannonkralj – Thank you for the comment. I can’t refrain from observing its rambling nature – as if you really don’t know what to believe. That is the beginning of wisdom in this matter. You cite names, and in the real world doing so involves a premise of existence. Not so in 911-land! Please submit names of a handful of “victims” that appear on 911 Memorials that you feel represent formerly living persons rather than sweepingly speculate on Mr. Shack’s competency. You are welcome to pick one or two who “lived” in your area and do your own research. It should not take long. Interview the surviving family. More than a decade ought to have softened their bereavement enough to gladly share with you memories of their lost loved one. Verify persons from county tax rolls and real-estate appraisals. Get last known address of the unfortunate 911 victim, birth data, etc. Send me or Mr. Shack your findings. Happy hunting.
The photo in the article of “Honor Elizabeth Wainio” is unfortunately not explained at all in the article.
Here is a link that talks about it more
http://www.cluesforum.info/search.php?keywords=Wainio&sid=7e6f0460ceca9645b249b407fdfd37e2
Not sure what the assertion of CluesForum is though. Is Elizabeth said to be a made-up person who never extisted or Elizabeth said to be a real person that no one can find out from contacting relatives and friends was actually killed? I do not know the difference in the two photos that is alleged because obviously there is no difference.
This photo of this person is an example of the big gaping holes in the investigations of indivduals related to the VicSims.
Here is an interesting video portraying many of the more well known family members of “victims”
as actors who go around to speaking engagements and interviews and always putting on the same weep show.
911 ACTORS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE&feature=player_embedded
Unfortunately there are head photos of almost all of the top 9-11 alternative media reporters and the implication is that they are actors too, and James Fetzer is shown among those photos. I do not believe Dr. Fetzer is an actor. Dr. Fetzer has not generally discussed this “vicsims” matter but is aware that a very large majority of those said to be killed have not claimed government free money in either the SS Death Index or the victims compensation fund.
I do know I have always had a hard time accepting all this faked victims thing, but I think when we get good photoshopped evidence of made-up victims and enough dead-ends when searching out friends of the victim, we could have a good solid case for the big Hollywood production hypothesis.
Right now there is no one place where all the investigations of individual “victims” is compiled. It is all hit or miss.
Mr. McIlvane really did have a son that he lost that day. Didn’t he. If his dad is just a paid actor but really is his dad, we would have to go to friends of the son for more information and perhaps who are not paid actors. An if the son had a wife and children, those people would have to be sought out and interviewed.
There must be a list of all the people on each of the four flights, as well a list of the names of those “lost” in each WTC Tower. Then we need to try to determine which ones we have solid info on as to real family members and people who knew the victim.
There were some people killed in the towers. Supposedly a woman named “Edna Cintron” and those who jumped from the towers.
I think the number we find can actually be verified tp a strong and reasonable degree of certainty to have been killed will end up being very small in comparison to the purported number of those killed.
I remember several years ago Shack’s Vicsim report came out and several people on a certain now defunct but great forum tried to research individuals said to have died in the Towers. They were online data investigations only but all of them, of about 20 individuals, had stark anomalies even in those cursory investigations.
Hoi Pilloi and Simon Shack were rude and combative when they first put out their Visim pdf report on that forum. Shack lives in Italy and “hoi Pilloi” lives in Europe too as I remember correctly.
Mr Hemelberg; what was the nature of the attack on you.?..I’ve considered mailing articles to congressmen too..but know it would largely be a waste of time..and, now according to you, dangerous.
Mr. Ogilby, in a previous column, you recommended at two-book set on the Jews and Germany:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01/31/911-urban-renewal-with-a-twist/
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060928786/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=0060190434&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=05FATC0KE9JQZ8RA99N7
I just got through reading ‘The Greatest Hoax of the 20th Century’, ‘The Leuchter Report’, and ‘The Rudolph Report.’ Now, I do not think a single person was executed with gas by the Nazis.
Many years ago, I read ‘Hitler’s Willing Executioners’, to try to understand how the most cultured people on the earth — who gave us great music, great philosophy, great science, great industry, great math — could have done what they did. The book did not resonate with me. Now I know why.
I now believe that, like 9/11 and Apollo, the Holocaust is a big fraud.
These events all tie in with the narrative written by Douglas Reed in ‘The Controversy of Zion.’ What a magnificent book.
His theme is that a Money Mafia created Judaism 3,000 years ago, and has used Jews ever since for its crass ends.
All of the major historical events, with lots of Jews tied to them in directing roles — French Revolution, Bolshevik Revolution, Federal Reserve creation, conduct of WWI and WWII — makes sense to me in that light.
It makes for a very trying life for the majority of Jews who are entirely innocent — but brainwashed to unquestioningly support public puppet Jews and Israel — it seems to me.
Looks like you now are on the right track. 911 was a Hollywood horror movie on TV, where not even an animal was hurt. People are as naive as Little Red Riding Hood. Thank you for your report.
I feel honored by Mr. Simon Shack’s posting of this column in his CluesForum at http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2368428#p2368428
I again encourage 911 researchers and others to discover the work of that unassuming and rational man.
If you are curious regarding the reference to Bianca Jagger in the comment above, go to the following link and scroll halfway down http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=246&p=2367770&hilit=Bianca+Jagger#p2367770
Thanks, Mr. Ogilby, for your column.
I forgot where I learned of ‘SeptemberClues’ a few months ago; it could have been from you.
I find the evidence from the site to be really powerful and convincing, that 9/11 was just like Apollo — a staged, theatrical production, designed to fool hundreds of millions.
It makes sense to me, that it was a theatrical production, and not an actual sacrificial killing of 3,000 innocents; as crooked as Rudy Giuliani is, I doubt that he would want the blood of 2,700 New Yorkers on his hands.
The simultaneous video footage from the five separate networks — of the 12 minutes before the second plane crash — is absolutely convincing to me, that the coverage was directed from a single, central TV studio.
The creation of a simulated victim based on Bianca Jagger is hilarious.
Thanks for helping spread the word on that important site, sir!
Interesting interview for those who have never seen with Ehud Barak on the BBC just hours after 911 happened on September 11th, 2001. Now I don’t know what integral part he had in the staged event, but I can see someone who is in the know of what the pretext of 911 would do for Israel for the next 10-20 years when I hear it. He even goes as far to say who was responsible before anything was even established. Remember who this guy was just before 911.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAueLjdKh1s
9/11 was an Inside Job and a “Psy-Op”
http://www.911nwo.com/911INSIDE%20JOB.html