The Washington Post

Cruz takes the gloves off, attacking Rubio on immigration


Sen. Ted Cruz accused Sen. Marco Rubio of not paying enough attention to border security in the United States. (Mark Kauzlarich/Reuters)

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) — who has spent the past few weeks taking oblique swipes at Senate colleague and presidential rival Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) — was sharply critical Thursday, blasting Rubio for his support of a failed immigration reform bill that would have granted a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.

The Texas senator told conservative radio host Laura Ingraham that Rubio had opposed adding provisions to the bill that would have strengthened border security.

“He opposed every single one of them. Every single amendment,” said Cruz, who had introduced some of those amendments. “It’s not like people were quiet in sharing their concerns at the time. It’s not like one had to engage . . . it’s not like this was rocket science.”

Rubio pushed back on those claims Thursday, saying the bill had the correct security components but was waylaid by voter mistrust — and arguing that he and Cruz shared “almost all the same views on immigration.”

“Ted is a supporter of legalizing people that are in this country illegally,” Rubio said after a campaign stop in South Carolina. “In fact, when the Senate bill was proposed, he proposed giving them work permits. He’s also supported a massive expansion of the green cards. He’s supported a massive expansion of the [H-1B] program, a 500 percent increase.”

“Ted is a supporter of legalizing people that are in this country illegally,” Marco Rubio said after a campaign stop Thursday in South Carolina. (Josh Mitelman/The Island Packet via AP)

Cruz and Rubio have both gained momentum in the presidential race in the past month after standout debate performances. Over that time, Cruz has slowly tried to highlight policy differences between the two, drawing contrasts between them even as he rarely mentioned Rubio by name.

During Tuesday night’s debate, Cruz made an unprompted call for an end to sugar subsidies, calling them “corporate welfare.” Rubio has aggressively supported the subsidies. Cruz has made veiled references to Rubio’s spotty Senate voting record and his support for the immigration bill.

There have been more pointed references, such as when Cruz knocked Rubio on trade and called the Florida senator a “moderate,” a subtle dig at a candidate who came into office as a Tea Party darling.

But on Thursday Cruz took the gloves off in response to Ingraham’s questions, which were pointedly about Rubio and the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” coalition that introduced the immigration bill.

“The Gang of Eight, all eight of them, agreed to vote against every amendment that would strengthen the bill from an enforcement perspective,” Cruz said. “The Gang of Eight voted as a gang against enforcing and securing the border.”

At a Chamber of Commerce summit in Hilton Head, S.C., Rubio offered a defense of the 2013 “Gang of Eight” bill.

“I was involved in an effort in 2013 to try to fix our immigration issue,” Rubio said, in response to a friendly question about how immigration policies affected agriculture. “There was a powerful lesson from 2013. The American people do not trust the federal government to enforce our immigration policies. That exists even if you pass a law that says we’re going to build more walls, we’re going to have e-verify, we’re going to have an entry/exit tracking system. That was a shocking realization.”

Rubio did not blame the collapse of the process on the 2014 migrant crisis or President Obama’s executive orders, but he quickly did so in a press conference after the event.

“It’s going to be impossible to move forward until you can prove to people that illegal immigration is under control,” said Rubio. “If you can prove that it’s under control, I honestly believe it opens up the ability to make these changes.”

Asked about Cruz’s charges, Rubio said that the immigration reforms needed after border security was addressed did not amount to “amnesty.” He did not discuss any ways that foreign-born workers who entered the United States illegally could become citizens, only how some could earn 10-year work permits. And he argued that “every candidate on [the debate] stage” favored some sort of legalization for workers now in the country illegally — including Cruz.

“If you look at it, I don’t believe our positions are dramatically different,” said Rubio.

Katie Zezima is a national political correspondent covering the 2016 presidential election. She previously served as a White House correspondent for The Post.
David Weigel is a national political correspondent covering the 2016 election and ideological movements.

politics

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

86
Comments
86
Show Comments
Most Read

politics

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.