Articles

Media Coverage

Press Releases

Events

Newsletters

Videos

   
   

Contact Us

 
Please be advised that your submission does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please click here to read the full disclaimer.
 
 
 

Media Coverage

Phila. Lawyers Secure $31 Million N.J. Jury Award (The Legal Intelligencer)

October 20, 2008

Feldman Shepherd The Legal Intelligencer Phila. Lawyers Secure $31 Million N.J. Jury Award

By Amaris Elliott-Engel

John Dodig - Feldman Shpherd - Philadelphia Personal Injury AttorneyPhiladelphia lawyers secured a more than $31 million verdict Friday in Camden County Superior Court for an 18-year-old client who lost his leg following a car accident on a road they said the county had failed to maintain.

An eight-member jury awarded plaintiff Nicholas Anderson $15 million in future medical costs, $15 million in past and future pain and suffering, disability and loss of enjoyment of life and $1,295,007.57 in past medical costs, finding the Camden County government liable, attorneys for Anderson said.

Judge John A. Fratto presided over the case.Jason Daria - Feldman Shepherd - Philadelphia Personal Injury Attorney

Anderson, then 18, was driving on Raritan Avenue near the intersection of Third Street in Atco, Camden County, Dec. 23, 2004, before his accident, according to the complaint in Anderson v. County of Camden. Anderson's accident resulted in his left leg being amputated and serious injuries to his left arm and right leg, according to a police report attached to the complaint.

Anderson's four-door Subaru went onto the roadway's shoulder, where there was a drop-off between the asphalt part of the shoulder and the adjacent dirt and gravel, the complaint said.

Plaintiff contended that because of the drop-off Anderson lost control of his vehicle and crashed into a guardrail that the county allegedly failed to take care of, according to the complaint.

Plaintiffs attorney John M. Dodig of Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter Tanner Weinstock & Dodig said in an interview that a vehicle was coming in the opposite lane of travel and caused Anderson to swerve onto the shoulder.

"It was our position that the pavement edge drop and a dangerous guardrail caused Nick's injuries," Dodig said. "It was our position that the county of Camden knew for 20 years about the dangerous condition of the guardrail and did nothing about it."

According to the police report, Anderson could not be interviewed at the time of his accident because of his condition. The report said it appeared that Anderson lost control of his vehicle, slid off the roadway and crashed into a guardrail on the south side of the road. Anderson's vehicle came to rest in a ditch, the report said.

Co-counsel Jason A. Daria, also of Feldman Shepherd, did half the work of the case, Dodig said.

Camden County was represented by Assistant County Counsel Donna M. Whiteside.

"We are certainly aware of and deeply sympathetic to Mr. Anderson because of the injuries he suffered," Ken Shuttleworth, director of public affairs, said in a statement. "However, a verdict such as this would impose a serious burden on county taxpayers. The county therefore intends to seek all appropriate legal remedies including appeal."

"We believe we have appropriate insurance to protect the interest of taxpayers," Ron Tomasello, with Camden County's Public Affairs office, added later.

The county has a self-insured retention limit of $300,000 and an excess policy of $15 million, Dodig said.

The county offered its $300,000 retention limit, but the excess policy carrier didn't make an offer, Dodig said.

At this point, Dodig said that there is no high-low agreement.

According to the county's answer, the county "breached no duty owed to plaintiffs." The county also said in its answer it was either Anderson's negligence or the negligence of a third party that resulted in Anderson's accident. The county also argued that the New Jersey Tort Claims Act barred Anderson's cause of action.

The jury found that the road was dangerous because of the change in elevation between the road and the shoulder and because of a guardrail, according to the verdict sheet.

The jury also found that those dangerous road conditions created a foreseeable risk of injury to the plaintiff and that Camden County's failure to fix the road conditions was palpably unreasonable, according to the verdict sheet.

Dodig said they called county witnesses and cross-examined county witnesses to illuminate the Camden County policy of not fixing guardrails until they are upgraded during safety projects or until hit during accidents.

The county's defense theory was that the county did not have liability, that Anderson was contributorily negligent and that Anderson made up a story about the oncoming vehicle, Dodig said.

The jury deliberated for 2 1/2 hours following a two-week trial, Dodig said.

Anderson's past medical care totals $1.2 million, and his future life care plan is estimated at $8 million, Dodig said.

 

 

 

 
 
Although we do not intend this website to be advertising for our legal services, it may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions. We seek to comply with all laws and ethical rules of the jurisdictions where our offices are located, but cannot guarantee that this website meets local requirements throughout the United States. We do not seek to represent anyone based upon their viewing this website in a jurisdiction where this website does not conform to local requirements. This website is not an offer to perform legal services in any jurisdiction other than those in which we are licensed to practice, as set forth in the individual descriptions of our lawyers.

This website may contain references to various matters that have been handled by Feldman, Shepherd, Wohlgelernter, Tanner, Weinstock & Dodig LLP. The results portrayed in those matters were dependent upon the facts of those particular cases, and results will differ if based on different facts. Because every case is different, the descriptions of awards and cases previously handled are not intended to imply or guarantee success in other cases. This website may also contain references to past and present clients. Such references are not intended to be testimonials or endorsements of Feldman, Shepherd, Wohlgelernter, Tanner, Weinstock & Dodig LLP and they do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.

Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter Tanner Weinstock & Dodig, LLP attorneys are licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York and Texas. Our attorneys also sometimes practice in other states on a pro hac vice basis. Pro hac vice admission is when a lawyer not licensed in a particular state associates with a lawyer who is licensed in that state and obtains the court’s permission to jointly represent a client in a specific matter.
Please click here to read our full disclaimer language.
© Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter Tanner Weinstock & Dodig LLP         Attorney Advertising         Disclaimer         Privacy Policy         Site Map
Personal Injury | Medical Malpractice | Auto Defects | Forklift Accidents | Tire Defects | Cerebral Palsy | Construction Accidents | Crashworthiness | Spinal Injury | Product Liability | Car Fires | Air Bag Defects