House GOP and Democrats find that CENTCOM manipulated intel on the US fight against ISIS, contradicting internal analysis, in reports released this week.
Read MoreThe Brexit: How Will UK's Departure Affect NATO?
The UK is officially leaving the EU as a result of the Brexit referendum. What does this mean for NATO?
Read MoreThe U.S. and the Taliban: Offensive Support Is Now Fair Game
President Obama has approved the easing of restrictions in the U.S. fight against the Taliban.
Read MoreNATO vs. Russia: Is the U.S. Backpedaling?
The United States announced that it will only commit one battalion to the NATO mission against Russian influence in Eastern Europe, going against their previous promises to commit two battalions to the mission.
Read MorePakistan: Strifes in Politics, Human Rights, and Terror
Pakistan faces major issues in politics, terrorism, and human rights that claim hundreds of lives each year. As a key country in the region, its stability is vital, but has yet to be attained.
Read MoreTurkey: A Different Kind of Quagmire
Bombings and violence ramp up in Istanbul from Kurdish militants and terrorists, refugees are flowing over Turkey's borders, and President Erdogan is cracking down hard on dissent. A look into the different issues the country now faces.
Read MoreTIMELINE: Anti-Terror Raid in Brussels
Live updates from anti-terror raid in Molenbeek, Brussles.
Read MoreThe Islamic State in South East Asia: A Pervasive Phenomenon
The Islamic State and other Islamist groups are spreading in Southeast Asia, presenting a growing regional threat.
Read MoreTimeline: Bombing in Central Ankara
Timeline of live updates from the Ankara Bombing.
Read MoreThe US against Boko Haram: Tough Talk and Soft Blows
ISIS itself is also taking root in Africa, stationing itself in Libya and prompting serious talks of US intervention.
Read MoreThe Pressures and Possibility of U.S. Intervention in Libya
Further military intervention in Libya has been a serious consideration in Washington as the U.S. ramps up it's fight against ISIS.
Read MoreTimeline: Ships and 10 Navy personnel Held in Iran overnight
On Tuesday, it was first reported that two US Naval ships were held under Iranian custody, and that the crew of both ships would be returned "promptly."
Read MoreThe US in Afghanistan: Withdrawal is Wishful Thinking
In the hours preceding Christmas Eve, Afghan forces were able to fend off Taliban sieges in the Sangin District, killing a “Taliban commander and 50 fighters.” Nonetheless, the district, located in Afghanistan's strategic Helmand Province, could not have been rid of Taliban presence without US and British airstrikes and air support backing Afghan reinforcements.
Since this incident in the Sangin District, and since the recent deaths of six Americans in an attack just outside of Bagram Air Base, President Obama’s vow to significantly reduce the number of US troops in Afghanistan has again become a prominent component of US foreign policy--with 9,800 slated to stay in the region into most of 2016, and 5,500 to be deployed beyond the president’s departure from office.
U.S. Deputy Representative to the United Nations Michele Sison spoke at the Security Council on December 21st, reiterating the fact that while US forces will still be present, the primary focus is to establish Afghan forces to fight the Taliban.
“Our message to these forces is clear – there is only one path to peace, security, and stability in Afghanistan. And that path is not through military action – but through an Afghan-led reconciliation that builds upon the democratic and human rights gains the country has made since 2001. The Taliban’s attacks harm the Afghan people, destabilize the country, and betray the group’s disregard for the lives of the Afghan people. They must stop.”
Defense Secretary Ash Carter also echoed sentiments of US-Afghan partnership in a December 18 press conference in Jalalabad, despite this being the longest war in American history:
“[...] as groups like ISIL emerge on the battlefield, or al-Qaeda seeks to reestablish a safe haven, we must be prepared to deter their growth and counter the threats they pose. We will be prepared to do that. They can never have a secure base here in Nangarhar or anywhere else in Afghanistan.”
Even with 14 years of United States support and backing for Afghan forces, there are still gaps in areas like intelligence, special forces, logistics, aviation, and “ministerial development.”
Part of the difficulty in regions like Afghanistan is that the battlefields are “dynamic,” in the sense that there are many emerging and reemerging groups in different areas of the country. From a US foreign policy perspective, a dynamic field just makes it more troublesome to pursue a troop withdrawal. Rather than focusing on properly training and equipping Afghan forces to be self-sustaining, we see constant shifts in aid and forces that follow the movements of enemies within the country.
“From al-Qaeda and various different parts of the Taliban movement to groups like the IMU that have been around for a long time, [...] these groups are constantly reconstituting themselves, reorganizing themselves, and accordingly, they show different behaviors and different -- attention at different times, different parts of the Afghan geography,” said Carter. “Therefore, Minister Stanekzai and I were talking about this today, the Afghan security forces with our help are getting more and more agile.”
Despite the fact that the president promised to end the Afghan war in 2014, it is clear that due to recent events, new developments in terror, and the progress of the Afghan forces, a complete US troop withdrawal in the near future is nothing but wishful thinking.
US Special Forces Assist in Saving Hostages at the Request of KRG
Early this morning, US Special Forces supported a Iraqi Peshmerga operation to save hostages at an ISIS prison near Hawijah, Iraq. 69 hostages in total were rescued, including more than 20 members of the Iraqi Security Forces. Five ISIS members were detained by Iraqi forces, and a number of them were killed. The Pentagon also told reporters that the US gathered “important intelligence” on ISIS during the operation. One American soldier was killed, and three Directorate General of Counterterrorism personnel--part of the Kurdish Region Security Council (KRSC)--were injured. Initial reports of the operation reported that the hostages saved were Kurdish, but an official statement by the KRSC states that there were “no Kurds among the rescued hostages.”
A Pentagon press brief on the operation also underscored the fact that no Kurds were among the hostages that were rescued. Rather, most were Iraqi Arabs.