Pretty depressing… it will be used as a quasi-precedent by courts and leftists in Europe, too.

I didn’t even know until I Googled him, that Judge Gregory is black. Sooner or later, I might start Noticing Patterns…

Now this is depressing.

Well, step two is people beginning to ask how many tank battalions the judges have.

Unfortunately there are many intermediate steps before we get to your Number 2. All of them more and more depressing.

I don’t think we will ever fall off a cliff (that’s the only situation where I could see your #2 come in). I think it’s one long, slow slide……a shnide, if you will. We’re the frog in the pot.

If an Executive Order can be described as dripping with intolerance and animus, then this court order is dripping with contempt.

Screw the government! Here comes an Irish democracy!

We don’t have a Constitution any more. We have a rogue, out-of-control clique of elites in control of the government and they do whatever the hell they want. Domestic spying? Searches without warrants? Importation of foreign terrorists? Endless wars? Incomprehensible debt? Institutionalized anti-white discrimination?

All of that and more. Only fools think the courts are going to re-impose some kind of constitutional order upon the government. To the contrary, the courts are staffed by elites who are the very usurpers of constitutional power.

The people have been reduced to servants of an imperial occupation regime.

The soldiers in your streets are not your protectors.

They are the prison guards of your multicultural insane asylum. pic.twitter.com/vIs3EotHff

— Mr Darcy Esq. (@MrDarcyRevenge) May 24, 2017

Bottom line, oligarch power plus non Whites plus Nice White Ladies plus cucks equals mass Muslim migration.

Can’t stop it, no hope of that. Survival depends upon abandoning hopium for White Male Identity politics making enemies fear us greatly. Particularly Nice White Ladies our main enemy as they give power to non Whites.

Hitler’s Big Mistake was admitting he was the author of Mein Kampf. All he had to do was say, “These are the words of Zeus (pbuh) given to me by Divine Revelation,” and we would STILL be accepting Nazi refugees!

/Big Bill/

Fact is, Trump is contemptuous towards judiciary (not aware or unwilling to accept that it is a separate branch of the government) and the judiciary is paying back (may be with compound interest). As a bonus, for the Constitutional traditionalists, this trims the wings of presidency a bit and shifts the power over to Congress. If Trump had better advisers, they would have cautioned him against going the executive order route and go the traditional legislative way. That would have made it much harder for a any one district court to rule unconstitutional since there would be Congressional record to back it up. But Trump loves the drama of imperial fiat not realizing how shallow that proclamation is. Expect many more political defeats for the juvenile presidency.

For the answer, turn to comment 3 above.

http://www.unz.com/isteve/circuit-court-the-constitution-is-a-suicide-pact-after-all/#comment-1884742

Trump should have moved to crush the judiciary in January. He didn’t then–he isn’t now–he won’t in the future. He couldn’t/wouldn’t even do nothing and let the protected status of the Haitians lapse. If he loses at the Supreme Court (50-50 proposition for the reason cited in your post, but I’d add Roberts as a potential cuck) he’ll just say, “Oh, well, given the Constitution, my hands are tied.”

It’s interesting that the Ninth Circuit released its opinion only a few days after yet another Muslim-initiated terrorist atrocity. Their arrogance is colossal. We are so screwed. I’m hoping for California secession leading to U.S. dissolution–maybe some remaining portion can have reasonable immigration laws.

If there is a de facto Zeroeth Amendment, doesn’t this imply that the whole world is American, the Bill of Rights extends everywhere, etc?

And so we see that, in the end, Invade the World and Invite the World really are the same thing.

I am looking forward to UKIP asserting their Second Amendment rights.

“Team America, World Police” indeed.

In short: given that the national question had been abandoned into the hands of a 70 year-old celebrity with a keen sense of drama and public attention, but apparently no coherent philosophy, no appreciable attention span, no sense of discretion, and little if any administrative ability, it may just have never had a chance, and the battle was already lost a long time ago.

Brilliant summation! Chinese and Russian historians will debate when the West lost its battle for the next hundred years. (They’ll be the only places where such debate will be permitted.)

The Trump administration actually confirmed a judge two hours ago. More are coming: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Donald_Trump

You got that right…. sadly.

As you can see, many here think the highest form of allowable dissent is a pithy blog comment, even when the unelected mandarins decide bad think is punishable by imprisonment.

As I said before, pol is a greater barometer of the average mood of Trump voter than THE MOST IMPORTANT BLOG EVER’s commentariat, and they’re gearing up for WWIII.

The ruling talks of “an Executive Order that in text speaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination.”

“vague terms of national security”? I wonder how vague those terms seem to relatives of the 22 people who were killed in Manchester?

This truly makes me feel ill.

Since this description will be used increasingly in future, I suggest the abbreviation juvenile.

Let’s fill it out, analyze, and “unpack” it a little more then:

No coherent philosophy, no appreciable attention span, no sense of discretion, little if any administrative ability, and sufficiently narcissistic and lacking in proportion that the mere suggestion that anything (like a scurrilous whispering campaign about Russia) takes away from his “landslide victory” drives him into serious, unforced errors.

Liberals fear the far-right to a much greater degree than they fear Islamist terrorism.

The great project of our elites, the Kalergi Plan of demographic displacement, must not be allowed to be stopped by mere voters.

Neither the Declaration of Independence nor the federal constitution grants POTUS the authority to bar Abdul or Abu or Ali or Ibrahim or Mohammed or Mustafa from coming to America.

Neither the Declaration of Independence nor the federal constitution grants POTUS the authority to issue executive orders, in general, or specifically to bar Abdul or Abu or Ali or Ibrahim or Mohammed or Mustafa from coning to America.

If the rule of law is to mean anything, it must be upheld even when whitey yells and screams that if we don’t throw aside the rule of law brown skinned Islamists will kill us all. The problem is, whitey, long ago eagerly threw aside the rule of law so that he could have empire and all of the goodies that the warfare / welfare state has given him.

If Christians were claiming constitutional protection, I wonder how enthusiastic this Neo-stalinist would be for the First Amendment.

Listen up bigots, on average only 15-20% of Muslims support suicide bombing. That's only like 200,000,000 people world wide so shut up. pic.twitter.com/I5Dft0l6VY

— Tolerant Fellow (@nontolerantman) May 23, 2017

There is one thing and one thing only that pathetic mooks like Tiny Duck want and that one thing is ATTENTION!

Actually, I think that was McDowell’s, not McDonald’s.

Well there goes that old Canadian Border Proximity chestnut, now that Washington and anew York have succumbed.

The Justice’s irreparable harm will manifest itself in ways that he doesn’t anticipate.

I didn’t google him but I knew he was black by his writing. It’s quite emotive for a higher court judge. Thanks for confirming though.

Here’s your problem:

Amici Supporting Appellants,
INTERFAITH COALITION; COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES; T.A.;
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF
CALIFORNIA; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; STATE
OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF IOWA; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF
MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF NEW YORK;
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF OREGON; STATE OF RHODE
ISLAND; STATE OF VERMONT; STATE OF WASHINGTON; DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA; CITY OF CHICAGO; CITY OF LOS ANGELES; CITY OF NEW
YORK; CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; CITY COUNCIL OF NEW YORK;
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK; CITY OF AUSTIN; CITY OF
BOSTON; MARTIN J. WALSH, Mayor of Boston; TOWN OF CARRBORO;
JAMES A. DIOSSA, Mayor of Central Falls, Rhode Island; COOK COUTNY,
ILLINOIS; CITY OF GARY; CITY OF IOWA CITY; SVANTE L. MYRICK,
Mayor of Ithaca; CITY OF JERSEY CITY; CITY OF MADISON; CITY OF
MINNEAPOLIS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY; CITY OF NEW HAVEN; TONI
N. HARP, Mayor of New Haven; CITY OF OAKLAND; CITY OF PORTLAND;
CITY OF PROVIDENCE; JORGE O. ELORZA, Mayor of Providence; CITY OF
ST. LOUIS; CITY OF SAINT PAUL; CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO; COUNTY
OF SAN FRANCISCO; CITY OF SAN JOSE; SANTA CLARA COUNTY; CITY
OF SANTA MONICA; CITY OF SEATTLE; VILLAGE OF SKOKIE; CITY OF
SOUTH BEND; CITY OF TUCSON; CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD;
FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICIALS; MEMBERS OF THE
CLERGY; RIVERSIDE CHURCH IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK;
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE; BEND
THE ARC; A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE; SOUTHERN POVERTY
LAW CENTER; AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE;
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY; RODERICK & SOLANGE MACARTHUR
JUSTICE CENTER; HOWARD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW CIVIL
RIGHTS CLINIC; UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS & HIGHER EDUCATION
ASSOCIATIONS; INTERNATIONAL LAW SCHOLARS;
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS; ISMAIL ELSHIKH; ANTDEFAMATION
LEAGUE; JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUCLIC AFFAIRS;
UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM; CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN
RABBIS; WOMEN OF REFORM JUDAISM; AMERICAN BAR
ASSOCIATION; MUSLIM JUSTICE LEAGUE; MUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS
COUNCIL; ISLAMIC CIRCLE OF NORTH AMERICA; COUNCIL ON
AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS; ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING
JUSTICE-ASIAN LAW CAUCUS; NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE
3
CENTER; ASISTA; AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE; FUTURES
WITHOUT VIOLENCE; NORTH CAROLINA COALITION AGAINST
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES; MEMBERS OF
CONGRESS; SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION;
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE,COUNTY & MUNICIPAL
EMPLOYEES, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS; HISTORY
PROFESSORS & SCHOLARS; LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS
UNDER LAW; CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS; SOUTHERN
COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE; NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN
RIGHTS; JUDGE DAVID L. BAZELTON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH
LAW; CHICAGO LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER
LAW; MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE; WASHINGTON LAWYERS’
COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS; TECHNOLOGY
COMPANIES; FRED T. KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW & EQUALITY;
JAY HIRABAYASHI; HOLLY YASUI; KAREN KOREMATSU; CIVIL
RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS; NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATIONS OF COLOR;
FOUNDATION FOR THE CHILDREN OF IRAN; IRANIAN ALLIANCES
ACROSS BORDERS; MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP
COUNCIL; EPISCOPAL BISHOPS; IMMIGRATION LAW SCHOLARS &
CLINICIANS ON STATUTORY CLAIMS; FORMER FEDERAL
IMMIGRATION & HOMELAND SECURITY OFFICIALS;
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS; MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS;
ADVOCACY ORGANIZATIONS; INDIVIDUAL PHYSICIANS; TAHIRIH
JUSTICE CENTER; ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED
VIOLENCE; CASA DE ESPERANZA; NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
HOTLINE; INTERFAITH GROUP OF RELIGIOUS & INTERRELIGIOUS
ORGANIZATIONS; OXFAM AMERICA, INC.; CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
PROFESSORS; AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE; MUSLIM RIGHTS,
PROFESSIONAL & PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS; CATO
INSTITUTE; NATIONAL ASSIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN BAR
ASSOCIATION; ASSOCIATION OF ART MUSEUM DIRECTORS;
AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF MUSEUMS; COLLEGE ART ASSOCIATION; 94
ART MUSEUMS; AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL SOCIETY ON THE ABUSE
OF CHILDREN; ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS; ASIAN LAW
ALLIANCE; ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN NETWORK OF OREGON; CASA;
COMMUNITY REFUGEE & IMMIGRATION SERVICES; INTEGRATED
REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES; IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER OF
MINNESOTA; SOUTHEAST ASIA RESOURCE ACTION CENTER;
IMMIGRANT RIGHTS CLINIC OF WASHINGTON; SQUARE LEGAL
SERVICES, INC.; AIRPORT ATTORNEYS COALITION,
Amici Supporting Appellees.

Legislative action would have been shot down just as fast as executive order. Judges have decided they rule this country, and any decisions they make are backed by whatever thin rationalization gets the result they want. The judiciary has carried out a coup d’etat, and passing a law to block immigration would have just taken longer and then had the same result, judges would have overturned it.The question will eventually become does the nation allow itself to be ruled by unelected judges, plutocrats, professors and media mavens and if not, what’s the way out.

I don’t know why African Americans think that open borders and mass immigration will improve their social and economic standing … other than increasing the ever-growing demographic expressing an emotional disdain for Whites and Western Civilization.

Ironically, African Americans are now being increasingly fractionalized and marginalized by the social practices originally intended to elevate their social and economic status. As a negative correlation, there has been a new and growing tier of new arrivals acting to keep them in their place. African Americans remain at the bottom with a progressively decreasing chance of improving their social and economic standing with the White community.

African Americans are finding themselves being systematically pushed out of jobs, neighborhoods, and “gifting” opportunities (affirmative action) by the new immigrants. It’s all in the numbers. At one time, African Americans were the only recipients of affirmative action and racial/ethnic quotas. Then came the White feminists with their gender issues. Then came the tsunami of peoples from Asia, Mexico, Central America, MENA, the Caribbean, and, yes, sub-Saharan Africa with the same, all-embracing list of grievances against White society. There is only so much “gifting” that to go around before the quotas are filled and/or the entire edifice collapses.

As a measure of self-interest, one would think that African Americans would get smart and ally with Whites to close our borders to the foreign invaders.

10 work for the Empire, 3 for the Nation, and they voted accordingly.

Given the usual dominance of the Empire in the corridors of power, 3 out of 13 isn’t a bad start.

Amici? Given the undercurrents, Amigos could be a new Court term.

No they do not. Not every judge is a Supreme Court Justice and absolutely none of them are legislators.

“this trims the wings of presidency a bit and shifts the power over to Congress.”

No. Judge [sic] Gregory claims to be acting in the name of the Constitution, not Congress. Had Congress restricted immigration in a way he didn’t like, he would have overturned that too.

“That would have made it much harder for a any one district court to rule unconstitutional since there would be Congressional record to back it up.”

No. For same reason.

There have been only 7 cases where an immigration related law was ruled unconstitutional. Most recently, INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). Previous cases dealt with loss of Citizenship. It requires a lot of persuasion and political capital to get anything through Congress; but the results are firmer than an executive order. Look how hard it is to “repeal and replace” Obamacare. (I am quite confident there won’t be one in this administration). Heck, we haven’t passed a budget in ordinary manner in a while. (mostly continuing resolutions, sequestrations, Paygo etc., trickery).

The “rule of law” does NOT guarantee the Right of Entry to the United States to ONE brown-skinned invader from the land of vest-bombs and burkas. Nor does the Constitution exist to guarantee, hasten, and raise to the status of a frenzied religious principle the political and demographic dispossession of the Founding Fathers’ posterity.

You are claiming that the Constitution exists solely to punish “whitey” for existing and to ensure the complete replacement of “whitey” by alien people who hate the United States, all its freedoms, all its culture, and everything about it — that the purpose of the Constitution of the United States is to destroy the United States and ensure that the Constitution is replaced and consigned to the garbage heap of history by men of utterly foreign mind.

That is an insane viewpoint. A nation that exists solely for the purpose of abolishing itself? That’s like saying, say, that Japan exists for the sole purpose of importing enough Frenchmen to ensure that the Japanese language, culture, and race is replaced by the French, as quickly as possible.

What business is it of this judge how vague the wording is?

Hey, numbnuts, you don’t get to decide the level of specificity with which an executive order explains itself. That’s up to Congress and the president. If they only have vague notions, that’s their business. They can ban everyone who wears red hats if they want.

That’s the silliest thing about this. Trump doesn’t need to explicitly lay out the national security threat, though, come on, we all know what it is. It would require blindness of judicial proportions not to see the connection. But anyway, there’s no national security rationale necessary. He doesn’t need a rationale period. This is a pure policy decision. He could do it arbitrarily if he wants.

What’s going on with the judges is that they’re putting forth their policy preference by blocking Trump’s. That’s all there is to it. They do so first by inventing the right to immigrate on the basis of anti-Muslim discrimination. But also by inventing two standards:

1) for Trump to require some sort of rational basis on which to restrict immigration (national security in this case

2) for this rationale to be explained in executive orders in enough detail to satisfy the whims of judges.

They make these standards up willy-nilly, and ignore the ones they already made up just as willy-nilly. Rampant willy-nilliness.

Soldiers will not defend judges or their insane rulings

Yeah, the whole thing is about Trump’s incompetence, and the desire of a lot of America to want to cover for him.

This would have never happened under President Cruz or President Romney. But Trump is so isolated that he can sometimes make good decisions, he can never make good moves. He doesn’t have the crew to back them up.

I did a rough, back of the envelope calculation based on some figures from a recent article by Gavin about Muslim terrorism; I get about a 16,000-fold greater rate of actual Muslim terrorism to terrorism by white supremacists.

~3000 dead from Muslim terrorism in US since Muslims began coming here in significant numbers. 5 dead from white supremacists over same time period

80 million white males, 3 million Muslim males in US

600*26.67= 16,002

You could (and probably Corvinus or Nick Diaz will) play with the numbers a bit to shift them how they want, but no way to get to whitey is worse.

Yet, white supremacists (and anyone who shares the same skin color with them) are demonized by the left as the worst thing everTM in this country, and we are supposed to be awful deplorables if we don’t roll out the carpet for our Koran-toting friends. Its idiotic.

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2017/05/25/here-comes-the-constitutional-crisis-and-you-can-thank-a-shitlib-judge-for-bringing-it-on/#comment-880771

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s revised travel ban “speaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus and discrimination,” a federal appeals court said Thursday in ruling against the executive order targeting six Muslim-majority countries.

“Hi, yeah, this is the part where we can’t find any fault with the law as such, so we’re gonna talk about imaginary crap in our heads, like ‘Trump’s state of mind,’ and irrelevant crap, like ‘stuff Trump said on the campaign trail.’ Basically, Trump’s a racist, so any law or executive order he signs is racist, if we say it is.”

Where does the AP state how often the Supreme Court overturns the 9th Circuit (why doesn’t Congress rein in the 9th Circuit? Reduce their jurisdiction to the size of a postage stamp? Take away 100% of their caseload and give it to a newly-constituted federal circuit? These are mysteries that need solving.)? Why do I have to go to the internet to discover that the consensus is “80% of the time”?

Why does the piece mention that the 3 dissenting judges were all appointed by Republicans, without mentioning who appointed the 7 usurpers/tyrants?

Why is AP (inter alia) a leftist propaganda organ?

Calling the executive order a “modest action,” Judge Paul V. Niemeyer wrote that Supreme Court precedent required the court to consider the order “on its face.” Looked at that way, the executive order “is entirely without constitutional fault,” he wrote.

Exactly. It’s good to see that 30% of the judges involved still have at least some of their respect for the law intact.

“This would never have happened under President Cruz or President Romney”

Yeah, because they can’t get elected.

But nevermind that. What brilliant stratagem would be employed by these capable executives and their stalwart crews? How would they circumvent the press and the judiciary?

They wouldn’t, because they wouldn’t even try.

Dry-humping by Muslim men on metros (my experience at 15)…breasts grabbed in parks (17). Shut yer SJW yap, you loser, under “anonymous.” – find your balls while hiding under mommy’s skirt – use your real name like a man. If you are a guy, I dare you to fight against a gang of men raping your gf or bf (or porking you) in your sight. Don’t come yapping about SJW shit with “anonymous” on this site – too boring and ridiculous. I have already sent a trail of wolves after your scent. Man, I hate you guys that are so ambivalent…ambivalence is what gets you killed. Sorry, all you regular guys…I am in a very nasty and frustrated mood. You know I am super mad when angry – not cancer related, btw.

non-citizens have no rights. My parents were probably (I saw that as a child at Kennedy Airport in 1968) the only non-Asian immigrants…but, they all, all, all, all went thru the proper system.

Company cigarettes from the great tree are deadly.

Cinder, ash and fire. Some smoke it in a hurry. Others savour it.

And finally the Whale say, “Uuuuhhhh, Jonah?”

And Jonah say, [inhaling deeply] “What is it, Fish?”

Whale say, ” ‘What is it, ‘Fish’?”

He said, “That’s what I said: ‘What is it Fish?’ F-I-S-H- Fish!”

Say, “You got a new captain on this here mass mess now, Mr. Fish.”

He say, “I’m on the outside no more. I’m inside now!”

The Whale say, “Jonah, what in the world is you smoking in there? I thought I was off the Flibberty islands. Here I is two minutes from the Panama Canal! This jazz’s got to go.”

Jonah say, “What do you care what I’m smoking in here? I’m the captain of this mass mess I done explained to you before.”

No smoking on the ark. We’re all gonna die in the whale. Don’t forget your Zippo!

We tried to argue it was not in 1862, but the people who disagreed invaded and murdered us. These judges are only reminding everyone.

Nope. Those little bastards are all assured gigs as partners in Goldman Sachs, directors of marketing for Microsoft Corp., and sinecures as governmental functionaries with houses in Los Altos, Coral Gables, Malibu, and Bainbridge Island. They’ll suffer about as much as those in the Vichy Regime did under the Germans.

What have you been up to, there, Clint Eastwood? I haven’t seen footage of you storming the Bastille and manning the barricades on the evening news yet. Is it because you also realise being murderer or imprisoned by the government’s goons is futile?

You’re right that it is too late for a poltical solution, however, it is also too soon to be able to kill the bastards yet, either.

African-Americans aren’t that smart, that’s why.

Remember: the Supreme Court always backs down when the President puts direct pressure on them. FDR, Obamacare, etc.

And also remember: how many divisions does the Supreme Court have? See Andrew Jackson.

Marbury v. Madison is nothing but words on a piece of paper that the rest of the country has agreed to go along with. But the moment we stop agreeing, the courts have no power.

The Left steadily took over the courts in the twentieth century, thinking that converging them would make everyone bow to their authority. They neglected to realize that people only listen to courts when they perceive them as legitimate. Now that much of the country is viewing these decisions as illegitimate, the courts won’t be followed.

Trump as Andrew Jackson is going to happen, and the Left will have only successfully belied Marbury v. Madison.

Well, step two is people beginning to ask how many tank battalions the judges have.

Trump blew the opportunity to strike back against the lawlessness of the judiciary when the district court ruling was made.

Not only must the President have constitutional “no entry” authority in any kind of plausible reading of the constitution and in fact any plausible setup of authority for the leader in a free republic, but there is black letter law setting out such authority in our immigration law.

The district court was doing pure judicial imperialism. Trump should have just said what I said, read out the relevant section of law, made a few pithy comments about elections and the people being sovereign and then instructed State and Homeland Security employees to continue to carry out his instructions.

Huge missed opportunity. You can’t let the leftists drag you into their legal morass–delay, delay, harass, harass–when you have the authority to act.

Europe is so far down the Muslim road they don’t need any help.

I read an article today on Macron: he really really thinks Islam is not a problem. He has no difficulty with the Muslim Brotherhood.

He’s clearly very ill informed and that’s very depressing.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10392/france-macron-islamists

I desperately want to do something other than write comments here moaning about the problem.

But I don’t know what to do.

I spent two years working 24/7 for a Canadian blog that deals in Islam, immigration, typical issues. It was depressing to spend so much time reading such grim news.

I followed and blogged on even international aspects (southern Thai Muslims carry out another attack on Buddhists or Muslims who aren’t “with” the cause; in Pakistan the Taliban — or some other Sunni group — blows up a Christian church or a Shiite mosque with dozens killed; Bangladeshi Islamic nutjobs start setting fire to buses and trucks or even derail trains or kill atheists, because they want to usher in an Islamic paradise…etc).

What can I do in Canada? Shortly after this, a man even stupider than Macron — Justin Trudeau — is elected.

No party favours immigration restriction. There is no one to vote for. No Marine Le Pen, who lost anyway…

Or when Germany foolishly gave the Austrians a blank check to invade Serbia.

But it might well have ended better even so, if Britain had stayed out.

It’s hard to see how it could have been any worse.

“The great project of our elites, the Kalergi Plan of demographic displacement, must not be allowed to be stopped by mere voters.”

This plan is a concoction of your wild imagination. Furthermore, if you are hell bent on stopping things, why not take Vox Day’s advice and put it into action.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/05/mailvox-breivik-saint-or-monster.html

This plan is a concoction of your wild imagination

1. Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi is a real person who existed.

2. Kalergi said the following: “The human of the far future will be a hybrid…. The Euro-Asian-Negroid hybrid race of the future, akin to the likeness of the ancient Egyptians, will replace the variety of races with variety of personalities.”

3. There is an European Society Coudenhove-Kalergi.

4. Markle received an award from the above European Society Coudenhove-Kalergi.

5. Merkle has caused a million migrants, mostly male, to Enter Europe, with millions more on the way in the future.

Do you challenge the truthfulness of any of the above points 1-5?

Furthermore, if you are hell bent on stopping things, why not take Vox Day’s advice and put it into action.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/05/mailvox-breivik-saint-or-monster.html

LOL. Breivik was retaliation for a “Boikott Israel” sign being shown the day before.

Norway island boycott israel sign
Pro-Palestinian Activity Precedes Norway Massacre

I am sure Maj. Kong condemns killing children for sympathizing with Palestinians, do you?

Or when Germany foolishly gave the Austrians a blank check to invade Serbia

Or when Russia foolishly gave Serbia a blank check to resist Austria after they (foolishly) assassinated Austria’s heir to the throne.

The Kaiser summarises:

Wow thanks, Tiny. I googled up where you took that from

If my work over the last 5 yrs has taught me anything it's that white people aren't "uninformed" – what are is WILLFULLY IGNORANT.

— Leslie Mac (@LeslieMac) May 25, 2017

(the rest is in further tweets)
And, because of its source, it is a really good example for me to use in discussing these issues.
I would never have guessed your trolling would be useful