In this 20-minute short, Shrek (Mike Meyers) gets in the Halloween spirit by challenging the Donkey (Dean Edwards), Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas) and his other fairytale friends to come up with scary stories for a contest. Unfortunately for them, they must spend the night in Lord Farquaad's haunted castle in order to compete.
Also featuring the voices of Cameron Diaz as Princess Fiona and Kristen Schaal as Sugar. Directed by Gary Trousdale and Raman Hui and featuring '60s tunes.
This is an awesome animated film, directed by Andrew Adamson and Vicky Jenson, that began yet another smash franchis for Mike Myers. A green ogre called Shrek (Mike Meyers) discovers his swamp has been overrun with all sorts of fairytale creatures by the scheming Lord Farquaad (John Lithgow). This sends Shrek out, with a very loud donkey by his side, to convince Farquaad to return his swamp to the way it was. Farquaad makes a deal: if Shrek goes on a mission for him, Farquaad will help Shrek with his problem. Lord Farquaad wants to become the King, so he sends Shrek to rescue Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz), who is waiting for her one true love, and whom Farquaad intends to marry to become King. But once Shrek and the donkey start back with Fiona, it becomes apparent that not only does Shrek like Fiona, but Fiona may like Shrek, too.
"Shrek" (2001) is a very comical film that has intense animation. It took almost five years to complete this film because of the precision used on the graphics. While some still prefer the old-style hand-drawn Disney style of animation, this film is cutting edge. It is a most excellent choice for young and old alike.
Shrek and the donkey
Eddie Murphy is a standout as the abrasive donkey. Mike Myers, though, gets in most of the catch-phrases associated with the film ("What is he compensating for?") as he embarks on his mission to save the fair princess.
Shrek, the Donkey and Princess Fiona
Director Mike Adamson keeps the story wholesome and heartwarming. In a way, it is a throwback, with references to "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" and the inevitable lonely princess looking for love. The soundtrack is outstanding and is a must-buy.
The Donkey making a point
One common complaint about this film is that there is too much violence. If you are worried about that, you might want to preview the movie first before letting your toddler view it. But anyone above the age of, say, five should have no problem at all. Most people are OK with the relatively mild aggressiveness shown.
A preview of the next film, with Puss in Boots (who does not appear in Shrek)
There are some plot holes, but younger viewers are unlikely to notice. They will appreciate the fart jokes and the like - the film clearly is geared toward the young, though adults who suspend their belief will enjoy it as well. Mike Myers and Eddie Murphy carry the film, and it is one that you should feel comfortable with. It is tough to find anyone who strongly dislikes Shrek. In addition, this is a great film to start a child on because there are several sequels which are basically just variations on the same theme. Once your child (or you, after he/she plays it 100 times, as they tend to do) tires of this one, he or she will be amused all over again with "new" stories. You might want to consider buying the box set as a nice gift. And don't forget 2011's "Puss In Boots," the delightful feature film focusing on Shrek's eventual comrade (see picture above).
Shrek the Third: The Battle Over the Succession Turns Ugly!
"Shrek the Third" (2007) continues the animated adventures of our favorite hairy hero, Shrek, as he just tries to live his life in peace while everyone else keeps pulling him back into trouble. When his new father-in-law, King Harold falls ill, Shrek is looked at as the heir to the land of Far, Far Away. Not one to give up his beloved
swamp, Shrek recruits his friends the Donkey and Puss in Boots to install
the rebellious Artie as the new king. Princess Fiona, however, rallies a
band of royal girlfriends to fend off a coup d'etat by the jilted
Prince Charming.
Alternate poster
Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz, Julie Andrews, John Cleese, Rupert Everett, and the rest all reprise their roles from the other Shrek films. However, Andrew Adamson stepped aside this time and turned directing chores over to Chris Miller and Raman Hui. As usual, there are lots of fast jokes that will keep the children happy. Some relatively adult issues, such as the fear of becoming a parent, might lose some of the younger children.
Ladies of the Court
The only thing truly missing is a little originality. "Shrek the Third" received poor reviews when it came out. The critics really did not like it. The third film in a franchise often gets that kind of reception. It still did very respectable box office. With a budget of $160-million and directed by Chris Miller and Raman Hui, the movie made a domestic-gross of over $322-million. Overall, it made $800 million worldwide. Doubling your gross is usually considered the break-even point, so this film undoubtedly made the studio good money. The film was promoted heavily, and successfully.
The Donkey, Shrek, Lady Fiona
Of course, box office is not the real measure of animated film quality, except to the accountants. The widespread complaint about this entry is that it was not as funny as the first two films. Also, the same kinds of jokes are made (the animated creatures singing versions of classic rock tunes, for instance), and they can seem a bit stale. The absence of Adamson at the helm may have had something to do with this.
Shrek, the Donkey, Lady Fiona
There was another, and officially final, Shrek film after this, "Shrek Forever After" (2010). It also was heavily criticized, and also made a ton of money, almost as much as the others. Either you like the whole Shrek universe, or you don't. Clearly, many, many moviegoers do.
Shrek and Artie
DreamWorks' marketing for "Shrek the Third" went into overdrive. The company naturally was excited for the series after the outlandish success of "Shrek 2" and plastered the media with promotion. It got so bad that some online comedy teams like Tim and Eric of Adult Swim started creating parody ads "promoting" the film on television and radio and in podcasts and the like. It's hard to say what effect all that had on the success of "Shrek the Third," but it sure got the word out about the film - perhaps a bit too much for some folks.
This continues the Shrek juggernaut and made a lot of money. Just don't expect to be dazzled as with the first installment, or pleasantly surprised as in the second. This is simply a continuation of the story, without really expanding the characters or adding any new dimension to the franchise. Check out the trailer below!
Shrek Forever After: Rumpelstiltskin Pulls A Fast One on Shrek
After the critical lambasting taken by "Shrek The Third," Mike Myers (Shrek) and company (Eddie Murphy as the Donkey, Cameron Diaz as Fiona, Antonio Banderas as Puss et. al) returned quickly with this DreamWorks animated conclusion to the Shrek Story, "Shrek Forever After (2010), directed by Mike Mitchell. Many would agree that "Shrek Forever After" is a slight improvement over the previous entry in the series, but it still is nowhere near as entertaining as was the original Shrek film or even Shrek 2. That didn't stop "Shrek Forever After" from doing the usual "Shrek" box office, of course. It ultimately took in over $750 million worldwide.
I love DVD artwork
This time around, Shrek is bored with living the domestic life. A trip to Far Far Away turns into a demeaning disaster, with children disrespecting him and people acting as if he is completely harmless. After smashing the kids' birthday cake, he tells Fiona that he was better off before he ever met her.
Cameron Diaz and her character
Con artist Rumpelstiltskin (Walt Dohrn)sees and hears all this, and he has an idea. After pretending that Shrek has saved him from an accident, he offers to grant Shrek a favor. Shrek quickly makes a deal with Rumpelstiltskin to exchange a day from his childhood that he wouldn't remember anyway for a day where he will be respected as a true Ogre. Shrek signs on the dotted line, and suddenly finds himself in a place where, indeed, he is feared by the villagers and everyone respects his true power as an ogre.
Donkey and Dragon
After having a little good-natured fun and seeing "Wanted" posters for Fiona, Shrek is captured by witches and brought before Rumpelstiltskin. In this universe, Rumpelstiltskin is king and ogres like Shrek and Fiona are hunted down and killed. Worse still, he and Fiona have never met, and if Shrek doesn't get a "true kiss" from her before the next sunrise, he will fade from existence completely. The day that Rumpelstiltskin erased was the day that Shrek was born, and if the contract runs to its conclusion, Shrek's existence also will be erased.
Fiona pushes away Shrek
Shrek escapes from Rumpelstiltkin with the aid of the donkey, who doesn't know Shrek at first but eventually comes around and becomes friends with him again. The Donkey reads the contract and finds a loophole: the only way to nullify the contract is for Shrek to get from Fiona "love's true kiss." They set out to look for Fiona, and soon find her with a renegade band of ogres and the retired and overweight Puss in Boots as her pet.
A fat Puss in the alternate universe
Fiona is all business and has no time for Shrek. She is planning an attack on Rumpelstiltskin and doesn't want to hear about true love. While arguing with Shrek, though, Fiona begins to like him a bit, though it doesn't lead to true love yet. The ambush against Rumpelstiltskin fails miserably, and Fiona and Shrek only escape with the help of Puss and Donkey. Shrek, however, turns himself in to Rumpelstiltskin in exchange for the amnesty for all ogres, but Rumpelstiltkin finds a technicality that excludes Fiona because she is not "all ogre," just one by night, and he plans to feed both Shrek and Fiona to Dragon.
"It's good to be king"
Shrek and the others finally manage to overpower Dragon, but the sun is about to come up and it may be too late. Will Fiona realize the power of true love and save them both?
Shrek looking puzzled
By this installment, Shrek and the gang basically are cult film characters. Either you like their act by this point and want more of it, or you don't. This is not a good film to start your Shrek experience with, because it assumes you know the events of the preceding three films. If you don't understand the deep bond between Shrek and Fiona, why would you care if they are split up? So, better to start from the beginning and watch the preceding three films first. That will greatly enhance your enjoyment of this one.
"You remember me now, right?"
The entertainment is wholesome and satisfying if you are not too critical. One can see where the creators of the hit ABC TV series "Once Upon a Time" got some of their inspiration (which, I'm sure, they would vehemently deny, with loud declamations and all sorts of incontrovertible proof). The script is somewhat bland, however, and the jokes don't seem as fresh as in the first film of the series.
Shrek and Fiona
This one also suffers from being in the somewhat gimmicky 3D animation format. It doesn't really seem to add much to the film compared to the others. If you love wearing those 3D glasses, though, by all means run out and watch this one! Small children may have trouble keeping the glasses on.... If, like me, you don't really care for it most of the time, you may wind up liking this about as much as you did "Jaws 3-D." Oh, you never watched that film? Exactly my point. Not too many people did.
Shrek's family
This film was promoted as being the final instalment. Who knows? There hasn't been any buzz about a follow-up, so maybe it is - at least, for now. They did make a "prequel" starring Shrek's loveable companion "Puss in Boots" in 2011, so they already are parsing the definition of "final." Mike Myers and the rest are set for several lifetimes, so there is no pressing need. But "never say never again," you know. That this might, indeed, be the end, at least for this generation, may account for the fact that critics were a little softer on this one than on "Shrek the Third." No more Shrek? To many, that is like losing an old friend.
The characters from the alternate universe
Defenders of this film usually point to the gross. Indeed, it made about as much money as did the previous Shrek films, so what's the problem? All very well and good, but they ended this series for a reason, and that is they just were running out of inspiration. Trust the power of the almight Dollar, this series will be back someday, it just needs a rest.
Shrek is happy to be feared again
As far as "Shrek" films go, this is good but not great. In terms of the story, you could watch this right after the first "Shrek" film and not miss anything by having skipped the second and third instalments. In fact, that might even make more sense, since this deals with the events surrounding Shrek's initial rescue of Fiona. Then, you could watch "Shrek 2" and leave "Shrek the Third" for last. At least, in hindsight, that makes the most sense now, and if you never have the chance to actually watch "Shrek the Third," well, at least you've seen all the really good Shrek films.
Rumpelstiltskin has a deal for Shrek
"Shrek Forever After" does have a lot of laughs. It borrows liberally from Jimmy Stewart's "It's A Wonderful Life," and has a deep air of sentimentality to it, especially the closing credits which feature pictures from the entire series backed by a sappy Stevie Wonder tune. It is fun, it will make you laugh, it just doesn't offer much new in the way of expanding the characters or parodying traditional fairy tales. Instead, it becomes an exercise in puns and action sequences that the first two Shrek films kept under control, but now take over the entire film.
Thanks for watching!
If you liked "Shrek," if you like "Shrek 2," if "Shrek the Third" was fun for you, then this one is in the same vein and you definitely should see it. It is almost mandatory, like attending graduation from school. Otherwise, I would steer clear.
