ShitMenSay
1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
brutereason
It’s not bigotry to oppose Christianism, which is a political ideology, not a religion.

Refuse to accept their terms. Don’t allow vicious fanatics who want to punish the vulnerable hide Grover Norquist, the American Conservative Union, ALEC, Fox News, Steve Bannon, the NRA, and even Donald Trump behind the cross.

We can’t be too polite to call Christianists out by name.
Source: theestablishment.co
cchristinefair
cchristinefair

These two radical pro gun extremists left these lunatic remarks on my linked in page in response to this article (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/08/the_first_and_second_amendments_clashed_in_charlottesville_the_guns_won.html) about the ways in which guns are silencing the speech of those of who who do not think our freedoms lie in the barrel of an AR-15 carried by a semi-literate, beer-gut stuffed into military surplus battle rattle.


Radical Pro Gun Extremist 1:  Raul Mas (https://www.linkedin.com/in/raulmas/)

Radical Pro Gun Extremist 2:  Mark Ginn3rd degree connection (https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-ginn-aaab7b6b/)

These radical pro gun extremists argue that their guns secure –not undermine–speech rights.  This is true if you are a pusillanimous person who has no argument except your gun and you use your gun to bully people who actually have arguments to make. (Both of these gentlemen cleary failed civics as they don’t seem to understand free speech. I am exercising MY free speech to call them dumbass radical pro-gun extremists AND to make this post about them.)

Oddly other countries rank higher than the United States does (Sweden for example) on democratic freedoms and the freedom-dripping Swedes don’t need troglodytes with their own ammo depots to protect their freedoms.

This raises the obvious question…what the HELL is wrong with America.

Also these dumbasses should bother reading what the 2nd Amendment actually says. It calls for well-regulated militias, which all states have. It’s called the National Guard… not a bunch of random white dudes with “savior complexes.”  

These two radical pro gun extremists left these lunatic remarks on my linked in page in response to this article (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/08/the_first_and_second_amendments_clashed_in_charlottesville_the_guns_won.html) about the ways in which guns are silencing the speech of those of who who do not think our freedoms lie in the barrel of an AR-15 carried by a semi-literate, beer-gut stuffed into military surplus battle rattle.


Radical Pro Gun Extremist 1:  Raul Mas (https://www.linkedin.com/in/raulmas/)

Radical Pro Gun Extremist 2:  Mark Ginn3rd degree connection (https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-ginn-aaab7b6b/)

These radical pro gun extremists argue that their guns secure –not undermine–speech rights.  This is true if you are a pusillanimous person who has no argument except your gun and you use your gun to bully people who actually have arguments to make. (Both of these gentlemen cleary failed civics as they don’t seem to understand free speech. I am exercising MY free speech to call them dumbass radical pro-gun extremists AND to make this post about them.)

Oddly other countries rank higher than the United States does (Sweden for example) on democratic freedoms and the freedom-dripping Swedes don’t need troglodytes with their own ammo depots to protect their freedoms.

This raises the obvious question…what the HELL is wrong with America.

Also these dumbasses should bother reading what the 2nd Amendment actually says. It calls for well-regulated militias, which all states have. It’s called the National Guard… not a bunch of random white dudes with “savior complexes.”  

ShitMenSay RadicalProGunExtremists