Who are People Willing to Date? Ethnic and Gender Patterns in Online Dating
- 2k Downloads
The United States is a rapidly diversifying country with ethnic minorities comprising over a quarter of the US population. By the year 2050, over half of the United States will be ethnic minority, underscoring the importance of better understanding race relations and willingness to date intra- and inter-racially. Data from 2,123 online dating profiles were randomly collected from four racial groups (Asian, Black, Latino, and White). Results indicated that willingness to date intra-racially was generally high and that willingness to date inter-racially was lower and influenced by racial social status. Because men evidenced an overall high willingness to date inter-racially, women’s willingness to out-date provided a more accurate depiction of racial social status and exchange. Women of higher racial status groups were less willing than those from lower status groups to outdate. Results are explored and discussed in relation to different theories of interpersonal attraction and dating.
KeywordsEthnicity Race Dating Gender Online
This manuscript was partially supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grant 1R34MH73545-01A2 and the Asian American Center on Disparities Research (NIMH grant: 1P50MH073511-01A2).
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Bourgeault, R. (1989). Race, class, and gender: Colonial domination of Indian women. Socialist Studies, 5, 87–105.Google Scholar
- Craig-Henderson, K. M. (2006). Black men in interracial relationships: What’s love got to do with it?. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Fu, X., & Heaton, T. B. (2000). Status exchange in intermarriage among Hawaiians, Japanese, Filipinos and Caucasians in Hawaii: 1983–1994. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31, 45–61.Google Scholar
- Gaines, S. O., & Leaver, J. (2002). Interracial relationships. In R. Goodwin (Ed.), Inappropriate relationships: The unconventional, the disapproved, and the forbidden (pp. 65–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Graves, J. L., Jr. (2005). The race myth: Why we pretend race exists in America?. New York, NY: Dutton Press.Google Scholar
- Grieco, E. M., & Cassidy, R. C. (2000). Overview of race and Hispanic origin: Census 2000 brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Hall, C. I. (2009). Asian American women: The nail that sticks out is hammered down. In N. Tewari & A. N. Alvarez (Eds.), Asian American psychology: Current perspectives (pp. 193–209). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Hitsch, G. J., Hortascsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2006). What makes you click? Mate preferences and matching outcomes in online. MIT Sloan Research No. 4603-06. Retrieved March 19, 2010, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=895442.
- Horton, J. O., & Horton, L. E. (2004). Slavery and the making of America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hunter, M. L. (2002). If you’re light you’re alright. Gender & Society, 16, 175–193.Google Scholar
- Iwamoto, D. K., & Liu, W. M. (2009). Asian American men and Asianized attribution: Intersections of masculinity, race, and sexuality. In N. Tewari & A. N. Alvarez (Eds.), Asian American psychology: Current perspectives (pp. 211–232). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Jones, N. A. (2005). We the people of more than one race in the United States. Census 2000 Special Reports CENSR-22. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- Kalmijin, M. (1993). Trends in Black/White intermarriage. Social Forces, 72, 119–146.Google Scholar
- Kreider, R. M., & Simmons, T. (2003). Marital status: 2000. Retrieved March 19, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-30.pdf.
- Lofquist, D., Lugaila, T., O’Connell, M., & Feliz, S. (2012). Households and families: 2010. Retrieved April 25, 2012, from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-14.pdf.
- Loving v. Virginia. (1967). 388 U.S. 1.Google Scholar
- Madden, M., & Lenhart, A. (2006). Online dating. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
- McAdoo, H. P. (1988). Black families. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. K. (1941). Intermarriage and the social structure: Fact and theory. Psychiatry, 4, 361–374.Google Scholar
- Miller, R., Perlman, D., & Brehm, S. (2006). Intimate relationships. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Mullings, L. (1994). Images, ideology, and women of color. In M. B. Zinn & B. T. Dill (Eds.), Women of color in U.S. society (pp. 265–290). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Simmons, T., & O’Connell, M. (2003). Married-couple and unmarried-partner households: 2000. Retrieved March 19, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-5.pdf.
- Tucker, M. B., & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (Eds.). (1995). The decline in marriage among African Americans. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Wilson, D. S., & Jacobson, C. K. (1995). White attitudes toward Black and White interracial marriage. In C. K. Jacobsen (Ed.), American families: Issues in race and ethnicity. Garland library of sociology (pp. 353–367). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
- Yancey, G. (2002). Who interracially dates: An examination of the characteristics of those who have interracially dated. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33, 179–190.Google Scholar