Historical
and Archaeological Context
Constantinople and the longest Roman aqueduct
The
Flourishing City
The Roman city of Byzantium on the natural boundary between Europe and
Asia, was re-founded as Constantinopolis in AD 330 by the emperor
Constantine. Taking on the mantle of old Rome, the city became a focus
for imperial patronage and display, quickly acquiring the grand urban
structures expected of any classical metropolis; the fora, baths, colonnaded
streets and hippodrome. The walls of the old city were expanded and within
two decades the urban population began to grow exponentially. At a time
when many western cities stagnated or shrunk in size, late antique Constantinople
expanded and flourished in both cultural and physical wealth, to provide
a secure urban setting for the eastern empire into the later middle ages.
Medieval Byzantium was renowned and admired as a centre of Christian art
and culture until the 15th century when the city finally fell to the Ottoman
conqueror Mehmet II.
Fragmentary
relics survive from the Byzantine city, but much has been lost or lies
buried beneath the later Ottoman city and Turkish Istanbul. Yet the fundamental
necessities for urban existence in the early medieval world, religion,
security and sustenance, are represented in three of the city's greatest
surviving monuments. The sixth-century emperor Justinian's finest achievement,
the church of Hagia Sophia, dominates the Istanbul skyline and the western
extent of the old city is still marked by Theodosius' fortification scheme
of AD 415. The third structure is the Bozdogan Kemeri, a great water bridge
of some 86 arches spanning one of the city's busiest highways and normally
identified as the Aqueduct of Valens (Dalman
1933; Mango
1995). According to a contemporary source this emperor welcomed the
Thracian nymphs and waters to the thirsty city, transported there by the
new 'overground and underground river' (Greg. Naz. PG. 36.221C).
The Long-Distance Aqueduct
Given the monumentality
of the Aqueduct of Valens, it is sometimes hard to imagine that it was
originally conceived as only a single component of a much grander scheme,
which had probably been started in around AD 345. This was a vast and
complex system, which supplied the city with water from a variety of sources
in Thrace. At over 250km, it is the longest water supply line known from
the ancient world and it remains one of the greatest achievements of hydraulic
engineering. More than 30 stone water bridges and many kilometers of underground
tunnels carried the water over mountain and plain from the plentiful springs
of the Istranja mountains near Vize straight into the heart of the city.
Such
was the magnificence of the undertaking that it even appears to have received
its own popular mythology in the city it watered: an Ottoman writer was
later to claim that the aqueduct had drained the great Danube river itself
(Evliya Çelebi, Seyahatname, I, 484). The known system is at least two
and half times the length of the longest recorded Roman aqueducts at Carthage
and Cologne, but perhaps more significantly it represents one of the most
outstanding surveying achievements of any pre-industrial society.
The Later History of the Water Supply
The historical sources
record the continuing maintenance of the system until the early 7th century.
However in AD 487 the aqueduct was reportedly cut by the Goth Theodoric
Strabo and it was also apparently damaged during the Avars seige of the
city in 626. Restoration of the long-distance system is not recorded until
AD 767 in the reign of Constantine V. Some historians have interpreted
this 150 year hiatus marking the end of the 'classical water system',
with dire consequences for the maintenance of a large urban population
(Mango 1995).
Magdalino (1996) adopts less pessimistic position and has recently questioned
this interpretation of the city's demographic decline. Neither account
however considers the possibility that the sources closer to the city
were continuously (or even increasingly) exploited during this period
(See sections on Halkali and the Forest of Belgrade).
Throughout
the middle ages the water bridges and channels were disrupted by earthquakes,
so that by the late 12th century the long-distance system is said to have
been abandoned as a result of cumulative seismic damage. Like the Anastasian
Wall, the final reference to the aqueducts was in a nostalgic late 15th
century list of the Wonders of Constantinople. After the fall of the city
to the Ottomans, a new system was constructed in the 16th century based
entirely on the closer sources at Halkali and in the Forest of Belgrade.
|