Posted by Alex on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:44 | #

It would seem many of the events that we see taking place today and appear ever so spontaneous had been planned long ago.  I very much recommend reading the book that forms the title of this thread and which can be found free and on-line here. 

I’ll soon enough be posting some quotes from this book.

Posted by Roger Gray on Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:19 | #

Admittedly, I do sometimes wonder why Britain especially, even leaving out its empire interests, would have struggled might and main against Germany, its natural kin.  I find it especially interesting that some in Germany, and the US, were, according to your account, self-consciously advocating a new Romanist ideal, considering that Britain, to an embarrassing degree, modelled itself on late antiquity. Couldn’t they have found a rapprochement?

Instead, so far as I can tell, Britain exhausted herself defeating Germany. To what end? Most people are not aware, it seems, that Britain was the greater beneficiary of the Marshal Plan than Germany. Yet it is Germany that has triumphed.

Posted by Alex on Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:26 | #

‘self-consciously advocating a new Romanist ideal…’

Regarding ‘a new Romanist ideal’...leaving aside some of the more esoteric stuff, this person seems to have got what that is in part about in regards to the linked book topping this post in what he describes below from an article the writer entitled ‘Freemasonry and the Roman Spirit’.  It would seem, as with many a past ruler and potnentate, that at some very high levels of these things there are those who see themselves as recreating the Roman Empire

Study of the ideas of the leaders of these forces within Freemasonry   reveals that their dream, intention and plan was to create out of Britain and America a New Rome, a new World Empire, a new uniformity of thought and lifestyle that would embrace the whole world. To this end, a new state, the United States of America, was established, the first “world state”...

Both in Britain and in the USA in the 18th and 19th centuries, aristocratic, oligarchical and anti-democratic forces working within the hierarchical structure of Freemasonry ensconced themselves within the political establishments of those countries - to what end ? Study of the ideas of the leaders of these forces within Freemasonry   reveals that their dream, intention and plan was to create out of Britain and America a New Rome, a new World Empire, a new uniformity of thought and lifestyle that would embrace the whole world. To this end, a new state, the United States of America, was established, the first “world state”, made up of immigrants from all over the world rather than just from one ethnic community - a New Atlantis as intended by the British Elizabethan occultist John Dee, adviser to the Virgin Queen, and by Francis Bacon, James I’s Chancellor, and ruled by a scientific priestly elite. This is how the Freemasons of the Revolutionary and post-Revolutionary generations saw themselves…

He goes on…

The Temple and the Roman Imperial Spirit

The Jerusalem Temple and Imperial Rome: these are what have linked Freemasonry with the New Rome of the New World Order since the days of the Templars, who based their esotericism on the symbology of the Temple of Solomon which they had learned in the Crusades. Their very name was associated with the Temple, and many of Freemasonry’s rites too are based on the Temple of Solomon. The god-given esotericism of ancient Israel was thus conjoined with what was essentially an imperial Roman will to power. Today we see again an alliance between those forces that lead the Jewish people and those that lead the New Rome; indeed the State of Israel today, just as in Herod’s day, is a client state of an Imperial Rome, the only difference being that, unlike Herod’s kingdom,  without the aid of the New Rome, the modern State of Israel would very likely not have survived.

As for the part of the book title that is ‘The United States of the World’ it would seem that the intent is in time to join all these continental super-states…ie the United States of [North] America/American Union, United States of Europe/European Union, etc… together and thus form ‘The United States of the World/World Union. 

Africa too is very much a part of this with Muammar Gadafy making a strong push for a United States of Africa...

Muammar Gaddafi vows to create ‘United States of Africa’

February 2, 2009

The Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi vowed to create a ‘United States of Africa’ after his election as head of the African Union.

Colonel Gaddafi, 66, was elected to lead the 53-nation AU for a year in a closed-door vote during a summit in Addis Ababa.

Dressed in a gold robe and cap, he made clear his intention to push for an alternative “USA” - a plan he has outlined before and that has met with resistance among fellow African leaders.

“I hope my term will be a time of serious work and not just words,” he said in his inaugural speech.

“I shall continue to insist that our sovereign countries work to achieve the United States of Africa,” he said, admitting that African leaders were “not near to a settlement” on the issue.

“We are still independent states. It is your decision to respond to the call for unity, to push Africa forward towards the United States of Africa.”

Gaddafi is one of Africa’s longest-serving leaders, having taken power in a coup at the age of 27 in 1969.

And powerful elements of the elites of the US and UK are involved in this support of Gadafy as quoted below from this site...

First came the decision to accept responsibility for the bombing of a Pan-Am airliner over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988.  Then came the renunciation of weapons of mass destruction.    His reward was the ending of international sanctions and the resumption of diplomatic relations with the United States and Britain.    This has opened the way for foreign co-operation to develop the Libyan economy and the all-important oil sector.

Posted by Alex on Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:48 | #

Some quotes from the book…

pg 59

4 - Mission

Thus intently is this republic [the US] at work upon the fusion of all nations, not of this continent alone, but of all the continents, into one people.

and…

pg 70-71

‘Rapture - Robert Altman (circa Late 1960’s American Hippies)

Nations, we have seen, are unions based upon community of speech;    this the Americans renounced, in favor of a union based upon a unity of thought;    and thus fell nationality, and arose the republic...   

...It is the duty of the American party to combat all European traditions which are incompatible with Americanism;  but, above all, that of nationality.  To vindicate individualism against nationality, is the office of America.

The revolution is the offspring of the only people which is not a nation.    A gathering of all the exiles of the world -and an exile is a man deprived of his nationality, rejected by his nation- an assemblage whose spring of action was disgust at the national cruelties which they had fled;    a convocation from all the corners of the world for conscience sake, for the preservation of this individual sovereignty against the encroachments of national traditions;    a horde of emigrants who knew nationality in the guise of national poverty;  America was, by force of circumstances, the rendezvous of all to whom nationality had been the source of all their sufferings.

Nations, we have seen, are unions based upon community of speech;    this the Americans renounced, in favor of a union based upon a unity of thought;    and thus fell nationality, and arose the republic.    The native Americans partly have been forced to doff the European part of their title;    and they have done wisely.    It is the duty of the American party to combat all European traditions which are incompatible with Americanism;  but, above all, that of nationality.  To vindicate individualism against nationality, is the office of America.    This is, at the same time, the whole force and scope of the revolution;    thus, the revolution which arose in and with America, must for ever return to it;    and America, which began in revolution, must live in it, and end with it.    When the dominion of nationality is crushed, and the sovereignty of the individual is attained, everywhere and everyhow, the missions of the revolution and of America will both be accomplished

pg 73-74

US troops in Afghanistan - 2005

we do not conquer, we liberate..

...We go behind nationalities to find the people.    This is the head and front of our offending;    this is what will give to the American Revolution the empire of the world.

The independence and the union of the state require its universality.    The American sovereign feels his title to the full enjoyment of his independence in every corner of the globe, and to protection in that enjoyment.    Those who have united among themselves on the ground of the discovery of common principles, and a common nature, feel the force of the argument to apply to all other men with whom they hold the same principles in common.    ‘The enlargement of the orbis of government,’ was declared by Hamilton, (Federalist, pg 52) ‘an indispensible element of American welfare.’    ‘The immediate object of the Federal Constitution is, to secure, the union of the thirteen primitive states, which we know to be practicable:    and to add to them such other states as may arise in their own bosoms, or in their neighborhoods, which we cannot doubt to be equally practicable.’  (Ibid, pg 85)    This is the doctrine of Filibustierism;  to which those of our moralists educated to European ways of thinking, oppose the wrongfulness of conquest, and the unrighteousness of a propaganda by force and violence.  But we do not conquer, we liberate;    we abolish force and violence, and do not introduce it.    Our ‘form of government,’ miscalled from a fallacious use of European terms, is a system of non-government, of the abscence of all dictation;    and the imposition of non-gevernment is a contradiction in terms.    We do not propose to force the Cubans to expel their Captain General, but to prevent the Captain General from forcing the Cubans to retain him.    We will not compel the Japanese to trade with us, but the Japanese government to abstain from preventing the intercourse of the Japanese with us, if they think proper to open it.    We go behind nationalities to find the people.    This is the head and front of our offending;    this is what will give to the American Revolution the empire of the world.

The infederation of states will proceed in a regular gradation, depending upon their more or less intimate connection with the existing republic…

Posted by NeoNietzsche on Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:21 | #

4) Immediately following the conquest of Germany by the US and UK, a struggle will ensue centered upon Europe (in time encompassing the entire globe) between specifically the United States and Russia.  The United States will prevail in this struggle with Russia.

So they hope.

But there will be no winner in this “struggle”.

There will be no USA and no Russia, in the aftermath.

[No suitcase nuclear weapons foreseen in 1853.]

But the geo-political foresight is remarkable.

Posted by Alex on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:00 | #

It should be noted that unlike in the 19th century when this book was published, today the center of world finance is no longer located in London, but is rather in New York City, and it is not British troops predominantly doing the fighting in Afghanistan and other parts of the Middle East, but US troops.

From the bottom of page 87 and top of pg. 88 of The New Rome; or, the United States of the World...

‘The stupendous greatness of England is factitious, and will only become natural when that empire shall have found its real centre. That centre is in the United States…’

Bush and Blair

The stupendous greatness of England is factitious, and will
only become natural when that empire shall have found its
real centre. That centre is in the United States. The An-
glican empire is essentially oceanic. Its dominions extend
along the coasts of the Atlantic and the Pacific, the lesser
and the greater ocean. America, lying in the midst of the
ocean, is therefore its natural point of gravitation…

The US ‘takes the lead’.  US and UK troops in Iraq.

...The realization of an idea higher than could be developed in the
mother island, that of the republican democracy, required a
temporary segregation of the centre ; that task accomplished,
it is time to call for a re-union ; but the former adjunct being
now no longer merely the geographical centre, but the polit-
ical and social focus, must take the lead…

Posted by Alex on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:17 | #

From an article published in the United States in 1958 in the very US establishment publication Time magazine.

’...the roads which once led to imperial Rome and London now converge on Washington.’

Diplomacy:  The New Rome

Flying into the U.S. from the far ends of the earth, a flock of foreign statesmen last week demonstrated that the roads which once led to imperial Rome and London now converge on Washington. Unlike their counterparts in the days of the Caesars and the Gladstones, they came not as satraps but as friends. But each of these ambassadors to the new Rome had a plea or a complaint…

Posted by Alex on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:26 | #

I agree NN that there would in reality ultimately be no ‘winner’ in such a struggle that this book describes… unless someone calls a future for the entirety of humanity being a boot stomping a human face forever as ‘winning’ as Orwell described things in his dystopia One has to bear in mind that there are powerful elements of elites of various peoples that are doing these things and they only would seem to care about acquiring wealth and power, and not right and wrong.

Posted by Lurker on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:33 | #

Britain was the greater beneficiary of the Marshal Plan than Germany. Yet it is Germany that has triumphed.

In that era Britain embarked on the building of the welfare state - public housing, NHS etc and supporting an unprecedented massive peacetime military.

Not the only factors of course but…

Posted by Alex on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:32 | #

‘Having received its legitimate organization’ is a reference to the US and UK having re-unified.    Recall ‘the special relationship’ between those two powers since about 1900,  a relationship that is only just short of an outright political union, and that since that time the US and UK have done just about everything together, particularly in the area of wars.

From the bottoms of pages 95 and 105

pg 95

‘This [Germany] is the hearthstone of Europe, physically and morally…’

Two Wounded British Infantry Walking Arm-in-Arm With Wounded German Prisoner in WWI in France - 1916

6. — The Teutonic Race.

The Anglo-Saxon empire, having received its legitimate
organization, will be first brought into connection with that
portion of the continent of Europe inhabited by tribes akin
to itself.

Germany.

This is the hearthstone of Europe, physically and morally ;
all the burdens of Europe are poured into its lap, and it is
constantly atoning by its sufferings for the sins of all the
nations…

pg 105

’...the Anglo-Saxon empire shall lay its slow but unyielding grasp upon the countries of the Germanic confederation.’

Eisenhower, Patton, and Truman in Berlin - 1945

8. — The Sclavonic [Slavic] Race.

That great uprising of all peoples, that world’s war which
is for ever seen to hang, like the sword of Damocles, over the
passing joys and troubles of the hour, will fall when the
Anglo-Saxon empire shall lay its slow but unyielding grasp
upon the countries of the Germanic confederation.

‘Then will the mastery of Europe be the prize of the death-struggle
between the Union [the United States] and the Czar.’

US and Soviet Troops Meet at Torgau (1945)

Then will the mastery of Europe be the prize of the death-struggle
between the Union and the Czar.  That mighty power now
governs the continent from the coasts of Siberia to the
German Ocean, and from the English Channel to the Medi-
terranean…

Posted by Alex on Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:30 | #

From pgs. 107, 109, 155, 156 regarding Russia.  Bearing in mind that this was written in 1852 and published in 1853, on page 156 the author writes of US air power defeating Russia and its land armies.  On the page before he speaks of the world being on ‘the eve of aerial navigation.’

pg 107

‘Napoleon’s vision failed when he said that in fifty years Europe
must be either republican or Cossack : he should have said
that it would be first Cossack, and then Yankee…’

Napoleon’s vision failed when he said that in fifty years Europe
must be either republican or Cossack : he should have said
that it would be first Cossack, and then Yankee. Russia
must either deal or drink destruction : she is ever intent
upon the former. European aristocracy cannot withstand
her, for it is already absorbed, one half in monarchical, the
other in democratic interests. European democracy cannot
withstand her, for it is disorganized, unsteady, theoretical,
and unstatesmanlike. It contemplates ideals without bridging
the gulph between them and reality, and still cleaves to the
very traditions which have created and are preserving the
greatness of its enemies ; it wars upon property, commerce,
and family, when it has no institution at hand capable of sup-
planting them ; and overlooks the scaly monster Nationality,
and the United States, the certain antidote…

pg 109

‘Thus the lines are drawn. The choirs are marshalled on
each wing of the world’s stage, Russia leading the one, the
United States the other. Yet the world is too small for both,
and the contest must end in the downfall of the one and the
victory of the other.’

US tanks (foreground) in standoff with Soviet tanks in Berlin - October 22, 1961

Thus the lines are drawn. The choirs are marshalled on
each wing of the world’s stage, Russia leading the one, the
United States the other. Yet the world is too small for both,
and the contest must end in the downfall of the one and the
victory of the other. Let those who will speculate on the
permanent universality of subjection ; the stakes are safe on
the side of the universe of sovereigns. Russia has expended
all her forces in making a formidable display on her Western
border. The United States are already digging the trenches
for an attack in the rear.

pg.155-156

‘It [air power] will give us the victory over Russian continentalism. American air-privateers will be down upon the Russian garrisons, to use our own expressive slang, ‘like a parcel of bricks’...

US Aerial Bombardment of Japan - 1945

We are on the eve of aerial navigation…

The first four acts already past,
A fifth shall close the drama with the day;
Time’s noblest offspring is the last.

The sea is less confined than the river, the ocean more ubiqui-
tous than the sea, but the air alone is fitted for a universal
civilization. Its shores are every where; it can penetrate the
poles ; it will settle the wilds of Tartary and the valleys of
Central Africa. It will know no harbors and no ports, no
depots and no entrepots. It will make all parts of the earth
alike passable and alike accessible. It will give us the vic-
tory over Russian continentalism. Freedom is now limited
to the oceanic world, to England and America ; Russia, with
its continental dependencies, is despotic ; it has no ships, and
therefore no freedom ; no freedom, and therefore no navy ;
having no navy, it can never do great injury to the seafaring
world. But its despotism gives it an army, and its army will
protect its despotism. The seafaring nations, on the other
hand, have their navy to protect their freedom, but they will
never have a large standing army to extend their system.
To suppose this, would be to deny every leading characteristic
of Americanism. This would keep the two halves of the
world in a state of perpetual isolation, did not the navigation
of the air restore them to a common element. American
air-privateers will be down upon the Russian garrisons — to
use our own expressive slang — ” like a parcel of bricks ;” and
the Russian serfs will fasten to their skirts, and be elevated to
a share in their liberties.

Compare the above excerpt from pg 155-156 of the 1853 book with something written about the modern Russian Alexander Dugin below.  A person might begin to think that these things were being manipulated between the US and Russia. 

Dugin’s theories foresee an eternal world conflict between land and sea, and hence, Dugin believes, the U.S. and Russia…

Dugin’s theories foresee an eternal world conflict between land and sea, and hence, Dugin believes, the U.S. and Russia. He says, “In principle, Eurasia and our space, the heartland Russia, remain the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution.” According to his 1997 book, The Basics of Geopolitics, “The new Eurasian empire will be constructed on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the USA, and the refusal to allow liberal [anarchic] values to dominate us. This common civilizational impulse will be the basis of a political and strategic union.”

Additional written material on Alexander Dugin.

Posted by Alex on Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:50 | #

Interesting commentary from the book on pg. 18-19 about Winfield Scott.    Despite being offered a million dollars by ‘private citizens’ to stay in Mexico with his army and ensure its annexation (which they no doubt call ‘love’), out of concern and love for his own people, he refused to subjugate the Mexican people, which those that promote the Multi-Cult would no doubt call ‘hate’.

They offered me one million of dollars as a bonus, with a salary of 250,000 per annum, and five responsible individuals to become security in any bank in New York which I might name. It would be so arranged that I might get it in five days.

General Winfield Scott

If further proof were wanted that these
things tend to annexation, we have the authority of General
Scott to remove every remaining doubt. In his speech, de-
livered at Sandusky, Oct. 11th, 1852, he said:

” An offer was made to me, to remain in Mexico, and govern it. The
impression which generally prevails, that the proposition emanated from
Congress, is an erroneous one. The overture was made to me by private
citizens — men of wealth and prominence. During our stay in Mexico, our
system of government and police was established, which, as the inhabitants
themselves confessed, gave security — for the first time, perfect and absolute
security — to person and property. About two-fifths of all the branches of
government, including nearly a majority of the members of Congress and the
Executive, were quite desirous of having that country annexed to ours.

“They knew that upon the ratification of the treaty of peace, nineteen
out of twenty of the persons belongiug to the American army would stand
disbanded, and would be absolutely free from all obligations to remain in
the army another moment. They supposed, if they could obtain my ser-
vices, I would retain these twelve or fifteen thousand men, and that I could
easily obtain one hundred thousand more from home. The hope was, that
it would immediately cause annexation. They offered me one million of
dollars as a bonus, with a salary of 250,000 per annum, and five responsi-
ble individuals to become security in any bank in New York which I might
name. It would be so arranged that I might get it in five days. They ex-
pected that annexation would be brought about in a few years, or, if not,
that I could organize the finances, and straighten the complex affairs of that
government. It was understood that nearly a majority of Congress was
in favor of annexation, and that it was only necessary to publish a pronun-
ciamento to that effect to secure the object. We possessed all the arms of
the country, and occupied their cannon-foundries and powder-manufac-
tories, had possession of the fortified places, and could easily have held
them in our possession if this arrangement had gone into effect. A pub-
lished pronunciamento would have brought Congress right over to us, and
with these fifteen thousand Americans holding the fortresses of the country,
all Mexico could not have disturbed us. “We might have been there to
this day if it had been necessary.

” I loved my distant home. I was not in favor of the annexation of
Mexico to my own country. Mexico (Proper) has about eight millions of
inhabitants, and out of these eight millions there are not more than one
million who are of pure European blood. The Indians and mixed races
constitute about seven millions. They are exceedingly inferior to our own.
As a lover of my country, I was opposed to mixing up that race with our
own. This was the first objection on my part to this proposition. May I
plead some little love of home, which gave me the preference for the soil
of my own country and its institutions”.

Posted by Alex on Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:23 | #

Roger Grey or Lurker, or, perhaps someone else with knowledge of this, I’d be very much interested in your elaborating on what you have said.  I’d always heard it was a common expression amongst the English that they ‘should have lost the war’ as then ‘they would have gotten some of the aid’ that was seen to be being showered by the US upon Germany and Japan in the form of the Marshall Plan and such.  Perhaps that was an exagerration of things?

Thanks.

Posted by Alex on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:28 | #

It is one of those curiosities of history that, much like Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, Edward Gibbon’s first volume of The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire was also published in 1776.  If you have the time to read any of Gibbons work on the very Multi-Cultural Rome it is certainly worth the effort   If you look closely, it becomes readily apparent that ancient Rome, amongst certain propronents of the multi-cult, is very much a real turn on to them.  And just like the ancient Romans, the multi-cultists too have their hordes of slaves…in the form of the cheap laborers, aka ‘immigrants’.

‘In hoc signo vincent!’ translates roughly from Latin as ‘In this sign you shall conquer!’

From pg 119...

‘The signs of the times are clear and unmistakable, and
” The New Rome” awakens to her task, and is resolved upon its
execution. Let her raise her banner of stars over land and
sea, the token of perdition to the despots and redemption to
the peoples, who may be convinced : In hoc signo vincent!’

In hoc signo vincent! - Initial US flag raising at Iwo Jima (1945)

...In the fusion of nationalities, we find the integration
of humanity.

The time is past for comparing man to the vermin on the
leaf, of which each species can only infest its particular plant.
History now advances with great strides, to hasten on the day
when all the nations of the earth shall be one people, united
in a single state. No longer a circumscribed portion of lands,
the new ” orbis terrarum” shall encircle the globe ; and as
ancient Rome assembled all the gods of her empire in a single
Pantheon, so shall the ideas of all nations be marshalled into
unity. The signs of the times are clear and unmistakable, and
” The New Rome” awakens to her task, and is resolved upon its
execution. Let her raise her banner of stars over land and
sea, the token of perdition to the despots and redemption to
the peoples, who may be convinced : In hoc signo vincent!

The photograph below is that of General MacArthur accepting the surrender of the Japanese Empire in September, 1945.  The flag in the background is Admiral Perry’s flagship US flag which he had taken with him on his 1853 naval expedition to open up Japan to US trade.  Perry’s flag was brought from the United States and installed on the USS Missouri specifically for the symbolic purpose of being present at the Japanese surrender ceremony.

From pgs 76-77
‘The expedition to Japan and China has already
started on its mission of making a breach for the entrance of
American enterprise into these walled-up magazines of wealth
and civilization.’

The treaty for the acquisition of the Sandwich Islands [Hawaii] is
concluded, and only awaits its ratification. These islands are
the first stopping-place between this continent and Asia;
they can hardly be called, geographically speaking, an Ameri-
can outpost. The expedition to Japan and China has already
started on its mission of making a breach for the entrance of
American enterprise into these walled-up magazines of wealth
and civilization. But the spangled banner will probably find
its first resting-place upon another country of those distant
regions.

Posted by Alex on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:33 | #

On the Jewish people…

pg 103-105

All the world are now Jews;  everybody makes money;  and Rothschild is the ‘sixth great power’...

Liberty and commerce, the essence of their [the Jewish peoples’] character, are also the essence of Americanism…But liberty and commerce, which are the characterisitcs of Judaism and of Americanism, are also those of annexation:  every Jew will hasten to claim the protection of the American flag for his operations over the world, and Rothschild will not shut his eyes to the only prospect of enabling the European states to liquidate the debts they owe him.

7 - The Jews

They whose nationality was their religion, and whose religion was the worship of the Maker of ‘Heaven and Earth and all that is in them is,’ were from the first condemners of that heathenism which ties the super sensuous soul of man to time, place, and sod.    They from the first went forth to conquer and subdue sub-human nature, not to owe fealty to it.    In obedience to this superior principle they have been exiles for two thousand years;  never for a moment doubting that it must come at last to overthrow the grosser influences that seemed for a time triumphant.    During all the middle ages they were persecuted and despised for anticipating the charactersitics of the nineteenth century.    With the first effort of the Germanic idea to cast off the Roman formulas, they were found in the foremost rank of the combatants.    Spinoza was the first who grasped and riddled the fundamental Catholic perversion, the duality between heave and earth, thought and thing, in the last struggle of German research it was Boerne and Heine who circulated as common coin the rich ore dug out by Germanic students.

The day of their deliverance has come;    the Messiah they had a right to expect, if such was the name of their principle.    All the world are now Jews;  everybody makes money;  and Rothschild is the ‘sixth great power,’ at least coordinate with the other five.    The Jews are no longer a peculiar people;  and will soon cease to be a distinct one;  not, however, until they have reaped the rewards of their former toils. 

The idea for some time entertained of purchasing Judea, and making Rothschild a Jewish national king, was one of those fantastic confusions of form and substance which could obtain but a very slight hold upon so rational a people.    They follow a truer instinct in settling in America to enjoy a genuine religious toleration, and an unfeigned equality.    Liberty and commerce, the essence of their character, are also the essence of Americanism.    It is confidently asserted that the Jews contrive to get themselves smuggled out of the Russian Empire, for the purpose of emigrating to the American world.

But liberty and commerce, which are the characterisitcs of Judaism and of Americanism, are also those of annexation:  every Jew will hasten to claim the protection of the American flag for his operations over the world, and Rothschild will not shut his eyes to the only prospect of enabling the European states to liquidate the debts they owe him.

Posted by Alex on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:53 | #

More on individualism in the United States on pgs 37-38...

’...the absolute and indefea-
sible sovereignty of the individual is the all-engrossing
principle of American polity. ‘

The individual is to be subject to no
compulsory influence but its own: the absolute and indefea-
sible sovereignty of the individual is the all-engrossing
principle of American polity. The American state is a
MUTUAL GUARANTEE OF INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY.
It is an American discovery : the very enunciation of the
canon is the work of Josiah Warren, the greatest of American
thinkers. Never before has the individual achieved this high
estate. ” I am myself alone,” is the motto which expresses
English aspirations and American policy. It is this all-suffi-
ciency of the individual which accounts for the marvellous
elasticity of American life. The pioneer, alone upon the
boundless prairie, is conscious of possessing in himself all the
elements that make up the greatness of the American con-
federacy ; and wherever two or three of them are assembled
together, the spirit of American freedom is among them,
teaching them to form an organization more suitable to their
circumstances, freer, and therefore stronger than the old
constitutions of which it is an improved edition.

Posted by Alex on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:19 | #

About the US merchant marine fleet on pgs 84-85.  Below is a press release from May 20, 1945…

‘The Americans, proceed-
ing upon the true principle, that a heavy load of armor in
time of peace absorbs the powers which should be reserved
for the battle, prefer to keep their capital at work in the com-
mercial marine, which will easily furnish materials for war-
fare when required. ‘

‘The commercial marine of America is already
equal to that of England. The tonnage of the
former is given for June 30, 1850, at 3,681,469
While that of the latter is 3,130,000
The ton of the United States is smaller that that of Eng-
land, which will perhaps cancel the difference in numbers ; but
the increase since the taking of the census has certainly been
more rapid in America than in Britain. English sailors are
leaving the service of their ships in such numbers, for the
better pay and perhaps treatment of American captains, that
the English, by their own account, find a difficulty in manning
their line-of-battle ships on short notice. The rats desert the
sinking vessel. The English navy is, indeed, far in advance
of the American ; yet the latter is sufficient for all present
exigencies, and in case of an increased demand, the supply
will not be wanting. The docks can quickly launch as many
ships as will be needed, when the needful in funds and in
materials are so easily obtained. The Americans, proceed-
ing upon the true principle, that a heavy load of armor in
time of peace absorbs the powers which should be reserved
for the battle, prefer to keep their capital at work in the com-
mercial marine, which will easily furnish materials for war-
fare when required.’

Posted by Alex on Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:09 | #

On pg 98 regarding the importation of Chinese cheap laborers to the United States.  In the 19th century the claim was made that the sea coast of the US simply could not be controlled as to mass immigration for cheap labor.    As they are doing now about the borders of variosu countries, they were lying…

’...the day will not be far distant when America will num-
ber more Chinese than Caucasians.’

‘From these relations we may calculate upon an emigration of American business
men to China, in return for that of Chinese laborers to California.’

Chinese ‘cheap labor’ working on California rail road - 1885

In August, the number of Chinese emigrants in California was
estimated at 50,000. The movement has since received a
check from the brutal conduct of the Anglo-Americans ; but
this suspension having operated as an invaluable lesson, and
the Anglos having learned to understand the value of these
patient laborers, and to treat them accordingly, the influx
will soon be greater than ever. If it is as well supported by
the masses of the mother-country, as that from Europe has
been, the day will not be far distant when America will num-
ber more Chinese than Caucasians. An eminent German
geographer, Kapp, now residing in Texas, once said that as
the history of modern times grew out of the invention of
gunpowder, of printing, and the discovery of America, so
most modern history will be governed by steam, electricity,
and the unlocking of China. We may well suppose that the
magazine of civilization for 5000 years will not fail to exert
an influence upon the fledglings who so saucily knock at her
gates. The Chinese in California like the American system
well ; in a recent procession they participated as usual, bear-
ing a banner with the inscription : ” Rush for Republican-
ism.” And they read in republicanism the liberty to earn
their bread. Their plodding propensities make them an
excellent material for the industrial speculations of the
Europeans; the two, between them, will certainly establish
the prosperity of the Pacific state. From these relations
we may calculate upon an emigration of American business
men to China, in return for that of Chinese laborers to California.

Posted by Alex on Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:50 | #

More on ‘cheap labor’ , from India, in addition to what they hoped to be acquiring from China on pg 95...

Indian cheap laborers (aka ‘coolies’)

The term ” impoverished,” taken in connection with the
trifling wages at which Indian labor may be obtained in Aus-
tralia, points out the probability of a large emigration from
that peninsula to the South Sea, and perhaps to California…

Posted by Alex on Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:08 | #

Regarding the history of corporations in North America on pg127...

‘All the colonies were government
enterprises, — corporations…’

The General Motors Logo - A Corporation Now Largely Owned by the US Government

All the colonies were government
enterprises, — corporations. The Plymouth, the Virginia, the
New Amsterdam Company, the Proprietaries, derived their
existence as such, from the government that had chartered
them. The government naturally desired to draw its profits
from its own enterprises ; the colonists naturally desired to
monopolize the fruits of their own labors.