My whole issue with throwing words like gaslighting around is NOT because I care about the dilution of its meaning, it’s about how they construct enemies out of conflict. Like you accuse someone of gaslighting, it implies abuse, which constructs a victim-perpetrator dichotomy out of a conflict which may not have one. Even if someone is wrong and is hurting your feelings, even if they are being shitty and lying, it doesn’t make them an abuser. Hurt feelings and frustration at not being listened to is not the same as abuse. You can be hurt, you can be wronged, without the other person being some type of perpetrator. I think it’s really important to deconstruct these dynamics if we don’t want to use carceral logic to respond to conflict.

dduane:
“othercat2:
“petermorwood:
“trickstertime:
“dresshistorynerd:
“im-the-princess-now:
“paula-of-christ:
“dailyhistorymemes:
“The Choctaw-Irish Brotherhood(via)
” ”
I love stuff like this. Didn’t a tribe in Africa send America some cows after...

The Choctaw-Irish Brotherhood(via)

image

I love stuff like this. Didn’t a tribe in Africa send America some cows after 9/11? Like this is holy and the most valuable thing we have. We hear your suffering and want to do anything in our power to help

It was not a potato famine. The famine didn’t happen because of the potato yeald failing. Ireland was actually producing more than enough food. However it was almost all land owned by Brittish landowners, who took all of the food out of the country to sell in UK. Potato was what the Irish farmers ate, because it was cheep and could be produced in worst parts of the land, where more profitable food couldn’t be grown. When there were no longer potatos, the decision for the farmers was to either starve and sent the food as rent to the landlords or loose their homes and then starve.

The Brittish goverment was unwilling to do anything for two reasons. First was the laissez-faire capitalistic ideology, that put the rights of property owners to make profits above human lives. Rent freeze was unthinkable and they even were unwilling to do proper relief efforts as free food would lower the cost of food. The second reason was distain for the Irish, and the thought that they were “breeding too much” and the famine was a natural way to trim down the population, aka genocidal reasoning.

This is why it’s important to stress it was not a potato famine. The potato blinght was all over Europe but only in Ireland there was a famine. The reasons behind it had nothing to do with potatos and everything to do with the Brittish.

Apparently what made Choctaw want to offer relief to Irish was the news about the Doolough Tragedy. Hundreds of starving people were gathered for inspection to verify they were entitled to recieve relief. The officials would for *some reason* not do that and instead left to a hunting lodge 19 kilometers away to spend the night and said to the starvqing people they would have to walk there by morning to be inspected. The weather conditions were terrible and many of them died completely needlessly during the walk thoroung day and night.

This apparently reminded the Choctaw of their own very recent (and much more explicit and bigger scale) experiences of ethnic clensing, where they were forcibly relocated. It was basically a death march and thousands of Choctaw died from the terrible conditions also completely needlessly.

In 2015 a memorial named Kindred Spirits was installed in Southern Ireland to commemorate the Chactow donation.


image

“The English never remember, the Irish never forget.”

“Never forget” is often seen (guess who by?) as a Bad Thing.

This is self-evidently not always the case.

I have always wanted to see a movie made about the Choctaw sending money to the Irish during The Great Hunger. (Written/directed by a Choctaw by preference or even a collaboration with an Irish director.) How they learned about it, how they decided to do it, and outsider pov reactions to their donation effort.

An added note: the Famine was a tremendously complex episode in our history, worth investigating in detail. Still arguably the best-detailed look at it can be found in Cecil Woodham-Smith’s The Great Hunger.

I’m never a fan of the “bisexual people aren’t sluts and are monogamous too” respectability angle but the rest of the article felt good to read.

I was just out in 2016 and the way the media painted Amber Heard was really hurtful, and these emotions have been reactivated by the BS around the trial.

Do NOT use Facebook or Messenger to discuss self managing abortion or to communicate your intentions to have an abortion in any way. Especially do not do this if you live in a state that bans self managed abortion, abortion via telehealth, or accessing abortion pills by mail.

I would refrain from using WhatsApp too, considering it belongs to Facebook now. Use another encrypted messaging service, the best/most reliable being Signal, but any messaging app that doesn’t have access to the code to decrypt your messages and doesn’t store your messages will do.

And delete the messages once you’re done using the information in them. Signal won’t give the cops access to your messages - they can’t decrypt the code themselves - but a cop might get access to your phone or the phone of the people helping you, and thus get the proofs they need.


asker portrait
pinkqwilfish asked:

so at my new job there’s been a lot of confusion over my gender (which as an enby is great) but somehow in the confusion my coworkers came to assume I’m a trans man and even though I’m AMAB I’ve used the confusion as leverage to get them to put tampons/pads in the men’s room and add a gender neutral bathroom for any transmascs/enbies down the line and I kept thinking “this is like the ‘my gender is whatever makes the joke funnier’ thing but the opposite??” and anyway tldr here is my “My gender is” alignment chart

image

doubleca5t:

Oh this is amazing so many of these are a mood

reblogging for the chart, clearly a mood

This might be the funniest reply I’ve ever seen in my life

image

Finland and Estonia urge EU to stop issuing tourist visas to Russians

Finland and Estonia urge EU to stop issuing tourist visas to Russians

The post Finland and Estonia urge EU to stop issuing tourist visas to Russians appeared first on TD (Travel Daily Media) Travel Daily.

The prime ministers of Estonia and Finland have called on the EU to stop issuing tourist visas to Russians in an attempt to open up a new sanctions front following Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Finland — which, like Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania,…


image

View On WordPress

So this in happening right now and I feel some type of way about it

I do take into account the fact that Russia has been a threat to the region for centuries, I really do - however, I need us to remember that tourist visas are also sometimes used as a way to leave the country in case of an immediate threat, before asking for asylum.

Considering the situation now in Russia and other republics of the Federation for gay people, this option is just plain bad for me. I just started volunteering at an LGBTQ+ refugee organization, helping people navigate the asylum seeking process, and we’re meeting more and more gay couples from Russia in the last few months.

Of course the State (whether Estonian, Finnish or in my case, French) wouldn’t care about that, cause it values borders over human lives. But as European citizens, we should keep that in mind

I also saw an article somewhere that made a good point: if Russian citizens can’t visit Western Europe or other places in the world, how are they going to be confronted to information about Ukraine that isn’t Russian State propaganda?

1 2 3 4 5 Next