“It is well-established by Pinker and other scientists that women have higher IQs on average, while men preponderate the extremes of brilliance and dullness.”

This is not only not “well-established,” it is false. On the contrary, there is some evidence that the average adult male IQ is slightly higher. Ask Lynn, Thompson, who are not amateurs.

Say ANON, why do you think I should respond to insults from someone without a name?

As for you’re ignorance of the Pope’s anti-reproductive policy for Europeans, why argue about it here? Why not demonstrate that you have an IQ at least slightly higher than that of a water melon by checking the news reports.

Here I’ll give you a start:

From Voice of the Family an initiative of Catholic laity

IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS: PAPAL SUPPORT FOR UN 2030 AGENDA POSES IMMEDIATE THREAT TO LIVES OF CHILDREN

I think you said in one of your comments that you had had “a short fuse”. I don’t see that you have changed from what I read of your intemperate language and ill considered snap judgments.

You have not the slightest reason to suppose that I “revere” the Pope and in fact my atheist indifference to the core of his mission means that I am unaware of his one child policy for Europe. Actually I think you are making that up, presumably in a paddy after your short fuse ignited something.

More embarrassing for you: you didn’t even sense the possibility of irony.

Tucker Carlson: why Google is an evil company that cannot be trusted as a source of information:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APc68QzHl74

hahahaaaa. Well done!

is precisely the insight which might be further enhanced by Ecce Homo.

It’s hard to imagine any insight being enhanced by Nietzsche, or German philosophy in general, which reminds me both of this Monty Python sketch, and Ludwig Boltzmann’s remarks on the subject:

To go straight to the deepest depth, I went for Hegel; what unclear thoughtless flow of words I was to find there! My unlucky star led me from Hegel to Schopenhauer … Even in Kant there were many things that I could grasp so little that given his general acuity of mind I almost suspected that he was pulling the reader’s leg or was even an imposter.

But at least Boltzmann did not have to contend with the loonie drivel of Martin Heidegger, which may have been even more obscure than Nietzsche at his raving looniest.

So long as we debate the question of ownership, [a transient concept, as is everything under the Sun, given sufficient passage of time] there are essentially three aspects, (a) provenance or pedigree of claim, (b) labour, capital and nurture expended on it, and (c) ability to protect it and further the progress of economic endeavour for the world at large. On the first count, if you are of the people of the Book, the answer to that question is not sub-judice. Furthermore, recorded history of the past three centuries establishes unbroken Jewish presence in the land. True Palestinians are part of the land, but they must acquiesce to the sovereign. On the second count, the results are manifest. On the third, as with all things in life, it remains to be seen, but I like the chances.

Perhaps you need to make up your mind as to which argument, standard-issue morality or labour-endeavour, you propose to use as lodestar when determining the ownership of nation-states. It appeared you weren’t invoking standard-issue morality, yet when presented with an unambiguous assertion of its absence from this pen, you resort to morality or at least re-introduce it for reasons unknown! Nietzsche in Ecce Homo can help, but warning! He takes the reader on a sly trip.

What you write:

If the Jews manage to hold onto Palestine, I will be the first to admit that they won it fair as square. But to suggest that they deserved to own Palestine is to make a mockery of morality. Indeed, morality has no place whatever in assessing the behavior of competitive groups where winning means living to fight another day, and losing means extinction.

is precisely the insight which might be further enhanced by Ecce Homo.

Photoshopped fake image.

nope

the toddler’s name is Sahar Salman Abu Namous

here are more pictures of what the ‘shining light unto nations’ does to Palestinian children

>>warning<<

I don't know if this particular boy was specifically targeted or not, but we do know for a fact that the IDF (brave heroes) do target young boys all the time. Here's some boys who were murdered for playing on a beach.

It is a definitive “own”.

Until someone definitively kicks them out, whereupon they will definitively not “own”, neither will they, according to you, have any moral claim to own, any more than the Palestinians who used to own and who planted the olive groves the Israelis have destroyed.

So really, all you’re saying is that the Israelis hold the land by conquest and will continue to do so, until they don’t, what they built being, in fact, irrelevant as to the question of ownership or moral right.

Photoshopped fake image.

Wittgenstein is my guide here, and, if I wanted I would’ve inserted the “should”. It is a definitive “own”.

Look at this Headline from the BBC:

A worrying statistic for the tech industry was revealed in freshly-released A-level data – only 9.8% of those completing a computing course were girls.

Silly buggers. What’s worrying about the fact that many girls don’t want to do the same things as many boys want to do? Nothing, obvioulsy, unless your one of the perverts at Buggering British Children. Then you probably hate the fact that all little girls aren’t little boys.

That Google is pushing the same bullshit that girls should differ in no way psychologically from boys and if they do its a problem to be fixed, is proof, if anyone needed it that, among other probably evil things, Google is a toxic propaganda agency.

But the good news is that the moron Google CEO, Pichai, hasn’t resigned, despite being called a liar by the New York Times, so we can expect more stupidly bad PR from Google in the future, which will further damage their brand and warn people to avoid using their services.

But anyway, what the Hell are Google doing with a male CEO? That sure sends a toxic message to every female in the land, at least according to the toxic message Google wishes you to swallow.

where does Trump stand? Is he just a floundering fool, a Money Power puppet, or is he, as some may have supposed, a genuine nation-state conservative? And if the latter, what is his plan for the survival of the American nation-state and its fast declining European majority

IDK CanS,

one thing I can tell you is that he’s better than Hillary would have been.

OMG did we all dodge a bullet there!

and I fear that if he ends up being really successful, that the deepstate will do something awful to fuck it all up. Perhaps the Fed can arrange for a stock market collapse, or some other trick.

but for now, I still have hope, and that is an amazing thing in this day in age. When the Fiend is running around destroying nation after nation, and trying its level best to create hellish strife in the heart of Europe and in America’s heartland.

if Trump can just keep the peace and keep the economy afloat, that’d perhaps be a miracle in itself

cheers

IMHO

IMHO, I suspect you’re right.

I tried to visualize a settlement of the Israel/Palestine conflict that, by securing Israel, could end the Money Power war on the Western nations. But my proposal has the fatal flaw that it leaves the Money Power and its drive for global domination intact and in control of the US Government.

But if that’s the case, where does Trump stand? Is he just a floundering fool, a Money Power puppet, or is he, as some may have supposed, a genuine nation-state conservative? And if the latter, what is his plan for the survival of the American nation-state and its fast declining European majority.

I don’t question that much money is being spent in Soros’s name to undermine the Western nations and to destroy Western civilization. I just question whether money spent in Soros’s name is really Soros’s money rather than US taxpayers’s money for the illegal disbursement of which Soros provides the cover. Soros is rich, but you don’t destroy a civilization with an annual tithe on twenty billion, or whatever Soros is worth.

Building, inventing, innovating, cultivating, loving the land, have precious nothing to do with morality.

No, but when you say:

I believe a people which build the metropolis, invent the technologies, turn the desert bountiful and create a culture for their children to love, cherish, and nurture in the days ahead, own the land.

You inject your own morality with an implicit “should.”

Building, inventing, innovating, cultivating, loving the land, have precious nothing to do with morality.

moderators, please only make this picture available by clicking on the link

>>warning<<

[MORE]

this is how the Zionists love and cultivate and show their 'shining light unto the nations… "morality"

American Jews either to emigrate to Israel or become America Firsters not American traitors.

are you j0king?

the history of ‘the Jews’ is long and storied. When during that history have the Jews ever been loyal to their host Gentiles, over the interests of ‘the tribe’?

a few individuals perhaps, for sure. (am I the only one who sees shades of Roy Cohn in Steven Miller?)

but on the whole, they’ll never be able to forsake the Sandra Bernhard, George Soros wing of their DNA. It’s too hardwired. I’d like to think you’re right, but alas, I fear that is just too Pollyanna.

The big losers are (1) the neoCons and their media and Congressional ilk who will never get over the lost opportunity to use America as the tool with which to conquer to world for Jewish Money-Power-mediated world supremacy; (2) the Palestinians.

so you think they’d make common cause with David Duke if they could finally get rid of the Pals?

whitey could once again be ascendant and hopeful and thrive and prosper and frolic in the meadows of America…

no longer a murderous racist to his core, but now a loving, wonderful partner in a new and shinning America with a white future?

lol

((They’d)) rather have Armageddon

It seems to me that Palestine is lost to the Palestinians, just as a large chunk of the West may already have been lost to the Third World.

I suspect that inadvertently (a Freudian slip?) you’ve noticed a common thread. We in the West can not sacrifice the Palestinians to the pyres of Moloch in order to buy our future from the Fiend.

our fates are intertwined. We are- both of us groups, the Palestinians and the white race- being genocided by the very same Fiend, and it will not be sated with a few Arab lives or ethnic cleansing. No. In fact it will never be sated, ever. Indeed, with every feast it slathers down its gapping maw, it grows more and more hungry. Its appetite increases with every nation ground into the dirt and millions of lives destroyed. It is a drooling beast with a life of its own, and the more you feed it, the more murderous and demonic it becomes. You can’t make deals with it, and say, ‘how bout we give you the Palestinians?’, will that sate your dripping maw for the moment’, and ‘sure’ it will answer, but by now if you don’t know that everything it says is a lie, then you don’t know the Fiend.

First, the West might provide a preferential immigration policy for Palestinians, of whom many, and one would hope virtually all, would move to Europe, North America, Latin America, and Australia, where they would no doubt prosper and, furthermore, provide some counterbalance to undue Jewish influence in the West.

now you’re being silly

a counterbalance? The Palestinian diaspora? lol

Second, the West might seek a deal with one of the North African states to transfer to the Palestinians 20,000 km2 of territory to build New Palestine, in return for which the Western nations would pay something like $20 billion for the land.

you really don’t understand them do you?

if the world agreed tomorrow to resettle every single Palestinian into Norway, and gave Israel the Golan Heights and even vouchsafed Greater Israel to the world’s Jews, ‘from the Nile to the Euphrates’, and funded the rebuilding of the third temple on the Temple Mount, and got down on their hands and knees and licked their feet clean….

that would only embolden them, and they’d demand more. That’s their nature my friend. And I suspect that the more honest among them would even admit it.

In fact it was a Jew himself- Benjamin Freedman- who opened my eyes, and gave me the red pill.

No, what the world’s people need to do, is realize that we’re all in this together. We all need to repudiate the war pigs and criminals. We need to find a way to send Tony Blair to the Hague, and then the rest of them.

We need to protect the lives and futures of the Palestinian people more than anyone else. They are our canary in the global coal mine, and as they go, so too will we.

We need to leash the Fiend, not feed it.

will that be possible?

only when enough of the world’s people understand what is going on. Only when the movement to audit the Fed (the fount of their demonic power) gains sufficient grass-roots support that we can finally wrest control of our governments back from the money boyz.

what we must not do, is toss the Palestinians under the bus. Not only would that be a sin, but you don’t free yourself from a Fiend by handing it someone weaker. You make common cause with all the victims of the Fiend, and together you stand united against it.

IMHO

Just about everything said in the political realm is either an outright lie or a piece of stinking hypocrisy. But you cannot win the war by engaging in the debate

it’s enough for me to tell the simple truth. I don’t expect that to win any wars, but it’s cathartic for me, and at least I’m one more voice exposing the devil’s lies.

The objective, clearly is genocide.

So what to do?

yep

and good question…

What remains to be seen is what Trump will do with the power he has acquired. His relationship with the conflicting parties, the Jews and other elements of the Money Power on the one hand, and America’s blue collar class on the other hand is interesting.

very much so

Which raises the question, how does Trump resolve his commitments to both Jewish interests and white American interests?

extremely salient question indeed, since they seem to be mutually exclusive

It seems to me that the only possible resolution is by (a) working to strengthen Israel as the permanent, and permanently secure, home of the Jews, while (b) adopting an America first immigration and trade policy.

sounds good, but the only problems is that the US gov is already doing everything it can to bolster Israel’s fortunes in any way that it can. Billions of dollars in aid, any military aid they ask for, running cover at the UN, giving them white phosphorus to use on Gaza, and basically anything Israel wants.

So now what Israel has been demanding is that the US also destroy all the countries in the Middle East and elsewhere who don’t bow down to Jewish supremacist money power. And so we’ve been doing that, spending trillion$ slaughtering and murdering and maiming millions of men, women and children, just like those Old Testament quotes you provided.

But it’s not enough. We have to finish off Syria. They want the Golan Heights and they will force a nuclear war with Russia (and the US of course! the cowards don’t like to fight their own wars) in order to steal it.

And that’s where we’re at.

This, it seems to me, could work. It creates conditions for the restoration of the fertility of EuroAmericans, while encouraging American Jews either to emigrate to Israel or become America Firsters not American traitors.

there’s something I don’t think you understand. Sure they hate the Muslims and they privately mock the schwarzes as sub-humans. But who they really hate are the white Europeans. Or, more specifically, the white European men who shut down their brothels in Berlin, which were full of white European children. So under some circumstances, they’re quite fond of white flesh, but not the kind that is filled with the blood and vigor of Europe’s ancestors. Which always puts the kibosh on their party. That kind of white, European they want dead and in the grave (or at least with a boot stamping on his face). And it’s a manifest obsession. They don’t take a breath that isn’t full to the brim with pure hatred for straight-standing white men. Make no mistake, we’re all nothing but dormant Nazis to them, and they want us all marginalized and emasculated more than even their hatred for Muslims. Whom they always use to destroy white societies, going all the way back to Moorish Spain, where the Jews opened the gates to hundreds of years of slavery, genocide and oppression.

If they could do the same to every last bastion of white civilization, do you think they’d hesitate for a second?

Even, I suspect, (because their hatred is that all-consuming), even if it meant their own destruction. They’re like the blacks in Zimbabwe, (or the scorpion with the frog) who have made it clear that even if it means they’ll starve, they don’t care. They still demand the end of white existence from their purview.

to really understand how much they hate us, just consider the case of Channon Christian, (or that twelve year old boy who was burned alive with a blowtorch – that no one has heard of).

when certain types of crimes happen, and they’re obviously racially charged, you can glimmer a lot about our ((media masters)) by how they cover such stories. When white men (don’t) gang rape a black girl at Duke, it’s headline news from the length and breath of their bullhorns and newspapers. It’s on TV and politicians and university deans and everywhere there is hysteria and “outrage!”

Same for Travon or Michael Brown or any other non-crime that can be hysterically used to demonize whites as murderous racists…

but let some white girl (named Christian!) watch her boyfriend raped and tortured to death, and then set on fire, only as the horrifying prologue for what she’s about to endure, for many hours, until she was stuffed in a garbage bag and slowly suffocated to death. And there’s silence.

deathly silence

yet I hear a thunderous meaning coming from that silence, and it says to me…

‘we like what happened to those white racists and anti-Semites’

‘we even get off on that kind of thing’

that’s what I hear, loud and clear.

and, that they’d like to see a lot more of that kind of ‘justice’, as they see it.

OR, they’d report on it. Wouldn’t they? And the reason they don’t report on it…. is because by doing so, it might make the next white couple a tiny bit more suspicious of the diversity around them, and that such events would then be a little less frequent. Like the Wichita massacre for instance. So, they hush up such crimes, because they obviously want to see more of them. Duh.

And that is why I can’t get behind your idea that they’d ever be sanguine about creating “conditions for the restoration of the fertility of EuroAmericans”.

before they’d allow that, they see Israel pushed into the sea. They’d see a nuclear holocaust that would destroy all life on this planet, before they’d ever sign off on a future where they share the planet with thriving and ascendant ‘Nazis and Christians. (redundant from their point of view)

perhaps I’m wrong about that, but I feel I can glimmer much more what people don’t say, (by their booming silence) than by what they do say [usually lies ; ]

since this post is getting too long, I’m going to reply to the rest of your fine comment in another post…

Building, inventing, innovating, cultivating, loving the land, have precious nothing to do with morality.

I am skeptical of your claim that Soros invests in any of those things.

Leaked George Soros Plan to Turn Ireland into a Pro-Abortion Country

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/08/01/leaked-george-soros-plan-to-turn-ireland-into-a-pro-abortion-country/)

Soros Investing 500 million in migrants

http://archive.is/nrMRC

the globalist manipulators have no trouble with a 100+ IQ populace.

But they do. The whole thing is getting wobbly and the only thing they know after passing 10 billion “dollars” is ecstasy and fear. “The things you own end up owning you”.

the senile old fool is merely a front for the CIA

The CIA is working for his masters. Again, for them, it’s not about the money. It’s about power/fear.

But whatever do you mean by Jews attempting to suppress the Theory of Evolution?

That’s not exactly what I said. What I said was:

Perhaps it is because Jews wish to keep an understanding of how evolution works to themselves that the Unz Review publishes Fred Reed’s nonsense articles on the subject.

Even that, I admit, sounds slightly paranoid. But you have to admit that if my general thesis about the NWO being a largely Jewish Money Power project (and there is considerable substance to that contention, though of course not all Jews are on board, the late James Goldsmith to name but one of many), then an understanding of the elementary process of natural selection and the elementary math that underlies population replacement, is not something they (i.e., globalist, Money Power, New World Ordure Jews) would want ordinary folk to be thinking about as they, the above-mentioned Jews (working with miscellaneous others, including the indigenous treason class — as did many of the barons, more than a thousand years ago, when Alfred the Great was struggling to fend of the Viking invasion of England), go about the destruction of the European nation states, which represent the greatest impediment to the globalization project.

Mostly, though, relating to the matter of Fred on Evolution, I simply don’t understand, as someone who was a publisher for 25 years, Unz’s policy of not acknowledging receipt of what I think was a competently organized article, especially as I have drawn it to his attention multiple times. What’s the matter with the guy? He didn’t have to accept it. He could have said “due to insufficient space, etc.” or some other bullshit.

As a practical matter, I believe a people which build the metropolis, invent the technologies, turn the desert bountiful and create a culture for their children to love, cherish, and nurture in the days ahead, own the land.

That, to an evolutionist, is absolute twaddle. The inheritors of the earth are, for the most part, descendants of the most aggressive thieves, rapists, murderers, con artists, and honey-tongued manipulators. If the Jews manage to hold onto Palestine, I will be the first to admit that they won it fair as square. But to suggest that they deserved to own Palestine is to make a mockery of morality. Indeed, morality has no place whatever in assessing the behavior of competitive groups where winning means living to fight another day, and losing means extinction.

Maximising corporate profits is a side-benefit. The main goal is to dis-empower the white race and prepare them for replacement. You should have recognised this when the talking heads invented the “empowerment” buzz-word. The NWO is not meant to deal with a 100+ IQ populace.

That seems pretty confused thinking. I’m sure that the globalist manipulators have no trouble with a 100+ IQ populace. Look at what they’ve done already to Sweden, Germany, France, Britain, and the US! All they have to do is buy the leadership, scum like the Blairs and Clintons who have made hundreds of millions out of political bribe-taking.

The Money Power seeks to destroy the nation state, the more easily to incorporate the resultant racially and culturally incoherent post-national state into a global system, the strings of which can be pulled, unnoticed, by the Money Power.

Do you really believe that Soros is investing into third-wave feminism, abortion and borderless immigration (all designed to hurt the white race) to gain a monetary profit from it?

I am skeptical of your claim that Soros invests in any of those things. I strongly suspect that the senile old fool is merely a front for the CIA or some such agency. Do you really think he’d piss away his own money financing uppity blacks and bonkers women?

You are interpreting my response on G’d gifts far too literally. As a practical matter, I believe a people which build the metropolis, invent the technologies, turn the desert bountiful and create a culture for their children to love, cherish, and nurture in the days ahead, own the land. Jews have lived there longer and more productively than any other. Now, that doesn’t forbid an accommodation for Palestinians, densely populated as the land is, but such a project demands a careful eye to separate the troublemakers from the worthy.

I read through your piece criticising Fred, and of course, it succeeds as a valid criticism! But Fred wasn’t attempting to construct a general theory of Everything, was he? The man’s a mountebank and lives to push his readers. But whatever do you mean by Jews attempting to suppress the Theory of Evolution? Sorry mate, you lost me there.

A primary objective of Jewish-influence is a global system dominated by the Money Power. That means off-shoring of manufacturing from the West to the Rest, thereby maximizing corporate profits, while opening the borders of the West to the Rest to utterly destroy the prosperity of the Western peoples through the import of cheap labor.

Maximising corporate profits is a side-benefit. The main goal is to dis-empower the white race and prepare them for replacement. You should have recognised this when the talking heads invented the “empowerment” buzz-word. The NWO is not meant to deal with a 100+ IQ populace.

Do you really believe that Soros is investing into third-wave feminism, abortion and borderless immigration (all designed to hurt the white race) to gain a monetary profit from it? For him, and his masters, the money is no object – it’s the water they breathe.

“I fancied myself as some kind of god … If truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.“ When asked by Britain’s Independent newspaper to elaborate on that statement, Soros doubled down: “It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.“

http://archive.is/Imj9Y

Despite his reputation as an international philanthropist, Soros occasionally becomes candid about his real nature. “I am sort of a deus ex machina,” Soros told the New York Times in 1994. “I am something unnatural. I’m very comfortable with my public persona because it is one I have created for myself. It represents what I like to be as distinct from what I really am. You know, in my personal capacity I’m not actually a selfless philanthropic person. I’m very much self-centered.”

http://archive.is/LRxHu

It seems to me that the only possible resolution is by (a) working to strengthen Israel as the permanent, and permanently secure, home of the Jews, while (b) adopting an America first immigration and trade policy.

Agree.

Rurik,

I think you win the argument but lose the war.

Just about everything said in the political realm is either an outright lie or a piece of stinking hypocrisy. But you cannot win the war by engaging in the debate.

The US is, and always has been, a plutocracy with a democratic facade. Today, the majority of richest Americans are Jews, so Jews have a disproportionate influence over American policy, both domestic and foreign.

That Jewish influence is mediated not only via Congress, the courts, and academia, but by way of a huge globe-spanning network of megaphones: the Western world’s news media, book publishing, entertainments, pornography, and Internet-related industries.

A primary objective of Jewish-influence is a global system dominated by the Money Power. That means off-shoring of manufacturing from the West to the Rest, thereby maximizing corporate profits, while opening the borders of the West to the Rest to utterly destroy the prosperity of the Western peoples through the import of cheap labor.

An intended result of the implementation of this policy has been the destruction the fertility of the Western nations through sharp reductions in incomes and a huge increase in competition for living space, particularly housing. Then, just to be quite sure, there’s compulsory sex “education” whereby adult teachers, perverts all, one has to assume, teach elementary school kids buggery and how to suck cock.

The objective, clearly is genocide.

So what to do?

Use the machinery of fake democracy and make it into a real democracy by mobilizing the blue collar and lower middle classes politically. That’s what Hitler did, it’s what Donald Trump has done.

What remains to be seen is what Trump will do with the power he has acquired. His relationship with the conflicting parties, the Jews and other elements of the Money Power on the one hand, and America’s blue collar class on the other hand is interesting.

Trump is, so it has been claimed, of Jewish extraction, which seems likely, and his daughter is Jewish by conversion. So Trump is clearly in the Jewish camp. However, Trump’s mother, née Mary Anne McLeod, was a pure-blooded Celt, born on the Island of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides of Scotland. Moreover, Trump gives every indication of loyalty and affection for his mother’s people and perhaps, therefore, for the poor immigrants from all over Europe who created the American settler state and whose descendants make up the majority of America’s oppressed blue collar class.

Certainly, it was his appeal to the blue collar class, white, black and khaki, that won Trump election and it will be his ability to deliver on his promises to them that the success or failure of his presidency will be judged. Which raises the question, how does Trump resolve his commitments to both Jewish interests and white American interests?

It seems to me that the only possible resolution is by (a) working to strengthen Israel as the permanent, and permanently secure, home of the Jews, while (b) adopting an America first immigration and trade policy.

This, it seems to me, could work. It creates conditions for the restoration of the fertility of EuroAmericans, while encouraging American Jews either to emigrate to Israel or become America Firsters not American traitors.

The big losers are (1) the neoCons and their media and Congressional ilk who will never get over the lost opportunity to use America as the tool with which to conquer to world for Jewish Money-Power-mediated world supremacy; (2) the Palestinians.

It seems to me that Palestine is lost to the Palestinians, just as a large chunk of the West may already have been lost to the Third World. However, there are less than five million Palestinians in Israel and the occupied territories, and their fate can be greatly improved in at least two ways.

First, the West might provide a preferential immigration policy for Palestinians, of whom many, and one would hope virtually all, would move to Europe, North America, Latin America, and Australia, where they would no doubt prosper and, furthermore, provide some counterbalance to undue Jewish influence in the West.

Second, the West might seek a deal with one of the North African states to transfer to the Palestinians 20,000 km2 of territory to build New Palestine, in return for which the Western nations would pay something like $20 billion for the land. This presumably would be mostly unoccupied desert, so a price of $10,000 per hectare would seem reasonable although there would be additional payment for existing improvements. In addition, the West would commit to investing $1 trillion over ten years, this cash to be split equally between New Palestine and the country selling the territory. This investment, a rather trivial amount relative to, say, the US military budget, would go for massive solar-powered water desalination plants, cropland and urban infrastructure development.

Might not Egypt buy into such a project? Would it not be a terrific deal to grant one third of the Sinai to the Palestinians, while seeing two-thirds of the Sinai developed as a high tech urban/agricultural zone accommodating millions of Egypt’s teaming masses in cities of superb architectural design, equipped with among the world’s the finest educational and research facilities, and surrounded by thousands of square kilometers of the world’s most advanced agricultural production systems?

Haha, flawless.

G’d is not the real-estate agent; he is the owner of all and gives a people what He feels they deserve.

Sam,

That old scoundrel Yahweh did not give Jews the Promised land, he told them to go steal it and kill every one of the original inhabitants:

When the Lord your God brings you into the land where you are entering to possess it, and clears away many nations before you…you shall utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them and show no favor to them. Furthermore, you shall not intermarry with them…. For they will turn your sons away from following Me to serve other gods. Then the anger of the Lord will be kindled against you and He will quickly destroy you. But thus you shall do to them: You shall tear down their altars, and smash their sacred pillars, and hew down their Asherim, and burn their graven images with fire. (Deut. 7:1-5)

Only in the cities of these peoples that the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, you shall not leave alive anything that breathes. But you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittite and the Amorite, the Canaanite and the Perizzite, the Hivite and the Jebusite, as the Lord your God has commanded you, so that they may not teach you to do according to all their detestable things which they have done for their gods, so that you would sin against the Lord your God. (Deut. 20.16-18)

Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’” (1 Sam 15:2-3)

Perhaps it is because Jews wish to keep an understanding of how evolution works to themselves that the Unz Review publishes Fred Reed’s nonsense articles on the subject, while refusing to publish, or even to acknowledge receipt of, a rebuttal.

he is the owner of all and gives a people what He feels they deserve.

https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005143

INTRODUCTION TO THE HOLOCAUST

he is the owner of all and gives a people what He feels they deserve.

That’s true. But America is the ancient land of the Amerindians. Canada is the ancient … etc.

Stealing other people’s land is what people have been doing since time immemorial

all true

but then something was supposed to have been decided once and for all at Nuremburg, when the horrified world decided to codify into law certain principles, like a repudiation of genocide for instance, and a respect for the Rule of Law, and International Law, and human rights, and so on.

Consider, if we humans really didn’t learn anything from WWII, and ‘might’ really does = ‘right’,

and it’s OK for the Jews to murder and steal the land of others….

well then guess what else that means?

it means that the Nazis hand’s were clean. And that they did nothing wrong when they ethnically cleansed the Jews out, and murdered some of them in the process.

If, what the Zionists have been, and are doing in Palestine is OK = then everything the Nazi did was certainly OK, because for one thing, the Nazis were murdering and expelling foreigners (who were graciously allowed to settle in Germany in the first place) out of their own lands, whereas the Jews are murdering and expelling Palestinians out of the Palestinian’s own lands.

So if it’s OK for the Zionists to murder Palestinians and steal their land, then by what metric has the world been barraged with all this sanctimonious hysteria about evil ‘Nazis’ all this time?

Why is Germany harangued and demonized, even today’s generation for something they had nothing to do with, when the people demonizing them are engaging in the very same behavior themselves? Only worse.

And yet people don’t see this raging double standard, and mock every Jew anywhere who cries crocodile tears over the Holocaust, as he shoots another Palestinian child from a rooftop.

I for one find the self-righteous sanctimony intolerable, and enjoy pointing it out. The Jews have used the Holocaust to blackmail the world into being actual guilty participants to a genocidal holocaust of the Palestinians, and they are certainly behind the wars in the Middle East today, and yet they still put on airs of victimhood, and our politicians grovel at their feet. It’s all so disgusting it makes me sick to my stomach.

But in Palestine, it’s game over — barring some unpredictable catastrophe for the Israelis

that’s it?

you’re a thoughtful and educated and intelligent fellow, and that’s all you’ve got to offer vis-a-vis the troubles over there? What about Gaza? Should they just commit mass-suicide and be done with it?

What about the occupied territories? Should the world continue to look the other way, as these horribly persecuted people are driven into the dirt?

Should the American people continue to be taxed to the tune of billions to continue funding genocide and murder?

Should we continue to send specially built Caterpillar bulldozers that are used even for crushing and murdering idealistic young American girls?

We all know that the politicians are craven worms who serve at the pleasure of snakes like Sheldon Adelson, but certainly ‘we the people’ can point out the devil’s lies at places like Unz.. elsewhere.

Personally I’d like to see a one state solution imposed on Israel, with defined borders and equal rights for all the inhabitants of that land. IOW exactly what the Jews of the world demanded for S. Africa, or Rhodesia [now Zimbabwe]

If it’s good enough for the goyim, it should be good enough for ‘the shinning light unto the voirld’, no?

If the Brits don’t kick the bastards out now, they’ll lose their country.

when you say bastards, I hope you’re referring to every single politician and media personality and all the rest who were and still are against Brexit. If Tony Blair were found dangling from a lamppost tomorrow morning, with a sign reading ‘traitor’ around his neck, I’d have more respect for the British people than I’ve ever been able to muster in my entire life.

These are the people who, since the beginning of the industrial revolution despised the common people of England

more to the point, they’re Jews

so you have any doubt that Rothschild is more powerful than any Prime Minister?

So they find these traitorous scum like Tony Blair- and that Swedish guy, and they elevate them to positions of power, so that they can have a goyim take all the blame for destroying England- and Sweden respectively.

‘it’s good for the Jews’

No, the only thing that might save the British people will be something with more than a passing resemblance to Nazism

well, I’m not sure the Nazis even had a passing resemblance to ‘Nazism’; as it’s mashed in our collective faces day in, day out. The ‘Nazis’ have replaced the devil in today’s popular conscience for the ultimate evil. And one thing I can assure you, is that if a politician or leader were to ever actually offer the British people some slight hope of holding on to what’s left of their island nation, then he or she will absolutely be subject to a chorus of screeching Nazi!! the likes of which it’s impossible to overstate. Trump is so marinated in NYC Jewish culture that he’s best buddies with Bibi, and his daughter and grandchildren are Jews. And yet they screech “Nazi”!! at Trump relentlessly. Putin is a Russian nationalist, who surely hates WWII Nazis as only a Russian nationalist can, and yet they screech “Nazi’ at him, just because he stopped going along with their plan to destroy seven countries in the middle east. For that, now he too is a ‘Nazi! Putin = Adolf Hitler!!!

(it’s really quite funny, were it not so tragic)

Just imagine what they’d say if an actual British patriot ever got close to the levers of power in England. There would be screeching hysterics like those sound cannons they use to survey for oil in the oceans, and which blows marine life’s ear drums out from miles away.

Just imagining the psychotic hysteria and eardrum-shattering cacophony, it might be easier just to say goodbye to England… her history (that will all be rewritten to demonize all of England and the Brits as liars and thieves and, of course ‘racists!), and goodbye to the British race, who’ll be blended away for all time, even occasionally with consent.

at least you won’t be racists

That’s a function of the inarticulateness of those to whom you’ve made that half-baked remark. G’d is not the real-estate agent; he is the owner of all and gives a people what He feels they deserve.

To my Jewish friends and Christian zionists that insist that Israel is Jewish land, given to them by God, I reply: “God is not a real estate agent”…
Shuts ‘em up every time….

All of that has to be compulsorily supplemented by a strict and sensible immigration policy.

With which I agree provided by “strict and sensible” one means no more than a couple of thousand a year, which was the basis of America’s immigration policy with respect to Canada in the 1980′s when I was short-listed for a Chair at the University of Maine. Then, for me to obtain an visa, it would have been necessary for the University to convince Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, that there was no American qualified for the job, i.e., a condition that could obviously not be met.

As noted in my response to Rurik, I am sure that Britain will not be saved by any cultural or religious iniative, however sensible. Moreover, I don’t believe that culture, however admirable, and I do admire many aspects of it, is what maintains the coherence of the Jewish community and its determination to survive. Mostly, it seems to be paranoia driven by the Holocaust meme and constant anti-Semitism panics, many, perhaps most, on fake pretexts.

It is such cohesion among the common people that the Treason Party across the West so forcefully suppresses by every means of psychological warfare deployed by the media, Hollywood, the state-controlled education system. We are in a civil war, and those are the enemies that have to be destroyed.

Agree, mostly.

I think you’re overlooking something. England is the ancient land of the English people. Whereas Palestine/Israel is the ancient land of the Palestinian people.

That’s true. But America is the ancient land of the Amerindians. Canada is the ancient … etc.

Stealing other people’s land is what people have been doing since time immemorial. I agree it should not be condoned. But in Palestine, it’s game over — barring some unpredictable catastrophe for the Israelis. That’s why there can be no half measures in dealing with the immigrant influx to my homeland. If the Brits don’t kick the bastards out now, they’ll lose their country.

And I would say the chance of the Brits losing their country is far better than even, since they have an entrenched treason class in power. These are the people who, since the beginning of the industrial revolution despised the common people of England a country of:

Two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other’s habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets; who are formed by a different breeding, are fed by a different food, are ordered by different manners, and are not governed by the same laws: the rich and the poor.

Sam Sharma talks of the youth of England being “offered a better alternative, from Christian faith leaders”. LOL. From an established church run by Archbishop Justin Welby, a man with the classic Eton and Oxford Treason Party education? (It was at Eton in the 30′s that the debating society passed the motion “that the faces of the poor should be ground” with the amendment “that the faces of the poor should be underground.”) And if that were not enough, the Arch is of German Jewish extraction, not a heritage liable to make him wildly popular with the mass of Daily Mail reading Britishers, and a former oil company money man experienced in the Nigerian world of oil, money and politics, who must surely be an agent of the British intelligence services.

No, the only thing that might save the British people will be something with more than a passing resemblance to Nazism. Trump grasped that, which is why his campaign consisted in a huge number of mass rallies at which he addressed the crowd in short sentences with words of one syllable. It is also why Trump is the subject of all the hatred America’s Treason Party can muster.

Thus far, however, all populist leaders to emerge in Britain have been, pretty certainly, agents of the Treason Party, scripted to implode around election times: Nick Griffin of the British Nationalist Party, Nigel Farage of UKIP, and now Tommy Robinson, a high IQ psycho formerly known by the upper crust name of Yaxley-Lem0n.

they call any assertion of the rights of European peoples “white supremacism”

the only other people so universally maligned and demonized for simply wanting to persevere are the Palestinians – if they won’t agree to stop existing and just die off or go away and be replaced, it’s because they’re terrorists and full of hate!

if white folks refuse to hand over everything they’ve got, including their ancient lands and countries and cultures, down to their school girls – over to the forces of ‘diversity’, then it’s only because they’re inveterate racists and full of hate, and yep, want to rule supreme over themselves!!

how DARE they!

I don’t know of any white people in Virginia or anywhere else who’re demanding a return to neocolonialism and the right to rule over non-whites anywhere. (other than the Jewish supremacist zio-neocons)

what the people in Virginia are asking for is to rule over themselves, not others. They simply want a future.

but for white people (and only white people) to have the temerity to seek self-determination, in this age of zio-multiculturalism, is akin to bringing back black slavery and building gas chambers.

just like a Palestinian who protests the destruction of his ancient home and farm lands to make room for more Jewish supremacists, is ‘trying to push all the Jews into the sea!’

they move the goal posts so far off the field, that to simply want to exist = pure hate!

As for Britain’s Islamic no-go areas, what are the armed forces for?

not just Britain, but Sweden and other nations too. But the bigger question is why are all these Muslims in Britain in the first place?!

and we all know the answer, don’t we? Because Jews want them there. That Swedish politician who said Sweden is not for Swedes, but for the immigrants- would not get close to the levers of power were it not for back-room Jewish, Zionist, central bankster intrigues.

and if any Swede should object, you can only imagine the local headlines ….

“Swedish neo-Nazi white supremacist (full of hate!) wants to cut down on immigration!’

I support Sam’s population density justification for Israel’s “Jews only” immigration policy, the logic of which is even more applicable to England

I think you’re overlooking something. England is the ancient land of the English people. Whereas Palestine/Israel is the ancient land of the Palestinian people.

Unless you suffer under the hysterical idiocy that ‘God gave the land to the Jews’. In which case there are no arguments against what ‘God’ has ordained. And if that’s the case then all anyone needs to do is provide some obscure parchment with the words ‘God said your land belongs to me’. And thereby claim the right to slaughter the inhabitants and steal all their possessions and lands.

It sort of creates a rather subjective basis for the Rule of Law, if it can mean anything your God says it means. Yes? No?

I feel that people should be entitled to have a land and call it their own. Whether they’re white, black or anything in between. Especially if your people have been living on that land for centuries. And I suspect that much of the strife and misery in the world is created when people don’t respect and honor that simple imperative of people to be allowed to live unmolested in their own lands.

In the case of Israel, the PTB declared that the Jews of the world could have some of the Palestinian’s land. It was unfair, but it was supposed to be the long term answer to the intractable ‘Jewish question’. But rather than being the solution, it created massive problems that are festering today, and underlying the very causes for America’s (and the rest of the zio-west) serial wars in the Middle East. Because these people will NEVER be satisfied. They really do suffer under the staggering delusion that they’re better than everyone else. And that their religion gives them the moral/religious justification to lie, steal, cheat and murder anyone else in the pursuit of their agenda, which is total domination.

And in the pursuit of that total domination, we see all the problems we’re talking about in the Western world, with massive and transformational immigration. With laws that favor the immigrants over the indigenous white folks whose lands are being taken over.

All the uber-liberalism that pervades and permeates the west is all a direct consequence of these Jewish supremacists owning the media. Duh.

Of the power of the lobby to create or destroy any politicians it likes or doesn’t like.

so as you hear the media universally savage the people in Virginia as ‘white supremacists’, please keep in mind ((who)) owns that media.

who owns the GOP politicians who’re demanding Trump excoriate their voting base as vile, despicable and evil people! “White supremacists” who want to rule themselves!!!

the evil is beyond comprehension!

‘no more hate!’

Hello CanSpeccy

I was totally unaware of the aniconism proscription in Islam. I have said this before and reiterate here, why I fear Islam. It’s driven by two things: (a) their far superior fertility at least at this point in history and (2) Muslims possess today, far greater allure, a feeling of instant fraternity offered to youth in the U.K. and elsewhere in Europe; something clearly lacking in the myriads of Christian faith. Muslims in general are a dedicated, moral lot, often possessing qualities I admire [we ignore the criminals as one would for all faiths]; yet what makes that faith unacceptable to me are the two fundamental contradictions it carries against the core values of Western culture: freedom of association and a rejection of the voluntary transactions approach to economic life. There are many other incompatibilities, which I needn’t go into here. In reality, and if we are to seriously counter that threat, youth must be offered a better alternative, from Christian faith leaders [Jews do not proselytise, as I'm sure you know or I'd have offered my services ], Elders of each community and most of all, parents. Its not as tall a task as some might think. [The Jewish model of relaxing on the Sabbath around family without iPhones is a great start]. All of that has to be compulsorily supplemented by a strict and sensible immigration policy. Certainly in the U.K, which as you say has reached critical population density.

Shama loses all credibility

he’s just being a provocateur

he knows Google are agenda-driven SJW but he’s in bed with them

just like with Facebook or the NYT

so he tries to run cover for their odious culture of hate

This is where Shama loses all credibility (and his “thinking hat” bragging rights). Google is obviously employing racial/minority quotas in their hiring practices which makes it impossible to “hire anyone but the best”. It also goes against his own claim that the company is not hiring the best but simply trying to avoid anti-discrimination lawsuits.

No; this is where your anonymous courage fails on two counts: (1) It mangles my statement, which said: “No one in possession of their thinking hats would believe that a technology company would hire anyone but the best, least of all Google”. Its a case of a starting negative qualifying another towards the end of the sentence. So your reading comprehension needs improvement. (2) You are not very good at gleaning important information even when provided in plain sight. The relevant portion reads:

…while the ethnicity data is strictly for the company’s U.S. employees. Overall, 70% of Google employees are male, and 91% of U.S. employees are either white or Asian

Damore’s case arises in the U.S. so stick to facts. Second, you make the elementary error in assuming that I support Google’s decision or the fact their Human Resources Dept. has been taken over by SJWs. I do not; but if one is to make a case with fair standing in a court of law, careful knowledge of the data and circumstances is not optional.

It’s not the genes that are possessed. It’s the genes that are activated that matter. All it takes to turn an embryo from a female to a male is a single activated gene – that then goes on to trigger hundreds of others.

But now they’re militant and arrogant and demanding their rights to stomp into our homelands and demand government largess and even their own laws and customs, and if it were up to me….

… they’d be right out on their arses.

Fifty years ago, old-fashioned liberals used to say, “the only answer to intolerance in intolerance.” But now liberals are themselves so intolerant that they call any assertion of the rights of European peoples “white supremacism” (cf the Atlantic and Slate, here). It’s time, then, to end toleration of liberal intolerance and bigotry. Time, in fact, to tell liberals to GFYs. Meantime, if Western governments fail to pay attention to the rights of the European people, whose rights and prosperity are being destroyed by a mass of immigrant settlers, there is surely going to be big trouble.

As for Britain’s Islamic no-go areas, what are the armed forces for?

Certainly deploying aircraft carriers for which the Brits cannot afford the aircraft and which are vulnerable to any country able to afford a few Russian or Chinese anti-ship missiles is idiotic.The Brits should scuttle those ships now (they were originally ordered by Gordon Brown solely as a Scotch make-work project) and redeploy the manpower to a unit specifically trained to quell immigrant riots, eliminate no-go zones, and police the border.

I support Sam’s population density justification for Israel’s “Jews only” immigration policy, the logic of which is even more applicable to England whence Sam derives, since England has a higher population density than Israel (413 km squared, versus Israel’s 377).

In fact, England is greatly overpopulated and it is time to reverse the treasonous immigration policies of the the Blair, Brown, Cameron and May governments by offering big incentives for the non-indigenous to leave. A few billion pounds would provide the necessary inducement for millions of the more unproductive non-indigenous residents of Britain to return home. Non-monetary benefits, e.g., subsidized access for children of former long-term UK residents to British universities, could yield both a beneficial impetus to the outflow of unwanted foreign population plus a fund of goodwill for Britain abroad.

Such ideas run counter to the genocidal intent of mass immigration to the West, but the people have spoken. Seventy percent of Brits now want a hard Brexit because, as David Cameron acknowledged, the yes for Brexit was a vote against immigration.

Most of his work has been thoroughly discredited by his own colleagues and he is persona non-grata in polite company.

Polite company? Oh, you must be referring to the kind of company that excludes people like Dorothy Thompson, Joe Sobran, Helen Thomas, and Charles Lindbergh, right? Goy’s that don’t know their proper place.

Let’s dispense with the coquettish “template out there”, shall we? In your own words, please. That is what I mean by you being dodgy. You and your ilk ought to avail the anonymity offered by this forum and spill your guts.

Listen, all I can say is that the kind of policies I support are nowhere near as odious as the kind that you support, as a defender of the Zionist state.

I’ll upgrade your membership and yearly dues.

No, thanks. I don’t like to fund policies that have led to the death of over a million innocent people and the looting of the US treasury of over $6 trillion, taxpayer money that has been diverted from funding such important programs as health care and education.

[Also, can you please revert back to linked responses? It's damned odd this new habit, worse than the beastly weather]

You know what you have to do to make that nuisance go away.

No one in possession of their thinking hats would believe that a technology company would hire anyone but the best, least of all Google.

This is where Shama loses all credibility (and his “thinking hat” bragging rights). Google is obviously employing racial/minority quotas in their hiring practices which makes it impossible to “hire anyone but the best”. It also goes against his own claim that the company is not hiring the best but simply trying to avoid anti-discrimination lawsuits. He’s talking about this company, by the way:

Google pays €47m in tax in Ireland on €22bn sales revenue: http://archive.is/rGlMm

Are they really afraid of the US laws?

Second, his claim that:

Google employees are predominantly men (70%) and predominantly white (61%).

…is demolishing his own argument since Ireland is 95% white.

[Also, can you please revert back to linked responses? It's damned odd this new habit, worse than the beastly weather]

I notice that you didn’t ‘link’ to me, and I suspect it’s a glitch with the software

They do that lest they fall foul of anti-discrimination laws and open themselves to lawsuits.

so you don’t believe it’s ideological. Would you say the same of the NYT?

Google employees are predominantly men (70%) and predominantly white (61%).

yes and they’re screeching

that’s the whole point, (white) men are better at information tech than black women, but to notice this glaring and obvious fact makes you a vile racist!

and you’ll get fired for simply saying the emperor wears no clothes, because it isn’t PC, and Google is very PC, ideologically, not from fear of Jessie

No one in possession of their thinking hats would believe that a technology company would hire anyone but the best, least of all Google.

um Sam, looks like your beanie fell off. No doubt the entire human resources division is chock full of ‘womyn’s studies’ and ‘black studies’ and ‘gender studies’ graduates. Of whom no one pretends are net positives to the bottom line.

They mouth the diversity pablum to keep the agitprop crowd at bay.

yea right, that’s why they fired the guy, to keep those pesky right winger ‘agitprop’ guys away

Overwhelmingly that choice is driven by economics.

bollocks right back at cha

they segregate based on race, because blacks want to live among blacks, and browns want to live among browns, and yellows and whites and so on. Duh.

Which hate-filled minorities are you going on about?

the ones that attack your grandma because she’s white and try to knock her out. It’s even a game they play.

blacks and some browns mostly. An occasional Muslim might go berserk. An occasional black lesbian, like the one who burned a 12 year old white child to death with an acetylene torch.

are Jews unique in that Jews and *only* Jews should be allowed to have a country of their own?

is the nation of the Jewish people who hail from all corners of the Earth.

Ok, at least you’re honest about it.

Yes, and in fact, I know one. Do you know the population density of Israel? About 1000/mile^2. The US is 85/mile^2. The capacities of the two are not comparable.

so it all boils down to density? What’s the density of the Golan Heights? If it’s sparse, does that still give the Jews the right to steal the land?

The baby by Halachic law and the secular law is allowed to receive citizenship.

even if it has a black, unconverted Christian mother?

Really?

What do you tell Talha and his family? After all you chaps are the ones making all the noise in Virginia, aren’t you?

The people in Virginia have just as much right to march for their rights as anyone else does. And if you can’t see that, it’s only because you’re a Jewish supremacist racial bigot. Not to worry, there are plenty of you lot.

As for Talha, I’ve calculated it, and he’s exactly one in 13. 7834 million. That kind of cosmopolitan eloquence and humane scholarship is very rare indeed, and he’d definitely get my vote for citizenship.

As for most of the Muslims and Asians and Hispanics… when they were gracious guests, (and acted like it!) in this country, I feel they were mostly a net boon. Even a couple of the blacks.

But now they’re militant and arrogant and demanding their rights to stomp into our homelands and demand government largess and even their own laws and customs, and if it were up to me….

… they’d be right out on their arses. The second they so much as looked funny at any of our laws or customs or especially if they so much as touched one of our citizens. I wouldn’t just deport them. I’d make an example of them in one of our less hospitable prisons, where they could surely enjoy some diversity up close and personal, and then I’d deport them.

they could spread the news to their homies in the barrios and third world, that America is not so welcoming as it once was.

MAGA!

but I choose remembrance through a Constable vista of vivid meadows, of a people gentled by them.

And when the Muslim settlers have conquered by the womb not the sword, they’ll probably have the sheep, the cattle the horses and the people painted out of
every Constables vista, that’s if they don’t simply burn the canvases.

Depositing McDonald’s croakings, a worthy substance does not make. Most of his work has been thoroughly discredited by his own colleagues and he is persona non-grata in polite company. I won’t go into Avnery’s logic which you seek only as a first derivative, wrong in the particular and false in the general.

Which template do you speak of? Let’s dispense with the coquettish “template out there”, shall we? In your own words, please. That is what I mean by you being dodgy. You and your ilk ought to avail the anonymity offered by this forum and spill your guts. Reveal to me your understanding of this “template”, Once again, don’t be shy:

How do you deal with American Blacks, a great many of whom carry European genes. Do you have a proposal to separate the “Mainly European” ones from others? What do you do about our dear fellow commentator Talha, who is married to a Swedish lady?

Answer those questions thoughtfully, Georgie, then you might be able to summon a better understanding of genetic identity and its relative importance versus competitiveness and competency. Sammy and his other thoughts shall wait.

So you follow the Zionist State do you me hearties? Good. I’ll upgrade your membership and yearly dues.

[Also, can you please revert back to linked responses? It's damned odd this new habit, worse than the beastly weather]

because they sanctimoniously vomit buckets of “diversity” newspeak,

They do that lest they fall foul of anti-discrimination laws and open themselves to lawsuits.

which is a vile lie, because the only diversity they’re interested is the kind that discriminates against white men

Nonsense; that is observably untrue: Google employees are predominantly men (70%) and predominantly white (61%). No one in possession of their thinking hats would believe that a technology company would hire anyone but the best, least of all Google.

The gender data shared is global for all Google’s 50,000 employees, while the ethnicity data is strictly for the company’s U.S. employees. Overall, 70% of Google employees are male, and 91% of U.S. employees are either white or Asian. Google’s leadership is even less diverse: 79% of Google’s leadership is male, while 72% of its leadership is white.

http://mashable.com/2014/05/28/google-employee-demographics/#iR_yd_Jy78qs

They mouth the diversity pablum to keep the agitprop crowd at bay. Mostly, that is. Some of Google’s human resource related divisions have been captured by feminazis. Also, Sharpton and Jackson receive protection money. As I said before, both conditions are but costs of doing business. Major corps are all under enormous pressure on these counts.

and I’m not misrepresenting you. You were very clear that any (white) person who supports segregating for the purposes of raising his family away from hostile and dangerous minorities, was to your opinion; reprehensible (even if you didn’t use that precise word). I’m not quoting you because I have no interest in going back and looking at the comments, but I’m sure you’ll agree that you still believe that a white person who specifically does not want to raise his or her children among violent and aggressive and hate-filled minorities is somehow deplorable. Or no? If you’d care to repudiate that, and yes that ‘yes, I’d feel the same way if I lived in Detroit. I’d want to get my white children the **** out of there!’

Bollocks. Another example of your hysterics, and completely false. What I said was, in America today, Segregation is illegal. It is also unnecessary since people reveal their preferences by living where they choose to. Overwhelmingly that choice is driven by economics. I am sure you understand the meaning of free choice. If a white family finds raising children difficult in parts of Detroit, they’d move, as they most often do. Which hate-filled minorities are you going on about?

are Jews unique in that Jews and *only* Jews should be allowed to have a country of their own?

look at #130 above. http://www.unz.com/article/making-sense-of-the-google-memo/#comment-1968129

if a baby is born of a Jewish father and black Baptist mother here in the US, should that baby be allowed to make aliyah to Israel?

Yes, and in fact, I know one. Do you know the population density of Israel? About 1000/mile^2. The US is 85/mile^2. The capacities of the two are not comparable.

what if the baby has a Palestinian father and a Jewish mother? Does that matter? Even if the baby is not raised Jewish, but Muslim? And the mother has converted.

The baby by Halachic law and the secular law is allowed to receive citizenship. You may be unaware, but many such marriages do occur. If any were disallowed, it would’ve been for other reasons, mostly security related.

you tell me…

No. You tell me. I’ve answered almost all your questions. Your turn to answer a few. What do you tell Talha and his family? After all you chaps are the ones making all the noise in Virginia, aren’t you?

I am not you. That’s first.

I know you’re not me. That’s why said “if I were you,” and not “if you were me.” There’s that logic thing again that Avnery pointed out.

Second, do please add a second ‘t’, this being the second instance of ‘admitedly’ in recent communications. It pains me on occasion to witness a ‘cocky’ disregard for spell-checkers. Add a smile.

While I admitedly misspelled “admittedly,” I am always pleased to find you harping on my spelling mistakes instead of addressing the substance of my arguments. It’s a sure sign that you’ve got nothing to refute them. (Oh, just for the record, I’m sure if we have someone comb through all your previous comments they may across a few spelling mistakes of your own, no?) Add a smile.

So much for cockiness. It didn’t escape my attention that you, with customary dodginess, evaded all the weighty questions. I’ll repaste:

I thought I already addressed your “weighty” questions when I wrote: “There’s a template already out there that we can follow.”

As you well know many of these thorny issues are exactly what the Zionist state has been wrestling with. All that is required is to append a few more provisions to what they have already developed.

And speaking of “customary dodginess,” I seem to recall that iffen had put a number of questions to you regarding how the Iraq invasion was supposedly a benefit to the US and not Israel and that you had committed to providing him a response. You must still be working on it, I suppose?

Google is a technology company which, after reaching the pinnacle of success, arrives at a place where its platform is sought by various interests [including logically, the philosophies of its leaders] to serve in the furtherance of a select set of principles beyond its main commercial interests.

duh

that’s what we’ve all been talking about

So why should they allow any internal opposition to those principles from their own employees?

because they sanctimoniously vomit buckets of “diversity” newspeak, which is a vile lie, because the only diversity they’re interested is the kind that discriminates against white men and makes any kind of diversity of opinion about such an Orwellian philosophy verboten, which is hardly valuing diversity, but rather is more like a goose-stepping tyrannical and racist corporation. And to simply point out that obvious fact, will now get you fired.

They wouldn’t. Would you in your own business?

of course I would and have. I’ve hired a very diverse crowd of wonderful and eclectic people. Indians (trinis), Jewish women, Puerto Ricans and French Canadians, Cubans, Germans, Brits, Mexicans, and anyone else who has the skills and work ethic to make my business successful.

And everyone who knows me knows that I respect all points of view, even if they’re wrong. But I’d never demand fealty to any one point of view. That would be a complete heresy of everything I stand for. In case you haven’t noticed, I love the battle of ideas. Provided everyone is respectful of other’s right to their ideas, even when wrong Sam.

You and I may not like it [I don't], but their commercial policies are driven by stockholder interest and keeping pressure groups in a state of controllable
suspension

only the pressure groups they don’t like

they’re basically like the NYT, a seminal institution for the dissemination of information with access to that information being controlled and distorted to suit an agenda. And, in the case of Google, an uber-liberal / progressive, overtly anti-white agenda, (just like the NYT ; )

What on earth are you babbling about “forced integration?”. My conversations with Iffen were very clear regarding my views which you are clearly misrepresenting. I believe there is no need for Segregation. I believe in individual choice. Whites and Blacks are, for all practical purposes separated in this nation

not when the government can help it

and I’m not misrepresenting you. You were very clear that any (white) person who supports segregating for the purposes of raising his family away from hostile and dangerous minorities, was to your opinion; reprehensible (even if you didn’t use that precise word). I’m not quoting you because I have no interest in going back and looking at the comments, but I’m sure you’ll agree that you still believe that a white person who specifically does not want to raise his or her children among violent and aggressive and hate-filled minorities is somehow deplorable. Or no? If you’d care to repudiate that, and yes that ‘yes, I’d feel the same way if I lived in Detroit. I’d want to get my white children the **** out of there!’

Then I consider the matter closed, and you’ve seen the light

Tell me, what would you prefer to have in a nation already populated with so many diverse peoples? Separate colonies for North Europeans, South Europeans, East Europeans, Jews, Blacks, Chinese, Indians, Mexicans, Native Americans, Philipinos, Japanese, Koreans?

isn’t that the fundamental principle underlying Zionism?

if you’re willing to call that principle “stupid”, then why are we spending 38 billion dollars to support exactly such a principle?

are Jews unique in that Jews and *only* Jews should be allowed to have a country of their own?

eh Sam?

What about those families which are mixed in race?

you tell me…

if a baby is born of a Jewish father and black Baptist mother here in the US, should that baby be allowed to make aliyah to Israel?

what if the baby has a Palestinian father and a Jewish mother? Does that matter? Even if the baby is not raised Jewish, but Muslim? And the mother has converted.

where does Sam come down on these nuanced questions?

Europe did not lack for strife or visiting death on each other

that’s true, but in the last two conflagrations there was a hidden hand behind the death, wasn’t there? Have you ever heard of the Balfour Declaration Sam?

I think whites males in this nation are under stress due to the confluence of tectonic global shifts.

you could say the exact same thing about Palestinians, and remove all agency and blame from their existential mistreatment and eventual annihilation. ‘it just sort of happened, you know…’

There are many social imbalances and oddities, crony capitalistic laws, which afflict America today; signs of excess…

is that what’s mean by dissembling, Sam?

[I wouldn’t get too cocky if I were you, as this story is far from over. Although things admitedly look dismal today, there is plenty of time for several more plot turns. And if Prof. MacDonald is right, the future could be a turbulent one. So cockiness may not be the right attitude to have, just yet.]

I am not you. That’s first. Second, do please add a second ‘t’, this being the second instance of ‘admitedly’ in recent communications. It pains me on occasion to witness a ‘cocky’ disregard for spell-checkers. Add a smile.

So much for cockiness. It didn’t escape my attention that you, with customary dodginess, evaded all the weighty questions. I’ll repaste:

Other thorny matters arise. How do you deal with American Blacks, a great many of whom carry European genes. Do you have a proposal to separate the “Mainly European” ones from others? What do you do about our dear fellow commentator Talha, who is married to a Swedish lady?

Answer those questions thoughtfully, Georgie, then you might be able to summon a better understanding of genetic identity and its relative importance versus competitiveness and competency. Sammy and his other thoughts shall wait.

Cultures shape over centuries; sporadically changing, oft frozen, oft a changeling! Colourful, bleak, peaceable, violent, all of it in all those moments as the chrysalis struggles to form. One couldn’t just pick it as one would a pair of morning trousers, could one?

British culture is everything you say it is. It has its dark side, but I choose remembrance through a Constable vista of vivid meadows, of a people gentled by them. I do not wish for that to change.

Nor shall it, for I reckon the trends feared in that Guardian article you linked to, are based on an extrapolation into the future far too flatly. Which is not to say that vigilance and a firm hand to limit immigration to a tolerable level, incising the inmigration of an openly un-assimilative lot should not be undertaken. They surely must. As must go the LGBTQ humbug. These are matters un-complicated to agree upon.

As for Israel, I see it not a bit differently. Israel, re-founded with the blessing of the British Crown, is the nation of the Jewish people who hail from all corners of the Earth. She is also home to Arab Muslims and Christians, fully 25% of the population, a proportion significantly higher than in the U.K., and therefore perhaps sub-optimal. Still, they’ll have to make do.

On America, there’s a great deal to mull over. For now, I’ll only mention that in my contacts with the Kevin McD’s of this nation, I sense something missing, not in the department of cloddish sinisterness, of which they possess aplenty, but rather in a wilful neglect of the lessons of history. If these are the people in opposition to the core American values which undergird exceptionalism – individual liberty and voluntary transactions – their defeat is certain. To make a clearer case for American culture look to the traditional platform of Republicans to re-emerge in the fullness of time.

Or perhaps you have a certain “science” of the 1930s to guide you?

There’s a template already out there that we can follow.

Culture is key; more so than race.

Rich, coming from a self-professed Zionist.

Time has told; and aye, the spark that is likely to light the escaping methane.

I wouldn’t get too cocky if I were you, as this story is far from over. Although things admitedly look dismal today, there is plenty of time for several more plot turns. And if Prof. MacDonald is right, the future could be a turbulent one. So cockiness may not be the right attitude to have, just yet.

Culture is key; more so than race.

Not so. Culture is an artifact. We could have any culture we wanted (using the term “we” rather vaguely). But race, i.e., a gene pool, once destroyed, has gone for ever. The British have a unique gene pool that produced Shakespeare, Newton, Darwin, Sam Johnson, Adam Smith, David Hume and much, perhaps most, of the modern world including the state of Israel. I’m absolutely opposed to destroying that gene pool by a combination of repressed fertility (aka state-imposed sex “education”), and mass replacement immigration. Most Brits are too, according to the latest Brexit poll, which shows 70% for hard Brexit, meaning no free movement, aka mass replacement immigration. And if you disagree, I like to see you put the same argument to the Israelis.

Yeah, maybe you should tweet “#NotAllJews” every time Soros delivers a boatload of Muslims into Europe and “#NotAllMuslims” when one of them blows up in a crowd.

I think there is a resurgence of anti-white sentiment because at this point in time Israel has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Israel is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. The white race is going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Israel to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and the white race will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Israel will not survive.

[It sailed exactly 52 years ago, to be more precise.]

When in doubt or in need of help dial the Lobby.

[Regaining competitiveness and competency is secondary to regaining one’s identity, especially for Europeans, but, while admitedly a long-shot, even for the European-derived peoples of the US.]

Why especially for Europeans? [btw did you take an American citizenship when Trudeau wasn't looking?]

Genetic identity is a tricky and fascinating subject. It’ll tell you things you may not like. There are many weighty questions to consider. Have you mapped your genes? My genetic story takes me principally to Northern Europe, with certain markers for Jewish Levites, which I happen to be. Phenotypically I am confident you wouldn’t be able to pick me out from an Austrian crowd. Or perhaps you have a certain “science” of the 1930s to guide you?

Other thorny matters arise. How do you deal with American Blacks, a great many of whom carry European genes. Do you have a proposal to separate the “Mainly European” ones from others? What do you do about our dear fellow commentator Talha, who is married to a Swedish lady?

Answer those questions thoughtfully, Georgie, then you might be able to summon a better understanding of genetic identity and its relative importance versus competitiveness and competency. Sammy and his other thoughts shall wait.

Culture is key; more so than race. For example, I am more concerned with the rapidity with which culture appears to change in London today. I am keen on preserving a U.K. the way I remember it; a country of cheerful, doughty and polite peoples. But America I found it fully formed what it is this day; a culture which renders yourself pliant to opening your wallet.

Mika Perez? Is she on about love, Tikkun Olam or something? TL;DR

[Time will tell. His “croakings” just might be the spark that ignites this revolution you speak of, mate!]

Time has told; and aye, the spark that is likely to light the escaping methane.

Perhaps. And you? Too young and anonymously clued in?

You’re deliberately being very selective here. A lot of the Israeli media is against third world immigration into Europe. Read the Jerusalem Post and compare it with what is written in the the New York Times. You are conflating the views of people in Israel with the views of diaspora Jews in big cities in the US.

Different groups, different opinions.

How great nations die, or how the American media lie:

Here’s a sampling of the amazing lies about James Damore being told by the American media. No wonder so many Americans seem so stupid.

I struggle with the implications as well; but that ship sailed about 40 years ago…

It sailed exactly 52 years ago, to be more precise.

… and for these U.S. to regain competitiveness and competency, requires nothing short of revolution, starting with a revolution in education and attitudes.

Regaining competitiveness and competency is secondary to regaining one’s identity, especially for Europeans, but, while admitedly a long-shot, even for the European-derived peoples of the US.

Lessons need to be learned from Asia.

Lessons must indeed be drawn, but not from Asia. Our role model should be that to which Mika Almog, the grand-daughter of the late Shimon Peres, referred in a speech she gave at a J Street conference, early in 2017:

In 2012, President Obama awarded my grandfather the Presidential Medal of Freedom. “Shimon,” he said, “teaches us to never settle for the world as it is. We have a vision of the world as it ought to be… and we have to strive for it.”

What Presidents Perez and Obama suggest is a great daunting task. But if at moments fear should creep into your heart, to tell you it’s an impossible task, look no further than Israel. Zionism has always been against all odds. So if Israel is possible anything is possible.

http://mondoweiss.net/2017/03/israel-sometimes-walk/#sthash.WKP5w5hl.dpuf

Inspiring, isn’t it?

Kevin McDonald’s collected croakings simply won’t do, mate.

Time will tell. His “croakings” just might be the spark that ignites this revolution you speak of, mate!

I understand the predicament

I don’t think so. You sound too old and too out of touch, Shama.

Yes Specter is saying the European peoples must be destroyed in order to be saved.

The amazing thing is, the politically correct indoctrination of Europeans has brought many of them to the point that they believe such vicious propaganda.

Maybe Specter is such a moron that she believes it too. In any case, should it come to a trial, I should think a plea of imbecility would be her best defense. Her personal appearance would support the claim.

[I like the reference to “tectonic global shifts” as it suggests the probable causes of these massive demographic changes have little to do with peoples’ actions…they are merely the byproduct of natural forces, kinda’ like how an apple falls to the ground due to the force of gravity.]

Wel if you like it, I am rather pleased that one of us does; matter of fact I don’t so much. Some cursory digging of SIC codes for manufacturing will set straight how globalised production has gotten; Americans cannot blow their noses with a tissue without touching an intermediate or final product made offshore, let alone other more durable goods. I understand the predicament, I struggle with the implications as well; but that ship sailed about 40 years ago, and for these U.S. to regain competitiveness and competency, requires nothing short of revolution, starting with a revolution in education and attitudes. Depending on dreams of segregation [is there an app for it?] to do it, furthers the opposite. Lessons need to be learned from Asia. Kevin McDonald’s collected croakings simply won’t do, mate.

Her role in the European White Genocide project must be fully investigated first. Deportation might not be enough.

Not only is this (Swedish taxpayer funded) outsider completely skipping Sweden’s interests in her proclamations but she’s firmly telling Europe what it “must” do if it wants to “survive“.

Let’s not beat around the bush: who the fuck does she think she is and what, exactly, does this mean:

But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

Here’s James Damore’s WSJ article, which clarifies a few points raised above:

Appeared in the August 12, 2017, print edition of the Wall Street Journal as ‘Why I Was Fired By Google.’

Yes, if Swedish males had balls, they’d deport foreigners like Barbara Specter, and jail any of their own people who said the same thing.

Der Fuehrer being the one who instigated a big cull for purposes defined, ultimately, by the elite of his country.

der Fuehrer [thanks for the correction of my spelling] means simply leader or guide. Only Nazis mean Adolf Hitler when speaking of der Fuehrer.

But the term does imply ruthless leadership. And ruthless leadership is what is needed in the struggle for national survival.

I make no apology for implying that in such a struggle, survival trumps every other consideration. Committing national suicide for whatever supposedly noble principles is worse than pathetic, it is utterly contemptible.

Israel Officially Aids 3rd World Invasion

http://newobserveronline.com/israel-officially-aids-3rd-world-invasion/

The Jews are quite open about the reason for their hardline approach. As the New York Times says, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that the arrival of “refugees” posed a “demographic” risk to Israel: “If we don’t stop their entry, the problem that currently stands at 60,000 could grow to 600,000, and that threatens our existence as a Jewish and democratic state,” he said.

So it is clear that the Jews understand—correctly—that a mass Third World invasion will destroy their country, and they are very clear and open about this fact.

Nonetheless, at the very same time, they are actively funding and aiding a mass Third World invasion of Europe—knowing full well that this will destroy Europe.

Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for destruction of Christian European ethnic societies

“I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”

I think whites males in this nation are under stress due to the confluence of tectonic global shifts.

I like the reference to “tectonic global shifts” as it suggests the probable causes of these massive demographic changes have little to do with peoples’ actions…they are merely the byproduct of natural forces, kinda’ like how an apple falls to the ground due to the force of gravity.

Here are some hard facts that put the lie to this assertion:

Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review

Kevin MacDonald

California State University-Long Beach

This paper discusses Jewish involvement in shaping United States immigration policy. In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of co-religionists as a result of anti-Semitic movements, Jews have an interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies in which they resideas minorities. Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples. These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and funding anti-restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and originating intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological perspectives in the social sciences.

An excerpt from p. 300:

A congruent opinion is expressed by prominent Jewish social scientist and political activist Earl Raab’ who remarks very positively on the success of revised American immigration policy in altering the ethnic composition of the United States since 1965. Raab notes that the Jewish community has taken a leadership role in changing the Northwestern European bias of American immigration policy (1993a, p. 17), and he has also maintained that one factor inhibiting anti-Semitism in the contemporary United States is that “(a)n increasing ethnic heterogeneity, as a result of immigration, has made it even more difficult for a political party or mass movement of bigotry to develop” (1995, p. 91). Or more colorfully:

The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [i.e., Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever (Raab, 1993b, p. 23).

Indeed, the “primary objective” of Jewish political activity after 1945 “was … to prevent the emergence of an anti-Semitic reactionary mass movement in the United States” (Svonkin 1997,1998).

So, not to put too fine a point on it, what can be said is “mission accomplished” in terms of The Lobby’s efforts to ensure that fascism never again rears its ugly head in the world. What we’re witnessing now (e.g., Charlottsville, VA) are the last spasms of an organism that has been attacked by the “Diversity Is Our Strength” virus, implanted by The Lobby. But, as I keep reminding people, the tremendous success of The Lobby may be sowing the seeds of its own demise, as it will inevitably succumb to hubristic forces and keep reaching for more and more – e.g., the anti-BDS law that could fine Americans for up to $1M and imprison them for up to 20 yrs if they support BDS. These types of actions will convince more and more Americans that The Lobby is working against their interests and a day of reckoning will come.

To avert this scenario from unfolding, my consistent advice has been for the Jewish community to take notice of these risks and to work to curb the influence of their powerful lobbies. These lobbies must immediately cease and desist from pursuing their nefarious objectives – both domestic (diversity is our strength) and foreign (the phony GWOT that has drained gallons of blood and trillions of dollars to enhance the security of the villa in the jungle) – that are inimical to the interests of the American people.

Don’t believe me? Here’s what Prof. MacDonald predicts the future holds if things continue on the same path they’re currently on:

CONCLUSION

The defeats of 1924 and 1952 did not prevent the ultimate victory of the Jewish interest in combating the cultural, political, and demographic dominance of the European-derived peoples of the United States. What is truly remarkable is the tenacity with which Jewish ethnic interests were pursued for a period of close to 100 years. Also remarkable was the ability to frame the argument of immigration-restrictionists in terms of racial superiority in the period from 1924-1965 rather than in such positive terms as the ethnic interests of the peoples of northern and western Europe in main- taining a status quo as of 1924.

During the period between 1924 and 1965 Jewish interests were largely thwarted, but this did not prevent the ultimate triumph of the Jewish perspective on immigration.

Although the success of the anti-restrictionist effort is an indication that people can be induced to be altruistic toward other groups, I rather doubt such altruism will continue to occur if there are obvious signs that the status and political power of the European-derived group is decreasing while the power of other groups increases as a result of immigration and other social policies. The prediction, both on common sense grounds and on the basis of psychological research on social identity process (e.g., Hogg & Abrams, 1987), is that as other groups become increasingly powerful and salient in a multicultural society, the European-derived peoples of the United States will become increasingly unified and that contemporary divisive influences among the European-derived peoples of the United States (e.g., issues related to gender and sexual orientation; social class differences; religious differences) will be increasingly perceived as unimportant. Eventually these groups will develop greater cohesion and a sense of common interest in their interactions with the other ethnic groups with profound consequences on the future history of America and the West.

” Without a Fuhrer willing and able to beat the crap out of the Treason class, it’s game over for Western civilization and the peoples who created it.”

I hope someone shows up who beats the crap out of the Treason class.
But I very much doubt this person will be a Fuehrer type—Der Fuehrer being the one who instigated a big cull for purposes defined, ultimately, by the elite of his country.

But it doesn’t stop there. They demand that all of Europe and Scandinavia and every single last hamlet of the white race be blended out of existence for all eternity. Their hatred really is that all-consuming. Their genocidal imperative really is that psychotic, and I don’t think they’re ever going to relent. Ever. Until they’re pushed back.

No, they won’t relent on their own and it’s going to get much worse if we let them. The white race is set to be destroyed either directly or via miscegenation. The goal is the global, easily controllable, chicken farm with <90 IQ chickens. So let's take a look:

Even before the US, Canada, Europe and Australia turn fully yellow we can see a huge problem for the planners – namely: Russia and China. There's no way they'll allow those countries to attain a 10-15 IQ points advantage over the globalist chicken farm. Kinda' puts into perspective the MSM's insistence that those two countries represent the biggest threat to "peace, freedom and democracy", doesn't it? It also explains the massive, sustained build-up of First Strike (pre-emptive) nuclear capabilities in certain areas of the World. Something to think about.

you must recognize that you are at war, and to win at war you must have leadership, and military leadership is top down and totally authoritarian.

Well, a couple of points here actually.

First, personally coming from a military background, I believe we need a visionary genius, and, well, can’t really see that type in the modern military today.

Secondly, definitely disagree with “totally authoritarian” when it comes to military leadership.
You “feel” as an intellectual type and apparently a Brit so, I’d suggest taking a look at the book “Not mentioned in dispatches” by Spencer Fitz-Gibbon. He does repeat his angle a bit forcefully though, but it’s a very good reading.

Or to be more specific, when your group is under genocidal attack by among others, the mainstream media, the Vatican, the national government, the BBC, the school system, the university, and the Money Power, to name but a few, then unless you are willing to go docilely and figuratively into the gas chambers, you must recognize that you are at war, and to win at war you must have leadership, and military leadership is top down and totally authoritarian. To that end, my own people, the English, need a new Cromwell. What they’ll probably get a fraud run by MI5.