The very first law passed after the Constitution was ratified was to restrict immigration to white men of good character. Many founding fathers expressed the belief that they never thought of blacks nor Indians as Americans: that title was reserved for the white Christian (or Deist) settlers who built this country, predominantly English but with a smattering of Scots, Irish, French, Dutch, German, etc.

The declaration of Independence even complains about the British setting the savages against them. There was nothing preventing them from allowing Indians to vote, they were already present in many of the states. And yet, voting was done by white colonist men. Seen in this context, even the rhetorical flourish that all men are created equal clearly applies to the only people they saw as people: whites. In no sense can you possibly claim this nation was founded on equality of all races.

The Constitution has been dead since at least 1933, and especially since 1965. The fact that you’d revive the corpse that your fellow travelers have murdered to try to guilt others into line shows that you’re a special kind of sociopathic liar. Chutzpah doesn’t quite cover it.

Thanks for sharing. Not that I have faith in the government, but still good to see a Congressman speak out against tyranny.

United Nations, missionaries diplomats and the gazillions of NGO grifters and hustlers all trying to save African retards from themselves call it TIA

This is Africa Africa is what Africa is.

Laugh Out Loud.

Great post. Every president in my lifetime has been anti White from school desegregation affirmative action unlimited non White immigrants to Trump’s failure to do anything about both illegal and HI-B and student immigration.

Trump is just one of a long line of anti White presidents. It’s like Q Is the Pope Catholic?
A. Yes the Pope is Catholic
Q Are American Presidents anti White?
A. Yes American Presidents are anti White.

I just enjoy the insanity of the anti Trump liberals and Jews. November 16 was so much fun. I’m looking forward to November 20 and watching liberals and Jews heads explode in their rage and hatred of Whites.

And if Trump loses and the anti White party wins it won’t make any difference since every President the judiciary and both political parties are anti White and have been for about 70 years now.

White America is indeed experiencing a mass awakening. What are Trump and the GOP/Conservative, Inc. doing with this energy?

Funneling it into attacking Tlaib, Omar, and AOC for the sake of Israel and Jewish Supremacy.

Removing Trump and the GOP from power would theoretically help focus White America.

But, there is no political solution. Eight years of Kamala Harris and the Kosher Sandwich would once again funnel White America’s resentment back into the GOP like clockwork. America is fundamentally corrupted and dysfunctional as a whole. The best solutions are the most difficult solutions.

Secession and Separation.

Acquiring Greenland to add to this Failed Empire is MAGA Cartoonism.

Sometimes the best way to eliminate an obstacle is to blow right through it.

he needs to get back on this energy pic.twitter.com/F4IRJJSWHf

— 『ｄｅａｄ』＾１８ (@NlgAirForce) August 16, 2019

…the Conservative Party of the 1970s, and Thatcher herself, were heavily influenced by a cadre of Jewish intellectuals for whom any kind of racial-nationalist thinking would have been anathema.

Any kind of goyim racial-nationalist thinking.

https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/9-of-the-worst-monarchs-in-history/

“I recommend you read Africa Unchained: The Blueprint for Africa’s Future by Ghanaian academic George Ayittey of the Free Africa Foundation. His thesis is that thugocrats in power, are retarding economic development.”

I don’t think I need to. My comments have nothing to do with “white guilt”. The record is clear on that score.

I would fully agree that how the power structure plays out will determine the future. That the continent must untangle the mess of colonialism toward a new socialization process. And that is going to be very difficult. But they will have to sift through the shallowness of organization by color imposed fro more than several hundred years. And decide if they artifices of the boundaries actually work or not and configure them accordingly.

There was always going to be a retraction given that the gap between the colonial powers and the native population was an oceans wide. In such power vacuum it makes perfect sense that authoritarian figures fill the gap. That is not unique to Africa that some of those leaders are not adept and exercising authority to the better of the populous or even their own ends. That is an ahistorical dynamic the world over as is the process of how to stitch up whatever was left from the previous power. Its convenient for us to call out thuggery now that the primary thugs, white power is on the wane. Part of the western tactic of relieving ourselves of critique for the mess we left behind. I could point to the finger across the globe of the white leaders who were “thugs” and disasterous leaders.

Poor leadership (stifling economic growth and spread), if that is in fact the case is not unique to black africans.

Frankly, I imagine what most dread (and assume will never be) a United Africa with the wealth and power to back it up. And I won’t be shocked if that transition comes by way of a very strong central authority that stabilizes and then transitions to something wider.

The US was not born from democracy — few, if any nation states were.

Utter bullshit.

Andrew Joyce has made some interesting points in this article. I have a couple of things to add.

1 Milton Friedman, who was an influential figure on Mrs Thatcher, was responsible for the disastrous monetarist experiment from 1979 to 1983 (arguably it was abandonned in 1981). Friednman had a high profile as an advocate of the 1980s free-market agenda.There is a revealing youtube video of Friedsman speaking to a Jewish audience explaining how capitalism was good for the jews. Needless to say, the arguments are rather different than the message he put out to the public.

2 Mrs Thatcher’s visit to Israel was quite remarkable, in that she was guest of honour and gave a speech at the King David Hotel in 1986. This, of course, was the very same place that the Irgun had bombed, in an attack against the British in 1946. Of course there was no apology from any of the guests.

3 Mrs Thatcher’s links with Israel date back to her first visit in 1965, as a guest of Anglo-Israel Friendship League of Finchley.

https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106406

https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Thatcher-and-Israel-503040

She also stayed at the King David Hotel, this time less than 20 years after what was the worst terrorist action against British people until the Lockerbie incident, which she does not seem to mention.

Have some fun googling, especially the Israeli press, which is rather more frank than anything you will see in
the UK media on Mrs Thatcher’s relations with Israel.

Interesting book you’ve linked to.

I wonder how much the unfortunate ideology of British Israelism might have affected Thatcher’s thinking in that regard.

Essentially, Imperial British-Israelism had one goal above all others: the justification of the Empire. Unlike the splintered years which preceded and antedated it, the middle period presented a focus any loyal subject of the Crown could take to heart and proudly support.

http://www.revneal.org/Writings/Writings/british.htm

..the politics of all western nations are run by controllers who carefully play the two-party game in each country to fool the public into thinking that change in immigration is really going to happen.

Yes, Trump’s purpose has been to falsely get the historic Euro-American population’s hopes up that he might actually do something about the decades of deliberately uncontrolled mass immigration, only then to dash them, while simultaneously with certain knowing pronouncements acting as a ‘racist!’TM lightning rod to radicalize (ie Bolshevize) the Dem party. When 2020 rolls around the United States will be on the precipice of a Russian style ‘civil war’, where even now it resides.

Does Trump’s ego blind him to what he is doing and how he is being used, or is he performing this service freely and in full agreement? Is he expecting a massive payout? Being blackmailed possibly? A combination of all of that perhaps?

I put civil war in quotes as Sohlzenistyn correctly alludes in his writings that the so called Russian ‘Civil War’ was really a war against identity, ie the historic Russian people’s, as well as other people’s identities ultimately which had formally been part of the Russian Empire. It’ll be the same with the US and its historically predominant north-west Euro (ie ‘White’) population should there be a Red October like event here.

Neither ‘Capitalism’ nor closely paralleling ‘Communism’, the establishment’s so called ‘right’ and ‘left’ of the manufactured, contrived, and controlled Hegelian dialectic which has been at play since 1776 and 1789 respectively, ultimately accepts or tolerates identity in the form of distinctive physical and cultural peoplehood. Both anti-life systems war against this as does their synthesis, Multi-Culturalism.

As for wage slavery acquired by the so called ‘cheap labor’/mass immigration system, the economic and political basis of the multicultural society, there’s little question as things stand that the powers that be would willingly and freely give it up without there likely first being a major struggle of some type on their part.

It’s the source of the US/UK’s ‘progressive’ establishment’s wealth and power, both in it’s ‘right’ and ‘left’ manifestations. Besides that, if they were to give up the mass immigration system, which they certainly should, they’d have to do the difficult at times, but ultimately edifying work, of actually having to really and truly care about people, which in their inverted world is what they call ‘hate’.

‘..the immigrants usually serve three main functions: cheap labor to replace native groups, settlement in the ‘frontier’ (periphery), and control over the natives and their land. These dynamics generally result in the maintenance of hegemony..’

https://www.academia.edu/2116622/Between_urban_and_national_45_Political_mobilization_among_46_Mizrahim_in_Israel_s_development_4847_towns_

For more about MT and her destruction of Britain, see Sean Gabb.

He is an libertarian, but libertarian with no time for “Saint Margaret” BS.

https://www.seangabb.co.uk/the-legacy-of-margaret-thatcher-2013-sean-gabb-in-the-independent/

https://www.seangabb.co.uk/margaret-thatcher-the-miners-strike-and-the-triumph-of-middle-class-leftism-2015-by-sean-gabb/

https://www.seangabb.co.uk/category/margaret-thatcher/

Very good article, thank you.

https://www.aish.com/jw/s/Margaret-Thatcher-and-the-Jews.html

Both EliteCum and Obiwan are all over this article. Too much time on their hands?

“White” is not a nation, therefore no “white nationalism”, I don’t care which side you’re on. If you’re saying, Don’t hate on white unity, find the right term. If you’re saying, Whites cannot unite, you’re obviously a racist, so find a better term.

British politics, just like the politics of all western nations are run by controllers who carefully play the two-party game in each country to fool the public into thinking that change in immigration is really going to happen. Third parties like the BNP are either infiltrated and destroyed from within or their main platform is adopted by one of the two mainstream parties but is never implemented. Thatcher was put in power by these people who saw that the public wanted a “conservative” after years of Labour Party socialism but in the sphere of immigration, nothing was to change. A similar situation happened in Canada in the 1980’s when a group called the Reform Party was formed by Canadian nationalists to end the swamping of Canada with non-whites. Their immigration policy started out saying that the vast majority of the immigrants would be reflective of the settler founding peoples who created Canada (in other words European). All the while the media completely ignored the Reform Party. One day this weak-looking little man by the name of Preston Manning who was the son of previous Alberta Premier Ernest Manning joined the party and ran for the leadership. A lot of party members voted for him because they had liked the father. When a well-known, controversial newspaper columnist by the name of Doug Collins was nominated to be the Reform Party candidate in the rich Vancouver suburb of West Vancouver, Manning refused to sign the nomination papers after having previously said that he would never interfere with the local riding’s choices of nominees. Many nationalists left the party after that not liking the treacherous Manning. Under him, the party watered-down its immigration policy until it became the same as the government’s immigration policy. They were now the same as the Conservative party and decided to join together. Monied interests put Manning in and riding on the name of his father was a shoo-in to become the leader. He neutralized the party from within. After he became the leader, the national media became for friendly to the Reform Party and after a couple of years treated it as a “mainstream” party. A new nationalist party has been formed in Canada but in my opinion, is wasting its time as the same thing will happen. To me, Trump is controlled opposition, Nigel Farage is controlled opposition. No change can be accomplished within the bounds of the election system, the whole system is controlled as can be seen if one views the events in every western country in the past 70 years. Until the controllers themselves can be rendered inoperative, all we can do is dream.

Any form of white nationalism is already too late when the hispanic population reached 10% of the total. As they will out breed every racial group.

That’s why Margret Thatcher was protecting the “elite” judeo-masonic pedophiles in the 8O’s :

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Margret++Thatcher+obstructed+investigtion+of+pedophiles

[email protected] scum like Epstein

The Democratic Party

wants

TO MURDER IN COLD FUCKING BLOOD!!!

THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS MAJORITY

That’s for sure….

I recommend you read Africa Unchained: The Blueprint for Africa’s Future by Ghanaian academic George Ayittey of the Free Africa Foundation. His thesis is that thugocrats in power, are retarding economic development.

The ‘white guilt’ and chicken nugget reparations ATM card can’t fix this.

Nigeria’s inept leaders reportedly stole about $400 billion oil money between 1960 and 1999. They can’t even process the country’s crude but import refined products.

Elsewhere, Singapore, another British colony, has no natural resources but has amassed around $500 billion in sovereign wealth from industries like petrochemicals.

Thank you Andrew Joyce for this remarkable observation and review.

Germany’s cultural ‘enrichment’ began in 1945.

Yep, capitalist ‘right’ is Jewish, as is Libertarianism, Bolshevism, multiculturism, and so many other destructive ‘isms’. The Chosenites call so many of the shots, its difficult to know where their power starts and/or ends. Certainly Thatcher, the grocer’s daughter, would never have made it to No 10 without their blessing. She was appointed to undermine WN in Britian and promote multiculturalism, which has been so devisive to the UK. She also oversaw the process of de-industrialisation by shutting down or selling off major industries, so that Britian became a nation dependent on its (Jewish owned) banking and service sector (now outsourced to its former colonies).

De-industrialization was catastrophic and has even been linked to drug addiction among the working class as seen in the sordid movie Trainspotting. Today Scotland has the highest drug death rate in the European Union.

For (((Lawrence TRIBE)))…The existence of White Babies is a hate crime against JEWS and the majority nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc…

The Democratic Party is waging a GENOCIDAL RACE WAR against OUR PEOPLE!!!!

(((LAWRENCE TRIBE))) doesn’t even hide his hatred….

WW2 WASN’T WORTH IT….

Non-whites have no right to access White (of any nationality or ethnicity) people. That’s all there is to it. The constitution is a piece of paper as we can see it’s being used to justify infinity brown migration.

The fact that Trump is acting as a gate-keeper very much like Thatcher (or AfD, or Sweden Democrats) is more than obvious – ‘just sit tight goy and trust the plan, we are #winning’. Maybe it was necessary, it probably was, just to show that this was not the way.

Seems Jews are a major “obstacle” to White Nationalism.

Stacey Abrams…Governor of Georgia…

Would that be like having:IDI AMIN elected Governor of Georgia?

STACEY ABRAMS

IDI AMIN

It is too late for a White nationalist party to be elected today in the UK. In 1968 Powell after he was sacked by Heath probably could have formed his own party and gotten elected as PM, as he was very popular.

Today White Nationalists in the UK are routinely arrested for violation of hate speech laws and their parties banned

It is still possible for a real White nationalist party to be created in the US, but that window of opportunity is rapidly closing as draconian hate speech laws are being rapidly implemented.

Isn’t the sentiment that “gays are humans” born out of the Christian dogma that all men possess equally-worthy souls?

All souls are of priceless value. However, sexual deviancy doesn’t not give added value to the soul. It destroys worth. Dante wrote that Sodomy and Usury are on the same level in Hell.

Congolese Sheboon Joy Reid daughter of Congolese LEGAL IMMIGRANTS……

On a daily basis…on National TV taunts the HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS MAJORITY with grand proclamations of WHITE GENOCIDE………

This is what OUR PEOPLE died for on D-DAY…

WW2 wasn’t worth it…

The CIVIL WAR wasn’t worth it….

White Nationalism means self-determination for all white peoples.

While drowning, Greg Johnson is giving you an anchor when you need a life raft. He literally has pigeonholed all “white” people in exactly the same fashion as the psychotic talking heads on mainstream media. Any weaponized term identifies you as a pawn in the game. A white piece is forced to be moved on a chessboard because it is an integral component of the game. Don’t allow anyone to play you. Tommy Robinson (Lennon, or whatever his real name) is a Zionist shill collecting money from Israeli sources. Why is that? You think he is the only one? Don’t fall into being controlled opposition. Remove yourself from their game.

This doesn’t strictly apply to “Whites.” The “Blacks”, and all ethnic cultures for that matter, are being destroyed and played in exactly the same way. You think the Chinese weren’t played with Yalee Mao and the implementation of Communism?
https://web.archive.org/web/20140401235649/http://jewishfaces.com/china.html

http://digital.library.yale.edu/cdm/ref/collection/yale-ydn/id/135148

I’m going to have to correct you on that point:

Right before the 101 Airborne boarded those planes to parchute into Normandy on D-Day….General Ike Eisenhaurer can be seen talking and joking around with the men of 101 Airborne…you have probably seen the film footage many times….And now there is an audio recording of what General Eisenhauer said to these Young White Men:

General Eisenhauer:”Men, I want to remind you of the main reason why you are probably going to die today…You are on a great mission today….You are going to die fighting the Nazis so that Pakistani Muslim Legal Immigrants and their US Born Pakistan Muslim American Children…..And Congolese LEGAL IMMIGRANTS….and the US BORN Children of Congolese LEGAL IMMIGRANTS….can come to America by the millions every year…to vote White Americans….your White Children…your White Grandchildren……your White Great Grandchildren…..into a violently persecuted White Racial Minority within the borders of America!!!!…No go DIE for America today!!!”

This comment captures the stout spirit and ravenous motivation that built this place until its system was weakened by the parasites.

And you make the point by contrast that contemporary habits of spectating and consuming pail against the competitive performance of the past.

Too many have become like Jews who spectate and consume but never labor to venture out into the arena to compete and perform.

Of course, Jews, being the world’s most effective ass kissers and fair weather friends, they ingratiate themselves to the performers to gain a share of the performers’ rewards, while their fellow spectators who are goyim are left only in the consumer’s deficit position.

“You think protecting your skin color will make things right?”

It is the first and last step. Without the blood, all is lost. But as long as it is preserved, a sliver of hope remains.

“If being “Nationalist” means standing up for USA (Usury, Sodomy, Abortion)”

The USA, Russia and France are the original anti-White melting pots, chimaeras united not by blood but founded upon a mad idea. All must burn for a revival to take place.

“How are the ideas of “Whiteness” any different than “Multiculturalism?” They both promote the mixing of cultures.”

Why are cultures even important? Do not forget – they are a protection layer against intermixing first and foremost. But is that important nowadays when we know our true genetic groups, races and subraces? Are those distinctions worthwhile when our entire race is going under?

I’m not advocating for mixing Nordics with Sicilians, but for the establishment of eugenic policies across all European nations that put the highest value in the people of ultimately similar stock – the swarthy should be outbred by the fair in both Scotland and Czechia!

Currently, those “cultures” (if they can even be called such) are but dumb puppets in the hands of Jews, creating division between allies for the pettiest of reasons (such as language or religion). The resurgence of old-school nationalism in Central Europe is wasted when it is used to prop up NATO bases in Latvia out of the fear of Russian invasion – at the time when both Latvia and Russia are dying out, still have not repelled women’s rights, still suffer from uncontrolled migration!

“Look at what is happening in Poland is right now. That is why the NGO’s are going ballistic with pushing the Globohomo agenda.”

Isn’t the sentiment that “gays are humans” born out of the Christian dogma that all men possess equally-worthy souls? Weren’t Christians the ones who burned 98% of all Latin literature (as per Catherine Nixey) and destroyed the native European “pagan” temples first in Rome, then in Germanic and Slavic lands thus mutilating the European culture forever substituting it for Jewish myth? Doesn’t Galatians 3:28 form the basis of the very Globohomo agenda?

Thatcher, like Trump, was owned. The evidence is very strong that Trump had sexual relations with Jael. The evidence was also very strong that Thatcher had been sexually abused by her father

The similarities don’t end there. Just as Trump was best buddies with Epstein, so Thatcher was best buddies of Jimmy Saville.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2253929/Jimmy-Saviles-private-letters-Margaret-Thatcher-Files-edited-2-months-ago.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/revealed-jimmy-saviles-close-friendship-with-margaret-thatcher-8432351.html

Just to be fair, Ronald Reagan was also owned, his master was Roy Cohn.

There are two typos – missing spaces after [16] and [20].

The article is incredible. But it still is an important and disheartening fact that the issue of the White suicide is so unimportant to the Uglo-Sucksons that they can forget about it in a matter of years. And taking a woman for an answer to the issue is even more ridiculous than putting hope in a Judeo-Christian capitalist.

Some great articles on César’s blog.
https://chechar.wordpress.com/2018/11/22/homework-for-british-nationalists/

This country was founded by Europeans, for Europeans. If whites allow ourselves to become a minority population in our own country, we will lose our civilization, our heritage, and even our existence as a distinct people. True national unity can only be achieved through racial and ethnic homogeneity.

he was forced to apologize like a pathetic puppy getting its nose rubbed into a piss puddle on the living room carpet.
LOL. So true

“White Nationalism is often misunderstood or misrepresented as nationalism for generic white people as opposed to specific white ethnic groups. But there is no such thing as a generic white person. In this world, all white people belong to specific ethnic groups. Even colonial melting-pot societies like the United States do not create generic white people, but new ethnic identities: Americans, Canadians, etc. White Nationalism means self-determination for all white peoples, not merely generic whites, just as saving the rhino means saving all the specific subspecies of rhinos, not some sort of generic rhino.” – Greg Johnson, The White Nationalist Manifesto

Ah yes, the Hag, the Red Headed Stranger, and Trigger…LOL

Identity Politics is Race War is Divide and Conquer. Do the math.

I agree completely!

Identity Politics trivializes traditional ethnic cultures. White Nationalism is a ridiculous term. Let’s have a football match between the Green-Eyed Globalists and the Brown-Eyed Nationalists. How about the Blond Hairs versus the Black Hairs?

Congratulations, to all you programmed-minion-proxy warriors. You have accepted the terminology of your oppressors. The instant that you implement and accept using weaponized wording, you have lost. You have rejected your ethnic languages for legalese. You’ve rejected your traditional music and culture for Hollywood-produced propaganda. Who owns Hollwood? Your ignorance is magnified in your children. For the sake of fitting in, you have allowed them to be consumed by popular culture created by individuals like Bernays. What did you think was going to happen? You think protecting your skin color will make things right? You are in debt and live on land that you do not own. You are being managed by oligarchs that use your basic urges and sexual desires against you. If being “Nationalist” means standing up for USA (Usury, Sodomy, Abortion) and accepting the dictates of a tyrannical source to send me or my kids off to die in Iran for the desires of Adelson and Singer, then I reject it completely.

How are the ideas of “Whiteness” any different than “Multiculturalism?” They both promote the mixing of cultures. European cultures have lost their native tongues and their unique cultures due to their own laziness. How many Irish know how to dance an Irish Jig? However, lets forget those things that actually make our identity and focus on forming a union based primarily on white skin. Andrew Joyce groups Europeans together ignoring completely that Hungarians, for example, are completely different in language and culture to the Scottish. Joyce`s philosophy is nuanced but not much different than the psychotic Globalists wanting to group the Somali with the Brit. They are all non-compatible options. Ethnic cohesion is exactly what they do not want.

Kalergi’s plan of creating a mongrel Europe controlled by a Jewish-based oligarchy at the head is a fact and is definitely being executed. It started with the EU promoting and pushing the homogeneous European “White” citizen after WWII. European cultures became so diluted, with garbage like ‘Eurovision’ that they became easily malleable for a greater cultural experiment.

The only way to break the spell is for the younger generations in each European country to snap out of it and to take a stand. It won’t be easy and virtually impossible. Look at what is happening in Poland is right now. That is why the NGO’s are going ballistic with pushing the Globohomo agenda. They want to be in control of the group that determines critical mass.

Excellent points. This has always been about saying, “let the rapist cup your mouth in the forest, as you scream…any attempt to remove his hand from your mouth, is preventing his rape of you”…as if that logic makes any sense. That’s what whites are being told to do. And the “good whites” who think virtue signaling is going to save them, seem to continually misunderstand that blacks (and browns) are already in a race war with whites, for the nations resources–and not just “the land” or “access”–but for the very tax dollars whites work for–and they have zero qualms making that clear, over and over.

Yet the “good whites” (Anglo, virtue signaling descendants of Puritans) keep thinking that somehow “we are all in this together” (e.g. “diversity is our strength”), despite all the factual and documented evidence, daily, to the contrary. Blacks (especially) are in no ‘social contract’ with whites, it’s completely one-way, with the rules increasingly changing and narrowing in on whites (see the recent war on Becky, something unheard of during the politically-correct 90’s). From daily crimes committed against whites (especially white women), to affirmative action (against whites’ own children), to set-asides, welfare, an inability to walk down a street in most metropolitan / urban areas, to censorship against whites anywhere, anytime, for any wrongThink–nothing is trending toward “all in this together”.

People say the breaking point is near. I don’t see it, not within the white culture–it will take a lot more, and by that, I mean an active “shoot them as they walk down the street, everywhere” type situation…and if that is near, it will be from the other side–and even then whites will hesitate to defend themselves.

There are political issues which transcend racial and ethnic identity which roil the voters:

1.) Immigration restriction;
2.) Political correctness.

Hostility to immigration and political correctness find a significant constituency across all ethnic and racial divides (although that does not mean there is a coordinated constituency). These hostilities are also contrary to the programs of the Center Left and Far Left, which creates a substantial possible constituency for the Center Right or the Far Right, should they get up off their knee pads, turn their backs on the corporate lobbyists, and build a popular mass political coalition.

On the other hand “white nationalism”, repatriations of legal citizens, suspensions of civil liberties and due process, jackboots, anti-semitism/counter-semitism, and the rest of that whole package have a much narrower constituency than the above two issues. Voters will support Far Right parties founded by libertarians with much more gusto than Far Right parties with neo-fascist roots. Also, not only do the issues of “Storm Front” white nationalism alienate most normal people who desire an end to mass immigration and political correctness, it is self-limiting by excluding minority demographics who desire restrictionism.

In terms of democratic politics, to get anywhere in polls politicians will have to reject white nationalism or white exclusionary politics or they will remain fringe candidates. I suppose white exclusionary politics could capture things through a putsch or something similar, but in reality there are a whole set of institutional, legal and political defenses in place to prevent such an event. Sure, if the economy goes into a depression, there is a nuclear war and a hot ethnic civil war, white nationalism might capture the state, but its a true long shot. Look at how bad things got in Germany before Hitler got anywhere close to the ring. America hasn’t just lost a world war, we don’t have a new and unstable parliamentary government, we aren’t paying war reparations, there is no depression, and we don’t have large-scale support for revolutionary communists threatening socialist revolution–nor do we have a cadre of angry elites who got ousted following the collapse of the Kaiser.

While there are ideological voters, most voters are not ideological, and to establish a viable electoral coalition, there has to be more substance that just a couple political issues or froth about “white genocide”. This means compromise, and also disaffected ideologues upset that things aren’t pure enough forming fringe parties. Yes, the right will probably co-opt all popular positions on the far right, and no, the unpopular positions on the far right will probably remain in the cellar. Is that good or bad for the cellar dwellers?

In order to retain the lilly-white, Christian ethos of the West, you must declare Jews and Muslims enemies no. one and two then move on to developing a platform of repatriation of all Hindus, Chinese, Africans, Latinos etc back to their native lands. Now that’s a tall order given that you do not control the money supply, however you do retain the numerical strength in the collective armed forces of the traditional white countries, so get cracking or it shall be all over within the next three decades at the most. What say you, sirrah?

Why cultural Marxists hate a conservative America.

“Clay Higgins schools a lying Google corporate suit.”

The jew owns the figurehead trumpstein, the federal government, visual and print media, and finance…….meeting no resistance at all from any segment of american society. To the contrary, a large fraction of the white population, the chrissies, actually worship the jew and wallow in their own weakness and subjugation. So the gloating vismins posting here, taunting whitey mercilessly, are just pointing out the reality of american society: the usa is now a multi-racial cesspool with zero chance of any reversal. The last american to take on the jew directly was henry ford 100 years ago…..who did his best to prevent WWI and the beyond stupid slaughter of whites by other whites. To maintain car sales, he was forced to apologize like a pathetic puppy getting its nose rubbed into a piss puddle on the living room carpet.

It’s kosher bait and switch.

Pro-Rothschild/Globalist Tweedle-Dem versus pro-Zionist/Likudist Tweedle GOP equals the tribe’s hegemony.

A true nationalist movement needs a real identity rooted in a common origin, culture, spirituality, tradition, history and soil. The true and American identity was forged on the frontier in the west and it transcended the parochial and limited (English and Protestant/Masonic) interests of the Founders.

Divine Providence cleared the way for western expansionism and the establishment of a great tellurocratic nation of overwhelming Christian European provenance and serving as a home to those of the great mother continent seeking to build a home to escape the dynastic quarrels, economic squalor and overcrowding of Europe.

That was America’s true providential role, and while it was strong and vigorous, America had the power of assimilation and the chronic vigor which Cardinal Newman (in an altogether different context) described as essential elements of truly organic and healthy development of any nation or institutions.

Unfortunately, lust for empire, easy profit in the east, and the intrusion of the tribe with respect to cultural and social matters replaced the vigorous nationalist expansionism and great continental power and turned it into a predatory, sea borne empire whose meddling and interventionism would ultimately have catastrophic consequences both for itself and the mother continent.

The USA of today is little more than a cowhide shaped landmass held together by the Hollywood (Jewish) illusory “American dream”, consumerism, sports spectacles and negroid entertainment. Americans- rather, “USAn’s”-have forsaken the providential role of America as a homeland for free Christian Europeans for the shining “shopping mall on top of the hill.”

The Liberals used to argue that nonwhite Legal Immigration was a great benefit to the NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS….since 2008….That nasty bit of propaganda has been replaced with taunts along the lines of DIE WHITEY…DIE WHITEY….These MURDEROUS GENOCIDAL TAUNTS come from Hindu “Americans” such as street shitter Sairo Rao…and Muslim “American” Immigration Lawyer Ahkmad Hassan who is on a rampage to take-down the Civic Nationalist Fags NUMBERSUSA…and FAIR….and CIS…..I wish Hassan well in those efforts to destroy these CUCKED FAGGOT Civic Nationalists who spent decades telling young White Women not to have lots of White Babies……ZPG And NPG=The mass murder of NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS at the hands of Akhmad Hassan’s People……

I disagree somewhat, only because the temperments of Thatcher and Trump are so different. And Trump, who has no impulse control (he must weigh in and Tweet on everything), has not helped the WN cause much thus far. But, from my faraway armchair perspective, it seems to be getting better organized out of necessity. As Trump, by the very air he breathes, has so enraged Washington, Big Media, and the Left in general, he may, especially if he wins a second term, actually bring about a Civil War, even though he clearly doesn’t want one. It won’t be WN’s who will start it (though they’ll be blamed) but our enemies on the increasingly violent Left – who already have. Their rhetoric is getting seriously out of hand, as they want to away our guns, via ‘red flag’ laws, based on nothing more than a neighbor’s suspicion. And it’s not even an election year yet. Wait until next year!

If Trump was Thatcher or Reagan, with their more calming, professional demeanor, the Left would not have lost its collective mind and be so ready to start killing whites. Actually, and it may be counterintuitive, but a second term Trump may bring about that which he opposes even more so than a Warren/Sanders/Harris/Biden ‘White Man Evil’ presidency.

In other words, THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS MAJORITY should not notice that they are being voted into a White Racial Minority within the borders of America by Hindus and Jamaicans……KAMALA HARRIS’S PEOPLE seriously FUCK OFF you GD CUCK…

In other words, THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS MAJORITY should not notice that they are being voted into a White Racial Minority within the borders of America by Hindus and Jamaicans……KAMALA HARRIS’S PEOPLE seriously FUCK OFF you GD CUCK…

Agree, the book Trance Formation of America by Cathy O’Brien tells it all about Reagan and another book is Thanks for the Memories by Brice Taylor and see their videos on youtube, tells the unvarnished truth about Reagan.

Trump is a charlatan who is doing the bidding of his zionist masters who control every facet of the zio/US and have since 1913 when the zionists fastened their privately owned FED and IRS on an unsuspecting public.

Trump is a deceiver just like his zionist overlords and when Trump and his zionist White House gets through with America there will be a civil war, and by the way Trump and Helliary are twins, same zionist overlords and same agenda.

The most salient part of this article is the notion that English conservatism (personified in Thatcher) is vary bad for all non-Elite whites.

I concur.

If you fall for WASP conservatism, for its various jingoisms, which always are predicated strongly upon hating many non-WASP whites, then you tie the noose that they place around your neck and tighten as they see fit.

Yeah, I love it when the Re-publicans worship Ronnie Reagan, the man that not only brought the crack plague to LA through Iran Contra, but also foisted the Soviet style educational system upon America.

Keep givin’, cause the whole time you’re gettin’ it right up the ol’ shite chute.

Truth is very seldom soft and cuddly. It is more often harsh,divisive, and brutal. If you want to live in a fantasy world, I suggest Disney Land.

Some countries don’t have these problems. For example the Japanese are comfortable with being ethnic Japanese in Japan, same as Chinese in China and Jews in Israel.

The reason it works is that they don’t shy away from a conversation on race/ethnicity. They view their success as based on ethnic unity.

Anglos could do the same (although they won’t). It would reinstate the primacy of race/territory. The “blood and soil” argument could take a milder or harder form, with both not making much difference to the lives of ethnic minorities in the UK or US.

MILD VERSION: Everyone in the US who has/had parents/grandparents who were US citizens in 1950 receives a new US citizenship card with 1) full political rights and obligations 2) the right to hold political office and be employed in the US administration. People who don’t qualify receive a US residency card with the same rights as US citizens (other than political) if they pay taxes.

HARD VERSION: Same as above, but everyone in the US who has/had parents/grandparents who were US citizens in 1950, and more than 50%s ethnically Anglo (or Anglo European).

Either version would produce a massive Jewish, MSM, SWJ, multi-cult outcry, but it would define the political “ownership” or Anglo countries and wouldn’t affect the day to day lives of foreign residents. In fact, in the longer term it would improve their lives since it would stop the Brazilianization of the UK/US and produce a more stable and less conflictive society.

Unfortunately, it’s so late in the day that only a dictatorship could realistically introduce it, and halt the present UK/US multicultural struggle for power.

Race war is already here. Demonising White males is in fashion. Wokeness is rampant. Whites have yet to fight back- and thats exactly what you fear. Identity politics is engaged in by every group except Whites. Whites trying to be neutral while everyone else is tribal is a losing game.

The only people I see trying to defuse White ethnocentrism are Jewish mischlings who seem to realise that they are both ideally placed to subvert whatever growing White tribalist movement is coming and who know that not being official Jews with a powerful communiry to run to realise they will be first in the firing line.

Race wars are not different than pimple wars.. all people without pimples are targets of those people with pimples. <==Do not forget the law of vote cancellation ..
if 9 people are on an island, and they elect one to be their leader..
the one leader will find an issue that will divide the remaining 8 into two groups of 4..
each group of 4 will vote in accordance with the group's philosophy on the issue
so that the 9th person controls the outcome of all elections.

Group for the issue __________= 4 votes for the issue
Group against the issue_______= 4 votes against the issue
Net vote before leader votes___= 0 <=its a tie
Leaders' vote (9th vote)______ = 1 which ever way the leader wants..

I don’t think one has to look that hard for ‘obstacles to White Nationalism’.

Ronald Reagan ( 1911-2004 ) , Margaret Thatcher ( 1925-2013 ) and Karol Wojtila ( John Paul II ) ( 1920-2005 ) .

Great terminators of history . They not only ruined the Eastern Empire , but the two millenia old Catholic Church and the Western Empire as well .

your first paragraph hits the nail squarely on the head

Thatcher did the colonial Falklans Islands war ( Malvinas for the argentinians ) which was a pyrrhic victory for the english . Without the US logistic help the war would have been a clear defeat for the british . The British Navy suffered so many losses that never recuperated since then .

Thatcher threatened to throw an atomic bomb to civilians , to a ” big city ” in Argentina .

The british lost 31 ships , sunk or damaged , 154 planes and helicopters and 1100 men .

http://www.institutodeestrategia.com/articulo/americas/cuales-fueron-las-bajas-de/20180218110112010727.html

And in what way, pray, are whites permitted to defend themselves against invasion and take-over by non-whites without incurring your charge of ‘inciting race war’? It seems that you are suggesting that whites under threat of marginalisation ought merely to remain silent, or else risk being ‘divided and ruled’. Your lame analysis is nothing more than a prescription for white extinction being accomplished without so much as a murmur of resistance.

Death to White Supremacists.
Jared Taylor has been banned from Europe. That is great. White people deserve to go extinct. Our planet’s future depends on it
A black person from Angola can go and visit his White Baby Mama in Germany but this so called “Huwhite Nationalist” can not even enter Europe. LOL.

>a man who let his daughter be impregnated by a Jew is not a White Nationalist

Who’d a thunk?

I can’t believe that anyone thinks there is any obstacle to White Nationalism other than the White Trashionalists themselves.

As Heartiste often used to say, “99% White Trashionalism is nothing more than the bottom decile of white men getting angry that the bottom decile of white women are no longer being forced to be with them.”

Actually, he was way too generous. About 40% of White Trashionalists are bisexual.

It is the greatest concentration of Dunning-Kruger ever. Well, the only comparable concentration is the female contingent of this defective subrace – the fat bluehaired feminists.

“No she did not. The retraction of the British Empire is much more complex than that.”

Excuse me, but you might want to take a peek at British colonial history. The colonies inhabitants were British citizens. And those promises made then have been a continuous problem, as some of the same have attempted to cash in on that citizenship. Apparently unaware that the phrase “one of the reasons” is an indication that there were other reasons — so my comments indicate that along with her treatment of her colonial subjects, there were other variables that contributed the decline of the British Empire, my reference being one of them – not the sole cause.

I would not confuse the promise with the reality, but clearly, the “Europeanization” of blacks in her colonies was part of those promises attempted fulfillment.

https://www.theglobalist.com/nigerias-current-troubles-and-its-british-colonial-roots/

—————-

“Again, nonsense.”

You are encouraged to research the first shots of WWI which took place in Africa and fired by an African in the British Army.

http://www.passportia.org/uk/british-nationality/descent/

https://www.bl.uk/world-war-one/articles/colonial-troops

— a deeper look will reveal that some of the very first casualties were British colonial subjects WWI
— and in WWII despite the concerns black africans took part in the war effort in support Great Britain.

Not a huge fan of wikipdia however,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Colonial_Auxiliary_Forces

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King%27s_African_Rifles

Dr / Mr Joyce:

While Thatcher was fighting on the economic front, she did nothing to forestall the nascent Gramscian cultural revolution. She was apparently unaware of what was already undermining and ultimately subverting the basis of British society!

Instead of an Enoch Powell, Britain got Thatcher, another shortsighted pol.

Agreed. While Trump is at best an egomaniac who is easily misled by Zionists, and at worst a controlled-opposition tool who never had any interest in MAGA, it would be ideal if White Advocates are seen as the most devoted friends to Trump-supporting normies so that we can take the lead in the opposition to whatever leftist is likely to win in 2020.

Although this article is much better than ordinary Joyce’s unenviable “musings” on JQ, it still falls short in some respects.

I’ve read Thatcher’s main work “Statecraft” (strange, Joyce never refers to her central ideological book) & what is, for attentive reader evident is: Thatcher was a modern British nationalist with political-economic ideology close to classical liberalism (in her case, Hayek et al.), white not, I would say, quite understanding blood & soil nationalism (which in Anglosphere goes under race realism or more extreme forms as white nationalism).

As for Jews & Israel, Thatcher was a realist, not a dupe for some imaginary Zionists. Her take was: the state of Israel is here because of Balfour declaration & what happened after. It has nothing to do with “who was there first” or similar abstractions.

She was acutely aware of national question of European peoples, more than most American presidents. She, I think it is obvious, did not fully comprehend power of racial identity in multi-racial societies. So, bluntly, was she, re racial national question:

a) completely unaware
b) partially unaware
c) aware, but cynical opportunist
d) aware, but a bit wishy-washy & not willing to open another front, this time potentially much more dangerous than bickering with France & Germany
e) blinded by her liberal economic philosophy & thus couldn’t see the magnitude of racial component in a national question
f) traitor

My opinion is d), plus something of e).

IMO Thatcher reduced immigration as much as she realistically could without being painted (more) of a monster. If she’d had tried anything more draconian, the media and chattering classes would have ensured she was finished.

Remember, the 1980s were a time of marked increases of non-white immigration in much of the rest of the west. The US, Canada, NZ and Australia most notably, but also France, Germany and other European nations. At the same time, non white immigration to the UK had been reduced from a high of 136,400 in 1962, to 60-70,000 between 1972-1976, to a low of barely 20,000 by 1987. Not once between 1982 and 1990 did non-white immigration to the UK exceed 30,000. Over the last 20 years, thats been more typically around 250-300,000. While births to immigrant mothers rose from 11.3% in 1971 to 13.1% by 1979, under Thatcher they fell from 13.1% in 1981 to 11.6% by 1990 (under major, they rose from 11.6% to 13.1%, under blair from 13.1% to 23.2%, and under the Tories have risen to 28.4%, higher than any major western nation bar Canada – 31.5%)

When she left office, the UK was still a largely white country…the 1991 census essentially coming up with a figure of 95% white (slightly less…93.8% in England alone), down from perhaps 96.5% white in 1981, the vast majority of the change due to births over deaths, not immigration.

Lets consider what she did.
Withdrawal of the automatic right of foreign husbands/fiances to enter the UK
The 1981 Nationality Act – Ended any possibility of Birthright citizenship
The Primary Purpose Rule – Clamped down on sham marriages. Also had to prove that elderly dependants had no one who could support them in their origin country.
Prevented Students from using that type of Visa for a means to settle.
Prevented further East African Asians from entering Britain by replacing commonwealth citizenship with British overseas Citizenship, which granted no right of entry or settlement unless parent/grandparent had been born in Britain.
1988 immigration act prevented chain migration for those settled prior to 1973 & made deportation of illegals easier.

Good article, yes Thatcher was a globalist masquerading as a nationalist and stole the support of the National Front, who were also being undermined by the organs of the state.

You put a very good case that Trump is the same.

She told those native populations during colonial rule that they were in fact British citizens — and her failure to act accordingly is one reason why her colonial empire retracted.

No she did not. The retraction of the British Empire is much more complex than that.

Millions of those natives fought bravely alongside whites in defending British interests and yet very little of the benefits of their local riches were bestowed on them.

Again, nonsense.

Interesting about Thatcher. In Australia, circa ’96 > Pauline Hanson’s One Nation was a version of the UK’s NF. Less militant, more conservative (it’s base was country Queensland & NSW — National & Liberal party territory. One Nation was ultimately a cynical & incompetent mess. However, many “conservatives” did respond to its immigration fears. Like Thatcher, John Howard, leader of the coalition (Aust’s version of the UK’s Tories) were fearful of vote leakage. Like Thatcher they co-oped One Nation’s basic ideas without actually doing much (they successfully turned the whole debate from 100,000’s of legal immigration to the few thousand of illegals).
But Howard went one step further; a notorious tabloid journo, a future Liberal/coalition PM & one or two others decided over cappuccinos under a lovely Sydney sun to fit Hanson up with electoral fraud. Nice one. She went to jail. On Appeal the whole thing was revealed as the nasty trumped up bucket of crap it was & she was released immediately. All very edifying — NOT.

Some corrections:

You make comments about family as though family is equivelent to constitutional dynamics. A notion that is utterly bankrupt of truth.

Yet in the US whites who hold and have held all the vestiges of power according to no small number of has led to permanent decay

And while the founders knew they preferred whiteness, they also knew that a country founded on law of equality based on anything else would be unsustainable

You utter moron.

“What line of thought / intent is that?”

That morality simply is an inconvenience.

——————————

The answer to every question is that citizenship in the US and its accompanying rights is determined by the Constitution and that you would ask any pf the above inquiries indicates that you neither comprehend nor are you willing to abide by the laws of the land.

Which defines the nature of the tribe to whit all citizens belong. And that trumps class, culture, language and that even trumps and supercedes skin color as some manner of mandate for inclusion.

Your comments and inquiry reflect a the kind of relativistic thinking that liberals seek to embrace and invoke to their agendas — that their feelings are the rules as opposed to truth.

Now let’s apply the record of history — whites have been at each other;s throats despite being Europeans. That is the case for one simple reason, their cultures are not based primarily on or at all really on whiteness. if so then this beknighted existence you want to put forward as superior would have fostered unity — instead some the world’s most damaging conflicts have come at the hands of whites.

Its a very simple equation if whiteness by definition is to superiority — then one expects superior consequence. Yet in the US whites who hold and have held all the vestiges of power according to no small number of permanent decay in Europe and the US. Even something as staple of white leadership as war making: has been tragic for the US and that as recent as the last ten years.

Now in the past I have tolerated your knee jerk reactionary misuse of my comments by yanking them out of context and then responding to some aspect to which they do not apply.

For example and this is just one of many.

You make comments about family as though family is equivelent to family dynamics. A notion that is utterly bankrupt of truth. Once someone becomes a citizen they are entitled by law and order to the rights and responsibilities of of citizenship and your advance that family trumps that legal right is what condemns your entire assail. And worse, it is an indication that you intend to deny citizens their rights because of your personal feelings about family. That is not only illegal it’s immoral. And the history makes clear that whites

who have railed about law and order have used law and order to justify discrimination — you disqualify yourself from the discussion by your making up what I said and what it means. You cannot by law deny blacks because they are not of your “racial” liking. The fact that the country has makes the point for redress. The fact that you persist makes you wholly ignorant of the how the country is designed and why.

And while the founders knew they preferred whiteness, they also knew that a country founded on law of equality would be unsustainable because it was already a country of people with variances, including skin color as part of the fabric.

The fight you want to have is against the US. And that makes anything you have to say suspect, further

traitorous.

Yep, capitalist ‘right’ is Jewish, as is Libertarianism, Bolshevism, multiculturism, and so many other destructive ‘isms’. The Chosenites call so many of the shots, its difficult to know where their power starts and/or ends. Certainly Thatcher, the grocer’s daughter, would never have made it to No 10 without their blessing. She was appointed to undermine WN in Britian and promote multiculturalism, which has been so devisive to the UK. She also oversaw the process of de-industrialisation by shutting down or selling off major industries, so that Britian became a nation dependent on its (Jewish owned) banking and service sector (now outsourced to its former colonies).

I am going to short cut my response to your “race” (wrong word choice – you mean color) immigration comments.

Color has a racial correlation.

The problem is that in today’s technologically rich environment the record makes a clear case that positioning/socialization against blacks was overwhelmingly unfair

Why? By what edict do Blacks have a right to integrate with Whites and their societies the world over? By the edict of self interested Blacks? Irrelevant. By the self interested moral logic of Blacks? Irrelevant. By the political logic of White enemies? Doubly irrelevant to the point that its almost a moral mandate to act in opposition to their destructive and hostile aims.

and one of the tools to ensure that unfairness was to import masses of whites,

Why? Its only fair that people import their own extended family into their society. No one else can claim inheritance. Blacks should make societies in their majority nations wherein foreign Blacks want to be imported and the natives want to import them. Blacks have nothing to do with Whites nor their societies.

when there were masses of blacks who needed that access, even low rung ladder access.

Except that they have nothing to do with Whites and our extended families need that access and have more of a right to it, by virtue of our relation to them and desire for them over Blacks that have nothing to do with us.

And by melding color to immigration policy you undermine the primary case of protecting sovereignty because outwardly it and perhaps in reality, it is merely just another color superiority ploy.

Nationalism has always been ethnic and was first instituted to solve the massive wars and destruction that imperialism was causing in Europe.

And by doing so, you fuel the very opposition you intend to challenge.

Your theory is that by not giving our land, resources, and our racial existence to racial strangers we are fueling opposition because the opposition wants our land, resources, and access to our men and women? So be it. If there is any war that has ever been worth fighting, its that one.

your line of thought or intent is not aligned with Christ.

What line of thought / intent is that?

tsk tsk correction:

Just take your bibles and dump them in the bin on your way in or on your way out. Because it’s a very safe bet your line of thought or intent is not aligned with Christ.

As if Blacks and Whites can or will ever be united in any meaningful way. The mere notion is immoral, as it mandates the destruction of the latter.

Blacks don’t want “race war” if they are predicted to lose something because White awareness is too high or engaged, but as soon as there is something to gain then its back to their race war engaged in any manner in which they can get away with it.

Don’t be fooled: the capitalist ‘right’ has always favored immigration, because it simultaneously drives down wages while driving up rent. For the business/asset-owning class then, what’s not to like about immigration? Quality-of-life concerns, like crime, etc., only affect those not lucky to live in the gated community with good (i.e., not black) schools.

As far as Libertarianism is concerned, it should be obvious that it is simply another Jewish, anti-white ideology, just like Bolshevism. (Come to think of it, at least the latter puts some rhetorical emphasis on the idea of the collective, which is completely absent from the former.)

The primary concern, in light of historical examples, should be that, contrary to hysterical media narratives, multicultural right-wing populism of the variety espoused by both Trump and Thatcher has a confounding rather than galvanising effect on the basic instinct of Whites to assert and pursue their interests.

All of that’s very true, Andrew. The problem is that, while overtly anti-white parties and politicians may well galvanize whites when in power, they accomplish this by doing them tremendous harm in the process. So it’s basically six of one, half a dozen of the other, I’m afraid. What are we going to do?

And those who are bemoaning the morality and sanity of conscience as invading large portions of whites in the US —–

Just take your bibles and dump them in the bin on your way in or on your way out. Because it’s a very safe bet your line of thought or intent is aligned with Christ.

I am going to short cut my response to your “race” (wrong word choice – you mean color) immigration comments.

The problem is that in today’s technologically rich environment the record makes a clear case that positioning/socialization against blacks was overwhelmingly unfair and one of the tools to ensure that unfairness was to import masses of whites, when there were masses of blacks who needed that access, even low rung ladder access.

And by melding color to immigration policy you undermine the primary case of protecting sovereignty because outwardly it and perhaps in reality, it is merely just another color superiority ploy. And by doing so, you fuel the very opposition you intend to challenge. So instead of immigration and nationality, it is a broad tend to “racialism” and that makes it hard to support.

I may lose, but I am going support nationalism as opposed to the dark attempt top replace any US citizen. And unlike the president, regardless of the loss — I am going to defend the citizens of the US whether they like me or hate me or vice versa.

There is no Thatcher effect, the truth is Great Britain had colonies. She told those native populations during colonial rule that they were in fact British citizens — and her failure to act accordingly is one reason why her colonial empire retracted. Millions of those natives fought bravely alongside whites in defending British interests and yet very little of the benefits of their local riches were bestowed on them.

Even the people pf the colonial powers are eventually going to conceded to conscience if they have one.

Your problem here is that what the poster advertises is not a reflection of reality. I a a conservative, and I think that poster reflects an ideal of what the republican party claimed. But at the end of the day, they policies that my party espoused reinforced was an order that was decidedly not based on character, talent or outcomes, but heavily color reinforcement.

My party did not seek to overhaul the policies and practices that targeted blacks in place since slavery and after. Instead it pretended that merely saying the words and slapping up the rhetoric was in fact reality — it wasn’t then and it isn’t now. Sadly, not then, and not now. And based on the rhetoric it’s not going to be the case in the future. A kind of blind willful ignorance still pervades the content of political territory that conservatives and republicans should own and should have owned since the end of slavery. Maybe had they not allowed themselves the embraced the practiced predicated on smkin color that might not be the case.

As for immigration, I don’t trust this president any further than I can see him. I am not going to applaud the hat trick by either arty to favor noncitizens of any color, any nationality, any ethnicity over and citizen for any reason.

I give Thatcher and Trump the benefit of the doubt. The exchange with Whitelaw, wonder who was writing those letters supporting Vietnamese immigrants, shows that it is about building sufficient support amongst the establishment, or replacing them, rather than one individual. Thatcher had a network around her not interested, or hostile to, the national question, so does Trump. Yes, they could pick new people but ultimately it is the battle of ideas that matter, and it is here we must engage. This is the way the Jewish left achieved hegemony.

IIRC there was no real difference in non-white immigration numbers under Thatcher than under Callaghan. However, Callaghan Thatcher and Major were much much better than Blair. Compared to Blair they all look like alt right heroes.

I think that you work for the non-partisan powers that be. Anyone who whips up race war does, right or left, whether they know it or not. Identity Politics is Race War is Divide and Conquer. Do the math.

Powell was speaking about mass immigration to Britain solely in terms of black vs white, and in that respect, it can’t be said that blacks have the “whip hand”, as he put it, over the natives. However, what he didn’t factor in is Islamic immigration, which has turned out to be far more pernicious. Islamic immigration has damaged Britain beyond Powell’s wildest nightmares, and even a cursory read of the parallel legal system Muslims have established in Britain; the pusillanimous legal response to the mass child gang rape (i.e., genuine rape culture) perpetrated wherever Muslims have congregated in large numbers; the fact that criticism of Islam/the Quran is totally verboten, while mocking Christianity is de rigueur and encouraged; is testament to the fact that Islam has carved itself a superior social position – indeed, an unassailable beachhead – in Britain. By allowing mass Islamic immigration, and succombing to the intolerance of this minority, we have indeed heaped fuel on the “funeral pyre” of our own nation, Might take a few hundred years, but Britain will inexorably Islamise, like the Egyptians before us.

This Derbyshire chap is losing his mind. I’m glad you’re onto him. He’s afraid of Jews. His son joined the military because he needed to be straightened out. Derbyshire and his Chinese tiger mama were unable to bring him up properly. I first heard of him about 7 years ago when I came across a review of his book “We are Doomed.” I thought it an odd book and ignored it. When I started reading VDare, his articles about immigration were interesting. But when I found out his wife was Chinese, I had to take another look at his beliefs. He would talk about the dangers facing the West, but he imported a Chinese woman and had Chinese offspring. I noticed he began writing more and more about his family and the information he gave was appalling. He outed himself as a Sinophile and has written that Asians are superior to whites. In my comment #19, I listed so many other things that don’t add up to someone who says he is defending the West. The only reason I think VDare keeps him on is because Peter Brimelow is also from England and they probably talk a lot about pre-Enoch Powell England. At least Brimelow married Caucasian women and has Caucasian offspring. Deep down Derbyshire must regret what he did with this Chinese woman, but he is perversely refusing to acknowledge his mistake and wants the West to conform to his degeneracy.

It was the height of hypocrisy for Powell to moan about foreigners in Britain. One historian said he came from a family of aristocratic feudal barons who in medieval times robbed Ireland of its best crop-growing land. While black people came here to work his clan went over there to steal, and no doubt it took real rivers of blood for them to achieve that because the Irish would not have just given it over.

Apologies, Miss Hun. Our paths haven’t met because I very rarely read the comments or comment on Mr Derbyshire’s articles. Usually, it’s just a quick once over to get the gist of the article.
But you are right, Derbyshire’s punches are often pulled and his criticisms of Jewish interests driving immigration and foreign policies are often mealy-mouthed. Indeed, his son even joined the marines, where he could have been used in combat to help make the Middle East safe for Israel.
If you can’t persuade your family, then maybe it is time to shut up.

“Verymuchalive…” I don’t remember you so you must have just risen from the dead. Also, I’m a girl. There are new readers to this site, so I have to expose Derbyshire to these people. This is why I also write that people should always cherchez la femme/le homme/la famille of these “nationalist” writers. Derbyshire is not kosher. (((Ilana Mercer))) is another who is haram.

I listened to the the BBC replicant of the Rivers of Blood speech. They would only play five or six minutes at a pop, before interrupting it with —what sounded to my artillery-deafened ears— as only lefty SJW multiculticulti commentary; in doses apparently larger than the replicant speech segments. The program host was himself an immigrant, or a descendant thereof, of subcontinental origins. And —quite apposite to Mt. Derbyshire’s essay above— MP Powell’s great dismay at what was happening in the USA in the preceding weeks was not Lester Maddox-style reactionary racist anger at the civil rights movement —as was bald-facedly misrepresented by the Beeb— but rather his despair over the inner city riots which were right then tearing America apart and which seemed both unstoppable and incurable. Fair enough on that!

On the other hand, maybe the Beeb was playing 3D chess or something…like that famous New Yorker cartoon of a Soviet-era abstract expressionist painter cleverly getting away with mounting a gallery expo of proscribed Non-Socialist Realism, by insetting all of his large canvases with a little representational image of Nikita Kruschchev wagging his finger disapprovingly. You don’t think so, ehhh?