thanks tac,
we live in Abusurdistan
Nukes aren’t defensive weapons and couldn’t be used to stop an invasion. Israel could be invaded and taken down much more quickly than any of its neighbors. Only having a defender like the US has allowed Israel to survive this long.
Isruel would not exist without the USA and the fact that they have 100 nukes, the Samson option.
In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel –
Israel can exist without the USA. Nukes are a pretty good life insurance. How it would fare without US taxpayers’ money is another matter. You should bear in mind though that Jews rule the banks, the media, the entertainment, the justice, and the education in the whole Western world, not only in the US.
If they take out Russia, Russia will take out Israel so Israel will be a dead king. The Zionists should better reign in the neocons if they want there to be an Israel.
Global domination for neocons is not an end in itself, it is a means to an end... and that end is the enhancement of the security of the Jewish state.
For neocons,... it’s global domination, for Zionists, it’s Greater Israel...
Surely, you jest. The neocons like Robert Kaganovitch and his wife Victoria Nudelman, Willian Kristol, David Frum, etc, are obsessed with Russia as Russia is the sponsor of both Iran and Syria, which supply Hezbollah the means by which to keep Israel out of Lebanon.
... but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn’t help at all achieve the Zionists’ goals.
While the former is true, the latter isn’t.
In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel
On this, we both can agree.
The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.
If the US and its suppletives take on Russia, Israel becomes fair game. So to take out Russia, neocons would have to sacrify Israel. That’s where the Khazars diverge from mainstream Zionism. What’s the use of being God’s “chosen people” if you don’t rule the world but then what’s the use of ruling the world if there is no Israel?
Zionist support of neocon agenda may well terminate their beloved creature’s existence in the ME so they should think twice before pushing their US vassal to attack Russia.
To Ptrick Lang:
“The neocons believe so strongly that America must lead the world and mankind forward that they accept the idea that the achievement of human progress justifies any means needed to advance that goal.”
This statement has thrown me for a loop. It raises a few questions, like:
What are the neocons?
Aren`t the neocons Zionists?
What are the Zionists?
The neocons/Zionists are for “the achievement of human progress”, now?
What is “human progress”?
If neocons are Zionists, how does “America must lead the world and mankind forward” play into this, shouldn`t it state Israel, instead?
Why is “America must lead the world and mankind forward” seemingly equated with “the achievement of human progress”?
Why wasn`t it explained that “the end justifies the means” is a fallacious concept, since, if used, “the means” BECOME “the end” (humans, after all, are creatures of habit, in other words, addicts)?
Thank you.
For additional research on this subject see MoA:
I saw this in the brochure:
Refuge for the Jews..
Guard the flank of the Suez for the British..
Western capitalist power against the Arab Soviet back Socialists for the cold warriors..
Democracy in the Middle East for Americans..
Jesus is coming soon for the Evangelicals ..
Access to oil for the Investment bankers ..
Something in it for everyone, yay.
Whew! Thanks for the link. I’d like to claim the title of “more zany commenter” for coining the phrase ‘corpses in his closet’ … but that honor goes to bjondo. ["In addition to corpses in his closet, wonder how much looted Russian loot in his off-shore account(s)?"]
Trouble is, bjondo and I were referring to Jeffrey Sachs. Pat Lang must believe every comment under his article is about him. Sad. One can only hope he reads his “top secret” “classified” information more carefully.
Meanwhile, he chose not to respond to my genuine concern. Why is he entitled (if he did) to castigate Larry Wilkerson…[pot calling kettle].? Why should Lang be forgiven, Wilkerson not? And BTW, Lang seems to have no remorse, so why forgive him at all?
As for the rest of his “Commenter Delusions” you’re quite right, Heros. Seems the man won’t tolerate to hear any other view than precisely his own.
Lang hightailed it out of the Unz comment section back to the safety of his own blog where he promptly bans and/or abuses anyone who he disagrees with.
Not before making an ass of himself in this comment section.
His loss. That’s why unz.com is growing and the colonel’s blog is a tiny circle-jerk, like a thousand other circle-jerks on the WWW. The supply-demand ratio is not in his favour. Ah, well…
It’s a package deal. If they take out Russia, global domination is virtually assured and Israel will get the World’s crown sooner or later. At the heart of it there’s a messianic lunacy and that’s why we’re facing WW3 at, say, 90% probability.
Nice try. Neocons, like most liberal Jews, were originally leftists who crossed over the political divide because they realized, especially after witnessing The Left's resistance to the Vietnam War, progressivism would lead to a non-interventionist US foreign policy, spelling disaster for the Jewish state. In other words, Israel is the neocons raison d'être... without it, they would rejoin most of their brethren who reside on the left of the political spectrum. If you require proof of this, just look at how the neocons easily switched over to the Democrats and HC during the 2016 presidential campaign, when Trump promised to end the regime-change wars. That's because the only thing conservative about the neoconservatives is their support for a more hawkish foreign policy, for the benefit of the Jewish state.
I think it far from absurd to make the distinction between neocons and Zionists, since neocons will certainly not disappear even if Israel disappeared.
Very good post.
Rumors about the intelligence and impeccable honesty of the Brits are highly exaggerated: “The Skripal Affair: A Lie Too Far? by Michael Jabara Carley” http://www.voltairenet.org/article200813.html
“The Russian government, in fact, proposed that the alleged poisoning of the Skripals should be examined by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in The Hague, according to procedures to which Britain itself had agreed when the OPCW was established in 1997. …
The British attempted hijacking of the OPCW has compromised its independence… Moreover, since the BZ toxin is made by the US, Britain and other NATO countries, it begs the same questions, which the Tories put to Moscow: How did the perpetrators obtain the BZ toxin and bring it to Salisbury? Did MI5 or MI6 authorise a false flag attack against the Skripals, or was it authorised by the British cabinet or by the prime minister alone? Or did British authorities lose control of their stockpiles? The trail of evidence does not lead to Moscow; it leads to London.
A prima facie case can be made that the British government is lying about the Skripal affaire. … British authorities are now saying that they have other top-secret evidence, which explains everything, but unfortunately, it can’t be publicised. …
Given all the evidence, can any person with reasonable abilities to think critically believe anything the Tories are saying about the Salisbury affair?
“They are liars. And they know that they are liars,” the late Egyptian writer and Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz once wrote: “And we know that they are liars. Even so, they keep lying….” Mahfouz was not writing about the British, but all the same, he could have been. Are not his well-known lines apposite to the present government in London?”
Like the Yankee coward he is, Lang hightailed it out of the Unz comment section back to the safety of his own blog where he promptly bans and/or abuses anyone who he disagrees with. This is typical Yankee behavior, cowardly running away and then crowing about victory once they are certain their opponents can no longer reach them.
http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2018/04/commenter-delusions.html#disqus_thread
Lang lightly addresses a few comments in this post from the safety of his own blog, but he ignores the stinky pile of elephant dung following him where ever he goes: War Crimes.
Every year they seem to drag up another poor conscripted German labor camp guard, who as a teenager in 1945 is still somehow guilty of war crimes now. These guys weren’t even officers.
Lang was in intelligence during Vietnam, when operation Pheonix was in force, which was the equivalent to the Nazi Einsatzgruppen. As the years have passed and the lies have slowly been pealed back about things like Tonkin and the secret bombings, it becomes clear to all non-Yankees that these were egregious war crimes and crimes against humanity. If we consider the complete aftermath of Pol Pot and the fall of Vietnam, the US army has more deaths and crimes to atone for than the German army did, without even considering what has gone on in the middle east since the US recognized Israel, a “country” with no official borders.
The problem is that there are millions of Yankee war criminals in the US collecting pensions, getting paid for appearances on talk shows, and basking in all that gratitude for their service. Even worse, they form little clubs, like SST, where they pat each other on the back and exchange tidbits of war criminal manna. I am referring to “intelligence”.
This entire Comey/McCabe/Muller/Clinton kubuki theatre that we are forced to endure revolves around “classified” information. Information that only these insiders are allowed to know about, which is clearly sold and leaked at will by those at the top of the food chain. This is the military war criminal manna. They can use and profit from this secret knowledge for decades after they have left “service”.
In Lang’s case, he can post juicy tidbits on his blog that he shares with other insider Yankee war criminals and know that the public will come to learn these great secrets, despite the abuse he heaps on anyone who questions anything they are told because of his deep insider knowledge.
So now that we finally know what a sham all this “top secret” information is, I would propose that it be used a the criteria for determining war crimes when the US finally faces judgment on the misery she has created for humanity. Low level security clearance means a couple of very hungry years in a re-education camp. High level security clearance means testicle crushing to extract forced confessions.
Not before making an ass of himself in this comment section.
Lang hightailed it out of the Unz comment section back to the safety of his own blog where he promptly bans and/or abuses anyone who he disagrees with.
IN ADDITION to the punishment of the criminals themselves.
In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel –
Isruel would not exist without the USA and the fact that they have 100 nukes, the Samson option.
Targeted assassinations, the Jews do it, the anti Zionist movement should do it also. Oye vey do I have a list. (Grin) Surprisingly many are shabbos goys.
For neocons,… it’s global domination, for Zionists, it’s Greater Israel…
Global domination for neocons is not an end in itself, it is a means to an end… and that end is the enhancement of the security of the Jewish state.
… but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn’t help at all achieve the Zionists’ goals.
Surely, you jest. The neocons like Robert Kaganovitch and his wife Victoria Nudelman, Willian Kristol, David Frum, etc, are obsessed with Russia as Russia is the sponsor of both Iran and Syria, which supply Hezbollah the means by which to keep Israel out of Lebanon.
In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel
While the former is true, the latter isn’t.
The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.
On this, we both can agree.
Nice try. Neocons, like most liberal Jews, were originally leftists who crossed over the political divide because they realized, especially after witnessing The Left's resistance to the Vietnam War, progressivism would lead to a non-interventionist US foreign policy, spelling disaster for the Jewish state. In other words, Israel is the neocons raison d'être... without it, they would rejoin most of their brethren who reside on the left of the political spectrum. If you require proof of this, just look at how the neocons easily switched over to the Democrats and HC during the 2016 presidential campaign, when Trump promised to end the regime-change wars. That's because the only thing conservative about the neoconservatives is their support for a more hawkish foreign policy, for the benefit of the Jewish state.
I think it far from absurd to make the distinction between neocons and Zionists, since neocons will certainly not disappear even if Israel disappeared.
Neocons would be neocons with or without Israel. The tribal aspect is undisputable, there are overlapping interests, but the goals are different. For neocons, as for Soros progressives who are also far from being all Zionists, it’s global domination, for Zionists, it’s Greater Israel, which does btw encompass more land than just the mythical Eretz Israel.
Obviously, the neocons’ God complex has a lot to do with being “the chosen people” and obviously their rise to prominence wouldn’t have been possible without help from fellow “chosen people” so it’s not such a bad idea to root for Israel, but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn’t help at all achieve the Zionists’ goals. The latter don’t put all their eggs in one basket, and they do in fact have a lot of activity in the back of their American protector but if the USA goes down, the neocons / Soros liberals are gone too.
In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel – though they’d have to find other ways to pominence than Zionist money -, they’re both phenomenons of the same tribe but one can be contained and can be made to accomodate itself with that containment, the others represent a real threat to Planet Earth. The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.
Global domination for neocons is not an end in itself, it is a means to an end... and that end is the enhancement of the security of the Jewish state.
For neocons,... it’s global domination, for Zionists, it’s Greater Israel...
Surely, you jest. The neocons like Robert Kaganovitch and his wife Victoria Nudelman, Willian Kristol, David Frum, etc, are obsessed with Russia as Russia is the sponsor of both Iran and Syria, which supply Hezbollah the means by which to keep Israel out of Lebanon.
... but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn’t help at all achieve the Zionists’ goals.
While the former is true, the latter isn’t.
In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel
On this, we both can agree.
The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.
“PERSONALIZED, INDIVIDUALIZED punishment is needed for the neocon criminals and their MSM stooges”
– Agree. The ill-gotten fortunes must be reappropriated from the criminals’ progeny and invested into the restoration of the damaged countries.
The metaphysical certitude one takes from Realist’s rants is that realism rejects rationality.
Anonymous[107],
Ya — it’s sad – what grade do you think he is in?
Think Peace — Art
p.s. He probably gets high marks in yeshiva hate Gentiles class.
You’re a weird little fuck.
Realist — shame on you – does your mommy know you use those words — Art
I think it far from absurd to make the distinction between neocons and Zionists, since neocons will certainly not disappear even if Israel disappeared.
Nice try. Neocons, like most liberal Jews, were originally leftists who crossed over the political divide because they realized, especially after witnessing The Left’s resistance to the Vietnam War, progressivism would lead to a non-interventionist US foreign policy, spelling disaster for the Jewish state. In other words, Israel is the neocons raison d’être… without it, they would rejoin most of their brethren who reside on the left of the political spectrum. If you require proof of this, just look at how the neocons easily switched over to the Democrats and HC during the 2016 presidential campaign, when Trump promised to end the regime-change wars. That’s because the only thing conservative about the neoconservatives is their support for a more hawkish foreign policy, for the benefit of the Jewish state.
What we know as neoconism today has existed before Israel came into existence. I think it far from absurd to make the distinction between neocons and Zionists, since neocons will certainly not disappear even if Israel disappeared.
Neocons have more to do with Trotsky than with Zionism, there are overlapping interests but I think Israel just happens to be a convenient anchor point and a way to enlist wealthy Zionist Jews rather than an end in itself. Leading neocons are Jews indeed but Trotsky too was a Jew and he was no Zionist. If neocons judge that Israel has become an impediment to the fulfilment of their ambitions, it is not implausible that they become much less supportive of Israeli policies.
I’d say that neocons are simply the latest instance of men suffering from a God complex while Zionism is somewhat less ambitious. Neocons are the real threat to the world, Israel is merely an annoyance. It is far more important to stop the neocons than to stop Israel.
Nice try. Neocons, like most liberal Jews, were originally leftists who crossed over the political divide because they realized, especially after witnessing The Left's resistance to the Vietnam War, progressivism would lead to a non-interventionist US foreign policy, spelling disaster for the Jewish state. In other words, Israel is the neocons raison d'être... without it, they would rejoin most of their brethren who reside on the left of the political spectrum. If you require proof of this, just look at how the neocons easily switched over to the Democrats and HC during the 2016 presidential campaign, when Trump promised to end the regime-change wars. That's because the only thing conservative about the neoconservatives is their support for a more hawkish foreign policy, for the benefit of the Jewish state.
I think it far from absurd to make the distinction between neocons and Zionists, since neocons will certainly not disappear even if Israel disappeared.
Jimmy Dore interviews Carla Ortiz on Syria/White Helmets:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCu8mNC1JyE&feature=youtu.be&a=
My o my - this "Realist" guy is going bonkers - easy boy - you are going to blow a gasket.
There is a cult of hatred for all things Jewish here. It is true that many Jews have attributes that are less than admirable, but many of you assholes are off your meds…..insane.
As I have said who the fuck allows Jews to get away with all the nefarious things you don’t like?
It’s gentiles….you dickheads. Gentiles vastly outnumber Jews
Strenuously criticizing Jews — even going to the pains of NAMING the nefarious evil-doer Jews, even those “many Jews [who] have attributes that are less than admirable,” — is WRONG, “insane,” per Realist,
but the reason “Jews . . .are allowed . . . to get away with all the nefarious things you don’t like” is that “gentiles are fucked-up dickheads . . .assholes [who] are off your meds…..insane.”
The metaphysical certitude one takes from Realist’s rants is that realism rejects rationality.
My o my - this "Realist" guy is going bonkers - easy boy - you are going to blow a gasket.
There is a cult of hatred for all things Jewish here. It is true that many Jews have attributes that are less than admirable, but many of you assholes are off your meds…..insane.
As I have said who the fuck allows Jews to get away with all the nefarious things you don’t like?
It’s gentiles….you dickheads. Gentiles vastly outnumber Jews
You’re a weird little fuck.
There is a cult of hatred for all things Jewish here. It is true that many Jews have attributes that are less than admirable, but many of you assholes are off your meds.....insane.
For The Giraldi Family adults here @ U.R.
There is a cult of hatred for all things Jewish here. It is true that many Jews have attributes that are less than admirable, but many of you assholes are off your meds…..insane.
As I have said who the fuck allows Jews to get away with all the nefarious things you don’t like?
It’s gentiles….you dickheads. Gentiles vastly outnumber Jews
My o my – this “Realist” guy is going bonkers – easy boy – you are going to blow a gasket.
Accept the truth of Jew wrong doing – Jesus said “the truth will set you free.”
You do not have to live in consent fear – you can be free. Try it!
One look at evil little Israel and its killer life force and we can see that we are on the right side of history.
We are happy in our idealism. You are always to be angry and sad. Poor you.
Think Peace — Do No Harm — Maintain Hope — Art
EXACTLY.
PERSONALIZED, INDIVIDUALIZED punishment is needed for the neocon criminals and their MSM stooges. Nothing else will stop or dissuade them from continuing with what they have been doing. These psychopaths are the enemies of BOTH the Western peoples AND the rest of humanity.
They have been getting off scot-free for three decades now. That scot-freeness has got to END.
“….bribed, shmoozed and bought their way….”
Don’t forget blackmailed …. which is exactly why Bloody Gina is in line for CIA Director. Her vulnerability is priceless.
But why the fatalism? What’s your racket? Here at Unz, such a defeatist surrender is interpreted as treason or hasbara.
Priti Patel forced to resign over unofficial meetings with Israelis
Theresa May’s government was rocked on Wednesday by a second cabinet resignation in a week after Priti Patel was forced to step down as international development secretary.
The minister quit after being summoned back from a trip to Uganda and Ethiopia by Downing Street after it emerged she failed to be candid with May about 14 unofficial meetings with Israeli ministers, businesspeople and a senior lobbyist.
Priti Patel forced to resign over unofficial meetings with Israelis
From the article: Six days of revelations about Patel’s meetings dominated headlines. On Monday it emerged that she had spoken to the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, in August in a meeting that May did not know about and with no officials present. Thirteen meetings were held in the presence of Lord Polak, an experienced Tory lobbyist.
RobinG,
Lord Polak is a Jew, active in Brit/Israeli politics. This is a major deal causing May much trouble. All of Britain knows that there is a Jew dual loyalty problem in their country. The Jews run a shadow state in Britain. Everyone knows it.
Pro-Palestinian Labor leader – Jeremy Corbyn – is going to come to power in Britain. The Jew have politically failed at getting rid of him.
It is going to happen. The world turns.
Think Peace — Art
“I just hope the American people aren’t that gullible and stupid.”
Well, they are. And as the author points out, America’s Israel-first Zionists have for decades now bribed, shmoozed and bought their way with all the key players in the top positions of government and military–or occupy these positions outright. Wolfowitz under GW’s regime; Bolton now back; pro-Israeli journos like Goldberg, Kreuthammer, Friedman, the list is endless. Adelson. AIPAC owns congress, face it.
We’re fucked. There is no stopping them. Get ready for a major conflagration: WWIII will begin with Syria, then Iran. Russia/China/Iran vs USA NATO.
Get your kicks now, ’cause the whole shithouse is going up in flames.
Well, shit. I thought we all suffered from that one. I’m eaten up with it myself.
“War is Good for Business”: Insider Trading, Secret Information and the US-led Attack against Syria” by Michel Chossudovsky: https://www.globalresearch.ca/war-is-good-for-business-insider-trading-secret-information-and-the-us-led-attack-against-syria/5637056
“Did a handful of powerful financial operators have secret information (handed to them by politicians in high office) which enabled them to predict the outcome and “place their financial bets” on a rise in the stock values of major defense contractors? …
Are we talking about billions of dollars accruing to the families and/ or cronies of top US, UK, French government officials? The bonanza earnings resulting from equity transactions as well as the trade in options needs to be carefully assessed.
Powerful financial actors have access to foreknowledge pertaining to crucial political and military decisions (e.g. through their social ties to politicians).”
— The western arsonists are OK with the upcoming catastrophe prepared by the warmongering rhetoric.
As for Stalin and War Experience, give me a break. A Token Leadership Position in Russia's Internecine Civil Skirmishes, as bloody as they may have been, does not a War Expert make.
Some historians have even suggested that Stalin suffered some kind of nervous breakdown. Another, less popular theory is that Stalin deliberately withdrew from the scene, to avoid being ousted from power. When he saw that no one was about to challenge his authority he decided to take control of the situation. [9]
Stalin’s reputation as a military leader is a hotly contested issue. He appointed himself the People’s Commissar for Defense in July 1941 and the commander in chief of the Soviet armed forces in August. As commander in chief, Stalin presided over the Supreme Command headquarters charged with the overall supervision, planning, and coordination of all military operations. Stalin possessed certain qualities, including a sharp memory, the ability to get to the root of the matter, and tremendous willpower, that distinguish military leaders.
However, he lacked formal military education and military experience. Too often Stalin relied on the crude tactics of throwing masses of soldiers into frontal attacks that resulted in the prodigal waste of manpower. Many commentators blame Stalin for the incompetent meddling in military decision making during the first year of the war and for the exorbitant cost that the Red Army paid for their commander in chief’s “crash course” in military science.
Despite the success in repelling the Nazis from Moscow in December 1941, the series of defeats continued into the first half of 1942. Germans took some of the vital agricultural areas and came close to seizing Stalingrad (now Volgograd) on the Volga and occupying North Caucasus. The situation at the front began to improve for the Soviets only from around August 1942. Significantly, this turnaround coincided with the establishment of the post of deputy to commander in chief and the appointment of Army General Georgy Zhukov to it. From that time on, Stalin increasingly relied on his deputy’s superior military knowledge and expertise in planning military operations.
The situation at the front began to improve for the Soviets only from around August 1942. Significantly, this turnaround coincided with the establishment of the post of deputy to commander in chief and the appointment of Army General Georgy Zhukov to it. From that time on, Stalin increasingly relied on his deputy’s superior military knowledge and expertise in planning military operations.
That’s true enough. Apparently Zhukov was the decisive voice on the acceptance of the successful strategic plan for the encirclement of German 6th Army at Stalingrad in November 1942 – overriding Stalin’s doubts – but Stalin did make it clear that Zhukov’s head depended on a positive result.
Know the important presstitutes: https://consortiumnews.com/2018/01/28/unpacking-the-shadowy-outfit-behind-2017s-biggest-fake-news-story/
“Unpacking the Shadowy Outfit Behind 2017’s Biggest Fake News Story:” propornot
Michael Weiss is the Editor-in-Chief at the InterpreterMag.com. According to his Linkd profile, he is also a National Security Analyst for CNN since July 2017 as well as an Investigative Reporter for International Affairs for CNN since April 2017. He has been a contributor there since 2015. He has been a Senior Editor at The Daily Beast since June 2015.
Catherine A. Fitzpatrick is a Russian translator and analyst for the Interpreter. She has worked as an editor for EurasiaNet.org and the former Cold War project funded by the CIA, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL).
Pierre Vaux is an analyst and translator for the Interpreter. He is a contributor to the Daily Beast, Foreign Policy, RFE/RL and Left Foot Forward and works at Dataminr Inc.
James Miller is a Managing Editor of The Interpreter where he reports on Russia, Ukraine, and Syria. He is a contributor at Reuters, The Daily Beast, Foreign Policy, and other publications. Miller also works for the U.S. Embassy in Kiev “diplo-page” the Kiev Post.
The Interpreter is a product of the Atlantic Council. Fellows working with the Atlantic Council in this area include:
Bellingcat – Aric Toler and Eliot Higgins – This linked article shows how an underwear salesman became one of the most important faces of the deep state.
Anne Applebaum – a committed Russophobe
Irena Chalupa – a sister of Alexandra Chalupa that brought the term Russian hacking to worldwide attention. Irena Chalupa is a nonresident fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center. She works with and for Ukrainian Intelligence through the Atlantic Council, Stopfake.org, and her sisters Andrea (EuromaidanPR) and Alexandra.
Dimitry Alperovich – a CEO of Crowdstrike and a person who guessed Russia may have hacked something, somewhere, sometime.
Ah, The Saker.
It’s incredible the attention this obvious Provocateur receives. He really knows how to Play It, I’ll give him that.
I have no doubt, being a descendant of White Russians, The Saker has a particular fondness for Ivan Ilyin, as does Putin, and I think Ilyin is the Tie that Binds The Saker and Putin and Fascists everywhere it seems.
This article explains.
The presstitutes are in a panic mode: http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/19/technology/youtube-ads-extreme-content-investigation/index.html
The whoring Paul P. Murphy, Kaya Yurieff, and Gianluca Mezzofiore play three imbeciles that have discovered (oh, horror!) that The Jimmy Dore Show does not comply with the “deciders” orders:
“The Jimmy Dore Show channel, a far-left YouTube channel that peddles conspiracy theories, such as the idea that Syrian chemical weapons attacks are hoaxes.”
Could you imagine? — Jimmy dares to question the pronouncement of the US-funded White Helmets and the whole CIA-guided establishment at the MSM, including the whoring CNN and The New York Times!
Poor Murphy, Yurieff, and Mezzofiore are terrified of the reality where the intelligent people with integrity rely on the facts and pursue the truth.
No he didn't - he had a nervous breakdown.
The Nazis were at Moscow’s Doorstep and Stalin was all set to flee the Russian Capital to a Spider Hole in the Countryside when at the last minute, or second actually, he decided to remain and tough it out.
http://www.historyinanhour.com/2011/07/01/stalins-breakdown/
Either way, after three days, a small delegation came knocking at his door. Headed by Molotov (pictured to Stalin’s right), Lavrentii Beria(Stalin’s Chief of Secret Police), Kliment Voroshilov (Defence, to Stalin’s left) and Anastas Mikoyan (Foreign Trade), they found Stalin sitting at his desk. He had on his face a look of fear. Mikoyan later wrote, “I have no doubt – he decided we had come to arrest him.” Stalin was looking thinner, haggard and hadn’t changed his clothes.
“Why have you come?” he asked.
Molotov stepped forward, “We’re asking you to return to work.”
Your timing is off. That Sabbatical wasn’t related to his stand in Moscow from a Timing Perspective, however, I have no doubt it informed his decision to stay in Moscow and tough it out. If Stalin was Hitler, Stalin would have gone into an underground bunker and suicided himself and had his body burned. But Stalin was not Hitler, even though both were equally ruthless in their own right.
It’s conjectured he had a Nervous Breakdown. We’ll never know. Maybe he did, or maybe his Sabbatical was more calculated. Those Organic Street Smarts sensed a Coup brewing, considering his paralytic non-response to Hitler’s aggression, and he wanted to draw out the Conspirators. No Coup was forthcoming and those who would be Conspirators were instead his Loyal Champions.
What his Sabbatical proved to him was the Loyalty of his closest Advisors & Confidantes, or his Yes Men if you will. They pleaded for him to return to his Duty and proclaimed that only he could lead Russia at that time. Afterall, Russia loves its Strong Men as witnessed by its Tzarist History.
How did Joseph Stalin react to the German invasion during WWII?
Some historians have even suggested that Stalin suffered some kind of nervous breakdown. Another, less popular theory is that Stalin deliberately withdrew from the scene, to avoid being ousted from power. When he saw that no one was about to challenge his authority he decided to take control of the situation. [9]
As for Stalin and War Experience, give me a break. A Token Leadership Position in Russia’s Internecine Civil Skirmishes, as bloody as they may have been, does not a War Expert make.
The following describes it adequately.
Stalin’s reputation as a military leader is a hotly contested issue. He appointed himself the People’s Commissar for Defense in July 1941 and the commander in chief of the Soviet armed forces in August. As commander in chief, Stalin presided over the Supreme Command headquarters charged with the overall supervision, planning, and coordination of all military operations. Stalin possessed certain qualities, including a sharp memory, the ability to get to the root of the matter, and tremendous willpower, that distinguish military leaders.
However, he lacked formal military education and military experience. Too often Stalin relied on the crude tactics of throwing masses of soldiers into frontal attacks that resulted in the prodigal waste of manpower. Many commentators blame Stalin for the incompetent meddling in military decision making during the first year of the war and for the exorbitant cost that the Red Army paid for their commander in chief’s “crash course” in military science.
Despite the success in repelling the Nazis from Moscow in December 1941, the series of defeats continued into the first half of 1942. Germans took some of the vital agricultural areas and came close to seizing Stalingrad (now Volgograd) on the Volga and occupying North Caucasus. The situation at the front began to improve for the Soviets only from around August 1942. Significantly, this turnaround coincided with the establishment of the post of deputy to commander in chief and the appointment of Army General Georgy Zhukov to it. From that time on, Stalin increasingly relied on his deputy’s superior military knowledge and expertise in planning military operations.
That's true enough. Apparently Zhukov was the decisive voice on the acceptance of the successful strategic plan for the encirclement of German 6th Army at Stalingrad in November 1942 - overriding Stalin's doubts - but Stalin did make it clear that Zhukov's head depended on a positive result.
The situation at the front began to improve for the Soviets only from around August 1942. Significantly, this turnaround coincided with the establishment of the post of deputy to commander in chief and the appointment of Army General Georgy Zhukov to it. From that time on, Stalin increasingly relied on his deputy’s superior military knowledge and expertise in planning military operations.
The war-profiteering fools’ main achievement: http://thesaker.is/a-curious-incident-part-xi/
“An entire generation of Middle Eastern youth is now entering adulthood knowing only the misery of war, a series of destructive conflicts caused by intervening foreign armies. The rich citizens of the west have wreaked unimaginable pain and suffering, destroyed entire functioning societies, and have done so because death and destruction is the enlightened way to “democracy” and “freedom.”
The “deciders” have an illusion of being protected from the vagaries afflicting “small people.” No way. The “deciders”‘ children and grandchildren are already affected by the consequences of their stupid elders’ crimes. There are more problems ahead — named after the Cheney-Bush-Bair criminal triumvirate.
The Enemy of my Enemy is not necessarily my Friend. In the case of The Saker and Putin, they are not my Friends, and if they're your Friends, perhaps you need to think twice about their Designs & Intentions.
Putin’s reinterment of Ilyin’s remains was a mystical release from this contradiction. Ilyin had been expelled from Russia by the Soviet security service; his corpse was reburied alongside the remains of its victims. Putin had Ilyin’s corpse interred at a monastery where the NKVD, the heir to the Cheka and the predecessor of the KGB, had interred the ashes of thousands of Soviet citizens executed in the Great Terror. When Putin later visited the site to lay flowers on Ilyin’s grave, he was in the company of an Orthodox monk who saw the NKVD executioners as Russian patriots and therefore good men. At the time of the reburial, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church was a man who had previously served the KGB as an agent. After all, Ilyin’s justification for mass murder was the same as that of the Bolsheviks: the defense of an absolute good. As critics of his second book in the 1920s put it, Ilyin was a “Chekist for God.” He was reburied as such, with all possible honors conferred by the Chekists and by the men of God—and by the men of God who were Chekists, and by the Chekists who were men of God.
Ilyin was returned, body and soul, to the Russia he had been forced to leave. And that very return, in its inattention to contradiction, in its disregard of fact, was the purest expression of respect for his legacy. To be sure, Ilyin opposed the Soviet system. Yet, once the USSR ceased to exist in 1991, it was history—and the past, for Ilyin, was nothing but cognitive raw material for a literature of eternal virtue. Modifying Ilyin’s views about Russian innocence ever so slightly, Russian leaders could see the Soviet Union not as a foreign imposition upon Russia, as Ilyin had, but rather as Russia itself, and so virtuous despite appearances. Any faults of the Soviet system became necessary Russian reactions to the prior hostility of the West.
Ilyin’s arguments were everywhere as Russian troops entered Ukraine multiple times in 2014. As soldiers received their mobilization orders for the invasion of the Ukraine’s Crimean province in January 2014, all of Russia’s high-ranking bureaucrats and regional governors were sent a copy of Ilyin’s Our Tasks. After Russian troops occupied Crimea and the Russian parliament voted for annexation, Putin cited Ilyin again as justification. The Russian commander sent to oversee the second major movement of Russian troops into Ukraine, to the southeastern provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk in summer 2014, described the war’s final goal in terms that Ilyin would have understood: “If the world were saved from demonic constructions such as the United States, it would be easier for everyone to live. And one of these days it will happen.”
Anyone following Russian politics could see in early 2016 that the Russian elite preferred Donald Trump to become the Republican nominee for president and then to defeat Hillary Clinton in the general election. In the spring of that year, Russian military intelligence was boasting of an effort to help Trump win. In the Russian assault on American democracy that followed, the main weapon was falsehood. Donald Trump is another masculinity-challenged kleptocrat from the realm of fiction, in his case that of reality television. His campaign was helped by the elaborate untruths that Russia distributed about his opponent. In office, Trump imitates Putin in his pursuit of political post-truth: first filling the public sphere with lies, then blaming the institutions whose purpose is to seek facts, and finally rejoicing in the resulting confusion. Russian assistance to Trump weakened American trust in the institutions that Russia has been unable to build. Such trust was already in decline, thanks to America’s own media culture and growing inequality.
Ilyin meant to be the prophet of our age, the post-Soviet age, and perhaps he is. His disbelief in this world allows politics to take place in a fictional one. He made of lawlessness a virtue so pure as to be invisible, and so absolute as to demand the destruction of the West. He shows us how fragile masculinity generates enemies, how perverted Christianity rejects Jesus, how economic inequality imitates innocence, and how fascist ideas flow into the postmodern. This is no longer just Russian philosophy. It is now American life.
The tribal fealty trumps reason.
Tribal fealty can be (and frequently is and has been) rational and reasonable.
I am delighted to see Pat Lang’s article here at the Unz Review.
The Nazis were at Moscow’s Doorstep and Stalin was all set to flee the Russian Capital to a Spider Hole in the Countryside when at the last minute, or second actually, he decided to remain and tough it out.
No he didn’t – he had a nervous breakdown.
Either way, after three days, a small delegation came knocking at his door. Headed by Molotov (pictured to Stalin’s right), Lavrentii Beria(Stalin’s Chief of Secret Police), Kliment Voroshilov (Defence, to Stalin’s left) and Anastas Mikoyan (Foreign Trade), they found Stalin sitting at his desk. He had on his face a look of fear. Mikoyan later wrote, “I have no doubt – he decided we had come to arrest him.” Stalin was looking thinner, haggard and hadn’t changed his clothes.
“Why have you come?” he asked.
Molotov stepped forward, “We’re asking you to return to work.”
http://www.historyinanhour.com/2011/07/01/stalins-breakdown/
As for Stalin and War Experience, give me a break. A Token Leadership Position in Russia's Internecine Civil Skirmishes, as bloody as they may have been, does not a War Expert make.
Some historians have even suggested that Stalin suffered some kind of nervous breakdown. Another, less popular theory is that Stalin deliberately withdrew from the scene, to avoid being ousted from power. When he saw that no one was about to challenge his authority he decided to take control of the situation. [9]
Stalin’s reputation as a military leader is a hotly contested issue. He appointed himself the People’s Commissar for Defense in July 1941 and the commander in chief of the Soviet armed forces in August. As commander in chief, Stalin presided over the Supreme Command headquarters charged with the overall supervision, planning, and coordination of all military operations. Stalin possessed certain qualities, including a sharp memory, the ability to get to the root of the matter, and tremendous willpower, that distinguish military leaders.
However, he lacked formal military education and military experience. Too often Stalin relied on the crude tactics of throwing masses of soldiers into frontal attacks that resulted in the prodigal waste of manpower. Many commentators blame Stalin for the incompetent meddling in military decision making during the first year of the war and for the exorbitant cost that the Red Army paid for their commander in chief’s “crash course” in military science.
Despite the success in repelling the Nazis from Moscow in December 1941, the series of defeats continued into the first half of 1942. Germans took some of the vital agricultural areas and came close to seizing Stalingrad (now Volgograd) on the Volga and occupying North Caucasus. The situation at the front began to improve for the Soviets only from around August 1942. Significantly, this turnaround coincided with the establishment of the post of deputy to commander in chief and the appointment of Army General Georgy Zhukov to it. From that time on, Stalin increasingly relied on his deputy’s superior military knowledge and expertise in planning military operations.
You do understand that your comment was an attempt at complaining — don’t you?Anti-Semites loath ziocons.I guess this might be true but it sure seems to help.
One does not need to be an antisemite to loath zi0cons.
“Only anti-Semites use the term ziocon.”
— This is why the Fifth column of Israel-firsters is unredeemable: The tribal fealty trumps reason.
PS: The free-thinker and great human beings Baruch Spinoza was excommunicated; his grave is still outside of a Jewish cemetery.
He was also a career criminal and these are frequently effective leaders.
Great point. Chalk one up for The Donald.
Eh, prior to WW2 Stalin had leadership positions in:
-Russian civil war
-Polish Soviet war
-Conflicts with the Chinese over the Transsiberian railway
-Conflict with the Japanese at Kalkhin Gol and Lake Khasan
-Winter War
He was also a career criminal and these are frequently effective leaders. (Military historians are also frequently pretty good, ideally a military historian who is also a career criminal or serious revolutionary like Vo Ngyuen Giap).
Great point. Chalk one up for The Donald. ;)
He was also a career criminal and these are frequently effective leaders.
I don’t know what disorder you’re afflicted with
It’s the one where I think I’m sane, normal and rational while most everyone else is looney.
One does not need to be an antisemite to loath zi0cons.
I guess this might be true but it sure seems to help.
You do understand that your comment was an attempt at complaining — don’t you?
Anti-Semites loath ziocons.
Every ziocon loather is an anti-Semite.
Only anti-Semites use the term ziocon.
We would not have this conversation
I think that we might be having different conversations with each other.
I don’t know what disorder you’re afflicted with, but I’ll bet it’s hard to spell.
Nor do I, Chuck. For now, the Mossad can carry out these extrajudicial killings with impunity. If the Pals tried doing the same, there would be a hefty price to pay. For how long?
below is a report on Far East-based “nefarious” activity which I do not like
geokat62 realistically observed & wrote:
“For now, the Mossad can carry out these extrajudicial killings with impunity. If the Pals tried doing the same, there would be a hefty price to pay. For how long?”
Hi geo,
Only a minority of Americans recall the downing of a Malaysian airliner and blame placed upon Russia.
How many know anything about politics in Malaysia and problems with Israel?
Awhile ago, Maven Sam Shama shared joys of Far East business-travels & his having passed out Talmuds to prospective customers. Maybe he’s big in Japan now?
The Maven likely knows some stuff about Malaysia, and perhaps he has read the Jerusalem Post article (below) that covered Israel’s rather recent pout about Prime Minister Najib Razak.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Whither-Malaysia-542778
So a hefty Jewish price to pay for Mossad extrajudicial killings, and you ask “For how long” of a wait, eh?
Well let’s see, geo?
The only answer I can reasonably offer is the fact that ZUS gives Mossad a free & unaccountable pass to go whatever way Tel Aviv wants it to go.
Whither justice? Oh hell, geokat! (Pout, pout) There you asked me something that you do not want to be asked yourself.
Thanks — You “ain’t heavy,” you’re my Brother.
You do understand that your comment was an attempt at complaining — don’t you? We would not have this conversation if not the cowardly behavior of the 52 major American Jewish organizations that have been placing the interests of Israel above the interests of the US.
Stefan Molyneux.
. . .
Watch him pretend to be a gentile, while at another moment disclosing his mother is Jewish…
. . . which explains why Molyneux encourages children to divorce their parents.
We have covered this point already: Colonel Patrick Lang is a human being, not some angelic creature.
Can he be abrasive? – yes, he can. He is a soldier and he can be brutally direct.
For those complaining about the not-enough-gentle treatment on Lang’s blog – the blog is his territory. Don’t like it — don’t enter, particularly because Lang does not appreciate sloppy analytics. Try to create your own blog, under your own name, and try to attract the extraordinary people that participate in discussions on Lang’s blog.
For those “anonymouses” that accuse Lang of being “on Putin’s payroll” and “soft on ziocons,” here is a simple question: How many of the “anonymouses” have refused the lucrative proposals in order to maintain their integrity and loyalty to the interests of their country? — We would never know the answer because they are, well, anonymous.
Colonel Lang does not need my defense; he is a towering figure with the proven record of honesty, professionalism, and courage. This country would be in a much better shape if we had more such people as Lang.
This simply a bigger picture that allows comparing the scales.
Nor do I, Chuck. For now, the Mossad can carry out these extrajudicial killings with impunity. If the Pals tried doing the same, there would be a hefty price to pay. For how long?
below is a report on Far East-based “nefarious” activity which I do not like
At least…
Theresa May’s government was rocked on Wednesday by a second cabinet resignation in a week after Priti Patel was forced to step down as international development secretary.
The minister quit after being summoned back from a trip to Uganda and Ethiopia by Downing Street after it emerged she failed to be candid with May about 14 unofficial meetings with Israeli ministers, businesspeople and a senior lobbyist.
Priti Patel forced to resign over unofficial meetings with Israelis
RobinG,
From the article: Six days of revelations about Patel’s meetings dominated headlines. On Monday it emerged that she had spoken to the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, in August in a meeting that May did not know about and with no officials present. Thirteen meetings were held in the presence of Lord Polak, an experienced Tory lobbyist.
below is a report on Far East-based “nefarious” activity which I do not like
Nor do I, Chuck. For now, the Mossad can carry out these extrajudicial killings with impunity. If the Pals tried doing the same, there would be a hefty price to pay. For how long?
Priti Patel forced to resign over unofficial meetings with Israelis
Theresa May’s government was rocked on Wednesday by a second cabinet resignation in a week after Priti Patel was forced to step down as international development secretary.
The minister quit after being summoned back from a trip to Uganda and Ethiopia by Downing Street after it emerged she failed to be candid with May about 14 unofficial meetings with Israeli ministers, businesspeople and a senior lobbyist.
The term “neoconservative” is used as a euphemism for “jews”, according to Jonah Goldberg.
My God, you found a Jew who said (wrote) blah, blah. Discussion over, no more comments. No need for anyone else to think, read or write.
I am SAIS 1970 . . .
My oh my.
We are in awe at the tonnage of your ass.
countries cannot tolerate disorder or chaos on their borders.
does that apply to countries with no declared borders?
and also to countries who deliberately create chaos on their (non)-borders?
It seems, too, that the best people to make that call are the people in the area, not the US.
At SAIS 1970, what was said about who should pay for the “people who make the call” about putting down — or creating — chaos on their (non) borders?
Except that IsraHell CAUSES disorder and chaos on its (well, there aren’t any, are there?) borders….. and beyond.
You think zionism is simple?
Not according to most anti-Semites.
Not according to most anti-Semites.
You think zionism is simple?
Tell us more, orphan iffen.
Notice that I said “according to most anti-Semites,” not according to iffen.
But since you ask, I do think that it is simple nationalism.
One does not need to be an antisemite to loath zi0cons.
I guess this might be true but it sure seems to help.
The good thing about this CIA attempt to blame the Jews is that it will stoke a lot of hatred of the Jewish State’s fifth column. Then when the tipping point of Zionazi genocide is reached, all the treasonous US-national Mossad agents will go to ground to save their skins and Israel will go down like a ton of bricks. The Palestinian majority will rule.
The Zionists will stop at nothing to protect their enclave. Just who is the terrorist here?
I am SAIS 1970 and the one lesson I got, which was at variance with the place, was simply that countries cannot tolerate disorder or chaos on their borders.
It seems, too, that the best people to make that call are the people in the area, not the US.
My oh my.
I am SAIS 1970 . . .
does that apply to countries with no declared borders?
countries cannot tolerate disorder or chaos on their borders.
At SAIS 1970, what was said about who should pay for the "people who make the call" about putting down -- or creating -- chaos on their (non) borders?
It seems, too, that the best people to make that call are the people in the area, not the US.
Hayden (Michael, CIA) is slick,
Get the L out of there.
Hayden is a sell-out to the dark side/deep state.
Everyone has their shortcomings. I’m not a follower of Lang’s blog, but I hear (from S2C, iirc), that Lang has disparaged Larry Wilkerson for having aided fraudulent war. Pretty hypocritical then, given Lang’s own history.
Now alleged that Lang has accused b. of MoA as anti-American. (((Is that the new anti-Semitism?))) If true, that’s pretty pathetic. There are plenty of Lang fans here, but they should admit his blindside.
Wrong on all counts, but nice try: Your reply is short on facts, but long on bogus accusations.
Hayden (Michael, CIA) is slick, I met him once. Morell (Michael, CIA) is a comical lightweight, a plus to have on the opposing side. A ‘zero’ is a plus. LOL
Get the L out of there.
Hayden (Michael, CIA) is slick,
It is interesting how many Jewish shills come here to assert that they are not jewish. If you dig deeper, you find that it is a disavowal of following in the Jewish faith, but not of being part of the Jewish tribe. A distinction without a difference.
WTFI am not Jewish
Cloak: “A distinction without a difference.”
Indeed.
This ‘realist’ shill reminds me of that annoying asshole and gatekeeper, Stefan Molyneux.
That shill is always going on about how Jews dominate merely by virtue of being much smarter, that’s all, nothing more to see, silly people… the guy is a total fraud.
Watch him pretend to be a gentile, while at another moment disclosing his mother is Jewish…
At around 5:45
. . . which explains why Molyneux encourages children to divorce their parents.
Stefan Molyneux.
. . .
Watch him pretend to be a gentile, while at another moment disclosing his mother is Jewish…
So like the vast majority of Americans, his logic and thinking are befuddled with cognitive dissonance. He can accept contradictions like Good War and Hiroshima. Or ignore and cover up US actions in Vietnam because it was the most important event in his and his war-buddies lifes.
You got an important point: Col. Lang certainly do not have any problems with accepting false narratives in the past. I was amazed by his behavior of shutting down comments on his blog (when he posted a propaganda piece about Stalin) because some commentators pointed out factual problems in there.
But, I will keep following him just because he sometimes provides some glimpse of what the rulers of the US actually think
• Broken Record Dept.You've mangled an aphorism in a manner known as a malapropism. But you're not alone. I've seen other variations, and I was talking about this recently on another thread, where we read that "...the proof is in the putting..."
The proof is in the pudding
I wrote what I meant. But you are funny. Obviously IVY educated. Occupying Jew or paid local?
Time-wasting service free?
There is a cult of hatred for all things Jewish here. It is true that many Jews have attributes that are less than admirable, but many of you assholes are off your meds.....insane.
For The Giraldi Family adults here @ U.R.
SurRealist opined: ”As I have said who the fuck allows Jews to get away with all the nefarious things you don’t like?
It’s gentiles….you dickheads. Gentiles.”
Hi SurRealist,
A few of my old & dear now married friends used to “think with their dick” and nowadays matured, they know better than to remotely describe a pussy (like you for example) as a grown up “dickhead.”
Take heart, SurRealist! For at minimum, repentant dickheads know where to “stick it,”upfront, “Missionary” style.
(Zigh). Suffer the children.
At any, especially for geokat’s attention, below is a report on Far East-based “nefarious” activity which I do not like”
Post scriptum:
As Linh Dinh has departed ZUS for Vietnam, I am hoping he could visit Indonesia’s Islamic “street” and afterward write and convey his findings at The Unz Review.
Nor do I, Chuck. For now, the Mossad can carry out these extrajudicial killings with impunity. If the Pals tried doing the same, there would be a hefty price to pay. For how long?
below is a report on Far East-based “nefarious” activity which I do not like
The proof is in the pudding
• Broken Record Dept.
You’ve mangled an aphorism in a manner known as a malapropism. But you’re not alone. I’ve seen other variations, and I was talking about this recently on another thread, where we read that “…the proof is in the putting…”
http://www.unz.com/akarlin/ww3/#comment-2293748
The proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Succinctly put, the proof of the pudding is in the eating because — for most of us — the value of a pudding is based on how it tastes, not how it looks, or the chef’s reputation, the restaurant’s reviews, the elegance and luxurious ambiance of the surroundings, or even the beautiful fonts and error-free typesetting in the menu. In the realm of food where pudding resides, the definitive question is: does it taste good, or not? By the extraordinarily clever expedient of eating the pudding, one can then determine its worth, and arrive at the proof of the pudding.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating because results are what matters, not all the claims and bragging.
There is a cult of hatred for all things Jewish here. It is true that many Jews have attributes that are less than admirable, but many of you assholes are off your meds.....insane.
For The Giraldi Family adults here @ U.R.
This is not about hatred of an ethnic group or cultural group. It is about a criminal behavior that is destroying our planet and the human spirit. The Old testament is the problem. Judaic Old testament at the top of the money heap fanatics use it as a weapon for world domination and intimidation. Many Christians easily fall in line since they have the Old testament too in their religion. Our planet is jeopardy – nuclear war is a real possibility with the endless wars for Zio’s call for world domination. The human spirit is being destroyed with Zio’s endless calls for controlled/monitored speech that muzzles us like farm animals.
Criminals tend to be silent about themselves.
Clintons, Cheney, Brennan, ilk are useful tools – Jew pets. Pets to be used when Jew can’t exercise actual power and to be face for crimes with Jew in background.
Realist,WTF
Careful but your sorry poor judgement, in ignoring these truths, reflects badly on the Jews.
I am not Jewish
WTF
I am not Jewish
It is interesting how many Jewish shills come here to assert that they are not jewish. If you dig deeper, you find that it is a disavowal of following in the Jewish faith, but not of being part of the Jewish tribe. A distinction without a difference.
The specifics of the 80% Reduction can be worked out after much back & forth, but it should be a Transparent Truly Democratic Process not dominated by Bought & Paid For Whore Politicians. But first, you, or we collectively, have to agree to an 80% Reduction. That Reduction can occur in phases and be completed after ten years.
The Pentagon is not transparent as to how many Military Installations it has established across The Planet, but the number is approximately 800 give or take a 100 to 150. I propose ALL of those Installations be Shuttered within ten years.
Special Ops will be no more. The Marines will no longer be necessary since Aggressive Interventionist War will be a thing of the past. As I mentioned, the Hierarchical Structure of the American Military will have to be entirely transformed to better meet its new Goal & Mission. It will be leaner but much more responsible, accountable and effective to its new Core Mission & Purpose — protecting The Homeland here at Home.
America’s Nuclear Arsenal will need to be reconfigured in a way that protects America from Russia & China when they scurry to fill the Power Vacuum created by this Reduction in Force. It will be made clear that if China & Russia, instead of following America’s Example they seek to exploit that Example and become Imperialist Interventionists themselves, they will be imperiling The World and risking Nuclear War. This Reduction is not a Capitulation or a Rolling Over and if China & Russia treat it as such and perceive it as Weakness, they will be sadly mistaken. America won’t be doing this merely to allow China & Russia to do in America’s Wake what America’s done all these live-long years. That’s why the Nuclear Deterrent in the face of this Reduction is vitally important, and that will require America to transform its Nuclear Arsenal into a Lean & Mean Klaatu.
We are living in a World of significantly diminishing resources. The American Military is at the forefront of gobbling up the remaining resources at an exponential pace. It’s not only a Massive Gas Hog per se, but it’s The Hammer for a System that is destroying The Planet until there is no Planet left to destroy. America could lead The World in the 21st Century by Example versus Brute Hot & Cold Evil Force, and that Example is fostering the creation of an Economic System predicated not on Growth, but Contraction, the Goal of which is to live sustainably, or as sustainable as possible, with the Living Planet.
The answer is, when you apply proven Math & Physics, that it cannot. The sooner WE ALL accept that, the better off we’ll ALL be in the years ahead.
The Conclusion from that Excellent Article linked to above.
For The Giraldi Family adults here @ U.R.
There is a cult of hatred for all things Jewish here. It is true that many Jews have attributes that are less than admirable, but many of you assholes are off your meds…..insane.
As I have said who the fuck allows Jews to get away with all the nefarious things you don’t like?
It’s gentiles….you dickheads. Gentiles vastly outnumber Jews
My o my - this "Realist" guy is going bonkers - easy boy - you are going to blow a gasket.
There is a cult of hatred for all things Jewish here. It is true that many Jews have attributes that are less than admirable, but many of you assholes are off your meds…..insane.
As I have said who the fuck allows Jews to get away with all the nefarious things you don’t like?
It’s gentiles….you dickheads. Gentiles vastly outnumber Jews
Ah but there's the rub. Five or more like ten years ago yes but today the MSM, the Jew-ish 'advocacy' groups in the West are institutionalizing anti Zionism as anti Semitic. Soon even negroes who protest against Israeli crimes against the Palestinians will be labeled anti Semites. Big brother is watching.
One does not need to be an antisemite to loath zi0cons.
“Zionism must be defeated.”
– Agree. The amoral silence by the 52 major American Jewish organizations with regard to ziocons’ criminal warmongering and Israel’s crimes puts a huge stain on the US Jewish community at large.
However — are we all Cheneys? Are we all Bush the lesser and Tony the Pious? The clueless warmonger Gavin Williamson is a pure Englishman. The subhuman Hayden and Morell are not Jewish.
Whereas Oded Yinon plan has identified the “goals” for the Middle East, it was Clinton who made possible the destruction of Lybia. The Kagans’ clan was promoting a regime change in Ukraine, but it was Brennan who provided the necessary support. The ziocons have got the power in the US thanks to the Fifth Column.
Sharpen your spear towards the real culprits, whatever their ethnicity.
The people driving the wars in Syria in particular and in selected places around the world are the Bilderbergers.
Here’s an extended discussion on their background and machinations: The Thousand Year Conspiracy: Secret Germany Behind the Mask by Paul Winkler
-
Their zombification of humanity began in Germany during its industrialization during the late Middle Ages when secularization began to grow rapidly with the influx of the Red Jews – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Jews – from Khazaria, an Eastern European Empire which was collapsing.
These Red Jews became successful moneylenders. They even lent money to the Royal Families in Europe to wage war on one another. The most powerful among the moneylenders was the House of Rothschild.
Today, the descendants of these Red Jews have a vice-like stranglehold on Western Civilization since 1913 when the United States began owing them money at the time of inception of the Federal Reserve central bank.
The House of Rothschild own Israel and wants to it to replace the United States, which today is nothing but skin and bones after institutional cannibalism via usury(no need to rub your eyes): Today the US dollar is worth only 3 cents of its original value. Not much meat left on America.
Their control over the modern world was complete when America made it illegal to own gold in 1933: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-mariotti/when-owning-gold-was-ille_b_10708196.html
Israel was created at the behest of Lionel Rothschild.
Today, the House of Rothschild is following up on their “Greater Israel” project to expand the geographical borders of Israel to include the two giant rivers, the Euphrates and Tigris.
Why? Because their pet project is facing pressure from lack of water: http://www.savethekinneret.com/http://www.savethekinneret.com/
As of 18/04/2018
-213.385
Lower Red Line
-213.18
Upper Red Line
-208.9
Black Line
-214.4
The water level in the Sea of Galilee is in the negative territory, The only freshwater resource that Israel has is drying up extremely fast.
I have no doubts, the recent allied bombings on Syria was done at the behest of Israel under the direction of Rothschild, who has invested so much into Israel and wish to see it rule the world before he dies even if it means the death of most of humanity.
Believing that people are endlessly persecuted for no reason at all is not exactly being a realist is it?
I never said that, you should know what you are commenting on before you do. It makes you look like a God damn idiot if you don’t.
Jews have plenty of faults…. one of them is not being stupid, on average .
How many Jews on Harvard’s admission’s committee? At other Ivy League schools?
Who the hell cares? My point was if admission was on strict merit Jews would be over represented. Then one of you idiots said that Jews were not over represented because of intelligence, but because of cheating, nepotism and other nefarious means.
Perhaps they are WAY over represented because of nefarious means. But my statement remains a fact.
I first made this point about a hundred comments back and since have had to explain this to a lot of fucking idiots. Before you dumb bastards jump in the middle of a series of comments do due diligence.on the subject.
The proof is in the pudding. Check out the pudding and the cooks.
If you can from your telviv cubicle or your DC neocon propaganda tank.
• Broken Record Dept.You've mangled an aphorism in a manner known as a malapropism. But you're not alone. I've seen other variations, and I was talking about this recently on another thread, where we read that "...the proof is in the putting..."
The proof is in the pudding
On Sic Semper Tyrannis, the Colonel has had unkind words to say about General Butler’s intellect.
You say this without a shred of evidence and you are not trying to be being funny! You seem about as unpleasant as a Trump in a spacesuit.
Fair enough, but tell me then, what War DOES America need? You leave the door open for more War. It appears Lang's Philosophy is to avoid War with China and/or Russia because War with either would quickly turn Nuclear. I agree with him, it would, therefore it should be a No Go.
Americans do not need this war. Israel does.
I would be all for reducing interventions and the posts designed for that purpose. But not all military aide is for military purposes. The US has one of the largest humanitarian aide programs in the world — and some of that is military.
Reducing unnecessary force and improving our footprint is not objectionable on point — but before agreeing to any such proposals — one would need specific about what 80% means and looks like.
Together with the last post, I have used physical analysis to argue that sustained economic growth in the long term is fantastical. Maybe for some, this is stating the obvious. After all, Adam Smith imagined a 200-year phase of economic growth followed by a steady state. But our mentality is currently centered on growth. Our economic systems rely on growth for investment, loans, and interest to make any sense. If we don’t deliberately put ourselves onto a steady state trajectory, we risk a complete and unchoreographed collapse of our economic institutions.
Admittedly, the argument that economic growth will stop is not as direct a result of physics as is the argument that physical growth will stop, and as such represents a stretch outside my usual comfort zone. But besides physical limits, I think we must also apply notions of common sense and human psychology. The artificial world that must be envisioned to keep economic growth alive in the face of physical limits strikes me as preposterous and untenable. It would be an existence far removed from demonstrated modes of human economic activity. Not everyone would want to participate in this whimsical society, preferring instead to spend their puffy paychecks on constrained physical goods and energy (which is now dirt cheap, by the way, so a few individuals could easily afford to own all of it!).
Recognizing the need to ultimately transition to a non-growth economy, I am personally disconcerted by the fact that we lack a tested economic system based on steady-state conditions. I would like to take a conservative, low-risk approach to the future and smartly place ourselves on a sustainable trajectory. There are well-developed steady-state economic models, pioneered by Herman Daly and others. There are even stepwise plans to transition our economy into a steady-state. But not one of those steps will be taken if people (who elect politicians) do not crave this result. The only way people will crave this result is if they understand (or experience) the impossibility of continued growth and the consequences of not acting soon enough. I hope we can collectively be smart enough to make this transition.
The US government continues showing the taxpayers’ money ($200 million, no less) on the criminal organization “White Helmets”: https://www.rt.com/usa/424717-us-pay-white-helmets-syria/
“US-Supported Syrian White Helmets Involved with War Crimes Committed by Rebel Groups:” https://disobedientmedia.com/2017/01/us-supported-syrian-white-helmets-involved-with-war-crimes-committed-by-rebel-groups/
“ISIS Is Likely Receiving Funding From People Living In Countries Allied With The US:” http://www.businessinsider.com/isis-funding-us-allies-2014-6
“ISIS: The ‘Enemy’ The US Created, Armed, & Funded:” https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-02/isis-enemy-us-created-armed-funded
“White Helmets Campaign for War NOT Peace:” http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/10/02/the-white-helmets-campaign-for-war-not-peace-rla-and-nobel-peace-prize-nomination-should-be-retracted/
“The White Helmets have been proven to be no more than a support network for Al Nusra Front and associated extremist terrorist groups. In many documented instances, the White Helmets have been accused of carrying out criminal acts alongside the US-coalition armed and funded terrorist factions.”
— Anything goes for Eretz Israel.
Could you stay on point? — We have got that you are a Spotless Angelic Creature and a Messenger of The Truth.
http://grizzom.blogspot.ca/2018/04/guns-and-butter-with-bonnie-faulkner_19.html
Saker interview is excellent breakdown of current situation between Russia and the USA.
Only main negative is Saker not confront Putin over collusion with Netanyahu who attacks
SAA ,IRGC, Shia Militias with little to no response by Putin
One does not need to be an antisemite to loath zi0cons.
Ah but there’s the rub. Five or more like ten years ago yes but today the MSM, the Jew-ish ‘advocacy’ groups in the West are institutionalizing anti Zionism as anti Semitic. Soon even negroes who protest against Israeli crimes against the Palestinians will be labeled anti Semites. Big brother is watching.
Of course it doesn’t affect the likes of some but others will be intimidated into silence, which it has unfortunately already done.
Zionism must be defeated.
Americans do not need this war. Israel does.
Fair enough, but tell me then, what War DOES America need? You leave the door open for more War. It appears Lang’s Philosophy is to avoid War with China and/or Russia because War with either would quickly turn Nuclear. I agree with him, it would, therefore it should be a No Go.
Considering that, since China & Russia are the only Legitimate Foes who can stand up to the American War Machine, any other War would be Pure Unadulterated Bullying. Beating up on Weak Opponents. War for War’s Sake knowing you can never really lose and yet you never really win.
We see from this that War is now an Arcane Notion. It no longer has any place. Nukes have rendered Real War irrelevant and impossible.
And yet, Donald Trump recently increased America’s War Budget to $716 billion and is reconfiguring America’s Nuclear Arsenal so that the possibility of using Nukes in Combat becomes more probable. Trump’s American War Budget, if he’s still in office and gets a second term, which is dubious, will approach $1 trillion by 2020 to 2021.
How do we as a Nation justify this if we claim we’re not a Nation that craves and thrives on War?
I propose we reduce our Military/War Footprint 80% over the next ten years. I propose that the American Military be entirely reconfigured from top to bottom and that its sole and only purpose is to protect The Homeland from attack. In otherwords, I propose closing all American Military Bases around The World and putting an end, once and for all, to American Imperialism and Foreign Interventionism.
What say you annamaria? What say you Lang? Are you with me, or are you still in search of a Non-Zionist Inspired Real War which we now know is impossible. The only Real War that’s possible now is a Nuclear War, or Armageddon if you will.
The term “neoconservative” is used as a euphemism for “jews”, according to Jonah Goldberg.
He should know since Jew are the ones who invented the word and use the word to hide who they really are and why they take the positions they do.
And let’s not forget the committees that hire new faculty…
Thanks for sharing, Chuck. I wasn't aware of Bugliosi or his book The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder.
... I provide a You Tube video that features an Italian-American HERO, Vince Bugliosi, who attempted to prosecute PreZident G.W. Bush for murder.
Manning records that both Bush and Blair were uptight that the WMDs were not going to be found, for this totally undermined their public rationale for the invasion. So George W offered another fabrication to give them an excuse to attack. He suggested that the U.S. would paint one of our own surveillance planes in the colors of the United Nations and fly it over Iraq, hoping that Saddam would be provoked into shooting it down. If so, the U.S. and Brits could invade, claiming that they were retaliating for Saddam’s attack on the UN.
https://hightowerlowdown.org/podcast/the-manning-memo/
geokat generously offered:
“Here’s an interesting tidbit that most people were probably unaware of that was revealed in the Manning Memo:”
Hi geokat,
To reiterate a point I made on several occasions, you are the U.R. comment department’s # 1 Intelligence Research Specialist.
Regarding your quoted words above, I am concerned that some participants here will be at first confused that the referenced “Brit” Manning is Bradley (Chelsea) Manning.
At any rate, I am glad for having “whetted your appetite” to learn about the deliberately obscured work of the principled, inspiring & daring work of Vincent Bugliosi.
The wiles of PreZident W. Bush’s little mind are on vivid display in his freshman-level suggestion — offered to compromised Tony Blair — to paint a ZUS airplane with U.N. insignias and tempt Saddam Hussein into shooting the craft down, start the satanic “Shock & Awe,” hokey liberation of Iraq.
Lastly, I couple Mr. Giraldi’s article (questionnaire) title “Whose war?” with Jim Hightower’s profound insight, George W. Bush’s “war of lies,” including of course his immoral war launched against Taliban, Autumn 2001.
Thanks, geo. And blessings upon Vincent Bugliosi!
You can agree or not agree with with my postulations, but my expertise is irrelevant. The material I present is what is relevant. Weigh it on its merits, instead of weighing me on my merits. I’m just the Message In A Bottle.
Stalin had no experience or expertise in War and yet he’s largely responsible for the defeat of Nazi Germany in WWII. Using your logic, we can conclude Stalin, because he had no expertise in War and because he had murdered and exiled most everyone in Russia who did, should have lost the War. The Nazis were at Moscow’s Doorstep and Stalin was all set to flee the Russian Capital to a Spider Hole in the Countryside when at the last minute, or second actually, he decided to remain and tough it out. He had NO EXPERTISE. But he did have Gut Instinct, Organic Street Smarts and incredible Resolve. Just ask Putin, he’ll tell you. Stalin truly was The Man of Steel, yet he was an expert at NOTHING. Thank goodness The Soviet Union wasn’t inundated with your vaunted Experts or else Stalin would have been instructed to flee to the Countryside with his tail between his legs and we’d all be speaking and typing German right now and The Jews would have been eliminated entirely. In that respect, The Jews should worship Stalin more than they do Oscar Schindler. In the end, it was Stalin who saved their asses, not the recalcitrant FDR who had to be brought kicking & screaming into War against Germany.
Anyway, Lang completely overlooks Vietnam in his Narrative. How are The NeoCons and/or The Zionists responsible for Vietnam? For Korea? For Afghanistan? What about Libya? Was that The Zionists‘ idea too? I agree that AIPAC should be outlawed as all Special Interests and all Lobbying should be outlawed, but The Zionists cannot be blamed for everything just as The NeoCons cannot and I agree with the other Commentators who say that NeoCon for many is shorthand for Zionist.
Lang can’t point fingers at The Neocons and use the examples throughout American History he’s provided and not also point the finger at himself for his emphatic involvement in Vietnam unless he’s willing to seek Redemption for his Crimes Against Humanity and properly atone as Smedley Butler did and call War out for what it really is, a Racket and a Blood Sacrifice to Moloch because sometimes that’s the only explanation of War that fits.
There’s a hell of a lot of History he skipped between the Spanish-American War in 1898 and the War referred to euphemistically as Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003. Like, say, The Vietnam War. It’s History, isn’t it? It was about Manifest Destiny, wasn’t it? It was Imperialism, wasn’t it? Oh wait, sorry, The Vietnam War was allegedly about The Truman Doctrine, wasn’t it? Silly me. There is a difference, you know. Semantics mean everything, at least when you’re Splitting Hairs. What they both have in common, Manifest Destiny and The Truman Doctrine, is that they are both Imperialism. The Truman Doctrine feigned to be saving Indigenous Cultures from Communist Cultural Decimation but what it really was doing was saving Indigenous Cultures from Communist Cultural Decimation so that said Indigenous Cultures could ultimately be transformed into Capitalist Cultural Enclaves replete with Capitalist Consumer Culture. Nuance matters, even if the Goal is still the same.
Of course, in America’s effort to pick up where the Colonial French left off and preserve French Culture in Vietnam with an American Twist, 3 to 5 million Vietnamese were senselessly murdered. Had America minded its own business and kept to itself, those millions of Vietnamese who were senselessly murdered would have lived a full life and another 10 million or so would never have been injured and traumatized. Pat Lang did some of that murdering, injuring & traumatizing. The extent of what he did we’ll never know, but considering he was Special Ops, it’s a Good Bet it was Merciless & Gruesome. In otherwords, Atrocious.
No he didn't - he had a nervous breakdown.
The Nazis were at Moscow’s Doorstep and Stalin was all set to flee the Russian Capital to a Spider Hole in the Countryside when at the last minute, or second actually, he decided to remain and tough it out.
http://www.historyinanhour.com/2011/07/01/stalins-breakdown/
Either way, after three days, a small delegation came knocking at his door. Headed by Molotov (pictured to Stalin’s right), Lavrentii Beria(Stalin’s Chief of Secret Police), Kliment Voroshilov (Defence, to Stalin’s left) and Anastas Mikoyan (Foreign Trade), they found Stalin sitting at his desk. He had on his face a look of fear. Mikoyan later wrote, “I have no doubt – he decided we had come to arrest him.” Stalin was looking thinner, haggard and hadn’t changed his clothes.
“Why have you come?” he asked.
Molotov stepped forward, “We’re asking you to return to work.”
The anti-American activity by American Enterprise Institute: “Two and a half cheers for the Syria strike:” https://www.aei.org/publication/two-and-a-half-cheers-for-the-syria-strike/
The author, certain Dalibor Rohac, is an armchair general (zero military experience), who strives for Kagans’ laurels. He needs to be sent to the frontline — please, with his family, to learn about risks of a war. The scoundrel writes, “Of course, the intervention is not without its risks. One blemish is the existing divisions among European countries and even within the EU institutions.” — yes, this is what constitutes “risk” for the criminal warmonger.
Dalibor Rohac knows who pays for his drivel and he tries hard to not disappoint his ziocon masters: “Another even more pressing problem is that the strikes on Friday do not go anywhere near changing the balance of power on the ground — and much less toward imposing sizable costs on the Iranian and Russian regimes who are effectively controlling the situation. Without a more aggressive posture particularly against Russia — involving additional sanctions against regime officials and oligarchs, asset freezes, and cutting Russian state-owned and state-connected banks from the global financial system — Vladimir Putin has little reason to seriously rethink his complicity in Mr. Assad’s war crimes.”
He is an open liar — there is nothing “alleged” in his lying in our times of availability of factual information, specifically the US/UK complicity in the crimes of White Helmets in Syria.
The presstituting Dalibor Rohac must be put in a position to experience the results of imposing the sizable costs on and more aggressive posture particularly against Russia. Rohac is an arsonist that needs to be constrained — tarred and feathered would be a good first step.
Americans do not need this war. Israel does.
Fair enough, but tell me then, what War DOES America need? You leave the door open for more War. It appears Lang's Philosophy is to avoid War with China and/or Russia because War with either would quickly turn Nuclear. I agree with him, it would, therefore it should be a No Go.
Americans do not need this war. Israel does.
And how honorable are you by hiding behind the name of von Borcke? Are you a perfect being?
Patrick Lang does not need your approval or disapproval. He is above it.
When you write, “He actively participated in the birth of Eretz Israel and the destruction of Christianity,” this is not even laughable — this is a mechanical slander by an ignoramus. Do you know when Israel was established? Do you know Lang’s age?
He is a real person. He grew up and matured in various respects, including his understanding of American reality. You are not in a position to criticize his integrity and expertise and guts: Remember, you are hiding behind the von Borcke’s name.
Again, are you an angelic being? Do you have the same hatred for Smedley Darlington Butler, the most decorated American general in the US history? Butler “participated in military actions in the Philippines, China, in Central America and the Caribbean…” — Read about him, “Heron.” Butler was a person of tremendous courage, a true American patriot.
It would not be surprising to learn that you work for hasbara which cannot forgive Lang’s opposition — the intelligent and articulated opposition, not some hysterical exclamations — to wars for Israel and to zionizaton of the US army and Congress.
Wrong, in a strictly merit based entrance process Jews would be over-represented.
Ashkenazi Jews are often very bright people, I’m not questioning that. But their massive over-representation at Harvard, for instance, is not due to SAT scores, but nepotism and corruption.
How many Jews on Harvard’s admission’s committee? At other Ivy League schools?
Who the hell cares? My point was if admission was on strict merit Jews would be over represented. Then one of you idiots said that Jews were not over represented because of intelligence, but because of cheating, nepotism and other nefarious means.
How many Jews on Harvard’s admission’s committee? At other Ivy League schools?
I can say with certainty that I am not a war criminal or his pet chihuahua bitch.
From Lang’s Wiki:
“During the Vietnam War, he served in the Special Forces and Military Intelligence.”
So he clearly volunteered to serve the ZOG USA in their SS and Gestapo equivalents during numerous aggressive wars started by the US on behalf of the same Neocon’s he claims to despise. We know Tonkin was a false flag. We know about operation Phoenix, Pentagon papers, secret bombing of Laos and Cambodia, Agent Orange. Lang carries culpability for all of it, at least in terms of the principles of Nuremburg. He should be treated the same way his beloved army treated captured SS officers in May, 1945.
“From 1992 to 1994, all the U.S. military attachés worldwide reported to him. During that period, he also briefed President George H. W. Bush at the White House, as he had during Operation Desert Storm”
He actively participated in the birth of Eretz Israel and the destruction of Christianity and genocide of Christians across the Middle East. Wow, this war criminal is one tough act to follow. I think we should all thank him for his service and for protecting “our freedom”.
As far as his blog goes, I gave up commenting there long ago because of his fickle and mean spirited moderating. Any time he starts losing an argument he gets nasty or blocks the commenter. His treatment of Bernhard from MoA over the years, who he often bullies and accuses of being an America hater, has been despicable.
Lang is clearly not a defender of free speech.
So what does he stand for? He writes books about Yankees, that is what I think he is. Just another Yankee war criminal willing to murder for his jewish owners.
BTW, Heros is short for Heros von Borcke. You should read up about him because von Borke, unlike Lang, was an honorable gentleman.