The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Andrei Martyanov Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eamonn Fingleton Eric Margolis Fred Reed Godfree Roberts Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire John Pilger Jonathan Revusky Kevin MacDonald Linh Dinh Michael Hoffman Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Nathan Cofnas Norman Finkelstein Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Philip Weiss Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Stephen J. Sniegoski The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Glenn Greenwald Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman Jim Daniel Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Reid John Stauber John Taylor John V. Walsh John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Juan Cole Judith Coburn K.R. Bolton Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kelley Vlahos Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Barrett Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Murray Polner Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Noam Chomsky Nomi Prins Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Razib Khan Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Steve Fraser Steven Yates Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 Academia AIPAC Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Blacks Britain China Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Deep State Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran ISIS Islam Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Middle East Neocons Political Correctness Race/IQ Race/Ethnicity Republicans Russia Science Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 1971 War 2008 Election 2012 Election 2014 Election 23andMe 70th Anniversary Parade 75-0-25 Or Something A Farewell To Alms A. J. West A Troublesome Inheritance Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abdelhamid Abaaoud Abe Abe Foxman Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghraib Abu Zubaydah Academy Awards Acheivement Gap Acid Attacks Adam Schiff Addiction Adoptees Adoption Adoption Twins ADRA2b AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Agriculture Aha AIDS Ain't Nobody Got Time For That. Ainu Aircraft Carriers AirSea Battle Al Jazeera Al-Qaeda Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Alberto Del Rosario Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Hamilton Alexandre Skirda Alexis De Tocqueville Algeria All Human Behavioral Traits Are Heritable All Traits Are Heritable Alpha Centauri Alpha Males Alt Left Altruism Amazon.com America The Beautiful American Atheists American Debt American Exceptionalism American Flag American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Prisons American Renaissance Americana Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Chua Amygdala An Hbd Liberal Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Androids Angela Stent Angelina Jolie Anglo-Saxons Ann Coulter Anne Buchanan Anne Heche Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Antibiotics Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Antonin Scalia Antonio Trillanes IV Anywhere But Here Apartheid Appalachia Appalachians Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Arctic Humans Arctic Resources Argentina Argentina Default Armenians Army-McCarthy Hearings Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Artificial Intelligence As-Safir Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Ashraf Ghani Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlantic Council Attractiveness Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Austro-Hungarian Empire Austronesians Autism Automation Avi Tuschman Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Babri Masjid Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby Girl Jay Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Bad Science Bahrain Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banking Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack H. Obama Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Bariatric Surgery Baseball Bashar Al-Assad Baumeister BDA BDS Movement Beauty Beauty Standards Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Behaviorism Beijing Belgrade Embassy Bombing Believeing In Observational Studies Is Nuts Ben Cardin Ben Carson Benghazi Benjamin Cardin Berlin Wall Bernard Henri-Levy Bernard Lewis Bernie Madoff Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders Beta Males BICOM Big Five Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Clinton Bill Kristol Bill Maher Billionaires Billy Graham Birds Of A Feather Birth Order Birth Rate Bisexuality Bisexuals BJP Black Americans Black Crime Black History Black Lives Matter Black Metal Black Muslims Black Panthers Black Women Attractiveness Blackface Blade Runner Blogging Blond Hair Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology Boderlanders Boeing Boers Boiling Off Boko Haram Bolshevik Revolution Books Border Reivers Borderlander Borderlanders Boris Johnson Bosnia Boston Bomb Boston Marathon Bombing Bowe Bergdahl Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Breaking Down The Bullshit Breeder's Equation Bret Stephens Brexit Brian Boutwell Brian Resnick BRICs Brighter Brains Brighton Broken Hill Brown Eyes Bruce Jenner Bruce Lahn brussels Bryan Caplan BS Bundy Family Burakumin Burma Bush Administration C-section Cagots Caitlyn Jenner California Cambodia Cameron Russell Campaign Finance Campaign For Liberty Campus Rape Canada Canada Day Canadian Flag Canadians Cancer Candida Albicans Cannabis Capital Punishment Capitalism Captain Chicken Cardiovascular Disease Care Package Carl Sagan Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Carry Me Back To Ole Virginny Carter Page Castes Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Causation Cavaliers CCTV Censorship Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlie Rose Charlottesville Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Child Abuse Child Labor Children Chimerism China/America China Stock Market Meltdown China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese Exclusion Act Chlamydia Chris Gown Chris Rock Chris Stringer Christian Fundamentalism Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilian Deaths CJIA Clannishness Clans Clark-unz Selection Classical Economics Classical History Claude-Lévi-Strauss Climate Climate Change Clinton Global Initiative Cliodynamics Cloudburst Flight Clovis Cochran And Harpending Coefficient Of Relationship Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cohorts Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Colombia Colonialism Colonists Coming Apart Comments Communism Confederacy Confederate Flag Conflict Of Interest Congress Consanguinity Conscientiousness Consequences Conservatism Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Cornel West Corporal Punishment Correlation Is Still Not Causation Corruption Corruption Perception Index Costa Concordia Cousin Marriage Cover Story CPEC Craniometry CRIF Crime Crimea Criminality Crowded Crowding Cruise Missiles Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckold Envy Cuckservative Cultural Evolution Cultural Marxism Cut The Sh*t Guys DACA Dads Vs Cads Daily Mail Dalai Lama Dallas Shooting Dalliard Dalton Trumbo Damascus Bombing Dan Freedman Dana Milbank Daniel Callahan Danish Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Dark Tetrad Dark Triad Darwinism Data Posts David Brooks David Friedman David Frum David Goldenberg David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Katz David Kramer David Lane David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Declaration Of Universal Human Rights Deep Sleep Deep South Democracy Democratic Party Democrats Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Depression Deprivation Deregulation Derek Harvey Desired Family Size Detroit Development Developmental Noise Developmental Stability Diabetes Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dialects Dick Cheney Die Nibelungen Dienekes Diet Different Peoples Is Different Dinesh D'Souza Dirty Bomb Discrimination Discrimination Paradigm Disney Dissent Diversity Dixie Django Unchained Do You Really Want To Know? Doing My Part Doll Tests Dollar Domestic Terrorism Dominique Strauss-Kahn Dopamine Douglas MacArthur Dr James Thompson Drd4 Dreams From My Father Dresden Drew Barrymore Dreyfus Affair Drinking Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drugs Dry Counties DSM Dunning-kruger Effect Dusk In Autumn Dustin Hoffman Duterte Dylan Roof Dylann Roof Dysgenic E.O. 9066 E. O. Wilson Eagleman East Asia East Asians Eastern Europe Eastern Europeans Ebola Economic Development Economic Sanctions Economy Ed Miller Education Edward Price Edward Snowden EEA Egypt Eisenhower El Salvador Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Ellen Walker Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmanuel Todd Empathy England English Civil War Enhanced Interrogations Enoch Powell Entrepreneurship Environment Environmental Estrogens Environmentalism Erdogan Eric Cantor Espionage Estrogen Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenic Eugenics Eurasia Europe European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Everything Evil Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Extraversion Extreterrestrials Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Faces Facts Fake News fallout Family Studies Far West Farmers Farming Fascism Fat Head Fat Shaming Father Absence FBI Federal Reserve Female Deference Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Fetish Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Fifty Shades Of Grey Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Financial Sector Financial Times Finland First Amendment First Law First World War FISA Fitness Flags Flight From White Fluctuating Asymmetry Flynn Effect Food Football For Profit Schools Foreign Service Fourth Of July Fracking Fragrances France Francesco Schettino Frank Salter Frankfurt School Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Fred Hiatt Fred Reed Freddie Gray Frederic Hof Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Navigation Freedom Of Speech French Canadians French National Front French Paradox Friendly & Conventional Front National Frost-harpending Selection Fulford Funny G G Spot Gaddafi Gallipoli Game Gardnerella Vaginalis Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla Gcta Gender Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Confusion Gender Equality Gender Identity Disorder Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Gene-environment Correlation General Intelligence General Social Survey General Theory Of The West Genes Genes: They Matter Bitches Genetic Diversity Genetic Divides Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George Patton George Romero George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush George Wallace Germ Theory German Catholics Germans Germany Get It Right Get Real Ghouta Gilgit Baltistan Gina Haspel Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization God Delusion Goetsu Going Too Far Gold Gold Warriors Goldman Sachs Good Advice Google Gordon Gallup Goths Government Debt Government Incompetence Government Spending Government Surveillance Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Recession Greater Appalachia Greece Greeks Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory B Christainsen Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory House GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection Grumpy Cat GSS Guangzhou Guantanamo Guardian Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Gynephilia Gypsies H-1B H Bomb H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Hamas Hamilton: An American Musical Hamilton's Rule Happiness Happy Turkey Day ... Unless You're The Turkey Harriet Tubman Harry Jaffa Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara Hassidim Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatemi Havelock Ellis Haymarket Affair Hbd Hbd Chick HBD Denial Hbd Fallout Hbd Readers Head Size Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Heart Of Asia Conference Heartiste Heather Norton Height Helmuth Nyborg Hemoglobin Henri De Man Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Herbert John Fleure Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah High Iq Fertility Hip Hop Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanic Paradox Hispanics Historical Genetics Hitler HKND Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homo Altaiensis Homophobia Homosexuality Honesty-humility House Intelligence Committee House M.d. House Md House Of Cards Housing Huey Long Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Nature Human Rights Human Varieties Humor Hungary Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Hurricane Harvey I.F. Stone I Kissed A Girl And I Liked It I Love Italians I.Q. Genomics Ian Deary Ibd Ibo Ice T Iceland I'd Like To Think It's Obvious I Know What I'm Talking About Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ignorance Ilana Mercer Illegal Immigration IMF immigrants Immigration Imperial Presidency Imperialism Imran Awan In The Electric Mist Inbreeding Income Independence Day India Indians Individualism Inequality Infection Theory Infidelity Intelligence Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Marriage Inuit Ioannidis Ioannis Metaxas Iosif Lazaridis Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iran Sanctions Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish ISIS. Terrorism Islamic Jihad Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying Italianthro Italy It's Determinism - Genetics Is Just A Part It's Not Nature And Nurture Ivanka Ivy League Iwo Eleru J. Edgar Hoover Jack Keane Jake Tapper JAM-GC Jamaica James Clapper James Comey James Fanell James Mattis James Wooley Jamie Foxx Jane Harman Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Japanese Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA Jayman Jr. Jayman's Wife Jeff Bezos Jennifer Rubin Jensen Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesse Bering Jesuits Jewish History JFK Assassination Jill Stein Jim Crow Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Boehner John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hoffecker John Kasich John Kerry John Ladue John McCain John McLaughlin John McWhorter John Mearsheimer John Tooby Joke Posts Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Pollard Joseph Lieberman Joseph McCarthy Judaism Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jute K.d. Lang Kagans Kanazawa Kashmir Katibat Al-Battar Al-Libi Katy Perry Kay Hymowitz Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kennewick Man Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson KGL-9268 Khazars Kim Jong Un Kimberly Noble Kin Altruism Kin Selection Kink Kinship Kissing Kiwis Kkk Knesset Know-nothings Korea Korean War Kosovo Ku Klux Klan Kurds Kurt Campbell Labor Day Lactose Lady Gaga Language Larkana Conspiracy Larry Summers Larung Gar Las Vegas Massacre Latin America Latinos Latitude Latvia Law Law Of War Manual Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lead Poisoning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Left Coast Left/Right Lenin Leo Strauss Lesbians LGBT Liberal Creationism Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya life-expectancy Life In Space Life Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happyness Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Literacy Litvinenko Lloyd Blankfein Locus Of Control Logan's Run Lombok Strait Long Ass Posts Longevity Look AHEAD Looting Lorde Love Love Dolls Lover Boys Low-carb Low-fat Low Wages LRSO Lutherans Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. MacArthur Awards Machiavellianism Madeleine Albright Mahmoud Abbas Maine Malacca Strait Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mamasapano Mangan Manor Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao-a Mao Zedong Maoism Maori Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Marijuana Marine Le Pen Mark Carney Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Martin Luther King Marwan Marwan Barghouti Marxism Mary White Ovington Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Mate Value Math Mathematics Maulana Bhashani Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Brooks Mayans McCain/POW Mearsheimer-Walt Measurement Error Mega-Aggressions Mega-anlysis Megan Fox Megyn Kelly Melanin Memorial Day Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Mesolithic Meta-analysis Meth Mexican-American War Mexico Michael Anton Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lewis Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Weiss Michael Woodley Michele Bachmann Michelle Bachmann Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microcephalin Microsoft Middle Ages Mideastwire Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarized Police Military Military Pay Military Spending Milner Group Mindanao Minimum Wage Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Minorities Minstrels Mirror Neurons Miscellaneous Misdreavus Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Modern Humans Mohammed Bin Salman Moldova Monogamy Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormons Moro Mortality Mossad Mountains Movies Moxie Mrs. Jayman MTDNA Muammar Gaddafi Multiculturalism Multiregional Model Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mutual Assured Destruction My Lai My Old Kentucky Home Myanmar Mysticism Nagasaki Nancy Segal Narendra Modi Nascar National Debt National Differences National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Yard Shooting Naz Shah Nazi Nazis Nazism Nbc News Nbc Nightly News Neanderthals NED Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Netherlands Neuropolitics Neuroticism Never Forget The Genetic Confound New Addition New Atheists New Cold War New England Patriots New France New French New Netherland New Qing History New Rules New Silk Road New World Order New York City New York Times Newfoundland Newt Gingrich NFL Nicaragua Canal Nicholas Sarkozy Nicholas Wade Nigeria Nightly News Nikki Haley No Free Will Nobel Prize Nobel Prized Nobosuke Kishi Nordics North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Null Result Nurture Nurture Assumption Nutrition Nuts NYPD O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Obamacare Obesity Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Occupy Wall Street Oceania Oil Oil Industry Old Folks At Home Olfaction Oliver Stone Olympics Omega Males Ominous Signs Once You Go Black Open To Experience Openness To Experience Operational Sex Ratio Opiates Opioids Orban Organ Transplants Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Osama Bin Laden Ottoman Empire Our Political Nature Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Oxtr Oxytocin Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Palatability Paleoamerindians Paleocons Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palestinians Pamela Geller Panama Canal Panama Papers Parasite Parasite Burden Parasite Manipulation Parent-child Interactions Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Paris Spring Parsi Paternal Investment Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Krugman Paul Lepage Paul Manafort Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Peace Index Peak Jobs Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Peers Peggy Seagrave Pennsylvania Pentagon Perception Management Personality Peru Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philip Breedlove Philippines Physical Anthropology Pierre Van Den Berghe Pieter Van Ostaeyen Piigs Pioneer Hypothesis Pioneers PISA Pizzagate Planets Planned Parenthood Pledge Of Allegiance Pleiotropy Pol Pot Poland Police State Police Training Politics Poll Results Polls Polygenic Score Polygyny Pope Francis Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Pornography Portugal Post 199 Post 201 Post 99 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Post-Nationalism Pot Poverty PRC Prenatal Hormones Prescription Drugs Press Censorship Pretty Graphs Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Project Plowshares Propaganda Prostitution Protestantism Proud To Be Black Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Schools Puerto Rico Punishment Puritans Putin Pwc Qatar Quakers Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quebecois Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race Riots Rachel Dolezal Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racism Radical Islam Ralph And Coop Ralph Nader Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Raqqa Rating People Rationality Raul Pedrozo Razib Khan Reaction Time Reading Real Estate Real Women Really Stop The Armchair Psychoanalysis Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reciprocal Altruism Reconstruction Red Hair Red State Blue State Red States Blue States Refugee Crisis Regional Differences Regional Populations Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rena Wing Renewable Energy Rentier Reprint Reproductive Strategy Republican Jesus Republican Party Responsibility Reuel Gerecht Reverend Moon Revolution Of 1905 Revolutions Rex Tillerson Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Pryor Richard Pryor Live On The Sunset Strip Richard Russell Rick Perry Rickets Rikishi Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Putnam Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robocop Robots Roe Vs. Wade Roger Ailes Rohingya Roman Empire Rome Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rooshv Rosemary Hopcroft Ross Douthat Ross Perot Rotherham Roy Moore RT International Rupert Murdoch Rural Liberals Rushton Russell Kirk Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Elections 2018 Russian Hack Russian History Russian Military Russian Orthodox Church Ruth Benedict Saakashvili Sam Harris Same Sex Attraction Same-sex Marriage Same-sex Parents Samoans Samuel George Morton San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandusky Sandy Hook Sarah Palin Sarin Gas Satoshi Kanazawa saudi Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Scandinavians Scarborough Shoal Schizophrenia Science: It Works Bitches Scientism Scotch-irish Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seduced By Food Semai Senate Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Serenity Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sex Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sex Tape Sex Work Sexism Sexual Antagonistic Selection Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Fluidity Sexual Identity Sexual Maturation Sexual Orientation Sexual Selection Sexually Transmitted Diseases Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Stock Exchange Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shinzo Abe Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Shyness Siamak Namazi Sibel Edmonds Siberia Silicon Valley Simon Baron Cohen Singapore Single Men Single Motherhood Single Mothers Single Women Sisyphean Six Day War SJWs Skin Bleaching Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavoj Zizek Slavs SLC24A5 Sleep Slobodan Milosevic Smart Fraction Smell Smoking Snow Snyderman Social Constructs Social Justice Warriors Socialism Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Somalia Sometimes You Don't Like The Answer South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea South Sudan Southern Italians Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet Union Space Space Space Program Space Race Spain Spanish Paradox Speech SPLC Sports Sputnik News Squid Ink Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stalinism Stanislas Dehaene Star Trek State Department State Formation States Rights Statins Steny Hoyer Stephan Guyenet Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Hadley Stephen Jay Gould Sterling Seagrave Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Mnuchin Steven Pinker Still Not Free Buddy Stolen Generations Strategic Affairs Ministry Stroke Belt Student Loans Stuxnet SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Subsistence Living Suffrage Sugar Suicide Summing It All Up Supernatural Support Me Support The Jayman Supreme Court Supression Surveillance Susan Glasser Susan Rice Sweden Swiss Switzerland Syed Farook Syrian Refugees Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Tale Of Two Maps Taliban Tamerlan Tsarnaev TAS2R16 Tashfeen Malik Taste Tastiness Tatars Tatu Vanhanen Tawang Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxes Tea Party Team Performance Technology Ted Cruz Tell Me About You Tell The Truth Terman Terman's Termites Terroris Terrorists Tesla Testosterone Thailand The 10000 Year Explosion The Bible The Breeder's Equation The Confederacy The Dark Knight The Dark Triad The Death Penalty The Deep South The Devil Is In The Details The Dustbowl The Economist The Far West The Future The Great Plains The Great Wall The Left The Left Coast The New York Times The Pursuit Of Happyness The Rock The Saker The Son Also Rises The South The Walking Dead The Washington Post The Wide Environment The World Theodore Roosevelt Theresa May Things Going Sour Third World Thomas Aquinas Thomas Friedman Thomas Perez Thomas Sowell Thomas Talhelm Thorstein Veblen Thurgood Marshall Tibet Tidewater Tiger Mom Time Preference Timmons Title IX Tobin Tax Tom Cotton Tom Naughton Tone It Down Guys Seriously Tony Blair Torture Toxoplasma Gondii TPP Traffic Traffic Fatalities Tragedy Trans-Species Polymorphism Transgender Transgenderism Transsexuals Treasury Tropical Humans Trump Trust TTIP Tuition Tulsi Gabbard Turkheimer TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twins Raised Apart Twintuition Twitter Two Party System UKIP Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United States Universalism University Admissions Upper Paleolithic Urban Riots Ursula Gauthier Uruguay US Blacks USS Liberty Utopian Uttar Pradesh UV Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vassopressin Vdare Veep Venezuela Veterans Administration Victor Canfield Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Violence Vioxx Virginia Visa Waivers Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Voronezh Vote Fraud Vouchers Vwfa W.E.I.R.D. W.E.I.R.D.O. Wahhabis Wall Street Walter Bodmer Wang Jing War On Christmas War On Terror Washington Post WasPage Watergate Watsoning We Are What We Are We Don't Know All The Environmental Causes Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Media Western Religion Westerns What Can You Do What's The Cause Where They're At Where's The Fallout White America White Americans White Conservative Males White Death White Helmets White Nationalist Nuttiness White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Wife Why We Believe Hbd Wikileaks Wild Life Wilhelm Furtwangler William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Graham Sumner William McGougall WINEP Winston Churchill Women In The Workplace Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Workers Working Class Working Memory World Values Survey World War I World War Z Writing WTO X Little Miss JayLady Xhosa Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yankeedom Yankees Yazidis Yemen Yes I Am A Brother Yes I Am Liberal - But That Kind Of Liberal Yochi Dreazen You Can't Handle The Truth You Don't Know Shit Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zhang Yimou Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies Zones Of Thought Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments / On "Foreign Policy"
 All Comments / On "Foreign Policy"
    The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Rurik

    war – but then, sum up by blaming it on “The Joos.”
     
    exactly!

    if anything, the "Joos" are trying to stop all these wars!

    who came out strongest against the wars on Iraq, and then Libya and then Syria, if not the ((NYT))?!

    who has condemned the recent bombing of Syria, (over obvious lies about chemical attacks) if not Sheldon Adelson and bb Netanyahu!

    I mean come on, right?

    AIPAC has little to no influence in DC, but still that plucky little voice has been adamant that all of these wars are illegal, misguided and wrong.

    The Kagan 'cabal' (as some anti-Semites refer to them) have been demanding investigations into the contrived putsch (Yatz is our guy') in Ukraine, and all the lies about MH17!

    The entire Jewish media, from CNN to all the rest have been exposing the lies about these wars like no other! Look how they railed at Clinton for her role in Libya!

    But these tiresome anti-Semites will always look for an excuse for their own failures and failings, and it's not like we haven't seen this kind of scapegoat blaming before! When you're having difficulties, there's the temptation to always find some group to blame and spread blood libels, just as a certain mustached demagogue from history showed us all how it's done.

    It reminds me of those terrorists in Israel that never lose an opportunity to try to blame "The Joos" for all of their problems, so they attack Israel (on Passover!), and threaten to push her into the sea, demanding Hitlerian calls for genocide, like "The right of Return"!

    They may as well be building gas chambers and ovens with talk like that, and what does the world do?!

    they act all crybaby because a few terrorists got shot. Well what does these modern day Adolf Hitlers think the Jews are going to do when they demand The Right of Return / genocide?

    The Jews suffered the world to walk into those "showers" in the last century. You'll please forgive them if they prefer to say Never Again' this time around.

    From Palestinian terrorists, to neo-white supremacists like Ron Paul and PCR, pooh-poohing these wars, there's always someone looking for a group to blame for their own mediocrity and incompetence.

    You forgot that we goyim are all motivated by jealousy, too! ;)

    Ya wanna hear something utterly depressing? I was talking to a young lady who’s been working on some degree in nursing and she said that they were required to take an “ethics” class. Guess what the big issue was? Yup, “The” Holycaust!!!!

    Cheezus, the holycaust fanatics are everywhere. I mean everywhere and the layers of irony are piled on thick. You can bet your sore emerods that they weren’t discussing the “ethics” of making stuff like that up and brainwashing people with it 75 years after it was supposed to have occurred.

    The holocaust conspiracy theorists just never give up. They are obsessed; nutzo! Good grief.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The current series of railroad strikes in France are portrayed in the media as “labor unrest”, a conflict between the government and trade union leaders, or as a temporary nuisance to travelers caused by the self-interest of a privileged category of workers. In Anglo-American media, there is the usual self-satisfied tongue-clicking over “those cheese-eaters, always...
  • @peterAUS
    Pointless.

    People as Ms. Johnston should be thinking about the paradigm.

    In the current, this is what has been happening, is happening, and will be happening.
    That's the nature of it.

    Thinking about meaning of life, nature of work, (re)distribution of goods and services and such is the only way to make any difference.

    Otherwise, most of us will be serfs for the top 20 %, "managed" and, if necessary, "retired".

    That's the most likely future, actually.
    The mixture of new Ancient Egypt and Huxley's "New World Order". No slaves and order maintained, mostly, with a gloved hand.

    Working class has been fucked over and nobody was paying attention. On the contrary, the rest liked it.
    Now they are coming for the middle class, with gusto.

    Pleasant dreams.

    There’s blame to go around.
    The post-war history of American labor is of a movement with one strategy and double-down, double-down, double-down, ’till it went broke.
    There are two strategies labor needed to take and bears responsibility for failing at: 1) at about the time when it should have accepted that American laborers were getting a pretty good deal that could only be improved in the short-term by consuming the host, it should have shifted resources to bargain for the long-haul by moving for a German-style public corporate, corporate/labor model, namely where labor had a seat on the board, 2) rather than tunnel-vision resistance to free trade up to and until it simply lost in a total wash-out, it should have looked for alternative models to global trade, one of which has been on display : the British Commonwealth of Nations.
    If in 1975 American labor threw its strength behind those two long-term goals we would have a much different world today – one with much more prosperity, better distributed, and with less identity politics.
    On the right, well: the right seemed absolutely convinced that it could kill its opposition and nothing would replace it.
    You can of course kill your loyal opposition for the incremental pennies on the dollar back that its worth to you – but usually when you kill the loyal opposition its replaced by the disloyal opposition.

    When I go to places where American working class are still found – they still love America. Can’t say that for the left we have, which is the left that we have the Republican right to thank for.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Keep your eye on ebay, theres one for 1974 George Washington Carver Jr High School Yearbook – Los Angeles CA for $24.99

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/1974-George-Washington-Carver-Jr-High-School-Yearbook-Original-Los-Angeles-CA/152521876258?hash=item2383032322:g:YVIAAOSw3ZRY~MFm

    One for 1961 George Washington High School San Francisco, California for $50

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/Surveyor-1961-George-Washington-High-School-Yearbook-San-Francisco-Califor/131464439669?hash=item1e9be42775:m:mWuqyPNz8sy5i6JMIUD00VQ

    Not the one your’re looking for, but sooner or later I’m sure one will pop up, I’ve seen several over the years at garage sales and estate sales going all the way back to the 50′s. I’ll try and look out for one when I’m on Ebay.

    Even if you did have the book, there would still be the crowd doubting you. Pretty much everyone I’ve ever talked to knows the official story is a lie.

    Anyone with a brain can watch the videos and tell the buildings were blown up with demolition charges. The plane or no plane thing is just something to distract from that. I personally don’t think planes hit the Pentagon or crashed into the farm in Penn.

    It really doesn’t matter until we get some people in charge of America that aren’t corrupt traitors, that actually care about the country, not just about the money or their political career, they have all the info. right now as we speak. They could release it tomorrow if they wanted. The fact that they haven’t tells me that who did it is still in charge of things, and we all know who is pulling the strings in DC. They openly brag about it routinely.

    The energy beam weapon theories, no planes theories are put out there to poison the well, so the MSM can get on TV and say something like:
    “The conspiracy theorist nutjobs believe 9/11 was an inside job and used Star Wars death star beams to blow up the WTC!”
    This makes the whole thing look stupid to the brainwashed zombies, they put theories like these out there just for this purpose..
    David Icke thinks Elites are lizard people, so he is clearly put out there to make people who doubt the official story look like loons too.
    Same with the flat earth crowd, obviously.
    James Corbett, Christopher Bollyn seem ok from what I’ve seen.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Am I alone in thinking that the on-line version may well be a true rendition of the original hard copy yearbook, and that the multi-layer confusion surrounding her appearance therein is one of the features that made the “Betty Ong” persona attractive to anyone who needed to create an identity?

    That, after all is exactly what identity creators do. They scour birth/death records, school yearbooks, etc looking for a person who was really born, but who’s official life history goes murky/disappears, thus creating a tabula rasa on which to paint the new identity’s life history.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @anonymous
    looks the same, graduated at the same time, cannot be identified as a different person

    My thoughts exactly. She look very similar to me, although I will freely admit that my judgment in this regard may be off. Maybe it wasn't even a typo. Maybe it was entered in the yearbook that way for some very trivial, as of yet unknown reason. Maybe the different spelling is actually a conspiracy in itself. I don't know what the answer is, and I don't know that anyone has ever even looked into it.

    I just find it amazing that other commenters here are suggesting that the idea that her name may have been spelled slightly differently in some old yearbook (for whatever reason) is ludicrous, crazy, outlandish nonsense that is completely outside the realm of possibility, while the simpler and more likely conclusion is that she never really existed, and is in reality part of a huge, highly elaborate, multilayered conspiracy involving dozens, possibly hundreds of people. All of the people in on the conspiracy are perfectly fine with being complicit in the murder of thousands of innocent Americans for unexplained reasons. Not a single one of these people ever comes forward. Ever.

    Maybe it was entered in the yearbook that way for some very trivial, as of yet unknown reason.

    That’s a stretch, given that both Betty Ng and Betty Ong are in the yearbook and that the yearbook’s names would have been transcribed from the school’s official student roll.

    Did the student roll contain two names for one person?
    If it did:
    Are there two transcripts? Are they the same, or different?
    Did they participate in the same, or different extracurricular clubs, associations, etc?
    Did that person get 2 graduation diplomas?

    IOW, if Betty Ng is, in fact Betty Ong then things can get weird very quickly.

    As for:

    She look very similar to me, although I will freely admit that my judgment in this regard may be off.

    … the latter half of the statement would appear to be much closer to the mark than the former. FWIW, I’ve been living in Asia for a decade, and to my eye they’re not even close. 8 or 9 years ago, I probably would’ve agreed with you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @utu
    Sorry I engaged you. I forgot you are an idiot after all.

    It takes an idiot, like you, to recognize another fucking idiot, like sean.

    Both of you are also pathetic liars and trolls.

    Read More
    • Agree: Jonathan Revusky
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @SolontoCroesus

    The New England Puritans frowned on violence as a way of resolving social conflicts.
     
    ha

    Ask Hester Prynne.

    Puritans had a keen sense of psychological violence.
    It's still violence.
    The mouthpieces of god who mandated that violence still operated on the proposition, "Damn it, I am in charge."

    Interesting that quote is what stood out to me as well. The Puritans could be some sadistic SOBs by what I understand of their history. Their treatment of their fellow “Christians” including Quakers was a bit creative and not exactly gentle.

    Here’s someone commenting on their furious nuttiness.:

    The Puritans are almost always portrayed as a peaceful and persecuted bunch, but they were a very revolutionary, seditious, and violent people.:

    England was plunged into an environment of Puritan blood rage and unreasonable fundamentalism. In the words of Hume, “fanaticism had its own language, it was a new jargon invented by the fury and hypocrisy of the times.” The Puritans wanted “No king, no nobility,” and like every leftists or progressive, the Puritans wanted “universal equality.” To use the words of Hume, “it was, in short, necessary to fanaticize the people with notions of perfect equality, to assure the obedience of the masses, and gradually to form a coalition against the monarchy.”

    http://shoebat.com/2014/11/03/puritans-just-violent-muslims/

    Another source wrote this. (Sorry no link)

    The Puritans wanted to be free to establish a “Christian” theocracy. (A perverted one complete with Indian extermination, communist principles, a police state…)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @redmudhooch
    Oops, forgot the video, Watch this video at 4:20, 5:40, 6:40
    Those are explosions, below the falling top, even the reporters agree!

    https://youtu.be/qhyu-fZ2nRA

    Regrettably, I have fallen into the habit of referring to the explosions as collapses even though I’ve known almost from the beginning that explosives caused the buildings to be destroyed. I shall take greater care to no longer do so.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    I would encourage you not to despise the good will of citizens, even when it is irritating. I appreciate your service. I honor your sacrifice in Vietnam and millions of S. Vietnamese respect what you and your fellows did on their behalf. We generally assume that you served honorably, if not that is a matter for you to rest with your conscience.


    I want to encourage you to embrace whatever blessings citizens can and are willing to bestow -- even if in the main said bequeathed is obtuse and annoying. No one wants to insult vets, well few anymore and no one can immediately heal the wounds of an ungrateful and vastly misinformed citizenry on the issue of Vietnam. But I like to encourage you to let them try and embrace it the same -----


    excuse or not my well intentioned comments. I tell me father repeatedly, "Appreciate your service" he too served in Vietnam and elsewhere.


    so great a sacrifice none can repay . . .

    What does it mean to “serve honorably” in an unjust war of aggression? The only “honorable” action is to refuse orders.

    I know, I know….You are incapable of seeing Vietnam as anything but an honorable endeavor from the charitable US govt. lol.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @lack of meaning
    I had the chance to speak with many american veterans of the Vietnam war in the 70`s . There was the draft ot the time .

    Many of them came back very sick , abuse of alcohol , drugs , postraumatic stress disorder , they committed genocides against civilians , they felt guilty , they " fragged " , they were demoralized , they felt their country had betrayed them ...

    Many of them told me that the worse was that after a time in Vietnam they did nor see the meaning of the war , some of them told me : well if those f.... gooks want to be communists , let them be communists , I do not understand them , who am I or my country to tell them what to do , after all if communism is a shitty system let them eat shit , and at the end if it is a good system we will copy them , but what the hell are we doing there ....

    The war of Vietnam was a big defeat fot the USA in the peak of its power at the hands ot a little
    backwarded country , a military defeat , a moral defeat , a human defeat , an economical defeat ( except for the vultures who got rich with the war )

    If Bacevich ( nice Russian name tovarich , privet ) defends the draft , or the arab wars , he has not learned anything fron the Vietnam war , and I am affraid from none of the arab wars , habibi .

    SHAME ON YOU…”lack of meaning”
    YOU and your ilk are responsible for perpetuating the “Vietnam Veteran” stereotype in which YOU paint all of us with a very broad brush. For your information, almost ALL of us Vietnam veterans came back with sound minds to an ungrateful country and quietly resumed our lives without incident or fanfare. The promised government jobs that were mandated into law for returning Vietnam veterans never materialized. YOU are of the same ilk as traitor “Hanoi” Jane Fonda who gave “aid and comfort” to the enemy while our POWS were (and are) still in captivity. Very few returning Vietnam veterans had problems…the stereotype that YOU claim…is totally false.
    I notice that you have swallowed the standard “loss of Vietnam” lies hook line and sinker. Americans and South Vietnamese prevailed in every battle…bar none. In fact, TET 1968 was a decisive victory for the South s the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces were decimated. Of course, the American “mainstream media” claimed it was a victory for the communists.
    For your information, the American Vietnam war was not a “civil-war” but was an INVASION by the North Vietnamese, who wanted control of the whole country. The INVASION was allowed to continue when American troops left and South Vietnamese troops were not resupplied.
    YOU must have watched the Ken Burns’ “schlockumentary” on Vietnam, in which he built up the North Vietnamese while exacting harsh criticism (lies) on the American and South Vietnamese troops. Of course, to his credit, Burns “let it slip” that the “re-education camps” contrary to communist claims (actually prisons) would be in operation for approximately six months after the war was over–it turns out that many former South Vietnamese were “detained” for as long as twenty years.
    Post-war Vietnam was so wonderful, tens of thousands of “boat people risked life and limb to escape that “communist paradise” [silence].

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[674] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Mallory

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.
     
    In other words "To take their stuff". Why else have a "puppet regime"?

    The purposes of America’s fake wars are not complex. Its the desire of adolescents to be war heroes, ie the American version of the medieval saint, plus a lot of cowboy excitement from shooting off lots of guns and missiles. Add in the vast amounts of money and prestige the military engenders in adolescent or pubescent American society, and you end up with a gigantic bureaucracy desperate with the need for war, and the ability to create as many wars as it wants via its ownership of the media and political system. What happens to the invaded and regime changed victim country is largely irrelevant, as by that time the American war machine, grossly obese like everything else in America, has moved on to its next theater of excitement and thrills.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Y. V. says:

    I don’t know about you, but I worry more about the implications of China’s rise and Russian misbehavior than I do about Islamic terrorism.

    ”China has thoroughly studied the Western technique of getting out of crises via controllable armed conflicts and wars. It has written its own script for squeezing the United States off the world stage. The Western script becomes an episode in a larger game.”

    Contents of the script:

    - while remaining inactive and all but invisible, China retains and replenishes its resources;

    - China supports actions of the West aimed at mutually assured destruction of Russia and the Muslim world;

    - China supports bilateral conflicts in line with the Western script;

    - China becomes ideologically active and active in the military sense when the moment is ripe;

    - when the conflicts are over, China moves into the new territories…

    The global conclusion is simple. This is the first time strategic interests of the West, Russia, Israel, and the Muslim world coincide. We can only survive together.

    [MORE]

    Under the unfolding script, all of us are victims. China has already won, strategically and tactically.

    The test is plain – we will sink or swim together. The new global Chinese order will follow the rules the Americans drew up for themselves. What counts is that the “golden billion” of the world’s population alone will prosper; the remaining 4 billion are expendable. Unlike the United States, to say nothing of the Russians or Jews, China has this billion already. All of us are expendable in this wicked colonial system of distribution of resources.

    Proposals:

    1. All efforts, including from the elite of international finance, should be made to stop the war.

    2. Russia should become the real leader of the new process. (It has already become it but not yet aware of the fact.) The West and Israel need a strategic alliance with the Muslim world more than anything else, and this alliance is possible only through Russia. Only Russia in an alliance with the Muslim world can keep China in check without conflicts, helping it find its new place in the world as another super-power.

    3. Leaders of Russia, America, Israel, Europe, Iran, India, and international financial capitals must initiate a dialogue over leaving this crisis behind and preventing events like those which swept America on September 11.

    A time of change is upon us, and it’s futile to wish we were living in some other era. We have to change ourselves and change the world.”

    THE WESTERN SCRIPT

    Using techniques of manipulating public opinion, the West is trying to establish the illusion of a global forces with the fascist- like ideology of Wahhabi fundamentalism. As far as the West is concerned, Wahhabi and Islam are the same thing. It is because of this that the essential terrorism of Wahhabi ideas is being formulated so simply for public consumption: all Muslims are terrorists by nature.

    The preliminary objective of brainwashing (Islam is the basis of terrorism) is thus achieved. Therefore, the terrorist world of Islam should be maneuvered into fighting Russia. Russia and the Muslim world will destroy each other, and the West will gain access to the natural resources on their territories. The dollar pyramid will straighten once again, and the economic crisis will be over. Life goes on.

    Apart from the need to shock the international community with atrocities of Islamic terrorists, this script requires the presence of some country fundamental for this particular global force. It should answer the following requirements: a large Muslim population, government based on military dictatorship (which allows prompt replacement of the leader); borders with Russia, China, and India; nuclear arsenals; and a well-trained army with combat experience. Pakistan is an ideal fit, and Afghanistan is just a capsule.

    Continuation of the script after the terrorist attacks in the United States: retaliatory strikes at Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, and so on, depending on the situation. A dramatic rise in anti-American sentiments throughout the Muslim world as a result. A coup in Pakistan, leading to the rise of a radical Wahhabi leader there. Unification of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

    A Taliban invasion of Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan will follow. Conflicts with Iran and Iraq will follow. The second phase of preferable armed conflicts is as follows: Iran and Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Turkey and Greece, Georgia and Abkhazia, China and Taiwan, North Korea and South Korea, Israel and Palestine, and escalation of the situation in Chechnya. Russia will inevitably find itself dragged into some war or other, and declare general mobilization. Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, and some other ethnic republics will refuse to go to war under those circumstances. The rest of the population of Russia will also object. All this may result in a drastic destabilization in Russia, and a loss of control. Things may even reach extremes, ending in a military coup or disintegration of the Russian Federation.

    However, some details indicate that this particular script has bogged down. The world is different now. In the past, it was sufficient to torch the Reichstag or assassinate a prince; but now, even the horrors of September 11 no longer suffice.

    That is why some sort of “fuel” is needed to give the script momentum – terrorist attacks on the scale of September 11, but not in America alone. Over there, in Europe, and in Russia as well. Anthrax is just a prelude. Controllable terrorism, however, has its own limits. Russia knows, for example, that “Chechen terrorists” will no longer suffice. After all, linking them to Islam is fairly difficult.

    But even that is not the key point. Certain indirect aspects indicate that the script considered here is not the only one. Most probably, it is not even the whole script, just part of an even larger one. In accordance with the latter, Russia and the Muslim world fighting each other are not the only objectives. The West and Israel are too. It follows that some unknown Contractor and Player must be present somewhere. This script becomes possible when we assume that some Western elites and secret services made a kind of covert pact with this still-unknown Player.”

    #14
    Novaya Gazeta
    No. 75
    October 2001
    THE THIRD FORCE OF WORLD WAR III (excerpts, emphasis added)

    http://www.russialist.org/archives/5497-14.php

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @SteveM

    Frankly, the development of the Polish political system towards a totalitarian repressive regime doesn’t surprise me in the least.
     
    The Poles are no more "totalitarian" and "repressive" than the Russians. They have an open society with free elections. They are nationalists fully aware of their history with Moscow. Painting the Poles as crypto-fascists is insulting and condescending. Floating that kind of bile only aggravates the relationship between the two countries/cultures.

    I'm not saying that the Poles' interpretation of current Russian foreign policy is accurate. But it's up to the Poles and Russians to collectively work that out over time.

    The MASSIVE impediment to a productive and peaceful rapprochement between Poland and Russia is the Global Cop Gorilla in Washington that loves to stir the pot of conflict for its own ego's sake.

    P.S. I'm thinking the catalyst for improved relations between Poland and Russia would be visible exchanges between the Polish Catholic Primate and the Russian Orthodox Patriarch. Being brothers in Christ in what is largely a Post-Christian Europe should transcend political boundaries.

    Painting the Poles as crypto-fascists is insulting and condescending.

    Don’t say.

    Being brothers in Christ in what is largely a Post-Christian Europe should transcend political boundaries.

    Whoah…..
    Orthodox and Catholic, together, in Eastern Europe.
    Stunned.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Cold N. Holefield
    Chuck Orloski,

    There's no doubt J.R. is highly intelligent and incredibly thorough & comprehensive. I like how he even corrected my hyperbole to Keep it Honest. I respect that.

    I guess I was a bit taken aback because it appeared he was taking me the wrong way. I respect the work he's done on this and his thinking on this. I wasn't trying to attack him or impugn him in any way.

    Terrific literary “screen name” pun, Cold N. Holefield! Thanks!
     
    Thank you. Catcher In The Rye is an excellent book, and the fact that various Freaks like Mark David Chapman and John Hinckley were so drawn to it has always intrigued me. As well, the messaging in that book is Spot On. Everyone, or most everyone, is a Phoney. Or, It's All Lies.

    Sweet dreams are made of this
    Who am I to disagree?
    I travel the world and the seven seas
    Everybody's looking for something

    Some of them want to use you
    Some of them want to get used by you
    Some of them want to abuse you
    Some of them want to be abused
     

    Cold N. Holefield wrote reflectively:
    “There’s no doubt J.R. is highly intelligent and incredibly thorough & comprehensive. I like how he even corrected my hyperbole to Keep it Honest. I respect that.”

    Hi “Catcher,”

    I like the way you think and how you exhibit signs of having “thick skin” with some people’s lack thereof.

    Strong minds & personalities, it’s too bad Jon & Ron are currently reacting as acid & base on this very “unspeakable” 9/11 matter. *

    Thanks, Cold N. Holefield!

    *The late-Thomas Merton wrote about President JFK’s absolute need for having “thick skin,” due to ruthless pressures being brought to bear by what the Trappist monk deigned as “UNSPEAKABLE” (domestic) warmongering forces.

    P.S.:
    I like the song-lyric you featured but for the life of me, my foot tapped, but I can’t recall the title name & original artist. At first, I considered Dylan’s “The Mighty Quinn (the Eskimo).”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Seamus Day

    I have more than you have, a man who lived in NYC and saw it happen.
     
    A friend of my mom’s who lives in Arlington, VA, called right after the news from the WTC was breaking, and smoke was coming from what the news thought was from the Capitol, and she was crying and told my mom that see just saw a plane fly into the Pentagon. I was there when my mom took the call.

    No plane hit the Pentagon, unless you believe in The Incredible Shrinking Plane, one that leaves a much smaller hole than its actual size when it crashes.

    “They shall find it difficult, they who have taken authority as truth rather than truth as authority.”

    Gerald Massey.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Rick Johnson
    As a Vietnam War vet, I detest the right-wing virtual signaling of people saying to me and others: "Thank you for your service."

    How do they know what kind of service I rendered? Was it honorable or dishonorable? Did I perform my duties or just drink booze and chase the native women? Most of us serving did a little bit of all of the foregoing.

    But methinks the Col. doesn't understand Trump and his followers. The worldwide transition of values and forces will hasten immanent events that will rock the post-war foundations is ongoing, but not elevated up to the public consciousness yet. Stay tuned. April showers bring May flowers.

    April showers bring May flowers.

    If April showers bring May flowers, what do May flowers bring?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Jonathan Revusky

    the lazy bum Revusky
     
    Utu, you pathetic dumbass... by your logic, if you took your car to a mechanic specifically for an oil change, and he did just that, changed the oil, he would be a "lazy bum" because he did not take the opportunity to rebuild your car's engine!

    The wager with Unz was specifically about whether Betty Ong was in the appropriate high school yearbook. To say that I'm lazy because I resolved that question and didn't go further makes no sense really.

    Now, granted, as the scriptures say, out of the mouths of dumbasses can come words of wisdom, so you do make a valid point about hiring a private investigator. Assuming one really did want to resolve the Betty Ong question thoroughly, I guess that is what one would do -- as opposed to insisting that I, somebody who is not any sort of professional investigator, do it.

    So, yes, I would be perfectly happy if Ron hired a PI to do just that. However, he really ought to pay off on this wager to me first.

    Have you considered putting a classified ad in a local paper or a listing on Craig’s List in the Bay Area offering a reward for a hard copy of the yearbook? I would think that $500 would flush one out, assuming one still exists.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    I am an unashamed advocate of the draft to ameliorate the primary dynamic in question.

    I am an unashamed advocate of the draft to ameliorate the primary dynamic in question.

    The best way to “ameliorate the primary dynamic in question” is to mandate that the arrogant DC nitwits read the foreign policy sections of George Washington’s Farewell Address first thing every day. Have C-SPAN televise the reading every day that Congress is in session.

    Then maybe those militarist clowns will eventually put 2 and 2 together without the need to draft American citizens into militarized slavery.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Sean
    According to Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying In International Politics by John J. Mearsheimer (Oxford University Press) Lying isn't necessary, useful or even possible most of the time.
    A False Flag 9/11 would require total mastery of US government, intelligence security, police, and most crucially the army, which could always stage a coup. It just isn't that easy to be make a selfish penguin conspiracy work. A nation state is not as sophisticated as a bunch on penguins.

    I apologize for my earlier comment where I thought we were in agreement.
    Oxford University? They couldn’t POSSIBLY be in on it, could they?? THEM, INSIDERS??
    And that was quite a gem,
    ‘A nation state is not as sophisticated as a bunch of penguins.’
    I’m beginning to think you are indeed yourself a penguin, and good for you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Dr. X

    What Happens When a Few Volunteer and the Rest Just Watch?
     
    ...the volunteers become mercenaries for Israel.

    If Jews direct our military forces for their nefarious ends these Jews must be incompetent halfwits. How did making Iraq an Iranian client benefit Israel? Did the Libyan failure benefit Israel? Is the Syrian/Russian/Iranian state a boon to Israel? Maybe Israel should try something else.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ronald Thomas West

    "Thucydides’s famed .. “The strong do what they will, while the weak suffer what they must.”"
     
    Well, colonel, in case of Thucydides, I'd go with “Their judgment was based more upon blind wishing than upon any sound pre-vision; for it is a habit of mankind to entrust to careless hope what they long for, and to use sovereign reason to thrust aside what they do not fancy” pointing to human nature hasn't changed one bit, bringing up the more apropos:

    “The extension of the empire has meant the growth of private fortunes. This is nothing new, indeed it is in keeping with the most ancient history” -Gaius Asinius Gallus (from Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome)

    Meanwhile, under the terms of our military system, attention to how this money actually gets spent by our yet-to-be-audited Pentagon tends to be — to put the matter politely — spotty
     
    Just come out and say "Criminal." Or, look at whose books THE PENTAGON is auditing:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/30/usaid-in-central-africa/

    The legal profession exists to implement the rule of law. We hope that the result is some approximation of justice
     
    Colonel, we haven't had a constitution & rule of law since the National Security Act of 1947. What we have is called "color of law." You might wish to study up on that:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/12/01/the-oath-and-the-trash-bin/

    I don’t know about you, but I worry more about the implications of China’s rise and Russian misbehavior than I do about Islamic terrorism. And I worry more about changing weather patterns here in New England or somebody shutting down the electrical grid in my home town than I do about what Beijing and Moscow may be cooking up
     
    That's just oymoronish stupid (typo?) because it's our military and intelligence agencies combined behavior, inclusive of radicalizing Islam and setting it loose in Western China and Russia's Caucus, is no small reason for those rising giants looking at us like we're rabid dogs. BTW if you're really worried about the grid going down, well, you might have a look at EMP:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/10/14/devolution-part-1/

    As for:

    "The generals who followed one another in presiding over that war are undoubtedly estimable, well-intentioned men..."
     
    The colonel is just flat out wrong; and I don't give a rat's a** if I was a mere sergeant and Bacevich was a colonel, because I went on to work in the trenches investigating corruption and the colonel went to the la-la-land of the ivory tower. Here's the real score:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/05/26/counterfeit-coin/

    All in all, the colonel's article is a fail.

    Colonel Bacevich is only playing the devil’s advocate, and, in a diplomatic manner, showing the contradictions between the “official” military agenda and the reality of today’s world.

    If the US was ruled with the interests of its people and servicemen in mind, it would not be engaged in endless and unwinnable wars. But the NeoCons imperial elite don’t care, as they don’t have skin in the game, unlike the military (Colonel Bacevich lost his only son in Iraq).

    The fate of an Empire is demise, because it is ruled by the few, who don’t care about reality, until this reality engulfs them.
    Patriots try to stop such demise by the modest , realistic means available to them: enlightening people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anonymous

    I picked up somewhere that Betty Ong went to George Washington High on 32nd Avenue
     
    Perhaps someone decided after the fact to connect Betty Ong with the WRONG high school as a diversionary psyop, and created "supporting" material to keep this diversion afloat as long as possible.

    Since a considerable number of people actually died on 9/11, it is not clear why someone would have to invent a FICTITIOUS individual to hang the phone dialogues on.

    The fiction has to be contrived prior to the actual event taking place so that media can all parrot the same lines and how the BBC came to report the collapse of WTC7 prior to its actual collapse. This is also why media announces the names and pictures of the so called perpetrators long before any real investigation has commenced and, more importantly, to derail any inconvenient facts that might emerge prior to the entire media being corralled.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In March 2003, Pat Buchanan wrote a groundbreaking article entitled "Whose War?" in opposition to the Bush Administration fueled growing hysteria over Saddam Hussein’s alleged weapons of mass destruction which was producing demands for an armed intervention to disarm him. Buchanan rightly identified a number of prominent Jewish officials and journalists closely tied to the...
  • @tac
    Right on Rurik ....

    I am not sure if you'd seen the latest hit jobs by the Guardian and BBC on prominent social media/twitter voices who challenge the official narratives, but here it is in this thread (follow the subsequent comments as well:

    http://www.unz.com/article/tracing-the-rush-to-war/#comment-2296924

    thanks tac,

    we live in Abusurdistan

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @SolontoCroesus
    you really should have put a warning atop that photo.

    mea culpa sir

    mea culpa

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Bill Jones
    The Official Version of 9/11 goes something like this…

    Directed by a beardy-guy from a cave in Afghanistan, ( This well appointed Suite http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/nether_fictoid3.htm according to the London Times): nineteen hard-drinking, coke-snorting, devout Muslims enjoy lap dances before their mission to meet Allah…

    Using nothing more than craft knifes, they overpower cabin crew, passengers and pilots on four planes…

    And hangover or not, they manage to give the world’s most sophisticated air defense system the slip…

    Unfazed by leaving their “How to Fly a Passenger Jet” guide in the car at the airport, they master the controls in no-time and score direct hits on two towers, causing THREE to collapse completely…

    Our masterminds even manage to overpower the odd law of physics or two… and the world watches in awe as steel-framed buildings fall symmetrically – through their own mass – at free-fall speed, for the first time in history.

    Despite all their dastardly cunning, they stupidly give their identity away by using explosion-proof passports, which survive the fireball undamaged and fall to the ground… only to be discovered by the incredible crime-fighting sleuths at the FBI…

    …Meanwhile down in Washington…

    Hani Hanjour, having previously flunked 2-man Cessna flying school, gets carried away with all the success of the day and suddenly finds incredible abilities behind the controls of a Boeing…

    Instead of flying straight down into the large roof area of the Pentagon, he decides to show off a little…

    Executing an incredible 270 degree downward spiral, he levels off to hit the low facade of the world’s most heavily defended building…

    …all without a single shot being fired…. or ruining the nicely mowed lawn… and all at a speed just too fast to capture on video…

    …Later, in the skies above Pennsylvania…

    So desperate to talk to loved ones before their death, some passengers use sheer willpower to connect mobile calls that otherwise would not be possible until several years later…

    And following a heroic attempt by some to retake control of Flight 93, it crashes into a Shankesville field leaving no trace of engines, fuselage or occupants… except for the standard issue Muslim terrorists bandana…

    …Further south in Florida…

    President Bush, our brave Commander-in-Chief continues to read “My Pet Goat” to a class full of primary school children… shrugging off the obvious possibility that his life could be in imminent danger…

    …In New York…

    World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein blesses his own foresight in insuring the buildings against terrorist attack only six weeks previously…

    While back in Washington, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz shake their heads in disbelief at their own luck in getting the ‘New Pearl Harbor’ catalyzing event they so desired to pursue their agenda of world domination…

    And finally, not to be disturbed too much by reports of their own deaths, at least seven of our nineteen suicide hijackers turn up alive and kicking in mainstream media reports…

    And If you don’t believe this, you are a conspiracy theorist.

    You reminded me of the 5 min video by James Corbett:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • @Vojkan
    Israel can exist without the USA. Nukes are a pretty good life insurance. How it would fare without US taxpayers' money is another matter. You should bear in mind though that Jews rule the banks, the media, the entertainment, the justice, and the education in the whole Western world, not only in the US.

    Nukes aren’t defensive weapons and couldn’t be used to stop an invasion. Israel could be invaded and taken down much more quickly than any of its neighbors. Only having a defender like the US has allowed Israel to survive this long.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Rick Johnson
    As a Vietnam War vet, I detest the right-wing virtual signaling of people saying to me and others: "Thank you for your service."

    How do they know what kind of service I rendered? Was it honorable or dishonorable? Did I perform my duties or just drink booze and chase the native women? Most of us serving did a little bit of all of the foregoing.

    But methinks the Col. doesn't understand Trump and his followers. The worldwide transition of values and forces will hasten immanent events that will rock the post-war foundations is ongoing, but not elevated up to the public consciousness yet. Stay tuned. April showers bring May flowers.

    I would encourage you not to despise the good will of citizens, even when it is irritating. I appreciate your service. I honor your sacrifice in Vietnam and millions of S. Vietnamese respect what you and your fellows did on their behalf. We generally assume that you served honorably, if not that is a matter for you to rest with your conscience.

    I want to encourage you to embrace whatever blessings citizens can and are willing to bestow — even if in the main said bequeathed is obtuse and annoying. No one wants to insult vets, well few anymore and no one can immediately heal the wounds of an ungrateful and vastly misinformed citizenry on the issue of Vietnam. But I like to encourage you to let them try and embrace it the same —–

    excuse or not my well intentioned comments. I tell me father repeatedly, “Appreciate your service” he too served in Vietnam and elsewhere.

    so great a sacrifice none can repay . . .

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Scalpel
    What does it mean to "serve honorably" in an unjust war of aggression? The only "honorable" action is to refuse orders.

    I know, I know....You are incapable of seeing Vietnam as anything but an honorable endeavor from the charitable US govt. lol.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The current series of railroad strikes in France are portrayed in the media as “labor unrest”, a conflict between the government and trade union leaders, or as a temporary nuisance to travelers caused by the self-interest of a privileged category of workers. In Anglo-American media, there is the usual self-satisfied tongue-clicking over “those cheese-eaters, always...
  • I hope that French society has a sense of solidarity and won’t be taken apart by Schadenfreude like American society where worsening of somebody’s social position like that of unionized workers is always cheered by the rest of society. However in American rich are excluded form this treatment. They are always admired and everybody wishes them to become richer and richer.

    Somebody did a job on Americans and the suckers do not have a clue.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Sean
    I don't know anything "FOR SURE" and neither do you. No one in this world does because no one may have absolute verification of data, no matter how loudly and persistently they call for it. It is not empirically verifiable that a Brotherhood of the Bell type organisation (Skull and Bones according to Anthony P. Sutton ) does not deliberately create enemies such as Hitler and Stalin all the better to forment war and control America. Nor is it "for sure" that anyone died in 9/11, which may have been staged by the cia chief two presidents and a senator Bonesmen Bush clan, maybe the victims were not 100% veritably real people because 9/11 never actually happened.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gulf_War_Did_Not_Take_Place

    The essays in Libération and The Guardian were published before, during and after the Gulf War and they were titled accordingly: during the American military and rhetorical buildup as "The Gulf War Will not take Place"; during military action as "The Gulf War is not Taking Place", and after action was over, "The Gulf War Did Not Take Place".
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality#Simulacrum
    In his work Simulacra and Simulation, Baudrillard argues the "imaginary world" of Disneyland magnetizes people inside and has been presented as "imaginary" to make people believe that all its surroundings are "real". But he believes that the Los Angeles area is not real; thus it is hyperreal. Disneyland is a set of apparatuses which tries to bring imagination and fiction to what is called "real". This concerns the American values and way of life in a sense and "concealing the fact that the real is no longer real, and thus of saving the reality principle."[19]

    "The Disneyland imaginary is neither true or false: it is a deterrence machine set up in order to rejuvenate in reverse the fiction of the real. Whence the debility, the infantile degeneration of this imaginary. It's meant to be an infantile world, in order to make us believe that the adults are elsewhere, in the "real" world, and to conceal the fact that real childishness is everywhere, particularly among those adults who go there to act the child in order to foster illusions of their real childishness."
     

     
    Its possible at the centre of the huddle of south pole Emperor penguins is always the same bunch of free riders, and a secret organisation running the USA stays in power whatever happens.

    ‘Its possible at the centre of the huddle of south pole Emperor penguins is always the same bunch of free riders, and a secret organisation running the USA stays in power whatever happens.’

    We seem to be in agreement. And though I certainly don’t claim to be absolutely sure, the latter part of the above statement can only conceivably be absolutely true–all evidence in daily life confirms it, if one pays attention, as certainly do the farcicle elections every year or so, as does common sense when you ask yourself, Do I have ANY political power, any whatsoever? What about my state? Or town for that matter? How can we all possibly be ever in lock step with master’s agenda, shit and puked out 24/7 right into our brains?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @EugeneGur
    Thanks for the information. I was wondering what happened to Dr. Pisorski after he was arrested more than a years ago, I think, on ridiculous charges of spying for Russia, and I believe China (!) was also mentioned. As ridiculous as it gets.

    Frankly, the development of the Polish political system towards a totalitarian repressive regime doesn't surprise me in the least. A rabidly nationalistic stance with extreme hostility towards any deviation from the official viewpoint in the interpretation of the historic or political events was to lead to repressions - this was inevitable.

    Frankly, the development of the Polish political system towards a totalitarian repressive regime doesn’t surprise me in the least.

    The Poles are no more “totalitarian” and “repressive” than the Russians. They have an open society with free elections. They are nationalists fully aware of their history with Moscow. Painting the Poles as crypto-fascists is insulting and condescending. Floating that kind of bile only aggravates the relationship between the two countries/cultures.

    I’m not saying that the Poles’ interpretation of current Russian foreign policy is accurate. But it’s up to the Poles and Russians to collectively work that out over time.

    The MASSIVE impediment to a productive and peaceful rapprochement between Poland and Russia is the Global Cop Gorilla in Washington that loves to stir the pot of conflict for its own ego’s sake.

    P.S. I’m thinking the catalyst for improved relations between Poland and Russia would be visible exchanges between the Polish Catholic Primate and the Russian Orthodox Patriarch. Being brothers in Christ in what is largely a Post-Christian Europe should transcend political boundaries.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    Painting the Poles as crypto-fascists is insulting and condescending.
     
    Don't say.

    Being brothers in Christ in what is largely a Post-Christian Europe should transcend political boundaries.
     
    Whoah.....
    Orthodox and Catholic, together, in Eastern Europe.
    Stunned.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Fran Macadam
    A conservative Scottish pastor at a Baptist Church I visited, credibly summed up the purpose of war, more accurately than Augustine:

    "The purpose of war is to take what belongs to someone else."

    Laughing . . . I get it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon

    No.
    “War is the continuation of politics by other means.”
     
    You and the author simplify a bit; here is some context; you can find more context if you care.

    As, then, there may be life without pain, while there cannot be pain without some kind of life, so there may be peace without war, but there cannot be war without some kind of peace, because war supposes the existence of some natures to wage it, and these natures cannot exist without peace of one kind or other.
     
    I've noticed you absent from Revusky's last thread; probably a wise decision on your part. But your input would be interesting if you have any (no need to read the piece in its entirety or more than the first few comments).

    Nice.
    Agree, of course.
    Didn’t want to go that path on this site. Tried a couple of times and, let’s say that the level of misunderstanding was staggering.
    Getting phylosophical, or even deep into human very makeup, well, this isn’t the place.

    …because war supposes the existence of some natures to wage it, and these natures cannot exist without peace of one kind or other.

    I’ll say just one thing.
    I had my own war. Apparently, it was really a very bad one, by everybody’s account.
    I just know one thing: I never felt so alive then and there. Nothing compares. Nothing……
    All elements of life itself were on the level I’ve never felt after that. The scent of air, intensity of sounds, taste of food and drinks, sleep, rest, comradeship, well…everything was 100 %. Nothing in civilian life compares. Nothing. Well, one thing only, actually.Won’t say what.
    Crazy a?
    Or….hehe…..poor civilians, “chattering class” in particular.

    If we want to get analytical now, the same applies to groups. A couple of mates, together, in war. A small community…larger community…..etc….etc.
    Anyway.

    I’ve noticed you absent from Revusky’s last thread; probably a wise decision on your part. But your input would be interesting if you have any (no need to read the piece in its entirety or more than the first few comments).

    Read some of the article, skimmed through some parts. Read some comments; got surprised by, say, “internal workings” of this site. Too much personal bullshit and politics if you ask me.
    As for the topic itself, well, got that video about Pentagon plane, so here I am:
    Before reading some stuff on this site (thank you guys, a couple only, of course) I thought one thing.
    Now I am inclined to think otherwise.
    Two things:
    I buy, 70/30 that the buildings, all of three of them, did collapse due to a peculiar combination of how they were built with how and with what they were hit, plus the rest. So, no demolitions.
    Second, Pentagon plane. That video, well….so, again, I believe that a plane (the plane) hit Pentagon.

    Now, did the government know that hijacking was going to happen, I am sure some parts of the intelligence community/security apparatus did. Was it intentionally not prevented, don’t think so. I go with incompetence and organizational culture there.

    That the event was manipulated and used for the Deep State goals, of course.
    I am sure that as soon some of them knew what was happening they started calculating and acting.
    Having said all this, I really don’t want to get into debate about that. I mean…done around zillion times already.

    One more thing.
    Mentioned my little war. So, can’t get emotionally involved into 9/11. What Americans see as a terrible thing re loss of life, limb and property, guys like me see “and…..?”.
    I am widely known as Russia hater here. So.. this

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beslan_school_siege

    is, in my book, worse than 9/11.
    Much worse.
    And, to add insult to the injury, only this

    2004

    In September 2004, following bombing attacks on two aircraft and the downtown Moscow Metro, Chechen terrorists seized over 1,000 hostages at a school in Beslan, North Ossetia.

    is on the Wikipedia site re “Terrorism in Russia”. Not even a fucking link.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wally
    You laughably stated:

    "The Jews suffered the world to walk into those “showers” in the last century. You’ll please forgive them if they prefer to say Never Again’ this time around."

    Problem is that Jews were not 'holocausted' as they allege. There was no 'millions of Jews murdered', there were no 'gas chambers'. Absurdly impossible. Proof is utterly lacking.

    It's all about lies & propaganda for profit & power.

    The facts are that the 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth?
    Only lies require censorship.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/img/HHSl.jpg

    It’s all about lies & propaganda for profit & power.

    yes, because the only thing the cow-like goyim brain understands is raw power, and for the Jews to accomplish this, they have to use treachery and lies.

    that’s why you must be made to feel guilty, so when the Senator who’s asked by Tucker Carlson, ‘why must we go to war in Syria’, and he answers ‘if you care about Israel…’

    now if you didn’t kneejerk feel guilty about all the Jews you goyim gassed and your ovens, then would you feel the proper levels of guilt for what you did to them?!

    No. You’d say ‘fuck Israel, what do I care?’

    and so this is why they had to lie about it all, because of anti-Semites like you, who otherwise wouldn’t be willing to engage in endless wars for Israel! And wouldn’t give them endless billions and build endless Holocaust museums, to guilt-trip the next generations. How dumb do you have to be?!

    It’s not rocket science man!

    If you’d have simply allowed the world to destroy Germany, and then set about building Israel on her ashes, and then sent Israel all those billions it demanded and waged endless wars on her behalf, then they wouldn’t have even needed to go to all of that trouble to create the Holocaust narrative to enslave your minds and soul$.

    Duh!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Wally
    "it is to encircle Iran and preventing it from linking up with China."

    Yet Iran is linking up with China, big time.

    https://thediplomat.com/2016/11/iran-china-sign-military-cooperation-agreement/

    http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/iran-and-china-are-strengthening-their-military-ties

    https://financialtribune.com/articles/economy-domestic-economy/69312/iran-china-h1-trade-up-31-to-18-billion

    You are right. However, they probably would prefer to have an overland connection also that is not threatened by the U.S.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Seamus Day

    I have more than you have, a man who lived in NYC and saw it happen.
     
    A friend of my mom’s who lives in Arlington, VA, called right after the news from the WTC was breaking, and smoke was coming from what the news thought was from the Capitol, and she was crying and told my mom that see just saw a plane fly into the Pentagon. I was there when my mom took the call.

    ‘and she was crying and told my mom that see just saw a plane fly into the Pentagon. I was there when my mom took the call.’

    And yet, with all the surveillance cameras, probably numbering in the hundreds, pointed right there, no video has been released by the Pentagon or FBI or CIA, for national security reasons. But there is one single linked video, easy to find, which shows an almost lightening-quick flash and what looks like a missile.
    And of course, no seats, engines, dead bodies–ever see footage of a real airplane crash?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cold N. Holefield

    So you can’t just start going on saying that these people are repeating the story, therefore the story must be true, because that is precisely the proposition that is under dispute! Can’t you see that?
     
    Why do you think I can't see that? Of course I see it!!! The next logical question then becomes, is the entire story false or is some of it false, and if some of it's false, which parts are false and which are true? That's what I'm interested in, not your Wager.

    If it doesn't mean any more to you than the Wager, then why are you even bothering with it any longer? You've proven your point, and if you're not curious beyond that, well, that's your prerogative, but I'm still curious.

    To satisfy your curiosity, it occurs to me that the Social Security Death Index might be something to check. It’s public record and you have two points to enter: her name and the date of death.

    I’d think that if she’s real and she died on 9/11/2001, there would be a record for her.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ChuckOrloski
    Cold N. Holefield commented:
    "The Wager part of it, for me at least, is non-essential. For you, yes, I realize, $10,000 is nothing to sneeze at and it’s also a matter of principle."

    Hi Cold N. Holefield,

    Agreed, above, and thanks for writing such practical sense!

    Ideally, Jon Revusky's article was written for a principled purpose.

    I trust J.R. did the work as a result of having made a choice between the forces of enlightenment & truth versus those of endarkenment & lies.

    For me, on the bright side, the anecdotal Unz / Revusky "wager" proliferates comments, but I'd like to see both scholarly men "pool" what is now apparent about the Phantom of The Flight 11 Opera, Betty Ong.

    P.S.:
    Terrific literary "screen name" pun, Cold N. Holefield! Thanks!

    Chuck Orloski,

    There’s no doubt J.R. is highly intelligent and incredibly thorough & comprehensive. I like how he even corrected my hyperbole to Keep it Honest. I respect that.

    I guess I was a bit taken aback because it appeared he was taking me the wrong way. I respect the work he’s done on this and his thinking on this. I wasn’t trying to attack him or impugn him in any way.

    Terrific literary “screen name” pun, Cold N. Holefield! Thanks!

    Thank you. Catcher In The Rye is an excellent book, and the fact that various Freaks like Mark David Chapman and John Hinckley were so drawn to it has always intrigued me. As well, the messaging in that book is Spot On. Everyone, or most everyone, is a Phoney. Or, It’s All Lies.

    Sweet dreams are made of this
    Who am I to disagree?
    I travel the world and the seven seas
    Everybody’s looking for something

    Some of them want to use you
    Some of them want to get used by you
    Some of them want to abuse you
    Some of them want to be abused

    Read More
    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
    Cold N. Holefield wrote reflectively:
    "There’s no doubt J.R. is highly intelligent and incredibly thorough & comprehensive. I like how he even corrected my hyperbole to Keep it Honest. I respect that."

    Hi "Catcher,"

    I like the way you think and how you exhibit signs of having "thick skin" with some people's lack thereof.

    Strong minds & personalities, it's too bad Jon & Ron are currently reacting as acid & base on this very "unspeakable" 9/11 matter. *

    Thanks, Cold N. Holefield!

    *The late-Thomas Merton wrote about President JFK's absolute need for having "thick skin," due to ruthless pressures being brought to bear by what the Trappist monk deigned as "UNSPEAKABLE" (domestic) warmongering forces.

    P.S.:
    I like the song-lyric you featured but for the life of me, my foot tapped, but I can't recall the title name & original artist. At first, I considered Dylan's "The Mighty Quinn (the Eskimo)."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @peterAUS

    This means that Russia is fighting a defensive war and the West the war of aggression, which by definition makes Russia right and the West wrong.
     
    Some people don't equate the regime in Kremlin with Russia.

    For the Russians “the turf”, as you put it, is our own country and we do defend it.
     
    Nobody was attacking Russia last time (5 minutes ago) I checked.
    Last time it happened '41. At least you people are fond of regurgitating that all the time.

    That we do not know.
     
    Some of us do. We also aren't bad in history either. Like remembering USSR expansion into Europe.We simply don't like to see another.
    "Do not trust Moscow". Short and simple. Keyword "trust".

    We made our positions clear.
    Let's move on.

    The “regime” — and a theocratic one — is in your beloved apartheid Jewish State. (“Israel does not have a written constitution,” “the Israeli government gives special preference to Judaism,” “Although Israel does not grant special privileges to any special Jewish group, many European Jews belong to higher social classes than Arabs and “Oriental” Jews”).
    And who are these “we” in your mysterious “We made our positions clear” – the US ziocons?
    The ziocons had attacked Russian interests in Ukraine (which borders with Russia) and arranged the NATO military bae there. The coup d’etat was to the detriments of the majority of Ukrainian people, including Ukrainian Jews that have been enjoying the triumph of banderism in Kiev and beyond since then. Nothing pleasures the Kagans’ clan more than a profitable cooperation with the followers of Bandera. “Lionized as a nationalist hero in Ukraine, Stepan Bandera was a Nazi sympathizer who left behind a horrific legacy,” https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/09/stepan-bandera-nationalist-euromaidan-right-sector/
    The ziocons have been arming and providing with the logistics the “moderate” terrorists in the Middle East, where Russia has been defending her interests by the legitimate means, on the legitimate invitation from the legitimate Syrian government — unlike the ziocon coalition of the US/NATO + Israel + the oh-so-democratic Saudis + the CIA-trained head-choppers and liver eaters.
    Russia is just another unfortunate country where the militant Jews wanted to get the upper hand for the expense of the natives. What your tribe has been commemorating for centuries during Purim? — A mass slaughter of the native population provoked by the obnoxious Jewish guests. And this is what gives joy to your tribe: “Happy is the one who seizes your [Persian, Russian, German...] infants and dashes them against the rocks.” Psalm 137:9

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Uebersetzer
    Kind of interesting, this. A staple of Unz comments and some articles is of how low-IQ everyone is outside North America and Western Europe (and even there there are blacks etc.) but suddenly they are more perceptive and see through what is phony, in say, the Central African Republic compared to the States, simply because they watch less TV.

    ‘suddenly they are more perceptive and see through what is phony, in say, the Central African Republic compared to the States, simply because they watch less TV’

    Not only do most people watch far less tv than Americans, but they are actually, many of them, INVADED BY … Americans (and Brits and French, the grand coalition in lock step). But tv brainwashes anyone it touches. Its extremely harmful effects have to be consciously unlearned, a sometimes painful process (finding out this or that cherished thing is there to do you harm, from sports teams and individuals to favorite tv shows and movies and music).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ngo Ng
    If you are not on anti-psychotic meds, you should begin taking them. If you are on anti-psychotic meds, you should immediately stop taking them.

    Michelle Malkin's blabberwith is more relevant than your "I myself" misadled sloppiness. In fact, Trump makes more sense than you. By the way my one really born in Ireland Irish friend adopted a child from Asia (so you can understand, the child is actually an asian) and the rest you can try to imagine.

    You must be a project of Ron's (a Columbia graduate crack head in rehab type project) for him to put your nuttiness to this site.

    This will trip your wire, if 911 was a false flag operation, and Betty Ong "hersef" does not exist, why?

    The Official Version of 9/11 goes something like this…

    Directed by a beardy-guy from a cave in Afghanistan, ( This well appointed Suite http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/nether_fictoid3.htm according to the London Times): nineteen hard-drinking, coke-snorting, devout Muslims enjoy lap dances before their mission to meet Allah…

    Using nothing more than craft knifes, they overpower cabin crew, passengers and pilots on four planes…

    And hangover or not, they manage to give the world’s most sophisticated air defense system the slip…

    Unfazed by leaving their “How to Fly a Passenger Jet” guide in the car at the airport, they master the controls in no-time and score direct hits on two towers, causing THREE to collapse completely…

    Our masterminds even manage to overpower the odd law of physics or two… and the world watches in awe as steel-framed buildings fall symmetrically – through their own mass – at free-fall speed, for the first time in history.

    Despite all their dastardly cunning, they stupidly give their identity away by using explosion-proof passports, which survive the fireball undamaged and fall to the ground… only to be discovered by the incredible crime-fighting sleuths at the FBI…

    …Meanwhile down in Washington…

    Hani Hanjour, having previously flunked 2-man Cessna flying school, gets carried away with all the success of the day and suddenly finds incredible abilities behind the controls of a Boeing…

    Instead of flying straight down into the large roof area of the Pentagon, he decides to show off a little…

    Executing an incredible 270 degree downward spiral, he levels off to hit the low facade of the world’s most heavily defended building…

    …all without a single shot being fired…. or ruining the nicely mowed lawn… and all at a speed just too fast to capture on video…

    …Later, in the skies above Pennsylvania…

    So desperate to talk to loved ones before their death, some passengers use sheer willpower to connect mobile calls that otherwise would not be possible until several years later…

    And following a heroic attempt by some to retake control of Flight 93, it crashes into a Shankesville field leaving no trace of engines, fuselage or occupants… except for the standard issue Muslim terrorists bandana…

    …Further south in Florida…

    President Bush, our brave Commander-in-Chief continues to read “My Pet Goat” to a class full of primary school children… shrugging off the obvious possibility that his life could be in imminent danger…

    …In New York…

    World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein blesses his own foresight in insuring the buildings against terrorist attack only six weeks previously…

    While back in Washington, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz shake their heads in disbelief at their own luck in getting the ‘New Pearl Harbor’ catalyzing event they so desired to pursue their agenda of world domination…

    And finally, not to be disturbed too much by reports of their own deaths, at least seven of our nineteen suicide hijackers turn up alive and kicking in mainstream media reports…

    And If you don’t believe this, you are a conspiracy theorist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    You reminded me of the 5 min video by James Corbett:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Rurik

    except for the vultures who got rich with the war
     
    when I read post 83, where he said " I detest the right-wing virtual signaling of people saying to me and others: “Thank you for your service.”

    I was tempted to suggest that some of them, may have wondered if he hadn't 'fragged' an ambitious lieutenant or two, and wanted to thank him for the effort.

    If a war is immoral, illegal, unconstitutional, 'based on lies, conducted against civilians for the fun and profit of evil men and women, (as all of our recent wars have clearly been)

    then there's few things in this world that would bolster my disposition more than news that one or two particularly vile war pigs might catch a bit of their own medicine.

    https://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/images/madeleine-albright-6.jpg

    you really should have put a warning atop that photo.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik
    mea culpa sir

    mea culpa
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    I have more than you have, a man who lived in NYC and saw it happen.

    Okay, I didn’t see it happen live, but was in NY six months later and saw the still-smoldering crater. Indeed, I hereby confirm that the World Trade Center is no more. And big whoop. Who ever said otherwise?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous[307] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2
    If there's a girl who looks the same, graduated at the same time, cannot be identified as a different person, has the same English first name and has the same Chinese surname then she surely is the same whatever small and understandable typo may have been made in a student produced yearbook.

    Until Revusky discounts this perfectly sensible set of inferences he cannot be said to have won the bet. A one letter transliteration mistake is hum drum. All of the conspiracy freaks keep ignoring this...I assume because they have no answer to it.

    looks the same, graduated at the same time, cannot be identified as a different person

    My thoughts exactly. She look very similar to me, although I will freely admit that my judgment in this regard may be off. Maybe it wasn’t even a typo. Maybe it was entered in the yearbook that way for some very trivial, as of yet unknown reason. Maybe the different spelling is actually a conspiracy in itself. I don’t know what the answer is, and I don’t know that anyone has ever even looked into it.

    I just find it amazing that other commenters here are suggesting that the idea that her name may have been spelled slightly differently in some old yearbook (for whatever reason) is ludicrous, crazy, outlandish nonsense that is completely outside the realm of possibility, while the simpler and more likely conclusion is that she never really existed, and is in reality part of a huge, highly elaborate, multilayered conspiracy involving dozens, possibly hundreds of people. All of the people in on the conspiracy are perfectly fine with being complicit in the murder of thousands of innocent Americans for unexplained reasons. Not a single one of these people ever comes forward. Ever.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Erebus

    Maybe it was entered in the yearbook that way for some very trivial, as of yet unknown reason.
     
    That's a stretch, given that both Betty Ng and Betty Ong are in the yearbook and that the yearbook's names would have been transcribed from the school's official student roll.

    Did the student roll contain two names for one person?
    If it did:
    Are there two transcripts? Are they the same, or different?
    Did they participate in the same, or different extracurricular clubs, associations, etc?
    Did that person get 2 graduation diplomas?

    IOW, if Betty Ng is, in fact Betty Ong then things can get weird very quickly.

    As for:

    She look very similar to me, although I will freely admit that my judgment in this regard may be off.
     
    ... the latter half of the statement would appear to be much closer to the mark than the former. FWIW, I've been living in Asia for a decade, and to my eye they're not even close. 8 or 9 years ago, I probably would've agreed with you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • @Z-man

    In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel –
     
    Isruel would not exist without the USA and the fact that they have 100 nukes, the Samson option.

    Targeted assassinations, the Jews do it, the anti Zionist movement should do it also. Oye vey do I have a list. (Grin) Surprisingly many are shabbos goys.

    Israel can exist without the USA. Nukes are a pretty good life insurance. How it would fare without US taxpayers’ money is another matter. You should bear in mind though that Jews rule the banks, the media, the entertainment, the justice, and the education in the whole Western world, not only in the US.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Nukes aren't defensive weapons and couldn't be used to stop an invasion. Israel could be invaded and taken down much more quickly than any of its neighbors. Only having a defender like the US has allowed Israel to survive this long.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The current series of railroad strikes in France are portrayed in the media as “labor unrest”, a conflict between the government and trade union leaders, or as a temporary nuisance to travelers caused by the self-interest of a privileged category of workers. In Anglo-American media, there is the usual self-satisfied tongue-clicking over “those cheese-eaters, always...
  • Good to have Ms. Johnston on this site. She has always been a great Counterpunch contributor.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Anon
    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.

    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.

    Agreed. Treachery seemed to run in the Churchill family.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The current series of railroad strikes in France are portrayed in the media as “labor unrest”, a conflict between the government and trade union leaders, or as a temporary nuisance to travelers caused by the self-interest of a privileged category of workers. In Anglo-American media, there is the usual self-satisfied tongue-clicking over “those cheese-eaters, always...
  • Pointless.

    People as Ms. Johnston should be thinking about the paradigm.

    In the current, this is what has been happening, is happening, and will be happening.
    That’s the nature of it.

    Thinking about meaning of life, nature of work, (re)distribution of goods and services and such is the only way to make any difference.

    Otherwise, most of us will be serfs for the top 20 %, “managed” and, if necessary, “retired”.

    That’s the most likely future, actually.
    The mixture of new Ancient Egypt and Huxley’s “New World Order”. No slaves and order maintained, mostly, with a gloved hand.

    Working class has been fucked over and nobody was paying attention. On the contrary, the rest liked it.
    Now they are coming for the middle class, with gusto.

    Pleasant dreams.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    There's blame to go around.
    The post-war history of American labor is of a movement with one strategy and double-down, double-down, double-down, 'till it went broke.
    There are two strategies labor needed to take and bears responsibility for failing at: 1) at about the time when it should have accepted that American laborers were getting a pretty good deal that could only be improved in the short-term by consuming the host, it should have shifted resources to bargain for the long-haul by moving for a German-style public corporate, corporate/labor model, namely where labor had a seat on the board, 2) rather than tunnel-vision resistance to free trade up to and until it simply lost in a total wash-out, it should have looked for alternative models to global trade, one of which has been on display : the British Commonwealth of Nations.
    If in 1975 American labor threw its strength behind those two long-term goals we would have a much different world today - one with much more prosperity, better distributed, and with less identity politics.
    On the right, well: the right seemed absolutely convinced that it could kill its opposition and nothing would replace it.
    You can of course kill your loyal opposition for the incremental pennies on the dollar back that its worth to you - but usually when you kill the loyal opposition its replaced by the disloyal opposition.

    When I go to places where American working class are still found - they still love America. Can't say that for the left we have, which is the left that we have the Republican right to thank for.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Rurik

    war – but then, sum up by blaming it on “The Joos.”
     
    exactly!

    if anything, the "Joos" are trying to stop all these wars!

    who came out strongest against the wars on Iraq, and then Libya and then Syria, if not the ((NYT))?!

    who has condemned the recent bombing of Syria, (over obvious lies about chemical attacks) if not Sheldon Adelson and bb Netanyahu!

    I mean come on, right?

    AIPAC has little to no influence in DC, but still that plucky little voice has been adamant that all of these wars are illegal, misguided and wrong.

    The Kagan 'cabal' (as some anti-Semites refer to them) have been demanding investigations into the contrived putsch (Yatz is our guy') in Ukraine, and all the lies about MH17!

    The entire Jewish media, from CNN to all the rest have been exposing the lies about these wars like no other! Look how they railed at Clinton for her role in Libya!

    But these tiresome anti-Semites will always look for an excuse for their own failures and failings, and it's not like we haven't seen this kind of scapegoat blaming before! When you're having difficulties, there's the temptation to always find some group to blame and spread blood libels, just as a certain mustached demagogue from history showed us all how it's done.

    It reminds me of those terrorists in Israel that never lose an opportunity to try to blame "The Joos" for all of their problems, so they attack Israel (on Passover!), and threaten to push her into the sea, demanding Hitlerian calls for genocide, like "The right of Return"!

    They may as well be building gas chambers and ovens with talk like that, and what does the world do?!

    they act all crybaby because a few terrorists got shot. Well what does these modern day Adolf Hitlers think the Jews are going to do when they demand The Right of Return / genocide?

    The Jews suffered the world to walk into those "showers" in the last century. You'll please forgive them if they prefer to say Never Again' this time around.

    From Palestinian terrorists, to neo-white supremacists like Ron Paul and PCR, pooh-poohing these wars, there's always someone looking for a group to blame for their own mediocrity and incompetence.

    You laughably stated:

    “The Jews suffered the world to walk into those “showers” in the last century. You’ll please forgive them if they prefer to say Never Again’ this time around.”

    Problem is that Jews were not ‘holocausted’ as they allege. There was no ‘millions of Jews murdered’, there were no ‘gas chambers’. Absurdly impossible. Proof is utterly lacking.

    It’s all about lies & propaganda for profit & power.

    The facts are that the ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth?
    Only lies require censorship.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    It’s all about lies & propaganda for profit & power.
     
    yes, because the only thing the cow-like goyim brain understands is raw power, and for the Jews to accomplish this, they have to use treachery and lies.

    that's why you must be made to feel guilty, so when the Senator who's asked by Tucker Carlson, 'why must we go to war in Syria', and he answers 'if you care about Israel...'

    now if you didn't kneejerk feel guilty about all the Jews you goyim gassed and your ovens, then would you feel the proper levels of guilt for what you did to them?!

    No. You'd say 'fuck Israel, what do I care?'

    and so this is why they had to lie about it all, because of anti-Semites like you, who otherwise wouldn't be willing to engage in endless wars for Israel! And wouldn't give them endless billions and build endless Holocaust museums, to guilt-trip the next generations. How dumb do you have to be?!

    It's not rocket science man!

    If you'd have simply allowed the world to destroy Germany, and then set about building Israel on her ashes, and then sent Israel all those billions it demanded and waged endless wars on her behalf, then they wouldn't have even needed to go to all of that trouble to create the Holocaust narrative to enslave your minds and soul$.

    Duh!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • @Anonymous
    It's a package deal. If they take out Russia, global domination is virtually assured and Israel will get the World's crown sooner or later. At the heart of it there's a messianic lunacy and that's why we're facing WW3 at, say, 90% probability.

    If they take out Russia, Russia will take out Israel so Israel will be a dead king. The Zionists should better reign in the neocons if they want there to be an Israel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @anonymous

    Any war failing to yield peace is purposeless and, if purposeless, both wrong and stupid.
     
    What about the most common example of war for the purpose of plunder and material gain? The morality of "wrong" doesn't enter into it and ultimate peace may or may not be a goal.
    It's not the fault of the military that Afghans haven't all cooperated with their occupation. They've done the job assigned to them but impossible jobs are, after all, impossible. It's a military-political pipe-dream that was created by the incompetents of the Bush years and the political part is unattainable.

    Madeleine Albright said it best: “If we have to use force, it is because we are America
     
    I like this "we" part. That evil witch certainly never risked herself but sent other people's children into the cauldron. There's no "we" in all this. The upper echelon sacrifices the small fry and their lives mean nothing to them.

    Having outsourced responsibility for defending the country
     
    They're not defending the country, that's mind-boggling propaganda. There's so much delusion here that one could go through this article line-by-line and dissect it. I'm off this "support our troops" wagon. It's just a fiction; you sign up, you know the risks.

    They’re not defending the country, that’s mind-boggling propaganda.

    Indeed. The last Americans to die defending their country were the Confederate soldiers who died defending theirs. All others died for the US empire, including Union forces who died while making the South it’s first victim.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • @geokat62

    For neocons,... it’s global domination, for Zionists, it’s Greater Israel...
     
    Global domination for neocons is not an end in itself, it is a means to an end... and that end is the enhancement of the security of the Jewish state.

    ... but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn’t help at all achieve the Zionists’ goals.
     
    Surely, you jest. The neocons like Robert Kaganovitch and his wife Victoria Nudelman, Willian Kristol, David Frum, etc, are obsessed with Russia as Russia is the sponsor of both Iran and Syria, which supply Hezbollah the means by which to keep Israel out of Lebanon.

    In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel
     
    While the former is true, the latter isn’t.

    The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.
     
    On this, we both can agree.

    If the US and its suppletives take on Russia, Israel becomes fair game. So to take out Russia, neocons would have to sacrify Israel. That’s where the Khazars diverge from mainstream Zionism. What’s the use of being God’s “chosen people” if you don’t rule the world but then what’s the use of ruling the world if there is no Israel?
    Zionist support of neocon agenda may well terminate their beloved creature’s existence in the ME so they should think twice before pushing their US vassal to attack Russia.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Disordered thoughts on the National Cockatoo’s latest antics. One: The aghastment and horrilation about the terrible, appalling, shocking etc nature of gas warfare is nonsense. There is nothing unusually hideous about the use of toxic chemicals. Hideous, yes, but not unusually hideous. Boring old workaday artillery, that nobody criticizes, leaves children watching as mommy frantically...
  • @Simply Simon
    JJ, I understand your anger, but I would be happy if just the major perps would be convicted. Sunday the Austin American-Statesman ran a comprehensive story commemorating the entire incident as it unfolded. Basically it was your Federal government at its worst. Yesterday the same paper ran an article concerning the lessons learned from that debacle, many years too late and millions of dollars too short. In the article one of the FBI agents there, now retired indicated he believed Hillary was the one who actually gave the go ahead to set fire to the compound.

    I would like every one of the the war criminals, from top to bottom, hanged.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Mike P

    The problem is not with the US military. It is with the post-military strategy, for which the military is ill-equipped to handle. It’s not the military that is deciding to stay forever.
     
    The failure to rebuild functioning nation states and the "need" for continuous occupation are not bugs but features. The ongoing occupation of Afghanistan has nothing to do with "fighting terror" or "spreading democracy and freedom" - it is to encircle Iran and preventing it from linking up with China. Afghanistan cannot be allowed to make its own decisions in this matter, so it must endure the occupation.
    Read More
    • Replies: @Mike P
    You are right. However, they probably would prefer to have an overland connection also that is not threatened by the U.S.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @SunBakedSuburb
    " ... whites have every liberty to form their own groups. "

    Not really. If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group. Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer's cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.

    "Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture."

    I will assume you're being sincere: Apparently, you don't follow trends. The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.

    “If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group.”

    Yet, despite SJW machinations, those whites have the freedom to form their own in-group. It doesn’t mean they are free from outside pressure. Besides, any group is “stigmatized” by their ideological opponents, so that argument goes out the door.

    “Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer’s cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.”

    Spencer’s group is indeed serious. See, you just stigmatized his merry band, yet they still remain steadfast in their desire to gain footing in their community.

    “Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture.”

    “I will assume you’re being sincere: Apparently, you don’t follow trends.”

    The trend is that the Coalition of the Fringes, Right and Left, write a narrative that normies find over-the-top.

    “The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.”

    A societal mantra as dictated by radical white liberals, not whites in general. In similar fashion, the Alt Right demands that whites accept “race realism”, lest they be labeled “race traitors” and summarily labeled as “enemies”.

    Works both ways here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @Miro23

    Perhaps the next “click” will be some kind of catastrophic false-flag attack?
     
    To be "catastrophic" means that Russia gets false-flagged, not Syria or Iran. It could happen. The Zionists want "regime change" with the destruction of Syria and Iran, and they're not going to get it while the Russians remain in the area .

    False-flags need time, preparation and co-ordination, and a clue might be the current intense anti-Russian propaganda. Modern day Zionist false-flags always seem to start with a preparatory media barrage against the target, and there's no doubt that Russia is getting the treatment.

    They could sink a US Navy ship to get their war, but what would the subsequent US assault look like? and with what kind of Russian response? It's given that the US can't fight a ground war in Syria and Iran, and it's navy and air force are too exposed to modern weapons, so as Saker suggests it could quickly develop into a Middle East nuclear war.

    This would give Israel/US/Saudi Arabia their victory, with the bet that Russia would pull back from a full inter-continental nuclear engagement given that only Syrian and Iranian targets are hit with nuclear weapons.

    However, if the fated bullet happened to be in that fated chamber, the Russians would decide to get it over with, and flatten Israel, New York, Washington, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, the Pentagon, Langley etc. with a few thousand warheads to spare.

    It’s given that the US can’t fight a ground war in Syria and Iran, and it’s navy and air force are too exposed to modern weapons….

    Wishful thinking.

    US can fight those ground wars and the other side is more exposed to modern weapons.
    Much more.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    I am an unashamed advocate of the draft to ameliorate the primary dynamic in question.

    Indeed, it would cure the primary dynamic in question practically over-night.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @lack of meaning
    I had the chance to speak with many american veterans of the Vietnam war in the 70`s . There was the draft ot the time .

    Many of them came back very sick , abuse of alcohol , drugs , postraumatic stress disorder , they committed genocides against civilians , they felt guilty , they " fragged " , they were demoralized , they felt their country had betrayed them ...

    Many of them told me that the worse was that after a time in Vietnam they did nor see the meaning of the war , some of them told me : well if those f.... gooks want to be communists , let them be communists , I do not understand them , who am I or my country to tell them what to do , after all if communism is a shitty system let them eat shit , and at the end if it is a good system we will copy them , but what the hell are we doing there ....

    The war of Vietnam was a big defeat fot the USA in the peak of its power at the hands ot a little
    backwarded country , a military defeat , a moral defeat , a human defeat , an economical defeat ( except for the vultures who got rich with the war )

    If Bacevich ( nice Russian name tovarich , privet ) defends the draft , or the arab wars , he has not learned anything fron the Vietnam war , and I am affraid from none of the arab wars , habibi .

    except for the vultures who got rich with the war

    when I read post 83, where he said ” I detest the right-wing virtual signaling of people saying to me and others: “Thank you for your service.”

    I was tempted to suggest that some of them, may have wondered if he hadn’t ‘fragged’ an ambitious lieutenant or two, and wanted to thank him for the effort.

    If a war is immoral, illegal, unconstitutional, ‘based on lies, conducted against civilians for the fun and profit of evil men and women, (as all of our recent wars have clearly been)

    then there’s few things in this world that would bolster my disposition more than news that one or two particularly vile war pigs might catch a bit of their own medicine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    you really should have put a warning atop that photo.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Ali Choudhury
    Outside of a few ritzy neighborhoods which would have been out of reach of the ordinary locals going back decades, foreign oligarchs have not been buying that much property in London. Low interest rates are the primary reason prices have skyrocketed.

    Well that’s what I hear from people there. Although, you are right that the perception and actual cause of the problem are not necessarily the same.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • To Ptrick Lang:
    “The neocons believe so strongly that America must lead the world and mankind forward that they accept the idea that the achievement of human progress justifies any means needed to advance that goal.”
    This statement has thrown me for a loop. It raises a few questions, like:
    What are the neocons?
    Aren`t the neocons Zionists?
    What are the Zionists?
    The neocons/Zionists are for “the achievement of human progress”, now?
    What is “human progress”?
    If neocons are Zionists, how does “America must lead the world and mankind forward” play into this, shouldn`t it state Israel, instead?
    Why is “America must lead the world and mankind forward” seemingly equated with “the achievement of human progress”?
    Why wasn`t it explained that “the end justifies the means” is a fallacious concept, since, if used, “the means” BECOME “the end” (humans, after all, are creatures of habit, in other words, addicts)?
    Thank you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • what bollocks.
    The purpose of all wars is conquest..

    That a few “volunteer” is hopefully a sign of decreasing stupidity.

    What sane person would fight, kill or die for the political filth?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Polish Perspective
    Eurostat is out with numbers on book reading. Curious trivia.

    https://jodi.graphics/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/People-reading-books.png

    France looks curiously low. And share is not the same as time spent. Here's that:

    https://jodi.graphics/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Time-spent-reading-books.png

    So France continues to underperform. Very strange. Finally a map:

    https://jodi.graphics/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Share-of-people-reading-books-2016-Eurostat-Jo-Di-graphics_.png

    Unfortunately the mapmaker is retarded. It isn't the "share of people" but "time spent" that is being highlighted. I was positively surprised by Greece and to some extent even Turkey. Outside of France I'd say the biggest negative outlier is Austria.

    https://jodi.graphics/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Expenditure-on-books.png

    Though if you look at expenditure on newspapers, books etc, both the French and the Austrians do decently well. Maybe they just buy more expensive books which are more intellectual but read less? Or maybe their newspapers are high-brow enough that less of book-reading is needed.

    I'd be interested in the quality of books rather than just time spent on books. Someone reading Harry Potter, 50 shades of grey and a ton of chick-lit isn't on the same level as someone reading a few major intellectual tomes per year. But I guess that would be too "elitist", or maybe hard to measure.

    I’d be interested in the quality of books rather than just time spent on books. Someone reading Harry Potter, 50 shades of grey and a ton of chick-lit isn’t on the same level as someone reading a few major intellectual tomes per year.

    Might be able to compile this from an index of sales stats based on popular, widely-translated science, history, etc. books (though I imagine Eastern Europe will be a bit underweighed due to widespread piracy).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mitleser

    What did all those brave men suffer and die for at the gates of Vienna in the 1600s and centuries before?
     
    What did all those brave Roman men suffer and die for at the gates of Anatolia in the 900s and centuries before?

    “So that a man’s right to publicly dress up as a fruity Roman soldier shall not perish from this Earth!”

    If it weren’t for those darned Turks, it would be happening in Constantinople too!

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-27/turkish-anti-riot-police-officers-disperse-lgbt-community/7545284

    “So that the poz shall perish from the Earth!”

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Seamus Day

    A conservative Scottish pastor at a Baptist Church I visited, credibly summed up the purpose of war, more accurately than Augustine:

    “The purpose of war is to take what belongs to someone else.”
     

    Bullshit. The cost of most of our recent wars is orders of magnitude more than could ever be taken from these countries. That’s why the ‘war for oil’ slogan of the left is so stupid. We spent trillions in Iraq. You don’t spend trillions for oil.

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.

    We spent trillions in Iraq. You don’t spend trillions for oil.

    No, the trillions weren’t spent (as in wasted) they were simply diverted from the public to the private sector.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Cold N. Holefield
    I'm not disputing the verity or specifics of the Wager. I'm genuinely interested in this and in getting to the bottom of it. The Wager part of it, for me at least, is non-essential. For you, yes, I realize, $10,000 is nothing to sneeze at and it's also a matter of principle. I understand, but I have no dog in that fight.

    Cold N. Holefield commented:
    “The Wager part of it, for me at least, is non-essential. For you, yes, I realize, $10,000 is nothing to sneeze at and it’s also a matter of principle.”

    Hi Cold N. Holefield,

    Agreed, above, and thanks for writing such practical sense!

    Ideally, Jon Revusky’s article was written for a principled purpose.

    I trust J.R. did the work as a result of having made a choice between the forces of enlightenment & truth versus those of endarkenment & lies.

    For me, on the bright side, the anecdotal Unz / Revusky “wager” proliferates comments, but I’d like to see both scholarly men “pool” what is now apparent about the Phantom of The Flight 11 Opera, Betty Ong.

    P.S.:
    Terrific literary “screen name” pun, Cold N. Holefield! Thanks!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cold N. Holefield
    Chuck Orloski,

    There's no doubt J.R. is highly intelligent and incredibly thorough & comprehensive. I like how he even corrected my hyperbole to Keep it Honest. I respect that.

    I guess I was a bit taken aback because it appeared he was taking me the wrong way. I respect the work he's done on this and his thinking on this. I wasn't trying to attack him or impugn him in any way.

    Terrific literary “screen name” pun, Cold N. Holefield! Thanks!
     
    Thank you. Catcher In The Rye is an excellent book, and the fact that various Freaks like Mark David Chapman and John Hinckley were so drawn to it has always intrigued me. As well, the messaging in that book is Spot On. Everyone, or most everyone, is a Phoney. Or, It's All Lies.

    Sweet dreams are made of this
    Who am I to disagree?
    I travel the world and the seven seas
    Everybody's looking for something

    Some of them want to use you
    Some of them want to get used by you
    Some of them want to abuse you
    Some of them want to be abused
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • @Anonymous
    Very good post.

    Thanks

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @mark green
    Well-written article, but Andrew Bacevich avoids (as usual) examining--or even mentioning--(1) the massive money, (2) entrenched political machinery, and (3) intellectual sleight-of-hand which funds, formulates, and justifies Washington's lopsided and murderous Mideast 'foreign policies'.

    Shall we count the bodies together, Andrew?

    Iraq, for instance, was a functioning and rising society before Zio-American forces went in there and annihilated it. Millions died or were wounded. Millions more have been displaced. Chaos came next.

    Shouldn't the perpetrators be identified and punished, Mr. Bacevich?

    Any thoughts on crime and punishment?

    In the meantime, let's see if we can detect a pattern in all this.

    Here's the hit list:

    Anti-Zionist Iraq: Crushed and neutralized. Anti-Zionist Syria: In ruins. Anti-Zionist Palestine: Under siege and in permanent lockdown. Anti-Zionist Libya: Dismembered and neutralized. And (coming soon): Death, misery and mayhem delivered to pro-Palestinian (and anti-Zionist) Lebanon and pro-Palestinian (anti-Zionist) Iran.

    Is there a pattern here?--(one that Mr. Bacevich failed to notice)

    Perhaps.

    Are there pro-Zionist fingerprints in this crime scene?

    Oh, maybe.

    With entire nations destroyed, does this massive destruction not have the appearance of a criminal enterprise?

    Possibly.

    But support our troops!

    Bibi was right when he (privately) whispered to a concerned Israeli: "Don't worry about America. America can be moved."

    So true.

    America has certainly been 'moved'.

    We are headed over a cliff!

    But Bacevich barely notices. His 'scholarship' is typical of the Zionist-friendly, PC drivel that emanates from 'TomDispatch'.

    Fact: Zio-Washington is on a prolonged, blood-soaked, trillion-dollar killing spree.

    Can we talk about it?

    Death, discord and destruction (of Israel's foes) is the objective.

    So from an Israeli perspective, things are going very well in Libya, Iraq, Syria and Palestine.

    Israel is rising. Her foes are sinking.

    America's 'military disasters' are just what the Jewish doctor ordered. Mission accomplished!

    Yet all Bacevich can finally say is that America's all-volunteer army is "the root cause of our predicament".

    Are we to take this man seriously?

    What about Israel's de facto ownership of the US Congress, Andrew?

    Any thoughts about 'patterns' of ownership of American mass media, Mr. Bacevich?

    Maybe next article, eh?

    Bacevich as presented his readers a huge puzzle which he is determined not to solve. Perhaps that's his objective.

    Fact: Zio-Washington is on a prolonged, blood-soaked, trillion-dollar killing spree.

    multi-trillion dollar killing spree

    What about Israel’s de facto ownership of the US Congress, Andrew?

    Any thoughts about ‘patterns’ of ownership of American mass media, Mr. Bacevich?

    Bacevich is a rank whore

    an unctuous, gaping gash, undulating in yawning anticipation for copious and well-earned wampum.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Ngo Ng
    What's your evidence that they were "clearly reading from a script"?

    He just got through saying that he read it in a book.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • I had the chance to speak with many american veterans of the Vietnam war in the 70`s . There was the draft ot the time .

    Many of them came back very sick , abuse of alcohol , drugs , postraumatic stress disorder , they committed genocides against civilians , they felt guilty , they ” fragged ” , they were demoralized , they felt their country had betrayed them …

    Many of them told me that the worse was that after a time in Vietnam they did nor see the meaning of the war , some of them told me : well if those f…. gooks want to be communists , let them be communists , I do not understand them , who am I or my country to tell them what to do , after all if communism is a shitty system let them eat shit , and at the end if it is a good system we will copy them , but what the hell are we doing there ….

    The war of Vietnam was a big defeat fot the USA in the peak of its power at the hands ot a little
    backwarded country , a military defeat , a moral defeat , a human defeat , an economical defeat ( except for the vultures who got rich with the war )

    If Bacevich ( nice Russian name tovarich , privet ) defends the draft , or the arab wars , he has not learned anything fron the Vietnam war , and I am affraid from none of the arab wars , habibi .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    except for the vultures who got rich with the war
     
    when I read post 83, where he said " I detest the right-wing virtual signaling of people saying to me and others: “Thank you for your service.”

    I was tempted to suggest that some of them, may have wondered if he hadn't 'fragged' an ambitious lieutenant or two, and wanted to thank him for the effort.

    If a war is immoral, illegal, unconstitutional, 'based on lies, conducted against civilians for the fun and profit of evil men and women, (as all of our recent wars have clearly been)

    then there's few things in this world that would bolster my disposition more than news that one or two particularly vile war pigs might catch a bit of their own medicine.

    https://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/images/madeleine-albright-6.jpg
    , @anarchyst
    SHAME ON YOU..."lack of meaning"
    YOU and your ilk are responsible for perpetuating the "Vietnam Veteran" stereotype in which YOU paint all of us with a very broad brush. For your information, almost ALL of us Vietnam veterans came back with sound minds to an ungrateful country and quietly resumed our lives without incident or fanfare. The promised government jobs that were mandated into law for returning Vietnam veterans never materialized. YOU are of the same ilk as traitor "Hanoi" Jane Fonda who gave "aid and comfort" to the enemy while our POWS were (and are) still in captivity. Very few returning Vietnam veterans had problems...the stereotype that YOU claim...is totally false.
    I notice that you have swallowed the standard "loss of Vietnam" lies hook line and sinker. Americans and South Vietnamese prevailed in every battle...bar none. In fact, TET 1968 was a decisive victory for the South s the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces were decimated. Of course, the American "mainstream media" claimed it was a victory for the communists.
    For your information, the American Vietnam war was not a "civil-war" but was an INVASION by the North Vietnamese, who wanted control of the whole country. The INVASION was allowed to continue when American troops left and South Vietnamese troops were not resupplied.
    YOU must have watched the Ken Burns' "schlockumentary" on Vietnam, in which he built up the North Vietnamese while exacting harsh criticism (lies) on the American and South Vietnamese troops. Of course, to his credit, Burns "let it slip" that the "re-education camps" contrary to communist claims (actually prisons) would be in operation for approximately six months after the war was over--it turns out that many former South Vietnamese were "detained" for as long as twenty years.
    Post-war Vietnam was so wonderful, tens of thousands of "boat people risked life and limb to escape that "communist paradise" [silence].
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Steve Gittelson

    What’s pathetic here is that you think you’re being funny.
     
    What's pathetic is that you conspiracy wackadoodles thinks it makes any difference if any of it IS a product of conspiracy. It doesn't.

    Fine, let's say the 9/11 events are products of conspiracy. Let's say the CIA colluded with Mossad to do it so that America will support and fund Israel ad infinitum. Media foments distrust for all things Arabic. "Hate Islam" reigns, etc.

    So what? What are you going to DO???? How are circumstances and conditions going to change?? How will the corrupted ship of state right itself?

    Heck, personally, I'm inclined to believe the CIA and Mossad had a lot to do with what happened. I think the CIA and Mossad made some converts, provided ideas and support, and let external actors run with it. It doesn't surprise me a bit. Worse, I believe that puneto of a President was in on it from the git-go. Washington is corrupt, criminally treasonous right down to its last little toenail.

    But, so what? The MI-complex rules. Israel dictates at least 80% of all US government policy. The productive class of American citizens is being systematically stripped of all wealth and power.

    So, you want to expose "conspiracies" with a weak sauce of conjecture and Internet gossip? And everything will be fixed? America will return to equal rights under constitutional democracy? The sky will be blue, babies will laugh under the Sun of Freedom, and the Mexicans will go back to Mexico?

    WTF, man? Grow the f--k up.

    So what? What are you going to DO???? How are circumstances and conditions going to change?? How will the corrupted ship of state right itself?

    One useful thing Americans could do with this information is to stop giving them what they wanted out of 911 to begin with. Stop supporting any wars and the next time something big or small happens and they say “and now we need to pass The Patriot Act 2.0″ .. or they need to ban guns, or anytime US citizens are asked to sacrifice their rights, security, blood or treasure as the result of a crisis we can all just say no.

    And yet after the fake chemical gas attack this month nearly everyone is back at it again in the media telling us it was real. I’m assuming most Americans just believe it.

    It’s possible to turn this around. Something like 75% of Americans no longer believed in the Warren Commission by the early 1990′s. And now according to a recent Rasmussen poll 51% of US citizens don’t believe the government’s story on 911.

    This is a good development. Who can be most easily taken advantage of, the credulous or the skeptical? I for one am looking forward to a time when even the conservative Americans who voted for Bush no longer believe in 911 and realize that the justifications for almost every war in the 20th century, including WWI and WWII were all shams.

    It’s not impossible. As Ron Unz himself pointed out that up until about 1949 the standard textbook assumption about the Civil War that most historians openly touted was that the Civil War had little or nothing to do with slavery but instead was to do with northern industrial interests.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[294] • Disclaimer says:

    But, look, the origin of the wager was that it was competely inconceivable to Ron Unz that the story would not check out.

    From the snippets of the discussion that you published, it seems more likely that Ron Unz felt it was unlikely that Betty Ong was NOT in the GWHS yearbook, but that it would be interesting if it turned out she wasn’t. Hence the challenge to JR to prove this (limited) negative by reference to the cardboard-and-paper yearbook.

    If it turns out – as JR suspects – that there may have been some hanky-panky with the digital pages (insertion of the name “Betty Ong”) that diverges from the paper version, the matter becomes even more interesting.

    At 530 comments so far, reader interest appears to be considerable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In March 2003, Pat Buchanan wrote a groundbreaking article entitled "Whose War?" in opposition to the Bush Administration fueled growing hysteria over Saddam Hussein’s alleged weapons of mass destruction which was producing demands for an armed intervention to disarm him. Buchanan rightly identified a number of prominent Jewish officials and journalists closely tied to the...
  • @tac
    LOL (People are having enough of these anti-Russian propaganda campaigns and are venting their frustrations in various ways):

    https://twitter.com/michaelchildi/status/986418411696742406

    This is one of the poster's I was referring to in my previous reply:

    https://twitter.com/Ian56789/status/987231852959236096

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I have never ruled out the possibility that Russia is responsible for the attack in Salisbury, amongst other possibilities. But I do rule out the possibility that Assad is dropping chemical weapons in Ghouta. In this extraordinary war, where Saudi-funded jihadist head choppers have Israeli air support and US and UK military “advisers”, every time...
  • @tac
    The comment above only shows Ian56's link, but not PartisanGirl's ...

    I'm not sure what happened to the link to PartisanGirl's response to the Guardian article but here it is again:
    https://twitter.com/Partisangirl/status/987386740104036352

    Also RT has an article on these 'Russian Bots':

    https://www.rt.com/uk/424716-uk-government-accuse-bot-russia/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Fran Macadam
    One fiendish way to neutralize the good counsel of those against these wars, is to state all the many obvious and provable negative motives, properties and consequences of war - but then, sum up by blaming it on "The Joos."

    war – but then, sum up by blaming it on “The Joos.”

    exactly!

    if anything, the “Joos” are trying to stop all these wars!

    who came out strongest against the wars on Iraq, and then Libya and then Syria, if not the ((NYT))?!

    who has condemned the recent bombing of Syria, (over obvious lies about chemical attacks) if not Sheldon Adelson and bb Netanyahu!

    I mean come on, right?

    AIPAC has little to no influence in DC, but still that plucky little voice has been adamant that all of these wars are illegal, misguided and wrong.

    The Kagan ‘cabal’ (as some anti-Semites refer to them) have been demanding investigations into the contrived putsch (Yatz is our guy’) in Ukraine, and all the lies about MH17!

    The entire Jewish media, from CNN to all the rest have been exposing the lies about these wars like no other! Look how they railed at Clinton for her role in Libya!

    But these tiresome anti-Semites will always look for an excuse for their own failures and failings, and it’s not like we haven’t seen this kind of scapegoat blaming before! When you’re having difficulties, there’s the temptation to always find some group to blame and spread blood libels, just as a certain mustached demagogue from history showed us all how it’s done.

    It reminds me of those terrorists in Israel that never lose an opportunity to try to blame “The Joos” for all of their problems, so they attack Israel (on Passover!), and threaten to push her into the sea, demanding Hitlerian calls for genocide, like “The right of Return”!

    They may as well be building gas chambers and ovens with talk like that, and what does the world do?!

    they act all crybaby because a few terrorists got shot. Well what does these modern day Adolf Hitlers think the Jews are going to do when they demand The Right of Return / genocide?

    The Jews suffered the world to walk into those “showers” in the last century. You’ll please forgive them if they prefer to say Never Again’ this time around.

    From Palestinian terrorists, to neo-white supremacists like Ron Paul and PCR, pooh-poohing these wars, there’s always someone looking for a group to blame for their own mediocrity and incompetence.

    Read More
    • LOL: mark green
    • Replies: @Wally
    You laughably stated:

    "The Jews suffered the world to walk into those “showers” in the last century. You’ll please forgive them if they prefer to say Never Again’ this time around."

    Problem is that Jews were not 'holocausted' as they allege. There was no 'millions of Jews murdered', there were no 'gas chambers'. Absurdly impossible. Proof is utterly lacking.

    It's all about lies & propaganda for profit & power.

    The facts are that the 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth?
    Only lies require censorship.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/img/HHSl.jpg

    , @jacques sheete
    You forgot that we goyim are all motivated by jealousy, too! ;)

    Ya wanna hear something utterly depressing? I was talking to a young lady who's been working on some degree in nursing and she said that they were required to take an "ethics" class. Guess what the big issue was? Yup, "The" Holycaust!!!!

    Cheezus, the holycaust fanatics are everywhere. I mean everywhere and the layers of irony are piled on thick. You can bet your sore emerods that they weren't discussing the "ethics" of making stuff like that up and brainwashing people with it 75 years after it was supposed to have occurred.

    The holocaust conspiracy theorists just never give up. They are obsessed; nutzo! Good grief.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Jonathan Revusky

    Interesting that most of the photos of “Betty” on findagrave.com were added in 2017, 16 years after she died, by someone going by “paradise965.” Clicking over to paradise965’s profile on the site, I see they’ve added 81 (!) memorials on the site:

     

    Yeah, I saw that earlier. I came across the same thing but it's not in the article because it's not directly relevant.

    But all that is extraordinary, isn't it? All these murky events and there is a set of people adding virtual memorials for all these alleged victims on that site!

    I almost thought the other commenters had you with this “Betty Ng” (admittedly, facial recognition isn’t my strength), until I saw that. You’d think they’d at least bother to create different usernames for the different events!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Introduction As of April 7, nearly three thousand unarmed Christian, Muslim and secular Palestinians have been wounded, over three dozen are in critical condition and at least twenty-five unarmed protestors, including children have been assassinated by hundreds of Israeli snipers and heavily armed troops shooting tank shells into crowds of civilians protesting their decades of...
  • anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    Actor Gerard Depardieu, singer Charles Aznavour and former President Nicolas Sarkozy are among some 300 well-known French people urging national action to counter a “new anti-Semitism” that they blame on rising Islamic radicalism.
    They signed a manifesto published Sunday in Le Parisien newspaper, joining politicians from the right and left, as well as Jewish, Muslim and Catholic leaders.
    The statement urges prominent Muslims to denounce anti-Jewish and anti-Christian references in the Quran as outdated so “no believer can refer to a holy text to commit a crime.” It also calls for combating anti-Semitism “before it’s too late.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-bc-eu–france-anti-semitism-20180422-story.html

    Audacity of these bastards!! Made possible by the Jews’s support to the anti Islam brouhaha and by the Jew creation of Islamophobia.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • During the bombing of Baghdad in January 1991 I went with other journalists on a government-organised trip to what they claimed was the remains of a baby milk plant at Abu Ghraib which the US had just destroyed, saying that it was really a biological warfare facility. Walking around the wreckage, I found a smashed-up...
  • Patrick Cockburn is the same guy who claimed without any evidence that the Syrian government was behind this year and last year’s chemical attacks. Now he says beware of people who claim to know what’s going on in Syria. Sounds like he’s trying to rehabilitate himself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Introduction As of April 7, nearly three thousand unarmed Christian, Muslim and secular Palestinians have been wounded, over three dozen are in critical condition and at least twenty-five unarmed protestors, including children have been assassinated by hundreds of Israeli snipers and heavily armed troops shooting tank shells into crowds of civilians protesting their decades of...
  • @JoaoAlfaiate
    It matters not what the Palestinians do. They could be led by Gandhi and Mother Teresa but whatever they do, given their opposition to the Zionist enterprise, they are going to be marginalized and demonized.

    “It matters not what the Palestinians do. They could be led by Gandhi and Mother Teresa but whatever they do, given their opposition to the Zionist enterprise, they are going to be marginalized and demonized.”

    Israel’s George Washington David Ben Gurion – “It doesn’t matter what the goy (non Jews) think – it only matter what the Jews do.”

    Ben Gurion already knew that they already effectively controlled the world via their effective control of England, United States, France and via the Rothchild’s and other Jew’s banking empire and their control of the mass media. They have been doing what they or anyone should ever try to do i.e, become masters of the world in order to be mankind’s blessing and light etc. for a long time. Strabo a Greek cartographer said he “found them in high places everywhere” in every country he traveled through. Cicero in 50 BC feared their power in Rome. Voltaire wrote that he wouldn’t be surprised ‘if these people will one day become deadly to the human race.” Ben Franklin and George Washington thought they were dangerous to the Republic. And here they are being revered venerated celebrated adored bootlicked brown nosed kowtow fawned funded and protected and groveled before – and justifiably feared because they never forget and never forgive – by not only the entire United States but also by the entire Christian West and all of it’s international allies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @mark green
    Well-written article, but Andrew Bacevich avoids (as usual) examining--or even mentioning--(1) the massive money, (2) entrenched political machinery, and (3) intellectual sleight-of-hand which funds, formulates, and justifies Washington's lopsided and murderous Mideast 'foreign policies'.

    Shall we count the bodies together, Andrew?

    Iraq, for instance, was a functioning and rising society before Zio-American forces went in there and annihilated it. Millions died or were wounded. Millions more have been displaced. Chaos came next.

    Shouldn't the perpetrators be identified and punished, Mr. Bacevich?

    Any thoughts on crime and punishment?

    In the meantime, let's see if we can detect a pattern in all this.

    Here's the hit list:

    Anti-Zionist Iraq: Crushed and neutralized. Anti-Zionist Syria: In ruins. Anti-Zionist Palestine: Under siege and in permanent lockdown. Anti-Zionist Libya: Dismembered and neutralized. And (coming soon): Death, misery and mayhem delivered to pro-Palestinian (and anti-Zionist) Lebanon and pro-Palestinian (anti-Zionist) Iran.

    Is there a pattern here?--(one that Mr. Bacevich failed to notice)

    Perhaps.

    Are there pro-Zionist fingerprints in this crime scene?

    Oh, maybe.

    With entire nations destroyed, does this massive destruction not have the appearance of a criminal enterprise?

    Possibly.

    But support our troops!

    Bibi was right when he (privately) whispered to a concerned Israeli: "Don't worry about America. America can be moved."

    So true.

    America has certainly been 'moved'.

    We are headed over a cliff!

    But Bacevich barely notices. His 'scholarship' is typical of the Zionist-friendly, PC drivel that emanates from 'TomDispatch'.

    Fact: Zio-Washington is on a prolonged, blood-soaked, trillion-dollar killing spree.

    Can we talk about it?

    Death, discord and destruction (of Israel's foes) is the objective.

    So from an Israeli perspective, things are going very well in Libya, Iraq, Syria and Palestine.

    Israel is rising. Her foes are sinking.

    America's 'military disasters' are just what the Jewish doctor ordered. Mission accomplished!

    Yet all Bacevich can finally say is that America's all-volunteer army is "the root cause of our predicament".

    Are we to take this man seriously?

    What about Israel's de facto ownership of the US Congress, Andrew?

    Any thoughts about 'patterns' of ownership of American mass media, Mr. Bacevich?

    Maybe next article, eh?

    Bacevich as presented his readers a huge puzzle which he is determined not to solve. Perhaps that's his objective.

    Great post, just what I think.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • @Anonymous
    It's a package deal. If they take out Russia, global domination is virtually assured and Israel will get the World's crown sooner or later. At the heart of it there's a messianic lunacy and that's why we're facing WW3 at, say, 90% probability.

    I saw this in the brochure:

    Refuge for the Jews..
    Guard the flank of the Suez for the British..
    Western capitalist power against the Arab Soviet back Socialists for the cold warriors..
    Democracy in the Middle East for Americans..
    Jesus is coming soon for the Evangelicals ..
    Access to oil for the Investment bankers ..

    Something in it for everyone, yay.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @DESERT FOX
    The attack on 911 was done by Israel and the deep state ziocons and no planes were used only holograms of planes, the WTC was hit with directed energy weapons and 7 WTC buildings were destroyed.

    The pentagon was a preplanted charge ie no plane or missile hit the pentagon.

    Check Dr. Judy Wood.com for details and check the youtube videos the John Lear.

    The attack on 911 was done by Israel and the deep state ziocons

    Agreed on this only. Nothing else you said seems reasonable or even necessary. Stay away from Judy Wood. I suspect someone is paying her to be that obnoxious.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • As a Vietnam War vet, I detest the right-wing virtual signaling of people saying to me and others: “Thank you for your service.”

    How do they know what kind of service I rendered? Was it honorable or dishonorable? Did I perform my duties or just drink booze and chase the native women? Most of us serving did a little bit of all of the foregoing.

    But methinks the Col. doesn’t understand Trump and his followers. The worldwide transition of values and forces will hasten immanent events that will rock the post-war foundations is ongoing, but not elevated up to the public consciousness yet. Stay tuned. April showers bring May flowers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    I would encourage you not to despise the good will of citizens, even when it is irritating. I appreciate your service. I honor your sacrifice in Vietnam and millions of S. Vietnamese respect what you and your fellows did on their behalf. We generally assume that you served honorably, if not that is a matter for you to rest with your conscience.


    I want to encourage you to embrace whatever blessings citizens can and are willing to bestow -- even if in the main said bequeathed is obtuse and annoying. No one wants to insult vets, well few anymore and no one can immediately heal the wounds of an ungrateful and vastly misinformed citizenry on the issue of Vietnam. But I like to encourage you to let them try and embrace it the same -----


    excuse or not my well intentioned comments. I tell me father repeatedly, "Appreciate your service" he too served in Vietnam and elsewhere.


    so great a sacrifice none can repay . . .
    , @Steve Gittelson

    April showers bring May flowers.
     
    If April showers bring May flowers, what do May flowers bring?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Steve Gittelson

    NIST admitted in their study and analysis of WTC7 that it fell at free-fall for 2.25 seconds or roughly 8 stories.
     
    Let me give you just a trifling bit of assistance with your wild-eyed horror at the thought of NIST making a statement without absolute qualification on all physical phenomena related .... : NOTHING falls in atmosphere as pure "free fall". NOTHING. Got that?

    Yes, I know ... that just means NIST was part of the conspiracy.

    Oh, lord, why am I talking to loons?

    There, there, everyone knows that nothing “perfect” exists anywhere, not even a perfect vacuum in outer space where there is at least a molecule of something every cubic yard or so. So of course, the buildings did not fall in “perfect free fall.” There was some air resistance. “Free fall” is just a manner of speaking to say that they fell because they were demolished with a controlled demolition, that’ s all. And of course, it was not a “perfectly” controlled demolition either, but it did the job.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Brabantian
    Italy's former President, Francesco Cossiga, flat-out told Italy's largest newspaper, the Corriere della Serra, that major governments in Europe all privately know, that 9-11 was run by USA & Mossad
    http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2818/217/original.jpg

    Thanks, if anyone wants a link:

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/ex-italian-president-intel-agencies-know-9-11-an-inside-job/7550

    Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, Francesco Cossiga, has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy’s most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.

    Cossiga was elected President of Italian Senate in July 1983 before being winning a landslide 1985 election to become President of the country in 1985.

    Cossiga gained respect from opposition parties as one of a rare breed – an honest politician – and led the country for seven years until April 1992.

    Cossiga’s tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio – a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s.

    Gladio’s specialty was to carry out what they coined “false flag operations,” terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition.

    Cossiga’s revelations contributed to an Italian parliamentary investigation of Gladio in 2000, during which evidence was unearthed that the attacks were being overseen by the U.S. intelligence apparatus.

    In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, “You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force … the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

    Cossiga’s new revelations appeared last week in Italy’s oldest and most widely read newspaper, Corriere della Sera. Below appears a rough translation.

    “[Bin Laden supposedly confessed] to the Qaeda September [attack] to the two towers in New York [claiming to be] the author of the attack of the 11, while all the [intelligence services] of America and Europe … now know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the CIA American and the Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part … in Iraq [and] Afghanistan.”

    Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9/11 in 2001, and is quoted in Webster Tarpley’s book as stating that “The mastermind of the attack must have been a “sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel.”

    Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga’s assertion that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies is highly unlikely to be mentioned by any establishment media outlets, because like the hundreds of other sober ex-government, military, air force professionals, allied to hundreds more professors and intellectuals – he can’t be sidelined as a crackpot conspiracy theorist.a

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So you can’t just start going on saying that these people are repeating the story, therefore the story must be true, because that is precisely the proposition that is under dispute! Can’t you see that?

    Why do you think I can’t see that? Of course I see it!!! The next logical question then becomes, is the entire story false or is some of it false, and if some of it’s false, which parts are false and which are true? That’s what I’m interested in, not your Wager.

    If it doesn’t mean any more to you than the Wager, then why are you even bothering with it any longer? You’ve proven your point, and if you’re not curious beyond that, well, that’s your prerogative, but I’m still curious.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    To satisfy your curiosity, it occurs to me that the Social Security Death Index might be something to check. It's public record and you have two points to enter: her name and the date of death.

    I'd think that if she's real and she died on 9/11/2001, there would be a record for her.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    According to Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying In International Politics by John J. Mearsheimer (Oxford University Press) Lying isn't necessary, useful or even possible most of the time.
    A False Flag 9/11 would require total mastery of US government, intelligence security, police, and most crucially the army, which could always stage a coup. It just isn't that easy to be make a selfish penguin conspiracy work. A nation state is not as sophisticated as a bunch on penguins.

    A False Flag 9/11 would require total mastery of US government, intelligence security, police, ….

    This reflects such confused, warped thinking. Let’s try to unravel this a bit… Think about this question:

    If a political faction did have total mastery over every power center in the country, why would they need to execute a False Flag psy-op in the first place?

    I mean, just think about that a bit.

    You see, there are various proven false flags in history, like the Mukden incident where the Japs had a “terrorist attack” on their own railway somewhere in Manchuria, I think. But the point of the false flag is that the faction that wants to get the country further into the situation in China, they execute the operation to make their case for the policy they want.

    If the faction behind the false flag already had total mastery over every power center, then they just do WTF they want! They don’t need the false flag in the first place!

    Aside from the proven false flags, like that one, there are almost certain false flags, like the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana Harbor. And so on…

    But the reason for the false flag is that there is a political faction that wants whatever policy (typically some war of aggression that will be presented as not being a war of aggression) and to get that policy, they execute this psy-op to pave the way for the policy they want that would otherwise be politically impossible, typically because most people do not want that policy, they don’t want the wars etc….

    So, the war party that executes the false flag does so precisely because they do not have total control.

    Okay, that’s enough on your plate for now. The above is just like Deep Politics 101. Just think about it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[198] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    But bizarrely George Washington High School, per your 75th Anniversary Link, contends she did attend their school even though she’s not listed in the Yearbook.
     
    Well, actually, to be precise, the 75th anniversary event would be organized by the alumni association, I suppose, not the school administration specifically. That is why it's a separate website.

    But, look, the origin of the wager was that it was competely inconceivable to Ron Unz that the story would not check out. To the extent that he told me I was wasting my time to even bother.

    So, if Ron Unz reasons this way, it stands to reason that the people who set up that website likely reason the same way. It was so widely reported that Betty Ong graduated from George Washington High School in 1974 that they never checked!

    The fundamental problem here is that the Ronnie Unz reasoning in question is flawed. The repetition of a story does not make it true! That was what, in final analysis, the wager was about.

    So you can't just start going on saying that these people are repeating the story, therefore the story must be true, because that is precisely the proposition that is under dispute! Can't you see that?


    Perhaps George Washington High School can provide copies of her Original Transcripts since she isn’t shown in the Yearbook.
     
    Well, I didn't have a wager with Ron Unz about any transcripts, just about the yearbook.

    Maybe you can make a wager with him on this. (I'm personally tired of the whole thing so I leave it to you.)

    However, if Unz makes a separate wager with you on the transcripts, I would like him to pay me off on this wager on the yearbook first.

    Speaking of that site, further examination yields oddities in sfgenealogy. Several people on that site are clearly misidentified or misspelled: Mark O’Neill has become Mark O’Niel, for instance. Lisa Look, who pays tribute to Betty Ong on the sign-in page, identifies herself as graduating in ’75 but is listed as graduating in ’76. So I don’t think other errors are unlikely.

    You did make a plausible enough case to intrigue me enough to make me waste several hours of my life (which is probably about what you spent), I’ll give you that, but if that’s all …

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jonathan Revusky

    JR has provided a link where George Washington High School heralds Betty Ong as their most Distinguished Alumnus.
     
    Well, they don't say that explicitly. The main page of that site, specifically for the celebration of the school's 75th anniversary, has Betty up top. She is in a higher position than the actor Danny Glover, or Maya Angelou, or the singer Johnny Mathis, whose photos appear lower down on the page. That is here:

    http://www.gwhs75thanniversary.com/

    Unless that link JR provided is bogus.
     
    Dude, the above site is something I just found in a search. It is a website related to the celebration of the 75th anniversary of that school. 1936-2011. It never crossed my mind that it was anything other than what it represents itself as, because it is beyond my comprehension that anybody would create such an elaborate hoax just for the pure heck of it!

    Do you seriously think there is much possibility that that site is fraudulent?

    Dude, the above site is something I just found in a search. It is a website related to the celebration of the 75th anniversary of that school. 1936-2011. It never crossed my mind that it was anything other than what it represents itself as, because it is beyond my comprehension that anybody would create such an elaborate hoax just for the pure heck of it!

    Do you seriously think there is much possibility that that site is fraudulent?

    Dude, chill. I’m not saying you made the website up. No, I don’t seriously think the site is fraudulent.

    You’re making a leap yourself by claiming those responsible for the 75th anniversary site heralded Betty as a prominent alumnus based off of the news stories. You don’t know that. Maybe they did, or maybe they didn’t.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jonathan Revusky

    No he should not. You must get a hard copies of yearbooks
     
    Utu, did Ron Unz appoint you as his advocate? If Ron Unz wants to argue that the only way to settle the question is with a hard copy, let him show up and make the argument. But there is no point in arguing with you!

    The digital copy can be altered by people like you.
     
    No, it can't. The digital copy is up there on the classmates.com site. I have no way of altering it. (Maybe somebody else has the means to alter that, but NOT ME!)

    You're just talking shit and obviously doing so out of personal hostility towards me. Be hostile towards me, fine, but find some legitimate arguments if you can. Don't just start picking up random shit and flinging it at me like a monkey. (Though, okay, I suppose you can't help it, it's in your nature...)


    It is possible you did tin order to swindle Ron Unz.
     
    Well, it's not possible because I cannot alter the version on the classmates.com website. Anybody can sign up for an account there and peruse the yearbooks. The graphics in the article are just screenshots I took when doing so. Anybody can do that. When I sent Unz the email outlining what I had found out, I gave him the URL's to do so but pointed out that you need to sign in with a (free) account to do that. That's all. But it's easy to do so. Actually, here is the URL for the page with "Black Betty" on it.

    http://www.classmates.com/siteui/yearbooks/4182821566?page=157&searchTerm=betty&yearbookViewerEnabled=true&swipeEnabled=true

    But if you don't have an account, it redirects you to a login page and you need to sign up for an account. You do that and log in and try that URL and you'll see. But you would know that if you weren't such a pathetic bullshitter, because you would have gone through those steps.

    And the whole idea that I have some project of swindling Unz is preposterous! What is this? The classic swindle where you induce somebody to wager $10,000 that somebody is in a yearbook??!!

    Sure, that's a classic confidence trick, up there with selling people swamp land in Florida!


    He clearly stated (presuming that what you cite indeed came from his email) that you should spend $500 or so and get the hard copy.
     
    That is basically nonsense. Ron was just thinking out loud about how I could get my hands on a yearbook, that's all. There was no requirement that I spend $500 to get one! Like, suppose I was in Frisco and happened on the yearbook in a box of old junk at a garage sale and somebody sold it to me for $1. Are you saying that this would be no good because there was a requirement for me to spend $500 on the yearbook?

    This is just all such nonsense. And even if it were not such nonsense, it would be a waste of time to argue with you or anybody else here who is NOT Ron Unz! Unz did not appoint you as his advocate! If he wants to show up and argue that he did not lose the wager because of blah blah blah, then let him show up and argue the case. And if he declines to do that, then he has OBVIOUSLY conceded the wager. The wager was about whether this person, the Betty Ong who made the phone call on 9/11, the Chinese flight attendant, is in the yearbook. She clearly is NOT!

    That is basically nonsense. Ron was just thinking out loud about how I could get my hands on a yearbook, that’s all. There was no requirement that I spend $500 to get one!

    Are you for real? Do you really believe there was a formal bet and now it is you who can interpret what ever was written in emails between you and RU to your advantage? I still thought a bit (not much but a tiny bit) more about you thinking that perhaps you are interested in finding some facts about Betty Ong but it looks like you just want the money because RU happened to inadvertently utter the amount of $10k and actually you believe that you deserve it. What a chutzpah!

    Ron Unz definitively should not pay you anything, though as I wrote earlier it would be nice if he hired a PI to investigate existence of Betty Ong. And definitively he should not engage in personal communication with you. Nobody should.

    Read More
    • Troll: L.K
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • Russia is not irked by the resignation. Declarations indicate indifference toward the unrest.

    https://themoscowtimes.com/news/moscow-reacts-to-resignation-of-armenian-prime-minister-sargsyan-61243

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Sean
    According to Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying In International Politics by John J. Mearsheimer (Oxford University Press) Lying isn't necessary, useful or even possible most of the time.
    A False Flag 9/11 would require total mastery of US government, intelligence security, police, and most crucially the army, which could always stage a coup. It just isn't that easy to be make a selfish penguin conspiracy work. A nation state is not as sophisticated as a bunch on penguins.

    Sorry I engaged you. I forgot you are an idiot after all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @L.K
    It takes an idiot, like you, to recognize another fucking idiot, like sean.

    Both of you are also pathetic liars and trolls.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jonathan Revusky

    But bizarrely George Washington High School, per your 75th Anniversary Link, contends she did attend their school even though she’s not listed in the Yearbook.
     
    Well, actually, to be precise, the 75th anniversary event would be organized by the alumni association, I suppose, not the school administration specifically. That is why it's a separate website.

    But, look, the origin of the wager was that it was competely inconceivable to Ron Unz that the story would not check out. To the extent that he told me I was wasting my time to even bother.

    So, if Ron Unz reasons this way, it stands to reason that the people who set up that website likely reason the same way. It was so widely reported that Betty Ong graduated from George Washington High School in 1974 that they never checked!

    The fundamental problem here is that the Ronnie Unz reasoning in question is flawed. The repetition of a story does not make it true! That was what, in final analysis, the wager was about.

    So you can't just start going on saying that these people are repeating the story, therefore the story must be true, because that is precisely the proposition that is under dispute! Can't you see that?


    Perhaps George Washington High School can provide copies of her Original Transcripts since she isn’t shown in the Yearbook.
     
    Well, I didn't have a wager with Ron Unz about any transcripts, just about the yearbook.

    Maybe you can make a wager with him on this. (I'm personally tired of the whole thing so I leave it to you.)

    However, if Unz makes a separate wager with you on the transcripts, I would like him to pay me off on this wager on the yearbook first.

    I’m not disputing the verity or specifics of the Wager. I’m genuinely interested in this and in getting to the bottom of it. The Wager part of it, for me at least, is non-essential. For you, yes, I realize, $10,000 is nothing to sneeze at and it’s also a matter of principle. I understand, but I have no dog in that fight.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
    Cold N. Holefield commented:
    "The Wager part of it, for me at least, is non-essential. For you, yes, I realize, $10,000 is nothing to sneeze at and it’s also a matter of principle."

    Hi Cold N. Holefield,

    Agreed, above, and thanks for writing such practical sense!

    Ideally, Jon Revusky's article was written for a principled purpose.

    I trust J.R. did the work as a result of having made a choice between the forces of enlightenment & truth versus those of endarkenment & lies.

    For me, on the bright side, the anecdotal Unz / Revusky "wager" proliferates comments, but I'd like to see both scholarly men "pool" what is now apparent about the Phantom of The Flight 11 Opera, Betty Ong.

    P.S.:
    Terrific literary "screen name" pun, Cold N. Holefield! Thanks!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    That's the logical and rational view.

    But EU is also worshiped by some - middle-class and educated - Western demographics as a new religion.

    Even in the UK, it was very divided, the society, on this question - and the end result of the voting was within a couple of percent.

    And the UK - is the country in the EU, with the lowest approval ratings for the EU.

    In addition, I would worry that younger generations are very brainwashed into this religion.

    This is much more amongst people like Spanish. When I was learning Spanish, I used read sometimes the Spanish newspaper websites - and they publish many irrational and emotional articles saying how wonderful the EU is (it is a very accepted viewpoint there).

    The young quite like the prospect of being able to work, travel, study and live without restriction in a polity of half a billion people. How they live their lives and spend their time predisposes them to favour the EU.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Sean
    Revusky would need to have put up his own money for there to be an actual wager. The bet never really existed at all except in his narrative. Bad Betty.

    Revusky would need to have put up his own money for there to be an actual wager.

    My side of the wager was to put in the work to verify this.

    At various times, Ron stated that he was 99.99% certain that all the details about Betty Ong’s life would check out, i.e. nothing to see here. Okay, the 99.99% could just be a figure of speech, but if you do take that literally, that means that a bet of $10,000 against one dollar would be statistically a “fair bet”. And one dollar, to all intents and purposes, is just nothing.

    In any case, I certainly did a lot more than one dollar’s worth of effort to put the information here together!

    The bet never really existed at all except in his narrative.

    Well, although Ron has been quite a dick about this whole thing, he never attempted to deny, either in private or in public, that the wager existed.

    Now, if Ron now wants to change his position (even though I have private emails over the last couple of weeks where Ron clearly accepts there was a wager) and say there never really was a wager, it was all in jest or whatever, then he would have to show up and say so.

    There are all these clowns (you’re not the only one) who act as if Ron appointed them to be his advocate! This is ridiculous!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Hyperborean
    Just because the people selling their country to the highest bidder only care about getting the highest price doesn't mean ordinary Georgians don't resent it.

    Considering how even in full-pozzed London I've heard ordinary people complain about all the foreign oligarchs buying up everything, I don't find it hard to believe that Georgians might find it painful.

    Outside of a few ritzy neighborhoods which would have been out of reach of the ordinary locals going back decades, foreign oligarchs have not been buying that much property in London. Low interest rates are the primary reason prices have skyrocketed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hyperborean
    Well that's what I hear from people there. Although, you are right that the perception and actual cause of the problem are not necessarily the same.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mitleser

    It came from the investment in capital/technology.
     
    That and very favorable geography which includes cheap water and soil.

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/usa_great.jpg

    And all those waterways connecting to the world ocean. Almost free transport.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Polish Perspective

    I understand we needed foreigners to run the show
     
    There's a significant difference between taking in selective FDI in key industries and outright letting "foreigners run the show". East Asia and especially China did the former. Are you sure you are a nationalist?

    but please don’t turn this into a morality play of how they are supposed to “subsidize” us.
     
    My argument is much simpler. The West gains more from the East once you consider all three factors: public funds, private funds and labour movement. In the debate, we only hear about the first. We never hear about the last two.

    Therefore, the solution I prefer is clean and simple: we stop receiving public funds(literal pay-off money) and they stop getting free labour+monopolistic access to our domestic market. Don't forget that 75% of our EU funds are re-invested in Western European companies.

    The thing is, the West knows this. Günther Öttinger, who is in charge of cohesion funds has all but admitted this. There's a quote I'm too lazy to google where he says in half-jest that if anything the EU should pay EE countries more. But instead of that, my preferred option would achieve a far cleaner break. However, the West would also never agree to it, precisely because they know the real scorecard, which is why their threats of cutting EU funds during the asylum crisis was always a hoax.

    It's interesting, but perhaps not surprising, that Eastern Europeans like yourself have completely and whoolly swallowed the "you should be grateful" meme, while warning about "morality tales" when you aren't advocating for your own colonisation of "letting foreigners running the show".

    I doubt most Poles would be keen to ditch the opportunity of making German wages out of some sort of nationalistic amour propre.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thorfinnsson
    Low domestic gas prices are only a problem if it results in production dropping below domestic demand, with demand substituted by imports.

    Obviously this will not happen since the imports themselves would be LNG, excluding Canadian imports which are benign (and Canada doesn't have enough reserves to replace American producers in bulk).

    Increased gas production to satisfy export demand will simply result in us running out of gas reserves sooner at the expensive of a smaller heavy industrial production base.

    In the long-term I'm also skeptical of the viability of LNG in any case. With the development of OBOR and Russia's own efforts it's inevitable that FSU and Persian Gulf gas will be delivered to East Asia by pipeline.

    It's also worth pointing out that according to the US Energy Information Agency that China presently has the world's largest reserves of technically recoverable shale gas. Exploitation is a problem owing to distance from water resources and a lack of technological expertise.

    These are surmountable problems as proven by America's fracking industry. Both the Eagle Ford and Bakken formations are in dry areas not very close to fresh water, and the fracking industry didn't even exist at the turn of the century. Dick Cheney promoted invading Iraq because his energy working group predicted that by this time America would be importing 90% of its oil consumption.

    Meanwhile larger and more competitive industries in chemicals, steel, fertilizer, plastics, cement, etc. add more final value and represent a greater overall level of product complexity and technical efficiency. As most of these products are themselves intermediate input goods they'll increase the competitiveness of our final goods industries as well.

    Another possible use of our gas supremacy is in our world class freight railroad system. Currently this system is diesel-based. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad (a Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary) is currently experimenting with gas-powered locomotives.

    China (and Asia in general) are going to be severely water-stressed over the next few decades.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @Harold Smith
    "I honestly don’t know who in the US should get the credit for doing the right thing, but that person(s) deserves our collective gratitude. Rumors say that Mattis was the man, others point to Dunford and some even to Trump himself (I doubt that). Again, I don’t know who did it, but this action deserves a standing ovation."

    I believe the decision to scale back the missile attack on Syria was made by Orange Clown's jewish-supremacist handlers themselves. As I see it, Orange Clown and the "people" around him are nothing but props. The whole Orange Clown administration is pure political theater, IMO.

    I think the reason Bolton was appointed (and the reason Mattis has not been fired), is because the juxtaposition of the two – on either side of the arbitrary and capricious Orange Clown – gives our gamesmen maximum propagandistic flexibility in their psyop against humanity.

    When a bellicose Trump makes threats, we're to take it that he’s merely channeling Bolton. Then the gamesmen observe the response of the "system", and they’re free to appropriately follow up with anything on the spectrum from bloodthirsty psychopath (Bolton) to that of a somewhat more reasonable bastard (Mattis).

    I think this Bolton/Mattis dialectic is exemplified with the strike against Syria. Orange Clown was ordered by his handlers to marshal the naval strike group and make the necessary threats, i.e., to provide the stimulus, then the gamesmen studied the Russian response. And when the Russians put their ships to sea and the Russian Airborne Command Center took to flight or whatever, they assessed that Russia would respond militarily. Apparently not yet willing to start WW3, they had the flexibility to take a step back and attribute it to the influence of Mattis, thus limiting the loss of face.

    Anyway, the big picture here, as I see it, is that Orange Clown and his handlers are faced with the same problem that Obama and his handlers had: All the low-hanging fruit has already been picked. And any attempt to pick the fruit hanging at a higher level, e.g. Syria, is associated with some very serious risks.

    In the confusion that reigned immediately after Orange Clown’s inauguration, the opportunistic Orange Clown was able to quickly prop a ladder up against the tree, and start climbing (something that Hillary Clinton wouldn’t have been able to do). Despite Orange Clown's affectatious posturing, it has now become clear that Orange Clown intended to pick the fruit himself (of course for his handlers), rather than spray the insects threatening the fruit, as he had disingenuously intimated.

    So here we are now at a stalemate, albeit a very dangerous one, with Vladimir Putin trying to avoid a nuclear war (but already backed into a corner and ready to fight if forced), and Orange Clown’s handlers working day and night, interminably probing and pushing the limits, trying to come up with their next move.

    Perhaps the next "click" will be some kind of catastrophic false-flag attack?

    Perhaps the next “click” will be some kind of catastrophic false-flag attack?

    To be “catastrophic” means that Russia gets false-flagged, not Syria or Iran. It could happen. The Zionists want “regime change” with the destruction of Syria and Iran, and they’re not going to get it while the Russians remain in the area .

    False-flags need time, preparation and co-ordination, and a clue might be the current intense anti-Russian propaganda. Modern day Zionist false-flags always seem to start with a preparatory media barrage against the target, and there’s no doubt that Russia is getting the treatment.

    They could sink a US Navy ship to get their war, but what would the subsequent US assault look like? and with what kind of Russian response? It’s given that the US can’t fight a ground war in Syria and Iran, and it’s navy and air force are too exposed to modern weapons, so as Saker suggests it could quickly develop into a Middle East nuclear war.

    This would give Israel/US/Saudi Arabia their victory, with the bet that Russia would pull back from a full inter-continental nuclear engagement given that only Syrian and Iranian targets are hit with nuclear weapons.

    However, if the fated bullet happened to be in that fated chamber, the Russians would decide to get it over with, and flatten Israel, New York, Washington, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, the Pentagon, Langley etc. with a few thousand warheads to spare.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    It’s given that the US can’t fight a ground war in Syria and Iran, and it’s navy and air force are too exposed to modern weapons....
     
    Wishful thinking.

    US can fight those ground wars and the other side is more exposed to modern weapons.
    Much more.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Seamus Day

    A conservative Scottish pastor at a Baptist Church I visited, credibly summed up the purpose of war, more accurately than Augustine:

    “The purpose of war is to take what belongs to someone else.”
     

    Bullshit. The cost of most of our recent wars is orders of magnitude more than could ever be taken from these countries. That’s why the ‘war for oil’ slogan of the left is so stupid. We spent trillions in Iraq. You don’t spend trillions for oil.

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.

    The biological purpose of war is to kill off ignorant, violent people and those who value themselves so little that they willing to risk their lives follow orders from literally anyone with a dollar in their pocket.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[201] • Disclaimer says:
    @gsjackson
    I go to baseball games regularly at the local university, and whenever a member of the U.S. military is identified as being in the audience he stands on the home dugout and receives a rousing two-minute standing ovation from virtually ever one of the roughly 3,500 souls assembled. It is beyond bizarre, especially for someone who was on campus during Vietnam. And quite scary.

    I go to baseball games regularly at the local university, and whenever a member of the U.S. military is identified as being in the audience he stands on the home dugout and receives a rousing two-minute standing ovation from virtually ever one of the roughly 3,500 souls assembled. It is beyond bizarre, especially for someone who was on campus during Vietnam. And quite scary.

    My dad, who is a WWII veteran in his 90’s, saw heavy combat and received a Purple Heart and still has shrapnel in him from a Japanese grenade. He hates to be thanked for his service and never stands in church on Veterans Day weekend when they ask for veterans to stand. He thinks this glorification of people who “served” is total ludicrous and they should not get any benefits or preference for it. He said no one ever mentioned being in the war, and especially not simply being in the military, when he was younger.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Tyrion 2
    If there's a girl who looks the same, graduated at the same time, cannot be identified as a different person, has the same English first name and has the same Chinese surname then she surely is the same whatever small and understandable typo may have been made in a student produced yearbook.

    Until Revusky discounts this perfectly sensible set of inferences he cannot be said to have won the bet. A one letter transliteration mistake is hum drum. All of the conspiracy freaks keep ignoring this...I assume because they have no answer to it.

    Revusky would need to have put up his own money for there to be an actual wager. The bet never really existed at all except in his narrative. Bad Betty.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    Revusky would need to have put up his own money for there to be an actual wager.
     
    My side of the wager was to put in the work to verify this.

    At various times, Ron stated that he was 99.99% certain that all the details about Betty Ong's life would check out, i.e. nothing to see here. Okay, the 99.99% could just be a figure of speech, but if you do take that literally, that means that a bet of $10,000 against one dollar would be statistically a "fair bet". And one dollar, to all intents and purposes, is just nothing.

    In any case, I certainly did a lot more than one dollar's worth of effort to put the information here together!

    The bet never really existed at all except in his narrative.
     
    Well, although Ron has been quite a dick about this whole thing, he never attempted to deny, either in private or in public, that the wager existed.

    Now, if Ron now wants to change his position (even though I have private emails over the last couple of weeks where Ron clearly accepts there was a wager) and say there never really was a wager, it was all in jest or whatever, then he would have to show up and say so.

    There are all these clowns (you're not the only one) who act as if Ron appointed them to be his advocate! This is ridiculous!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cold N. Holefield

    Anyway, I am not the one who claims that Betty Ong went to this school. (I kinda doubt it frankly.) I’m just checking a fact that appeared in a lot of different places in the MSM. And Ron’s wager, of course, was based on the idea that Ronnie can’t conceive of such a widely reported “fact” not being so! So he never thought his $10,000 was at any real risk! (Think again, Ronnie…)
     
    But bizarrely George Washington High School, per your 75th Anniversary Link, contends she did attend their school even though she's not listed in the Yearbook. Perhaps George Washington High School can provide copies of her Original Transcripts since she isn't shown in the Yearbook.

    What is it with the Chinese and these Terrorist Spectacle Events? Dun Meng's claim he was carjacked by the alleged Boston Bombers is also a bizarre story. And then we have the steel from the World Trade Center site being quickly disposed of to a Chinese Company, Baosteel. At least they were smart enough not to sell it to an Israeli Company. That would have been a bit too audacious, I suppose.

    Mangled WTC Steel Bought By China

    On a lighter note, nobody names their daughters Betty anymore. Or Barbara. Thank goodness.

    But bizarrely George Washington High School, per your 75th Anniversary Link, contends she did attend their school even though she’s not listed in the Yearbook.

    Well, actually, to be precise, the 75th anniversary event would be organized by the alumni association, I suppose, not the school administration specifically. That is why it’s a separate website.

    But, look, the origin of the wager was that it was competely inconceivable to Ron Unz that the story would not check out. To the extent that he told me I was wasting my time to even bother.

    So, if Ron Unz reasons this way, it stands to reason that the people who set up that website likely reason the same way. It was so widely reported that Betty Ong graduated from George Washington High School in 1974 that they never checked!

    The fundamental problem here is that the Ronnie Unz reasoning in question is flawed. The repetition of a story does not make it true! That was what, in final analysis, the wager was about.

    So you can’t just start going on saying that these people are repeating the story, therefore the story must be true, because that is precisely the proposition that is under dispute! Can’t you see that?

    Perhaps George Washington High School can provide copies of her Original Transcripts since she isn’t shown in the Yearbook.

    Well, I didn’t have a wager with Ron Unz about any transcripts, just about the yearbook.

    Maybe you can make a wager with him on this. (I’m personally tired of the whole thing so I leave it to you.)

    However, if Unz makes a separate wager with you on the transcripts, I would like him to pay me off on this wager on the yearbook first.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cold N. Holefield
    I'm not disputing the verity or specifics of the Wager. I'm genuinely interested in this and in getting to the bottom of it. The Wager part of it, for me at least, is non-essential. For you, yes, I realize, $10,000 is nothing to sneeze at and it's also a matter of principle. I understand, but I have no dog in that fight.
    , @Anon
    Speaking of that site, further examination yields oddities in sfgenealogy. Several people on that site are clearly misidentified or misspelled: Mark O'Neill has become Mark O'Niel, for instance. Lisa Look, who pays tribute to Betty Ong on the sign-in page, identifies herself as graduating in '75 but is listed as graduating in '76. So I don't think other errors are unlikely.

    You did make a plausible enough case to intrigue me enough to make me waste several hours of my life (which is probably about what you spent), I'll give you that, but if that's all ...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @utu

    I don’t know anything “FOR SURE” and neither do you. No one in this world does because no one may have absolute verification of data, no matter how loudly and persistently they call for it.
     
    This is true. Nevertheless some narratives are considered more true, more known, more factual than others. Truth in this context is merely a rhetorical device. Who poses the truth wins. But in fact it is the other way around: who wins poses the truth.

    According to Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying In International Politics by John J. Mearsheimer (Oxford University Press) Lying isn’t necessary, useful or even possible most of the time.
    A False Flag 9/11 would require total mastery of US government, intelligence security, police, and most crucially the army, which could always stage a coup. It just isn’t that easy to be make a selfish penguin conspiracy work. A nation state is not as sophisticated as a bunch on penguins.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    Sorry I engaged you. I forgot you are an idiot after all.
    , @Jonathan Revusky

    A False Flag 9/11 would require total mastery of US government, intelligence security, police, ....
     
    This reflects such confused, warped thinking. Let's try to unravel this a bit... Think about this question:

    If a political faction did have total mastery over every power center in the country, why would they need to execute a False Flag psy-op in the first place?

    I mean, just think about that a bit.

    You see, there are various proven false flags in history, like the Mukden incident where the Japs had a "terrorist attack" on their own railway somewhere in Manchuria, I think. But the point of the false flag is that the faction that wants to get the country further into the situation in China, they execute the operation to make their case for the policy they want.

    If the faction behind the false flag already had total mastery over every power center, then they just do WTF they want! They don't need the false flag in the first place!

    Aside from the proven false flags, like that one, there are almost certain false flags, like the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana Harbor. And so on...

    But the reason for the false flag is that there is a political faction that wants whatever policy (typically some war of aggression that will be presented as not being a war of aggression) and to get that policy, they execute this psy-op to pave the way for the policy they want that would otherwise be politically impossible, typically because most people do not want that policy, they don't want the wars etc....

    So, the war party that executes the false flag does so precisely because they do not have total control.

    Okay, that's enough on your plate for now. The above is just like Deep Politics 101. Just think about it.

    , @daniel le mouche
    I apologize for my earlier comment where I thought we were in agreement.
    Oxford University? They couldn't POSSIBLY be in on it, could they?? THEM, INSIDERS??
    And that was quite a gem,
    'A nation state is not as sophisticated as a bunch of penguins.'
    I'm beginning to think you are indeed yourself a penguin, and good for you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Cold N. Holefield
    You doubt JR AND you doubt George Washington High School? I don't understand your stance or argument if you have one.

    JR has provided a link where George Washington High School heralds Betty Ong as their most Distinguished Alumnus. Are they lying? If they are, why would they lie about something like this? Are they mistaken? If they're mistaken, how the hell could they be about something like this? I would think they'd verify it before heralding it, don't you?

    Unless that link JR provided is bogus. I don't know how to verify its authenticity though. Does anyone?

    JR has provided a link where George Washington High School heralds Betty Ong as their most Distinguished Alumnus.

    Well, they don’t say that explicitly. The main page of that site, specifically for the celebration of the school’s 75th anniversary, has Betty up top. She is in a higher position than the actor Danny Glover, or Maya Angelou, or the singer Johnny Mathis, whose photos appear lower down on the page. That is here:

    http://www.gwhs75thanniversary.com/

    Unless that link JR provided is bogus.

    Dude, the above site is something I just found in a search. It is a website related to the celebration of the 75th anniversary of that school. 1936-2011. It never crossed my mind that it was anything other than what it represents itself as, because it is beyond my comprehension that anybody would create such an elaborate hoax just for the pure heck of it!

    Do you seriously think there is much possibility that that site is fraudulent?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cold N. Holefield

    Dude, the above site is something I just found in a search. It is a website related to the celebration of the 75th anniversary of that school. 1936-2011. It never crossed my mind that it was anything other than what it represents itself as, because it is beyond my comprehension that anybody would create such an elaborate hoax just for the pure heck of it!

    Do you seriously think there is much possibility that that site is fraudulent?
     
    Dude, chill. I'm not saying you made the website up. No, I don't seriously think the site is fraudulent.

    You're making a leap yourself by claiming those responsible for the 75th anniversary site heralded Betty as a prominent alumnus based off of the news stories. You don't know that. Maybe they did, or maybe they didn't.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @peterAUS

    This means that Russia is fighting a defensive war and the West the war of aggression, which by definition makes Russia right and the West wrong.
     
    Some people don't equate the regime in Kremlin with Russia.

    For the Russians “the turf”, as you put it, is our own country and we do defend it.
     
    Nobody was attacking Russia last time (5 minutes ago) I checked.
    Last time it happened '41. At least you people are fond of regurgitating that all the time.

    That we do not know.
     
    Some of us do. We also aren't bad in history either. Like remembering USSR expansion into Europe.We simply don't like to see another.
    "Do not trust Moscow". Short and simple. Keyword "trust".

    We made our positions clear.
    Let's move on.

    Some people don’t equate the regime in Kremlin with Russia.

    This is not any “regime”; this is a government of Russia supported by more than 70% of the people. And if anybody is entitled to “remove” people in Kremlin, that would be citizens of Russia at the time and in the manner they see fit, and no one else. Whoever those “some people” are and what they think is of no consequence.

    Nobody was attacking Russia last time (5 minutes ago) I checked.

    Russia is under attack, albeit not yet with missiles. In case you missed that, economic sanctions is a form of warfare. The only reason missiles aren’t flying is that Russia can and will fight back, and you know it. And you aren’t good at fighting with an able adversary.

    Some of us do. We also aren’t bad in history either.

    You claim to be a psychic able to see the future? I sincerely doubt it. And you are pathetic in history, if you mean the real one, not the history you invented to suit your delusion of grandeur. USSR “expansion into Europe”, indeed! You conveniently forget that it followed a very bloody “expansion” of Europe into the USSR, my friend.

    We made our positions clear.

    Your position has always been abundantly clear. Pity it just doesn’t matter that much any more.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • Anon[198] • Disclaimer says:
    @peterAUS

    The purpose of all wars, is peace.
     
    No.
    "War is the continuation of politics by other means."

    War is evil. Large-scale, state-sanctioned violence is justified only when all other means of achieving genuinely essential objectives have been exhausted or are otherwise unavailable. A nation should go to war only when it has to — and even then, ending the conflict as expeditiously as possible should be an imperative.
     
    Shallow and superficial.

    With the basics so wrong the rest is pointless.
    Feels good, though. A good starting point for online therapy.I"ll pass.

    No.
    “War is the continuation of politics by other means.”

    You and the author simplify a bit; here is some context; you can find more context if you care.

    As, then, there may be life without pain, while there cannot be pain without some kind of life, so there may be peace without war, but there cannot be war without some kind of peace, because war supposes the existence of some natures to wage it, and these natures cannot exist without peace of one kind or other.

    I’ve noticed you absent from Revusky’s last thread; probably a wise decision on your part. But your input would be interesting if you have any (no need to read the piece in its entirety or more than the first few comments).

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Nice.
    Agree, of course.
    Didn't want to go that path on this site. Tried a couple of times and, let's say that the level of misunderstanding was staggering.
    Getting phylosophical, or even deep into human very makeup, well, this isn't the place.

    ...because war supposes the existence of some natures to wage it, and these natures cannot exist without peace of one kind or other.
     
    I'll say just one thing.
    I had my own war. Apparently, it was really a very bad one, by everybody's account.
    I just know one thing: I never felt so alive then and there. Nothing compares. Nothing......
    All elements of life itself were on the level I've never felt after that. The scent of air, intensity of sounds, taste of food and drinks, sleep, rest, comradeship, well...everything was 100 %. Nothing in civilian life compares. Nothing. Well, one thing only, actually.Won't say what.
    Crazy a?
    Or....hehe.....poor civilians, "chattering class" in particular.

    If we want to get analytical now, the same applies to groups. A couple of mates, together, in war. A small community...larger community.....etc....etc.
    Anyway.


    I’ve noticed you absent from Revusky’s last thread; probably a wise decision on your part. But your input would be interesting if you have any (no need to read the piece in its entirety or more than the first few comments).
     
    Read some of the article, skimmed through some parts. Read some comments; got surprised by, say, "internal workings" of this site. Too much personal bullshit and politics if you ask me.
    As for the topic itself, well, got that video about Pentagon plane, so here I am:
    Before reading some stuff on this site (thank you guys, a couple only, of course) I thought one thing.
    Now I am inclined to think otherwise.
    Two things:
    I buy, 70/30 that the buildings, all of three of them, did collapse due to a peculiar combination of how they were built with how and with what they were hit, plus the rest. So, no demolitions.
    Second, Pentagon plane. That video, well....so, again, I believe that a plane (the plane) hit Pentagon.

    Now, did the government know that hijacking was going to happen, I am sure some parts of the intelligence community/security apparatus did. Was it intentionally not prevented, don't think so. I go with incompetence and organizational culture there.

    That the event was manipulated and used for the Deep State goals, of course.
    I am sure that as soon some of them knew what was happening they started calculating and acting.
    Having said all this, I really don't want to get into debate about that. I mean...done around zillion times already.

    One more thing.
    Mentioned my little war. So, can't get emotionally involved into 9/11. What Americans see as a terrible thing re loss of life, limb and property, guys like me see "and.....?".
    I am widely known as Russia hater here. So.. this
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beslan_school_siege
    is, in my book, worse than 9/11.
    Much worse.
    And, to add insult to the injury, only this


    2004

    In September 2004, following bombing attacks on two aircraft and the downtown Moscow Metro, Chechen terrorists seized over 1,000 hostages at a school in Beslan, North Ossetia.
     

    is on the Wikipedia site re "Terrorism in Russia". Not even a fucking link.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • @Heros
    Like the Yankee coward he is, Lang hightailed it out of the Unz comment section back to the safety of his own blog where he promptly bans and/or abuses anyone who he disagrees with. This is typical Yankee behavior, cowardly running away and then crowing about victory once they are certain their opponents can no longer reach them.

    http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2018/04/commenter-delusions.html#disqus_thread

    Lang lightly addresses a few comments in this post from the safety of his own blog, but he ignores the stinky pile of elephant dung following him where ever he goes: War Crimes.

    Every year they seem to drag up another poor conscripted German labor camp guard, who as a teenager in 1945 is still somehow guilty of war crimes now. These guys weren't even officers.

    Lang was in intelligence during Vietnam, when operation Pheonix was in force, which was the equivalent to the Nazi Einsatzgruppen. As the years have passed and the lies have slowly been pealed back about things like Tonkin and the secret bombings, it becomes clear to all non-Yankees that these were egregious war crimes and crimes against humanity. If we consider the complete aftermath of Pol Pot and the fall of Vietnam, the US army has more deaths and crimes to atone for than the German army did, without even considering what has gone on in the middle east since the US recognized Israel, a "country" with no official borders.

    The problem is that there are millions of Yankee war criminals in the US collecting pensions, getting paid for appearances on talk shows, and basking in all that gratitude for their service. Even worse, they form little clubs, like SST, where they pat each other on the back and exchange tidbits of war criminal manna. I am referring to "intelligence".

    This entire Comey/McCabe/Muller/Clinton kubuki theatre that we are forced to endure revolves around "classified" information. Information that only these insiders are allowed to know about, which is clearly sold and leaked at will by those at the top of the food chain. This is the military war criminal manna. They can use and profit from this secret knowledge for decades after they have left "service".

    In Lang's case, he can post juicy tidbits on his blog that he shares with other insider Yankee war criminals and know that the public will come to learn these great secrets, despite the abuse he heaps on anyone who questions anything they are told because of his deep insider knowledge.

    So now that we finally know what a sham all this "top secret" information is, I would propose that it be used a the criteria for determining war crimes when the US finally faces judgment on the misery she has created for humanity. Low level security clearance means a couple of very hungry years in a re-education camp. High level security clearance means testicle crushing to extract forced confessions.

    Whew! Thanks for the link. I’d like to claim the title of “more zany commenter” for coining the phrase ‘corpses in his closet’ … but that honor goes to bjondo. ["In addition to corpses in his closet, wonder how much looted Russian loot in his off-shore account(s)?"]

    Trouble is, bjondo and I were referring to Jeffrey Sachs. Pat Lang must believe every comment under his article is about him. Sad. One can only hope he reads his “top secret” “classified” information more carefully.

    Meanwhile, he chose not to respond to my genuine concern. Why is he entitled (if he did) to castigate Larry Wilkerson…[pot calling kettle].? Why should Lang be forgiven, Wilkerson not? And BTW, Lang seems to have no remorse, so why forgive him at all?

    As for the rest of his “Commenter Delusions” you’re quite right, Heros. Seems the man won’t tolerate to hear any other view than precisely his own.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Kafka
    Great article. This piece by a guest author on the Saker blog makes a good addition to this piece. It puts the issue in a moral context:

    http://thesaker.is/ask-yourselves-are-we-the-bad-guys/

    It is an excellent article, but please, don’t sully it with The Saker.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • Anonymous[954] • Disclaimer says:
    @Heros
    Like the Yankee coward he is, Lang hightailed it out of the Unz comment section back to the safety of his own blog where he promptly bans and/or abuses anyone who he disagrees with. This is typical Yankee behavior, cowardly running away and then crowing about victory once they are certain their opponents can no longer reach them.

    http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2018/04/commenter-delusions.html#disqus_thread

    Lang lightly addresses a few comments in this post from the safety of his own blog, but he ignores the stinky pile of elephant dung following him where ever he goes: War Crimes.

    Every year they seem to drag up another poor conscripted German labor camp guard, who as a teenager in 1945 is still somehow guilty of war crimes now. These guys weren't even officers.

    Lang was in intelligence during Vietnam, when operation Pheonix was in force, which was the equivalent to the Nazi Einsatzgruppen. As the years have passed and the lies have slowly been pealed back about things like Tonkin and the secret bombings, it becomes clear to all non-Yankees that these were egregious war crimes and crimes against humanity. If we consider the complete aftermath of Pol Pot and the fall of Vietnam, the US army has more deaths and crimes to atone for than the German army did, without even considering what has gone on in the middle east since the US recognized Israel, a "country" with no official borders.

    The problem is that there are millions of Yankee war criminals in the US collecting pensions, getting paid for appearances on talk shows, and basking in all that gratitude for their service. Even worse, they form little clubs, like SST, where they pat each other on the back and exchange tidbits of war criminal manna. I am referring to "intelligence".

    This entire Comey/McCabe/Muller/Clinton kubuki theatre that we are forced to endure revolves around "classified" information. Information that only these insiders are allowed to know about, which is clearly sold and leaked at will by those at the top of the food chain. This is the military war criminal manna. They can use and profit from this secret knowledge for decades after they have left "service".

    In Lang's case, he can post juicy tidbits on his blog that he shares with other insider Yankee war criminals and know that the public will come to learn these great secrets, despite the abuse he heaps on anyone who questions anything they are told because of his deep insider knowledge.

    So now that we finally know what a sham all this "top secret" information is, I would propose that it be used a the criteria for determining war crimes when the US finally faces judgment on the misery she has created for humanity. Low level security clearance means a couple of very hungry years in a re-education camp. High level security clearance means testicle crushing to extract forced confessions.

    Lang hightailed it out of the Unz comment section back to the safety of his own blog where he promptly bans and/or abuses anyone who he disagrees with.

    Not before making an ass of himself in this comment section.

    His loss. That’s why unz.com is growing and the colonel’s blog is a tiny circle-jerk, like a thousand other circle-jerks on the WWW. The supply-demand ratio is not in his favour. Ah, well…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @utu

    However, he really ought to pay off on this wager to me first.
     
    No he should not. You must get a hard copies of yearbooks. The digital copy can be altered by people like you. It is possible you did tin order to swindle Ron Unz. I am not saying you did it but it is possible. He clearly stated (presuming that what you cite indeed came from his email) that you should spend $500 or so and get the hard copy. You did not because you are a lazy bum. You kept talking about Betty Ong for years and did nothing to verify it until you got somewhat motivated by the prospect of the $10k. Still not motivated enough to do something really substantial. You are a lazy bum who never really cared for what you professed. Your talk is cheap like almost everybody on internet on both sides of the 9/11 debate.

    No he should not. You must get a hard copies of yearbooks

    Utu, did Ron Unz appoint you as his advocate? If Ron Unz wants to argue that the only way to settle the question is with a hard copy, let him show up and make the argument. But there is no point in arguing with you!

    The digital copy can be altered by people like you.

    No, it can’t. The digital copy is up there on the classmates.com site. I have no way of altering it. (Maybe somebody else has the means to alter that, but NOT ME!)

    You’re just talking shit and obviously doing so out of personal hostility towards me. Be hostile towards me, fine, but find some legitimate arguments if you can. Don’t just start picking up random shit and flinging it at me like a monkey. (Though, okay, I suppose you can’t help it, it’s in your nature…)

    It is possible you did tin order to swindle Ron Unz.

    Well, it’s not possible because I cannot alter the version on the classmates.com website. Anybody can sign up for an account there and peruse the yearbooks. The graphics in the article are just screenshots I took when doing so. Anybody can do that. When I sent Unz the email outlining what I had found out, I gave him the URL’s to do so but pointed out that you need to sign in with a (free) account to do that. That’s all. But it’s easy to do so. Actually, here is the URL for the page with “Black Betty” on it.

    http://www.classmates.com/siteui/yearbooks/4182821566?page=157&searchTerm=betty&yearbookViewerEnabled=true&swipeEnabled=true

    But if you don’t have an account, it redirects you to a login page and you need to sign up for an account. You do that and log in and try that URL and you’ll see. But you would know that if you weren’t such a pathetic bullshitter, because you would have gone through those steps.

    And the whole idea that I have some project of swindling Unz is preposterous! What is this? The classic swindle where you induce somebody to wager $10,000 that somebody is in a yearbook??!!

    Sure, that’s a classic confidence trick, up there with selling people swamp land in Florida!

    He clearly stated (presuming that what you cite indeed came from his email) that you should spend $500 or so and get the hard copy.

    That is basically nonsense. Ron was just thinking out loud about how I could get my hands on a yearbook, that’s all. There was no requirement that I spend $500 to get one! Like, suppose I was in Frisco and happened on the yearbook in a box of old junk at a garage sale and somebody sold it to me for $1. Are you saying that this would be no good because there was a requirement for me to spend $500 on the yearbook?

    This is just all such nonsense. And even if it were not such nonsense, it would be a waste of time to argue with you or anybody else here who is NOT Ron Unz! Unz did not appoint you as his advocate! If he wants to show up and argue that he did not lose the wager because of blah blah blah, then let him show up and argue the case. And if he declines to do that, then he has OBVIOUSLY conceded the wager. The wager was about whether this person, the Betty Ong who made the phone call on 9/11, the Chinese flight attendant, is in the yearbook. She clearly is NOT!

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu

    That is basically nonsense. Ron was just thinking out loud about how I could get my hands on a yearbook, that’s all. There was no requirement that I spend $500 to get one!
     
    Are you for real? Do you really believe there was a formal bet and now it is you who can interpret what ever was written in emails between you and RU to your advantage? I still thought a bit (not much but a tiny bit) more about you thinking that perhaps you are interested in finding some facts about Betty Ong but it looks like you just want the money because RU happened to inadvertently utter the amount of $10k and actually you believe that you deserve it. What a chutzpah!

    Ron Unz definitively should not pay you anything, though as I wrote earlier it would be nice if he hired a PI to investigate existence of Betty Ong. And definitively he should not engage in personal communication with you. Nobody should.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Inspectors from the Organization for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) have finally arrived in Douma, Syria, to assess whether a gas attack took place earlier this month. It has taken a week for the inspectors to begin their work, as charges were thrown back and forth about who was causing the delay.Proponents of the...
  • Jimmy Dore shows what happened there:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Anon[198] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    the lazy bum Revusky
     
    Utu, you pathetic dumbass... by your logic, if you took your car to a mechanic specifically for an oil change, and he did just that, changed the oil, he would be a "lazy bum" because he did not take the opportunity to rebuild your car's engine!

    The wager with Unz was specifically about whether Betty Ong was in the appropriate high school yearbook. To say that I'm lazy because I resolved that question and didn't go further makes no sense really.

    Now, granted, as the scriptures say, out of the mouths of dumbasses can come words of wisdom, so you do make a valid point about hiring a private investigator. Assuming one really did want to resolve the Betty Ong question thoroughly, I guess that is what one would do -- as opposed to insisting that I, somebody who is not any sort of professional investigator, do it.

    So, yes, I would be perfectly happy if Ron hired a PI to do just that. However, he really ought to pay off on this wager to me first.

    The wager with Unz was specifically about whether Betty Ong was in the appropriate high school yearbook. To say that I’m lazy because I resolved that question and didn’t go further makes no sense really.

    You didn’t resolve the question. Do you see why not?

    I guess that is what one would do — as opposed to insisting that I, somebody who is not any sort of professional investigator, do it.

    You wrote a 4100 word article about something. It seems you are interested in, again, something. But what? If you wanted to cover your “wager” (is it a wager– heads I win, tails we forget the whole thing?) you could do it in one sentence: “I looked at an online copy of the GWHS San Fran. yearbook and there is no Betty Ong though there is a Betty Ng whom I believe to be someone else”. What was purpose of other 4069 words? To convince someone of something?

    But okay, you’re not going to do it. That’s okay. But why get so het up about it? This I don’t understand. Just “Thanks but I’m not interested in pursuing the matter further” would do.

    Then you could get on to more important things, possibly including your next article which would further the goal of the other 4000-word part of this article.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Anon
    LOL this guy wants us to treat the OHCHR seriously. I bet he thinks the Canadian CHRC is also a legitimate body we should all defer to.

    "we can talk turkey." OK let's. Your irrelevant and (frankly insulting to our intelligence) commentary spoken as some UN plutocrat treating the US and Haiti as equal with equal standards is about as dumb as the gentleman above who wants us to think "half the US population has hispanic roots" or that we never "USA diversity never made room for the native americans".

    Your slimy globalism is showing, Pooftareader, no matter how many times you try to use expressions like "Arab headchoppers" to try, in your wormy manner, to fit in with how you think dissident nationalists talk.

    So. The fact that the USA fails to meet the standards applied to Haiti and every other country means… What, that the USA deserves special eeeasy American self-esteeeem standards? “Here’s your gold sticker, Jimmy, everybody’s a winner in the the Special Yooman Rights Olympics!!” Face it, your police state stuffed your helpless masses down a shithole.

    Globalism…? Get it straight, globalism is different than the old-school Eastern seaboard internationalism you just encountered, which upsets you so.

    What exactly is your hardon for the OHCHR? They put your government on the spot in a way that your media doesn’t dare do, that your legislature doesn’t dare do, that your civil society doesn’t dare do. They’ve got more balls than your entire subject population. You obviously need their help, since you can’t escape your patriotic icecreamhole.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    Did you know that there are entire towns and HOAs that aren’t even on google maps? They are mostly very wealthy neighborhoods that don’t want burglars and kidnappers using google maps to target the residents for burglary and kidnapping.

    Over the years I have noticed that every time someone posts that he or she was there that day and saw the crash and the towers come down you claim the event never happened and that you have figured out it was all a gigantic fraud using the internet and google maps.

    Use google maps to check out lower manhattan the east river and Brooklyn. Manhattan and the WTC can easily be seen from much of Brooklyn.

    Thousands of people in New Jersey looked across the Hudson and saw the whole thing that day.

    If you check google maps you will see that thousands could see the whole thing

    You don’t seem to realize that maps and google maps are horizontal and flat.

    But in reality buildings are vertical. The WTC was the tallest building in New York.

    All people had to do was just look up instead of straight ahead and they could see the WTC. Didn’t they teach you that in the Air Force? I believe it’s called elevation

    Ever been to Chicago? The Sears Tower was once the tallest building in the world. It can be seen from all over downtown just by looking up at the sky and there it is.

    If I look straight ahead or down I can’t see the high rises in the Century City business district a few miles away.

    But all I have to do is look up to the sky and there they are.

    I can’t see the mountains about 15 miles to the north when I am looking straight ahead or down.

    But all I have to do is lift my head and look up and there they are.

    You were in the Air Force? Jeez how low can the standards go.

    You don’t seem to realize that maps and google maps are horizontal [sic] and flat.

    It’s amazing the BS you can read on the Internet peddled by morons posing as experts.

    Doofus anon[257] doesn’t know diddley about maps or Google either one, including the fact that there is a 3D layer in Google Earth, and also street view in Google Maps.

    Google Earth now uses an auto 3D scanning technology to produce 3D representations of buildings and other large features, trying even for trees with raggy results, but when the 3D layer was first introduced in 2009, all the buildings were modeled by hand primarily using the SketchUp 3D modeling application. I know because I did this kid of work at the time, and several of my building models were on Google Earth until the auto-scanning technology was introduced in 2012, and all the hand-built models were retired to the 3D warehouse.

    The new 3D technology has the advantage that everything is modeled, where with the old system, if an artist didn’t model the building and upload it to the 3D warehouse, and get it approved by Google Earth, it didn’t appear on the 3D layer. All the 3D stuff had to be done by hand, where now it can be done automatically with 3D scanning, although not every area has it yet.

    In short, you’re completely wrong. Again.

    You were in the Air Force? Jeez how low can the standards go.

    You just talk trash, and shoot yourself in the foot when you try to denigrate my service. In fact, the USAF has high enlistment requirements, and I was in an elite Air Force command. Crème de la crème was the way they put it, and we had nothing but top-notch people of the highest caliber, which is why it gets so dreary talking with a ignoramus like you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Polish Perspective

    Poland, for example, receives around twice as much free money or aid from the EU, than the entire world UN annual budget. I guess Poland might be the most aid receiving country in the world? (I wonder if anyone has done calculations of this topic?)

     

    https://i.imgur.com/yNvMzzD.jpg

    Poland isn't even in the top 5 once you adjust for GNI. It's true that Poland gets most in absolute terms, but that's also because we are way bigger than most EE countries. I find a lot of economic innumerate to fail to understand this point and just repeat "yes but they get THIS MANY BILLIONS". But without adjusting for economic size is meaningless. Sad to see that you are not smarter than this, Dmitry.

    Also, this is counted from the year 2000. The latest EU funds flow constitute about 1% of our GNI according to our central bank. The next one will be half that, even if no change is done, simply on account of a growing economy and a closer realignment to the EU median.

    Furthermore, whenever we are talking about EU funds this should be kept in mind:

    https://i.imgur.com/YNiPO03.png

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge ("see, it's only thanks to us because of us generous we are!"). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.

    You can see this in sector after sector. Take retail. A German goes to shop in Aldi, Lidl or Kaufmann. All domestic firms. Poles and Czechs shop at the same stores, with Carrefour thrown into the mix. As you can see from the chart, the most drained country of us all is Czechia. No wonder euroskepticism is high there.

    And I haven't even talked about the fact that Western European countries benefit massively from labour and we lose, in some instances permanently.


    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge (“see, it’s only thanks to us because of us generous we are!”). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.

    You are correct, but the chart doesn’t show that. It’s quite misleading.

    In only compares the net inflow of EU transfers to the net outflow of capital income.

    Other inflows include:

    • FDI (FDI into Poland for 2016 was around 3% of GDP it appears–more than EU transfers)
    • Exports
    • Foreign portfolio investment (i.e. investment into a business short of direct control, as well as bond purchases)
    • Bank lending
    • Repatriated foreign earnings and debt repayments

    Other outflows include:

    • Outbound FDI
    • Imports
    • Outbound foreign portfolio investment
    • Outbound bank lending
    • Foreign aid

    In theory the capital (FDI, portfolio investment, lending) and current accounts (trade, debt service, repatriated earnings) must always balance, though in reality this isn’t always true (see the Eurodollar market for instance).

    Depending on what EU funds are actually used for they could represent a very good deal in that EU funds do not represent FDI, portfolio investment, or lending and thus involve no obligation to service foreign debt or send capital income to foreign investors. Knowing the EU I doubt the funds are used for anything useful but you would know better.

    In general outside of East Asia fast-growing and/or converging economies run current account deficits in order to grow faster. Norway for instance ran a current account deficit of 13% of GDP while it was getting its North Sea oil industry off the ground.

    If you want to avoid that you have to suppress consumption and increase domestic saving, hence the famously high household savings rate in China (and Japan until recently). Or you accept slower growth. Inbound FDI also makes it easier to acquire foreign technology and know-how.

    A good way to split the difference is through joint ventures and forced technology transfers.

    You can see this in sector after sector. Take retail. A German goes to shop in Aldi, Lidl or Kaufmann. All domestic firms. Poles and Czechs shop at the same stores, with Carrefour thrown into the mix. As you can see from the chart, the most drained country of us all is Czechia. No wonder euroskepticism is high there.

    Sure, but ALDI, Lidl, Kaufmann, and Carrefour doubtless have higher productivity and better merchandising skills than anything that existed in the Visegrad 4 or could’ve come to the fore in the post-communist period.

    As a result Visegrad people exchange lost profits for lower prices, better quality, and improved product selection.

    Of course you can argue that efficient retailers would’ve developed anyway, but this surely would’ve taken more time.

    The real question is whether the Visegrad 4 can create successful multinational corporations or if they will forever be comprador economies controlled by the German 1%. There are worse fates than that incidentally. Australia and Canada have been a comprador economies from day one for instance.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Walmart is said close to $12 billion-plus deal for Flipkart

    Why should you care? Because if this deal goes through, a major Indian giant in the making will be snuffed out. We need more competition among the tech giants away from the US-controlled dogma.

    I had earlier speculated about the far more Westernised Indian elites and how that plays badly into a divergence path – as compared to Chinese elites who are far more rooted in their own country. If you look at India’s digital landscape, virtually nothing is different from a typical Western country in terms of what tech they use.

    The irony here is that Snapdeal(an also-ran) and Flipkart were both loudly talking about imposing capital rules which would have meant that foreign investors can invest but they can’t get controlling interest. Something similar was mulled in China after Naspers got a big stake in several Chinese companies, but those companies remained in Chinese hands even with a lot of foreign capital. This may now not happen in India.

    The NDA – the ruling Indian coalition with the BJP as its head – exposed the lie of them being any different than the Congress – the previous rulers, who are dynastic in Indian politics – when it refused these proposed rules.

    I actually read the BJP 2014 manifesto all those years ago and was excited when they mentioned a break with Western dogma. Sadly it was all fluff. They have maintained a neoliberal line and they don’t seem to understand the importance of your own domestic tech sector. India is one of the very few countries which can pull it off. I’ve argued before that in order to get Big Tech you need a Big Market first.

    So India is throwing this away, if the deal is completed. This on the heels of Indian elites embracing SJW trends like feminism with gusto in a way that doesn’t appear to be happening in China to even nearly the same extent. Of course, Polish elites are of low quality, but our excuse is that given our precarious position and our far smaller economy, it was inevitable that we were going to end up in someone’s orbit. India is big enough to chart its own course far more independently but the tragedy is that it seems completely unwilling or even incapable of doing that.

    So only China will truly challenge the US dominance in all fields. India seems intent on playing the supplicant. Russia is the only other major country which stands up to the US and for that it needs our thanks, especially in foreign policy. If even the Indian “nationalists” won’t do this, there’s no hope for the opposition. Then again, the Congress has actually run a more independent foreign policy than the BJP, interestingly enough. Especially when it comes to regime change etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • Anonymous[954] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vojkan
    Neocons would be neocons with or without Israel. The tribal aspect is undisputable, there are overlapping interests, but the goals are different. For neocons, as for Soros progressives who are also far from being all Zionists, it's global domination, for Zionists, it's Greater Israel, which does btw encompass more land than just the mythical Eretz Israel.
    Obviously, the neocons' God complex has a lot to do with being "the chosen people" and obviously their rise to prominence wouldn't have been possible without help from fellow "chosen people" so it's not such a bad idea to root for Israel, but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn't help at all achieve the Zionists' goals. The latter don't put all their eggs in one basket, and they do in fact have a lot of activity in the back of their American protector but if the USA goes down, the neocons / Soros liberals are gone too.
    In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel - though they'd have to find other ways to pominence than Zionist money -, they're both phenomenons of the same tribe but one can be contained and can be made to accomodate itself with that containment, the others represent a real threat to Planet Earth. The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.

    It’s a package deal. If they take out Russia, global domination is virtually assured and Israel will get the World’s crown sooner or later. At the heart of it there’s a messianic lunacy and that’s why we’re facing WW3 at, say, 90% probability.

    Read More
    • Replies: @gwynedd1
    I saw this in the brochure:

    Refuge for the Jews..
    Guard the flank of the Suez for the British..
    Western capitalist power against the Arab Soviet back Socialists for the cold warriors..
    Democracy in the Middle East for Americans..
    Jesus is coming soon for the Evangelicals ..
    Access to oil for the Investment bankers ..

    Something in it for everyone, yay.
    , @Vojkan
    If they take out Russia, Russia will take out Israel so Israel will be a dead king. The Zionists should better reign in the neocons if they want there to be an Israel.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    That 37 minutes estimate is only valid from 1 to 5 am.

    And you don’t know her address in Chinatown. It involves a lot more than just the Geary bus

    That 37 minutes estimate is only valid from 1 to 5 am.

    Wow, you just lie pretty smoothly and automatically, eh? Well, you’re not a very good liar though. Maybe you should take some time to think about your lies first. I said specifically that the route was using public transportation. The last #1 bus runs at 1:15 a.m. and resumes at 4:40 a.m. So your 1 to 5 a.m. window is almost exactly when that route does NOT work, because the buses aren’t running then. See:

    https://www.sfmta.com/routes/1-california

    In fact, the the 37 minute estimate from Google Maps on the bus ride was for about 8 a.m. I also note from this page I link above that the frequency of the buses at that time is every 6 minutes. So the commute looks quite feasible. Granted, I don’t know whether the bus schedule was the same back in Betty’s day, but I don’t see much reason to think it was very different.

    But you see, again, you guys just assume that I’m a bullshitter like you. But I’m not. If I check something like this, I check it.

    And you don’t know her address in Chinatown.

    Well, no, I don’t know her exact address in Chinatown. I don’t think you do either. Well, frankly, I have serious doubts whether there is an exact address, since I have great doubts about the whole story of these people!

    I doubt the exact starting address makes that much difference because the Chinatown area is pretty compact really. I took the Golden Gate Fortune Cookie Factory as a starting point because it’s a major tourist landmark in that area. If the bus ride is 37 minutes, the commute is completely feasible. That it takes a few minutes more or less to walk to the bus stop and back would not matter very much.

    But none of this matters anyway. I am saying the above as somebody who doesn’t even believe that any of these people really attended that school. But that would not be because it is infeasible to commute from the Chinatown area to that school! It obviously is feasible.

    Well, assuming one exists, it’s feasible. If you don’t exist, then that is kind of a first order problem…

    Well, on third thought, if Betty didn’t exist, then the commute is probably even more feasible because then she could probably get away with not paying the bus fare!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • Anonymous[954] • Disclaimer says:
    @geokat62

    I think it far from absurd to make the distinction between neocons and Zionists, since neocons will certainly not disappear even if Israel disappeared.
     
    Nice try. Neocons, like most liberal Jews, were originally leftists who crossed over the political divide because they realized, especially after witnessing The Left's resistance to the Vietnam War, progressivism would lead to a non-interventionist US foreign policy, spelling disaster for the Jewish state. In other words, Israel is the neocons raison d'être... without it, they would rejoin most of their brethren who reside on the left of the political spectrum. If you require proof of this, just look at how the neocons easily switched over to the Democrats and HC during the 2016 presidential campaign, when Trump promised to end the regime-change wars. That's because the only thing conservative about the neoconservatives is their support for a more hawkish foreign policy, for the benefit of the Jewish state.

    Very good post.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    Thanks
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • During the bombing of Baghdad in January 1991 I went with other journalists on a government-organised trip to what they claimed was the remains of a baby milk plant at Abu Ghraib which the US had just destroyed, saying that it was really a biological warfare facility. Walking around the wreckage, I found a smashed-up...
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @annamaria
    The US-style “democracy on the march” in Poland, the obedient vassal of the ZUSA: https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/04/breaking-polish-political-prisoner-mateusz-piskorski-to-be-charged-with-espionage-for-russia/
    “The Polish National Prosecutor’s Office has issued an indictment against the famous scholar, anti-NATO activist, and leader of the political party Zmiana, Dr. Mateusz Piskorski.
    The full case and details of the indictment remain classified… The National Council of ZMIANA calls for the immediate declassification of the indictment against the Chairman of ZMIANA, Dr. Mateusz Pisorski: “ We believe that this whole affair is unprecedented in the recent history of Poland and is evidence of a lack of freedom of speech and freedom of political beliefs in the Republic evermore often referred to as “NATO’s Eastern Flank” as if the only meaning of our Fatherland’s existence is protecting the interests of the United States." …
    Dr. Mateusz Piskorski has repeatedly warned against the dangers of a Third World War breaking out over NATO expansion in Eastern Europe and Poland’s degradation into a potential battlefield. …
    Piskorski has been dubbed contemporary Poland’s first political prisoner, and his indictment for alleged espionage behind closed doors could usher in a new era of political repression in NATO-occupied European countries…”
    -- There is no available information on the weasel Edward Zalewski, a current National Public Prosecutor, who produced the indictment

    Thanks for the information. I was wondering what happened to Dr. Pisorski after he was arrested more than a years ago, I think, on ridiculous charges of spying for Russia, and I believe China (!) was also mentioned. As ridiculous as it gets.

    Frankly, the development of the Polish political system towards a totalitarian repressive regime doesn’t surprise me in the least. A rabidly nationalistic stance with extreme hostility towards any deviation from the official viewpoint in the interpretation of the historic or political events was to lead to repressions – this was inevitable.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SteveM

    Frankly, the development of the Polish political system towards a totalitarian repressive regime doesn’t surprise me in the least.
     
    The Poles are no more "totalitarian" and "repressive" than the Russians. They have an open society with free elections. They are nationalists fully aware of their history with Moscow. Painting the Poles as crypto-fascists is insulting and condescending. Floating that kind of bile only aggravates the relationship between the two countries/cultures.

    I'm not saying that the Poles' interpretation of current Russian foreign policy is accurate. But it's up to the Poles and Russians to collectively work that out over time.

    The MASSIVE impediment to a productive and peaceful rapprochement between Poland and Russia is the Global Cop Gorilla in Washington that loves to stir the pot of conflict for its own ego's sake.

    P.S. I'm thinking the catalyst for improved relations between Poland and Russia would be visible exchanges between the Polish Catholic Primate and the Russian Orthodox Patriarch. Being brothers in Christ in what is largely a Post-Christian Europe should transcend political boundaries.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @reiner Tor

    foreigners run the show
     
    I used it in the context of cell phone providers, where at least two decades ago there could have been some need for economies of scale. I’m not wholly sure.

    In general I think my comment wasn’t clear enough, I mostly agreed with you. E.g. the “morality tale” referred to the supposed western “subsidies” which we lazy Easterners supposedly receive.

    Anyway, now there are some points you made which I actually disagree with.

    we stop receiving public funds(literal pay-off money) and they stop getting free labour+monopolistic access to our domestic market.
     
    It’s impossible. Our educated elites (and even the not so educated unwashed masses) actively want the ability to choose to go to work in Western Europe. Short of Eastern Bloc style border fences and criminalization of emigration, how can you prevent the West (actually, the western elites) from taking advantage of your labor force?

    And short of capital controls and full scale nationalization, how can you prevent the profit repatriations?

    So the EU funds will be cut, unless the V4 can somehow show some force, but it’s unclear how. Cutting those funds is actually popular in Germany, I’m sure.

    Our educated elites (and even the not so educated unwashed masses) actively want the ability to choose to go to work in Western Europe.

    You can’t stop braindrain. On that we agree. But you certainly can stop the great masses. We certainly didn’t see the kind of flood we saw post-2004 before and that is entirely by design.

    And short of capital controls and full scale nationalization, how can you prevent the profit repatriations?

    Capital controls may not be a hugely bad thing. China still maintain them. It’s important here to distinguish between FPI (foreign portfolio investments) and FDI. It’s the latter which you want, and even then I’d say that only some types of FDI is actually beneficial, and only if it is directed towards genuine productive and technological capacity. As for full scale nationalisation, it isn’t feasible today nor would it even be preferable even if it was.

    I don’t think the state should be running retail stores. I do think that we have enough domestic firms to do a good job today. Given that we can’t wrest control out of foreign ownership hands, we can at least tax them appropriately given their massively monopolistic position. However this has been blocked by Brussels at every turn. In an environment where modest EU funds get cut even more, I don’t see why we should restrain ourselves despite massive Brussels screeching on this.

    So the EU funds will be cut, unless the V4 can somehow show some force, but it’s unclear how. Cutting those funds is actually popular in Germany, I’m sure.

    On an annual basis, Germany contributes around 0.1% of GNI. It’s a rounding-error. I don’t think the general public actually cares much, and I also don’t think the general public which cares even understands how little Germany pays.

    That said, none of this changes my stated position: the best outcome would not only be cutting EU funds but completely eliminating them – in exchange for ending Schengen and ending monopolistic market dominance. The latter two will never be accepted by the West because those are the two areas where they are draining the Eastern part of Europe. This is also why we never hear about them in the debate, because it doesn’t the fit the narrative of “we’re subsiding the poor EEs”.

    The best outcome is rarely the most realistic outcome, but I honestly think less EU funds will be good for us in the long term. At any rate, the current EU funds is about 1% of GNI according to our central bank and it has halved for each funding cycle. This is what successful convergence is supposed to mean. So us losing EU funds will not be a huge blow at any rate and it will free up political capital to go after areas which causes a lot of butthurt in Brussels in the economic sphere. It will also make us even more immune to blackmail on 3rd world quotas.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @RadicalCenter
    The Glendale-Burbank-LA Area, quite often.

    The Census Bureau has it that there are 63,000 Armenian-born people in the 4 counties around LA. Not bad for a circumscribed area, but not a horde either.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • how smart are Armenians?

    Armenia blows but all the Armenians in the diaspora are geniuses. And you can’t just say that all the smart Armenians left because Armenia does well in all the chess olympiads and kicked the shit out of the much bigger Azjerkoffistan or whatever it’s called in their war.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • If there’s a girl who looks the same, graduated at the same time, cannot be identified as a different person, has the same English first name and has the same Chinese surname then she surely is the same whatever small and understandable typo may have been made in a student produced yearbook.

    Until Revusky discounts this perfectly sensible set of inferences he cannot be said to have won the bet. A one letter transliteration mistake is hum drum. All of the conspiracy freaks keep ignoring this…I assume because they have no answer to it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    Revusky would need to have put up his own money for there to be an actual wager. The bet never really existed at all except in his narrative. Bad Betty.
    , @anonymous
    looks the same, graduated at the same time, cannot be identified as a different person

    My thoughts exactly. She look very similar to me, although I will freely admit that my judgment in this regard may be off. Maybe it wasn't even a typo. Maybe it was entered in the yearbook that way for some very trivial, as of yet unknown reason. Maybe the different spelling is actually a conspiracy in itself. I don't know what the answer is, and I don't know that anyone has ever even looked into it.

    I just find it amazing that other commenters here are suggesting that the idea that her name may have been spelled slightly differently in some old yearbook (for whatever reason) is ludicrous, crazy, outlandish nonsense that is completely outside the realm of possibility, while the simpler and more likely conclusion is that she never really existed, and is in reality part of a huge, highly elaborate, multilayered conspiracy involving dozens, possibly hundreds of people. All of the people in on the conspiracy are perfectly fine with being complicit in the murder of thousands of innocent Americans for unexplained reasons. Not a single one of these people ever comes forward. Ever.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @utu

    One Bonesman Bush pres to set up Saddam and another to topple him. Could have been a long term plan.
     
    I am pretty sure that if Bush Sr. went all the way the planners would be happy. For some reason he did not go and so he paid the price for it by not getting the second term. The planners or the TPTB were not too happy with Bush Sr., who riding on the highest approval ratings (90%) after the war decided to confront and challenge Yitzhak Shamir but then lost his nerve and instead of turning to American people backed off. Bush Sr. seemed to be very reluctant to go to war and it was only after his meeting with Margaret Thatcher in Aspen, Colorado that the decision to go to war was announced.

    For some reason he did not go and so he paid the price for it by not getting the second term.

    George Herbert Walker Bush, Bush Sr., was at the center of The Deep State for a very long time. As such, The Deep State then wasn’t as Psychotically Insane as it is now. Psychopathic, for sure, but not yet Psychopathically Insane.

    Listen to Cheney in ’94 about the reasons for not going all the way to Baghdad. It’s the one time I have ever agreed with Cheney. This one time. He was right. And then 10 years later he went off his Meds and went against his own sound advice and threw America head-first into The Middle East Quagmire.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Anatoly Karlin

    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?
     
    Correct, though only true for the sovok generation.

    Georgian restaurants in the USSR played the role of French restaurants in the US, as the elite place to go to place for status signalling purposes. Only French cuisine really is world class, whereas Georgian cuisine isn't (same for the wines). Now that there are mid-range Georgian establishments, the older Soviet people like to frequent them, since they continue to regard them as prestigious, even though there are no end of much cheaper (and better) restaurants and eateries.

    For the Moscow yuppies I think it's more about Georgia's (admittedly not entirely fictive) success at larping as a "European" country. This allows them to status signal how European and progressive they are.

    Georgian restaurants in the USSR played the role of French restaurants in the US, as the elite place to go to place for status signalling purposes.

    They did? I can’t recall a single one in my home town, where live 600,000 people and (at one time) the world headquarters of several major corporations.

    Only French cuisine really is world class, w

    “World class”? What does that even mean? Are you referring to quality, snob appeal, or something else?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Polish Perspective
    Eurostat is out with numbers on book reading. Curious trivia.

    https://jodi.graphics/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/People-reading-books.png

    France looks curiously low. And share is not the same as time spent. Here's that:

    https://jodi.graphics/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Time-spent-reading-books.png

    So France continues to underperform. Very strange. Finally a map:

    https://jodi.graphics/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Share-of-people-reading-books-2016-Eurostat-Jo-Di-graphics_.png

    Unfortunately the mapmaker is retarded. It isn't the "share of people" but "time spent" that is being highlighted. I was positively surprised by Greece and to some extent even Turkey. Outside of France I'd say the biggest negative outlier is Austria.

    https://jodi.graphics/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Expenditure-on-books.png

    Though if you look at expenditure on newspapers, books etc, both the French and the Austrians do decently well. Maybe they just buy more expensive books which are more intellectual but read less? Or maybe their newspapers are high-brow enough that less of book-reading is needed.

    I'd be interested in the quality of books rather than just time spent on books. Someone reading Harry Potter, 50 shades of grey and a ton of chick-lit isn't on the same level as someone reading a few major intellectual tomes per year. But I guess that would be too "elitist", or maybe hard to measure.

    France is no longer a European country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Heres the North Tower, watch the corner of the building exploding outward, a good 5 stories below the collapsing top.
    You can also see the ejections occurring much lower from random windows, easily 10 stories below the top.
    How does a floor explode, before the top even reaches it?

    Controlled Demolition is the only way these building could have been brought down. No way fires could take out all of the supporting columns at the EXACT same time to bring Building 7 down into its own footprint. Watch carefully, you can see the windows shattering as the charges go off, right before it falls the charges go off in a perfectly straight line, that is how the columns are taken out in a demolition, fires do not do this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace.

    No.
    “War is the continuation of politics by other means.”

    War is evil. Large-scale, state-sanctioned violence is justified only when all other means of achieving genuinely essential objectives have been exhausted or are otherwise unavailable. A nation should go to war only when it has to — and even then, ending the conflict as expeditiously as possible should be an imperative.

    Shallow and superficial.

    With the basics so wrong the rest is pointless.
    Feels good, though. A good starting point for online therapy.I”ll pass.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon

    No.
    “War is the continuation of politics by other means.”
     
    You and the author simplify a bit; here is some context; you can find more context if you care.

    As, then, there may be life without pain, while there cannot be pain without some kind of life, so there may be peace without war, but there cannot be war without some kind of peace, because war supposes the existence of some natures to wage it, and these natures cannot exist without peace of one kind or other.
     
    I've noticed you absent from Revusky's last thread; probably a wise decision on your part. But your input would be interesting if you have any (no need to read the piece in its entirety or more than the first few comments).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • With slight disappointment the public regarded the field. Just a minute ago, two knights were converging in fearsome joust, their spears pointing forth, plumage blowing, horses galloping, ladies out waving their handkerchiefs to their champions, - and now we see they have passed each other, both firmly in the saddle, plumage unruffled, spears unbloodied, horses...
  • @Thirdeye
    Hey fool,

    If you don't understand velocity, ascent angle (approximate), and time by now you never will. It doesn't matter how you try to puff yourself up by pontificating about elementary trigonometry.

    Still no answer from you about the hit rate on cruise missiles by 1960s-70s systems during the Kosovo war.

    Toodles

    Don’t bother debating with FB. He is a Mr. Know All, regards himself as the final depository of all knowledge and wisdom, loutishly rude for no reason, and given to hurling insults and abuse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Polish Perspective

    I understand we needed foreigners to run the show
     
    There's a significant difference between taking in selective FDI in key industries and outright letting "foreigners run the show". East Asia and especially China did the former. Are you sure you are a nationalist?

    but please don’t turn this into a morality play of how they are supposed to “subsidize” us.
     
    My argument is much simpler. The West gains more from the East once you consider all three factors: public funds, private funds and labour movement. In the debate, we only hear about the first. We never hear about the last two.

    Therefore, the solution I prefer is clean and simple: we stop receiving public funds(literal pay-off money) and they stop getting free labour+monopolistic access to our domestic market. Don't forget that 75% of our EU funds are re-invested in Western European companies.

    The thing is, the West knows this. Günther Öttinger, who is in charge of cohesion funds has all but admitted this. There's a quote I'm too lazy to google where he says in half-jest that if anything the EU should pay EE countries more. But instead of that, my preferred option would achieve a far cleaner break. However, the West would also never agree to it, precisely because they know the real scorecard, which is why their threats of cutting EU funds during the asylum crisis was always a hoax.

    It's interesting, but perhaps not surprising, that Eastern Europeans like yourself have completely and whoolly swallowed the "you should be grateful" meme, while warning about "morality tales" when you aren't advocating for your own colonisation of "letting foreigners running the show".

    foreigners run the show

    I used it in the context of cell phone providers, where at least two decades ago there could have been some need for economies of scale. I’m not wholly sure.

    In general I think my comment wasn’t clear enough, I mostly agreed with you. E.g. the “morality tale” referred to the supposed western “subsidies” which we lazy Easterners supposedly receive.

    Anyway, now there are some points you made which I actually disagree with.

    we stop receiving public funds(literal pay-off money) and they stop getting free labour+monopolistic access to our domestic market.

    It’s impossible. Our educated elites (and even the not so educated unwashed masses) actively want the ability to choose to go to work in Western Europe. Short of Eastern Bloc style border fences and criminalization of emigration, how can you prevent the West (actually, the western elites) from taking advantage of your labor force?

    And short of capital controls and full scale nationalization, how can you prevent the profit repatriations?

    So the EU funds will be cut, unless the V4 can somehow show some force, but it’s unclear how. Cutting those funds is actually popular in Germany, I’m sure.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Polish Perspective

    Our educated elites (and even the not so educated unwashed masses) actively want the ability to choose to go to work in Western Europe.
     
    You can't stop braindrain. On that we agree. But you certainly can stop the great masses. We certainly didn't see the kind of flood we saw post-2004 before and that is entirely by design.

    And short of capital controls and full scale nationalization, how can you prevent the profit repatriations?
     
    Capital controls may not be a hugely bad thing. China still maintain them. It's important here to distinguish between FPI (foreign portfolio investments) and FDI. It's the latter which you want, and even then I'd say that only some types of FDI is actually beneficial, and only if it is directed towards genuine productive and technological capacity. As for full scale nationalisation, it isn't feasible today nor would it even be preferable even if it was.

    I don't think the state should be running retail stores. I do think that we have enough domestic firms to do a good job today. Given that we can't wrest control out of foreign ownership hands, we can at least tax them appropriately given their massively monopolistic position. However this has been blocked by Brussels at every turn. In an environment where modest EU funds get cut even more, I don't see why we should restrain ourselves despite massive Brussels screeching on this.

    So the EU funds will be cut, unless the V4 can somehow show some force, but it’s unclear how. Cutting those funds is actually popular in Germany, I’m sure.
     
    On an annual basis, Germany contributes around 0.1% of GNI. It's a rounding-error. I don't think the general public actually cares much, and I also don't think the general public which cares even understands how little Germany pays.

    That said, none of this changes my stated position: the best outcome would not only be cutting EU funds but completely eliminating them - in exchange for ending Schengen and ending monopolistic market dominance. The latter two will never be accepted by the West because those are the two areas where they are draining the Eastern part of Europe. This is also why we never hear about them in the debate, because it doesn't the fit the narrative of "we're subsiding the poor EEs".

    The best outcome is rarely the most realistic outcome, but I honestly think less EU funds will be good for us in the long term. At any rate, the current EU funds is about 1% of GNI according to our central bank and it has halved for each funding cycle. This is what successful convergence is supposed to mean. So us losing EU funds will not be a huge blow at any rate and it will free up political capital to go after areas which causes a lot of butthurt in Brussels in the economic sphere. It will also make us even more immune to blackmail on 3rd world quotas.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Jonathan Revusky

    the lazy bum Revusky
     
    Utu, you pathetic dumbass... by your logic, if you took your car to a mechanic specifically for an oil change, and he did just that, changed the oil, he would be a "lazy bum" because he did not take the opportunity to rebuild your car's engine!

    The wager with Unz was specifically about whether Betty Ong was in the appropriate high school yearbook. To say that I'm lazy because I resolved that question and didn't go further makes no sense really.

    Now, granted, as the scriptures say, out of the mouths of dumbasses can come words of wisdom, so you do make a valid point about hiring a private investigator. Assuming one really did want to resolve the Betty Ong question thoroughly, I guess that is what one would do -- as opposed to insisting that I, somebody who is not any sort of professional investigator, do it.

    So, yes, I would be perfectly happy if Ron hired a PI to do just that. However, he really ought to pay off on this wager to me first.

    However, he really ought to pay off on this wager to me first.

    No he should not. You must get a hard copies of yearbooks. The digital copy can be altered by people like you. It is possible you did tin order to swindle Ron Unz. I am not saying you did it but it is possible. He clearly stated (presuming that what you cite indeed came from his email) that you should spend $500 or so and get the hard copy. You did not because you are a lazy bum. You kept talking about Betty Ong for years and did nothing to verify it until you got somewhat motivated by the prospect of the $10k. Still not motivated enough to do something really substantial. You are a lazy bum who never really cared for what you professed. Your talk is cheap like almost everybody on internet on both sides of the 9/11 debate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    No he should not. You must get a hard copies of yearbooks
     
    Utu, did Ron Unz appoint you as his advocate? If Ron Unz wants to argue that the only way to settle the question is with a hard copy, let him show up and make the argument. But there is no point in arguing with you!

    The digital copy can be altered by people like you.
     
    No, it can't. The digital copy is up there on the classmates.com site. I have no way of altering it. (Maybe somebody else has the means to alter that, but NOT ME!)

    You're just talking shit and obviously doing so out of personal hostility towards me. Be hostile towards me, fine, but find some legitimate arguments if you can. Don't just start picking up random shit and flinging it at me like a monkey. (Though, okay, I suppose you can't help it, it's in your nature...)


    It is possible you did tin order to swindle Ron Unz.
     
    Well, it's not possible because I cannot alter the version on the classmates.com website. Anybody can sign up for an account there and peruse the yearbooks. The graphics in the article are just screenshots I took when doing so. Anybody can do that. When I sent Unz the email outlining what I had found out, I gave him the URL's to do so but pointed out that you need to sign in with a (free) account to do that. That's all. But it's easy to do so. Actually, here is the URL for the page with "Black Betty" on it.

    http://www.classmates.com/siteui/yearbooks/4182821566?page=157&searchTerm=betty&yearbookViewerEnabled=true&swipeEnabled=true

    But if you don't have an account, it redirects you to a login page and you need to sign up for an account. You do that and log in and try that URL and you'll see. But you would know that if you weren't such a pathetic bullshitter, because you would have gone through those steps.

    And the whole idea that I have some project of swindling Unz is preposterous! What is this? The classic swindle where you induce somebody to wager $10,000 that somebody is in a yearbook??!!

    Sure, that's a classic confidence trick, up there with selling people swamp land in Florida!


    He clearly stated (presuming that what you cite indeed came from his email) that you should spend $500 or so and get the hard copy.
     
    That is basically nonsense. Ron was just thinking out loud about how I could get my hands on a yearbook, that's all. There was no requirement that I spend $500 to get one! Like, suppose I was in Frisco and happened on the yearbook in a box of old junk at a garage sale and somebody sold it to me for $1. Are you saying that this would be no good because there was a requirement for me to spend $500 on the yearbook?

    This is just all such nonsense. And even if it were not such nonsense, it would be a waste of time to argue with you or anybody else here who is NOT Ron Unz! Unz did not appoint you as his advocate! If he wants to show up and argue that he did not lose the wager because of blah blah blah, then let him show up and argue the case. And if he declines to do that, then he has OBVIOUSLY conceded the wager. The wager was about whether this person, the Betty Ong who made the phone call on 9/11, the Chinese flight attendant, is in the yearbook. She clearly is NOT!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    The census will only track a fraction of emigrants/workers. You can see above that officials are not using it when estimating for this question.

    You mean they’ll find them once you’ve told them where to look.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    Couple days ago I posted that I’m going to San Francisco for the summer and I might go to Washington and try to get the yearbook.

    But now I doubt she went to Washington. 76 high schools in San Francisco Maybe Sparkon can use google maps to find the yearbook.

    You doubt JR AND you doubt George Washington High School? I don’t understand your stance or argument if you have one.

    JR has provided a link where George Washington High School heralds Betty Ong as their most Distinguished Alumnus. Are they lying? If they are, why would they lie about something like this? Are they mistaken? If they’re mistaken, how the hell could they be about something like this? I would think they’d verify it before heralding it, don’t you?

    Unless that link JR provided is bogus. I don’t know how to verify its authenticity though. Does anyone?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    JR has provided a link where George Washington High School heralds Betty Ong as their most Distinguished Alumnus.
     
    Well, they don't say that explicitly. The main page of that site, specifically for the celebration of the school's 75th anniversary, has Betty up top. She is in a higher position than the actor Danny Glover, or Maya Angelou, or the singer Johnny Mathis, whose photos appear lower down on the page. That is here:

    http://www.gwhs75thanniversary.com/

    Unless that link JR provided is bogus.
     
    Dude, the above site is something I just found in a search. It is a website related to the celebration of the 75th anniversary of that school. 1936-2011. It never crossed my mind that it was anything other than what it represents itself as, because it is beyond my comprehension that anybody would create such an elaborate hoax just for the pure heck of it!

    Do you seriously think there is much possibility that that site is fraudulent?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Polish Perspective

    FDI was 176 Billion in 2016. Polish GDP was 469 Billion.
     
    China gets around 100-120 billion USD per year in FDI. Who knew that Poland gets 50% more than China with less than 1/20th the population?

    Please, learn basic math first before opining. Your basic common sense should have kicked in long ago when you even typed that comment.

    My mistake. The figure I cited was probably FDI stock. FDI net inflows are much lower, of course. Actual figure is 16 billion.

    https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=PL

    Your basic common sense should have kicked in long ago when you even typed that comment.

    I stay corrected.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @EugeneGur

    Putin/Russia are fighting the “Anglo Zionist” empire because the same empire simply wishes to dispose of the regime in Kremlin and take over the country
     
    This means that Russia is fighting a defensive war and the West the war of aggression, which by definition makes Russia right and the West wrong.

    Two mobsters in a turf war.
     
    For the Russians "the turf", as you put it, is our own country and we do defend it. It's the oldest trick in the book - to equate the aggressor and the defender because they both use military means. In reality, there is only one mafia here, and it isn't Russia.

    should the empire goes down tomorrow, “Team Putin” will want to replace U.S. deep state in a second.
     
    That we do not know. The only thing we do know is what is going on right before our eyes: the US and the entire West behaving like a gangster disregarding any and every rule of civilized behavior and endangering everyone, and Russia acting as the only adult in the room. The rest is a transparent attempt to justify the West's behavior: the West isn't to blame, for"both sides are equally bad".

    This means that Russia is fighting a defensive war and the West the war of aggression, which by definition makes Russia right and the West wrong.

    Some people don’t equate the regime in Kremlin with Russia.

    For the Russians “the turf”, as you put it, is our own country and we do defend it.

    Nobody was attacking Russia last time (5 minutes ago) I checked.
    Last time it happened ’41. At least you people are fond of regurgitating that all the time.

    That we do not know.

    Some of us do. We also aren’t bad in history either. Like remembering USSR expansion into Europe.We simply don’t like to see another.
    “Do not trust Moscow”. Short and simple. Keyword “trust”.

    We made our positions clear.
    Let’s move on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @EugeneGur

    Some people don’t equate the regime in Kremlin with Russia.
     
    This is not any "regime"; this is a government of Russia supported by more than 70% of the people. And if anybody is entitled to "remove" people in Kremlin, that would be citizens of Russia at the time and in the manner they see fit, and no one else. Whoever those "some people" are and what they think is of no consequence.

    Nobody was attacking Russia last time (5 minutes ago) I checked.
     
    Russia is under attack, albeit not yet with missiles. In case you missed that, economic sanctions is a form of warfare. The only reason missiles aren't flying is that Russia can and will fight back, and you know it. And you aren't good at fighting with an able adversary.

    Some of us do. We also aren’t bad in history either.
     
    You claim to be a psychic able to see the future? I sincerely doubt it. And you are pathetic in history, if you mean the real one, not the history you invented to suit your delusion of grandeur. USSR "expansion into Europe", indeed! You conveniently forget that it followed a very bloody "expansion" of Europe into the USSR, my friend.

    We made our positions clear.
     
    Your position has always been abundantly clear. Pity it just doesn't matter that much any more.
    , @annamaria
    The "regime" -- and a theocratic one -- is in your beloved apartheid Jewish State. ("Israel does not have a written constitution," "the Israeli government gives special preference to Judaism," "Although Israel does not grant special privileges to any special Jewish group, many European Jews belong to higher social classes than Arabs and “Oriental” Jews").
    And who are these "we" in your mysterious "We made our positions clear" - the US ziocons?
    The ziocons had attacked Russian interests in Ukraine (which borders with Russia) and arranged the NATO military bae there. The coup d'etat was to the detriments of the majority of Ukrainian people, including Ukrainian Jews that have been enjoying the triumph of banderism in Kiev and beyond since then. Nothing pleasures the Kagans' clan more than a profitable cooperation with the followers of Bandera. "Lionized as a nationalist hero in Ukraine, Stepan Bandera was a Nazi sympathizer who left behind a horrific legacy," https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/09/stepan-bandera-nationalist-euromaidan-right-sector/
    The ziocons have been arming and providing with the logistics the "moderate" terrorists in the Middle East, where Russia has been defending her interests by the legitimate means, on the legitimate invitation from the legitimate Syrian government -- unlike the ziocon coalition of the US/NATO + Israel + the oh-so-democratic Saudis + the CIA-trained head-choppers and liver eaters.
    Russia is just another unfortunate country where the militant Jews wanted to get the upper hand for the expense of the natives. What your tribe has been commemorating for centuries during Purim? -- A mass slaughter of the native population provoked by the obnoxious Jewish guests. And this is what gives joy to your tribe: "Happy is the one who seizes your [Persian, Russian, German...] infants and dashes them against the rocks." Psalm 137:9
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Anon
    in the post-Cold War era when the relative strength of U.S. forces reached its zenith, our well-endowed, well-trained, well-equipped, and highly disciplined troops have proven unable to accomplish any of the core tasks to which they’ve been assigned. This has been especially true since 9/11.

    But this is false. US has militarily succeeded around the world in invasions and winning wars.
    But the military cannot build new systems. Its purpose is to destroy. Military can invade, military can bomb, military can kill. But it was not designed to heal and build. Sure, there are military engineers that are into logistics and etc. but military isn't meant to build anything permanent.

    So, US military fulfills its missions all over the world. It drops bombs, invades, kills people, and etc.
    It is very successful at all that. Now, if the US were to return after the battles or wars, no problem.
    But the US plan is to STAY,and that's where the problem comes in. The problem is not with the US military. It is with the post-military strategy, for which the military is ill-equipped to handle. It's not the military that is deciding to stay forever.

    Consider a doctor. A doctor can cut flesh and do stuff inside the body, BUT he cannot heal the patient. He can only set things right(like broken bones) or remove organs. Once he stitches the patient and removes his invasive presence from the organs of the patient, the healing must happen internally by the body itself. A doctor can only set bones together. For the bones to heal, an organic process must take place independent of the doctor. A doctor an remove an object from the body. But the healing has to be happen by natural processes of the body. So, a doctor can cut open a patient and invasively do stuff inside the body. But once his job is finished, he must stitch up the flesh and let the body heal itself.

    US military is the same way. It can invade and take out 'bad guys', but then, it must move out and allow the nation to heal and reorder itself by its own accord. But the US keeps the wound open. The surgery never ends. So, the body cannot heal by its own accord.

    Worse, US targets the wrong 'patients' for sickness. US relies on the Zionist quack to decide which nations are sick and need to be operated on. Obviously, the quack Zionist never says anything is wrong with Israel. Oh no. The sick puppies are Iran, Syria, Libya, Iraq, etc. or any nation hated by Jews.
    But, as the saying goes, "don't fix what isn't broken". It was US foreign policy and war-making that made those nations even worse. Also, the US intervention can make things much worse by removing the regulator. Assad's regime was the regulator that kept the balance of power and order in Syria. But US interferes and undermines the regulator and all hell breaks loose. It's like cutting upon a body and messing with the functioning of the heart or liver. The whole system begins to fall apart. US strategists and big thinkers are quacks or third-rate medical scientists. What they often identify as the disease turns out to be the crucial organ holding the nation together. Gaddafi's regime looked gross and sick(and it was), but despite its grotesqueness, it was the key organ/regulator that held the nation together. Imagine a doctor cutting open someone and taking out intestines as being 'full of shit'. So, will the patient be better since the shit-filled organ has been removed from the body? Of course not. As ugly as intestines are, they are crucial. And Gaddafi's regime was crucial in a desert nation of so many clans. And Assad is the necessary organ of Syria. Of course, the evil Zionist doctor knows this. But it calls for removal of or harm done to the organ because it wants to see a permanently crippled and sick Syria.

    Another thing. Bacevitch is wrong to focus on the military. I can understand why because he's a military historian.

    But the real power is not with the military. After all, if the US were all about military power and ambitions, then war with ANY nation will do for US aggression and foreign ventures. US could make a case that Israel is a rogue state that occupies West Bank, stole Golan Heights, kills Gazans, and spies on the US.
    Or US can cook up any excuse to go to war with Venezuela, Bolivia, black Africa, and etc. There are plenty of cruddy nations.
    But notice that the US military only barks and bites at nations hated by Jews.

    So, Jews have the power over the military because military is under civilian authority that has been bought up by or manned with Jewish power.

    There was some human rights fuss about something in Burma... Why isn't the US military moving over there?
    Mexico has tons of drug lords who commit murder and sell drugs to the US. Why isn't US waging on Mexico?

    All the US wars and aggressions are against nations hated by Jews.

    So, while the Military Industrial Complex may enjoy saber-rattling and wars, it has no agency and autonomy. Its enemies must be chosen by The Power. It's like dogs like to hunt, but the master gets to choose what animal shall be hunted: rabbits, foxes, pigs, deer, etc.

    Excellent points, Anon !

    To this one:

    Assad’s regime was the regulator that kept the balance of power and order in Syria. But US interferes and undermines the regulator and all hell breaks loose.

    I would add the following: this is true if you assume that the de-stabilization was inadvertent. It seems much more likely that we’re only at the beginning of the greater Israel project, which will be built on the mountain of corpses we’re right now engaged in creating for them.

    We will destroy all their neighbors, while the US and Europe are being flooded by waves of migrants to keep everyone’s attention close to home. We will keep provoking Russia and later China to keep the world attention focused on the risk of its own demise.

    And then, Israel will make its moves, massacring and ethnically cleansing the Palestinians, securing from its neighbors all the resources of oil, gas, and water in order to amass all the necessary accouterments of a major regional power.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Jonathan Revusky

    Now, Chinatown is about 5 miles from Washington High. And whether by car or bus it’s a ghastly trip. By car it takes a good hour during week day traffic.
     
    Well, I just checked Google Maps out of curiosity and I had it generate a route, using public transportation, from the Golden Gate Fortune Cookie Factory, just off Jackson Street, in the heart of Chinatown, to George Washington High School, which it estimates to take 46 minutes.

    In general, I find Google Maps to give a safe estimate so it probably takes a few minutes less than that in practice. For one thing, Google Maps typically assumes a pretty decrepit walking pace. I am sure the 9 minutes walking component of the route would be covered by healthy teenagers in a few minutes less than that. The 37 minute bus ride part, of course, probably is (and was) a 37 minute bus ride....

    It’s horrible, especially when it rains. Picture 50 people trying to crowd unto the Geary st bus. Then the horrible crowded awful bus that goes about 5 miles an hour till it gets west of Van Ness.
     
    Holy Cow! That reminds me of the trains that transported people to Auschwitz! Holy shit! Did they have gas chambers there too? Poor Betty!

    Well, if Betty had claustrophobia, I guess she could ride a bicycle. Google Maps gives that as a 43 minute bike ride. And again, it's probably a bit less than 43 minutes for a healthy teenager.

    But hold on a second, what is all this about anyway? The wager with Ron Unz that lies at the origin of this article was based on fact-checking a story that appeared in the media, and that story said Betty went to this high school. George Washington High. Are you saying she didn't go there because it is not feasible to commute for 40-odd minutes? WTF?

    Not only that, this Betty Ong, famous for the phone call on 9/11 (and absolutely nothing else) has now passed into the lore of George Washington High School as their most distinguished alumnus. For example, I noticed that they had a 75th anniversary celebration in 2011 and that had its own website. Here:

    http://www.gwhs75thanniversary.com/

    Look at the face at the very top of the page! And note that some other famous people went to this school apparently but they take second billing to Betty! The black poet Maya Angelou (who recited her work at at least one presidential inauguration) apparently was there in the 40's. Her picture is there but way below Betty Ong's. The singer Johnny Mathis went to George Washington High. (He's not black, like Maya Angelou, but is pretty seriously gay apparently....) These people come AFTER Betty!

    So the most distinguished alumnus of George Washington High according to the institution itself is deemed to be Betty Ong!

    Ain't that something?

    Someone found a Gloria Ong graduated 1972 from Galileo the Chinatown high school. That’s the right name and age of the sister.
     
    Someone found that, huh? Did that person provide a link?

    Anyway, if the Ong family all went to Galileo, why is that school not raising a stink about it? They're not claiming Betty Ong (famous for the phone call) or Gloria Ong (famous for being the sister of the Betty of the phone call) went there. Why don't the various students and teachers who presumably knew Betty and her siblings at Galileo High raise some stink about this mistake?

    Anyway, I am not the one who claims that Betty Ong went to this school. (I kinda doubt it frankly.) I'm just checking a fact that appeared in a lot of different places in the MSM. And Ron's wager, of course, was based on the idea that Ronnie can't conceive of such a widely reported "fact" not being so! So he never thought his $10,000 was at any real risk! (Think again, Ronnie...)

    Anyway, I am not the one who claims that Betty Ong went to this school. (I kinda doubt it frankly.) I’m just checking a fact that appeared in a lot of different places in the MSM. And Ron’s wager, of course, was based on the idea that Ronnie can’t conceive of such a widely reported “fact” not being so! So he never thought his $10,000 was at any real risk! (Think again, Ronnie…)

    But bizarrely George Washington High School, per your 75th Anniversary Link, contends she did attend their school even though she’s not listed in the Yearbook. Perhaps George Washington High School can provide copies of her Original Transcripts since she isn’t shown in the Yearbook.

    What is it with the Chinese and these Terrorist Spectacle Events? Dun Meng’s claim he was carjacked by the alleged Boston Bombers is also a bizarre story. And then we have the steel from the World Trade Center site being quickly disposed of to a Chinese Company, Baosteel. At least they were smart enough not to sell it to an Israeli Company. That would have been a bit too audacious, I suppose.

    Mangled WTC Steel Bought By China

    On a lighter note, nobody names their daughters Betty anymore. Or Barbara. Thank goodness.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    But bizarrely George Washington High School, per your 75th Anniversary Link, contends she did attend their school even though she’s not listed in the Yearbook.
     
    Well, actually, to be precise, the 75th anniversary event would be organized by the alumni association, I suppose, not the school administration specifically. That is why it's a separate website.

    But, look, the origin of the wager was that it was competely inconceivable to Ron Unz that the story would not check out. To the extent that he told me I was wasting my time to even bother.

    So, if Ron Unz reasons this way, it stands to reason that the people who set up that website likely reason the same way. It was so widely reported that Betty Ong graduated from George Washington High School in 1974 that they never checked!

    The fundamental problem here is that the Ronnie Unz reasoning in question is flawed. The repetition of a story does not make it true! That was what, in final analysis, the wager was about.

    So you can't just start going on saying that these people are repeating the story, therefore the story must be true, because that is precisely the proposition that is under dispute! Can't you see that?


    Perhaps George Washington High School can provide copies of her Original Transcripts since she isn’t shown in the Yearbook.
     
    Well, I didn't have a wager with Ron Unz about any transcripts, just about the yearbook.

    Maybe you can make a wager with him on this. (I'm personally tired of the whole thing so I leave it to you.)

    However, if Unz makes a separate wager with you on the transcripts, I would like him to pay me off on this wager on the yearbook first.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Washington Wobert
    Detailed contemporary accounts by mid-level military seem to have been scrubbed off the web. Here's a start:

    https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2011/04/09/baghdads-neutron-bomb-and-americas-nuclear-obama/

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/15/vt-nuclear-education-nukes-in-iraq-confirmation/

    Looking at it, Comment 52 is not clear about the sequence. The Battle of Baghdad was during the second US war of aggression against Iraq.

    Thank you, Wobert.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Spisarevski

    the EU it is the opposite – it is the new members which drain the money, and the old members who provide it.
     
    Actually it's the old members who drain the human and natural resources of the new members.
    The "money" the old members provide is not that much - in Bulgaria for example, when the membership fees are subtracted, the net funds received are about 500-600 million EUR per year, which is not a big deal, even for our small economy .
    Meanwhile, just the education of all the specialists who go to work in Western Europe costs billions of dollars more than the funds we received, and that education was paid with our taxes. There are all sorts of other hidden losses and lost profits as well - being forced to close perfectly safe nuclear reactors, to sell state monopolies and important industries to western entities under disadvantageous contracts that can't be broken because of "free trade" or something, and many others.
    Old member Germany is building a second Nord Stream while South Stream was denied to Bulgaria.

    Anyway I think Anatoly said somewhere recently that one of the main reasons the USSR fell apart is because it was uncool. While I agree, I can only hope that this will be true for the EU as well, I can't really imagine something more uncool than the EU.

    And this is why I can't understand for the life of me why are there sill sizeable factions in some countries that want to become part of the Western empire of niggerfaggotry, enormous and unaccountable bureaucracy (with commissars and everything) and hypocritical totalitarianism (the thought police varies from country to country but if this monstrosity doesn't fall apart, then we will all live in 1984 sooner or later).
    There is no freedom or prosperity waiting for you once you join these faggots - in fact, just the opposite.

    “the old members who drain the human and natural resources of the new members”

    Most British working people experience the drain on themselves, through lower wages, increased crime and worse public services. British employers, on the other hand, love the fact that they consider $10 an hour a great wage.

    The vast majority of the 3.5 million foreign workers in the UK are doing low-paid jobs, and paying little tax (for the others, see my next paragraph). One Polish child at a UK primary school costs about £6,000 a year, paid from taxes, while the tax paid by a minimum wage worker is about £880, so you need the tax from seven workers just for one child’s primary education.

    Male real median wages in the UK are lower now than in 1997.

    “the education of all the specialists who go to work in Western Europe costs billions of dollars more than the funds we received, and that education was paid with our taxes”

    You have a point there. My sister’s dentist surgery has dentists from Portugal, Bulgaria and Romania.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Anon
    It’s an arrogant comment. What the author wants is to reinstate the draft.

    Let those who want college tuition and free medical care enlist and get it. Let those who want to stay out of the military stays out.

    What the author wants I don’t know, but a great part of what he wrote is Empire’s propaganda or outright nonsense, as other commentators also pointed out. The rest is more or less OK. For example, all the part about the “petulant, overarmed, misbehaved Russia” and Murica’s best-in-world-history military are BS propaganda.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @reiner Tor
    This is exactly my thinking. I’ve always thought it made exactly zero sense to export raw materials or fossil fuels in the long run. There might be short term reasons for that, but exporters should aim to move away from that and instead add value.

    An example could be Emirates or Qatar Airways. By taking advantage of their fortunate geographic location and the low fuel prices resulting from their hydrocarbon reserves they are selling a service with much higher added value than just exporting oil.

    It rather depends on the quantity of raw materials available vs. the real and potential domestic demand.

    Dubai for instance has far fewer reserves than Abu Dhabi, which is why they went for major diversification.

    Admittedly Emirates (as well as Etihad and Qatar Airways) could get into trouble in the future as a result of the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350. But if they do they had a good run, and Dubai’s value as an entrepot remains.

    But yes, the classical mercantilist formula is to reduce the cost of raw materials and increase the amount of value added by your own industry. There were some flaws in the formula of course such as the obsessive focus on the accumulation of bullion, and while “comparative advantage” is complete nonsense there are still advantages in less managed trade.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The April 14 missile attacks on Syria were a politically-motivated fireworks display that were largely designed to silence Trump's critics. The attacks-- which were coordinated with Moscow-- did not kill any Russian, Syrian, Iranian or Hezbollah combat troops. They did not kill any Syrian civilians. They did not impede the Syrian Army's ongoing military offensive...
  • @DC
    It may be that Trump knows exactly what he is doing and has tricked the neo-cons/noe-liberals in to thinking he’s tough on Syria and Russia while behind their backs colluding with Putin to avoid ww3 and working to pull out of Syria regardless.

    The strike was really just a $150million advertising opportunity for Russian missil defense systems. The idiot general that announced 100% success should be fired as spokesperson for the pentagon-deep state. His ploy might have had a chance at being credible with a 93% success rate but 100% was never going to be credible!

    As for Bolton and Pompeo, keep your enemies close so you know what they are doing, tell them what they want to hear, let them imagine they are powerful and then take them down when they least expect it.

    Anything is possible here. Ya can’t just mate the king in a castled position. Ya have to pin, skewer, fork and threat to win. Bolton could be neocon prophylactic . He could be Sheldon brand ,TM oven mitts for red hot neocon buttons. Maybe he will toss Bolton after this at some point. I mean to do neocon stuff without a Bolton would tend to stick more to Trump. That would be really Machiavellian stuff….

    It would also be really kind of funny if Russia baited this for their arms industry. What will really be telling is their sales of these systems in the next few years. It was a weapons demo.

    As for domestically?

    scenario #1
    Our missiles are crap and need to be updated?
    They are? Prove it.
    Fire some missile at Syria and see what happens.

    scenario #2
    Sheldon has some cash.
    for what?
    You have to take in Bolton and take his advice.
    Trump does so with disinterest , an lobs a few..

    scenario #3

    Trump had a spicy meal last night….

    scenario #4
    He has eyes for Bibi and his playboy life style is just a front….or he is a regular old crypto-zionist.

    I mean what is to make of lobbing a few in half hearted , neocon fashion?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • Mr. Bacevich, thank you for a great article that has given me much food for thought. One quibble: We should’ve used the atom bomb in Korea. Eastern cultures perceive restraint as weakness. We set a very bad precedent by not using the bomb, one which contributed to our losing Vietnam (where we shouldn’t have been).

    We failed, to varying degrees, to achieve our objectives in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan because the enemy engaged in fourth-generation warfare. In all three cases they knew that we’d leave eventually and that they emphatically weren’t leaving. They just had to wait us out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • Eurostat is out with numbers on book reading. Curious trivia.

    France looks curiously low. And share is not the same as time spent. Here’s that:

    So France continues to underperform. Very strange. Finally a map:

    Unfortunately the mapmaker is retarded. It isn’t the “share of people” but “time spent” that is being highlighted. I was positively surprised by Greece and to some extent even Turkey. Outside of France I’d say the biggest negative outlier is Austria.

    Though if you look at expenditure on newspapers, books etc, both the French and the Austrians do decently well. Maybe they just buy more expensive books which are more intellectual but read less? Or maybe their newspapers are high-brow enough that less of book-reading is needed.

    I’d be interested in the quality of books rather than just time spent on books. Someone reading Harry Potter, 50 shades of grey and a ton of chick-lit isn’t on the same level as someone reading a few major intellectual tomes per year. But I guess that would be too “elitist”, or maybe hard to measure.

    Read More
    • Replies: @LondonBob
    France is no longer a European country.
    , @Anatoly Karlin

    I’d be interested in the quality of books rather than just time spent on books. Someone reading Harry Potter, 50 shades of grey and a ton of chick-lit isn’t on the same level as someone reading a few major intellectual tomes per year.
     
    Might be able to compile this from an index of sales stats based on popular, widely-translated science, history, etc. books (though I imagine Eastern Europe will be a bit underweighed due to widespread piracy).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • Rumors about the intelligence and impeccable honesty of the Brits are highly exaggerated: “The Skripal Affair: A Lie Too Far? by Michael Jabara Carley” http://www.voltairenet.org/article200813.html
    “The Russian government, in fact, proposed that the alleged poisoning of the Skripals should be examined by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in The Hague, according to procedures to which Britain itself had agreed when the OPCW was established in 1997. …

    The British attempted hijacking of the OPCW has compromised its independence… Moreover, since the BZ toxin is made by the US, Britain and other NATO countries, it begs the same questions, which the Tories put to Moscow: How did the perpetrators obtain the BZ toxin and bring it to Salisbury? Did MI5 or MI6 authorise a false flag attack against the Skripals, or was it authorised by the British cabinet or by the prime minister alone? Or did British authorities lose control of their stockpiles? The trail of evidence does not lead to Moscow; it leads to London.

    A prima facie case can be made that the British government is lying about the Skripal affaire. … British authorities are now saying that they have other top-secret evidence, which explains everything, but unfortunately, it can’t be publicised. …

    Given all the evidence, can any person with reasonable abilities to think critically believe anything the Tories are saying about the Salisbury affair?
    “They are liars. And they know that they are liars,” the late Egyptian writer and Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz once wrote: “And we know that they are liars. Even so, they keep lying….” Mahfouz was not writing about the British, but all the same, he could have been. Are not his well-known lines apposite to the present government in London?”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Mike P

    The problem is not with the US military. It is with the post-military strategy, for which the military is ill-equipped to handle. It’s not the military that is deciding to stay forever.
     
    The failure to rebuild functioning nation states and the "need" for continuous occupation are not bugs but features. The ongoing occupation of Afghanistan has nothing to do with "fighting terror" or "spreading democracy and freedom" - it is to encircle Iran and preventing it from linking up with China. Afghanistan cannot be allowed to make its own decisions in this matter, so it must endure the occupation.

    Excellent point, Mike!

    It’s all about keeping every country in check and scared so no one here or there ever starts to ask: ‘what the hell are we doing ?’ and ‘what have we done ?’

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Well-written article, but Andrew Bacevich avoids (as usual) examining–or even mentioning–(1) the massive money, (2) entrenched political machinery, and (3) intellectual sleight-of-hand which funds, formulates, and justifies Washington’s lopsided and murderous Mideast ‘foreign policies’.

    Shall we count the bodies together, Andrew?

    Iraq, for instance, was a functioning and rising society before Zio-American forces went in there and annihilated it. Millions died or were wounded. Millions more have been displaced. Chaos came next.

    Shouldn’t the perpetrators be identified and punished, Mr. Bacevich?

    Any thoughts on crime and punishment?

    In the meantime, let’s see if we can detect a pattern in all this.

    Here’s the hit list:

    Anti-Zionist Iraq: Crushed and neutralized. Anti-Zionist Syria: In ruins. Anti-Zionist Palestine: Under siege and in permanent lockdown. Anti-Zionist Libya: Dismembered and neutralized. And (coming soon): Death, misery and mayhem delivered to pro-Palestinian (and anti-Zionist) Lebanon and pro-Palestinian (anti-Zionist) Iran.

    Is there a pattern here?–(one that Mr. Bacevich failed to notice)

    Perhaps.

    Are there pro-Zionist fingerprints in this crime scene?

    Oh, maybe.

    With entire nations destroyed, does this massive destruction not have the appearance of a criminal enterprise?

    Possibly.

    But support our troops!

    Bibi was right when he (privately) whispered to a concerned Israeli: “Don’t worry about America. America can be moved.”

    So true.

    America has certainly been ‘moved’.

    We are headed over a cliff!

    But Bacevich barely notices. His ‘scholarship’ is typical of the Zionist-friendly, PC drivel that emanates from ‘TomDispatch’.

    Fact: Zio-Washington is on a prolonged, blood-soaked, trillion-dollar killing spree.

    Can we talk about it?

    Death, discord and destruction (of Israel’s foes) is the objective.

    So from an Israeli perspective, things are going very well in Libya, Iraq, Syria and Palestine.

    Israel is rising. Her foes are sinking.

    America’s ‘military disasters’ are just what the Jewish doctor ordered. Mission accomplished!

    Yet all Bacevich can finally say is that America’s all-volunteer army is “the root cause of our predicament”.

    Are we to take this man seriously?

    What about Israel’s de facto ownership of the US Congress, Andrew?

    Any thoughts about ‘patterns’ of ownership of American mass media, Mr. Bacevich?

    Maybe next article, eh?

    Bacevich as presented his readers a huge puzzle which he is determined not to solve. Perhaps that’s his objective.

    Read More
    • Agree: Mike P, renfro
    • Replies: @Anon
    Great post, just what I think.
    , @Rurik

    Fact: Zio-Washington is on a prolonged, blood-soaked, trillion-dollar killing spree.
     
    multi-trillion dollar killing spree

    What about Israel’s de facto ownership of the US Congress, Andrew?

    Any thoughts about ‘patterns’ of ownership of American mass media, Mr. Bacevich?
     
    Bacevich is a rank whore

    an unctuous, gaping gash, undulating in yawning anticipation for copious and well-earned wampum.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHn6tDG1Vfc
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Jonathan Revusky

    Now, Chinatown is about 5 miles from Washington High. And whether by car or bus it’s a ghastly trip. By car it takes a good hour during week day traffic.
     
    Well, I just checked Google Maps out of curiosity and I had it generate a route, using public transportation, from the Golden Gate Fortune Cookie Factory, just off Jackson Street, in the heart of Chinatown, to George Washington High School, which it estimates to take 46 minutes.

    In general, I find Google Maps to give a safe estimate so it probably takes a few minutes less than that in practice. For one thing, Google Maps typically assumes a pretty decrepit walking pace. I am sure the 9 minutes walking component of the route would be covered by healthy teenagers in a few minutes less than that. The 37 minute bus ride part, of course, probably is (and was) a 37 minute bus ride....

    It’s horrible, especially when it rains. Picture 50 people trying to crowd unto the Geary st bus. Then the horrible crowded awful bus that goes about 5 miles an hour till it gets west of Van Ness.
     
    Holy Cow! That reminds me of the trains that transported people to Auschwitz! Holy shit! Did they have gas chambers there too? Poor Betty!

    Well, if Betty had claustrophobia, I guess she could ride a bicycle. Google Maps gives that as a 43 minute bike ride. And again, it's probably a bit less than 43 minutes for a healthy teenager.

    But hold on a second, what is all this about anyway? The wager with Ron Unz that lies at the origin of this article was based on fact-checking a story that appeared in the media, and that story said Betty went to this high school. George Washington High. Are you saying she didn't go there because it is not feasible to commute for 40-odd minutes? WTF?

    Not only that, this Betty Ong, famous for the phone call on 9/11 (and absolutely nothing else) has now passed into the lore of George Washington High School as their most distinguished alumnus. For example, I noticed that they had a 75th anniversary celebration in 2011 and that had its own website. Here:

    http://www.gwhs75thanniversary.com/

    Look at the face at the very top of the page! And note that some other famous people went to this school apparently but they take second billing to Betty! The black poet Maya Angelou (who recited her work at at least one presidential inauguration) apparently was there in the 40's. Her picture is there but way below Betty Ong's. The singer Johnny Mathis went to George Washington High. (He's not black, like Maya Angelou, but is pretty seriously gay apparently....) These people come AFTER Betty!

    So the most distinguished alumnus of George Washington High according to the institution itself is deemed to be Betty Ong!

    Ain't that something?

    Someone found a Gloria Ong graduated 1972 from Galileo the Chinatown high school. That’s the right name and age of the sister.
     
    Someone found that, huh? Did that person provide a link?

    Anyway, if the Ong family all went to Galileo, why is that school not raising a stink about it? They're not claiming Betty Ong (famous for the phone call) or Gloria Ong (famous for being the sister of the Betty of the phone call) went there. Why don't the various students and teachers who presumably knew Betty and her siblings at Galileo High raise some stink about this mistake?

    Anyway, I am not the one who claims that Betty Ong went to this school. (I kinda doubt it frankly.) I'm just checking a fact that appeared in a lot of different places in the MSM. And Ron's wager, of course, was based on the idea that Ronnie can't conceive of such a widely reported "fact" not being so! So he never thought his $10,000 was at any real risk! (Think again, Ronnie...)

    That 37 minutes estimate is only valid from 1 to 5 am.

    And you don’t know her address in Chinatown. It involves a lot more than just the Geary bus

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    That 37 minutes estimate is only valid from 1 to 5 am.
     
    Wow, you just lie pretty smoothly and automatically, eh? Well, you're not a very good liar though. Maybe you should take some time to think about your lies first. I said specifically that the route was using public transportation. The last #1 bus runs at 1:15 a.m. and resumes at 4:40 a.m. So your 1 to 5 a.m. window is almost exactly when that route does NOT work, because the buses aren't running then. See:

    https://www.sfmta.com/routes/1-california

    In fact, the the 37 minute estimate from Google Maps on the bus ride was for about 8 a.m. I also note from this page I link above that the frequency of the buses at that time is every 6 minutes. So the commute looks quite feasible. Granted, I don't know whether the bus schedule was the same back in Betty's day, but I don't see much reason to think it was very different.

    But you see, again, you guys just assume that I'm a bullshitter like you. But I'm not. If I check something like this, I check it.


    And you don’t know her address in Chinatown.
     
    Well, no, I don't know her exact address in Chinatown. I don't think you do either. Well, frankly, I have serious doubts whether there is an exact address, since I have great doubts about the whole story of these people!

    I doubt the exact starting address makes that much difference because the Chinatown area is pretty compact really. I took the Golden Gate Fortune Cookie Factory as a starting point because it's a major tourist landmark in that area. If the bus ride is 37 minutes, the commute is completely feasible. That it takes a few minutes more or less to walk to the bus stop and back would not matter very much.

    But none of this matters anyway. I am saying the above as somebody who doesn't even believe that any of these people really attended that school. But that would not be because it is infeasible to commute from the Chinatown area to that school! It obviously is feasible.

    Well, assuming one exists, it's feasible. If you don't exist, then that is kind of a first order problem...

    Well, on third thought, if Betty didn't exist, then the commute is probably even more feasible because then she could probably get away with not paying the bus fare!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Jake
    The reason that US militarism is so frightening is that like its parent English imperialism it is insatiable and the very definition of self-righteous and features a world class ability to lie and deceive.

    British imperialism was not so frightening.
    Britain was and is a small country, that never had the resources the USA has.
    British colonial wars were small, and not costly in money, except before WWI the Boer War.
    Ian Hernon, ‘Britain’s Forgotten Wars, Colonial Campaigns of the 19th Century’, 2003, 2007, Chalford – Stroud
    Even the Boers, with a few cannon, and just rifles, were a formidable opponent.
    The natives were no match at all for repeater rifles, shrapnel cannon, or battleships.
    The British empire could exist through bluff, manipulation, bribes, diplomacy.
    WWI changed all that.
    Germany was not a bunch of natives with spears and muskets.
    WWII was the end of the British empire, thanks to Churchill:
    John Charmley, ‘Der Untergang des Britischen Empires, Roosevelt – Churchill und Amerikas Weg zur Weltmacht’, Graz 2005
    As far as I know the book just was published as german translation, I suppose no British publisher dared to publish the original by British historian Charmley.
    That Churchill was not a hero, but an undertaker, it cannot be true.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Thorfinnsson
    Low domestic gas prices are only a problem if it results in production dropping below domestic demand, with demand substituted by imports.

    Obviously this will not happen since the imports themselves would be LNG, excluding Canadian imports which are benign (and Canada doesn't have enough reserves to replace American producers in bulk).

    Increased gas production to satisfy export demand will simply result in us running out of gas reserves sooner at the expensive of a smaller heavy industrial production base.

    In the long-term I'm also skeptical of the viability of LNG in any case. With the development of OBOR and Russia's own efforts it's inevitable that FSU and Persian Gulf gas will be delivered to East Asia by pipeline.

    It's also worth pointing out that according to the US Energy Information Agency that China presently has the world's largest reserves of technically recoverable shale gas. Exploitation is a problem owing to distance from water resources and a lack of technological expertise.

    These are surmountable problems as proven by America's fracking industry. Both the Eagle Ford and Bakken formations are in dry areas not very close to fresh water, and the fracking industry didn't even exist at the turn of the century. Dick Cheney promoted invading Iraq because his energy working group predicted that by this time America would be importing 90% of its oil consumption.

    Meanwhile larger and more competitive industries in chemicals, steel, fertilizer, plastics, cement, etc. add more final value and represent a greater overall level of product complexity and technical efficiency. As most of these products are themselves intermediate input goods they'll increase the competitiveness of our final goods industries as well.

    Another possible use of our gas supremacy is in our world class freight railroad system. Currently this system is diesel-based. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad (a Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary) is currently experimenting with gas-powered locomotives.

    This is exactly my thinking. I’ve always thought it made exactly zero sense to export raw materials or fossil fuels in the long run. There might be short term reasons for that, but exporters should aim to move away from that and instead add value.

    An example could be Emirates or Qatar Airways. By taking advantage of their fortunate geographic location and the low fuel prices resulting from their hydrocarbon reserves they are selling a service with much higher added value than just exporting oil.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thorfinnsson
    It rather depends on the quantity of raw materials available vs. the real and potential domestic demand.

    Dubai for instance has far fewer reserves than Abu Dhabi, which is why they went for major diversification.

    Admittedly Emirates (as well as Etihad and Qatar Airways) could get into trouble in the future as a result of the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350. But if they do they had a good run, and Dubai's value as an entrepot remains.

    But yes, the classical mercantilist formula is to reduce the cost of raw materials and increase the amount of value added by your own industry. There were some flaws in the formula of course such as the obsessive focus on the accumulation of bullion, and while "comparative advantage" is complete nonsense there are still advantages in less managed trade.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thorfinnsson
    The guy named himself after Frederic Bastiat, what do you expect?

    Bastiat is the same genius who proposed that France should unilaterally disarm, and that this good example would inspire Prussia to disarm.

    Louis Napoleon thought otherwise and wished to expand the French Army to a million men, but his liberal ministers were more inclined to agree with Bastiat's thinking though they didn't go as far as unilateral disarmament.


    Despite his failing health, Napoleon III could see that the Prussian Army, combined with the armies of Bavaria and the other German states, would be a formidable enemy. In 1866, Prussia, with a population of 22 million, had been able to mobilize an army of 700,000 men, while France, with population of 26 million, had an army of only 385,000 men, of whom 100,000 were in Algeria, Mexico, and Rome.[131] In the autumn of 1867, Napoleon III proposed a form of universal military service, similar to the Prussian system, to increase the size of the French Army, if needed, to 1 million. His proposal was opposed by many French officers, such as Marechal Randon, who preferred a smaller, more professional army; he said: "This proposal will only give us recruits; it's soldiers we need."[132] It was also strongly opposed by the republican opposition in the French parliament, who denounced the proposal as a militarization of French society. The republican deputy, Émile Ollivier, who later became Napoleon's prime minister, declared: "The armies of France, which I always considered too large, are now going to be increased to an exorbitant size. Why? What is the necessity? Where is the danger? Who is threatening us? ...If France were to disarm, the Germans would know how to convince their governments to do the same. "[133] Facing almost certain defeat in the parliament, Napoleon III withdrew the proposal. It was replaced in January 1868 by a much more modest project to create a garde mobile, or reserve force, to support the army. [134]
     
    Woops...

    Bastiat is the same genius who proposed that France should unilaterally disarm, and that this good example would inspire Prussia to disarm.

    I wish more Frenchmen were like him…
    Europe would be a better place.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Anon[648] • Disclaimer says:
    @daniel le mouche
    So why don't you be the one to go to the school, get the yearbook, contact classmates, interview them on any recollections or lack of them? Clear things up! Concrete evidence is needed, no more off the internet.

    Couple days ago I posted that I’m going to San Francisco for the summer and I might go to Washington and try to get the yearbook.

    But now I doubt she went to Washington. 76 high schools in San Francisco Maybe Sparkon can use google maps to find the yearbook.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cold N. Holefield
    You doubt JR AND you doubt George Washington High School? I don't understand your stance or argument if you have one.

    JR has provided a link where George Washington High School heralds Betty Ong as their most Distinguished Alumnus. Are they lying? If they are, why would they lie about something like this? Are they mistaken? If they're mistaken, how the hell could they be about something like this? I would think they'd verify it before heralding it, don't you?

    Unless that link JR provided is bogus. I don't know how to verify its authenticity though. Does anyone?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Polish Perspective

    FDI was 176 Billion in 2016. Polish GDP was 469 Billion.
     
    China gets around 100-120 billion USD per year in FDI. Who knew that Poland gets 50% more than China with less than 1/20th the population?

    Please, learn basic math first before opining. Your basic common sense should have kicked in long ago when you even typed that comment.

    The guy named himself after Frederic Bastiat, what do you expect?

    Bastiat is the same genius who proposed that France should unilaterally disarm, and that this good example would inspire Prussia to disarm.

    Louis Napoleon thought otherwise and wished to expand the French Army to a million men, but his liberal ministers were more inclined to agree with Bastiat’s thinking though they didn’t go as far as unilateral disarmament.

    Despite his failing health, Napoleon III could see that the Prussian Army, combined with the armies of Bavaria and the other German states, would be a formidable enemy. In 1866, Prussia, with a population of 22 million, had been able to mobilize an army of 700,000 men, while France, with population of 26 million, had an army of only 385,000 men, of whom 100,000 were in Algeria, Mexico, and Rome.[131] In the autumn of 1867, Napoleon III proposed a form of universal military service, similar to the Prussian system, to increase the size of the French Army, if needed, to 1 million. His proposal was opposed by many French officers, such as Marechal Randon, who preferred a smaller, more professional army; he said: “This proposal will only give us recruits; it’s soldiers we need.”[132] It was also strongly opposed by the republican opposition in the French parliament, who denounced the proposal as a militarization of French society. The republican deputy, Émile Ollivier, who later became Napoleon’s prime minister, declared: “The armies of France, which I always considered too large, are now going to be increased to an exorbitant size. Why? What is the necessity? Where is the danger? Who is threatening us? …If France were to disarm, the Germans would know how to convince their governments to do the same. “[133] Facing almost certain defeat in the parliament, Napoleon III withdrew the proposal. It was replaced in January 1868 by a much more modest project to create a garde mobile, or reserve force, to support the army. [134]

    Woops…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mitleser

    Bastiat is the same genius who proposed that France should unilaterally disarm, and that this good example would inspire Prussia to disarm.
     
    I wish more Frenchmen were like him...
    Europe would be a better place.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @utu

    Does this mean Kennedy didn’t die?
     
    That what Revusky and the Youtube Yahoos would conclude if there was Youtube in 1963: Jackie Kennedy is a crisis actor and not that good one. She should have shown more grief.

    Well, Sparkon claims 9/11 didn’t happen and the WTC is still there because he couldn’t see it on google maps.

    Read More
    • Troll: Jonathan Revusky
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @reiner Tor
    In Hungary the genius leftist-liberal government in the 1990s privatized most public utilities. So you get your electricity from E.ON, your water supply from Veolia Environnement, etc. Our first conservative government (not yet Fidesz) In 1993 sold our telephone monopoly to Deutsche Telekom. They immediately raised prices and “sold” the Hungarian subsidiary their own obsolete equipment which was due to be replaced in Germany anyway. Now the Hungarian customers paid for it anyway within a couple of years through higher prices, but now we’re paying them permanent dividends. They are now in the broadband internet provider monopoly business (in most areas there’s still very little competition, with either them or UPC, or sometimes some other firm), which could easily be done by a Hungarian owned company. Though at least cell phone service (where DT became also dominant due to its earlier presence in the telephone monopoly, when the mobile business was still insignificant) is the more important part (probably it needs a bigger company as owner due to economies of scale), but even here: I understand we needed foreigners to run the show, and I understand that the Germans are not worse than others, but please don’t turn this into a morality play of how they are supposed to “subsidize” us.

    I understand we needed foreigners to run the show

    There’s a significant difference between taking in selective FDI in key industries and outright letting “foreigners run the show”. East Asia and especially China did the former. Are you sure you are a nationalist?

    but please don’t turn this into a morality play of how they are supposed to “subsidize” us.

    My argument is much simpler. The West gains more from the East once you consider all three factors: public funds, private funds and labour movement. In the debate, we only hear about the first. We never hear about the last two.

    Therefore, the solution I prefer is clean and simple: we stop receiving public funds(literal pay-off money) and they stop getting free labour+monopolistic access to our domestic market. Don’t forget that 75% of our EU funds are re-invested in Western European companies.

    The thing is, the West knows this. Günther Öttinger, who is in charge of cohesion funds has all but admitted this. There’s a quote I’m too lazy to google where he says in half-jest that if anything the EU should pay EE countries more. But instead of that, my preferred option would achieve a far cleaner break. However, the West would also never agree to it, precisely because they know the real scorecard, which is why their threats of cutting EU funds during the asylum crisis was always a hoax.

    It’s interesting, but perhaps not surprising, that Eastern Europeans like yourself have completely and whoolly swallowed the “you should be grateful” meme, while warning about “morality tales” when you aren’t advocating for your own colonisation of “letting foreigners running the show”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor

    foreigners run the show
     
    I used it in the context of cell phone providers, where at least two decades ago there could have been some need for economies of scale. I’m not wholly sure.

    In general I think my comment wasn’t clear enough, I mostly agreed with you. E.g. the “morality tale” referred to the supposed western “subsidies” which we lazy Easterners supposedly receive.

    Anyway, now there are some points you made which I actually disagree with.

    we stop receiving public funds(literal pay-off money) and they stop getting free labour+monopolistic access to our domestic market.
     
    It’s impossible. Our educated elites (and even the not so educated unwashed masses) actively want the ability to choose to go to work in Western Europe. Short of Eastern Bloc style border fences and criminalization of emigration, how can you prevent the West (actually, the western elites) from taking advantage of your labor force?

    And short of capital controls and full scale nationalization, how can you prevent the profit repatriations?

    So the EU funds will be cut, unless the V4 can somehow show some force, but it’s unclear how. Cutting those funds is actually popular in Germany, I’m sure.
    , @Ali Choudhury
    I doubt most Poles would be keen to ditch the opportunity of making German wages out of some sort of nationalistic amour propre.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • “I honestly don’t know who in the US should get the credit for doing the right thing, but that person(s) deserves our collective gratitude. Rumors say that Mattis was the man, others point to Dunford and some even to Trump himself (I doubt that). Again, I don’t know who did it, but this action deserves a standing ovation.”

    I believe the decision to scale back the missile attack on Syria was made by Orange Clown’s jewish-supremacist handlers themselves. As I see it, Orange Clown and the “people” around him are nothing but props. The whole Orange Clown administration is pure political theater, IMO.

    I think the reason Bolton was appointed (and the reason Mattis has not been fired), is because the juxtaposition of the two – on either side of the arbitrary and capricious Orange Clown – gives our gamesmen maximum propagandistic flexibility in their psyop against humanity.

    When a bellicose Trump makes threats, we’re to take it that he’s merely channeling Bolton. Then the gamesmen observe the response of the “system”, and they’re free to appropriately follow up with anything on the spectrum from bloodthirsty psychopath (Bolton) to that of a somewhat more reasonable bastard (Mattis).

    I think this Bolton/Mattis dialectic is exemplified with the strike against Syria. Orange Clown was ordered by his handlers to marshal the naval strike group and make the necessary threats, i.e., to provide the stimulus, then the gamesmen studied the Russian response. And when the Russians put their ships to sea and the Russian Airborne Command Center took to flight or whatever, they assessed that Russia would respond militarily. Apparently not yet willing to start WW3, they had the flexibility to take a step back and attribute it to the influence of Mattis, thus limiting the loss of face.

    Anyway, the big picture here, as I see it, is that Orange Clown and his handlers are faced with the same problem that Obama and his handlers had: All the low-hanging fruit has already been picked. And any attempt to pick the fruit hanging at a higher level, e.g. Syria, is associated with some very serious risks.

    In the confusion that reigned immediately after Orange Clown’s inauguration, the opportunistic Orange Clown was able to quickly prop a ladder up against the tree, and start climbing (something that Hillary Clinton wouldn’t have been able to do). Despite Orange Clown’s affectatious posturing, it has now become clear that Orange Clown intended to pick the fruit himself (of course for his handlers), rather than spray the insects threatening the fruit, as he had disingenuously intimated.

    So here we are now at a stalemate, albeit a very dangerous one, with Vladimir Putin trying to avoid a nuclear war (but already backed into a corner and ready to fight if forced), and Orange Clown’s handlers working day and night, interminably probing and pushing the limits, trying to come up with their next move.

    Perhaps the next “click” will be some kind of catastrophic false-flag attack?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Perhaps the next “click” will be some kind of catastrophic false-flag attack?
     
    To be "catastrophic" means that Russia gets false-flagged, not Syria or Iran. It could happen. The Zionists want "regime change" with the destruction of Syria and Iran, and they're not going to get it while the Russians remain in the area .

    False-flags need time, preparation and co-ordination, and a clue might be the current intense anti-Russian propaganda. Modern day Zionist false-flags always seem to start with a preparatory media barrage against the target, and there's no doubt that Russia is getting the treatment.

    They could sink a US Navy ship to get their war, but what would the subsequent US assault look like? and with what kind of Russian response? It's given that the US can't fight a ground war in Syria and Iran, and it's navy and air force are too exposed to modern weapons, so as Saker suggests it could quickly develop into a Middle East nuclear war.

    This would give Israel/US/Saudi Arabia their victory, with the bet that Russia would pull back from a full inter-continental nuclear engagement given that only Syrian and Iranian targets are hit with nuclear weapons.

    However, if the fated bullet happened to be in that fated chamber, the Russians would decide to get it over with, and flatten Israel, New York, Washington, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, the Pentagon, Langley etc. with a few thousand warheads to spare.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Anon[648] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sparkon

    Go ahead Sparkon, use your wonderful google skills and tell me how I am wrong about how to to get from Chinatown to the outer Richmond.

    Your pontificating about cities you’ve never been to is ridiculous. You should be embarrassed
     

    But anon[257] wasn't done yet with his BS, although no new gold frame so far, and nobody knows what Chinatown has to do with 9/11.

    Now he lies again that I deny the towers fell. What a lying sack of you-know-what!

    Anon[257] • says
    April 23, 2018 at 4:44 am GMT • 100 Words


    Because Sparkon denies the towers fell despite various people present in Manhattan or across the river in Brooklyn seeing the planes crash into the buildings.
     

    That's rather devious and small of you anon[257], taunting me from within a comment addressed to Jonathan Revusky, and then following up with a bald face lie. You're supposed to be the guy with the gold border around his BS, not the mouse who squeaked, or a craven lying cur.

    You disparage the Internet, yet here you are, running your mouth, and spreading hearsay, gossip, and big fat lies, trying to forge new internet myths and urban legends for morons, I suppose, and I must say, you're just the jackass for the job.

    I'm so sorry that you are perplexed by maps. Many people use them -- except women -- but you seem to be suffering from the girlie delusion that I should be ashamed because I know how to read and use maps. Map envy yet. Who knew?

    But wait, there's more. Incredibly enough, I have GPS for my car that allows me to enter any two addresses, and the doggone thing draws the route on a little map, and a slightly robotic female voice gives me driving directions. If this is the future, I think we're almost there, but I am happy to learn that you can find your way across town without help, like a big boy. You don't need no stinking maps.

    Now this next part may cause you to chew on your foot, even swallow it whole so you can blow it out your ass later, but during my time in the Air Force, it was my wont -- actually my duty -- to pontificate quite a bit, in writing no less, about places I'd never been and things I'd never seen, except as photographs, drawings, models, and maps.

    'Nice work, as they say, if you can get it.

    In fact, during my service, I had an assignment where I worked in a large room with dozens of airmen, and all of us churning out reports about places we'd never been.

    Did you know that there are entire towns and HOAs that aren’t even on google maps? They are mostly very wealthy neighborhoods that don’t want burglars and kidnappers using google maps to target the residents for burglary and kidnapping.

    Over the years I have noticed that every time someone posts that he or she was there that day and saw the crash and the towers come down you claim the event never happened and that you have figured out it was all a gigantic fraud using the internet and google maps.

    Use google maps to check out lower manhattan the east river and Brooklyn. Manhattan and the WTC can easily be seen from much of Brooklyn.

    Thousands of people in New Jersey looked across the Hudson and saw the whole thing that day.

    If you check google maps you will see that thousands could see the whole thing

    You don’t seem to realize that maps and google maps are horizontal and flat.

    But in reality buildings are vertical. The WTC was the tallest building in New York.

    All people had to do was just look up instead of straight ahead and they could see the WTC. Didn’t they teach you that in the Air Force? I believe it’s called elevation

    Ever been to Chicago? The Sears Tower was once the tallest building in the world. It can be seen from all over downtown just by looking up at the sky and there it is.

    If I look straight ahead or down I can’t see the high rises in the Century City business district a few miles away.

    But all I have to do is look up to the sky and there they are.

    I can’t see the mountains about 15 miles to the north when I am looking straight ahead or down.

    But all I have to do is lift my head and look up and there they are.

    You were in the Air Force? Jeez how low can the standards go.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sparkon

    You don’t seem to realize that maps and google maps are horizontal [sic] and flat.
     
    It's amazing the BS you can read on the Internet peddled by morons posing as experts.

    Doofus anon[257] doesn't know diddley about maps or Google either one, including the fact that there is a 3D layer in Google Earth, and also street view in Google Maps.

    Google Earth now uses an auto 3D scanning technology to produce 3D representations of buildings and other large features, trying even for trees with raggy results, but when the 3D layer was first introduced in 2009, all the buildings were modeled by hand primarily using the SketchUp 3D modeling application. I know because I did this kid of work at the time, and several of my building models were on Google Earth until the auto-scanning technology was introduced in 2012, and all the hand-built models were retired to the 3D warehouse.

    The new 3D technology has the advantage that everything is modeled, where with the old system, if an artist didn't model the building and upload it to the 3D warehouse, and get it approved by Google Earth, it didn't appear on the 3D layer. All the 3D stuff had to be done by hand, where now it can be done automatically with 3D scanning, although not every area has it yet.

    In short, you're completely wrong. Again.

    You were in the Air Force? Jeez how low can the standards go.
     
    You just talk trash, and shoot yourself in the foot when you try to denigrate my service. In fact, the USAF has high enlistment requirements, and I was in an elite Air Force command. Crème de la crème was the way they put it, and we had nothing but top-notch people of the highest caliber, which is why it gets so dreary talking with a ignoramus like you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @gwynedd1
    I recall another crisply formulated aphorism that came from a German I had briefly come to know when I was rather young. I remember a few things like his preference Silvaner over Riesling. The most memorable thing was a German explaining to me a method that prevents tyranny which is drafted armies.

    The Vietnam war can be know for three things at least. One is it was the last draft we had during war; it was remarkable in the freedom of the press; and it was hence a very unpopular war that was actually being won on the battle field. Well, they were not going to make those mistakes again.

    Laugh —- and

    laughing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @EugeneGur

    Putin/Russia are fighting the “Anglo Zionist” empire because the same empire simply wishes to dispose of the regime in Kremlin and take over the country
     
    This means that Russia is fighting a defensive war and the West the war of aggression, which by definition makes Russia right and the West wrong.

    Two mobsters in a turf war.
     
    For the Russians "the turf", as you put it, is our own country and we do defend it. It's the oldest trick in the book - to equate the aggressor and the defender because they both use military means. In reality, there is only one mafia here, and it isn't Russia.

    should the empire goes down tomorrow, “Team Putin” will want to replace U.S. deep state in a second.
     
    That we do not know. The only thing we do know is what is going on right before our eyes: the US and the entire West behaving like a gangster disregarding any and every rule of civilized behavior and endangering everyone, and Russia acting as the only adult in the room. The rest is a transparent attempt to justify the West's behavior: the West isn't to blame, for"both sides are equally bad".

    The US-style “democracy on the march” in Poland, the obedient vassal of the ZUSA: https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/04/breaking-polish-political-prisoner-mateusz-piskorski-to-be-charged-with-espionage-for-russia/
    “The Polish National Prosecutor’s Office has issued an indictment against the famous scholar, anti-NATO activist, and leader of the political party Zmiana, Dr. Mateusz Piskorski.
    The full case and details of the indictment remain classified… The National Council of ZMIANA calls for the immediate declassification of the indictment against the Chairman of ZMIANA, Dr. Mateusz Pisorski: “ We believe that this whole affair is unprecedented in the recent history of Poland and is evidence of a lack of freedom of speech and freedom of political beliefs in the Republic evermore often referred to as “NATO’s Eastern Flank” as if the only meaning of our Fatherland’s existence is protecting the interests of the United States.” …
    Dr. Mateusz Piskorski has repeatedly warned against the dangers of a Third World War breaking out over NATO expansion in Eastern Europe and Poland’s degradation into a potential battlefield. …
    Piskorski has been dubbed contemporary Poland’s first political prisoner, and his indictment for alleged espionage behind closed doors could usher in a new era of political repression in NATO-occupied European countries…”
    – There is no available information on the weasel Edward Zalewski, a current National Public Prosecutor, who produced the indictment

    Read More
    • Replies: @EugeneGur
    Thanks for the information. I was wondering what happened to Dr. Pisorski after he was arrested more than a years ago, I think, on ridiculous charges of spying for Russia, and I believe China (!) was also mentioned. As ridiculous as it gets.

    Frankly, the development of the Polish political system towards a totalitarian repressive regime doesn't surprise me in the least. A rabidly nationalistic stance with extreme hostility towards any deviation from the official viewpoint in the interpretation of the historic or political events was to lead to repressions - this was inevitable.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @The Scalpel
    "The troops are asked to sacrifice;...."

    Really? What sacrifice? The troops are welfare queens living a socialist lifestyle. Everything paid for, everything taken care of by the taxpayer. The taxpayers serve the troops if anything. If the troops sacrifice anything, they sacrifice their conscience, that is, if they had one to begin with, which quite likely they did not or they never would have volunteered.

    Here is the deal:

    Mr. Troop, you do whatever we tell you and don't ask any questions and we will pay for everything - food, housing, travel to exotic places, adventure, people constantly kissing your a**. The job is a little dangerous, but no more dangerous than many other jobs you might take for less money, no free health care, no special shopping centers, no free travel, no one kissing your a**, but you having to kiss others'.

    The problem with the armed forces is that members get far more benefits and respect than they deserve. Take that away, and hardly anyone would join up for those somewhat dangerous ridiculous endeavors. The other problems would then solve themselves. Good ole supply and demand.

    I go to baseball games regularly at the local university, and whenever a member of the U.S. military is identified as being in the audience he stands on the home dugout and receives a rousing two-minute standing ovation from virtually ever one of the roughly 3,500 souls assembled. It is beyond bizarre, especially for someone who was on campus during Vietnam. And quite scary.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    I go to baseball games regularly at the local university, and whenever a member of the U.S. military is identified as being in the audience he stands on the home dugout and receives a rousing two-minute standing ovation from virtually ever one of the roughly 3,500 souls assembled. It is beyond bizarre, especially for someone who was on campus during Vietnam. And quite scary.
     
    My dad, who is a WWII veteran in his 90’s, saw heavy combat and received a Purple Heart and still has shrapnel in him from a Japanese grenade. He hates to be thanked for his service and never stands in church on Veterans Day weekend when they ask for veterans to stand. He thinks this glorification of people who “served” is total ludicrous and they should not get any benefits or preference for it. He said no one ever mentioned being in the war, and especially not simply being in the military, when he was younger.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    You will surely be right that having lowers cost of inputs - should improve competitiveness of industries that use them.

    But to go back to the gas discussion, why is keeping the domestic gas price lower (and thereby subsidizing some industries), preferable to exporting more of gas as LNG, and directly managing to 'cash in'.

    I guess the answer would require study comparing the two situations.

    But there seems no intrinsic reason why the former is better.

    And the latter would seem preferable to me, because the result of lower gas prices in America (combined with export restrictions of LNG or I'm not sure what you propose), will be lower gas production other things equal.

    Low domestic gas prices are only a problem if it results in production dropping below domestic demand, with demand substituted by imports.

    Obviously this will not happen since the imports themselves would be LNG, excluding Canadian imports which are benign (and Canada doesn’t have enough reserves to replace American producers in bulk).

    Increased gas production to satisfy export demand will simply result in us running out of gas reserves sooner at the expensive of a smaller heavy industrial production base.

    In the long-term I’m also skeptical of the viability of LNG in any case. With the development of OBOR and Russia’s own efforts it’s inevitable that FSU and Persian Gulf gas will be delivered to East Asia by pipeline.

    It’s also worth pointing out that according to the US Energy Information Agency that China presently has the world’s largest reserves of technically recoverable shale gas. Exploitation is a problem owing to distance from water resources and a lack of technological expertise.

    These are surmountable problems as proven by America’s fracking industry. Both the Eagle Ford and Bakken formations are in dry areas not very close to fresh water, and the fracking industry didn’t even exist at the turn of the century. Dick Cheney promoted invading Iraq because his energy working group predicted that by this time America would be importing 90% of its oil consumption.

    Meanwhile larger and more competitive industries in chemicals, steel, fertilizer, plastics, cement, etc. add more final value and represent a greater overall level of product complexity and technical efficiency. As most of these products are themselves intermediate input goods they’ll increase the competitiveness of our final goods industries as well.

    Another possible use of our gas supremacy is in our world class freight railroad system. Currently this system is diesel-based. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad (a Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary) is currently experimenting with gas-powered locomotives.

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    This is exactly my thinking. I’ve always thought it made exactly zero sense to export raw materials or fossil fuels in the long run. There might be short term reasons for that, but exporters should aim to move away from that and instead add value.

    An example could be Emirates or Qatar Airways. By taking advantage of their fortunate geographic location and the low fuel prices resulting from their hydrocarbon reserves they are selling a service with much higher added value than just exporting oil.
    , @Ali Choudhury
    China (and Asia in general) are going to be severely water-stressed over the next few decades.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @SunBakedSuburb
    " ... whites have every liberty to form their own groups. "

    Not really. If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group. Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer's cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.

    "Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture."

    I will assume you're being sincere: Apparently, you don't follow trends. The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.

    The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint

    if you’re a Brit or Swede who thinks England or Sweden have a right to maintain their ethnic and/or cultural character, then from every orifice of the hive comes the screeching of ‘Nazis! and ‘white supremacists!!!!’

    “RACISTS!!!’

    if you’re a white American who thinks Affirmative Action is wrong and racist and unfair, well then brace yourself for the orgy of hatred and screeching, ‘white supremacists!!!’

    and it goes beyond race now even to include ‘hateful constructs of the patriarchy’; like gender.

    that it’s all prima facie insane, doesn’t get in the way of they’re screeching and hysterics.

    And even here on the Unz Review, there are people who would say that any desire of white Americans to maintain any shred of their (white = racist) culture or heritage, are nothing more than vile “white supremacists”, who must be hounded and harangued for the crime of not hating their own kind (with the kind of visceral, rancorous race-hatred that they hate white people with ; )

    We live in a surreal idiocracy, where the most preposterous idiocies are given credence as if they were anything but the gibbering’s of a drooling lunatic.

    All you have to do is realize they want what you have. White people have created amazing civilizations in Europe and N. America and elsewhere, and it’s only natural that everyone else would want such things for themselves. Duh.

    But where it gets beyond ludicrous/obnoxious is when they demand white people have no right to even exist. Which is their mantra today, because they aren’t laughed out of the room, as they obviously should be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Frederic Bastiat

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge (“see, it’s only thanks to us because of us generous we are!”). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.
     
    FDI was 176 Billion in 2016. Polish GDP was 469 Billion.

    https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/foreign-direct-investment
    https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/gdp

    FDI was 176 Billion in 2016. Polish GDP was 469 Billion.

    China gets around 100-120 billion USD per year in FDI. Who knew that Poland gets 50% more than China with less than 1/20th the population?

    Please, learn basic math first before opining. Your basic common sense should have kicked in long ago when you even typed that comment.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thorfinnsson
    The guy named himself after Frederic Bastiat, what do you expect?

    Bastiat is the same genius who proposed that France should unilaterally disarm, and that this good example would inspire Prussia to disarm.

    Louis Napoleon thought otherwise and wished to expand the French Army to a million men, but his liberal ministers were more inclined to agree with Bastiat's thinking though they didn't go as far as unilateral disarmament.


    Despite his failing health, Napoleon III could see that the Prussian Army, combined with the armies of Bavaria and the other German states, would be a formidable enemy. In 1866, Prussia, with a population of 22 million, had been able to mobilize an army of 700,000 men, while France, with population of 26 million, had an army of only 385,000 men, of whom 100,000 were in Algeria, Mexico, and Rome.[131] In the autumn of 1867, Napoleon III proposed a form of universal military service, similar to the Prussian system, to increase the size of the French Army, if needed, to 1 million. His proposal was opposed by many French officers, such as Marechal Randon, who preferred a smaller, more professional army; he said: "This proposal will only give us recruits; it's soldiers we need."[132] It was also strongly opposed by the republican opposition in the French parliament, who denounced the proposal as a militarization of French society. The republican deputy, Émile Ollivier, who later became Napoleon's prime minister, declared: "The armies of France, which I always considered too large, are now going to be increased to an exorbitant size. Why? What is the necessity? Where is the danger? Who is threatening us? ...If France were to disarm, the Germans would know how to convince their governments to do the same. "[133] Facing almost certain defeat in the parliament, Napoleon III withdrew the proposal. It was replaced in January 1868 by a much more modest project to create a garde mobile, or reserve force, to support the army. [134]
     
    Woops...
    , @Frederic Bastiat
    My mistake. The figure I cited was probably FDI stock. FDI net inflows are much lower, of course. Actual figure is 16 billion.
    https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=PL

    Your basic common sense should have kicked in long ago when you even typed that comment.
     
    I stay corrected.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Mike P

    No one was surprised when Saddam annihilated the 3/7 Cav and fought the 3rd Infantry to a standstill in Baghdad ... until the US could drop a NWC-illegal neutron bomb
     
    That's the first time I hear about this. Are there some good sources to confirm/learn more about it?

    Detailed contemporary accounts by mid-level military seem to have been scrubbed off the web. Here’s a start:

    https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2011/04/09/baghdads-neutron-bomb-and-americas-nuclear-obama/

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/15/vt-nuclear-education-nukes-in-iraq-confirmation/

    Looking at it, Comment 52 is not clear about the sequence. The Battle of Baghdad was during the second US war of aggression against Iraq.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mike P
    Thank you, Wobert.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • Like the Yankee coward he is, Lang hightailed it out of the Unz comment section back to the safety of his own blog where he promptly bans and/or abuses anyone who he disagrees with. This is typical Yankee behavior, cowardly running away and then crowing about victory once they are certain their opponents can no longer reach them.

    http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2018/04/commenter-delusions.html#disqus_thread

    Lang lightly addresses a few comments in this post from the safety of his own blog, but he ignores the stinky pile of elephant dung following him where ever he goes: War Crimes.

    Every year they seem to drag up another poor conscripted German labor camp guard, who as a teenager in 1945 is still somehow guilty of war crimes now. These guys weren’t even officers.

    Lang was in intelligence during Vietnam, when operation Pheonix was in force, which was the equivalent to the Nazi Einsatzgruppen. As the years have passed and the lies have slowly been pealed back about things like Tonkin and the secret bombings, it becomes clear to all non-Yankees that these were egregious war crimes and crimes against humanity. If we consider the complete aftermath of Pol Pot and the fall of Vietnam, the US army has more deaths and crimes to atone for than the German army did, without even considering what has gone on in the middle east since the US recognized Israel, a “country” with no official borders.

    The problem is that there are millions of Yankee war criminals in the US collecting pensions, getting paid for appearances on talk shows, and basking in all that gratitude for their service. Even worse, they form little clubs, like SST, where they pat each other on the back and exchange tidbits of war criminal manna. I am referring to “intelligence”.

    This entire Comey/McCabe/Muller/Clinton kubuki theatre that we are forced to endure revolves around “classified” information. Information that only these insiders are allowed to know about, which is clearly sold and leaked at will by those at the top of the food chain. This is the military war criminal manna. They can use and profit from this secret knowledge for decades after they have left “service”.

    In Lang’s case, he can post juicy tidbits on his blog that he shares with other insider Yankee war criminals and know that the public will come to learn these great secrets, despite the abuse he heaps on anyone who questions anything they are told because of his deep insider knowledge.

    So now that we finally know what a sham all this “top secret” information is, I would propose that it be used a the criteria for determining war crimes when the US finally faces judgment on the misery she has created for humanity. Low level security clearance means a couple of very hungry years in a re-education camp. High level security clearance means testicle crushing to extract forced confessions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    Lang hightailed it out of the Unz comment section back to the safety of his own blog where he promptly bans and/or abuses anyone who he disagrees with.
     
    Not before making an ass of himself in this comment section.

    His loss. That's why unz.com is growing and the colonel's blog is a tiny circle-jerk, like a thousand other circle-jerks on the WWW. The supply-demand ratio is not in his favour. Ah, well...
    , @RobinG
    Whew! Thanks for the link. I'd like to claim the title of "more zany commenter" for coining the phrase 'corpses in his closet' ... but that honor goes to bjondo. ["In addition to corpses in his closet, wonder how much looted Russian loot in his off-shore account(s)?"]

    Trouble is, bjondo and I were referring to Jeffrey Sachs. Pat Lang must believe every comment under his article is about him. Sad. One can only hope he reads his “top secret” “classified” information more carefully.

    Meanwhile, he chose not to respond to my genuine concern. Why is he entitled (if he did) to castigate Larry Wilkerson...[pot calling kettle].? Why should Lang be forgiven, Wilkerson not? And BTW, Lang seems to have no remorse, so why forgive him at all?

    As for the rest of his "Commenter Delusions" you're quite right, Heros. Seems the man won't tolerate to hear any other view than precisely his own.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @annamaria
    "PERSONALIZED, INDIVIDUALIZED punishment is needed for the neocon criminals and their MSM stooges"
    -- Agree. The ill-gotten fortunes must be reappropriated from the criminals' progeny and invested into the restoration of the damaged countries.

    IN ADDITION to the punishment of the criminals themselves.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @utu
    If Ron Und has $10,000 burning his pocket instead of paying the lazy bum Revusky he could hire a PI to do the research on Betty Ong by getting vital records of Betty Ong and interview some real people and do what Revusky, the great believer in crisis actors and non-existent people never intended to do.

    the lazy bum Revusky

    Utu, you pathetic dumbass… by your logic, if you took your car to a mechanic specifically for an oil change, and he did just that, changed the oil, he would be a “lazy bum” because he did not take the opportunity to rebuild your car’s engine!

    The wager with Unz was specifically about whether Betty Ong was in the appropriate high school yearbook. To say that I’m lazy because I resolved that question and didn’t go further makes no sense really.

    Now, granted, as the scriptures say, out of the mouths of dumbasses can come words of wisdom, so you do make a valid point about hiring a private investigator. Assuming one really did want to resolve the Betty Ong question thoroughly, I guess that is what one would do — as opposed to insisting that I, somebody who is not any sort of professional investigator, do it.

    So, yes, I would be perfectly happy if Ron hired a PI to do just that. However, he really ought to pay off on this wager to me first.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu

    However, he really ought to pay off on this wager to me first.
     
    No he should not. You must get a hard copies of yearbooks. The digital copy can be altered by people like you. It is possible you did tin order to swindle Ron Unz. I am not saying you did it but it is possible. He clearly stated (presuming that what you cite indeed came from his email) that you should spend $500 or so and get the hard copy. You did not because you are a lazy bum. You kept talking about Betty Ong for years and did nothing to verify it until you got somewhat motivated by the prospect of the $10k. Still not motivated enough to do something really substantial. You are a lazy bum who never really cared for what you professed. Your talk is cheap like almost everybody on internet on both sides of the 9/11 debate.
    , @Anon

    The wager with Unz was specifically about whether Betty Ong was in the appropriate high school yearbook. To say that I’m lazy because I resolved that question and didn’t go further makes no sense really.


     

    You didn't resolve the question. Do you see why not?

    I guess that is what one would do — as opposed to insisting that I, somebody who is not any sort of professional investigator, do it.
     

    You wrote a 4100 word article about something. It seems you are interested in, again, something. But what? If you wanted to cover your "wager" (is it a wager-- heads I win, tails we forget the whole thing?) you could do it in one sentence: "I looked at an online copy of the GWHS San Fran. yearbook and there is no Betty Ong though there is a Betty Ng whom I believe to be someone else". What was purpose of other 4069 words? To convince someone of something?

    But okay, you're not going to do it. That's okay. But why get so het up about it? This I don't understand. Just "Thanks but I'm not interested in pursuing the matter further" would do.

    Then you could get on to more important things, possibly including your next article which would further the goal of the other 4000-word part of this article.

    , @NoseytheDuke
    Have you considered putting a classified ad in a local paper or a listing on Craig's List in the Bay Area offering a reward for a hard copy of the yearbook? I would think that $500 would flush one out, assuming one still exists.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • Anon[248] • Disclaimer says:
    @Your Proofreader
    Errata:

    "War is evil/wrong/stupid/." No, war is criminal. See Rome Statute Articles 8 bis, 15 bis and 15 ter, which restate universal jurisdiction law for an independent jurisdiction. Use of force in manifest breach of the UN Charter is the gravest crime.

    "Now, the nation that has created this military system is not some 'shithole country.'" Yes it is. For your convenience OHCHR has compiled a handy comparative shithole map that clearly shows that your country is the biggest, most bouyant turd in the underdevelopment shithole, bobbing and reeking with Myanmar, Arab headchoppers, and a few atavistic African presidents-for-life. The big picture is apt to trigger indoctrinated reactions of dismissal, but you can drill down and examine the exhaustive supporting documentation compiled by independent experts and domestic civil society.

    http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Indicators/Pages/HRIndicatorsIndex.aspx

    "We need a military system that accurately prioritizes actual and emerging threats." No we don't. The US government's fixation on threats is how the military metastasizes. Furthermore, we don't need a military system at all. Costa Rica does just fine without one, and they're a softer target than the US.

    "The root cause of our predicament is the all-volunteer force." So, you're going to fix our criminal-aggression 'predicament' by forcing every adult to fight with criminal penalties for non-compliance? This is how cognitive dissidence causes rational people to stop following their logical nose and veer off into idiocy.

    So now that we've cleared away the cruft of residual state indoctrination with which Bacevich is valiantly struggling, we can talk turkey. The solution is simple. We need a law 'n order president. The law and order the president enforces is to include UN Charter articles 2(4) and 51, ICCPR Article 20, and A/RES/25/2625. We had a president like that, JFK, but CIA shot him. Our next law 'n order president must first do what Jack Kennedy wanted to do, until CIA murdered him: break CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds. That is a regime change. So any future law 'n order president will by necessity be appointed by the victors of the last war our fatass loser military loses. The victors will impose command responsibility for US aggression (that in itself will decimate CIA and the flag ranks.) The victors will end CIA's COG state-of-emergency regime and replace this obsolete dead-letter constitution with the UN Charter, the core human rights instruments, the International Bill of Human Rights, and the Rome Statute.

    LOL this guy wants us to treat the OHCHR seriously. I bet he thinks the Canadian CHRC is also a legitimate body we should all defer to.

    “we can talk turkey.” OK let’s. Your irrelevant and (frankly insulting to our intelligence) commentary spoken as some UN plutocrat treating the US and Haiti as equal with equal standards is about as dumb as the gentleman above who wants us to think “half the US population has hispanic roots” or that we never “USA diversity never made room for the native americans”.

    Your slimy globalism is showing, Pooftareader, no matter how many times you try to use expressions like “Arab headchoppers” to try, in your wormy manner, to fit in with how you think dissident nationalists talk.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Your Proofreader
    So. The fact that the USA fails to meet the standards applied to Haiti and every other country means... What, that the USA deserves special eeeasy American self-esteeeem standards? "Here's your gold sticker, Jimmy, everybody's a winner in the the Special Yooman Rights Olympics!!" Face it, your police state stuffed your helpless masses down a shithole.

    Globalism...? Get it straight, globalism is different than the old-school Eastern seaboard internationalism you just encountered, which upsets you so.

    What exactly is your hardon for the OHCHR? They put your government on the spot in a way that your media doesn't dare do, that your legislature doesn't dare do, that your civil society doesn't dare do. They've got more balls than your entire subject population. You obviously need their help, since you can't escape your patriotic icecreamhole.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @EliteCommInc.
    I am an unashamed advocate of the draft to ameliorate the primary dynamic in question.

    I must be stupid, because I don’t understand what you mean.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Sean
    Well, the US army planners of the first Gulf War are the ones ultimately responsible. According to Bruce Gudmundsson Saddam was not overthrown because the gas guzzling tanks rate of consumption meant they had to stop before nvading Iraq or run out of fuel, others say it was a policy decision at presidential level. I think the US army made sure they would not be sent into Iraq by not taking enough fuel. Or maybe it was April Glaspie to blame:she failed to warm Saddam of the the reaction to him invading Iraq, and he never would have tried it if he had been properly told what would happen. One Bonesman Bush pres to set up Saddam and another to topple him. Could have been a long term plan.

    One Bonesman Bush pres to set up Saddam and another to topple him. Could have been a long term plan.

    I am pretty sure that if Bush Sr. went all the way the planners would be happy. For some reason he did not go and so he paid the price for it by not getting the second term. The planners or the TPTB were not too happy with Bush Sr., who riding on the highest approval ratings (90%) after the war decided to confront and challenge Yitzhak Shamir but then lost his nerve and instead of turning to American people backed off. Bush Sr. seemed to be very reluctant to go to war and it was only after his meeting with Margaret Thatcher in Aspen, Colorado that the decision to go to war was announced.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cold N. Holefield

    For some reason he did not go and so he paid the price for it by not getting the second term.
     
    George Herbert Walker Bush, Bush Sr., was at the center of The Deep State for a very long time. As such, The Deep State then wasn't as Psychotically Insane as it is now. Psychopathic, for sure, but not yet Psychopathically Insane.

    Listen to Cheney in '94 about the reasons for not going all the way to Baghdad. It's the one time I have ever agreed with Cheney. This one time. He was right. And then 10 years later he went off his Meds and went against his own sound advice and threw America head-first into The Middle East Quagmire.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Sean
    Well, the US army planners of the first Gulf War are the ones ultimately responsible. According to Bruce Gudmundsson Saddam was not overthrown because the gas guzzling tanks rate of consumption meant they had to stop before nvading Iraq or run out of fuel, others say it was a policy decision at presidential level. I think the US army made sure they would not be sent into Iraq by not taking enough fuel. Or maybe it was April Glaspie to blame:she failed to warm Saddam of the the reaction to him invading Iraq, and he never would have tried it if he had been properly told what would happen. One Bonesman Bush pres to set up Saddam and another to topple him. Could have been a long term plan.

    April Glaspie to blame:she failed to warm Saddam of the the reaction to him invading Iraq

    Glaspie was used as a chump to rope-a-dope Saddam into bungling into Kuwait, so that the ZUS could act ‘shocked, shocked’, and then disabuse him of the chemical and other weapons the ZUS had given him to use specifically on Persians/Iran.

    she called the characterization that it was her idea to lie to Saddam a “deliberate deception on a major scale”.

    Ross Perot:

    “…we told him (Saddam) he could take the northern part of Kuwait; and when he took the whole thing we went nuts. And if we didn’t tell him that, why won’t we even let the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee see the written instructions for Ambassador Glaspie?”

    Could have been a long term plan.

    since it’s all part and parcel of Zionism, then of course it’s all part of a long term scheme to create a global Orwellian dystopia. Duh.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • “The root cause of our predicament is the all-volunteer force.”

    Just before WWI various reforms were made that made entering into and maintaining a war easier. Most notably direct election of senators and the federal reserve bank. If you are looking to root causes, start with those. While the direct election of senators did not stop the US from getting into wars, it does seem to have made maintaining the war difficult or even impossible.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Uebersetzer
    There was a gigantic, organised slaughter of European Jews in the 1940s. I did research in two apparently unrelated areas to it and curiously enough, Jewish victims of the Nazis are present.
    1. The Good Soldier Svejk by the Czech writer Jaroslav Hasek. A character in the novel is a Cadet Biegler. Many characters were based on real-life characters known to the author. One of them was Hans Bigler.
    http://honsi.org/literature/svejk/?page=11&lang=en#Bigler
    Bigler's father Eduard was killed in Bergen-Belsen in 1944, on account of being Jewish. It is not clear whether Hans Bigler was fully Jewish or part-Jewish although the latter is more likely - half-Jews generally speaking survived the Nazi era although they were despised as Mischlinge. Hans Bigler seems to have attributed his own survival to an Allied air raid on Dresden, where he then lived, destroying Gestapo records.
    2. A Nazi-era (1937) German film called Unternehmen Michael set during the German offensives of 1918. A supporting role in the film was played by the actor Paul Otto. Otto was in fact Jewish but this was not discovered until 1943. When it was discovered, Otto committed suicide with his wife shortly before being deported to the "East".
    If the Holocaust was a hoax, why was Eduard Bigler killed? And why did a respected German actor like Paul Otto opt for suicide when he was discovered to be of Jewish origin and about to be deported to Auschwitz, Treblinka or some such destination?
    https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0653288/?ref_=tt_cl_t2

    Bigler’s father Eduard was killed in Bergen-Belsen in 1944, on account of being Jewish.

    Uebersetzer, even according to the official Holocaustian narrative, Bergen-Belsen was never an extermination camp. The people who were transported there (the most famous case being Anne Frank) died of typhus and other opportunistic diseases.

    Moreover, the terrible conditions at Belsen and Buchenwald (which, again, are not deemed by even the official history to have been extermination camps) arose because of the terrible conditions prevalent in Germany at the time.

    But really, it would be better to know what you’re talking about. You can’t pull out Bergen-Belsen as an example to support the core narrative of extermination in gas chambers when even the official court historians are saying that Belsen wasn’t that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Inspectors from the Organization for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) have finally arrived in Douma, Syria, to assess whether a gas attack took place earlier this month. It has taken a week for the inspectors to begin their work, as charges were thrown back and forth about who was causing the delay.Proponents of the...
  • Russia/Syria: Send weapons inspectors because we have nothing to hide

    US/Britain/France: Bomb the sites before weapons inspectors arrive because we know there are weapons.

    Which seems more plausible?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @RadicalCenter
    Yes. A prescient warning about the folly of Turkish EU membership.

    Austria would be the first to go not only Muslim but simply Turkish. Turks by the millions would flock to Austria and Germany to join their large kin networks that are already in place. Already Austria, with its tiny population and consistently low fertility rate, was on the road to drastic demographic and cultural change in the near future. Beautiful Vienna will be a more savage, intolerant place ruled by sharia:

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4229/austria-muslims-vienna-schools

    That column was written four years ago. The population numbers are slightly worse now.

    What did all those brave men suffer and die for at the gates of Vienna in the 1600s and centuries before?

    What did all those brave men suffer and die for at the gates of Vienna in the 1600s and centuries before?

    What did all those brave Roman men suffer and die for at the gates of Anatolia in the 900s and centuries before?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    "So that a man's right to publicly dress up as a fruity Roman soldier shall not perish from this Earth!"
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/4549794-3x2-940x627.jpg

    If it weren't for those darned Turks, it would be happening in Constantinople too!
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/7545282-3x2-940x627.jpg
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-27/turkish-anti-riot-police-officers-disperse-lgbt-community/7545284

    "So that the poz shall perish from the Earth!"

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    Jonathan, if you really want to pursue this I have a few thoughts.

    They don’t come from the internet they come from an original source, me.

    Like non existent Betty Ong and her crisis actor siblings I’m born, raised and lived most of my life in San Francisco.

    So I don’t need google maps or any other internet source.

    Like most people on this site, I picked up somewhere that Betty Ong went to George Washington High on 32nd Avenue a couple blocks from Geary in the outer Richmond district of San Francisco. I lived less than a mile north of that school.

    I assumed that because she went to Washington she and her family lived in the outer Richmond.

    I just read the Wikipedia entry. It says she grew up in Chinatown. Now, Chinatown is about 5 miles from Washington High. And whether by car or bus it’s a ghastly trip. By car it takes a good hour during week day traffic.

    To get there by bus it would involve 2 buses and a cable car. It would take an hour or more twice a day. After the cable car she would have to wait at the Geary st bus stop.

    It’s horrible, especially when it rains. Picture 50 people trying to crowd unto the Geary st bus. Then the horrible crowded awful bus that goes about 5 miles an hour till it gets west of Van Ness.

    Now, why would she or her parents want her to waste 2 to 3 hours a day to go to a perfectly ordinary average public high school when there is an ordinary public school, Galileo right in Chinatown?

    If her parents sent her to Mercy SF or St Rose or Lick-Wilmerding or another private school in western SF the horrible commute would be worth it.

    But to go to Washington? Unless it was a forced bussing thing.
    Someone found a Gloria Ong graduated 1972 from Galileo the Chinatown high school. That’s the right name and age of the sister.

    Revulsky found an inter net Washington yearbook and the only Betty Ong was black.

    There are about 75 private and public high schools in SF. St Rose closed after the 1989 earthquake. Many of the private schools opened after Betty Ong was high school age. Does anyone want to search all those schools? Not me

    Go ahead Sparkon, use your wonderful google skills and tell me how I am wrong about how to to get from Chinatown to the outer Richmond.

    Your pontificating about cities you’ve never been to is ridiculous. You should be embarrassed

    Now, Chinatown is about 5 miles from Washington High. And whether by car or bus it’s a ghastly trip. By car it takes a good hour during week day traffic.

    Well, I just checked Google Maps out of curiosity and I had it generate a route, using public transportation, from the Golden Gate Fortune Cookie Factory, just off Jackson Street, in the heart of Chinatown, to George Washington High School, which it estimates to take 46 minutes.

    In general, I find Google Maps to give a safe estimate so it probably takes a few minutes less than that in practice. For one thing, Google Maps typically assumes a pretty decrepit walking pace. I am sure the 9 minutes walking component of the route would be covered by healthy teenagers in a few minutes less than that. The 37 minute bus ride part, of course, probably is (and was) a 37 minute bus ride….

    It’s horrible, especially when it rains. Picture 50 people trying to crowd unto the Geary st bus. Then the horrible crowded awful bus that goes about 5 miles an hour till it gets west of Van Ness.

    Holy Cow! That reminds me of the trains that transported people to Auschwitz! Holy shit! Did they have gas chambers there too? Poor Betty!

    Well, if Betty had claustrophobia, I guess she could ride a bicycle. Google Maps gives that as a 43 minute bike ride. And again, it’s probably a bit less than 43 minutes for a healthy teenager.

    But hold on a second, what is all this about anyway? The wager with Ron Unz that lies at the origin of this article was based on fact-checking a story that appeared in the media, and that story said Betty went to this high school. George Washington High. Are you saying she didn’t go there because it is not feasible to commute for 40-odd minutes? WTF?

    Not only that, this Betty Ong, famous for the phone call on 9/11 (and absolutely nothing else) has now passed into the lore of George Washington High School as their most distinguished alumnus. For example, I noticed that they had a 75th anniversary celebration in 2011 and that had its own website. Here:

    http://www.gwhs75thanniversary.com/

    Look at the face at the very top of the page! And note that some other famous people went to this school apparently but they take second billing to Betty! The black poet Maya Angelou (who recited her work at at least one presidential inauguration) apparently was there in the 40′s. Her picture is there but way below Betty Ong’s. The singer Johnny Mathis went to George Washington High. (He’s not black, like Maya Angelou, but is pretty seriously gay apparently….) These people come AFTER Betty!

    So the most distinguished alumnus of George Washington High according to the institution itself is deemed to be Betty Ong!

    Ain’t that something?

    Someone found a Gloria Ong graduated 1972 from Galileo the Chinatown high school. That’s the right name and age of the sister.

    Someone found that, huh? Did that person provide a link?

    Anyway, if the Ong family all went to Galileo, why is that school not raising a stink about it? They’re not claiming Betty Ong (famous for the phone call) or Gloria Ong (famous for being the sister of the Betty of the phone call) went there. Why don’t the various students and teachers who presumably knew Betty and her siblings at Galileo High raise some stink about this mistake?

    Anyway, I am not the one who claims that Betty Ong went to this school. (I kinda doubt it frankly.) I’m just checking a fact that appeared in a lot of different places in the MSM. And Ron’s wager, of course, was based on the idea that Ronnie can’t conceive of such a widely reported “fact” not being so! So he never thought his $10,000 was at any real risk! (Think again, Ronnie…)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    That 37 minutes estimate is only valid from 1 to 5 am.

    And you don’t know her address in Chinatown. It involves a lot more than just the Geary bus
    , @Cold N. Holefield

    Anyway, I am not the one who claims that Betty Ong went to this school. (I kinda doubt it frankly.) I’m just checking a fact that appeared in a lot of different places in the MSM. And Ron’s wager, of course, was based on the idea that Ronnie can’t conceive of such a widely reported “fact” not being so! So he never thought his $10,000 was at any real risk! (Think again, Ronnie…)
     
    But bizarrely George Washington High School, per your 75th Anniversary Link, contends she did attend their school even though she's not listed in the Yearbook. Perhaps George Washington High School can provide copies of her Original Transcripts since she isn't shown in the Yearbook.

    What is it with the Chinese and these Terrorist Spectacle Events? Dun Meng's claim he was carjacked by the alleged Boston Bombers is also a bizarre story. And then we have the steel from the World Trade Center site being quickly disposed of to a Chinese Company, Baosteel. At least they were smart enough not to sell it to an Israeli Company. That would have been a bit too audacious, I suppose.

    Mangled WTC Steel Bought By China

    On a lighter note, nobody names their daughters Betty anymore. Or Barbara. Thank goodness.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @redmudhooch
    Oops, forgot the video, Watch this video at 4:20, 5:40, 6:40
    Those are explosions, below the falling top, even the reporters agree!

    https://youtu.be/qhyu-fZ2nRA

    How anyone in his right mind can characterize this as a “collapse” is beyond me. It simply beggars the imagination that people could be THAT stupid.

    “Thus compromised, the trusses give way.” Since when does “giving way” involve explosions and the disintegration of steel and concrete?

    Total, unadulterated bullshit of the most egregious kind.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Dogs of war
    The USA has inherited the pirate genes of England , plus the brutal genes of militaristic germans , thats all for " diversity " .

    USA " diversity " never made room for the native americans , for the hispanic roots of half of the country ........

    Can’t tell if this a bad troll or you’re just very, very out of your depth at this website?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Antonio
    "I don’t know about you, but I worry more about the implications of China’s rise and Russian misbehavior"

    I stopped reading here.

    It’s an arrogant comment. What the author wants is to reinstate the draft.

    Let those who want college tuition and free medical care enlist and get it. Let those who want to stay out of the military stays out.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Antonio
    What the author wants I don't know, but a great part of what he wrote is Empire's propaganda or outright nonsense, as other commentators also pointed out. The rest is more or less OK. For example, all the part about the "petulant, overarmed, misbehaved Russia" and Murica's best-in-world-history military are BS propaganda.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Rurik

    to one of these NeoConscripts
     
    blow me blubber lips

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @peterAUS

    The reason why most people chose to believe this soap opera,-Putin/Russia opposing , fighting the “Anglo Zionist” empire – is because they take their wish, hope for reality.
     
    Agree, up to a point.

    Putin/Russia are fighting the "Anglo Zionist" empire because the same empire simply wishes to dispose of the regime in Kremlin and take over the country as it's taken over all those smaller countries in its expansion to East.
    They are not fighting the same system. Say, should the empire goes down tomorrow, "Team Putin" will want to replace U.S. deep state in a second.

    Two mobsters in a turf war.
    Both criminals, still.

    My take anyway.

    Putin/Russia are fighting the “Anglo Zionist” empire because the same empire simply wishes to dispose of the regime in Kremlin and take over the country

    This means that Russia is fighting a defensive war and the West the war of aggression, which by definition makes Russia right and the West wrong.

    Two mobsters in a turf war.

    For the Russians “the turf”, as you put it, is our own country and we do defend it. It’s the oldest trick in the book – to equate the aggressor and the defender because they both use military means. In reality, there is only one mafia here, and it isn’t Russia.

    should the empire goes down tomorrow, “Team Putin” will want to replace U.S. deep state in a second.

    That we do not know. The only thing we do know is what is going on right before our eyes: the US and the entire West behaving like a gangster disregarding any and every rule of civilized behavior and endangering everyone, and Russia acting as the only adult in the room. The rest is a transparent attempt to justify the West’s behavior: the West isn’t to blame, for”both sides are equally bad”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    The US-style “democracy on the march” in Poland, the obedient vassal of the ZUSA: https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/04/breaking-polish-political-prisoner-mateusz-piskorski-to-be-charged-with-espionage-for-russia/
    “The Polish National Prosecutor’s Office has issued an indictment against the famous scholar, anti-NATO activist, and leader of the political party Zmiana, Dr. Mateusz Piskorski.
    The full case and details of the indictment remain classified… The National Council of ZMIANA calls for the immediate declassification of the indictment against the Chairman of ZMIANA, Dr. Mateusz Pisorski: “ We believe that this whole affair is unprecedented in the recent history of Poland and is evidence of a lack of freedom of speech and freedom of political beliefs in the Republic evermore often referred to as “NATO’s Eastern Flank” as if the only meaning of our Fatherland’s existence is protecting the interests of the United States." …
    Dr. Mateusz Piskorski has repeatedly warned against the dangers of a Third World War breaking out over NATO expansion in Eastern Europe and Poland’s degradation into a potential battlefield. …
    Piskorski has been dubbed contemporary Poland’s first political prisoner, and his indictment for alleged espionage behind closed doors could usher in a new era of political repression in NATO-occupied European countries…”
    -- There is no available information on the weasel Edward Zalewski, a current National Public Prosecutor, who produced the indictment
    , @peterAUS

    This means that Russia is fighting a defensive war and the West the war of aggression, which by definition makes Russia right and the West wrong.
     
    Some people don't equate the regime in Kremlin with Russia.

    For the Russians “the turf”, as you put it, is our own country and we do defend it.
     
    Nobody was attacking Russia last time (5 minutes ago) I checked.
    Last time it happened '41. At least you people are fond of regurgitating that all the time.

    That we do not know.
     
    Some of us do. We also aren't bad in history either. Like remembering USSR expansion into Europe.We simply don't like to see another.
    "Do not trust Moscow". Short and simple. Keyword "trust".

    We made our positions clear.
    Let's move on.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    With all respect for civilized and secular Turks who also exist - overall, you could not achieve a faster way to turn Western Europe into an Islamic zone, than accession of Turkey (and her huge population) to Schengen Area.

    Yes. A prescient warning about the folly of Turkish EU membership.

    Austria would be the first to go not only Muslim but simply Turkish. Turks by the millions would flock to Austria and Germany to join their large kin networks that are already in place. Already Austria, with its tiny population and consistently low fertility rate, was on the road to drastic demographic and cultural change in the near future. Beautiful Vienna will be a more savage, intolerant place ruled by sharia:

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4229/austria-muslims-vienna-schools

    That column was written four years ago. The population numbers are slightly worse now.

    What did all those brave men suffer and die for at the gates of Vienna in the 1600s and centuries before?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mitleser

    What did all those brave men suffer and die for at the gates of Vienna in the 1600s and centuries before?
     
    What did all those brave Roman men suffer and die for at the gates of Anatolia in the 900s and centuries before?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Introduction President Trump cancelled his attendance at the Summit of the Americas meeting of all the 35 presidents of the region designed to debate and formulate a common policy. Trump delegated Vice President Michael Pence in his place. VP Pence a known nonentity with zero experience and even less knowledge of Latin America – US...
  • This is one of unz.com’s more muddled efforts, like something from Mother Jones during the Reagan Administration. The Soviet Union blew up along with its efforts to install or support Marxist regimes in the Americas, so the author’s fever dreams about Trump–one year in office–funding “death squads” and masterminding coups are really dated. Central and South American countries are artificial, post-imperial constructs which historically lurch between clumsy pseudo-fascism and crude bolshevism. They probably always will. They’ve also always been easy marks for cheap credit and bad economics, long before Trump.

    The Monroe Doctrine is perfectly rational in the same way that Russia and China–the only other two countries that actually matter–seek their respective spheres of influence. It only seems less relevant since the old European powers were kicked out long ago and the Soviets are gone and no longer funding Trotskyism. I’m sure the Chinese have a lot of activity southward but it doesn’t seem problematic for the US so far.

    If anything, US national security and foreign policy institutions are too disengaged from Central and South America because they’re chasing dragons all over the Middle East.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • “The troops are asked to sacrifice;….”

    Really? What sacrifice? The troops are welfare queens living a socialist lifestyle. Everything paid for, everything taken care of by the taxpayer. The taxpayers serve the troops if anything. If the troops sacrifice anything, they sacrifice their conscience, that is, if they had one to begin with, which quite likely they did not or they never would have volunteered.

    Here is the deal:

    Mr. Troop, you do whatever we tell you and don’t ask any questions and we will pay for everything – food, housing, travel to exotic places, adventure, people constantly kissing your a**. The job is a little dangerous, but no more dangerous than many other jobs you might take for less money, no free health care, no special shopping centers, no free travel, no one kissing your a**, but you having to kiss others’.

    The problem with the armed forces is that members get far more benefits and respect than they deserve. Take that away, and hardly anyone would join up for those somewhat dangerous ridiculous endeavors. The other problems would then solve themselves. Good ole supply and demand.

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @gsjackson
    I go to baseball games regularly at the local university, and whenever a member of the U.S. military is identified as being in the audience he stands on the home dugout and receives a rousing two-minute standing ovation from virtually ever one of the roughly 3,500 souls assembled. It is beyond bizarre, especially for someone who was on campus during Vietnam. And quite scary.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Sean
    I don't know anything "FOR SURE" and neither do you. No one in this world does because no one may have absolute verification of data, no matter how loudly and persistently they call for it. It is not empirically verifiable that a Brotherhood of the Bell type organisation (Skull and Bones according to Anthony P. Sutton ) does not deliberately create enemies such as Hitler and Stalin all the better to forment war and control America. Nor is it "for sure" that anyone died in 9/11, which may have been staged by the cia chief two presidents and a senator Bonesmen Bush clan, maybe the victims were not 100% veritably real people because 9/11 never actually happened.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gulf_War_Did_Not_Take_Place

    The essays in Libération and The Guardian were published before, during and after the Gulf War and they were titled accordingly: during the American military and rhetorical buildup as "The Gulf War Will not take Place"; during military action as "The Gulf War is not Taking Place", and after action was over, "The Gulf War Did Not Take Place".
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality#Simulacrum
    In his work Simulacra and Simulation, Baudrillard argues the "imaginary world" of Disneyland magnetizes people inside and has been presented as "imaginary" to make people believe that all its surroundings are "real". But he believes that the Los Angeles area is not real; thus it is hyperreal. Disneyland is a set of apparatuses which tries to bring imagination and fiction to what is called "real". This concerns the American values and way of life in a sense and "concealing the fact that the real is no longer real, and thus of saving the reality principle."[19]

    "The Disneyland imaginary is neither true or false: it is a deterrence machine set up in order to rejuvenate in reverse the fiction of the real. Whence the debility, the infantile degeneration of this imaginary. It's meant to be an infantile world, in order to make us believe that the adults are elsewhere, in the "real" world, and to conceal the fact that real childishness is everywhere, particularly among those adults who go there to act the child in order to foster illusions of their real childishness."
     

     
    Its possible at the centre of the huddle of south pole Emperor penguins is always the same bunch of free riders, and a secret organisation running the USA stays in power whatever happens.

    I don’t know anything “FOR SURE” and neither do you. No one in this world does because no one may have absolute verification of data, no matter how loudly and persistently they call for it.

    This is true. Nevertheless some narratives are considered more true, more known, more factual than others. Truth in this context is merely a rhetorical device. Who poses the truth wins. But in fact it is the other way around: who wins poses the truth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    According to Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying In International Politics by John J. Mearsheimer (Oxford University Press) Lying isn't necessary, useful or even possible most of the time.
    A False Flag 9/11 would require total mastery of US government, intelligence security, police, and most crucially the army, which could always stage a coup. It just isn't that easy to be make a selfish penguin conspiracy work. A nation state is not as sophisticated as a bunch on penguins.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Washington Wobert
    Tom Dispatch left gatekeeping is like confirmation. A bunch of horny adolescents straggle into church holding prayer books in front of their out-of-control erumpent boners and say ridiculous nonsense in public. But Tom Dispatch goes beyond ordinary ridiculous nonsense like the holy spirit's gonna get me, or I'm gonna commit cannibalism on christ:

    "By common consent, the United States today has the world’s best military"

    Where to begin? Back before the first Iraq war, this former death merchant modeled the industrial base for modern munitions. Long story short, it was pitifully inadequate. Any real mobilization would grind to a halt to retool extensive civilian assets, diverting resources at the cost, if you're lucky, of a severe recession (if you're outa luck inflation spikes too.) Static analysis with Leontief models show this. The dynamics are worse.

    When the US regime went to war anyway, the inevitable happened. We all watched rusty national guard artillery get towed, not to the scrapyard where it belonged, but to the nearest airbase to blow up and get dumped in Iraq. No one was surprised when Saddam annihilated the 3/7 Cav and fought the 3rd Infantry to a standstill in Baghdad (That's partly because no one was allowed to know about it. Massive OPSEC saved the day by hiding the rout from the US public until the US could drop a NWC-illegal neutron bomb.) Then the recession hit and our DCI head of state got canned. Then came a decade-long genocidal blockade, then the troops took a mulligan and the USA lost again - this time to Iran, who wasn't even fighting.

    The defense industrial base is now hollower and crookeder than ever. Institutionalized graft keeps it going as productivity decays. Russia just put it out of its misery.

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2018/04/23/proven-americas-f35-junk-against-russia-syria/

    Common consent. I got your common consent here in my pants.

    No one was surprised when Saddam annihilated the 3/7 Cav and fought the 3rd Infantry to a standstill in Baghdad … until the US could drop a NWC-illegal neutron bomb

    That’s the first time I hear about this. Are there some good sources to confirm/learn more about it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Washington Wobert
    Detailed contemporary accounts by mid-level military seem to have been scrubbed off the web. Here's a start:

    https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2011/04/09/baghdads-neutron-bomb-and-americas-nuclear-obama/

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/15/vt-nuclear-education-nukes-in-iraq-confirmation/

    Looking at it, Comment 52 is not clear about the sequence. The Battle of Baghdad was during the second US war of aggression against Iraq.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    The best solution for a significant proportion - especially young people, who want a job where they can afford a normal life.

    The main emigration is to Russian Federation, although I'm not sure if there is data available on the exact number of work permits issued each year.

    There are probably as many, ,or more, Armenians in Russia at any single time, than in Armenia.

    Seems right. I have met two Armenians who were born and raised in Moscow, one now settled in Glendale CA and the other in Burbank CA.

    I’d guess there are as many Armenians in the USA as in Yerevan (a million), with at least 250-300,000 of those in Glendale-LA Area alone (LA and cities bordering LA to the north such as Burbank, Montrose, and La Crescenta).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thorfinnsson
    Sure, and I've long maintained that human capital trumps natural capital.

    And generally machinery (if we could somehow separate it from the kn0w-how needed to operate) trumps natural capital.

    But there's no reason to ignore the role of natural capital. The choice between processing natural gas into higher value-added products like chemicals, fertilizer, steel, fiberglas, etc. vs. simply exporting it makes it clear the former is more valuable.

    Keeping input costs low (without subsidies) is a form of low-hanging fruit. Capital and know-how on the other hand take more time to build up.

    And while the investment into know-how, farm machinery, improved genetics, etc. are obviously very important for why America is the world's largest food exporter, it should also be noted that we have more arable land than any other country in the world. #2 and #3 in arable land area are India and China, who for obvious reasons can't export as much food as us. #4 is Russia who with its smaller population perhaps will one day export as much as us (already has surpassed us in wheat exports).

    Even here my thinking is relevant. The #1 cash crop in America is corn (maize). A huge fraction of this is wastefully turned into sugar and fuel substitutes. In the absence of our bullshit ethanol and HFCS industries, we would export far more food.

    If you want a real investment story for agricultural success look to the world's second agro-exporter...which amazingly is the tiny country of the Netherlands.

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/09/holland-agriculture-sustainable-farming/

    You will surely be right that having lowers cost of inputs – should improve competitiveness of industries that use them.

    But to go back to the gas discussion, why is keeping the domestic gas price lower (and thereby subsidizing some industries), preferable to exporting more of gas as LNG, and directly managing to ‘cash in’.

    I guess the answer would require study comparing the two situations.

    But there seems no intrinsic reason why the former is better.

    And the latter would seem preferable to me, because the result of lower gas prices in America (combined with export restrictions of LNG or I’m not sure what you propose), will be lower gas production other things equal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thorfinnsson
    Low domestic gas prices are only a problem if it results in production dropping below domestic demand, with demand substituted by imports.

    Obviously this will not happen since the imports themselves would be LNG, excluding Canadian imports which are benign (and Canada doesn't have enough reserves to replace American producers in bulk).

    Increased gas production to satisfy export demand will simply result in us running out of gas reserves sooner at the expensive of a smaller heavy industrial production base.

    In the long-term I'm also skeptical of the viability of LNG in any case. With the development of OBOR and Russia's own efforts it's inevitable that FSU and Persian Gulf gas will be delivered to East Asia by pipeline.

    It's also worth pointing out that according to the US Energy Information Agency that China presently has the world's largest reserves of technically recoverable shale gas. Exploitation is a problem owing to distance from water resources and a lack of technological expertise.

    These are surmountable problems as proven by America's fracking industry. Both the Eagle Ford and Bakken formations are in dry areas not very close to fresh water, and the fracking industry didn't even exist at the turn of the century. Dick Cheney promoted invading Iraq because his energy working group predicted that by this time America would be importing 90% of its oil consumption.

    Meanwhile larger and more competitive industries in chemicals, steel, fertilizer, plastics, cement, etc. add more final value and represent a greater overall level of product complexity and technical efficiency. As most of these products are themselves intermediate input goods they'll increase the competitiveness of our final goods industries as well.

    Another possible use of our gas supremacy is in our world class freight railroad system. Currently this system is diesel-based. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad (a Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary) is currently experimenting with gas-powered locomotives.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Corvinus
    "And how about the left’s jackbooted fascism that holds that America belongs to every racial group except whites..."

    Which is patently false. First, you are absolutely misapplying the concept "fascism" here, which means "a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and control of industry and commerce." The United States is not a fascist government, contrary to your tinfoil hattery. Second, America doesn't "belong" to any one racial or ethnic group. It consists of citizens, including whites, who have not been excluded in being part of the body politic or social fabric. You have a knack for wild generalizations. Third, whites have every liberty to form their own groups. It is just that not all white people are on board with the groups that YOU want to form or be part of. Which is their freedom of association to oppose.

    "and especially whites who don’t hate themselves?"

    In your world, whites hate themselves only if they do not conform to your belief system. Which, if you truly think about it, is ridiculous. White Americans are not monolithic. They belong to a number of groups, and love their membership in those groups. They need not be virtue signaled to death by your insistence that they only love themselves if they look out for all whites.

    "How come you never speak out against that bigotry? Hint: because to you and other lefties that’s a righteous and noble hate and bigotry."

    Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture. Again, do whites have the freedom of association to choose to include non-whites in their groups, and to marry and procreate with those groups? Why or why not?

    "If you put your thinking cap on you’d see that most of the diversity worshipping white and (((white))) leftists you look to for guidance live in whitetopias and rarely choose to associate with non-whites."

    It is a matter of economics here, not race. Upper-class people want to live in nice places, regardless of race or ethnicity. That is their liberty. It is reasonable and sensible for well-off folks to live in well-off places next to people who are also well-off. Again, it's about finances. Moreover, white people who live in such areas interact with non-whites on a day to day basis, whether it be at work or at play. You either don't see it, or if you do see it, you don't want to see it.

    "Somehow I doubt most of these people will freely choose to live in the equivalent of Detroit or San Paulo, Brazil, but if that’s what you all wish then more power to you and them if you’re really true believers in the cult of “muh diversity”."

    There is no cult here of diversity, just people from different races and ethnicities who choose to interact with one another. That is called being human.

    Now, regarding Detroit, there are a host of reasons for the downfall of that city other than racial matters. Would you like to know more, citizen, and become educated on the matter?

    According to what your crystal ball? I’ll do what is necessary to protect me, my friends and family and my people."

    Your people are white Americans, which includes me.

    "I’d venture that if and when that day ever comes the prospect of tens of thousands of heavily armed and pissed off white men will give you and other lefties the worst case of diarrhea in history."

    That is all fantasy, my friend. If there is this invasion that already has taken place in the States, and whites are about to become extinct, you choosing not to lift a finger now to do something about it tells me everything I need to know.

    ” … whites have every liberty to form their own groups. ”

    Not really. If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group. Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer’s cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.

    “Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture.”

    I will assume you’re being sincere: Apparently, you don’t follow trends. The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint
     
    if you're a Brit or Swede who thinks England or Sweden have a right to maintain their ethnic and/or cultural character, then from every orifice of the hive comes the screeching of 'Nazis! and 'white supremacists!!!!'

    "RACISTS!!!'

    if you're a white American who thinks Affirmative Action is wrong and racist and unfair, well then brace yourself for the orgy of hatred and screeching, 'white supremacists!!!'

    and it goes beyond race now even to include 'hateful constructs of the patriarchy'; like gender.

    that it's all prima facie insane, doesn't get in the way of they're screeching and hysterics.

    And even here on the Unz Review, there are people who would say that any desire of white Americans to maintain any shred of their (white = racist) culture or heritage, are nothing more than vile "white supremacists", who must be hounded and harangued for the crime of not hating their own kind (with the kind of visceral, rancorous race-hatred that they hate white people with ; )

    We live in a surreal idiocracy, where the most preposterous idiocies are given credence as if they were anything but the gibbering's of a drooling lunatic.

    All you have to do is realize they want what you have. White people have created amazing civilizations in Europe and N. America and elsewhere, and it's only natural that everyone else would want such things for themselves. Duh.

    But where it gets beyond ludicrous/obnoxious is when they demand white people have no right to even exist. Which is their mantra today, because they aren't laughed out of the room, as they obviously should be.
    , @Corvinus
    "If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group."

    Yet, despite SJW machinations, those whites have the freedom to form their own in-group. It doesn't mean they are free from outside pressure. Besides, any group is "stigmatized" by their ideological opponents, so that argument goes out the door.

    "Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer’s cavalcade of gay Nazi camp."

    Spencer's group is indeed serious. See, you just stigmatized his merry band, yet they still remain steadfast in their desire to gain footing in their community.

    “Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture.”

    "I will assume you’re being sincere: Apparently, you don’t follow trends."

    The trend is that the Coalition of the Fringes, Right and Left, write a narrative that normies find over-the-top.

    "The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization."

    A societal mantra as dictated by radical white liberals, not whites in general. In similar fashion, the Alt Right demands that whites accept "race realism", lest they be labeled "race traitors" and summarily labeled as "enemies".

    Works both ways here.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @SolontoCroesus

    The New England Puritans frowned on violence as a way of resolving social conflicts.
     
    ha

    Ask Hester Prynne.

    Puritans had a keen sense of psychological violence.
    It's still violence.
    The mouthpieces of god who mandated that violence still operated on the proposition, "Damn it, I am in charge."

    Puritans are basically antisocials , they are against human beings ( and thus against God )

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Art Deco
    Aside from some lucky rich people – the best solution for average Armenians is emigration.

    Best solution to what? Emigrate to where?

    The Glendale-Burbank-LA Area, quite often.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    The Census Bureau has it that there are 63,000 Armenian-born people in the 4 counties around LA. Not bad for a circumscribed area, but not a horde either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Miro23

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.
     
    Thanks for your informed opinion. These things are not so clear looking from the outside, and Western reporting seems to be mostly useless.

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.

    I would certainly say so. The average Sunni and Shiah get along OK – we’re not super chummy; they have their mosques and we have ours and we usually don’t pray behind each other – this is unlike say the various Sunni schools that may have slight variations in prayer, but make it a point to pray behind each other. It’s really only the takfiris that want to kill Shiah (as well as plenty of Sunnis they consider deviant). I had friends in UCLA who were Shiah, still do even though I consider myself as Orthodox Sunni as they come and believe Shiah positions are heterodox (and they reciprocate).

    This whole thing was really kicked off with the invasion of Iraq and the forces it unleashed. In times of desperation, war, crisis etc. some of the worst elements of society come out and this is simply part of human nature.

    Take for instance the break up of Yugoslavia. Let’s put the Muslims aside for a bit. In that conflict, once civil order broke down; Orthodox Serbs and Catholic Croats committed war crimes against each other’s populations. Things were going fine for a good long while, but this brought divisions, that most people really hadn’t cared about, to a crescendo.

    Another good example before this whole mess is the Armenia-Azerbaijan war in the 90′s. Azerbaijan is almost 90% Shiah, but plenty of Sunni volunteers went to fight on their side.

    There is little doubt in my head that much of this would simply not have occurred without the external interference. That doesn’t mean that, naively, everything was fine and dandy – rather external forces were the catalyst for the mess we see today.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    Here is Jackie Kennedy after her husband's death. First video is Nov. 28, 1963, less than a week after Kennedy's assassination. Second is 1964, I'm not sure but I think it is January.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP6XlHFEKNc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvqH23z9_84

    Notice that despite maintaining a dignified composure and showing grief she is sometimes smiling and is not violently agitated. Does this mean Kennedy didn't die?

    I blame those twenty German air stewardesses he ruptured himself shagging (on meth as usual) at a pool party just before Dallas. He heard the first shot but the full-torso brace he was wearing made him unable to duck.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • At one time, the US Military’s purpose and mission was thought to involve the defense of the territorial integrity of the United States of America as defined by its borders and the Constitution.

    Over time, the mission was perceived to be that of policing the world for the cause of democracy and the very democratic profits of transnational corporations and international finance.

    Now, it is self-evident that the primary mission of the US military, the greatest and most invincible in all of history, has always been to defend the right to commit sodomy and those of men who want to be women and women who want to be men. Nothing else matters.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @gwynedd1
    I recall another crisply formulated aphorism that came from a German I had briefly come to know when I was rather young. I remember a few things like his preference Silvaner over Riesling. The most memorable thing was a German explaining to me a method that prevents tyranny which is drafted armies.

    The Vietnam war can be know for three things at least. One is it was the last draft we had during war; it was remarkable in the freedom of the press; and it was hence a very unpopular war that was actually being won on the battle field. Well, they were not going to make those mistakes again.

    Interestingly, the German mandatory military service, which used to be treated like a sacred cow by much of the public and by all parties represented in parliament, was very suddenly and unceremoniously terminated by Merkel and defence minister Guttenberg in 2011. Both have shown pretty clear signs of being US deep state assets. To her credit, however, Merkel has allowed the German forces to sink into abject decrepitude, to that they really are of no use whatsoever to the U.S. military adventurists.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • With slight disappointment the public regarded the field. Just a minute ago, two knights were converging in fearsome joust, their spears pointing forth, plumage blowing, horses galloping, ladies out waving their handkerchiefs to their champions, - and now we see they have passed each other, both firmly in the saddle, plumage unruffled, spears unbloodied, horses...
  • @Kotlin
    @FB

    I agree. I also wanted to thank you for your great work on this website. I admire your scientific knowledge and your sense of humor. We learn a lot from you. BTW, How come you don't write a full article?

    Thanks for your kind words…glad to hear you enjoy my technical comments…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Rurik

    If our good host Run Unz is satisfied, you should be as well.
     
    I've finally had an opportunity to catch up a bit with my favorite website.

    Have not yet read all the comments, but figured I'd chime in here just to say that the issue between JR and I was resolved long ago, (at least on my end), but I'm sure Mr. Unz wanted to make the point that threatening to dox the participants to his phenomenal webzine is unacceptable.

    I think we're all indebted to Ron Unz for providing this oasis of free though and expression, (in an otherwise mundane and mendacious world), so I'm just repeating my gratitude to Mr. Unz, and for creating and maintaining and making his remarkable site available to us all. And I'm glad to see the distraction laid to rest.

    As to the article, there were some gems..

    ".. a very nice person, with exceptionally good body hygiene"

    "..don’t amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world."

    and a general kudos to the author for his tenacity.

    9/11 was an inside job. Conceived by Straussian, neocon psychopaths and perpetrated by the Mossad with elements within the CIA, FBI, (others) with a craven and complicit media and congress and 'intelligence' agencies- for the purpose of making the 21 century just as murderous and bloody as the 20th, and for the exact same motivation; Zionism. (Roth$child, et al unilateral hegemony over the planet)

    Any attempts to flesh out these Satanic forces, that threaten the all life on this Earth with their psychotic imperative to rule absolutely, is a noble endeavor as far as I can see.

    If it could be proven that Betty Ong's narrative (like Osama's, or Kuwait baby incubators and so many others) was a farce and a fraud, and that by demonstrating this, it might animate a more widespread demand for more investigative efforts, until we finally create a tsunami of outrage and righteous anger that will come crushing down upon the heads of those fiends and criminals who're responsible, then to this end, more power to you.

    Well, the US army planners of the first Gulf War are the ones ultimately responsible. According to Bruce Gudmundsson Saddam was not overthrown because the gas guzzling tanks rate of consumption meant they had to stop before nvading Iraq or run out of fuel, others say it was a policy decision at presidential level. I think the US army made sure they would not be sent into Iraq by not taking enough fuel. Or maybe it was April Glaspie to blame:she failed to warm Saddam of the the reaction to him invading Iraq, and he never would have tried it if he had been properly told what would happen. One Bonesman Bush pres to set up Saddam and another to topple him. Could have been a long term plan.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    April Glaspie to blame:she failed to warm Saddam of the the reaction to him invading Iraq
     
    Glaspie was used as a chump to rope-a-dope Saddam into bungling into Kuwait, so that the ZUS could act 'shocked, shocked', and then disabuse him of the chemical and other weapons the ZUS had given him to use specifically on Persians/Iran.

    she called the characterization that it was her idea to lie to Saddam a "deliberate deception on a major scale".

    Ross Perot:

    "...we told him (Saddam) he could take the northern part of Kuwait; and when he took the whole thing we went nuts. And if we didn't tell him that, why won't we even let the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee see the written instructions for Ambassador Glaspie?"


    Could have been a long term plan.
     
    since it's all part and parcel of Zionism, then of course it's all part of a long term scheme to create a global Orwellian dystopia. Duh.
    , @utu

    One Bonesman Bush pres to set up Saddam and another to topple him. Could have been a long term plan.
     
    I am pretty sure that if Bush Sr. went all the way the planners would be happy. For some reason he did not go and so he paid the price for it by not getting the second term. The planners or the TPTB were not too happy with Bush Sr., who riding on the highest approval ratings (90%) after the war decided to confront and challenge Yitzhak Shamir but then lost his nerve and instead of turning to American people backed off. Bush Sr. seemed to be very reluctant to go to war and it was only after his meeting with Margaret Thatcher in Aspen, Colorado that the decision to go to war was announced.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Fran Macadam
    One fiendish way to neutralize the good counsel of those against these wars, is to state all the many obvious and provable negative motives, properties and consequences of war - but then, sum up by blaming it on "The Joos."

    Adding up the events of recent history, it would appear that that sum is the correct one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @myself
    I peg it as collective American, and by extension collective Western, insanity.

    We're not going to cure ourselves - we should be in the civilization equivalent of a straight-jacket, barring that, maybe we should be put out of our misery.

    And BTW, the older generations to whom I've spoken mostly know what's what. They know in their gut that their societies and their children have no future, and most are banking on being dead when the predictable collapse occurs.

    Yup, the Boomers do not give a shit, and just want to live comfortably and then die. We are now at the end game.

    Give it 20 years, maximum. 20 years - a blink of an eye in historical terms.

    I suspect that the government’s fear of societal collapse – brought on by the impending collapse of the petrodollar, which the Empire is in vain trying to ward off by its perpetual wars in the Middle East and its feeble attempts at economic war on China – is behind the recent push for disarming the public. The prospect of a fully armed populace rioting in the streets is indeed a scary one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    I've read this viewpoint (I think in Bloomberg article).

    But a lot of industry can be made more competitive through productivity gains and investment in capital. Not from having cheaper energy costs.

    If you can compare it to farming for example. America did not become the world's largest food exporter, by 'lowering the costs of water and soil'.

    It came from the investment in capital/technology.

    Sure, and I’ve long maintained that human capital trumps natural capital.

    And generally machinery (if we could somehow separate it from the kn0w-how needed to operate) trumps natural capital.

    But there’s no reason to ignore the role of natural capital. The choice between processing natural gas into higher value-added products like chemicals, fertilizer, steel, fiberglas, etc. vs. simply exporting it makes it clear the former is more valuable.

    Keeping input costs low (without subsidies) is a form of low-hanging fruit. Capital and know-how on the other hand take more time to build up.

    And while the investment into know-how, farm machinery, improved genetics, etc. are obviously very important for why America is the world’s largest food exporter, it should also be noted that we have more arable land than any other country in the world. #2 and #3 in arable land area are India and China, who for obvious reasons can’t export as much food as us. #4 is Russia who with its smaller population perhaps will one day export as much as us (already has surpassed us in wheat exports).

    Even here my thinking is relevant. The #1 cash crop in America is corn (maize). A huge fraction of this is wastefully turned into sugar and fuel substitutes. In the absence of our bullshit ethanol and HFCS industries, we would export far more food.

    If you want a real investment story for agricultural success look to the world’s second agro-exporter…which amazingly is the tiny country of the Netherlands.

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/09/holland-agriculture-sustainable-farming/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    You will surely be right that having lowers cost of inputs - should improve competitiveness of industries that use them.

    But to go back to the gas discussion, why is keeping the domestic gas price lower (and thereby subsidizing some industries), preferable to exporting more of gas as LNG, and directly managing to 'cash in'.

    I guess the answer would require study comparing the two situations.

    But there seems no intrinsic reason why the former is better.

    And the latter would seem preferable to me, because the result of lower gas prices in America (combined with export restrictions of LNG or I'm not sure what you propose), will be lower gas production other things equal.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • A small volunteer force is perfectly adequate for defending the USA (its constitutional role) and worked fine until our overlords decided to create an American Empire. By doing so they have wasted our great geographical blessing of being “surrounded by oceans and weaklings” (per Bismarck).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Truth
    Yo revOO, you won.

    You had to apologize for what you said you were going to do to one of these NeoConscripts, instead you Doxed all of them AT THE SAME TIME.

    The official 9/11 story is not only patently absurd, but so incredibly ridiculous that I would have a hard time believing that anyone who believes it has an IQ over 70.

    They must be those LO-IQ White Nationalist Wiggers another poster is always talking about.

    (heh...heh...heh...)

    to one of these NeoConscripts

    blow me blubber lips

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hAzBTgKUh8
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    This is all very plausible.

    There's been occasional stories in the media about Jewish repats who went back to Russia (i.e. Moscow) because Israel was too provincial for the tastes they'd developed.

    Yes compared to Moscow, it is surely very culturally provincial, in every sense.

    But the chaotic, primitive Middle Eastern, atmosphere is a different issue entirely (some people instantly fall in love with chaotic Middle Eastern atmospheres, some people hate it).

    -

    By the way I read a good article this week on people emigrating from Israel

    https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3591450

    -

    As for Georgia. I haven’t been to the region. But the atmosphere surely something similar there. And plenty of tourists are falling in love with these more chaotic atmospheres. But I don’t think they will confuse it with the West.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • anonymous[264] • Disclaimer says:

    Any war failing to yield peace is purposeless and, if purposeless, both wrong and stupid.

    What about the most common example of war for the purpose of plunder and material gain? The morality of “wrong” doesn’t enter into it and ultimate peace may or may not be a goal.
    It’s not the fault of the military that Afghans haven’t all cooperated with their occupation. They’ve done the job assigned to them but impossible jobs are, after all, impossible. It’s a military-political pipe-dream that was created by the incompetents of the Bush years and the political part is unattainable.

    Madeleine Albright said it best: “If we have to use force, it is because we are America

    I like this “we” part. That evil witch certainly never risked herself but sent other people’s children into the cauldron. There’s no “we” in all this. The upper echelon sacrifices the small fry and their lives mean nothing to them.

    Having outsourced responsibility for defending the country

    They’re not defending the country, that’s mind-boggling propaganda. There’s so much delusion here that one could go through this article line-by-line and dissect it. I’m off this “support our troops” wagon. It’s just a fiction; you sign up, you know the risks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price

    They’re not defending the country, that’s mind-boggling propaganda.
     
    Indeed. The last Americans to die defending their country were the Confederate soldiers who died defending theirs. All others died for the US empire, including Union forces who died while making the South it's first victim.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    I've read this viewpoint (I think in Bloomberg article).

    But a lot of industry can be made more competitive through productivity gains and investment in capital. Not from having cheaper energy costs.

    If you can compare it to farming for example. America did not become the world's largest food exporter, by 'lowering the costs of water and soil'.

    It came from the investment in capital/technology.

    It came from the investment in capital/technology.

    That and very favorable geography which includes cheap water and soil.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    And all those waterways connecting to the world ocean. Almost free transport.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • Tom Dispatch left gatekeeping is like confirmation. A bunch of horny adolescents straggle into church holding prayer books in front of their out-of-control erumpent boners and say ridiculous nonsense in public. But Tom Dispatch goes beyond ordinary ridiculous nonsense like the holy spirit’s gonna get me, or I’m gonna commit cannibalism on christ:

    “By common consent, the United States today has the world’s best military”

    Where to begin? Back before the first Iraq war, this former death merchant modeled the industrial base for modern munitions. Long story short, it was pitifully inadequate. Any real mobilization would grind to a halt to retool extensive civilian assets, diverting resources at the cost, if you’re lucky, of a severe recession (if you’re outa luck inflation spikes too.) Static analysis with Leontief models show this. The dynamics are worse.

    When the US regime went to war anyway, the inevitable happened. We all watched rusty national guard artillery get towed, not to the scrapyard where it belonged, but to the nearest airbase to blow up and get dumped in Iraq. No one was surprised when Saddam annihilated the 3/7 Cav and fought the 3rd Infantry to a standstill in Baghdad (That’s partly because no one was allowed to know about it. Massive OPSEC saved the day by hiding the rout from the US public until the US could drop a NWC-illegal neutron bomb.) Then the recession hit and our DCI head of state got canned. Then came a decade-long genocidal blockade, then the troops took a mulligan and the USA lost again – this time to Iran, who wasn’t even fighting.

    The defense industrial base is now hollower and crookeder than ever. Institutionalized graft keeps it going as productivity decays. Russia just put it out of its misery.

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2018/04/23/proven-americas-f35-junk-against-russia-syria/

    Common consent. I got your common consent here in my pants.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mike P

    No one was surprised when Saddam annihilated the 3/7 Cav and fought the 3rd Infantry to a standstill in Baghdad ... until the US could drop a NWC-illegal neutron bomb
     
    That's the first time I hear about this. Are there some good sources to confirm/learn more about it?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I am an unashamed advocate of the draft to ameliorate the primary dynamic in question.

    Read More
    • Agree: Carroll Price
    • Replies: @Anon
    I must be stupid, because I don’t understand what you mean.
    , @Carroll Price
    Indeed, it would cure the primary dynamic in question practically over-night.
    , @SteveM

    I am an unashamed advocate of the draft to ameliorate the primary dynamic in question.
     
    The best way to "ameliorate the primary dynamic in question" is to mandate that the arrogant DC nitwits read the foreign policy sections of George Washington's Farewell Address first thing every day. Have C-SPAN televise the reading every day that Congress is in session.

    Then maybe those militarist clowns will eventually put 2 and 2 together without the need to draft American citizens into militarized slavery.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @daniel le mouche
    So impressed with your political acumen, why you even know the term 'nation-state' (should be a hyphen there for future reference).
    Has it occurred to you that nations, even blocks of nations, can be and are run by very tiny, diabolical cabals, closely interlinked families?
    I realize you have read things I too once read and which just seem hackneyed expressions now, your nation states are exactly like people and want only their survival. Yes, that's true--if and only if you know, FOR SURE, what these so-called nation-states are. If they are plutocrats, and they simply must be, then it is true that they care only for their own survival, very much at the expense of literally everyone else on the planet. Adam Smith's 'vile maxim': All for us, and nothing for anyone else. But I'm taking from Chomsky, and feel therefore I am on shaky ground...

    I don’t know anything “FOR SURE” and neither do you. No one in this world does because no one may have absolute verification of data, no matter how loudly and persistently they call for it. It is not empirically verifiable that a Brotherhood of the Bell type organisation (Skull and Bones according to Anthony P. Sutton ) does not deliberately create enemies such as Hitler and Stalin all the better to forment war and control America. Nor is it “for sure” that anyone died in 9/11, which may have been staged by the cia chief two presidents and a senator Bonesmen Bush clan, maybe the victims were not 100% veritably real people because 9/11 never actually happened.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gulf_War_Did_Not_Take_Place

    The essays in Libération and The Guardian were published before, during and after the Gulf War and they were titled accordingly: during the American military and rhetorical buildup as “The Gulf War Will not take Place”; during military action as “The Gulf War is not Taking Place”, and after action was over, “The Gulf War Did Not Take Place”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality#Simulacrum
    In his work Simulacra and Simulation, Baudrillard argues the “imaginary world” of Disneyland magnetizes people inside and has been presented as “imaginary” to make people believe that all its surroundings are “real”. But he believes that the Los Angeles area is not real; thus it is hyperreal. Disneyland is a set of apparatuses which tries to bring imagination and fiction to what is called “real”. This concerns the American values and way of life in a sense and “concealing the fact that the real is no longer real, and thus of saving the reality principle.”[19]

    “The Disneyland imaginary is neither true or false: it is a deterrence machine set up in order to rejuvenate in reverse the fiction of the real. Whence the debility, the infantile degeneration of this imaginary. It’s meant to be an infantile world, in order to make us believe that the adults are elsewhere, in the “real” world, and to conceal the fact that real childishness is everywhere, particularly among those adults who go there to act the child in order to foster illusions of their real childishness.”

    Its possible at the centre of the huddle of south pole Emperor penguins is always the same bunch of free riders, and a secret organisation running the USA stays in power whatever happens.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu

    I don’t know anything “FOR SURE” and neither do you. No one in this world does because no one may have absolute verification of data, no matter how loudly and persistently they call for it.
     
    This is true. Nevertheless some narratives are considered more true, more known, more factual than others. Truth in this context is merely a rhetorical device. Who poses the truth wins. But in fact it is the other way around: who wins poses the truth.
    , @daniel le mouche
    'Its possible at the centre of the huddle of south pole Emperor penguins is always the same bunch of free riders, and a secret organisation running the USA stays in power whatever happens.'

    We seem to be in agreement. And though I certainly don't claim to be absolutely sure, the latter part of the above statement can only conceivably be absolutely true--all evidence in daily life confirms it, if one pays attention, as certainly do the farcicle elections every year or so, as does common sense when you ask yourself, Do I have ANY political power, any whatsoever? What about my state? Or town for that matter? How can we all possibly be ever in lock step with master's agenda, shit and puked out 24/7 right into our brains?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • I recall another crisply formulated aphorism that came from a German I had briefly come to know when I was rather young. I remember a few things like his preference Silvaner over Riesling. The most memorable thing was a German explaining to me a method that prevents tyranny which is drafted armies.

    The Vietnam war can be know for three things at least. One is it was the last draft we had during war; it was remarkable in the freedom of the press; and it was hence a very unpopular war that was actually being won on the battle field. Well, they were not going to make those mistakes again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mike P
    Interestingly, the German mandatory military service, which used to be treated like a sacred cow by much of the public and by all parties represented in parliament, was very suddenly and unceremoniously terminated by Merkel and defence minister Guttenberg in 2011. Both have shown pretty clear signs of being US deep state assets. To her credit, however, Merkel has allowed the German forces to sink into abject decrepitude, to that they really are of no use whatsoever to the U.S. military adventurists.
    , @EliteCommInc.
    Laugh ---- and

    laughing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @ploni almoni
    If you stop reading something then you are a case of arrested development. Which is what the Deep State wants.

    Huh??? I highly doubt the deep state wants me to stop reading their propaganda.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Oops, forgot the video, Watch this video at 4:20, 5:40, 6:40
    Those are explosions, below the falling top, even the reporters agree!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    How anyone in his right mind can characterize this as a "collapse" is beyond me. It simply beggars the imagination that people could be THAT stupid.

    "Thus compromised, the trusses give way." Since when does "giving way" involve explosions and the disintegration of steel and concrete?

    Total, unadulterated bullshit of the most egregious kind.
    , @NoseytheDuke
    Regrettably, I have fallen into the habit of referring to the explosions as collapses even though I've known almost from the beginning that explosives caused the buildings to be destroyed. I shall take greater care to no longer do so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Catiline
    Partisan divisions over the military reflect much deeper cultural factors. “From the quasi-war with France [1798-1800] to the Vietnam war,” writes historian David Hackett Fischer, “the two southern cultures strongly supported every American war no matter what it was about or who it was against. Southern ideas of honour and the warrior ethic combined to create regional war fevers of great intensity in 1798, 1812, 1846, 1861, 1898, 1941, 1950 and 1965.” At the same time, the greater New England region has been home to the most intense opposition to American foreign wars-including the second world war. For 50 years, liberal American historians have spoken of “right-wing isolationists” but the fact is that most isolationists in the 1930s were liberals or leftists. Ironically, Roosevelt found the strongest supporters for his anti-Hitler foreign policy among racist Southern conservatives, who hated New Deal liberalism but were eager to save Britain and defeat Germany. The isolationist America First committee was a miserable failure in the south.

    As the southern states have gone Republican in recent years, so has America’s military, in which southern whites have always been over-represented. In November 2000, during the electoral college crisis, Democratic party operatives in the contested state of Florida tried to disqualify, on technical grounds, as many overseas ballots from US military personnel as they could, on the correct assumption that American soldiers are overwhelmingly Republican.

    What explains the deeply-ingrained military ethic of southerners-and the equally intense anti-military sentiments of greater New Englanders? Again, culture is the answer. The New England Puritans frowned on violence as a way of resolving social conflicts. The southern cavalier code, however, endorsed violence when personal or national honour was being “disrespected” or “dissed.” According to the sociologists Richard E Nisbet and Dov Cohen, although white southerners are no more likely than northern whites to kill strangers for money, they are much more likely to kill spouses, lovers, friends, and acquaintances who have insulted them. These differences explain why southern states have higher rates of homicide-and more executions. Most black Americans share southern culture (and the Latin American culture of honour is very similar). When murders committed by blacks and Latinos are not counted, the anthropologist Marvin Harris has observed, “America’s rates of violent crime are much closer to the rates found in Japan.” If southern whites were then subtracted from the murder figures, the US murder rate would be lower still.

    All of this means that the talk in recent years about a supposed “resurgence of right-wing isolationism” is misleading. Many commentators have found themselves confused by the ambitious liberal interventionism of Clinton and Gore and the right-wing isolationism of Patrick Buchanan. But neither Clinton nor Buchanan are typical of their parties. Buchanan has little influence on the Republican right, which has repudiated his isolationism as well as his protectionism. Clinton, like Gore, emerged from the shrinking southern conservative wing of the Democratic party. His southern-style interventionism was supported by many Jewish liberals who want a US forward military presence capable of protecting Israel and who viewed Serbia’s ethnic cleansing in the Balkans as a replay of the Holocaust. But the interventionist sentiments of Jewish liberals are not shared by other groups in the Democratic electoral base, like Yankees, Germanic Americans and blacks.

    This is why Europeans and Asians who believe that the Democrats will be more “internationalist” than the Republicans are mistaken. True, liberal Yankees are more in favour of constructive engagement with international institutions and norms than their southern rivals: compare the support of Clinton and Gore for the Kyoto treaty with George W Bush’s hostility to UN peacekeeping missions. But when the US uses military power-unilaterally or as part of an alliance like Nato-the fiercest opposition always comes from left-wing Democrats. Republicans may not like open-ended peace-keeping operations in the Balkans, but where US and allied security interests are clearly at stake, as in the Persian Gulf or the Taiwan Strait, they are hawks. By contrast, much of the Democratic left denounced Clinton as a war criminal during the Kosovo war. If a Republican president had led the Nato effort in the Balkans, most Democrats in Congress would probably have opposed it, just as most congressional Democrats voted against the Gulf war. Tony Blair may not like their thinking on domestic politics, but if he wants a strong Anglo-American alliance then his natural allies will be found among Anglophile Virginia Republicans, not among pacifist Democrats in Massachusetts or Oregon.

    https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/americastribes

    The New England Puritans frowned on violence as a way of resolving social conflicts.

    ha

    Ask Hester Prynne.

    Puritans had a keen sense of psychological violence.
    It’s still violence.
    The mouthpieces of god who mandated that violence still operated on the proposition, “Damn it, I am in charge.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @fariseos
    Puritans are basically antisocials , they are against human beings ( and thus against God )
    , @jacques sheete
    Interesting that quote is what stood out to me as well. The Puritans could be some sadistic SOBs by what I understand of their history. Their treatment of their fellow "Christians" including Quakers was a bit creative and not exactly gentle.

    Here's someone commenting on their furious nuttiness.:

    The Puritans are almost always portrayed as a peaceful and persecuted bunch, but they were a very revolutionary, seditious, and violent people.:

    England was plunged into an environment of Puritan blood rage and unreasonable fundamentalism. In the words of Hume, “fanaticism had its own language, it was a new jargon invented by the fury and hypocrisy of the times.” The Puritans wanted “No king, no nobility,” and like every leftists or progressive, the Puritans wanted “universal equality.” To use the words of Hume, “it was, in short, necessary to fanaticize the people with notions of perfect equality, to assure the obedience of the masses, and gradually to form a coalition against the monarchy.”
    http://shoebat.com/2014/11/03/puritans-just-violent-muslims/
     
    Another source wrote this. (Sorry no link)

    The Puritans wanted to be free to establish a “Christian” theocracy. (A perverted one complete with Indian extermination, communist principles, a police state...)

     

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Rurik

    holocaust’ scam
     
    everyone who denies the Holy Holocaust - when the most evil people that ever lived tried to murder God Himself (the Jewish people) are as bad as the Nazis in Hungary who demand to remain Nazis, who refuse to do what they must - blend their Nazi genes away in a sea of homogenizing humanity.

    We are all humans, but some humans, (Nazis like the Hungarians) want to preserve their unique Nazi ethnic identity. This is where George Soros comes in, and flings open the gates to the Nazi kingdom, to a purifying wave of African migrants and gypsies and Muslims and everyone else they can get, who in time, will blend away the vile identity of Hungary's (and Germany's and Norway's and France's) Nazis, and save God's people from the next time Hitler wants to make soap and lampshades.

    ” … to a purifying wave of African migrants … ”

    should be

    ” … to a putrefying wave of African migrants … ”

    that’s more accurate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Thorfinnsson
    There are other major gas producers besides the one I listed, yes, and not just Iran.

    The USA unlike Iran has no barriers to global trade (other than idiotic self-imposed ones thanks to our sanctions love affair), and we are a much more developed country with a much better business climate.

    The shale boom has led to a renaissance in the US chemicals industry, which previously had been migrating offshore for decades in pursuit of lower input costs.

    I'm not able to find it now, but a few years ago the CEO of Dow Chemicals wrote an essay decrying the rush to export surplus gas. He produced a list of $100 billion worth of capital investment being made in America owing to low gas prices. Other corporate executives denounced him for "protectionism" since our business class has largely gotten high on its own supply.

    My general position is that with the exception of labor costs it should be government policy to keep input costs as low as possible (without resorting to subsidies of course) in order to gain a competitive edge against rival foreign countries. We're not any better at engineering or management than Western Europe or Japan, but we do have bountiful natural resources unlike them.

    It's okay to export surplus raw materials within reason, but you never want to do so when the opportunity cost results in foreign industries adding value instead of your own industries. Mercantilism 101.

    It's not enough to have lower gas prices than gas importing countries. Gas prices must be competitive with other major gas producing countries where modern industrial plants can be constructed.

    I’ve read this viewpoint (I think in Bloomberg article).

    But a lot of industry can be made more competitive through productivity gains and investment in capital. Not from having cheaper energy costs.

    If you can compare it to farming for example. America did not become the world’s largest food exporter, by ‘lowering the costs of water and soil’.

    It came from the investment in capital/technology.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mitleser

    It came from the investment in capital/technology.
     
    That and very favorable geography which includes cheap water and soil.

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/usa_great.jpg
    , @Thorfinnsson
    Sure, and I've long maintained that human capital trumps natural capital.

    And generally machinery (if we could somehow separate it from the kn0w-how needed to operate) trumps natural capital.

    But there's no reason to ignore the role of natural capital. The choice between processing natural gas into higher value-added products like chemicals, fertilizer, steel, fiberglas, etc. vs. simply exporting it makes it clear the former is more valuable.

    Keeping input costs low (without subsidies) is a form of low-hanging fruit. Capital and know-how on the other hand take more time to build up.

    And while the investment into know-how, farm machinery, improved genetics, etc. are obviously very important for why America is the world's largest food exporter, it should also be noted that we have more arable land than any other country in the world. #2 and #3 in arable land area are India and China, who for obvious reasons can't export as much food as us. #4 is Russia who with its smaller population perhaps will one day export as much as us (already has surpassed us in wheat exports).

    Even here my thinking is relevant. The #1 cash crop in America is corn (maize). A huge fraction of this is wastefully turned into sugar and fuel substitutes. In the absence of our bullshit ethanol and HFCS industries, we would export far more food.

    If you want a real investment story for agricultural success look to the world's second agro-exporter...which amazingly is the tiny country of the Netherlands.

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/09/holland-agriculture-sustainable-farming/

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In other news, it seems I was broadly correct (despite my lack of knowledge of Armenian political specifics as Avery pointed out).

    Sargsyan has resigned, but there has been no wave of anti-Russian sentiment to go with it.

    Instead of hanging on to unpopular foreign leaders, Russia has maintained neutrality over what is an internal Armenian political squabble: https://www.facebook.com/maria.zakharova.167/posts/10216573046828327

    (Before anyone rushes in to make the Ukraine comparison, that wasn’t really a choice in 2013-14, because the Maidan was explicitly anti-Russian from the start. Unlike the Ukraine, Armenia really does need Russia).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • I was one of the first to sign up for the “All Volunteer Army”. It was only a two year commitment but the recruiters tried very hard to get me to enlist for three years.Two years is plenty of time to get to know what the army is like.
    The people in my Company (roughly two hundred) were mostly from the mid to lower socioeconomic orders. About half did not have high school degrees. Some were there because a judge gave them a deal too good to pass up. Some were there because a politician interceded on their behalf due to serious criminal records. Most were there for action and adventure to counteract boredom.
    The officers tried to scare us about the Russian menace even back then. So they sent us overseas to guard the German border in case the Russkies attacked.
    The food was good and I venture to say that most of these young people never had it so good in terms of food, clothing and comfort. But the understanding was that we would risk our lives for the cause of world peace, love and understanding.
    I always wondered why they never sent us to guard our own borders but always other borders. Our propaganda ministers were some of the best. These days the “Propaganda Matrix” we live in is all encompassing.
    Long live the “military Industrial Complex”. Hail Caesar.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry

    For the Moscow yuppies I think it’s more about Georgia’s (admittedly not entirely fictive) success at larping as a “European” country. This allows them to status signal how European and progressive they are.
     
    It's a good hypothesis - but I'm not sure that can be true for people who actually like their holiday in Georgia though.

    People I know was there, say that they like it because how cheap, primitive and 'crazy' the atmosphere is - the kind of same reason people talk about countries like India or Mexico.

    The kind of tourists who like clean, European destinations - it's a slightly different taste, although sure there's plenty who like both (both primitive and sophisticated destinations, but it's difficult to confuse them).

    I like both kind of destinations but I would not confuse them.

    I like the developed and posh places like Cambridge and Oxford and Salzburg. But also like undeveloped looking places like Israel. But although Israel is economically rich and allied with Western powers, you could never confuse it on the ground with a Western country. Israel is very primitive, Middle Eastern, chaotic, undeveloped atmosphere country. On the ground, surely much more similar to Tehran (not that I have been there), than to New York .

    The way a country allies is not so much reflected in the experience a tourist has. For example, in Moscow, you get a much more 'Western European' style experience than you would get in (say) Mexico City.

    And the kind of energy you get in Georgia will surely be quite an opposite, of what you get in the actual West.

    This is all very plausible.

    There’s been occasional stories in the media about Jewish repats who went back to Russia (i.e. Moscow) because Israel was too provincial for the tastes they’d developed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    Yes compared to Moscow, it is surely very culturally provincial, in every sense.

    But the chaotic, primitive Middle Eastern, atmosphere is a different issue entirely (some people instantly fall in love with chaotic Middle Eastern atmospheres, some people hate it).

    -

    By the way I read a good article this week on people emigrating from Israel

    https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3591450


    -


    As for Georgia. I haven't been to the region. But the atmosphere surely something similar there. And plenty of tourists are falling in love with these more chaotic atmospheres. But I don't think they will confuse it with the West.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Zumbuddi
    Pat Lang should've glanced at the comments to Bacevich's writings before he posted on Unz,

    The Unz commentariat refuses to be censored or to self-censor (thank you Ron Unz, 1000 X).

    UFers call BS when they smell it.

    Lang scurried back to his gated spiderhole & winged about "delusional" commenters at Unz.

    Don't let the door hit ya.

    The way I see it, they’re [both colonels] shaped by environment and recall Franz Fannon:

    “Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn’t fit in with the core belief”

    This can be expected of non-professionals and even professionals that are ‘bought in.’ But when said parties are claiming to be dissident, stepping 1/2 way out of the perception bubble doesn’t cut it, either yourself open to what’s actually going on, get at least a little bit humble and stay with the learning curve, or your stuff can get stepped on.

    I did see Lang’s whining at ‘SST’ and he lost a lot of respect from your’s truly

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Hunsdon
    If our good host Run Unz is satisfied, you should be as well.

    If our good host Run Unz is satisfied, you should be as well.

    I’ve finally had an opportunity to catch up a bit with my favorite website.

    Have not yet read all the comments, but figured I’d chime in here just to say that the issue between JR and I was resolved long ago, (at least on my end), but I’m sure Mr. Unz wanted to make the point that threatening to dox the participants to his phenomenal webzine is unacceptable.

    I think we’re all indebted to Ron Unz for providing this oasis of free though and expression, (in an otherwise mundane and mendacious world), so I’m just repeating my gratitude to Mr. Unz, and for creating and maintaining and making his remarkable site available to us all. And I’m glad to see the distraction laid to rest.

    As to the article, there were some gems..

    “.. a very nice person, with exceptionally good body hygiene”

    “..don’t amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world.”

    and a general kudos to the author for his tenacity.

    9/11 was an inside job. Conceived by Straussian, neocon psychopaths and perpetrated by the Mossad with elements within the CIA, FBI, (others) with a craven and complicit media and congress and ‘intelligence’ agencies- for the purpose of making the 21 century just as murderous and bloody as the 20th, and for the exact same motivation; Zionism. (Roth$child, et al unilateral hegemony over the planet)

    Any attempts to flesh out these Satanic forces, that threaten the all life on this Earth with their psychotic imperative to rule absolutely, is a noble endeavor as far as I can see.

    If it could be proven that Betty Ong’s narrative (like Osama’s, or Kuwait baby incubators and so many others) was a farce and a fraud, and that by demonstrating this, it might animate a more widespread demand for more investigative efforts, until we finally create a tsunami of outrage and righteous anger that will come crushing down upon the heads of those fiends and criminals who’re responsible, then to this end, more power to you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    Well, the US army planners of the first Gulf War are the ones ultimately responsible. According to Bruce Gudmundsson Saddam was not overthrown because the gas guzzling tanks rate of consumption meant they had to stop before nvading Iraq or run out of fuel, others say it was a policy decision at presidential level. I think the US army made sure they would not be sent into Iraq by not taking enough fuel. Or maybe it was April Glaspie to blame:she failed to warm Saddam of the the reaction to him invading Iraq, and he never would have tried it if he had been properly told what would happen. One Bonesman Bush pres to set up Saddam and another to topple him. Could have been a long term plan.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Anatoly Karlin

    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?
     
    Correct, though only true for the sovok generation.

    Georgian restaurants in the USSR played the role of French restaurants in the US, as the elite place to go to place for status signalling purposes. Only French cuisine really is world class, whereas Georgian cuisine isn't (same for the wines). Now that there are mid-range Georgian establishments, the older Soviet people like to frequent them, since they continue to regard them as prestigious, even though there are no end of much cheaper (and better) restaurants and eateries.

    For the Moscow yuppies I think it's more about Georgia's (admittedly not entirely fictive) success at larping as a "European" country. This allows them to status signal how European and progressive they are.

    For the Moscow yuppies I think it’s more about Georgia’s (admittedly not entirely fictive) success at larping as a “European” country. This allows them to status signal how European and progressive they are.

    It’s a good hypothesis – but I’m not sure that can be true for people who actually like their holiday in Georgia though.

    People I know was there, say that they like it because how cheap, primitive and ‘crazy’ the atmosphere is – the kind of same reason people talk about countries like India or Mexico.

    The kind of tourists who like clean, European destinations – it’s a slightly different taste, although sure there’s plenty who like both (both primitive and sophisticated destinations, but it’s difficult to confuse them).

    I like both kind of destinations but I would not confuse them.

    I like the developed and posh places like Cambridge and Oxford and Salzburg. But also like undeveloped looking places like Israel. But although Israel is economically rich and allied with Western powers, you could never confuse it on the ground with a Western country. Israel is very primitive, Middle Eastern, chaotic, undeveloped atmosphere country. On the ground, surely much more similar to Tehran (not that I have been there), than to New York .

    The way a country allies is not so much reflected in the experience a tourist has. For example, in Moscow, you get a much more ‘Western European’ style experience than you would get in (say) Mexico City.

    And the kind of energy you get in Georgia will surely be quite an opposite, of what you get in the actual West.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    This is all very plausible.

    There's been occasional stories in the media about Jewish repats who went back to Russia (i.e. Moscow) because Israel was too provincial for the tastes they'd developed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Steve Gittelson

    More likely Lebanon, KS or Fargo, ND. He has to have this outlet since he has probably gotten his ass whipped from trying his snark out in public on people who could reach him.
     
    ROFLMAO. I love you guys -- you conspiracy whack-jobs. Fucking nuts from the git-go. Seventeen years go by, the world has moved on long, long ago, yet you focused, dedicated, self-sacrificing seekers after Truth exchange crib notes about phone calls (for the luv of god, tabulating phone calls from 17 years ago, jeezuss!!).

    It is interesting that conspiracy theory loonies each have their own selected homefield -- your preferred conspiracy that consumes your, um, "hobby" time. Some of you fruitcakes are probably still hard at work on theories of who really killed Lizzie Borden's Ma and Pa.

    Go back to your playground. I will leave you all alone now. But, gracious me! what frenetic stupidity! Obsession knows no limits -- long proven, and proven again every day.

    you conspiracy whack-jobs. Fucking nuts from the git-go. conspiracy theory loonies frenetic stupidity

    Once again, when you cannot win the debate with facts resort to name calling. Weak!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Jonathan, if you really want to pursue this I have a few thoughts.

    They don’t come from the internet they come from an original source, me.

    Like non existent Betty Ong and her crisis actor siblings I’m born, raised and lived most of my life in San Francisco.

    So I don’t need google maps or any other internet source.

    Like most people on this site, I picked up somewhere that Betty Ong went to George Washington High on 32nd Avenue a couple blocks from Geary in the outer Richmond district of San Francisco. I lived less than a mile north of that school.

    I assumed that because she went to Washington she and her family lived in the outer Richmond.

    I just read the Wikipedia entry. It says she grew up in Chinatown. Now, Chinatown is about 5 miles from Washington High. And whether by car or bus it’s a ghastly trip. By car it takes a good hour during week day traffic.

    To get there by bus it would involve 2 buses and a cable car. It would take an hour or more twice a day. After the cable car she would have to wait at the Geary st bus stop.

    It’s horrible, especially when it rains. Picture 50 people trying to crowd unto the Geary st bus. Then the horrible crowded awful bus that goes about 5 miles an hour till it gets west of Van Ness.

    Now, why would she or her parents want her to waste 2 to 3 hours a day to go to a perfectly ordinary average public high school when there is an ordinary public school, Galileo right in Chinatown?

    If her parents sent her to Mercy SF or St Rose or Lick-Wilmerding or another private school in western SF the horrible commute would be worth it.

    But to go to Washington? Unless it was a forced bussing thing.
    Someone found a Gloria Ong graduated 1972 from Galileo the Chinatown high school. That’s the right name and age of the sister.

    Revulsky found an inter net Washington yearbook and the only Betty Ong was black.

    There are about 75 private and public high schools in SF. St Rose closed after the 1989 earthquake. Many of the private schools opened after Betty Ong was high school age. Does anyone want to search all those schools? Not me

    Go ahead Sparkon, use your wonderful google skills and tell me how I am wrong about how to to get from Chinatown to the outer Richmond.

    Your pontificating about cities you’ve never been to is ridiculous. You should be embarrassed

    Go ahead Sparkon, use your wonderful google skills and tell me how I am wrong about how to to get from Chinatown to the outer Richmond.

    Your pontificating about cities you’ve never been to is ridiculous. You should be embarrassed

    But anon[257] wasn’t done yet with his BS, although no new gold frame so far, and nobody knows what Chinatown has to do with 9/11.

    Now he lies again that I deny the towers fell. What a lying sack of you-know-what!

    Anon[257] • says
    April 23, 2018 at 4:44 am GMT • 100 Words

    Because Sparkon denies the towers fell despite various people present in Manhattan or across the river in Brooklyn seeing the planes crash into the buildings.

    That’s rather devious and small of you anon[257], taunting me from within a comment addressed to Jonathan Revusky, and then following up with a bald face lie. You’re supposed to be the guy with the gold border around his BS, not the mouse who squeaked, or a craven lying cur.

    You disparage the Internet, yet here you are, running your mouth, and spreading hearsay, gossip, and big fat lies, trying to forge new internet myths and urban legends for morons, I suppose, and I must say, you’re just the jackass for the job.

    I’m so sorry that you are perplexed by maps. Many people use them — except women — but you seem to be suffering from the girlie delusion that I should be ashamed because I know how to read and use maps. Map envy yet. Who knew?

    But wait, there’s more. Incredibly enough, I have GPS for my car that allows me to enter any two addresses, and the doggone thing draws the route on a little map, and a slightly robotic female voice gives me driving directions. If this is the future, I think we’re almost there, but I am happy to learn that you can find your way across town without help, like a big boy. You don’t need no stinking maps.

    Now this next part may cause you to chew on your foot, even swallow it whole so you can blow it out your ass later, but during my time in the Air Force, it was my wont — actually my duty — to pontificate quite a bit, in writing no less, about places I’d never been and things I’d never seen, except as photographs, drawings, models, and maps.

    ‘Nice work, as they say, if you can get it.

    In fact, during my service, I had an assignment where I worked in a large room with dozens of airmen, and all of us churning out reports about places we’d never been.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Did you know that there are entire towns and HOAs that aren’t even on google maps? They are mostly very wealthy neighborhoods that don’t want burglars and kidnappers using google maps to target the residents for burglary and kidnapping.

    Over the years I have noticed that every time someone posts that he or she was there that day and saw the crash and the towers come down you claim the event never happened and that you have figured out it was all a gigantic fraud using the internet and google maps.

    Use google maps to check out lower manhattan the east river and Brooklyn. Manhattan and the WTC can easily be seen from much of Brooklyn.

    Thousands of people in New Jersey looked across the Hudson and saw the whole thing that day.

    If you check google maps you will see that thousands could see the whole thing

    You don’t seem to realize that maps and google maps are horizontal and flat.

    But in reality buildings are vertical. The WTC was the tallest building in New York.

    All people had to do was just look up instead of straight ahead and they could see the WTC. Didn’t they teach you that in the Air Force? I believe it’s called elevation

    Ever been to Chicago? The Sears Tower was once the tallest building in the world. It can be seen from all over downtown just by looking up at the sky and there it is.

    If I look straight ahead or down I can’t see the high rises in the Century City business district a few miles away.

    But all I have to do is look up to the sky and there they are.

    I can’t see the mountains about 15 miles to the north when I am looking straight ahead or down.

    But all I have to do is lift my head and look up and there they are.

    You were in the Air Force? Jeez how low can the standards go.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    It looks like the result of a very heavy weight - many storeys of the buildings - falling on to a temporarily resisting structure which includes a modest but substantial amount of concrete. Not surprising because that's whst happened.

    As to the LIberty isn't it one of the strongest arguments against the extreme conspiracy version that having to kill everyone made it too risky?

    Really? Grab some cinder blocks stack them up, take a few more cinder blocks and drop them on the stacked cinder blocks and report back what happens. Do all the stacked cinder blocks below explode outwards, all the way down to the bottom block? Or do the cinder blocks you drop just fracture and fall to the side of the stacked ones? Come on bud, you can’t be that ignorant. I suspect you are a paid puppet. This doesn’t take a physicist to figure out…
    Watch this video go to 4:20, 5:40, 6:40, how does the top “falling” cause floors below the top to explode outwards before the falling top even gets to that point?
    The news reporters watching it happen live seem to think it is exploding as well.

    The USS Liberty and Lavon affair part of my comment is just to prove that they have done exactly the same kind of things before to sell wars to the American public, and how similar the events are for justifying war based on lies.

    Do better this time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There are some fairly good reasons in favor of Russia's decision to intervene in Syria, which is why I have always been modestly if unenthusiastically supportive of it: It is basically a giant and continuous live training exercise for Russian pilots and generals, making it almost "free" in financial terms. The value of the Khmeimim...
  • @Ron Unz

    Just a note that the Unz.com commenter Art Deco is a lying scumbag.

    I have made a grand total of about a dozen comments on MR, most or all of which went through so far as I know.
     
    Actually, I'm pretty sure he's a fanatic Jewish-activist type, though working very hard to conceal his motives.

    Basically, he provides a vast quantity of comments, the overwhelming majority "moderate", and "mainstream," generally disputing any deviations from the Official Narrative, but in a cautious and restrained manner, often buttressed by detailed factual citations. But every now and then something about Israel or Jews may come up, and he begins making all sorts of extreme statements, much like the most extreme WashPost Neocon. You can see this if you browse his archive:

    http://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Art+Deco

    My guess is his nasty and dishonest attacks on AK are because of that SPLC denunciation a few weeks ago.

    I also strongly suspect that the "moderate/mainstream" tone of the overwhelming majority of his comments are simply intended to establish his credibility for his periodic comments on Jews/Israel.

    Given the massive volume of his comments, over 500K words, it really wouldn't surprise me if he's some sort of disinfo agent. After all, all sorts of "extremists" comment here because they've been banned everywhere else, but why would a "mainstream" fellow write 500K words of mostly "mainstream" comments here unless he was being paid to do so?...

    This is extremely silly. Art Deco posts high-quality and thought-provoking comments on a variety of websites, left and right, mainstream and obscure, and his views on Israel are no more extreme or less worthwhile than anything else he talks about.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • Anon[198] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @jacques sheete

    A “petulant, overarmed Russia” is a “security issue” for the U.S.? It would kind of seem to be the other way around.
     
    That's a real gagger. Glad I didn't waste time reading the article and instead jumped right to the comments.

    It's an old trick to blame others for what you're doing. E.g., the Reds, who openly advocated and agitated for permanent worldwide revolution, blamed the Nazis for wanting to take over the world.

    A couple of other examples,


    "Blame others for your own sins."
    J. V. Stalin, Anarchism Or Socialism ? December, 1906 — January, 1907

     


    Romans 2:1 You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge another, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.

     

    It’s interesting that the Soviets had a universal political ideology pretty much requiring world conquest/revolution, while the Nazis did not, yet the Nazis were successfully manipulated (or manipulated themselves, I don’t know which) into invading most of their neighbors. The Soviets did that too but got away with it* by hiding behind the Nazi conquests at the same time.

    *The Russian nation paid very heavily, though.

    Note: This comment form was autofilled with “Ron Unz” as commenter handle. That’s a mistake, I think?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    Here is Jackie Kennedy after her husband's death. First video is Nov. 28, 1963, less than a week after Kennedy's assassination. Second is 1964, I'm not sure but I think it is January.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP6XlHFEKNc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvqH23z9_84

    Notice that despite maintaining a dignified composure and showing grief she is sometimes smiling and is not violently agitated. Does this mean Kennedy didn't die?

    Sisters who competed to snare the world’s richest men: Schooled by their mother to seek out power, a new book reveals the jealousy between Jackie O and sister Lee and how they both bedded JFK

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5401615/The-sisters-competed-snare-worlds-richest-men.html#ixzz5DVVlponT

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Here is Jackie Kennedy after her husband's death. First video is Nov. 28, 1963, less than a week after Kennedy's assassination. Second is 1964, I'm not sure but I think it is January.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP6XlHFEKNc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvqH23z9_84

    Notice that despite maintaining a dignified composure and showing grief she is sometimes smiling and is not violently agitated. Does this mean Kennedy didn't die?

    Does this mean Kennedy didn’t die?

    That what Revusky and the Youtube Yahoos would conclude if there was Youtube in 1963: Jackie Kennedy is a crisis actor and not that good one. She should have shown more grief.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Well, Sparkon claims 9/11 didn’t happen and the WTC is still there because he couldn’t see it on google maps.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • Syrian, Iraqi, and other terrorist groups have been de-funded, crushed, and no longer receive massive amounts of weapons from deceptive agencies. Sophisticated high tech information gathering is no longer routed to them. North Korea is no longer sending ICBMs over Japan, and hasn’t tested a nuke in some time. 1000′s of human traffickers have been arrested. The mainstream media is losing its viewer base. Alternative media is overcoming The Deep State’s efforts to censor it and is instead, continuing to grow rapidly. Solid, logical, scientific evidence is ever more being released to support the existence of a personal, benevolent, and vastly powerful Supreme Being. The ability to influence events by our perception and observation of Reality is being expanded by the Double Slit Experiments, Relativity’s basic dependency on the priority of the observer/ perceiver, and other evidence/ mathematically based science.
    I would say that the above and MUCH MUCH MORE gives belief to the idea that things are getting better and the Truth is ever more coming into our existence.
    It’s a great time to be alive!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @jacques sheete

    Colonel, we haven’t had a constitution & rule of law since the National Security Act of 1947...
     
    Some would peg that almost a century prior or even earlier. The war of Northern bankers against Southern planters proved that the anti-federalists were correct in many ways.

    The constitution was a huge link in the chain around our necks.

    Rule of law? When did that ever happen?

    Partisan divisions over the military reflect much deeper cultural factors. “From the quasi-war with France [1798-1800] to the Vietnam war,” writes historian David Hackett Fischer, “the two southern cultures strongly supported every American war no matter what it was about or who it was against. Southern ideas of honour and the warrior ethic combined to create regional war fevers of great intensity in 1798, 1812, 1846, 1861, 1898, 1941, 1950 and 1965.” At the same time, the greater New England region has been home to the most intense opposition to American foreign wars-including the second world war. For 50 years, liberal American historians have spoken of “right-wing isolationists” but the fact is that most isolationists in the 1930s were liberals or leftists. Ironically, Roosevelt found the strongest supporters for his anti-Hitler foreign policy among racist Southern conservatives, who hated New Deal liberalism but were eager to save Britain and defeat Germany. The isolationist America First committee was a miserable failure in the south.

    As the southern states have gone Republican in recent years, so has America’s military, in which southern whites have always been over-represented. In November 2000, during the electoral college crisis, Democratic party operatives in the contested state of Florida tried to disqualify, on technical grounds, as many overseas ballots from US military personnel as they could, on the correct assumption that American soldiers are overwhelmingly Republican.

    What explains the deeply-ingrained military ethic of southerners-and the equally intense anti-military sentiments of greater New Englanders? Again, culture is the answer. The New England Puritans frowned on violence as a way of resolving social conflicts. The southern cavalier code, however, endorsed violence when personal or national honour was being “disrespected” or “dissed.” According to the sociologists Richard E Nisbet and Dov Cohen, although white southerners are no more likely than northern whites to kill strangers for money, they are much more likely to kill spouses, lovers, friends, and acquaintances who have insulted them. These differences explain why southern states have higher rates of homicide-and more executions. Most black Americans share southern culture (and the Latin American culture of honour is very similar). When murders committed by blacks and Latinos are not counted, the anthropologist Marvin Harris has observed, “America’s rates of violent crime are much closer to the rates found in Japan.” If southern whites were then subtracted from the murder figures, the US murder rate would be lower still.

    All of this means that the talk in recent years about a supposed “resurgence of right-wing isolationism” is misleading. Many commentators have found themselves confused by the ambitious liberal interventionism of Clinton and Gore and the right-wing isolationism of Patrick Buchanan. But neither Clinton nor Buchanan are typical of their parties. Buchanan has little influence on the Republican right, which has repudiated his isolationism as well as his protectionism. Clinton, like Gore, emerged from the shrinking southern conservative wing of the Democratic party. His southern-style interventionism was supported by many Jewish liberals who want a US forward military presence capable of protecting Israel and who viewed Serbia’s ethnic cleansing in the Balkans as a replay of the Holocaust. But the interventionist sentiments of Jewish liberals are not shared by other groups in the Democratic electoral base, like Yankees, Germanic Americans and blacks.

    This is why Europeans and Asians who believe that the Democrats will be more “internationalist” than the Republicans are mistaken. True, liberal Yankees are more in favour of constructive engagement with international institutions and norms than their southern rivals: compare the support of Clinton and Gore for the Kyoto treaty with George W Bush’s hostility to UN peacekeeping missions. But when the US uses military power-unilaterally or as part of an alliance like Nato-the fiercest opposition always comes from left-wing Democrats. Republicans may not like open-ended peace-keeping operations in the Balkans, but where US and allied security interests are clearly at stake, as in the Persian Gulf or the Taiwan Strait, they are hawks. By contrast, much of the Democratic left denounced Clinton as a war criminal during the Kosovo war. If a Republican president had led the Nato effort in the Balkans, most Democrats in Congress would probably have opposed it, just as most congressional Democrats voted against the Gulf war. Tony Blair may not like their thinking on domestic politics, but if he wants a strong Anglo-American alliance then his natural allies will be found among Anglophile Virginia Republicans, not among pacifist Democrats in Massachusetts or Oregon.

    https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/americastribes

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    The New England Puritans frowned on violence as a way of resolving social conflicts.
     
    ha

    Ask Hester Prynne.

    Puritans had a keen sense of psychological violence.
    It's still violence.
    The mouthpieces of god who mandated that violence still operated on the proposition, "Damn it, I am in charge."

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Great comment as always, but a nitpick related to one I made earlier re. 1984 analogies. The proles, despite their coarseness and ignorance, are the only subjects in Oceania that retain some basic form of humanity. They do not think, of course, but they never did (that’s why they’re proles). They are what they are, and to some extent we all have our baser concerns.

    In contrast, it is the Outer Party members who have willingly surrendered critical thought and in most cases gleefully embrace their servitude. Winston Smith is an exception, but his malignantly stupid neighbor Parsons (who welcomes his eventual arrest due to his informant daughter) is the exemplar. We see Parsons in real life here, in the form of gatekeepers, concern trolls, and other assorted cucks warning us away from drawing conclusions (logical and empirical).

    The official 9/11 account MUST be true. The HUGENESS and the AWFULNESS of it are unparalleled by anything, except for the NAZI HOLOCAUST of 6 MILLION JEWS. BIG BROTHER and MINITRUE are ALWAYS RIGHT!

    THOUGHT CRIMINALS who question the narrative are TIN FOIL HAT CONSPIRACY THEORISTS. Everyone knows that BIG EVENTS shown on TV are always true. Every RIGHT THINKING citizen knows that a BIG PLANE weighing hundreds of tons hitting a BIG BUILDING weighing hundreds of thousands of tons will cause the building to disintegrate and collapse- mostly due to the fires which were simply too intense! The only CONSPIRACY that is true is the one about the 19 Arabs with box cutters who CONSPIRED with OSAMA BIN GOLDSTEIN, who knew beforehand that the IRON supports of the building would be melted by the office fires. We have it on tape, Winston! BIG BROTHER, MINITRUE and NIST are ALWAYS RIGHT! How could a HUGE THING like this be a lie?

    “…in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.

    It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.”

    Read More
    • Agree: Mike P
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Hyperborean
    Just because the people selling their country to the highest bidder only care about getting the highest price doesn't mean ordinary Georgians don't resent it.

    Considering how even in full-pozzed London I've heard ordinary people complain about all the foreign oligarchs buying up everything, I don't find it hard to believe that Georgians might find it painful.

    OK – makes sense – it’s much of the same everywhere; the elite sell out the locals to the highest bidder.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thorfinnsson


    2. Another factor driving Georgian tourism is that it’s really prestigious among the Moscow yuppie hipster crowd. For instance, one acquaintance of mine – half-Jewish, MacBook toting “creative” person – is going there to get married this weekend. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has this sort of “soft power” among the spending classes.
     
    Why?

    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?

    Saakashvili?

    Georgia to me is another irrelevant joke. Of course I'm not Russian.

    I’ve never have been. But you can see the popularity for people.

    Relatively cheap flight – and you end up in an exotic (but easy to navigate culturally/linguistically) destination, with colourful local people/traditions.

    Everything is also cheap and you can eat Georgian cuisine a lot more cheaply than in restaurants outside Georgia.

    As Karlin says – they are also clever at viral marketing themselves to kind of hipster, middle class tastes

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Seamus Day

    A conservative Scottish pastor at a Baptist Church I visited, credibly summed up the purpose of war, more accurately than Augustine:

    “The purpose of war is to take what belongs to someone else.”
     

    Bullshit. The cost of most of our recent wars is orders of magnitude more than could ever be taken from these countries. That’s why the ‘war for oil’ slogan of the left is so stupid. We spent trillions in Iraq. You don’t spend trillions for oil.

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.

    I peg it as collective American, and by extension collective Western, insanity.

    We’re not going to cure ourselves – we should be in the civilization equivalent of a straight-jacket, barring that, maybe we should be put out of our misery.

    And BTW, the older generations to whom I’ve spoken mostly know what’s what. They know in their gut that their societies and their children have no future, and most are banking on being dead when the predictable collapse occurs.

    Yup, the Boomers do not give a shit, and just want to live comfortably and then die. We are now at the end game.

    Give it 20 years, maximum. 20 years – a blink of an eye in historical terms.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mike P
    I suspect that the government's fear of societal collapse - brought on by the impending collapse of the petrodollar, which the Empire is in vain trying to ward off by its perpetual wars in the Middle East and its feeble attempts at economic war on China - is behind the recent push for disarming the public. The prospect of a fully armed populace rioting in the streets is indeed a scary one.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Thorfinnsson


    2. Another factor driving Georgian tourism is that it’s really prestigious among the Moscow yuppie hipster crowd. For instance, one acquaintance of mine – half-Jewish, MacBook toting “creative” person – is going there to get married this weekend. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has this sort of “soft power” among the spending classes.
     
    Why?

    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?

    Saakashvili?

    Georgia to me is another irrelevant joke. Of course I'm not Russian.

    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?

    Correct, though only true for the sovok generation.

    Georgian restaurants in the USSR played the role of French restaurants in the US, as the elite place to go to place for status signalling purposes. Only French cuisine really is world class, whereas Georgian cuisine isn’t (same for the wines). Now that there are mid-range Georgian establishments, the older Soviet people like to frequent them, since they continue to regard them as prestigious, even though there are no end of much cheaper (and better) restaurants and eateries.

    For the Moscow yuppies I think it’s more about Georgia’s (admittedly not entirely fictive) success at larping as a “European” country. This allows them to status signal how European and progressive they are.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry

    For the Moscow yuppies I think it’s more about Georgia’s (admittedly not entirely fictive) success at larping as a “European” country. This allows them to status signal how European and progressive they are.
     
    It's a good hypothesis - but I'm not sure that can be true for people who actually like their holiday in Georgia though.

    People I know was there, say that they like it because how cheap, primitive and 'crazy' the atmosphere is - the kind of same reason people talk about countries like India or Mexico.

    The kind of tourists who like clean, European destinations - it's a slightly different taste, although sure there's plenty who like both (both primitive and sophisticated destinations, but it's difficult to confuse them).

    I like both kind of destinations but I would not confuse them.

    I like the developed and posh places like Cambridge and Oxford and Salzburg. But also like undeveloped looking places like Israel. But although Israel is economically rich and allied with Western powers, you could never confuse it on the ground with a Western country. Israel is very primitive, Middle Eastern, chaotic, undeveloped atmosphere country. On the ground, surely much more similar to Tehran (not that I have been there), than to New York .

    The way a country allies is not so much reflected in the experience a tourist has. For example, in Moscow, you get a much more 'Western European' style experience than you would get in (say) Mexico City.

    And the kind of energy you get in Georgia will surely be quite an opposite, of what you get in the actual West.
    , @Art Deco
    Georgian restaurants in the USSR played the role of French restaurants in the US, as the elite place to go to place for status signalling purposes.

    They did? I can't recall a single one in my home town, where live 600,000 people and (at one time) the world headquarters of several major corporations.



    Only French cuisine really is world class, w

    "World class"? What does that even mean? Are you referring to quality, snob appeal, or something else?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Anon[198] • Disclaimer says:
    @utu
    Christine Leinonen

    The crisis actors meme became quite popular among Youtube Yahoos (also called falseflaggots) who after every terrorist or mass shooting event end up searching for the crisis actors in available video footages. Usually it takes them just few hours after an event to proclaim that they found some crisis actors. The alleged crisis actors often will be the only "evidence" they will have "proving" the "falseflagginess" or "hoaxness" of the event.

    The Youtube Yahoos base their conclusions on their idea how people should or should not express or act out their emotions like in the case of Christine Leinonen who according to Youtube Yahoos did not express her grief according to Youtube Yahoos' idea about grief manifestation.

    Where do the Youtube Yahoos get their idea how grief is expressed and manifested? Obviously from movies, sitcoms and soaps where these emotions are countlessly acted by actual actors who learned to act them based on other actors not the reality, extreme method actors excepted who may go to funerals to observe people. The emotion of grief for any singular person is rare and any person has only few occasions in her lifetime to observe them in reality while she sees them all the time in the virtual reality acted by actors. If you watch TV you can see it several times a day.

    Basically what Revusky is telling us is that Christine Leinonen did not act as actresses he saw in the movies and soaps on TV. He claims that Christine Leinonen acted artificially unlike the actresses on TV.

    Revusky, when you watch your favorite soap try to keep in mind that what you see is not real. I know it might be hard for somebody who is consumed by his favorite soap but it is prerequisite for somebody who tries to parse the surrounding reality.

    Here is Jackie Kennedy after her husband’s death. First video is Nov. 28, 1963, less than a week after Kennedy’s assassination. Second is 1964, I’m not sure but I think it is January.

    Notice that despite maintaining a dignified composure and showing grief she is sometimes smiling and is not violently agitated. Does this mean Kennedy didn’t die?

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu

    Does this mean Kennedy didn’t die?
     
    That what Revusky and the Youtube Yahoos would conclude if there was Youtube in 1963: Jackie Kennedy is a crisis actor and not that good one. She should have shown more grief.
    , @utu
    Sisters who competed to snare the world's richest men: Schooled by their mother to seek out power, a new book reveals the jealousy between Jackie O and sister Lee and how they both bedded JFK

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5401615/The-sisters-competed-snare-worlds-richest-men.html#ixzz5DVVlponT
    , @Sean
    I blame those twenty German air stewardesses he ruptured himself shagging (on meth as usual) at a pool party just before Dallas. He heard the first shot but the full-torso brace he was wearing made him unable to duck.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • TG says:

    An interesting post. Agreed. Some other points.

    1. Despite massive propaganda to the contrary, the last presidential election the American people clearly voted against wasting trillions of dollars on endless pointless wars of choice, and for spending that money on ourselves. As usual, however, there is no true Democracy in the United States, and we continue to pursue the status quo, the people be damned. But while it gets virtually zero news coverage, yes, Americans in general do NOT like what is going on.

    2. One is reminded that massive citizen armies are a modern aberration. For most of recorded history, for better or worse, wars were fought by relatively few professional troops. It’s not new.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mark James

    we count on these less affluent Americans to volunteer for military service

     

    Mondoweiss had an interesting piece recently stating that Baptists, Catholics, LDS contribute the highest personnel numbers --percentage wise-- to the Armed Services. While Methodists, Congregationalists, Jews the fewest. Even Muslims have a greater percentage than Jews (surprising...no).

    The point is that in as long as educational benefits, medical care (for life) and a notion of service as a noble calling continue to be valued by a significant portion of the poor/lower middle class, the wealthiest among us will have numbers to project militarily. And it won't be from their families.

    It was over ten years ago, and it said Buddhists were more represented than Jews, not Muslims. Muslims are as underrepresented as other overclass religions.

    http://mondoweiss.net/2006/08/the_true_defini/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    1. Armenia has actually done quite well, I think. Considering it's surrounded by hostile states on two sides, and has to spend a lot of $$$ on the military, this is all the more impressive.

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/developing-transition.png

    2. Another factor driving Georgian tourism is that it's really prestigious among the Moscow yuppie hipster crowd. For instance, one acquaintance of mine - half-Jewish, MacBook toting "creative" person - is going there to get married this weekend. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has this sort of "soft power" among the spending classes.

    3. The Caucasus isn't anywhere near the top of my to go list (that's reserved for China, India, and a bunch of Mediterranean and ME places, inc. Israel and Iran). However, if I was to go there, I'd go to Armenia or Azerbaijan before Georgia. Armenia has a more impressive history, while Baku is the biggest city in the region and people say good things about it. Last draw is Georgian cuisine, but I am of the opinion that it's grossly overrated.

    3. The Caucasus isn’t anywhere near the top of my to go list (that’s reserved for China, India, and a bunch of Mediterranean and ME places, inc. Israel and Iran). However, if I was to go there, I’d go to Armenia or Azerbaijan before Georgia. Armenia has a more impressive history, while Baku is the biggest city in the region and people say good things about it. Last draw is Georgian cuisine, but I am of the opinion that it’s grossly overrated.

    Sure – I feel the same. I’m much more excited to think about visiting places like Cuba or Argentina. But Tbilisi or Baku are a cheap ‘weekend’, it is not comparable to more expensive holidays.

    Iran will be interesting with the visa-restriction going to be removed soon – but presumably the kind of place it would be easier to visit in a tour-group.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    It would be pretty strange for Armenians to not like their only guarantor against Azeri designs on their territory, and their only friend in the region apart from Iran.

    (Though as Felix correctly points out, not exactly something that would bother Russians, since Armenia benefits from the relationship far more).

    But it's not strange, because you are making things up, as you are regrettably wont to. In reality, Armenia is one of the few countries where Putin is even more popular than in Russia itself.

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/world-map-putin-approval-2015-details.png

    What is interesting about that map is how the world community thinks about things vs the “world community” (i.e. all the puppets of the US that the media declares to be the world).

    With India and China you already have a big chunk of the world population, assuming that the rest of Africa leans like Nigeria and Congo, then you have the bulk of world actually being pro and not anti, contradicting the narrative of the cuckservative and SJW media.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thorfinnsson


    2. Another factor driving Georgian tourism is that it’s really prestigious among the Moscow yuppie hipster crowd. For instance, one acquaintance of mine – half-Jewish, MacBook toting “creative” person – is going there to get married this weekend. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has this sort of “soft power” among the spending classes.
     
    Why?

    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?

    Saakashvili?

    Georgia to me is another irrelevant joke. Of course I'm not Russian.

    Why?
    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?
    Saakashvili?
    Georgia to me is another irrelevant joke. Of course I’m not Russian.

    Maybe some Russians are making pilgrimages.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin_Museum,_Gori

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Miro23

    I think you may be making the mistake of seeing the French Revolution as a spontaneous uprising of the oppressed masses. Most of the revolutions of the 17th and 18th centuries were uprisings of the increasingly powerful and wealthy middle classes who weren’t exploited or oppressed but who saw the chance of looting the aristocracy.
     
    Who was looting who? As background, my view is that aristocracies have to earn their position a national leaders. Early on it was quite straightforward, and usually on the battlefield, for example John Churchill, the 1st Duke of Marlborough:

    His leadership of the allied armies consolidated Britain's emergence as a front-rank power. He successfully maintained unity among the allies, thereby demonstrating his diplomatic skills. Throughout ten consecutive campaigns during the Spanish Succession war, Marlborough held together a discordant coalition through his sheer force of personality and raised the standing of British arms to a level not known since the Middle Ages. Although in the end he could not compel total capitulation from his enemies, his victories allowed Britain to rise from a minor to a major power, ensuring the country's growing prosperity throughout the 18th century.

    Wikipedia.
     
    But by the "Belle Epoque" 1871-1914 European aristocracies were a useless decadent elite.

    I would connect the rise in power of the commercial middle classes and industrialists to the Industrial Revolution. They were contributing more and wanted political power, and they got it through their money and democracy (actually allied with the old aristocracy) with the downside of the not so welcome growth of a politically aware working class.

    For me this was the start of a classic problem that still hasn't been resolved. The commercial and industrial elite should be the new aristocracy on grounds of wealth, power and influence, but they are motivated by the desire for private profit and will manipulate the state to enrich themselves. Classic 21st century USA.

    The French revolution set the scene, and was somewhat earlier 1789 - 1799, but it's a fact that all French non-aristocratic classes were exploited and oppressed through excessive taxation - and I would accept the consensus that this triggered the revolution.

    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dfordoom

    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.
     
    Agreed. Treachery seemed to run in the Churchill family.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Art Deco
    There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia –

    Known to you, but not to Russian census enumerators.

    The census will only track a fraction of emigrants/workers. You can see above that officials are not using it when estimating for this question.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    You mean they'll find them once you've told them where to look.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Felix Keverich

    They’ll be lower than the cost of LNG.

    They will not be lower than the cost of gas compared to other major producing countries such as Canada, Russia, Qatar, etc.

     

    You forgot about Iran. Iran has massive natural gas production, but can't export due to sanctions, so gas in Iran is practically free. You want America to be more like Iran?

    Obviously, allowing more exports will raise the prices on the domestic market. But I can guarantee they will still be much lower than prices in SE Asia, where US will export.

    You want America to be more like Iran?

    Give the CSA a chance, brother.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Felix Keverich

    They’ll be lower than the cost of LNG.

    They will not be lower than the cost of gas compared to other major producing countries such as Canada, Russia, Qatar, etc.

     

    You forgot about Iran. Iran has massive natural gas production, but can't export due to sanctions, so gas in Iran is practically free. You want America to be more like Iran?

    Obviously, allowing more exports will raise the prices on the domestic market. But I can guarantee they will still be much lower than prices in SE Asia, where US will export.

    There are other major gas producers besides the one I listed, yes, and not just Iran.

    The USA unlike Iran has no barriers to global trade (other than idiotic self-imposed ones thanks to our sanctions love affair), and we are a much more developed country with a much better business climate.

    The shale boom has led to a renaissance in the US chemicals industry, which previously had been migrating offshore for decades in pursuit of lower input costs.

    I’m not able to find it now, but a few years ago the CEO of Dow Chemicals wrote an essay decrying the rush to export surplus gas. He produced a list of $100 billion worth of capital investment being made in America owing to low gas prices. Other corporate executives denounced him for “protectionism” since our business class has largely gotten high on its own supply.

    My general position is that with the exception of labor costs it should be government policy to keep input costs as low as possible (without resorting to subsidies of course) in order to gain a competitive edge against rival foreign countries. We’re not any better at engineering or management than Western Europe or Japan, but we do have bountiful natural resources unlike them.

    It’s okay to export surplus raw materials within reason, but you never want to do so when the opportunity cost results in foreign industries adding value instead of your own industries. Mercantilism 101.

    It’s not enough to have lower gas prices than gas importing countries. Gas prices must be competitive with other major gas producing countries where modern industrial plants can be constructed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    I've read this viewpoint (I think in Bloomberg article).

    But a lot of industry can be made more competitive through productivity gains and investment in capital. Not from having cheaper energy costs.

    If you can compare it to farming for example. America did not become the world's largest food exporter, by 'lowering the costs of water and soil'.

    It came from the investment in capital/technology.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @JL
    So Sargsyan resigned his post as PM. Perhaps Avery could comment on what to expect next?

    I suspect that the Parliament will appoint Karen Karapetyan as PM.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Chuck
    Somehow I knew (((German_reader))) would make an appearance on this thread.

    No he is just a good German on the cuck side . He probably is not ((()))).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @anonymous
    Everything that I've read here sourced to TomDispatch sounds like something one might hear on NPR. If "Andrew J. Bacevich is trying to write a book about how we got Trump," then he might do well to look in the mirror.

    My best guess after reading this column is that he wants Uncle Sam to conscript my kids to

    - keep China from "rising"

    - be stationed in eastern Poland to glare across the border at "petulant and over-armed Russia"

    - wage a Great War On Climate Change

    But why? Notice the pronoun propaganda worthy of Pat Buchanan:

    "The root cause of our predicament is the all-volunteer force. Only when we ordinary citizens conclude that we have an obligation to contribute to the country’s defense will it become possible to devise a set of principles for raising, organizing, supporting, and employing U.S. forces that align with our professed values and our actual security requirements."

    Of course, the author would entrust these purported reforms to the Congress, which is going to rein in the Commander-In-Chief like it did back in [******].

    Many of "we ordinary citizens" have come to realize that nothing run from Washington -- especially military forces deployed outside "our" country -- has much to do "with our professed values and our actual security requirements." And it never, ever will.

    The idea is that an army of conscripts, that is, of citizens, may be a little more responsible than an army of unemployed robots. Before there was general conscription the military were a collection of psychopaths. General conscription diluted their preponderance in the armed forces. The use of a lottery to conscript during Vietnam was a device to stop protests.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Uebersetzer
    There was a gigantic, organised slaughter of European Jews in the 1940s. I did research in two apparently unrelated areas to it and curiously enough, Jewish victims of the Nazis are present.
    1. The Good Soldier Svejk by the Czech writer Jaroslav Hasek. A character in the novel is a Cadet Biegler. Many characters were based on real-life characters known to the author. One of them was Hans Bigler.
    http://honsi.org/literature/svejk/?page=11&lang=en#Bigler
    Bigler's father Eduard was killed in Bergen-Belsen in 1944, on account of being Jewish. It is not clear whether Hans Bigler was fully Jewish or part-Jewish although the latter is more likely - half-Jews generally speaking survived the Nazi era although they were despised as Mischlinge. Hans Bigler seems to have attributed his own survival to an Allied air raid on Dresden, where he then lived, destroying Gestapo records.
    2. A Nazi-era (1937) German film called Unternehmen Michael set during the German offensives of 1918. A supporting role in the film was played by the actor Paul Otto. Otto was in fact Jewish but this was not discovered until 1943. When it was discovered, Otto committed suicide with his wife shortly before being deported to the "East".
    If the Holocaust was a hoax, why was Eduard Bigler killed? And why did a respected German actor like Paul Otto opt for suicide when he was discovered to be of Jewish origin and about to be deported to Auschwitz, Treblinka or some such destination?
    https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0653288/?ref_=tt_cl_t2

    Cadet Bigler: People Bergen Belsen usually died from diseases caused by overwork and malnutrition rather than being murdered.

    Paul Otto: indeed people kill themselves out of fear of death which always strikes me as strange.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    1. Armenia has actually done quite well, I think. Considering it's surrounded by hostile states on two sides, and has to spend a lot of $$$ on the military, this is all the more impressive.

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/developing-transition.png

    2. Another factor driving Georgian tourism is that it's really prestigious among the Moscow yuppie hipster crowd. For instance, one acquaintance of mine - half-Jewish, MacBook toting "creative" person - is going there to get married this weekend. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has this sort of "soft power" among the spending classes.

    3. The Caucasus isn't anywhere near the top of my to go list (that's reserved for China, India, and a bunch of Mediterranean and ME places, inc. Israel and Iran). However, if I was to go there, I'd go to Armenia or Azerbaijan before Georgia. Armenia has a more impressive history, while Baku is the biggest city in the region and people say good things about it. Last draw is Georgian cuisine, but I am of the opinion that it's grossly overrated.

    I’m not sure how to read the graph – i.e. I’m not sure what is the y axis showing?

    About the general economic situation.

    http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=15&pr.y=6&sy=1999&ey=2016&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=911%2C912%2C922%2C915%2C186%2C926&s=NGDPD%2CPPPGDP%2CNGDPDPC%2CPPPPC%2CLP%2CGGXWDG_NGDP&grp=0&a=

    I looked at the countries in the IMF database – I’m not sure how negatively to interpret their situation overall? I think of all the economies, it is the one I would like the least after Ukraine (the three – Armenia, Georgia, Ukraine – with negative population growth).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • So Sargsyan resigned his post as PM. Perhaps Avery could comment on what to expect next?

    Read More
    • Replies: @g2k
    I suspect that the Parliament will appoint Karen Karapetyan as PM.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Thorfinnsson
    They'll be lower than the cost of LNG.

    They will not be lower than the cost of gas compared to other major producing countries such as Canada, Russia, Qatar, etc.

    This has already happened in Australia in fact.

    http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/gas-cartel-is-pushing-gas-prices-up-in-australia/news-story/61acc1864d54fb6eb4801c332e683fbd

    And it appears that in parts of Australia gas is somehow now more expensive than LNG in Japan.

    Between 2006 and 2015, increases to residential gas prices ranged from 23 per cent in Victoria, to 74 per cent in Tasmania.

    Industrial users saw price increases ranging from 16 per cent in Tasmania to 113 per cent in North West Queensland.
    [...]
    Much of the blame for high gas prices has been linked to increased demand after three export terminals were built in Gladstone that enabled companies to ship gas overseas for the first time, combined with a low oil price that has discouraged gas exploration, as well as restrictions on gas exploration and development in states.
     

    The United States should strictly limit its gas exports and ban the building of any new thermal fossil fuel electric powerstations in order to keep domestic gas prices as low as possible.

    Of course, this will require rounding up atomophobes and herding them into concentration camps. The trout fishermen who don't understand the concept of "fish ladders" in dams also require reeducation. But these things are already 100% necessary.

    Coal should continue to be used at existing powerstations for economic reasons, but no new ones should be constructed. Export infrastructure to deliver coal to Asia must be built. Currently this is being held up by environmentalist criminals in Washington state for "water use" reasons. These people need to be rounded up and shot.

    They’ll be lower than the cost of LNG.

    They will not be lower than the cost of gas compared to other major producing countries such as Canada, Russia, Qatar, etc.

    You forgot about Iran. Iran has massive natural gas production, but can’t export due to sanctions, so gas in Iran is practically free. You want America to be more like Iran?

    Obviously, allowing more exports will raise the prices on the domestic market. But I can guarantee they will still be much lower than prices in SE Asia, where US will export.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thorfinnsson
    There are other major gas producers besides the one I listed, yes, and not just Iran.

    The USA unlike Iran has no barriers to global trade (other than idiotic self-imposed ones thanks to our sanctions love affair), and we are a much more developed country with a much better business climate.

    The shale boom has led to a renaissance in the US chemicals industry, which previously had been migrating offshore for decades in pursuit of lower input costs.

    I'm not able to find it now, but a few years ago the CEO of Dow Chemicals wrote an essay decrying the rush to export surplus gas. He produced a list of $100 billion worth of capital investment being made in America owing to low gas prices. Other corporate executives denounced him for "protectionism" since our business class has largely gotten high on its own supply.

    My general position is that with the exception of labor costs it should be government policy to keep input costs as low as possible (without resorting to subsidies of course) in order to gain a competitive edge against rival foreign countries. We're not any better at engineering or management than Western Europe or Japan, but we do have bountiful natural resources unlike them.

    It's okay to export surplus raw materials within reason, but you never want to do so when the opportunity cost results in foreign industries adding value instead of your own industries. Mercantilism 101.

    It's not enough to have lower gas prices than gas importing countries. Gas prices must be competitive with other major gas producing countries where modern industrial plants can be constructed.

    , @Mitleser

    You want America to be more like Iran?
     
    Give the CSA a chance, brother.

    https://d1u5p3l4wpay3k.cloudfront.net/alphacentauri_en/b/bd/AC_Fac_Ldr_002.png
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @eD
    "There are striking parallels between the collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the current paroxysms of NATO. In each case, the struggle is not between the hegemon and the satellites – the struggle is between hard-line satellites and soft-line satellites. Tsipras is NATO’s Dubchek. May is NATO’s Honecker. Corbin is NATO’s Mielke. Orban is NATO’s Grósz. Trump is NATO’s Gorbachev."

    This is a fascinating analogy. That would make Macron NATO's Ceausescu. I'm not sure what that would make Trudeau.

    “I’m not sure what that would make Trudeau.”

    I am not familiar enough with the old Warsaw Pact leaders. However, if you are known by the company you keep, Trudeau’s pals – John Dalglish and Christopher Ingvaldson – might lead some, who don’t like Trudeau, to consider the term, pedophile.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @Talha

    How do regular Sunnis see this? A success, a failure or what?
     
    I cannot arrogate myself to speak on behalf of all Sunnis. I can only speak of the ones I am most familiar with - traditional ones and even more moderate minded ones are not happy with Saudi, that's being generous. Saudi has not only helped destroy Syria but has caused a humanitarian crisis in Yemen.

    That said, I don't know of a single Sunni in my circle who likes the Assad regime. Many of them, like myself feel his saving grace is that the people who would replace him after the civil war are even worse.

    My personal go to person on these matters is Shaykh Muhammad Yaqoubi who is a traditional scholar (and Sufi shaykh) in exile in Moroccco. He is very out-spoken about the damage done by Saudis to the Muslim world, yet is also against the Assad regime. He spoke out against the regime early on and had to leave the country, however - as early as 2015 he was stating publicly; " continuing the fight is no longer in the interest of Syrians."

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.

    Peace.

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.

    Thanks for your informed opinion. These things are not so clear looking from the outside, and Western reporting seems to be mostly useless.

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.
     
    I would certainly say so. The average Sunni and Shiah get along OK - we're not super chummy; they have their mosques and we have ours and we usually don't pray behind each other - this is unlike say the various Sunni schools that may have slight variations in prayer, but make it a point to pray behind each other. It's really only the takfiris that want to kill Shiah (as well as plenty of Sunnis they consider deviant). I had friends in UCLA who were Shiah, still do even though I consider myself as Orthodox Sunni as they come and believe Shiah positions are heterodox (and they reciprocate).

    This whole thing was really kicked off with the invasion of Iraq and the forces it unleashed. In times of desperation, war, crisis etc. some of the worst elements of society come out and this is simply part of human nature.

    Take for instance the break up of Yugoslavia. Let's put the Muslims aside for a bit. In that conflict, once civil order broke down; Orthodox Serbs and Catholic Croats committed war crimes against each other's populations. Things were going fine for a good long while, but this brought divisions, that most people really hadn't cared about, to a crescendo.

    Another good example before this whole mess is the Armenia-Azerbaijan war in the 90's. Azerbaijan is almost 90% Shiah, but plenty of Sunni volunteers went to fight on their side.

    There is little doubt in my head that much of this would simply not have occurred without the external interference. That doesn't mean that, naively, everything was fine and dandy - rather external forces were the catalyst for the mess we see today.

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Seamus Day

    A conservative Scottish pastor at a Baptist Church I visited, credibly summed up the purpose of war, more accurately than Augustine:

    “The purpose of war is to take what belongs to someone else.”
     

    Bullshit. The cost of most of our recent wars is orders of magnitude more than could ever be taken from these countries. That’s why the ‘war for oil’ slogan of the left is so stupid. We spent trillions in Iraq. You don’t spend trillions for oil.

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.

    In other words “To take their stuff”. Why else have a “puppet regime”?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    The purposes of America's fake wars are not complex. Its the desire of adolescents to be war heroes, ie the American version of the medieval saint, plus a lot of cowboy excitement from shooting off lots of guns and missiles. Add in the vast amounts of money and prestige the military engenders in adolescent or pubescent American society, and you end up with a gigantic bureaucracy desperate with the need for war, and the ability to create as many wars as it wants via its ownership of the media and political system. What happens to the invaded and regime changed victim country is largely irrelevant, as by that time the American war machine, grossly obese like everything else in America, has moved on to its next theater of excitement and thrills.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ronald Thomas West

    "Thucydides’s famed .. “The strong do what they will, while the weak suffer what they must.”"
     
    Well, colonel, in case of Thucydides, I'd go with “Their judgment was based more upon blind wishing than upon any sound pre-vision; for it is a habit of mankind to entrust to careless hope what they long for, and to use sovereign reason to thrust aside what they do not fancy” pointing to human nature hasn't changed one bit, bringing up the more apropos:

    “The extension of the empire has meant the growth of private fortunes. This is nothing new, indeed it is in keeping with the most ancient history” -Gaius Asinius Gallus (from Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome)

    Meanwhile, under the terms of our military system, attention to how this money actually gets spent by our yet-to-be-audited Pentagon tends to be — to put the matter politely — spotty
     
    Just come out and say "Criminal." Or, look at whose books THE PENTAGON is auditing:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/30/usaid-in-central-africa/

    The legal profession exists to implement the rule of law. We hope that the result is some approximation of justice
     
    Colonel, we haven't had a constitution & rule of law since the National Security Act of 1947. What we have is called "color of law." You might wish to study up on that:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/12/01/the-oath-and-the-trash-bin/

    I don’t know about you, but I worry more about the implications of China’s rise and Russian misbehavior than I do about Islamic terrorism. And I worry more about changing weather patterns here in New England or somebody shutting down the electrical grid in my home town than I do about what Beijing and Moscow may be cooking up
     
    That's just oymoronish stupid (typo?) because it's our military and intelligence agencies combined behavior, inclusive of radicalizing Islam and setting it loose in Western China and Russia's Caucus, is no small reason for those rising giants looking at us like we're rabid dogs. BTW if you're really worried about the grid going down, well, you might have a look at EMP:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/10/14/devolution-part-1/

    As for:

    "The generals who followed one another in presiding over that war are undoubtedly estimable, well-intentioned men..."
     
    The colonel is just flat out wrong; and I don't give a rat's a** if I was a mere sergeant and Bacevich was a colonel, because I went on to work in the trenches investigating corruption and the colonel went to the la-la-land of the ivory tower. Here's the real score:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/05/26/counterfeit-coin/

    All in all, the colonel's article is a fail.

    Pat Lang should’ve glanced at the comments to Bacevich’s writings before he posted on Unz,

    The Unz commentariat refuses to be censored or to self-censor (thank you Ron Unz, 1000 X).

    UFers call BS when they smell it.

    Lang scurried back to his gated spiderhole & winged about “delusional” commenters at Unz.

    Don’t let the door hit ya.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ronald Thomas West
    The way I see it, they're [both colonels] shaped by environment and recall Franz Fannon:

    “Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn’t fit in with the core belief”

    This can be expected of non-professionals and even professionals that are 'bought in.' But when said parties are claiming to be dissident, stepping 1/2 way out of the perception bubble doesn't cut it, either yourself open to what's actually going on, get at least a little bit humble and stay with the learning curve, or your stuff can get stepped on.

    I did see Lang's whining at 'SST' and he lost a lot of respect from your's truly
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Butcher of Damascus. Gasser of children. Baby Killer of Syria. Tool of Moscow. Cruel despot. Monster. These are all names the western media and politicians routinely heap on Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad. He has now become the top Mideast villain, the man we love to hate. As a veteran Mideast watcher, I find all this...
  • @LondonBob
    Nothing fake about the German atrocities against Belgian civilians, see Dinant. Anyway Britain was allied with the Tsar so the media gatekeepers kept up a steady drumbeat of pro German propaganda so that Anglo-Saxon America could not aid her sister country sooner.

    Does Belgium exist for any reason other than to trigger British entry into Continental wars?

    Does Great Britain exist for any reason other than to import governing majorities of Pakistani Muslims and generate dossiers on American Presidential candidates?

    Great job drawing up the modern Middle East, by the way.

    Next time you decide to enter a war to keep Germany from becoming the top industrial power on the Continent I think we’ll sit that one out.

    Read More
    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Mike P

    The problem is not with the US military. It is with the post-military strategy, for which the military is ill-equipped to handle. It’s not the military that is deciding to stay forever.
     
    The failure to rebuild functioning nation states and the "need" for continuous occupation are not bugs but features. The ongoing occupation of Afghanistan has nothing to do with "fighting terror" or "spreading democracy and freedom" - it is to encircle Iran and preventing it from linking up with China. Afghanistan cannot be allowed to make its own decisions in this matter, so it must endure the occupation.

    Former Afghan President Hamid Karzai believes Russia can play a decisive role in ending America’s longest war

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-28/ex-afghan-leader-karzai-sees-russia-as-key-to-peace-with-taliban

    With talk like this I’m sure the Western “intel” agencies are plotting to take Karzai out and replace him with another puppet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    1. Armenia has actually done quite well, I think. Considering it's surrounded by hostile states on two sides, and has to spend a lot of $$$ on the military, this is all the more impressive.

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/developing-transition.png

    2. Another factor driving Georgian tourism is that it's really prestigious among the Moscow yuppie hipster crowd. For instance, one acquaintance of mine - half-Jewish, MacBook toting "creative" person - is going there to get married this weekend. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has this sort of "soft power" among the spending classes.

    3. The Caucasus isn't anywhere near the top of my to go list (that's reserved for China, India, and a bunch of Mediterranean and ME places, inc. Israel and Iran). However, if I was to go there, I'd go to Armenia or Azerbaijan before Georgia. Armenia has a more impressive history, while Baku is the biggest city in the region and people say good things about it. Last draw is Georgian cuisine, but I am of the opinion that it's grossly overrated.

    2. Another factor driving Georgian tourism is that it’s really prestigious among the Moscow yuppie hipster crowd. For instance, one acquaintance of mine – half-Jewish, MacBook toting “creative” person – is going there to get married this weekend. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has this sort of “soft power” among the spending classes.

    Why?

    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?

    Saakashvili?

    Georgia to me is another irrelevant joke. Of course I’m not Russian.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen

    Why?
    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?
    Saakashvili?
    Georgia to me is another irrelevant joke. Of course I’m not Russian.
     
    Maybe some Russians are making pilgrimages.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin_Museum,_Gori

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stalin%C5%AFv_rodn%C3%BD_d%C5%AFm.JPG
    , @Anatoly Karlin

    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?
     
    Correct, though only true for the sovok generation.

    Georgian restaurants in the USSR played the role of French restaurants in the US, as the elite place to go to place for status signalling purposes. Only French cuisine really is world class, whereas Georgian cuisine isn't (same for the wines). Now that there are mid-range Georgian establishments, the older Soviet people like to frequent them, since they continue to regard them as prestigious, even though there are no end of much cheaper (and better) restaurants and eateries.

    For the Moscow yuppies I think it's more about Georgia's (admittedly not entirely fictive) success at larping as a "European" country. This allows them to status signal how European and progressive they are.
    , @Dmitry
    I've never have been. But you can see the popularity for people.

    Relatively cheap flight - and you end up in an exotic (but easy to navigate culturally/linguistically) destination, with colourful local people/traditions.

    Everything is also cheap and you can eat Georgian cuisine a lot more cheaply than in restaurants outside Georgia.

    As Karlin says - they are also clever at viral marketing themselves to kind of hipster, middle class tastes


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsH1IUF8ESA
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Polish Perspective

    Poland, for example, receives around twice as much free money or aid from the EU, than the entire world UN annual budget. I guess Poland might be the most aid receiving country in the world? (I wonder if anyone has done calculations of this topic?)

     

    https://i.imgur.com/yNvMzzD.jpg

    Poland isn't even in the top 5 once you adjust for GNI. It's true that Poland gets most in absolute terms, but that's also because we are way bigger than most EE countries. I find a lot of economic innumerate to fail to understand this point and just repeat "yes but they get THIS MANY BILLIONS". But without adjusting for economic size is meaningless. Sad to see that you are not smarter than this, Dmitry.

    Also, this is counted from the year 2000. The latest EU funds flow constitute about 1% of our GNI according to our central bank. The next one will be half that, even if no change is done, simply on account of a growing economy and a closer realignment to the EU median.

    Furthermore, whenever we are talking about EU funds this should be kept in mind:

    https://i.imgur.com/YNiPO03.png

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge ("see, it's only thanks to us because of us generous we are!"). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.

    You can see this in sector after sector. Take retail. A German goes to shop in Aldi, Lidl or Kaufmann. All domestic firms. Poles and Czechs shop at the same stores, with Carrefour thrown into the mix. As you can see from the chart, the most drained country of us all is Czechia. No wonder euroskepticism is high there.

    And I haven't even talked about the fact that Western European countries benefit massively from labour and we lose, in some instances permanently.

    There’s nothing ignorant in noting that Poland has received more of the aid than any of the countries.

    You can interpret this how you like, or complain that it still hasn’t received the most in per capita terms. The country/economy has the received most, and the numbers are amazing.

    But if Ukraine thinks they can repeat the story in the future, it is going to be heavily disappointed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Dmitry
    There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia - and numbers are probably higher considering the situation with illegal and undocumented immigrants.

    As for emigration rate, the majority come to Russia on work permits. However, if we look just at the minority that successfully obtain Russian citizenship - almost 1% of the total population in Armenia obtains Russian citizenship each year.

    There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia –

    Known to you, but not to Russian census enumerators.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    The census will only track a fraction of emigrants/workers. You can see above that officials are not using it when estimating for this question.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @reiner Tor
    OTOH the Americans were also quite opposed to both Streams. I remember back when in 2008 the then leftist Hungarian PM Gyurcsány had good relations with Putin, and pushed for South Stream, and the Americans were criticizing us for it.

    OTOH the Americans were also quite opposed to both Streams.

    “OTOH”? This isn’t really up to a debate. The only side who is interested in stopping these pipelines is the US. The European Comission is simply following orders from the US.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Antonio
    "I don’t know about you, but I worry more about the implications of China’s rise and Russian misbehavior"

    I stopped reading here.

    If you stop reading something then you are a case of arrested development. Which is what the Deep State wants.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Antonio
    Huh??? I highly doubt the deep state wants me to stop reading their propaganda.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Felix Keverich
    Irrelevant. I wasn't making a comment on the commercial viability of LNG exports from the US. I said that the price of this exported gas will always be greater than the price of gas in the US.

    To be sure American companies, under certain conditions, will export LNG at a loss. Even then the price of this gas must account for liquefaction and transportation costs.

    Simply put:

    Price of exported LNG = price of gas on the domestic market + liquefaction and transportation costs
    (those include the cost of electricity for the plants, fuel for the tankers, wages - they remain substantial even after infrustructure is build).

    ^This equation will always hold in a market economy.


    Russia’s policy of subsidizing former Soviet republics with cheap gas and open markets in exchange for neutral (not even friendly!) foreign policies seemed quite reasonable, yet here we are.
     
    It was a stupid policy and Russia deserved to be punished for disregarding the rules of the market economy.

    They’ll be lower than the cost of LNG.

    They will not be lower than the cost of gas compared to other major producing countries such as Canada, Russia, Qatar, etc.

    This has already happened in Australia in fact.

    http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/gas-cartel-is-pushing-gas-prices-up-in-australia/news-story/61acc1864d54fb6eb4801c332e683fbd

    And it appears that in parts of Australia gas is somehow now more expensive than LNG in Japan.

    Between 2006 and 2015, increases to residential gas prices ranged from 23 per cent in Victoria, to 74 per cent in Tasmania.

    Industrial users saw price increases ranging from 16 per cent in Tasmania to 113 per cent in North West Queensland.
    [...]
    Much of the blame for high gas prices has been linked to increased demand after three export terminals were built in Gladstone that enabled companies to ship gas overseas for the first time, combined with a low oil price that has discouraged gas exploration, as well as restrictions on gas exploration and development in states.

    The United States should strictly limit its gas exports and ban the building of any new thermal fossil fuel electric powerstations in order to keep domestic gas prices as low as possible.

    Of course, this will require rounding up atomophobes and herding them into concentration camps. The trout fishermen who don’t understand the concept of “fish ladders” in dams also require reeducation. But these things are already 100% necessary.

    Coal should continue to be used at existing powerstations for economic reasons, but no new ones should be constructed. Export infrastructure to deliver coal to Asia must be built. Currently this is being held up by environmentalist criminals in Washington state for “water use” reasons. These people need to be rounded up and shot.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Felix Keverich

    They’ll be lower than the cost of LNG.

    They will not be lower than the cost of gas compared to other major producing countries such as Canada, Russia, Qatar, etc.

     

    You forgot about Iran. Iran has massive natural gas production, but can't export due to sanctions, so gas in Iran is practically free. You want America to be more like Iran?

    Obviously, allowing more exports will raise the prices on the domestic market. But I can guarantee they will still be much lower than prices in SE Asia, where US will export.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Avery
    {There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia }

    How do you know this?
    Where did you get that number from?

    It was 3 million – two years ago.

    https://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2528568

    By now the figure will be over 3 million, into the customs union.

    https://regnum.ru/news/2316978.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • The military is being misused on Israels wars in the ME and elsewhere in the close to 800 bases around the world and Afghanistan where its job is to protect the CIA and MOSSAD and MI6 poppy fields.

    The military should be brought home and placed on the southern border and stop the national suicide by illegal and unlimted immigration and end this zionist NWO bullshit that is destroying America.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel –

    Isruel would not exist without the USA and the fact that they have 100 nukes, the Samson option.

    Targeted assassinations, the Jews do it, the anti Zionist movement should do it also. Oye vey do I have a list. (Grin) Surprisingly many are shabbos goys.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Vojkan
    Israel can exist without the USA. Nukes are a pretty good life insurance. How it would fare without US taxpayers' money is another matter. You should bear in mind though that Jews rule the banks, the media, the entertainment, the justice, and the education in the whole Western world, not only in the US.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @The Alarmist

    "By common consent, the United States today has the world’s best military. By some estimates, it may be the best in recorded history."
     
    Maybe for today, but for recorded history, the nod goes clearly to the Romans, who knew how to fight and conquer like Romans. We're just getting to our end-game via cheap imported labour and general societal decadence a bit faster than they.

    [Bacevich: ... best military evah ... ] Maybe for today, but for recorded history, the nod goes clearly to the Romans, who knew how to fight and conquer like Romans.

    The Roman armies are a good example, as are Ramses’ Egyptians, Cambyses’ Persians, Pausanias’ and Lysander’s Spartans, Epaminondas’ Thebans, Alexander’s Macedonians, Genghis’ Mongols, Peter the Great Russians, Napoleon’s French, Frederick’s and von Moltke’s Prussians … I could go on all day. Sure the US forces are the strongest right now, but within history, they are nothing special. In terms of bang for the buck, they are utterly pathetic, one reason being of course that the arms development and procurement agenda has been totally hijacked by corporate interests.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Steve Gittelson

    Let me guess: you are a recent college graduate, a dysphoric and overmedicated Brooklyn barista, probably grossly out of shape.
     
    LOL. No, Val, I am an old, over-educated, widely-experienced, former corporate VP of Technology, and one mean and rascally son of a bitch. I undergradded in Philosophy, so I know the difference between morality at the individual level, and morality at the societal level. Worse yet, I know ethics and ethical systems.

    You do not, and it is quite obvious.

    I know ethics and ethical systems

    As a former Corporate VP, I’m sure you do. You know Ethics & Ethical Systems are for Suckers. Right? Riiiiight.

    I also served my time in the Corporate C-Suites, and Ethics are tantamount to Curtains and/or Shades. Espousing Ethics is enough to conceal the Looting & Backstabbing that takes place behind The Words that serve as Curtains.

    Read More
    • Agree: ValmMond
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Seamus Day

    I have more than you have, a man who lived in NYC and saw it happen.
     
    A friend of my mom’s who lives in Arlington, VA, called right after the news from the WTC was breaking, and smoke was coming from what the news thought was from the Capitol, and she was crying and told my mom that see just saw a plane fly into the Pentagon. I was there when my mom took the call.

    A friend of my mom’s who lives in Arlington, VA, called

    Really? Wow. Out of curiosity, did this friend have a name?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Anon
    in the post-Cold War era when the relative strength of U.S. forces reached its zenith, our well-endowed, well-trained, well-equipped, and highly disciplined troops have proven unable to accomplish any of the core tasks to which they’ve been assigned. This has been especially true since 9/11.

    But this is false. US has militarily succeeded around the world in invasions and winning wars.
    But the military cannot build new systems. Its purpose is to destroy. Military can invade, military can bomb, military can kill. But it was not designed to heal and build. Sure, there are military engineers that are into logistics and etc. but military isn't meant to build anything permanent.

    So, US military fulfills its missions all over the world. It drops bombs, invades, kills people, and etc.
    It is very successful at all that. Now, if the US were to return after the battles or wars, no problem.
    But the US plan is to STAY,and that's where the problem comes in. The problem is not with the US military. It is with the post-military strategy, for which the military is ill-equipped to handle. It's not the military that is deciding to stay forever.

    Consider a doctor. A doctor can cut flesh and do stuff inside the body, BUT he cannot heal the patient. He can only set things right(like broken bones) or remove organs. Once he stitches the patient and removes his invasive presence from the organs of the patient, the healing must happen internally by the body itself. A doctor can only set bones together. For the bones to heal, an organic process must take place independent of the doctor. A doctor an remove an object from the body. But the healing has to be happen by natural processes of the body. So, a doctor can cut open a patient and invasively do stuff inside the body. But once his job is finished, he must stitch up the flesh and let the body heal itself.

    US military is the same way. It can invade and take out 'bad guys', but then, it must move out and allow the nation to heal and reorder itself by its own accord. But the US keeps the wound open. The surgery never ends. So, the body cannot heal by its own accord.

    Worse, US targets the wrong 'patients' for sickness. US relies on the Zionist quack to decide which nations are sick and need to be operated on. Obviously, the quack Zionist never says anything is wrong with Israel. Oh no. The sick puppies are Iran, Syria, Libya, Iraq, etc. or any nation hated by Jews.
    But, as the saying goes, "don't fix what isn't broken". It was US foreign policy and war-making that made those nations even worse. Also, the US intervention can make things much worse by removing the regulator. Assad's regime was the regulator that kept the balance of power and order in Syria. But US interferes and undermines the regulator and all hell breaks loose. It's like cutting upon a body and messing with the functioning of the heart or liver. The whole system begins to fall apart. US strategists and big thinkers are quacks or third-rate medical scientists. What they often identify as the disease turns out to be the crucial organ holding the nation together. Gaddafi's regime looked gross and sick(and it was), but despite its grotesqueness, it was the key organ/regulator that held the nation together. Imagine a doctor cutting open someone and taking out intestines as being 'full of shit'. So, will the patient be better since the shit-filled organ has been removed from the body? Of course not. As ugly as intestines are, they are crucial. And Gaddafi's regime was crucial in a desert nation of so many clans. And Assad is the necessary organ of Syria. Of course, the evil Zionist doctor knows this. But it calls for removal of or harm done to the organ because it wants to see a permanently crippled and sick Syria.

    Another thing. Bacevitch is wrong to focus on the military. I can understand why because he's a military historian.

    But the real power is not with the military. After all, if the US were all about military power and ambitions, then war with ANY nation will do for US aggression and foreign ventures. US could make a case that Israel is a rogue state that occupies West Bank, stole Golan Heights, kills Gazans, and spies on the US.
    Or US can cook up any excuse to go to war with Venezuela, Bolivia, black Africa, and etc. There are plenty of cruddy nations.
    But notice that the US military only barks and bites at nations hated by Jews.

    So, Jews have the power over the military because military is under civilian authority that has been bought up by or manned with Jewish power.

    There was some human rights fuss about something in Burma... Why isn't the US military moving over there?
    Mexico has tons of drug lords who commit murder and sell drugs to the US. Why isn't US waging on Mexico?

    All the US wars and aggressions are against nations hated by Jews.

    So, while the Military Industrial Complex may enjoy saber-rattling and wars, it has no agency and autonomy. Its enemies must be chosen by The Power. It's like dogs like to hunt, but the master gets to choose what animal shall be hunted: rabbits, foxes, pigs, deer, etc.

    Hello Priss.

    I don’t know about the win rate. Sure, there were the invasions of Grenada and Panama.

    Maybe Nicaragua, but that was not a war, just massive malicious interference. They even had Russell Means, famous as an American Indian activist in the NAM, among other things, workimg there as an agent. Wonder how effective he was?

    Gulf War I, sure killed many Iraqi soldiers and destroyed much materiel, Also ‘liberated’ that strange construct, Kuwait, back to despotism under its so-called royal family. Sure, liberated the exploitation of oil in Kuwait’s EEZ.

    Cold War? Indeed a victory, but only through the placement and manipulation of traitors in the USSR (many from your fave ethnicity), not a military victory. The true and full story of that is yet to be told, and I am doubting that it ever will.

    As one of your several fans on this site, I am curious about why you always are posting as Anonymous now, even when, as in this post of yours, the content is not very controversial.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    But people are not usually going to Georgia for the beach

    I have never yet been on holiday to the region (so you better read g2k).

    I'm sure I'll write a lot of reviews in tripadvisor when I go eventually.

    But all three of these destinations (Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan), get extremely good reviews with tourists, and it is the new fashion to go on holiday there.

    My parents went on holiday in Baku last year and they sounded very happy about the holiday.

    1. Armenia has actually done quite well, I think. Considering it’s surrounded by hostile states on two sides, and has to spend a lot of $$$ on the military, this is all the more impressive.

    2. Another factor driving Georgian tourism is that it’s really prestigious among the Moscow yuppie hipster crowd. For instance, one acquaintance of mine – half-Jewish, MacBook toting “creative” person – is going there to get married this weekend. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has this sort of “soft power” among the spending classes.

    3. The Caucasus isn’t anywhere near the top of my to go list (that’s reserved for China, India, and a bunch of Mediterranean and ME places, inc. Israel and Iran). However, if I was to go there, I’d go to Armenia or Azerbaijan before Georgia. Armenia has a more impressive history, while Baku is the biggest city in the region and people say good things about it. Last draw is Georgian cuisine, but I am of the opinion that it’s grossly overrated.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thorfinnsson


    2. Another factor driving Georgian tourism is that it’s really prestigious among the Moscow yuppie hipster crowd. For instance, one acquaintance of mine – half-Jewish, MacBook toting “creative” person – is going there to get married this weekend. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan has this sort of “soft power” among the spending classes.
     
    Why?

    Legacy of its cuisine reputation in the USSR?

    Saakashvili?

    Georgia to me is another irrelevant joke. Of course I'm not Russian.
    , @Dmitry
    I’m not sure how to read the graph – i.e. I’m not sure what is the y axis showing?

    About the general economic situation.

    http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=15&pr.y=6&sy=1999&ey=2016&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=911%2C912%2C922%2C915%2C186%2C926&s=NGDPD%2CPPPGDP%2CNGDPDPC%2CPPPPC%2CLP%2CGGXWDG_NGDP&grp=0&a=

    I looked at the countries in the IMF database – I’m not sure how negatively to interpret their situation overall? I think of all the economies, it is the one I would like the least after Ukraine (the three - Armenia, Georgia, Ukraine - with negative population growth).
    , @Dmitry

    3. The Caucasus isn’t anywhere near the top of my to go list (that’s reserved for China, India, and a bunch of Mediterranean and ME places, inc. Israel and Iran). However, if I was to go there, I’d go to Armenia or Azerbaijan before Georgia. Armenia has a more impressive history, while Baku is the biggest city in the region and people say good things about it. Last draw is Georgian cuisine, but I am of the opinion that it’s grossly overrated.
     
    Sure - I feel the same. I'm much more excited to think about visiting places like Cuba or Argentina. But Tbilisi or Baku are a cheap 'weekend', it is not comparable to more expensive holidays.

    Iran will be interesting with the visa-restriction going to be removed soon - but presumably the kind of place it would be easier to visit in a tour-group.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Meimou
    Bingo. Expect the MSM to put a spotlight on this, or at least snopes or trash sites like The Daily Beast.

    I wonder if the Ong family will sue Alex Jones too.

    I wonder if the Ong family will sue Alex Jones too.

    That might be easier than getting the Saudi’s to cough up. How come The Trumpster hasn’t pushed for Justice for The 9/11 Victims’ Families? Obama didn’t either. Funny, that. Except it’s not.

    The Saudi Elephant In The Room

    There’s a reason The American Establishment is doing everything it can to prevent a Civil Lawsuit against Saudi Arabia. If such a suit went forward, it would Spill The Beans, and we can’t have that, can we? Civil Lawsuits are much more lenient when it comes to evidence you can submit and the possibility exists that some of what we’re discussing here will become a part of the Official Record. Perhaps the Saudis, rather than taking it on the Chin for The Gipper and paying, in their defense they expose The Truth about 9/11, or at least the component of The Truth that makes them look rather innocent compared to the Predominate Perpetrators/Predators.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Great comment as always, but a nitpick related to one I made earlier re. 1984 analogies. The proles, despite their coarseness and ignorance, are the only subjects in Oceania that retain some basic form of humanity. They do not think, of course, but they never did (that’s why they’re proles). They are what they are, and to some extent we all have our baser concerns.

    In contrast, it is the Outer Party members who have willingly surrendered critical thought and in most cases gleefully embrace their servitude. Winston Smith is an exception, but his malignantly stupid neighbor Parsons (who welcomes his eventual arrest due to his informant daughter) is the exemplar. We see Parsons in real life here, in the form of gatekeepers, concern trolls, and other assorted cucks warning us away from drawing conclusions (logical and empirical).

    Good insight as usual. The proles, who do not think much, at least exercise objective faculties of memory and common sense at a very day to day, moment to moment level. Since they do not think much, there was no need to indoctrinate them. The old guy that Winston ran into in the pub is a good example. Not much of an historian but he still could remember when a pint was a pint.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Seamus Day

    A conservative Scottish pastor at a Baptist Church I visited, credibly summed up the purpose of war, more accurately than Augustine:

    “The purpose of war is to take what belongs to someone else.”
     

    Bullshit. The cost of most of our recent wars is orders of magnitude more than could ever be taken from these countries. That’s why the ‘war for oil’ slogan of the left is so stupid. We spent trillions in Iraq. You don’t spend trillions for oil.

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.

    I doubt we prols and peasants will ever know the “purpose” of wars. From my perch, the vast majority of them are waged by simple-minded nutcases to satisfy some entirely unfathomable ( to us semi- “normies”, anyway) lust for domination or who knows what. They seem to be the biological adult behavior equivalents for kids torturing cats.

    It seems to me utterly crackpot behavior that can never be satisfactorily understood by mere mortals.

    I could be wrong, however.

    Read More
    • Agree: Che Guava
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Art Deco
    But Maidanism is more of a religious phenomenon, so no firm predictions can be made.

    No, they just don't like you. Get over it.

    It would be pretty strange for Armenians to not like their only guarantor against Azeri designs on their territory, and their only friend in the region apart from Iran.

    (Though as Felix correctly points out, not exactly something that would bother Russians, since Armenia benefits from the relationship far more).

    But it’s not strange, because you are making things up, as you are regrettably wont to. In reality, Armenia is one of the few countries where Putin is even more popular than in Russia itself.

    Read More
    • Replies: @neutral
    What is interesting about that map is how the world community thinks about things vs the "world community" (i.e. all the puppets of the US that the media declares to be the world).

    With India and China you already have a big chunk of the world population, assuming that the rest of Africa leans like Nigeria and Congo, then you have the bulk of world actually being pro and not anti, contradicting the narrative of the cuckservative and SJW media.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Uebersetzer
    Magic armour-piercing rounds do not typically weigh 130 tons or whatever the weight of airliners on 9-11 was. Airliners flying into high towers is a sufficiently rare phenomenon that it may be difficult to be polemical about what would or would not happen, but I don't think the building would remain pristine.

    Of course the building would not remain pristine. In fact, I would imagine had the buildings not collapsed, they would have been condemned, and much to Silverstein’s Chagrin, the Insurance Payout would have been much less and an inadequate Return on Investment. Instead, he made out like a Bandit.

    Understand the Buildings’ Design. The strength of the buildings emanated from their Cores, or at least the strength of The Twin Towers. The Jets never affected the Cores. They were shredded into a million pieces before penetrating that far. The most that should have happened is the collpase of several floors around those incredibly strong and secure Cores, but the Cores would have remained intact. The fact that the Cores fell concomintantly with the not-so-strong Perimeter Space is anomalous and unexpected and has not been explained adequately.

    Here’s the base of one of the Beams comprising the Core. It’s sheered and there is cooled Molten Metal showing. Since the building fell pretty much straight down in its footprint, this Column Beam would not have been sheered like this and there is no reason for the Molten Metal. Unless.

    Look Mom, No Hands!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @The Alarmist

    "By common consent, the United States today has the world’s best military. By some estimates, it may be the best in recorded history."
     
    Maybe for today, but for recorded history, the nod goes clearly to the Romans, who knew how to fight and conquer like Romans. We're just getting to our end-game via cheap imported labour and general societal decadence a bit faster than they.

    Most expensive does not equal best.

    Read More
    • Agree: Mike P
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I have never ruled out the possibility that Russia is responsible for the attack in Salisbury, amongst other possibilities. But I do rule out the possibility that Assad is dropping chemical weapons in Ghouta. In this extraordinary war, where Saudi-funded jihadist head choppers have Israeli air support and US and UK military “advisers”, every time...
  • @RobinG
    Some good news on the home front.
    Yesterday, 30 pro-Palestinian-rights Jewish Americans with If Not Now demanded that Sen. Cardin condemn Israel's violence toward peacefully protesting Gazans.
    The way out of this doomsday spiral is that Israel fairly peacefully implodes, a la USSR.
    It could happen. 2021.

    https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/jewish-activists-storm-senator-s-office-as-lawmakers-sound-off-on-gaza-1.6008583
    Jewish Activists Storm Senator's Office as Lawmakers Sound Off on Israel's Conduct at Gaza Border

    The movie “Exodus” would receive a chilly reception if produced today,

    Arab terrorism was a ghastly mistake and yielded only considerable sympathy for Israel.

    But now that good will has evaporated and only fear of personal, economic, or political retribution controls.

    Now there is much clarity on AIPAC, SPLC, BB, ADL, AJC, HIAS, the Adelson Primary, the JDL, the Liberty, Pollard, Barbara the Spiller of the Beans, Soros, sayonim, neocons, Jewish representation in Bolshevism and radical leftist causes, media concentration and ownership, endless demonization of Nazis, dual citizenship, Jewish manipulation over The Holocaust but complete and utter silence about the Other Holocausts, destruction of basic rights in the name of fighting “anti-Semitism,” inordinate worldwide political and economic control, immigration fanaticism (remember 1965!), Gelbaum and the Sierra Club, the Frankfurt School, the content of the Talmud, supremacism, Rabbi Schneerson quotes, in-group loyalty, Ashkenazis, the Yinon Plan, monoethnic Israel but diversity for the goyim, the Sampson Option, aggressive war in Syria, the astronomical worldwide political distortions of Zionism, billions in aid to Israel for what exactly, fairy tales about Israel as our BFF in the ME, and now outrageous killing of demonstrators in Gaza with hogwash about mortal threats to the border.

    For the truth about Zionism as a non-Jewish phenomenon the thinking of some religious Jews is amazing. Intelligence and astonishing good sense.

    The long and the short of Israel is that the British promised Zionists land that was not theirs to dispose of to solve a problem the owners thereof did not create. Zionistas think some vaporous title to Israel is theirs because some completely different guys lived there 2,000 years ago and then moved or got absorbed somewhere. They have established this patent nonsense by force of arms and maintain it by force of arms. Thus they enjoy sovereignty for the moment but they are kidding themselves if “Live by the sword, die by the sword” doesn’t apply to them. Is there any good will left?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • YEREVAN, April 23. /TASS/. Armenia’s newly elected Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan has tendered resignation after six days in office.

    He came out with a statement to this effect on Monday.

    http://tass.com/world/1001285

    What next?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Introduction President Trump cancelled his attendance at the Summit of the Americas meeting of all the 35 presidents of the region designed to debate and formulate a common policy. Trump delegated Vice President Michael Pence in his place. VP Pence a known nonentity with zero experience and even less knowledge of Latin America – US...
  • Can you write a movie script out of that? Something along the lines of La Dictadura Perfecta?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @padre
    So,the purpose of killing is life?

    The definition of being alive is consuming.
    It is easier to steal than to produce
    So, the purpose of life is stealing; the concomitant killing is unavoidable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Errata:

    “War is evil/wrong/stupid/.” No, war is criminal. See Rome Statute Articles 8 bis, 15 bis and 15 ter, which restate universal jurisdiction law for an independent jurisdiction. Use of force in manifest breach of the UN Charter is the gravest crime.

    “Now, the nation that has created this military system is not some ‘shithole country.’” Yes it is. For your convenience OHCHR has compiled a handy comparative shithole map that clearly shows that your country is the biggest, most bouyant turd in the underdevelopment shithole, bobbing and reeking with Myanmar, Arab headchoppers, and a few atavistic African presidents-for-life. The big picture is apt to trigger indoctrinated reactions of dismissal, but you can drill down and examine the exhaustive supporting documentation compiled by independent experts and domestic civil society.

    http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Indicators/Pages/HRIndicatorsIndex.aspx

    “We need a military system that accurately prioritizes actual and emerging threats.” No we don’t. The US government’s fixation on threats is how the military metastasizes. Furthermore, we don’t need a military system at all. Costa Rica does just fine without one, and they’re a softer target than the US.

    “The root cause of our predicament is the all-volunteer force.” So, you’re going to fix our criminal-aggression ‘predicament’ by forcing every adult to fight with criminal penalties for non-compliance? This is how cognitive dissidence causes rational people to stop following their logical nose and veer off into idiocy.

    So now that we’ve cleared away the cruft of residual state indoctrination with which Bacevich is valiantly struggling, we can talk turkey. The solution is simple. We need a law ‘n order president. The law and order the president enforces is to include UN Charter articles 2(4) and 51, ICCPR Article 20, and A/RES/25/2625. We had a president like that, JFK, but CIA shot him. Our next law ‘n order president must first do what Jack Kennedy wanted to do, until CIA murdered him: break CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds. That is a regime change. So any future law ‘n order president will by necessity be appointed by the victors of the last war our fatass loser military loses. The victors will impose command responsibility for US aggression (that in itself will decimate CIA and the flag ranks.) The victors will end CIA’s COG state-of-emergency regime and replace this obsolete dead-letter constitution with the UN Charter, the core human rights instruments, the International Bill of Human Rights, and the Rome Statute.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    LOL this guy wants us to treat the OHCHR seriously. I bet he thinks the Canadian CHRC is also a legitimate body we should all defer to.

    "we can talk turkey." OK let's. Your irrelevant and (frankly insulting to our intelligence) commentary spoken as some UN plutocrat treating the US and Haiti as equal with equal standards is about as dumb as the gentleman above who wants us to think "half the US population has hispanic roots" or that we never "USA diversity never made room for the native americans".

    Your slimy globalism is showing, Pooftareader, no matter how many times you try to use expressions like "Arab headchoppers" to try, in your wormy manner, to fit in with how you think dissident nationalists talk.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    in the post-Cold War era when the relative strength of U.S. forces reached its zenith, our well-endowed, well-trained, well-equipped, and highly disciplined troops have proven unable to accomplish any of the core tasks to which they’ve been assigned. This has been especially true since 9/11.

    But this is false. US has militarily succeeded around the world in invasions and winning wars.
    But the military cannot build new systems. Its purpose is to destroy. Military can invade, military can bomb, military can kill. But it was not designed to heal and build. Sure, there are military engineers that are into logistics and etc. but military isn't meant to build anything permanent.

    So, US military fulfills its missions all over the world. It drops bombs, invades, kills people, and etc.
    It is very successful at all that. Now, if the US were to return after the battles or wars, no problem.
    But the US plan is to STAY,and that's where the problem comes in. The problem is not with the US military. It is with the post-military strategy, for which the military is ill-equipped to handle. It's not the military that is deciding to stay forever.

    Consider a doctor. A doctor can cut flesh and do stuff inside the body, BUT he cannot heal the patient. He can only set things right(like broken bones) or remove organs. Once he stitches the patient and removes his invasive presence from the organs of the patient, the healing must happen internally by the body itself. A doctor can only set bones together. For the bones to heal, an organic process must take place independent of the doctor. A doctor an remove an object from the body. But the healing has to be happen by natural processes of the body. So, a doctor can cut open a patient and invasively do stuff inside the body. But once his job is finished, he must stitch up the flesh and let the body heal itself.

    US military is the same way. It can invade and take out 'bad guys', but then, it must move out and allow the nation to heal and reorder itself by its own accord. But the US keeps the wound open. The surgery never ends. So, the body cannot heal by its own accord.

    Worse, US targets the wrong 'patients' for sickness. US relies on the Zionist quack to decide which nations are sick and need to be operated on. Obviously, the quack Zionist never says anything is wrong with Israel. Oh no. The sick puppies are Iran, Syria, Libya, Iraq, etc. or any nation hated by Jews.
    But, as the saying goes, "don't fix what isn't broken". It was US foreign policy and war-making that made those nations even worse. Also, the US intervention can make things much worse by removing the regulator. Assad's regime was the regulator that kept the balance of power and order in Syria. But US interferes and undermines the regulator and all hell breaks loose. It's like cutting upon a body and messing with the functioning of the heart or liver. The whole system begins to fall apart. US strategists and big thinkers are quacks or third-rate medical scientists. What they often identify as the disease turns out to be the crucial organ holding the nation together. Gaddafi's regime looked gross and sick(and it was), but despite its grotesqueness, it was the key organ/regulator that held the nation together. Imagine a doctor cutting open someone and taking out intestines as being 'full of shit'. So, will the patient be better since the shit-filled organ has been removed from the body? Of course not. As ugly as intestines are, they are crucial. And Gaddafi's regime was crucial in a desert nation of so many clans. And Assad is the necessary organ of Syria. Of course, the evil Zionist doctor knows this. But it calls for removal of or harm done to the organ because it wants to see a permanently crippled and sick Syria.

    Another thing. Bacevitch is wrong to focus on the military. I can understand why because he's a military historian.

    But the real power is not with the military. After all, if the US were all about military power and ambitions, then war with ANY nation will do for US aggression and foreign ventures. US could make a case that Israel is a rogue state that occupies West Bank, stole Golan Heights, kills Gazans, and spies on the US.
    Or US can cook up any excuse to go to war with Venezuela, Bolivia, black Africa, and etc. There are plenty of cruddy nations.
    But notice that the US military only barks and bites at nations hated by Jews.

    So, Jews have the power over the military because military is under civilian authority that has been bought up by or manned with Jewish power.

    There was some human rights fuss about something in Burma... Why isn't the US military moving over there?
    Mexico has tons of drug lords who commit murder and sell drugs to the US. Why isn't US waging on Mexico?

    All the US wars and aggressions are against nations hated by Jews.

    So, while the Military Industrial Complex may enjoy saber-rattling and wars, it has no agency and autonomy. Its enemies must be chosen by The Power. It's like dogs like to hunt, but the master gets to choose what animal shall be hunted: rabbits, foxes, pigs, deer, etc.

    The problem is not with the US military. It is with the post-military strategy, for which the military is ill-equipped to handle. It’s not the military that is deciding to stay forever.

    The failure to rebuild functioning nation states and the “need” for continuous occupation are not bugs but features. The ongoing occupation of Afghanistan has nothing to do with “fighting terror” or “spreading democracy and freedom” – it is to encircle Iran and preventing it from linking up with China. Afghanistan cannot be allowed to make its own decisions in this matter, so it must endure the occupation.

    Read More
    • Agree: Zumbuddi
    • Replies: @Seamus Day

    Former Afghan President Hamid Karzai believes Russia can play a decisive role in ending America’s longest war

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-28/ex-afghan-leader-karzai-sees-russia-as-key-to-peace-with-taliban

     

    With talk like this I’m sure the Western “intel” agencies are plotting to take Karzai out and replace him with another puppet.
    , @chris
    Excellent point, Mike!

    It's all about keeping every country in check and scared so no one here or there ever starts to ask: 'what the hell are we doing ?' and 'what have we done ?'
    , @Wally
    "it is to encircle Iran and preventing it from linking up with China."

    Yet Iran is linking up with China, big time.

    https://thediplomat.com/2016/11/iran-china-sign-military-cooperation-agreement/

    http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/iran-and-china-are-strengthening-their-military-ties

    https://financialtribune.com/articles/economy-domestic-economy/69312/iran-china-h1-trade-up-31-to-18-billion
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    I have more than you have, a man who lived in NYC and saw it happen.

    I have more than you have, a man who lived in NYC and saw it happen.

    A friend of my mom’s who lives in Arlington, VA, called right after the news from the WTC was breaking, and smoke was coming from what the news thought was from the Capitol, and she was crying and told my mom that see just saw a plane fly into the Pentagon. I was there when my mom took the call.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    A friend of my mom’s who lives in Arlington, VA, called
     
    Really? Wow. Out of curiosity, did this friend have a name?
    , @daniel le mouche
    'and she was crying and told my mom that see just saw a plane fly into the Pentagon. I was there when my mom took the call.'

    And yet, with all the surveillance cameras, probably numbering in the hundreds, pointed right there, no video has been released by the Pentagon or FBI or CIA, for national security reasons. But there is one single linked video, easy to find, which shows an almost lightening-quick flash and what looks like a missile.
    And of course, no seats, engines, dead bodies--ever see footage of a real airplane crash?
    , @NoseytheDuke
    No plane hit the Pentagon, unless you believe in The Incredible Shrinking Plane, one that leaves a much smaller hole than its actual size when it crashes.

    "They shall find it difficult, they who have taken authority as truth rather than truth as authority."

    Gerald Massey.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Mitleser

    Was that a response to my comment?
     
    Yes.

    We seem to have very different views on how EU operates, and in my opinion your views are ridiculous!
     
    Says the guy who denies Europeans agency.

    It was Washington’s idea to block South Stream and Nord Stream.
     
    Why are so certain that it was the case?
    The German government would not back NS II as much as they did if it would not strengthen Germany's role as European gas hub.
    South Stream did not serve this role and was blocked.
    For Poles, it would be beneficially not to reduce Poland's role as transit country, hence they have a legit reason to oppose NS II which avoids Poland.

    It is not always Washington to blame. Europeans countries are perfectly willing to screw each other.
    One of the reasons why Americans are so dominant in Europe is that they can take advantage of that.

    OTOH the Americans were also quite opposed to both Streams. I remember back when in 2008 the then leftist Hungarian PM Gyurcsány had good relations with Putin, and pushed for South Stream, and the Americans were criticizing us for it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Felix Keverich

    OTOH the Americans were also quite opposed to both Streams.
     
    "OTOH"? This isn't really up to a debate. The only side who is interested in stopping these pipelines is the US. The European Comission is simply following orders from the US.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Seamus Day

    A conservative Scottish pastor at a Baptist Church I visited, credibly summed up the purpose of war, more accurately than Augustine:

    “The purpose of war is to take what belongs to someone else.”
     

    Bullshit. The cost of most of our recent wars is orders of magnitude more than could ever be taken from these countries. That’s why the ‘war for oil’ slogan of the left is so stupid. We spent trillions in Iraq. You don’t spend trillions for oil.

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.

    “The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.”

    Seamus, buddy, I can’t disagree . . . I can’t disagree.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The USA has inherited the pirate genes of England , plus the brutal genes of militaristic germans , thats all for ” diversity ” .

    USA ” diversity ” never made room for the native americans , for the hispanic roots of half of the country ……..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Can't tell if this a bad troll or you're just very, very out of your depth at this website?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Uebersetzer
    There was a gigantic, organised slaughter of European Jews in the 1940s. I did research in two apparently unrelated areas to it and curiously enough, Jewish victims of the Nazis are present.
    1. The Good Soldier Svejk by the Czech writer Jaroslav Hasek. A character in the novel is a Cadet Biegler. Many characters were based on real-life characters known to the author. One of them was Hans Bigler.
    http://honsi.org/literature/svejk/?page=11&lang=en#Bigler
    Bigler's father Eduard was killed in Bergen-Belsen in 1944, on account of being Jewish. It is not clear whether Hans Bigler was fully Jewish or part-Jewish although the latter is more likely - half-Jews generally speaking survived the Nazi era although they were despised as Mischlinge. Hans Bigler seems to have attributed his own survival to an Allied air raid on Dresden, where he then lived, destroying Gestapo records.
    2. A Nazi-era (1937) German film called Unternehmen Michael set during the German offensives of 1918. A supporting role in the film was played by the actor Paul Otto. Otto was in fact Jewish but this was not discovered until 1943. When it was discovered, Otto committed suicide with his wife shortly before being deported to the "East".
    If the Holocaust was a hoax, why was Eduard Bigler killed? And why did a respected German actor like Paul Otto opt for suicide when he was discovered to be of Jewish origin and about to be deported to Auschwitz, Treblinka or some such destination?
    https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0653288/?ref_=tt_cl_t2

    Credit is due: I’ve seen some pretty absurd “arguments” from Holo-believers, but this is a whole new level of stupid.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Uebersetzer
    Magic armour-piercing rounds do not typically weigh 130 tons or whatever the weight of airliners on 9-11 was. Airliners flying into high towers is a sufficiently rare phenomenon that it may be difficult to be polemical about what would or would not happen, but I don't think the building would remain pristine.

    And the buildings weighted 500K tons. No “rare event” speciousness is necessary to understand what should (think bug and windshield).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Yazidis, who were recently the target of massacre, rape and sex slavery by Isis, are now facing forcible conversion to Islam under the threat of death from Turkish-backed forces which captured the Kurdish enclave of Afrin on 18 March. Islamist rebel fighters, who are allied to Turkey and have occupied Yazidi villages in the...
  • Same old, same old story Islam is violent blood drenched nightmare. Every other religion has experienced their tender loving mercy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • Out of its 239 years of existence the US has been at war for 222 years ( 93 % if its existence ) .

    https://freakonometrics.hypotheses.org/50473

    The USA does 50% of the military expenses of the world , the USA has some 800-1000 military bases out of the country . USA population 310 million , rest of the world 7,200 million

    What else ?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[201] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mark James

    we count on these less affluent Americans to volunteer for military service

     

    Mondoweiss had an interesting piece recently stating that Baptists, Catholics, LDS contribute the highest personnel numbers --percentage wise-- to the Armed Services. While Methodists, Congregationalists, Jews the fewest. Even Muslims have a greater percentage than Jews (surprising...no).

    The point is that in as long as educational benefits, medical care (for life) and a notion of service as a noble calling continue to be valued by a significant portion of the poor/lower middle class, the wealthiest among us will have numbers to project militarily. And it won't be from their families.

    The Deep State/ziocons were very smart to create a deification of the military in the past decades. So the American public would cheer on wars and occupations and endless global military expansion. We went from the grass-roots anti-war invective “Baby killers!” to the Fox News slogan, “Thank you for your service!”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Introduction Political leaders and the mass media deluge the public with a constant stream of frightening incidents caused by the enemy-of-the-week: nerve gas killing dozens of little babies in Syria, Russian-directed poison assassination attempts in England and terror incidents throughout Europe, requiring an increase in domestic police state surveillance and spying. Extensively monitored bank records,...
  • @Isabella
    If you look up the 14 defining characteristics of Fascist states, taken from a comparative analysis of every identified and known Fascist state so far, you will see that [a] America ticks 13 of the 14 boxes, and the unticked is actually open to interpretation, and that [b] one of those 14 is to keep the people in a state of fear, usually by drumming up some imaginary threat i.e. in Germany 1930's it was , "the Jews, The socialists, the communists".

    What America is doing now, is only puzzling if you dont have your view finder set right. Just as, if, scanning the Serengeti, it is set to "near" you can't understand the lion suddenly in front of you because you failed to see where he came from - if you dont have your politico-socio viewfinder set to "Fascist" you might be puzzled by things America is doing. Just re-set it, go look again and WoW !! Suddenly it all comes clear.

    Caution to Unz readers: Do not, repeat, do NOT accompany Isabella on a trip to the Serengeti.

    If Isabella’s viewfinder is as accurate as the posted representation of “Fascism,” you may end up gobbled up by the same lion that devoured Germany and Italy in the 1940s.

    First, what’s this “Fourteen Points” checklist? It’s something published by one Lawrence Britt.

    Second, Who is Lawrence Britt?
    Take your pick:

    source: google

    Who was Dr. Lawrence Britt and how is he connected with fascism
    http://www.slader.com/…/who-was-dr-lawrence-britt-and-how-is-he-connected-with-fascism…;
    Lawrence W. Britt is not a doctor in any field but a novelist who compiled fourteen points which he believes define a Fascist regime. He is a novelist, with no formal training in political science or history and so his views on fascism should be viewed objectively and as an opinion rather than as fact or as a definition. He is widely known for using rhetoric to equate the modern Republican party with fascism and his work is largely deemed to be political opinion rather than analysis or study.

    source: google

    Lawrence Britt
    explorepdx.com/britt.html
    Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist, wrote an article about fascism, which appeared in Free Inquiry magazine—a journal of humanist thought. Dr. Britt studied the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile). He found the regimes all had 14 things in …

    source: Lawrence Britt himself, via https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/holocaust-museum-warning-signs-fascism/

    The list was originally created by Laurence Britt in 2003, for an article published by Free Inquiry magazine (a publication for secular humanist commentary and analysis). While subsequent postings of the list often attribute it to “Dr. Laurence Britt,” the author said that he was not actually a doctor (nor did he claim to be). Britt himself said that he could be more accurately described as an amateur historian:

    I’ve read this thread with interest. For your information I never made a claim that I was a “Dr.” Someone on the internet made that ASSUMPTION when they passed on the artice. I am a retired bsunessman with a life long interst in history and current events.
    I have a personal book collection on these subjects of over 3000 volumes. I’ve contributed chapters to three books, written another, and am working on a second. I’ve written aproximately 25 magazine and newespaper articles on political and econmic affairs.

    I spent about 200 hours researching the fascism article building on a lifetime interst in the subject.

    My novel, “June , 2004” was written in 1997 and published in 1998. It was a fictional treatment of a future of fascism in America, which has turned out quite predictive of actual events since it was published.Regards, Larry Britt

    Britt created this list during George W. Bush’s tenure as president of the United States. While he did not actually name Bush, he wrote in the original article that some of the early warning signs had already manifested in the United States . . .”

    The Snopes article is the outcome of fact-checking a claim that the USHolocaust Museum “displayed a poster with the 14 points of fascism . . .”; Snopes learned that someone named Sarah Rose tweeted a photo of a “poster” listing the 14 points; on Jan. 30, 2017, under her photo of the poster, Rose tweeted:

    “In the US Holocaust Museum.
    I’m shook.”

    Sarah Rose, who first shared the photograph on social media, confirmed to us that she took the picture in the museum’s gift shop. We reached out to the USHHM to confirm that it sold a poster showing “early warning signs of fascism,” and they told us that the museum no longer carries the poster. . . .

    In less than an hour, Rose’s photo-tweet wended its way through what is euphemistically called the social media tech- work; on Jan. 30, 2017 “Eboneezer Goode added this text to an enhanced photo of Britt’s 14 points and tweeted:

    @RaRaVibes There are two things he has left to do. It’s time for us to rise up and #resist #oppose and #impeach this monster.

    SO, Third, What are the real threats to the American and all other people? How should we set our “viewfinders?”

    The Number One threat is bigotry and ignorance.

    Lawrence Britt’s list is bigoted and stupid.

    USHMM is a temple to dissemination of disinformation for the purpose of engendering hatred, while simultaneously avoiding accountability. It is the centerpiece of bigotry in the Reception Hall of the US Capitol.
    American taxpayers spend more than $50 million each year on this misguiding “viewfinder.”

    Sarah Rose’s tweet was ignorant.

    Rose’s tweet snowballed into an unhinged ad hominem attack and advocacy for extreme political action.

    Isabella is a useful idiot.

    The fruits of bigotry, ignorance and hate-filled disinformation are death and destruction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @jilles dykstra
    The main thing in this world that frightens me is USA militarism.
    De Gaulle already said 'the USA thinks that force is the solution to any problem'.
    About the best army, in NATO excercises comparing armies the Dutch most of the time won.
    USA commanders never understood how without orders a problem was solved, while USA soldiers were waiting for orders.
    With regard to discipline, the Dutch were the worst.

    The reason that US militarism is so frightening is that like its parent English imperialism it is insatiable and the very definition of self-righteous and features a world class ability to lie and deceive.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    British imperialism was not so frightening.
    Britain was and is a small country, that never had the resources the USA has.
    British colonial wars were small, and not costly in money, except before WWI the Boer War.
    Ian Hernon, 'Britain's Forgotten Wars, Colonial Campaigns of the 19th Century', 2003, 2007, Chalford - Stroud
    Even the Boers, with a few cannon, and just rifles, were a formidable opponent.
    The natives were no match at all for repeater rifles, shrapnel cannon, or battleships.
    The British empire could exist through bluff, manipulation, bribes, diplomacy.
    WWI changed all that.
    Germany was not a bunch of natives with spears and muskets.
    WWII was the end of the British empire, thanks to Churchill:
    John Charmley, ‘Der Untergang des Britischen Empires, Roosevelt – Churchill und Amerikas Weg zur Weltmacht’, Graz 2005
    As far as I know the book just was published as german translation, I suppose no British publisher dared to publish the original by British historian Charmley.
    That Churchill was not a hero, but an undertaker, it cannot be true.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @JL
    This is an oversimplification and Thorfinnsson also wrote "in theory". Once the infrastructure is built (supertankers and LNG plants), the costs are not so immense. Furthermore, even if export prices were to fall, that infrastructure represents sunken costs which need to be recouped, even if that means operating at a loss.

    This was seen with the shale oil industry in the US. Lifting costs, before 2014, were around $80/barrel. But they mostly kept on pumping even with the price at half that because their creditors would rather see $0.50 on the dollar returned than zero. Technology and adjustments down the services chain have reduced costs on shale oil, but they're still not very far from break even.

    Irrelevant. I wasn’t making a comment on the commercial viability of LNG exports from the US. I said that the price of this exported gas will always be greater than the price of gas in the US.

    To be sure American companies, under certain conditions, will export LNG at a loss. Even then the price of this gas must account for liquefaction and transportation costs.

    Simply put:

    Price of exported LNG = price of gas on the domestic market + liquefaction and transportation costs
    (those include the cost of electricity for the plants, fuel for the tankers, wages – they remain substantial even after infrustructure is build).

    ^This equation will always hold in a market economy.

    Russia’s policy of subsidizing former Soviet republics with cheap gas and open markets in exchange for neutral (not even friendly!) foreign policies seemed quite reasonable, yet here we are.

    It was a stupid policy and Russia deserved to be punished for disregarding the rules of the market economy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thorfinnsson
    They'll be lower than the cost of LNG.

    They will not be lower than the cost of gas compared to other major producing countries such as Canada, Russia, Qatar, etc.

    This has already happened in Australia in fact.

    http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/gas-cartel-is-pushing-gas-prices-up-in-australia/news-story/61acc1864d54fb6eb4801c332e683fbd

    And it appears that in parts of Australia gas is somehow now more expensive than LNG in Japan.

    Between 2006 and 2015, increases to residential gas prices ranged from 23 per cent in Victoria, to 74 per cent in Tasmania.

    Industrial users saw price increases ranging from 16 per cent in Tasmania to 113 per cent in North West Queensland.
    [...]
    Much of the blame for high gas prices has been linked to increased demand after three export terminals were built in Gladstone that enabled companies to ship gas overseas for the first time, combined with a low oil price that has discouraged gas exploration, as well as restrictions on gas exploration and development in states.
     

    The United States should strictly limit its gas exports and ban the building of any new thermal fossil fuel electric powerstations in order to keep domestic gas prices as low as possible.

    Of course, this will require rounding up atomophobes and herding them into concentration camps. The trout fishermen who don't understand the concept of "fish ladders" in dams also require reeducation. But these things are already 100% necessary.

    Coal should continue to be used at existing powerstations for economic reasons, but no new ones should be constructed. Export infrastructure to deliver coal to Asia must be built. Currently this is being held up by environmentalist criminals in Washington state for "water use" reasons. These people need to be rounded up and shot.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    Everything that I’ve read here sourced to TomDispatch sounds like something one might hear on NPR. If “Andrew J. Bacevich is trying to write a book about how we got Trump,” then he might do well to look in the mirror.

    My best guess after reading this column is that he wants Uncle Sam to conscript my kids to

    - keep China from “rising”

    - be stationed in eastern Poland to glare across the border at “petulant and over-armed Russia”

    - wage a Great War On Climate Change

    But why? Notice the pronoun propaganda worthy of Pat Buchanan:

    “The root cause of our predicament is the all-volunteer force. Only when we ordinary citizens conclude that we have an obligation to contribute to the country’s defense will it become possible to devise a set of principles for raising, organizing, supporting, and employing U.S. forces that align with our professed values and our actual security requirements.”

    Of course, the author would entrust these purported reforms to the Congress, which is going to rein in the Commander-In-Chief like it did back in [******].

    Many of “we ordinary citizens” have come to realize that nothing run from Washington — especially military forces deployed outside “our” country — has much to do “with our professed values and our actual security requirements.” And it never, ever will.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ploni almoni
    The idea is that an army of conscripts, that is, of citizens, may be a little more responsible than an army of unemployed robots. Before there was general conscription the military were a collection of psychopaths. General conscription diluted their preponderance in the armed forces. The use of a lottery to conscript during Vietnam was a device to stop protests.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @gjack
    A "petulant, overarmed Russia" is a "security issue" for the U.S.? It would kind of seem to be the other way around. Colonel, you're well outside the mainstream media here. No need for even a courtesy bow to political correctness.

    A “petulant, overarmed Russia” is a “security issue” for the U.S.? It would kind of seem to be the other way around.

    That’s a real gagger. Glad I didn’t waste time reading the article and instead jumped right to the comments.

    It’s an old trick to blame others for what you’re doing. E.g., the Reds, who openly advocated and agitated for permanent worldwide revolution, blamed the Nazis for wanting to take over the world.

    A couple of other examples,

    “Blame others for your own sins.”
    J. V. Stalin, Anarchism Or Socialism ? December, 1906 — January, 1907

    Romans 2:1 You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge another, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    It's interesting that the Soviets had a universal political ideology pretty much requiring world conquest/revolution, while the Nazis did not, yet the Nazis were successfully manipulated (or manipulated themselves, I don't know which) into invading most of their neighbors. The Soviets did that too but got away with it* by hiding behind the Nazi conquests at the same time.

    *The Russian nation paid very heavily, though.

    Note: This comment form was autofilled with "Ron Unz" as commenter handle. That's a mistake, I think?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Fran Macadam
    A conservative Scottish pastor at a Baptist Church I visited, credibly summed up the purpose of war, more accurately than Augustine:

    "The purpose of war is to take what belongs to someone else."

    A conservative Scottish pastor at a Baptist Church I visited, credibly summed up the purpose of war, more accurately than Augustine:

    “The purpose of war is to take what belongs to someone else.”

    Bullshit. The cost of most of our recent wars is orders of magnitude more than could ever be taken from these countries. That’s why the ‘war for oil’ slogan of the left is so stupid. We spent trillions in Iraq. You don’t spend trillions for oil.

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JackOH
    "The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom."

    Seamus, buddy, I can't disagree . . . I can't disagree.
    , @jacques sheete

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.
     
    I doubt we prols and peasants will ever know the "purpose" of wars. From my perch, the vast majority of them are waged by simple-minded nutcases to satisfy some entirely unfathomable ( to us semi- "normies", anyway) lust for domination or who knows what. They seem to be the biological adult behavior equivalents for kids torturing cats.

    It seems to me utterly crackpot behavior that can never be satisfactorily understood by mere mortals.

    I could be wrong, however.

    , @Chris Mallory

    The purpose of our modern wars is to destroy countries and then occupy them to maintain control until a puppet regime of our can be planted and bloom.
     
    In other words "To take their stuff". Why else have a "puppet regime"?
    , @myself
    I peg it as collective American, and by extension collective Western, insanity.

    We're not going to cure ourselves - we should be in the civilization equivalent of a straight-jacket, barring that, maybe we should be put out of our misery.

    And BTW, the older generations to whom I've spoken mostly know what's what. They know in their gut that their societies and their children have no future, and most are banking on being dead when the predictable collapse occurs.

    Yup, the Boomers do not give a shit, and just want to live comfortably and then die. We are now at the end game.

    Give it 20 years, maximum. 20 years - a blink of an eye in historical terms.
    , @The Scalpel
    The biological purpose of war is to kill off ignorant, violent people and those who value themselves so little that they willing to risk their lives follow orders from literally anyone with a dollar in their pocket.
    , @Carroll Price

    We spent trillions in Iraq. You don’t spend trillions for oil.
     
    No, the trillions weren't spent (as in wasted) they were simply diverted from the public to the private sector.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Ronald Thomas West

    "Thucydides’s famed .. “The strong do what they will, while the weak suffer what they must.”"
     
    Well, colonel, in case of Thucydides, I'd go with “Their judgment was based more upon blind wishing than upon any sound pre-vision; for it is a habit of mankind to entrust to careless hope what they long for, and to use sovereign reason to thrust aside what they do not fancy” pointing to human nature hasn't changed one bit, bringing up the more apropos:

    “The extension of the empire has meant the growth of private fortunes. This is nothing new, indeed it is in keeping with the most ancient history” -Gaius Asinius Gallus (from Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome)

    Meanwhile, under the terms of our military system, attention to how this money actually gets spent by our yet-to-be-audited Pentagon tends to be — to put the matter politely — spotty
     
    Just come out and say "Criminal." Or, look at whose books THE PENTAGON is auditing:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/30/usaid-in-central-africa/

    The legal profession exists to implement the rule of law. We hope that the result is some approximation of justice
     
    Colonel, we haven't had a constitution & rule of law since the National Security Act of 1947. What we have is called "color of law." You might wish to study up on that:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/12/01/the-oath-and-the-trash-bin/

    I don’t know about you, but I worry more about the implications of China’s rise and Russian misbehavior than I do about Islamic terrorism. And I worry more about changing weather patterns here in New England or somebody shutting down the electrical grid in my home town than I do about what Beijing and Moscow may be cooking up
     
    That's just oymoronish stupid (typo?) because it's our military and intelligence agencies combined behavior, inclusive of radicalizing Islam and setting it loose in Western China and Russia's Caucus, is no small reason for those rising giants looking at us like we're rabid dogs. BTW if you're really worried about the grid going down, well, you might have a look at EMP:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/10/14/devolution-part-1/

    As for:

    "The generals who followed one another in presiding over that war are undoubtedly estimable, well-intentioned men..."
     
    The colonel is just flat out wrong; and I don't give a rat's a** if I was a mere sergeant and Bacevich was a colonel, because I went on to work in the trenches investigating corruption and the colonel went to the la-la-land of the ivory tower. Here's the real score:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/05/26/counterfeit-coin/

    All in all, the colonel's article is a fail.

    Colonel, we haven’t had a constitution & rule of law since the National Security Act of 1947…

    Some would peg that almost a century prior or even earlier. The war of Northern bankers against Southern planters proved that the anti-federalists were correct in many ways.

    The constitution was a huge link in the chain around our necks.

    Rule of law? When did that ever happen?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Catiline
    Partisan divisions over the military reflect much deeper cultural factors. “From the quasi-war with France [1798-1800] to the Vietnam war,” writes historian David Hackett Fischer, “the two southern cultures strongly supported every American war no matter what it was about or who it was against. Southern ideas of honour and the warrior ethic combined to create regional war fevers of great intensity in 1798, 1812, 1846, 1861, 1898, 1941, 1950 and 1965.” At the same time, the greater New England region has been home to the most intense opposition to American foreign wars-including the second world war. For 50 years, liberal American historians have spoken of “right-wing isolationists” but the fact is that most isolationists in the 1930s were liberals or leftists. Ironically, Roosevelt found the strongest supporters for his anti-Hitler foreign policy among racist Southern conservatives, who hated New Deal liberalism but were eager to save Britain and defeat Germany. The isolationist America First committee was a miserable failure in the south.

    As the southern states have gone Republican in recent years, so has America’s military, in which southern whites have always been over-represented. In November 2000, during the electoral college crisis, Democratic party operatives in the contested state of Florida tried to disqualify, on technical grounds, as many overseas ballots from US military personnel as they could, on the correct assumption that American soldiers are overwhelmingly Republican.

    What explains the deeply-ingrained military ethic of southerners-and the equally intense anti-military sentiments of greater New Englanders? Again, culture is the answer. The New England Puritans frowned on violence as a way of resolving social conflicts. The southern cavalier code, however, endorsed violence when personal or national honour was being “disrespected” or “dissed.” According to the sociologists Richard E Nisbet and Dov Cohen, although white southerners are no more likely than northern whites to kill strangers for money, they are much more likely to kill spouses, lovers, friends, and acquaintances who have insulted them. These differences explain why southern states have higher rates of homicide-and more executions. Most black Americans share southern culture (and the Latin American culture of honour is very similar). When murders committed by blacks and Latinos are not counted, the anthropologist Marvin Harris has observed, “America’s rates of violent crime are much closer to the rates found in Japan.” If southern whites were then subtracted from the murder figures, the US murder rate would be lower still.

    All of this means that the talk in recent years about a supposed “resurgence of right-wing isolationism” is misleading. Many commentators have found themselves confused by the ambitious liberal interventionism of Clinton and Gore and the right-wing isolationism of Patrick Buchanan. But neither Clinton nor Buchanan are typical of their parties. Buchanan has little influence on the Republican right, which has repudiated his isolationism as well as his protectionism. Clinton, like Gore, emerged from the shrinking southern conservative wing of the Democratic party. His southern-style interventionism was supported by many Jewish liberals who want a US forward military presence capable of protecting Israel and who viewed Serbia’s ethnic cleansing in the Balkans as a replay of the Holocaust. But the interventionist sentiments of Jewish liberals are not shared by other groups in the Democratic electoral base, like Yankees, Germanic Americans and blacks.

    This is why Europeans and Asians who believe that the Democrats will be more “internationalist” than the Republicans are mistaken. True, liberal Yankees are more in favour of constructive engagement with international institutions and norms than their southern rivals: compare the support of Clinton and Gore for the Kyoto treaty with George W Bush’s hostility to UN peacekeeping missions. But when the US uses military power-unilaterally or as part of an alliance like Nato-the fiercest opposition always comes from left-wing Democrats. Republicans may not like open-ended peace-keeping operations in the Balkans, but where US and allied security interests are clearly at stake, as in the Persian Gulf or the Taiwan Strait, they are hawks. By contrast, much of the Democratic left denounced Clinton as a war criminal during the Kosovo war. If a Republican president had led the Nato effort in the Balkans, most Democrats in Congress would probably have opposed it, just as most congressional Democrats voted against the Gulf war. Tony Blair may not like their thinking on domestic politics, but if he wants a strong Anglo-American alliance then his natural allies will be found among Anglophile Virginia Republicans, not among pacifist Democrats in Massachusetts or Oregon.

    https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/americastribes
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • @Vojkan
    Neocons would be neocons with or without Israel. The tribal aspect is undisputable, there are overlapping interests, but the goals are different. For neocons, as for Soros progressives who are also far from being all Zionists, it's global domination, for Zionists, it's Greater Israel, which does btw encompass more land than just the mythical Eretz Israel.
    Obviously, the neocons' God complex has a lot to do with being "the chosen people" and obviously their rise to prominence wouldn't have been possible without help from fellow "chosen people" so it's not such a bad idea to root for Israel, but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn't help at all achieve the Zionists' goals. The latter don't put all their eggs in one basket, and they do in fact have a lot of activity in the back of their American protector but if the USA goes down, the neocons / Soros liberals are gone too.
    In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel - though they'd have to find other ways to pominence than Zionist money -, they're both phenomenons of the same tribe but one can be contained and can be made to accomodate itself with that containment, the others represent a real threat to Planet Earth. The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.

    For neocons,… it’s global domination, for Zionists, it’s Greater Israel…

    Global domination for neocons is not an end in itself, it is a means to an end… and that end is the enhancement of the security of the Jewish state.

    … but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn’t help at all achieve the Zionists’ goals.

    Surely, you jest. The neocons like Robert Kaganovitch and his wife Victoria Nudelman, Willian Kristol, David Frum, etc, are obsessed with Russia as Russia is the sponsor of both Iran and Syria, which supply Hezbollah the means by which to keep Israel out of Lebanon.

    In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel

    While the former is true, the latter isn’t.

    The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.

    On this, we both can agree.

    Read More
    • Agree: Z-man
    • Replies: @Vojkan
    If the US and its suppletives take on Russia, Israel becomes fair game. So to take out Russia, neocons would have to sacrify Israel. That's where the Khazars diverge from mainstream Zionism. What's the use of being God's "chosen people" if you don't rule the world but then what's the use of ruling the world if there is no Israel?
    Zionist support of neocon agenda may well terminate their beloved creature's existence in the ME so they should think twice before pushing their US vassal to attack Russia.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Ronald Thomas West

    "Thucydides’s famed .. “The strong do what they will, while the weak suffer what they must.”"
     
    Well, colonel, in case of Thucydides, I'd go with “Their judgment was based more upon blind wishing than upon any sound pre-vision; for it is a habit of mankind to entrust to careless hope what they long for, and to use sovereign reason to thrust aside what they do not fancy” pointing to human nature hasn't changed one bit, bringing up the more apropos:

    “The extension of the empire has meant the growth of private fortunes. This is nothing new, indeed it is in keeping with the most ancient history” -Gaius Asinius Gallus (from Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome)

    Meanwhile, under the terms of our military system, attention to how this money actually gets spent by our yet-to-be-audited Pentagon tends to be — to put the matter politely — spotty
     
    Just come out and say "Criminal." Or, look at whose books THE PENTAGON is auditing:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/30/usaid-in-central-africa/

    The legal profession exists to implement the rule of law. We hope that the result is some approximation of justice
     
    Colonel, we haven't had a constitution & rule of law since the National Security Act of 1947. What we have is called "color of law." You might wish to study up on that:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/12/01/the-oath-and-the-trash-bin/

    I don’t know about you, but I worry more about the implications of China’s rise and Russian misbehavior than I do about Islamic terrorism. And I worry more about changing weather patterns here in New England or somebody shutting down the electrical grid in my home town than I do about what Beijing and Moscow may be cooking up
     
    That's just oymoronish stupid (typo?) because it's our military and intelligence agencies combined behavior, inclusive of radicalizing Islam and setting it loose in Western China and Russia's Caucus, is no small reason for those rising giants looking at us like we're rabid dogs. BTW if you're really worried about the grid going down, well, you might have a look at EMP:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/10/14/devolution-part-1/

    As for:

    "The generals who followed one another in presiding over that war are undoubtedly estimable, well-intentioned men..."
     
    The colonel is just flat out wrong; and I don't give a rat's a** if I was a mere sergeant and Bacevich was a colonel, because I went on to work in the trenches investigating corruption and the colonel went to the la-la-land of the ivory tower. Here's the real score:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/05/26/counterfeit-coin/

    All in all, the colonel's article is a fail.

    There of course is no USA terrorism, those in Virginia that fire Hellfire from Predators go to church, and do not blow themselves up when murdering.
    Those with explosive belts are the terrorists.
    The problem just is that at the explosive belt side they have the opposite view about who the terrorists are.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • “By common consent, the United States today has the world’s best military. By some estimates, it may be the best in recorded history.”

    Maybe for today, but for recorded history, the nod goes clearly to the Romans, who knew how to fight and conquer like Romans. We’re just getting to our end-game via cheap imported labour and general societal decadence a bit faster than they.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CK
    Most expensive does not equal best.
    , @Mike P

    [Bacevich: ... best military evah ... ] Maybe for today, but for recorded history, the nod goes clearly to the Romans, who knew how to fight and conquer like Romans.
     
    The Roman armies are a good example, as are Ramses' Egyptians, Cambyses' Persians, Pausanias' and Lysander's Spartans, Epaminondas' Thebans, Alexander's Macedonians, Genghis' Mongols, Peter the Great Russians, Napoleon's French, Frederick's and von Moltke's Prussians ... I could go on all day. Sure the US forces are the strongest right now, but within history, they are nothing special. In terms of bang for the buck, they are utterly pathetic, one reason being of course that the arms development and procurement agenda has been totally hijacked by corporate interests.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Uebersetzer
    Magic armour-piercing rounds do not typically weigh 130 tons or whatever the weight of airliners on 9-11 was. Airliners flying into high towers is a sufficiently rare phenomenon that it may be difficult to be polemical about what would or would not happen, but I don't think the building would remain pristine.

    I don’t think the building would remain pristine.

    Well, I don’t recall anybody saying that the building would be “pristine”. However a hundred ton jet hitting a 500,000 ton building, of which 100,000 tons is structural steel, that’s not going to cause the entire building to disintegrate in short order.

    And the much vaunted 90,000 litres of jet fuel is less than one liter of fuel for every ton of steel.

    And then even if you can explain all this away, what about WTC 7?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • The main thing in this world that frightens me is USA militarism.
    De Gaulle already said ‘the USA thinks that force is the solution to any problem’.
    About the best army, in NATO excercises comparing armies the Dutch most of the time won.
    USA commanders never understood how without orders a problem was solved, while USA soldiers were waiting for orders.
    With regard to discipline, the Dutch were the worst.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    The reason that US militarism is so frightening is that like its parent English imperialism it is insatiable and the very definition of self-righteous and features a world class ability to lie and deceive.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Felix Keverich
    Was that a response to my comment?

    We seem to have very different views on how EU operates, and in my opinion your views are ridiculous! It's plain absurd to think that Eastern EU members like Poland can have much impact on EU decisionmaking.

    It was Washington's idea to block South Stream and Nord Stream. The European Comission then succesfully imposed Washington's will on a little Bulgaria, but has struggled to impose it on Germany thus far. The role of Poland in this story is to act as a cheerleader for US-led action, nothing more. The role of the European Comission is to be an enforcer (comissar) for Washington's obkom.

    Was that a response to my comment?

    Yes.

    We seem to have very different views on how EU operates, and in my opinion your views are ridiculous!

    Says the guy who denies Europeans agency.

    It was Washington’s idea to block South Stream and Nord Stream.

    Why are so certain that it was the case?
    The German government would not back NS II as much as they did if it would not strengthen Germany’s role as European gas hub.
    South Stream did not serve this role and was blocked.
    For Poles, it would be beneficially not to reduce Poland’s role as transit country, hence they have a legit reason to oppose NS II which avoids Poland.

    It is not always Washington to blame. Europeans countries are perfectly willing to screw each other.
    One of the reasons why Americans are so dominant in Europe is that they can take advantage of that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    OTOH the Americans were also quite opposed to both Streams. I remember back when in 2008 the then leftist Hungarian PM Gyurcsány had good relations with Putin, and pushed for South Stream, and the Americans were criticizing us for it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @JL

    Whole point of sunk costs is that they aren’t factored in and should be dismissed. In this case that cost is now irrelevant and if you get a higher return shipping to Europe or Asia than selling domestically then you should.
     
    Yes, that was my point, perhaps I wasn't being clear.

    I find it hard to believe US LNG will ever be cheaper than Rus nat gas, or MENA nat gas, for Europe. Building more LNG facilities makes no sense, unless justified by bogus geopolitical concerns. Reality is a number of EE countries joined NATO even whilst depending on Rus nat gas one hundred percent, and their elites pursue very unfriendly foreign policies regardless of dependency on Rus nat gas.
     
    You and I may find those geopolitical concerns bogus, others take them quite seriously. The Euro currency doesn't make much economic sense, but geopolitical concerns have managed to hold it together far longer than I thought would be tenable. As for the EE countries joining NATO while being completely dependent on natural gas, human nature seems to suggest that people often think it is feasible to have their cake and eat it too. Russia's policy of subsidizing former Soviet republics with cheap gas and open markets in exchange for neutral (not even friendly!) foreign policies seemed quite reasonable, yet here we are.

    I did think you meant that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I have never ruled out the possibility that Russia is responsible for the attack in Salisbury, amongst other possibilities. But I do rule out the possibility that Assad is dropping chemical weapons in Ghouta. In this extraordinary war, where Saudi-funded jihadist head choppers have Israeli air support and US and UK military “advisers”, every time...
  • @Sean
    Obama could have attacked the Alawite family dictatorship in Syria on his own authority without asking anyone. He didn't, Under Trump there have been attacks of little materiel significance that haven't done anything to halt the advance of the Assad regieme territory; victories won by Iranian infantry and Russian ground attack planes. The West would simply like him to meet his obligations and stop gassing people as there is an international agreement against killing people that way. Why can't he just stick to the normal use of high explosives to blast them to pieces?

    There’s also an international agreement prohibiting aggressive war. Perhaps you can alert the State Department. Nikki hasn’t heard of it either. Alert her too!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @LondonBob
    Whole point of sunk costs is that they aren't factored in and should be dismissed. In this case that cost is now irrelevant and if you get a higher return shipping to Europe or Asia than selling domestically then you should.

    I find it hard to believe US LNG will ever be cheaper than Rus nat gas, or MENA nat gas, for Europe. Building more LNG facilities makes no sense, unless justified by bogus geopolitical concerns. Reality is a number of EE countries joined NATO even whilst depending on Rus nat gas one hundred percent, and their elites pursue very unfriendly foreign policies regardless of dependency on Rus nat gas.

    Whole point of sunk costs is that they aren’t factored in and should be dismissed. In this case that cost is now irrelevant and if you get a higher return shipping to Europe or Asia than selling domestically then you should.

    Yes, that was my point, perhaps I wasn’t being clear.

    I find it hard to believe US LNG will ever be cheaper than Rus nat gas, or MENA nat gas, for Europe. Building more LNG facilities makes no sense, unless justified by bogus geopolitical concerns. Reality is a number of EE countries joined NATO even whilst depending on Rus nat gas one hundred percent, and their elites pursue very unfriendly foreign policies regardless of dependency on Rus nat gas.

    You and I may find those geopolitical concerns bogus, others take them quite seriously. The Euro currency doesn’t make much economic sense, but geopolitical concerns have managed to hold it together far longer than I thought would be tenable. As for the EE countries joining NATO while being completely dependent on natural gas, human nature seems to suggest that people often think it is feasible to have their cake and eat it too. Russia’s policy of subsidizing former Soviet republics with cheap gas and open markets in exchange for neutral (not even friendly!) foreign policies seemed quite reasonable, yet here we are.

    Read More
    • Replies: @LondonBob
    I did think you meant that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • I have never ruled out the possibility that Russia is responsible for the attack in Salisbury, amongst other possibilities. But I do rule out the possibility that Assad is dropping chemical weapons in Ghouta. In this extraordinary war, where Saudi-funded jihadist head choppers have Israeli air support and US and UK military “advisers”, every time...
  • @Sean
    If the US wanted to take on Russia it would have done it in the Ukraine. The US could have taken out Assad with one week of air strikes, before the Russian arrived. They didn't because Syria is not worth it.

    Assad regieme n authorities declared to the relevant international organisation years ago that they had a chemical and bacterial weapons program, and Russia cooperated in the hand over for destruction of all such declared Assad assets .There is a convention against use of chemical weapons and Assad has breached it repeated in the Syrian civil war( that started when he stupidly put up the price of basic necessities) . Anyway he got a second slap on the wrist, and he knows what to do if he wants another one.

    ** Syria is not worth it. **

    On the contrary, the US appears to be obsessed with Syria. And whatever the true interests of the US are, they are precisely what the elite wish to avoid at all costs.

    Sure Assad used chemical weapons. To achieve no tactical advantage ever and guaranteed to stir up Western liars, manipulators, and bed wetters to his strategic disadvantage. Sure. He’s THAT stupid. Let’s see now . . . a rational, gentlemanly medical professional used chemical weapons or jihadi terrorist scum used chemical weapons? Whoa. That’s a really tough one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • What Happens When a Few Volunteer and the Rest Just Watch?

    …the volunteers become mercenaries for Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Patricus
    If Jews direct our military forces for their nefarious ends these Jews must be incompetent halfwits. How did making Iraq an Iranian client benefit Israel? Did the Libyan failure benefit Israel? Is the Syrian/Russian/Iranian state a boon to Israel? Maybe Israel should try something else.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @JL
    This is an oversimplification and Thorfinnsson also wrote "in theory". Once the infrastructure is built (supertankers and LNG plants), the costs are not so immense. Furthermore, even if export prices were to fall, that infrastructure represents sunken costs which need to be recouped, even if that means operating at a loss.

    This was seen with the shale oil industry in the US. Lifting costs, before 2014, were around $80/barrel. But they mostly kept on pumping even with the price at half that because their creditors would rather see $0.50 on the dollar returned than zero. Technology and adjustments down the services chain have reduced costs on shale oil, but they're still not very far from break even.

    Whole point of sunk costs is that they aren’t factored in and should be dismissed. In this case that cost is now irrelevant and if you get a higher return shipping to Europe or Asia than selling domestically then you should.

    I find it hard to believe US LNG will ever be cheaper than Rus nat gas, or MENA nat gas, for Europe. Building more LNG facilities makes no sense, unless justified by bogus geopolitical concerns. Reality is a number of EE countries joined NATO even whilst depending on Rus nat gas one hundred percent, and their elites pursue very unfriendly foreign policies regardless of dependency on Rus nat gas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JL

    Whole point of sunk costs is that they aren’t factored in and should be dismissed. In this case that cost is now irrelevant and if you get a higher return shipping to Europe or Asia than selling domestically then you should.
     
    Yes, that was my point, perhaps I wasn't being clear.

    I find it hard to believe US LNG will ever be cheaper than Rus nat gas, or MENA nat gas, for Europe. Building more LNG facilities makes no sense, unless justified by bogus geopolitical concerns. Reality is a number of EE countries joined NATO even whilst depending on Rus nat gas one hundred percent, and their elites pursue very unfriendly foreign policies regardless of dependency on Rus nat gas.
     
    You and I may find those geopolitical concerns bogus, others take them quite seriously. The Euro currency doesn't make much economic sense, but geopolitical concerns have managed to hold it together far longer than I thought would be tenable. As for the EE countries joining NATO while being completely dependent on natural gas, human nature seems to suggest that people often think it is feasible to have their cake and eat it too. Russia's policy of subsidizing former Soviet republics with cheap gas and open markets in exchange for neutral (not even friendly!) foreign policies seemed quite reasonable, yet here we are.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Introduction Political leaders and the mass media deluge the public with a constant stream of frightening incidents caused by the enemy-of-the-week: nerve gas killing dozens of little babies in Syria, Russian-directed poison assassination attempts in England and terror incidents throughout Europe, requiring an increase in domestic police state surveillance and spying. Extensively monitored bank records,...
  • @Miro23

    This can only be because the majority of Americans are idiots.

    America’s problems cannot be corrected by elections.
     
    The US has always been more of an economic construct than other nations. It was built on people abandoning the Old World in search of economic opportunity. They weren't idiots, and they had great success - but it's a country without much of a history. Americans trace their "roots" back to other countries in Europe, Africa, South America or Asia.

    In other words the Chinese, Japanese, British or Russians are more homogeneous and ethnically defined, and have lived in and defended the same lands for millennia.

    Americans are more open to defining themselves economically (consumers), rather than national/historically (citizens), and "consumers" are about the most politically inactive group of people imaginable.

    Important insight.

    thanks.

    The Persian empire also offers interesting lessons: diverse ethnic groups were encompassed in the Persian empire and under the system of Cyrus, each conquered state continued its own cultural traditions. They were not melted into a pot of identity-less gravy but intermingled in a khoresh, a stew.
    Later, the Persian empire was conquered by alien invaders who imposed their mores and intermarried with the Persian people.
    Over the millennia, Iran has surrendered large chunks of territory, but a core of Iranian cultural identity, culture, and land mass persists, unified by realistic awareness of their history and a mindset that reveres their artists and poets greater than warriors.

    But to my mind, what most distinguishes Iranian culture is that at its heart, it is not of the Abrahamic root, it is Zoroastrian. The essential element of Abrahamism is intolerance and conquest to force compliance. The essence of Zoroastrianism is the individual’s monitoring of his moral behavior, in his thoughts, words and actions.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @neutral

    What makes you think that Germans (and other Europeans) have much agency in this situation at all?
     
    I agree with this, but take it a step further, what makes you think that Americans (as in their politicians) have much agency? Their allegiance to Israel is absolute, the US is in turn a jewish led institution.

    I agree with this, but take it a step further, what makes you think that Americans (as in their politicians) have much agency? Their allegiance to Israel is absolute, the US is in turn a jewish led institution.

    US is dominated by its own “Jewish community”, but Washington is an actual power center, a place where political decisions are being made, unlike Brussels, whose main function is to relay and enforce orders from Washington.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • JL says:
    @Felix Keverich

    Exporting LNG, at least in large quantities, isn’t really in our interests at all.

    This will cause our domestic gas prices to rise. In theory, they will rise until they will converge with high-cost markets like East Asia.
     
    They won't converge. Domestic natural gas prices in the US will always be substantially below the international levels, because the costs associated with liquefying gas and trasporting it in tankers are immense.

    This is an oversimplification and Thorfinnsson also wrote “in theory”. Once the infrastructure is built (supertankers and LNG plants), the costs are not so immense. Furthermore, even if export prices were to fall, that infrastructure represents sunken costs which need to be recouped, even if that means operating at a loss.

    This was seen with the shale oil industry in the US. Lifting costs, before 2014, were around $80/barrel. But they mostly kept on pumping even with the price at half that because their creditors would rather see $0.50 on the dollar returned than zero. Technology and adjustments down the services chain have reduced costs on shale oil, but they’re still not very far from break even.

    Read More
    • Replies: @LondonBob
    Whole point of sunk costs is that they aren't factored in and should be dismissed. In this case that cost is now irrelevant and if you get a higher return shipping to Europe or Asia than selling domestically then you should.

    I find it hard to believe US LNG will ever be cheaper than Rus nat gas, or MENA nat gas, for Europe. Building more LNG facilities makes no sense, unless justified by bogus geopolitical concerns. Reality is a number of EE countries joined NATO even whilst depending on Rus nat gas one hundred percent, and their elites pursue very unfriendly foreign policies regardless of dependency on Rus nat gas.
    , @Felix Keverich
    Irrelevant. I wasn't making a comment on the commercial viability of LNG exports from the US. I said that the price of this exported gas will always be greater than the price of gas in the US.

    To be sure American companies, under certain conditions, will export LNG at a loss. Even then the price of this gas must account for liquefaction and transportation costs.

    Simply put:

    Price of exported LNG = price of gas on the domestic market + liquefaction and transportation costs
    (those include the cost of electricity for the plants, fuel for the tankers, wages - they remain substantial even after infrustructure is build).

    ^This equation will always hold in a market economy.


    Russia’s policy of subsidizing former Soviet republics with cheap gas and open markets in exchange for neutral (not even friendly!) foreign policies seemed quite reasonable, yet here we are.
     
    It was a stupid policy and Russia deserved to be punished for disregarding the rules of the market economy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mitleser
    @Felix Keverich

    Aren't they Europeans who have European interests?

    If the German government and others can prevent South Stream and get away with it, why shouldn't the Polish government do the same to NS II?

    Was that a response to my comment?

    We seem to have very different views on how EU operates, and in my opinion your views are ridiculous! It’s plain absurd to think that Eastern EU members like Poland can have much impact on EU decisionmaking.

    It was Washington’s idea to block South Stream and Nord Stream. The European Comission then succesfully imposed Washington’s will on a little Bulgaria, but has struggled to impose it on Germany thus far. The role of Poland in this story is to act as a cheerleader for US-led action, nothing more. The role of the European Comission is to be an enforcer (comissar) for Washington’s obkom.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mitleser

    Was that a response to my comment?
     
    Yes.

    We seem to have very different views on how EU operates, and in my opinion your views are ridiculous!
     
    Says the guy who denies Europeans agency.

    It was Washington’s idea to block South Stream and Nord Stream.
     
    Why are so certain that it was the case?
    The German government would not back NS II as much as they did if it would not strengthen Germany's role as European gas hub.
    South Stream did not serve this role and was blocked.
    For Poles, it would be beneficially not to reduce Poland's role as transit country, hence they have a legit reason to oppose NS II which avoids Poland.

    It is not always Washington to blame. Europeans countries are perfectly willing to screw each other.
    One of the reasons why Americans are so dominant in Europe is that they can take advantage of that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Steve Gittelson

    Another very bitter failed writer of the Great American Novel?
     
    Novel? Perish the thought. BS Philosophy, MS Computer Science. No interest in novels at all -- haven't read fiction since a rather dreadful trip to St. Croix in 2007.

    However, in support of, and response to your gratuitous personal attack, based in conspiracy theory hurt feewings ... bite me, loser.

    I get it, you’re the Git’s Spittle. Corporate assfuck and proud of it, eh? Science man, eh? Read your Popular Science article, no doubt, which convinced you beyond any doubt, because THE AUTHORITIES SAID SO. Mommy issues? No doubt. Take yourself a nice bubble bath.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Avery
    {I don’t follow domestic Armenian politics, }

    It is obvious you don't, that's why you don't know.


    {but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan – who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs –}

    Former President, and now PM Serzh Sargsyan _is_ unpopular, but it has nothing to do with utilities tariff: the tariffs issue was long time ago, it was resolved, and not a current issue. He is unpopular for other reasons.

    { This was accompanied by a bill making Armenia a parliamentary republic, in effect extending his rule.}

    Nope, it was not a bill
    You can't do that by a bill.
    There was a constitutional referendum in 2015, passed by 66% with ~51% turnout that changed the form of government so that instead of the President being directly elected by the people, the majority party in the Parliament would select both the President and the Prime Minister. There were some other changes, but that was the main reason for the referendum.

    The title of 'Prime Minister' is a little misleading in this context, because generally in a Parliamentary form of government the PM is real head of state, the Commander in Chief, etc and a President is just a ceremonial post, if one exists. In Armenia the President is the Commander in Chief, responsible for foreign affairs, etc and the PM is for internal: economy and such.

    The constitutional change was championed by Serzh Sargsyan. Understanding by the people for approving the change was that he would not seek to become the PM, and thus extend his rule indefinitely on the sly. He kinda/sorta promised as much when selling the change.

    The current protests are because the people feel as if Serzh Sargsyan is just spitting on their face by becoming PM.

    He made a BIG mistake.
    He should have been happy with his accomplishments, and retired from public life honorably.
    Now he is despised and ridiculed.
    And the word from Yerevan is that the source of much discontent in Armenia - the group of oligarchs and big thieves who rob the country and the economy (...one of whom is his own brother), and who were protected by Serzh's administration - pretty much forced him to take the PM position, because they are afraid to lose their privileged positions if new blood comes in.


    {There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days.}

    One can never say "never", but highly unlikely.
    Too many reasons why something like that is a near impossibility in Armenia.
    Maybe another post.

    Thanks for this comment.

    Invaluable to have the input of an Armenian on this issue.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    Jonathan, if you really want to pursue this I have a few thoughts.

    They don’t come from the internet they come from an original source, me.

    Like non existent Betty Ong and her crisis actor siblings I’m born, raised and lived most of my life in San Francisco.

    So I don’t need google maps or any other internet source.

    Like most people on this site, I picked up somewhere that Betty Ong went to George Washington High on 32nd Avenue a couple blocks from Geary in the outer Richmond district of San Francisco. I lived less than a mile north of that school.

    I assumed that because she went to Washington she and her family lived in the outer Richmond.

    I just read the Wikipedia entry. It says she grew up in Chinatown. Now, Chinatown is about 5 miles from Washington High. And whether by car or bus it’s a ghastly trip. By car it takes a good hour during week day traffic.

    To get there by bus it would involve 2 buses and a cable car. It would take an hour or more twice a day. After the cable car she would have to wait at the Geary st bus stop.

    It’s horrible, especially when it rains. Picture 50 people trying to crowd unto the Geary st bus. Then the horrible crowded awful bus that goes about 5 miles an hour till it gets west of Van Ness.

    Now, why would she or her parents want her to waste 2 to 3 hours a day to go to a perfectly ordinary average public high school when there is an ordinary public school, Galileo right in Chinatown?

    If her parents sent her to Mercy SF or St Rose or Lick-Wilmerding or another private school in western SF the horrible commute would be worth it.

    But to go to Washington? Unless it was a forced bussing thing.
    Someone found a Gloria Ong graduated 1972 from Galileo the Chinatown high school. That’s the right name and age of the sister.

    Revulsky found an inter net Washington yearbook and the only Betty Ong was black.

    There are about 75 private and public high schools in SF. St Rose closed after the 1989 earthquake. Many of the private schools opened after Betty Ong was high school age. Does anyone want to search all those schools? Not me

    Go ahead Sparkon, use your wonderful google skills and tell me how I am wrong about how to to get from Chinatown to the outer Richmond.

    Your pontificating about cities you’ve never been to is ridiculous. You should be embarrassed

    So why don’t you be the one to go to the school, get the yearbook, contact classmates, interview them on any recollections or lack of them? Clear things up! Concrete evidence is needed, no more off the internet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Couple days ago I posted that I’m going to San Francisco for the summer and I might go to Washington and try to get the yearbook.

    But now I doubt she went to Washington. 76 high schools in San Francisco Maybe Sparkon can use google maps to find the yearbook.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • The essay starts out on the wrong path and never finds its way: men and women in today’s military do not “volunteer” and “serve,” they make application and are employed; their status as employees is no different from a Walmart clerk but of less benefit to the common good than the men and women who collect the garbage or run the town’s water-treatment system.

    They are not employed to wage war, i.e. to defend the nation against attack, they are employed to carry out exactly what Fran Macadam stated in #4: to take what belongs to somebody else.

    While I agree with most of Anon (425)’s analysis and apt analogy to a physician/surgeon cutting into a human body; and contrary to Fran Macadam’s demur in #3, I also agree that civilian authorities are pulling the strings to set that physician/military to work on the wrong patient; I disagree that “the Military Industrial Complex . . . has no agency and autonomy” and vehemently object to equating employees in the MIC to “dogs who like to hunt.”

    No human being surrenders his moral agency either before “voluntarily” becoming an employee of any organization or in carrying out the tasks as an employee.
    Men and women who apply for employment in MIC are not dogs, they have moral agency: they know beforehand that the tasks they will carry out are to kill people and destroy things that belong to other people.

    The first moral injunction of the physician is, Do No Harm.
    Just War concepts that St. Augustine (among others) made a part of western civilization impose a similar constraint.

    That is why the US Constitution requires that the representatives of the people Declare War: sending members of the community off to kill other people and destroy their homes is such a serious — “evil,” as Bacevich notes — act that the people must consider the act long and hard before taking that decision. An Authorization to Use Military Force is NOT a declaration of war, it is a sophist’s abrogation of his responsibility in order to achieve a nefarious purpose.

    The man or woman who kills, destroys, or plunders in a military action that is not the object of a properly declared war is just as guilty of murder, theft, and crimes against humanity as the civilian authorities who set those acts in motion.

    That this is so is proved by actions such as this:

    94-year-old man charged with serving in Auschwitz death camp

    https://nypost.com/2015/02/23/94-year-old-man-charged-with-serving-in-auschwitz/

    and

    94-Year-Old Auschwitz Guard Charged as “Juvenile” © Sputnik / Valeriy Melnikov
    16.04.2018(updated 18:43 16.04.2018)

    https://sputniknews.com/europe/201804161063619620-nazi-germany-auschwitz-trial/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • At last some sense. The US Army and IDF ground forces are useless in the ME theater and the US Navy and Airforce are technologically obsolete compared to Russia. Why is that a bad thing?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Erebus

    I find it almost hard to believe that Ron Unz is so unopen to this idea being true. He seems to be totally on board with 911–why can’t he leap any further?
     
    I don't find it odd at all.

    In a nutshell, humans live, not in the Newtonian world, but in a narrative. They need the meaning(s) that only a narrative can lend to the cold interactions of forces and masses. The narratives get more and more complex as one goes up the food chain. At the socio-political level they can get complex indeed, and the people who have seen success within the prevailing socio-political narrative have the most invested in it. Typically, they're are also the ones best equipped to defend it.

    What plebes like us believe doesn't matter. "The Ruling classes" have ever depended on the total capitulation of the intelligentsia, political, and upper economic classes to the narrative for their power. That is the great insight of Orwell's 2+2=5. Belief in an absurdity signifies total capitulation, even when it's feigned.

    I've (literally) watched competent, successful engineers do the maths on the collapse of the towers, stare at the results, and reject them. Some broke contact with me.

    In this Betty Ong yearbook case, we see the process in action. Presented with increasingly persuasive evidence, Ron's went from "85-90%" certainty of her existence to "90-95%". If a real original copy equally or more compelling were to be put in front of him, it wouldn't surprise me much if he simply walked away from the wager. The narrative will defend itself any way it can.

    Well said, and I completely agree. Another incredible phenomenon is this utterly bizarre existence.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Frederic Bastiat

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge (“see, it’s only thanks to us because of us generous we are!”). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.
     
    FDI was 176 Billion in 2016. Polish GDP was 469 Billion.

    https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/foreign-direct-investment
    https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/gdp

    Ah, I see that GDP was in US Dollar. FDI in Euros. Apples and Oranges. Still, does not change the big picture.

    I would guess that Old Europe has a majority share in FDI in Poland because of the unified market. That is probably also a huge incentive for investors from other countries because they can export their products from Poland to Western Europe which has much higher purchasing power.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Aren’t they Europeans who have European interests?

    If the German government and others can prevent South Stream and get away with it, why shouldn’t the Polish government do the same to NS II?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Felix Keverich
    Was that a response to my comment?

    We seem to have very different views on how EU operates, and in my opinion your views are ridiculous! It's plain absurd to think that Eastern EU members like Poland can have much impact on EU decisionmaking.

    It was Washington's idea to block South Stream and Nord Stream. The European Comission then succesfully imposed Washington's will on a little Bulgaria, but has struggled to impose it on Germany thus far. The role of Poland in this story is to act as a cheerleader for US-led action, nothing more. The role of the European Comission is to be an enforcer (comissar) for Washington's obkom.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • A “petulant, overarmed Russia” is a “security issue” for the U.S.? It would kind of seem to be the other way around. Colonel, you’re well outside the mainstream media here. No need for even a courtesy bow to political correctness.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    A “petulant, overarmed Russia” is a “security issue” for the U.S.? It would kind of seem to be the other way around.
     
    That's a real gagger. Glad I didn't waste time reading the article and instead jumped right to the comments.

    It's an old trick to blame others for what you're doing. E.g., the Reds, who openly advocated and agitated for permanent worldwide revolution, blamed the Nazis for wanting to take over the world.

    A couple of other examples,


    "Blame others for your own sins."
    J. V. Stalin, Anarchism Or Socialism ? December, 1906 — January, 1907

     


    Romans 2:1 You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge another, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.

     

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Thorfinnsson
    Exporting LNG, at least in large quantities, isn't really in our interests at all.

    This will cause our domestic gas prices to rise. In theory, they will rise until they will converge with high-cost markets like East Asia.

    This will terminate our current competitive edge in industries such as petrochemicals and sponge iron.

    Exporting American LNG is rather about:

    1 - The interests of the oil companies themselves
    2 - America's absurd and dangerous Russophobia

    Fortunately just this once I can be grateful to the environmentalists and NIMBYs. There will only be a limited number of LNG export terminals built, so our gas prices will remain low.

    Exporting LNG, at least in large quantities, isn’t really in our interests at all.

    This will cause our domestic gas prices to rise. In theory, they will rise until they will converge with high-cost markets like East Asia.

    They won’t converge. Domestic natural gas prices in the US will always be substantially below the international levels, because the costs associated with liquefying gas and trasporting it in tankers are immense.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JL
    This is an oversimplification and Thorfinnsson also wrote "in theory". Once the infrastructure is built (supertankers and LNG plants), the costs are not so immense. Furthermore, even if export prices were to fall, that infrastructure represents sunken costs which need to be recouped, even if that means operating at a loss.

    This was seen with the shale oil industry in the US. Lifting costs, before 2014, were around $80/barrel. But they mostly kept on pumping even with the price at half that because their creditors would rather see $0.50 on the dollar returned than zero. Technology and adjustments down the services chain have reduced costs on shale oil, but they're still not very far from break even.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • During the bombing of Baghdad in January 1991 I went with other journalists on a government-organised trip to what they claimed was the remains of a baby milk plant at Abu Ghraib which the US had just destroyed, saying that it was really a biological warfare facility. Walking around the wreckage, I found a smashed-up...
  • anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:

    We Should be Sceptical of Those Who Claim to Know the Events in Syria?

    This essay is ironic to the extreme, especially because this same “journalist” has also submitted another essay here;

    http://www.unz.com/pcockburn/yazidis-who-suffered-under-isis-now-face-forced-conversion-to-islam/

    I’ll take his own advice given above.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • Great article. This piece by a guest author on the Saker blog makes a good addition to this piece. It puts the issue in a moral context:

    http://thesaker.is/ask-yourselves-are-we-the-bad-guys/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cold N. Holefield
    It is an excellent article, but please, don't sully it with The Saker.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Polish Perspective

    Poland, for example, receives around twice as much free money or aid from the EU, than the entire world UN annual budget. I guess Poland might be the most aid receiving country in the world? (I wonder if anyone has done calculations of this topic?)

     

    https://i.imgur.com/yNvMzzD.jpg

    Poland isn't even in the top 5 once you adjust for GNI. It's true that Poland gets most in absolute terms, but that's also because we are way bigger than most EE countries. I find a lot of economic innumerate to fail to understand this point and just repeat "yes but they get THIS MANY BILLIONS". But without adjusting for economic size is meaningless. Sad to see that you are not smarter than this, Dmitry.

    Also, this is counted from the year 2000. The latest EU funds flow constitute about 1% of our GNI according to our central bank. The next one will be half that, even if no change is done, simply on account of a growing economy and a closer realignment to the EU median.

    Furthermore, whenever we are talking about EU funds this should be kept in mind:

    https://i.imgur.com/YNiPO03.png

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge ("see, it's only thanks to us because of us generous we are!"). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.

    You can see this in sector after sector. Take retail. A German goes to shop in Aldi, Lidl or Kaufmann. All domestic firms. Poles and Czechs shop at the same stores, with Carrefour thrown into the mix. As you can see from the chart, the most drained country of us all is Czechia. No wonder euroskepticism is high there.

    And I haven't even talked about the fact that Western European countries benefit massively from labour and we lose, in some instances permanently.

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge (“see, it’s only thanks to us because of us generous we are!”). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.

    FDI was 176 Billion in 2016. Polish GDP was 469 Billion.

    https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/foreign-direct-investment

    https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/gdp

    Read More
    • Replies: @Frederic Bastiat
    Ah, I see that GDP was in US Dollar. FDI in Euros. Apples and Oranges. Still, does not change the big picture.

    I would guess that Old Europe has a majority share in FDI in Poland because of the unified market. That is probably also a huge incentive for investors from other countries because they can export their products from Poland to Western Europe which has much higher purchasing power.
    , @Polish Perspective

    FDI was 176 Billion in 2016. Polish GDP was 469 Billion.
     
    China gets around 100-120 billion USD per year in FDI. Who knew that Poland gets 50% more than China with less than 1/20th the population?

    Please, learn basic math first before opining. Your basic common sense should have kicked in long ago when you even typed that comment.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mitleser

    I don’t recall them freezing the assets of top officials in Erdogan’s government.
     
    They froze Turkey's EU accession bid.
    Considering that Turkey has to adjust its tariffs and duties to match those of the EU (Customs Union) and Turkey's economic dependence on EUrope, that is not a good thing for Turkey.

    That’s because Turkey happens to be a key ally of Washington.

     


    Congress has revived threats to sanction Turkey over the detention of North Carolina Pastor Andrew Brunson, as well as other US citizens and Turkish staff members of US diplomatic missions that it believes are being held as “political pawns.”

    Sens. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., declared in a joint statement April 19 that they would pursue targeted sanctions against Turkish officials in the foreign affairs spending bill for fiscal year 2019. Their statement noted that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan “has continued to violate the trust between our two nations by holding Pastor Brunson and other innocent Americans behind bars on fabricated charges. … Turkish officials who participate in the detainment of any innocent American citizen should face international consequences, and the actions against Pastor Brunson, in particular, qualify as hostage-taking.”
     

    Ankara's bigger worry is the size and terms of the fine the US Treasury will likely slap on Halkbank for sanctions-busting. Turkish officials warn that if the fine is "disproportionately high" and ends up coming out of Turkish taxpayers’ pockets, this will sink relations to new lows.
     

    “Chances of the sanctions language appearing in the next funding cycle are very high,” the source predicted. Moreover, none of this precludes the use of sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Act against Turkish officials for human rights abuses or corruption. “There will be annual lists. This is a very broad authority. If human rights groups want anyone added to the list, they have to build the legal case and give it to Congress to submit to the administration. It’s terrible, but this is the first time the Hill stopped listening to State on Turkey. This is a good time to push,” the source added. “What Erdogan has been doing is shocking. And [the State Department] is shocked. They don’t know what to do. And they’ve been beaten [by senators] into submission.”
     

    Yet should Mike Pompeo be confirmed as the new secretary of state, Washington may grow even less accommodating. Pompeo, a former Republican congressman from Kansas, served as a deacon and taught Sunday school at the Eastminster Presbyterian Church in Wichita, which is part of the Evangelical Presbyterian Church that Brunson belongs to.
     
    https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/04/us-sanctions-loom-defiant-turkey-erdogan-pastor.html

    In a sign that Turkey will continue to stock up on gold, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on April 17 argued that international loans should be based on gold rather than dollars. Speaking at an economic gathering in Istanbul, he remarked, “Why do you have to make the loans in dollars? Let’s base the loans on gold. We need to rid states and nations of exchange rate pressure. Throughout history, gold has never been a means of pressure.” Erdogan also said that he had made the suggestion to International Monetary Fund officials at a G-20 meeting.

    Ankara’s desire to boost the use of gold pertains not only to borrowing, but also to trade. This meshes with its efforts to promote interest-free banking, where lending systems are based on gold. Some, however, see more covert motives behind Turkey’s stocking on gold.

    Ufuk Soylemez, a former state minister for the economy and former head of the state-owned Halkbank, believes Ankara might be taking precautions against the prospect of US sanctions against Halkbank for its role in a scheme to get around sanctions on Iran. In January, Mehmet Atilla, a senior Halkbank manager, was found guilty of conspiracy and bank fraud after a monthlong trial in a New York federal court.

    Soylemez told Al-Monitor, “With an abrupt policy change, the central bank has been selling dollars and raising gold reserves to unprecedented levels, which could be a precaution against the risk of multi-billion dollar US fines on Turkish banks.”

    He also drew attention to other unusual moves by the central bank, noting, “Since the end of last year, it has been intensively selling its US bonds and converting its deposits in the United Sates to gold, in addition to moving gold reserves kept in the United States to Europe.” He added, “As of Feb. 23, gold reserves hit $25.2 billion, up from $14 billion at the end of 2016. Gold now makes up almost a fourth of the total reserves, which are worth some $114.5 billion.”

    According to Soylemez, the idea of using gold to curb the dollar’s dominance in the international banking system and financial markets is easier said than done. “This method can materialize only through bilateral consensus and agreements between countries,” he said. “With Iran, for instance, there was a similar trade in return for gold. Yet convincing the world to accept this as a new system is not easy.”

    In what Soylemez views as another sign of Turkey-US tensions, he noted that the 30-year-old New York branch of the state-owned Ziraat Bank had been recently closed.

    In an April 17 article, Hurriyet’s economy pundit Ugur Gurses reported that last year the central bank withdrew all 28.6 tons of gold it was keeping at the US Federal Reserve, moving it to the Switzerland-based Bank of International Settlements (BIS) and the Bank of England. According to the report, at the end of 2017, Turkey’s gold reserves totaled 564.7 tons, including 375.4 tons at the Bank of England, 18.7 tons at BIS, 33.7 tons at the Turkish central bank and 136.8 tons in the central bank’s account at the Istanbul stock exchange.
     
    https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/04/turkey-why-gold-reserves-on-the-rise.html

    So much, for "key ally of Washington".

    When you look at EU efforts to blocks Russian pipelines for example, they make zero sense from the perspective of European interests.
     
    It makes sense from the perspective of the anti-Russian European interests who are opposed to Russia's increasing share in the European gas market.

    It makes sense from the perspective of the anti-Russian European interests who are opposed to Russia’s increasing share in the European gas market.

    Which are those? You aren’t talking about the government of Poland, are you? LOL

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The Yazidis, who were recently the target of massacre, rape and sex slavery by Isis, are now facing forcible conversion to Islam under the threat of death from Turkish-backed forces which captured the Kurdish enclave of Afrin on 18 March. Islamist rebel fighters, who are allied to Turkey and have occupied Yazidi villages in the...
  • anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:

    This “journalist” bases this essay on one or two people’s testimony, and other nebulous “sources.” I can understand if only Islamist militants were involved… but, the Turkish?

    He says that many Turkish officials say that “if the Kurds live in a tent in Africa, that tent should be destroyed”.

    He says, she says… really? Shameful “journalism.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • So,the purpose of killing is life?

    Read More
    • Replies: @CK
    The definition of being alive is consuming.
    It is easier to steal than to produce
    So, the purpose of life is stealing; the concomitant killing is unavoidable.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    That's the logical and rational view.

    But EU is also worshiped by some - middle-class and educated - Western demographics as a new religion.

    Even in the UK, it was very divided, the society, on this question - and the end result of the voting was within a couple of percent.

    And the UK - is the country in the EU, with the lowest approval ratings for the EU.

    In addition, I would worry that younger generations are very brainwashed into this religion.

    This is much more amongst people like Spanish. When I was learning Spanish, I used read sometimes the Spanish newspaper websites - and they publish many irrational and emotional articles saying how wonderful the EU is (it is a very accepted viewpoint there).

    Well each abrahamic variant sets up its own ideal homogenized populace & empire।।

    Now that catholic continental Europe finally got whore dom enlightenment infection since 60s EU will come।।

    ‘Enlightenment’ is the latest & most virulent abrahamic variant.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The immediate prospect for significant improvement in U.S.-Russia relations now depends on something tangible: Will the forces that sabotaged previous ceasefire agreements in Syria succeed in doing so again, all the better to keep alive the “regime change” dreams of the neoconservatives and liberal interventionists? Or will President Trump succeed where President Obama failed by...
  • Wow, of the many “predictive” articles I’ve read on U.S./Russia (aka Trump/Putin) relations and how much of this hinges on Syria, this one is the real deal. Written 9 months ago and with so much behind it to back it up, Mr. McGovern not only predicted what happened a week ago would happen, he has enough of a full-scale understanding of exactly what is involved here, from things in the past as well as things that are happening today, to be able to predict this would happen long before Trump’s publicing his “intentions” to pull out of Syria.
    I already knew Mr. McGovern knows his stuff; coming across this particular article 9 months later and oddly enough a week after what transpired in Syria, GOOSEBUMPS, and reinforcement of knowing I value his work as I do for a very valid reason.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Talha

    Having said that, Georgia is now being bought out quite rapidly by Gulf Arabs and Turks.
     
    Followed by...

    This must be quite painful, given how nationalistic they are.
     
    Major contradictions here; they can't really be seriously nationalistic if they are selling off real-estate to Arabs and Turks, right? That certainly doesn't fit together.

    Peace.

    Just because the people selling their country to the highest bidder only care about getting the highest price doesn’t mean ordinary Georgians don’t resent it.

    Considering how even in full-pozzed London I’ve heard ordinary people complain about all the foreign oligarchs buying up everything, I don’t find it hard to believe that Georgians might find it painful.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    OK - makes sense - it's much of the same everywhere; the elite sell out the locals to the highest bidder.

    Peace.
    , @Ali Choudhury
    Outside of a few ritzy neighborhoods which would have been out of reach of the ordinary locals going back decades, foreign oligarchs have not been buying that much property in London. Low interest rates are the primary reason prices have skyrocketed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • “Thucydides’s famed .. “The strong do what they will, while the weak suffer what they must.””

    Well, colonel, in case of Thucydides, I’d go with “Their judgment was based more upon blind wishing than upon any sound pre-vision; for it is a habit of mankind to entrust to careless hope what they long for, and to use sovereign reason to thrust aside what they do not fancy” pointing to human nature hasn’t changed one bit, bringing up the more apropos:

    “The extension of the empire has meant the growth of private fortunes. This is nothing new, indeed it is in keeping with the most ancient history” -Gaius Asinius Gallus (from Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome)

    Meanwhile, under the terms of our military system, attention to how this money actually gets spent by our yet-to-be-audited Pentagon tends to be — to put the matter politely — spotty

    Just come out and say “Criminal.” Or, look at whose books THE PENTAGON is auditing:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/30/usaid-in-central-africa/

    The legal profession exists to implement the rule of law. We hope that the result is some approximation of justice

    Colonel, we haven’t had a constitution & rule of law since the National Security Act of 1947. What we have is called “color of law.” You might wish to study up on that:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/12/01/the-oath-and-the-trash-bin/

    I don’t know about you, but I worry more about the implications of China’s rise and Russian misbehavior than I do about Islamic terrorism. And I worry more about changing weather patterns here in New England or somebody shutting down the electrical grid in my home town than I do about what Beijing and Moscow may be cooking up

    That’s just oymoronish stupid (typo?) because it’s our military and intelligence agencies combined behavior, inclusive of radicalizing Islam and setting it loose in Western China and Russia’s Caucus, is no small reason for those rising giants looking at us like we’re rabid dogs. BTW if you’re really worried about the grid going down, well, you might have a look at EMP:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/10/14/devolution-part-1/

    As for:

    “The generals who followed one another in presiding over that war are undoubtedly estimable, well-intentioned men…”

    The colonel is just flat out wrong; and I don’t give a rat’s a** if I was a mere sergeant and Bacevich was a colonel, because I went on to work in the trenches investigating corruption and the colonel went to the la-la-land of the ivory tower. Here’s the real score:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/05/26/counterfeit-coin/

    All in all, the colonel’s article is a fail.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    There of course is no USA terrorism, those in Virginia that fire Hellfire from Predators go to church, and do not blow themselves up when murdering.
    Those with explosive belts are the terrorists.
    The problem just is that at the explosive belt side they have the opposite view about who the terrorists are.
    , @jacques sheete

    Colonel, we haven’t had a constitution & rule of law since the National Security Act of 1947...
     
    Some would peg that almost a century prior or even earlier. The war of Northern bankers against Southern planters proved that the anti-federalists were correct in many ways.

    The constitution was a huge link in the chain around our necks.

    Rule of law? When did that ever happen?
    , @Zumbuddi
    Pat Lang should've glanced at the comments to Bacevich's writings before he posted on Unz,

    The Unz commentariat refuses to be censored or to self-censor (thank you Ron Unz, 1000 X).

    UFers call BS when they smell it.

    Lang scurried back to his gated spiderhole & winged about "delusional" commenters at Unz.

    Don't let the door hit ya.

    , @Iris
    Colonel Bacevich is only playing the devil's advocate, and, in a diplomatic manner, showing the contradictions between the "official" military agenda and the reality of today's world.

    If the US was ruled with the interests of its people and servicemen in mind, it would not be engaged in endless and unwinnable wars. But the NeoCons imperial elite don't care, as they don't have skin in the game, unlike the military (Colonel Bacevich lost his only son in Iraq).

    The fate of an Empire is demise, because it is ruled by the few, who don't care about reality, until this reality engulfs them.
    Patriots try to stop such demise by the modest , realistic means available to them: enlightening people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Disordered thoughts on the National Cockatoo’s latest antics. One: The aghastment and horrilation about the terrible, appalling, shocking etc nature of gas warfare is nonsense. There is nothing unusually hideous about the use of toxic chemicals. Hideous, yes, but not unusually hideous. Boring old workaday artillery, that nobody criticizes, leaves children watching as mommy frantically...
  • anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dagon Shield
    JD, you are so smart and well read yet they have accused of being an Indian... there is no justice!

    you are so smart and well read yet they have accused of being an Indian

    I see what you did there with the implication of that statement.

    I wonder if any hindoo nationalist degenerate with a sufficiently seared butthole will respond to that.

    :D

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @jim jones
    I am going to enjoy reading Unz the day after Trump gets the Nobel Peace Prize for uniting Korea

    That would be further proof of the Evil Empire’s imminent demise. So, witnessing satan’s pussy slink away with its tail between its legs, should be something to rejoice.

    I am all for Trump getting the Hypocrites, er I mean nobel, Peace Prize.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Gittelson
    Goad is a vassal of TakiMag. Cutting and pasting from one webzine to another is considered gauche, if not outright illegal for various and sundry copyright reasons.

    Unz is an okay guy, and reasonably restrained with regard to the multitude of crazies who use his comment-sections for, sometimes, rather wackadoodley semi-hysterical ranting.

    Busy, busy, busy in the Vonnegutian sense.

    with regard to the multitude of crazies who use his comment-sections for, sometimes, rather wackadoodley semi-hysterical ranting.

    I do it all the time. That is what I love about The UR. :D

    See, it is one thing to be armchair crazies, generally quite harmless, just venting our feelings, than be the crazy racist mofers of your kind, who in stark contrast commit satanic evil, causing untold suffering to real people.

    Can your despicable self understand that basic difference?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • “I don’t know about you, but I worry more about the implications of China’s rise and Russian misbehavior”

    I stopped reading here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ploni almoni
    If you stop reading something then you are a case of arrested development. Which is what the Deep State wants.
    , @Anon
    It’s an arrogant comment. What the author wants is to reinstate the draft.

    Let those who want college tuition and free medical care enlist and get it. Let those who want to stay out of the military stays out.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • >muh military hubris
    >”Russian misbehavior”

    Ahahahaha.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Wally
    Speaking of "duping delight", the fake testimonies of people in synthetic events:

    These lying 'survivors' are revealing in regards to the fake '6,000,000, Jews' / impossible 'gas chambers'. These examples are a mere drop in the ocean of the endless, impossible, contradictory lies that are all about the minds of perverted liars, nothing more:

    - According to acclaimed & so called "holocaust eyewitness" Henryk Tauber, corpses could be cremated in 5-7 minutes.
    If you question that in many countries you will be imprisoned.

    - "holocaust $urvivor" Irene Zisblatt, repeatedly eating and defecating several diamonds daily over the course of 18 months, escaping from not one, but two gassing chambers at the last second, or her claim that she and many other inmates were forced to stand for days on end in ankle-deep water, laden with urine and feces. She was also chosen for "eye color change" experiments and her blemish-free skin was destined to be used to make lamp shades -- but she was able to avoid such fate for reasons she is uncertain of.

    - Jew 'Freddie the Pimp' ate human flesh to survive Auschwitz

    - The SS officer [who] was probably a doctor, dressed in white robe, shoved an iron stick, which had a handle on its end, right into my rectum. He then turned the stick and caused an involuntary ejaculation of sperm. A female SS officer [who] worked with the other officer held two pieces of glass underneath my genitals in order to collect a sample of my sperm for the lab. They then made me stand up on a special machine that gave electric waves to both sides of my genitals until again a sperm was ejaculated.

    -Me and a Jewish American (a watchmaker, passport from the USA) were subjected to medical experiments. SS German Shepherd dogs, belonging to the commander of the SS Obersturmfuehrer Rosenbaum, with a special poison on their teeth … we had to run [and] the dogs had to chase us. Afterwards they examined our wounds, the blood. A doctor … ripped the flesh of my legs and examined it. I was able to escape. First to a peasant in a village—afterwards to friends of mine in Krakow.

    much, much more here:
    the so called 'Holocaust' / theatre of the absurd
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=66

    www.codoh.com

    There was a gigantic, organised slaughter of European Jews in the 1940s. I did research in two apparently unrelated areas to it and curiously enough, Jewish victims of the Nazis are present.
    1. The Good Soldier Svejk by the Czech writer Jaroslav Hasek. A character in the novel is a Cadet Biegler. Many characters were based on real-life characters known to the author. One of them was Hans Bigler.

    http://honsi.org/literature/svejk/?page=11&lang=en#Bigler

    Bigler’s father Eduard was killed in Bergen-Belsen in 1944, on account of being Jewish. It is not clear whether Hans Bigler was fully Jewish or part-Jewish although the latter is more likely – half-Jews generally speaking survived the Nazi era although they were despised as Mischlinge. Hans Bigler seems to have attributed his own survival to an Allied air raid on Dresden, where he then lived, destroying Gestapo records.
    2. A Nazi-era (1937) German film called Unternehmen Michael set during the German offensives of 1918. A supporting role in the film was played by the actor Paul Otto. Otto was in fact Jewish but this was not discovered until 1943. When it was discovered, Otto committed suicide with his wife shortly before being deported to the “East”.
    If the Holocaust was a hoax, why was Eduard Bigler killed? And why did a respected German actor like Paul Otto opt for suicide when he was discovered to be of Jewish origin and about to be deported to Auschwitz, Treblinka or some such destination?

    https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0653288/?ref_=tt_cl_t2

    Read More
    • LOL: L.K
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Credit is due: I’ve seen some pretty absurd “arguments” from Holo-believers, but this is a whole new level of stupid.
    , @utu
    Cadet Bigler: People Bergen Belsen usually died from diseases caused by overwork and malnutrition rather than being murdered.

    Paul Otto: indeed people kill themselves out of fear of death which always strikes me as strange.
    , @Jonathan Revusky

    Bigler’s father Eduard was killed in Bergen-Belsen in 1944, on account of being Jewish.
     
    Uebersetzer, even according to the official Holocaustian narrative, Bergen-Belsen was never an extermination camp. The people who were transported there (the most famous case being Anne Frank) died of typhus and other opportunistic diseases.

    Moreover, the terrible conditions at Belsen and Buchenwald (which, again, are not deemed by even the official history to have been extermination camps) arose because of the terrible conditions prevalent in Germany at the time.

    But really, it would be better to know what you're talking about. You can't pull out Bergen-Belsen as an example to support the core narrative of extermination in gas chambers when even the official court historians are saying that Belsen wasn't that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There are two myths which are deeply imprinted in the minds of most US Americans which are extremely dangerous and which can result in a war with Russia. The first myth is the myth of US military superiority. The second myth is the myth of US invulnerability. I believe that it is therefore crucial to...
  • “During the first Cold War both American and Soviet forces took great care to avoid direct conflict, rightly afraid it could lead to uncontrolled escalation.”

    Did you know, that it was WALL STREET BANKERS that FINANCED Russia’s TECHNOLOGICAL rise to Super-Power status, from at least 1945 to 1965? Read Stanford Professor Antony C. Sutton’s book THE BEST ENEMY MONEY CAN BUY. Now, WHY, exactly, would the (((Western 1% CENTRAL BANKERS))) (predominantly counterfeit “Jews”, by the way) SEEK TO EMPOWER (((BOLSHEVIK/SOVIET))) RUSSIA by FINANCING its RISE to Super-Power status? Oops! I think I answered my own question.

    One question: (((WHO))), exactly, would BENEFIT, from starting a WW III between historically WHITE, CHRISTIAN AMERICA, and historically WHITE, ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN RUSSIA? Oops! I just answered my own question, again.

    ALL WARS ARE (((BANKERS))) WARS

    “O, what a tangled web (((we))) weave when first (((we))) practice to deceive” ~ Walter Scott

    Parentheses added. When are AMERICANS going to WAKE THE HELL UP?! Seriously.

    Here is what needs to go mainstream:

    [MORE]

    The so-called “Sephardi” “Jews” (10% of all “Jews” today) are of BERBER-ARAB descent. The remaining 90% of so-called “Jews” today (the “Ashkenazi”) are of SLAVO-TURKIC descent. This means, that they have NO LEGITIMATE CLAIM to being the direct lineal descendants of the original, true IBERI (Hebrews) of the Old Testament era! NONE. WHAT-SO-EVER. Read Paul Wexler’s work in _The Non-Jewish Origins of the Sephardic Jews_, and _The Ashkenazic Jews: A Slavo-Turkic People in Search of a Jewish Identity_. Also, read THE GREAT DECEPTION: SYRIA, BRITAIN AND THE ROMAN CONSPIRACY, by Comyns Beaumont, IF you wish to discover the TRUE geographic location of the people, places & events described in both the Old & New Testament.

    And, (((they))) ADMIT AS MUCH, in (((their))) own publications:

    Encyclopedia Judaica 1971, Vol 10:23: “Jews began to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860 [AD].”

    Page 3 of the 1980 Jewish Almanac states: “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary [modern] Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”

    (You see, what these BERBER-ARABS & SLAVO-TURKS did, was HIJACK the very much VENERATED name & identity of the TRUE, ORIGINAL IBERI, or IBRI (Hebrews) of the Old Testament era (~ highly-esteemed in the minds of Western Christians ~) on their way to HIJACKING the entirety of Western Civilization! When did they do it? 1860 AD. Do you see what they did? They HIJACKED, and appropriated FOR THEMSELVES, the very NAME & IDENTITY of the true, original Hebrews of the Old Testament era, thereby claiming to be their direct lineal descendants, when, in fact, they are NO SUCH THING. Please, wake up some people in your sphere of influence, by sharing these VITAL HISTORICALLY-DOCUMENTED FACTS WITH THEM! Let’s try to save America, shall we?

    With regard to the meaning of ZION-ism, read these three extremely relevant quotes about “Jew”-ish SUPREMACISM (i.e., ZION-ism):

    1) “We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them.” (Goldwin Smith, Jewish Professor of Modern History at Oxford University, October, 1981)

    2) “We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.” (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).

    3) “We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” (Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate).

    Source: 1001 Quotes By and About Jews: https://www.stormfront.org/posterity/13texan/q351-400.htm

    WHY, is all the foregoing SO VITAL for ALL AMERICANS to FULLY comprehend? Read on:

    Study the history of the so-called “Russian” “Revolution”. It was (((Rothschild)))-agents, (((Paul Warburg))), and (((Jacob Schiff))) who FINANCED fellow-tribesman (((Lev Bronstein))) alias (((Leon Trotsky))), FROM WALL STREET!, to the tune of $20 Million (USD) in gold, when (((Bronstein/Trotsky))) boarded a ship in New York Harbor!, bound for Russia, and the (((Rothschild)))-financed overthrow (really massacre) of the 300-year-old ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN Romanov Family Dynasty. It is historically significant, that the so-called “Russian” “Revolution” was a FAKE, PHONY, COUNTERFEIT, IMPOSTER “Jew”-ish operation, from beginning to end, and from top to bottom.

    All America Must Know the Terror That is Upon Us

    https://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPages/ToolBarTopics/Articles/Featured_Authors/strom,_kevin/kevin_strom_works/Kevin_Strom_1991-1994/Kevin_A._Strom_19930814-ADV_All_America_Must_Know_the_Terror_That_Is_Upon_Us.html

    Again, WHY is ALL the foregoing information SO VITAL for EVERY AMERICAN to comprehend? Read on:

    1) Dual Citizenship — Loyal to Whom?, by Dan Eden for View Zone:

    http://www.viewzone.com/dualcitizen.html

    2) Zionists Are a Fifth Column in America:

    http://www.henrymakow.com/zionists_fifth_column_in_ameri.html

    3) How Many U.S. Politicians Can Counterfeit “Israel” Buy with $6.3 Billion Dollars?

    https://needtoknow.news/2018/03/many-politicians-can-buy-6-3-billion-dollars/

    It’s NOT the “New” World Order. It’s the counterfeit “Jew” World Order.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anonymous

    Betty Ong is real, and the phone call she made was real. It was made on a seatback airphone,
     
    Cabin staff (of course) have their own radio communications facilities separate from the optional "airphone" system to talk to ground crew. Equally, and of course, they have well-rehearsed emergency procedures that are presumably not reliant on airphones that may not be available at all.

    It is at least puzzling that established communications procedures for emergencies were not followed.

    Similarly, the third-hand way in which the Betty Ong call was supposedly reduced to writing does not pass the smell test. Why was the call not transferred directly to a senior airline official in charge of security/hijacking issues?

    Maybe there was not a senior official in charge of hijackings

    I wouldn’t be surprised.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • In 2004 I published an article in the journal, Middle East Policy that was entitled “Drinking the Koolaid.” The article reviewed the process by which the neocon element in the Bush Administration seized control of the process of policy formation and drove the United States in the direction of invasion of Iraq and the destruction...
  • @geokat62

    I think it far from absurd to make the distinction between neocons and Zionists, since neocons will certainly not disappear even if Israel disappeared.
     
    Nice try. Neocons, like most liberal Jews, were originally leftists who crossed over the political divide because they realized, especially after witnessing The Left's resistance to the Vietnam War, progressivism would lead to a non-interventionist US foreign policy, spelling disaster for the Jewish state. In other words, Israel is the neocons raison d'être... without it, they would rejoin most of their brethren who reside on the left of the political spectrum. If you require proof of this, just look at how the neocons easily switched over to the Democrats and HC during the 2016 presidential campaign, when Trump promised to end the regime-change wars. That's because the only thing conservative about the neoconservatives is their support for a more hawkish foreign policy, for the benefit of the Jewish state.

    Neocons would be neocons with or without Israel. The tribal aspect is undisputable, there are overlapping interests, but the goals are different. For neocons, as for Soros progressives who are also far from being all Zionists, it’s global domination, for Zionists, it’s Greater Israel, which does btw encompass more land than just the mythical Eretz Israel.
    Obviously, the neocons’ God complex has a lot to do with being “the chosen people” and obviously their rise to prominence wouldn’t have been possible without help from fellow “chosen people” so it’s not such a bad idea to root for Israel, but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn’t help at all achieve the Zionists’ goals. The latter don’t put all their eggs in one basket, and they do in fact have a lot of activity in the back of their American protector but if the USA goes down, the neocons / Soros liberals are gone too.
    In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel – though they’d have to find other ways to pominence than Zionist money -, they’re both phenomenons of the same tribe but one can be contained and can be made to accomodate itself with that containment, the others represent a real threat to Planet Earth. The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    For neocons,... it’s global domination, for Zionists, it’s Greater Israel...
     
    Global domination for neocons is not an end in itself, it is a means to an end... and that end is the enhancement of the security of the Jewish state.

    ... but their obsession with subjugating Russia doesn’t help at all achieve the Zionists’ goals.
     
    Surely, you jest. The neocons like Robert Kaganovitch and his wife Victoria Nudelman, Willian Kristol, David Frum, etc, are obsessed with Russia as Russia is the sponsor of both Iran and Syria, which supply Hezbollah the means by which to keep Israel out of Lebanon.

    In short, Israel would exist without neocons and neocons would exist without Israel
     
    While the former is true, the latter isn’t.

    The Jewish grip on all aspects of public life, Zionism, neoconism are different processes. The first and the last need to be killed.
     
    On this, we both can agree.
    , @Anonymous
    It's a package deal. If they take out Russia, global domination is virtually assured and Israel will get the World's crown sooner or later. At the heart of it there's a messianic lunacy and that's why we're facing WW3 at, say, 90% probability.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @daniel le mouche
    'I’ll admit that the crack about all phone calls made from the hijacked planes on 9/11 as being “plainly fake” according to the “Truth community” was a highly amusing one. That they’re “plainly” fake isn’t quite true as most believe people them to be genuine.'

    Your problem, like most Americans', is that you've been brought up on tv from the cradle. Yet, like so many AMERICANS (and western Europeans, though the percentages drop drastically in other parts of the world who KNOW what the perennial phoney regime actually DOES), you think of yourself as having a very firm grip on reality. Each and every person I know of who has gone over to the other side, has had some sort of epiphany. This initial shock, which turns what they thought they knew of reality completely on its head, is followed by years of unlearning all the bullshit the system--tv, movies, school, bestsellers--has inculcated in them, till finally they believe nothing whatsoever they read or see. And this is right and proper, to use an old term. Look to Ron Unz himself, who has written on this. Perhaps one day you'll get that douse of cold water in your face (or choose your metaphor). Good luck.

    Kind of interesting, this. A staple of Unz comments and some articles is of how low-IQ everyone is outside North America and Western Europe (and even there there are blacks etc.) but suddenly they are more perceptive and see through what is phony, in say, the Central African Republic compared to the States, simply because they watch less TV.

    Read More
    • Replies: @daniel le mouche
    'suddenly they are more perceptive and see through what is phony, in say, the Central African Republic compared to the States, simply because they watch less TV'

    Not only do most people watch far less tv than Americans, but they are actually, many of them, INVADED BY ... Americans (and Brits and French, the grand coalition in lock step). But tv brainwashes anyone it touches. Its extremely harmful effects have to be consciously unlearned, a sometimes painful process (finding out this or that cherished thing is there to do you harm, from sports teams and individuals to favorite tv shows and movies and music).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Congressional representatives call for probe into claims scammers are trying to steal personal information from 9/11 heroes

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5644729/NY-reps-ask-FTC-probe-reports-9-11-compensation-scam.html#ixzz5DTJ4nNqL

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Mulegino1
    What is it about what used to be called the "Third Law of Motion" that these people do not get? Ballistics proves conclusively that the "airliner penetrating structural steel and concrete floor pans" is bollocks. Imagine if anyone tried to market a magic armor piercing round composed of a thin aluminum jacket and a hollow core.!

    Magic armour-piercing rounds do not typically weigh 130 tons or whatever the weight of airliners on 9-11 was. Airliners flying into high towers is a sufficiently rare phenomenon that it may be difficult to be polemical about what would or would not happen, but I don’t think the building would remain pristine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    I don’t think the building would remain pristine.
     
    Well, I don't recall anybody saying that the building would be "pristine". However a hundred ton jet hitting a 500,000 ton building, of which 100,000 tons is structural steel, that's not going to cause the entire building to disintegrate in short order.

    And the much vaunted 90,000 litres of jet fuel is less than one liter of fuel for every ton of steel.

    And then even if you can explain all this away, what about WTC 7?
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    And the buildings weighted 500K tons. No “rare event” speciousness is necessary to understand what should (think bug and windshield).
    , @Cold N. Holefield
    Of course the building would not remain pristine. In fact, I would imagine had the buildings not collapsed, they would have been condemned, and much to Silverstein's Chagrin, the Insurance Payout would have been much less and an inadequate Return on Investment. Instead, he made out like a Bandit.

    Understand the Buildings' Design. The strength of the buildings emanated from their Cores, or at least the strength of The Twin Towers. The Jets never affected the Cores. They were shredded into a million pieces before penetrating that far. The most that should have happened is the collpase of several floors around those incredibly strong and secure Cores, but the Cores would have remained intact. The fact that the Cores fell concomintantly with the not-so-strong Perimeter Space is anomalous and unexpected and has not been explained adequately.

    Here's the base of one of the Beams comprising the Core. It's sheered and there is cooled Molten Metal showing. Since the building fell pretty much straight down in its footprint, this Column Beam would not have been sheered like this and there is no reason for the Molten Metal. Unless.

    Look Mom, No Hands!!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Butcher of Damascus. Gasser of children. Baby Killer of Syria. Tool of Moscow. Cruel despot. Monster. These are all names the western media and politicians routinely heap on Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad. He has now become the top Mideast villain, the man we love to hate. As a veteran Mideast watcher, I find all this...
  • @LondonBob
    Nothing fake about the German atrocities against Belgian civilians, see Dinant. Anyway Britain was allied with the Tsar so the media gatekeepers kept up a steady drumbeat of pro German propaganda so that Anglo-Saxon America could not aid her sister country sooner.

    Nothing fake about the German atrocities against Belgian civilians, see Dinant.

    On the contrary. While there were German atrocities (don’t see Dinant, see German Atrocities, 1914 — A History of Denial), quite a bit of it was fake, some staged in Paris for best effect.

    so that Anglo-Saxon America could not aid her sister country sooner

    This was not “Anglo-Saxon” (more like Anglo-Protestant, amirite?) America’s war to wage, indeed it was not even Great Britain’s war to wage. Anyway the “sister country” lost its Empire (as well its population) while “Anglo-Saxon” America gained its, so a transfer between those “sisters” was a good, old, fat win-lose situation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Anonymous[989] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.
    An evidence trail that is based on a lot of unanswered and decidedly suspicious behavior and contradictions is not evidence making a solid case.

    One need not be a historian to know that a myriad of events have troubling aspects that could filled with sinister explanation --- that alone does not make it so. I am not inclined to find a person guilty based on what are suspicious variables and unanswered questions.


    As for TV, a prime tool for misleading the public.

    For which part do you find the evidence insufficient:

    A) proving beyond all reasonable doubt that the official story is complete bunk;
    B) proving beyond all reasonable doubt that one of the alternative theories is correct?

    I can’t tell if you accept A but are not convinced about B, or if your doubts about B are causing you to also doubt A (which they definitely should NOT – the two questions are completely separate!)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @reiner Tor
    In Hungary the genius leftist-liberal government in the 1990s privatized most public utilities. So you get your electricity from E.ON, your water supply from Veolia Environnement, etc. Our first conservative government (not yet Fidesz) In 1993 sold our telephone monopoly to Deutsche Telekom. They immediately raised prices and “sold” the Hungarian subsidiary their own obsolete equipment which was due to be replaced in Germany anyway. Now the Hungarian customers paid for it anyway within a couple of years through higher prices, but now we’re paying them permanent dividends. They are now in the broadband internet provider monopoly business (in most areas there’s still very little competition, with either them or UPC, or sometimes some other firm), which could easily be done by a Hungarian owned company. Though at least cell phone service (where DT became also dominant due to its earlier presence in the telephone monopoly, when the mobile business was still insignificant) is the more important part (probably it needs a bigger company as owner due to economies of scale), but even here: I understand we needed foreigners to run the show, and I understand that the Germans are not worse than others, but please don’t turn this into a morality play of how they are supposed to “subsidize” us.

    Though a significant portion of the profit repatriations is now manufacturing. There’s nothing wrong with it: the big German firms like Daimler or Audi (Volkswagen) built huge factories and now repatriate some of the profits. This is mutually beneficial.

    What I don’t like so much is retail, telecom, etc., which are basically just windfalls for the foreign owners.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    So Betty Ong was the only person who identified an Israeli commando as one of the hijackers who shot people.

    No wonder the Israelis planted stories all over the internet that she didn’t exist.

    And most of the naive credulous internet “ researchers” on this site read those Israeli stories and believe she didn’t exist.

    That’s why I usually comment only about things I have personally done or seen or spoken with a person, such as my friend’s nephew who saw the planes crash into the towers from his Bay Ridge Brooklyn school.

    Betty Ong didn’t ever exist story was obviously planted all over the internet by the Israelis and the internet researcher fools fools believed it because they read it on the internet.

    Bingo. Expect the MSM to put a spotlight on this, or at least snopes or trash sites like The Daily Beast.

    I wonder if the Ong family will sue Alex Jones too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cold N. Holefield

    I wonder if the Ong family will sue Alex Jones too.
     
    That might be easier than getting the Saudi's to cough up. How come The Trumpster hasn't pushed for Justice for The 9/11 Victims' Families? Obama didn't either. Funny, that. Except it's not.

    The Saudi Elephant In The Room

    There's a reason The American Establishment is doing everything it can to prevent a Civil Lawsuit against Saudi Arabia. If such a suit went forward, it would Spill The Beans, and we can't have that, can we? Civil Lawsuits are much more lenient when it comes to evidence you can submit and the possibility exists that some of what we're discussing here will become a part of the Official Record. Perhaps the Saudis, rather than taking it on the Chin for The Gipper and paying, in their defense they expose The Truth about 9/11, or at least the component of The Truth that makes them look rather innocent compared to the Predominate Perpetrators/Predators.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @iffen
    Is there anything interesting in Armenia?

    Do they have a genocide museum?

    They do have some fabulous old Christian heritage stuff – really, really old churches and what not.

    Maybe they can appeal to religious tourists; they must have some places where old saints are buried and stuff.

    I know Turkey makes a killing off of people visiting cities Konya to check out the mausoleum and museum of Maulana Rumi (ra):

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Polish Perspective

    Poland, for example, receives around twice as much free money or aid from the EU, than the entire world UN annual budget. I guess Poland might be the most aid receiving country in the world? (I wonder if anyone has done calculations of this topic?)

     

    https://i.imgur.com/yNvMzzD.jpg

    Poland isn't even in the top 5 once you adjust for GNI. It's true that Poland gets most in absolute terms, but that's also because we are way bigger than most EE countries. I find a lot of economic innumerate to fail to understand this point and just repeat "yes but they get THIS MANY BILLIONS". But without adjusting for economic size is meaningless. Sad to see that you are not smarter than this, Dmitry.

    Also, this is counted from the year 2000. The latest EU funds flow constitute about 1% of our GNI according to our central bank. The next one will be half that, even if no change is done, simply on account of a growing economy and a closer realignment to the EU median.

    Furthermore, whenever we are talking about EU funds this should be kept in mind:

    https://i.imgur.com/YNiPO03.png

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge ("see, it's only thanks to us because of us generous we are!"). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.

    You can see this in sector after sector. Take retail. A German goes to shop in Aldi, Lidl or Kaufmann. All domestic firms. Poles and Czechs shop at the same stores, with Carrefour thrown into the mix. As you can see from the chart, the most drained country of us all is Czechia. No wonder euroskepticism is high there.

    And I haven't even talked about the fact that Western European countries benefit massively from labour and we lose, in some instances permanently.

    In Hungary the genius leftist-liberal government in the 1990s privatized most public utilities. So you get your electricity from E.ON, your water supply from Veolia Environnement, etc. Our first conservative government (not yet Fidesz) In 1993 sold our telephone monopoly to Deutsche Telekom. They immediately raised prices and “sold” the Hungarian subsidiary their own obsolete equipment which was due to be replaced in Germany anyway. Now the Hungarian customers paid for it anyway within a couple of years through higher prices, but now we’re paying them permanent dividends. They are now in the broadband internet provider monopoly business (in most areas there’s still very little competition, with either them or UPC, or sometimes some other firm), which could easily be done by a Hungarian owned company. Though at least cell phone service (where DT became also dominant due to its earlier presence in the telephone monopoly, when the mobile business was still insignificant) is the more important part (probably it needs a bigger company as owner due to economies of scale), but even here: I understand we needed foreigners to run the show, and I understand that the Germans are not worse than others, but please don’t turn this into a morality play of how they are supposed to “subsidize” us.

    Read More
    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    Though a significant portion of the profit repatriations is now manufacturing. There’s nothing wrong with it: the big German firms like Daimler or Audi (Volkswagen) built huge factories and now repatriate some of the profits. This is mutually beneficial.

    What I don’t like so much is retail, telecom, etc., which are basically just windfalls for the foreign owners.
    , @Polish Perspective

    I understand we needed foreigners to run the show
     
    There's a significant difference between taking in selective FDI in key industries and outright letting "foreigners run the show". East Asia and especially China did the former. Are you sure you are a nationalist?

    but please don’t turn this into a morality play of how they are supposed to “subsidize” us.
     
    My argument is much simpler. The West gains more from the East once you consider all three factors: public funds, private funds and labour movement. In the debate, we only hear about the first. We never hear about the last two.

    Therefore, the solution I prefer is clean and simple: we stop receiving public funds(literal pay-off money) and they stop getting free labour+monopolistic access to our domestic market. Don't forget that 75% of our EU funds are re-invested in Western European companies.

    The thing is, the West knows this. Günther Öttinger, who is in charge of cohesion funds has all but admitted this. There's a quote I'm too lazy to google where he says in half-jest that if anything the EU should pay EE countries more. But instead of that, my preferred option would achieve a far cleaner break. However, the West would also never agree to it, precisely because they know the real scorecard, which is why their threats of cutting EU funds during the asylum crisis was always a hoax.

    It's interesting, but perhaps not surprising, that Eastern Europeans like yourself have completely and whoolly swallowed the "you should be grateful" meme, while warning about "morality tales" when you aren't advocating for your own colonisation of "letting foreigners running the show".

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @for-the-record
    her ostensible family

    Someone has certainly gone to a lot of trouble to conjure out of nothing this "ostensible" family.

    Harry Ong, Sr. Passed away peacefully at home on Feb. 24, with his loving family by his side. Harry Sr., 86, was the beloved husband of Yee Gum Oy, and would have been married 59 years in March. Loving father to Harry Jr. and Dorothy Ong, Cathie Ann and Edward Herrera, Gloria Ann Ong-Woo, and Betty Ann Ong, [!!!] who predeceased him. Cherished grandfather to Dean and Kameron Joelson, Matthew Ong, Lauren Woo and Austin Woo. Also survived by many loving families and friends and will be greatly missed by all. Relatives and friends are cordially invited to attend a Visitation on March 9 from 6pm to 8pm, and Funeral on March 10 at 10am, both at the Tiffany Chapel at Cypress Lawn Funeral Home, 1370 El Camino Real, Colma, CA. Interment , Cypress Lawn Cemetery in Colma, CA. The family would also like to thank Dr. Bertrand Tuan and the wonderful staff of Pacific Hematology Oncology, San Francisco, CA. In lieu of flowers, donations would be sincerely appreciated for the Betty Ann Ong Foundation, P.O. Box 1108, Bakersfield, CA 93302.

    Published in San Francisco Chronicle from Mar. 4 to Mar. 5, 2007
     
    If Betty Ann Ong didn't exist, then none of these other people could exist either, since they all are (or were) in a position to confirm her existence.

    I’m sure it was a fake announcement. When people showed up for the visitation and funeral there were the crisis actors milling around pretend to be family and friends.

    The grand children are also crisis actors. The deception will be carried out unto the 4th generation when the crisis actor grandchildren reach an age to have their own children

    The corpse of course was a plastic mannequin.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @g2k
    Georgia has much more to offer tourists naturally, in particular it has a coastline and a slice of the greater Caucasus. The nunber one country of origin for Georgian tourists is Turkey which is a nonstarter for Armenia. Flights are also considerably cheaper into Georgia due to Pegasus and whizz. Armenia severed diplomatic relations with Hungary after they released an Azeri axe murderer, so no whizz flights. Pobeda fly to Gyumri though for about $30.

    Having said that, Georgia is now being bought out quite rapidly by Gulf Arabs and Turks. Last time I was there, quite a lot of restaurants were advertising halal meat; this was nonexistent just a year ago. This must be quite painful, given how nationalistic they are.

    Yerevan has an extremely highly developed service sector which is surprising given its size and poverty. They export a lot of food and luxury goods to Russia and there's some mining operations in the north.

    Having said that, Georgia is now being bought out quite rapidly by Gulf Arabs and Turks.

    Followed by…

    This must be quite painful, given how nationalistic they are.

    Major contradictions here; they can’t really be seriously nationalistic if they are selling off real-estate to Arabs and Turks, right? That certainly doesn’t fit together.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hyperborean
    Just because the people selling their country to the highest bidder only care about getting the highest price doesn't mean ordinary Georgians don't resent it.

    Considering how even in full-pozzed London I've heard ordinary people complain about all the foreign oligarchs buying up everything, I don't find it hard to believe that Georgians might find it painful.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Truth
    Yo revOO, you won.

    You had to apologize for what you said you were going to do to one of these NeoConscripts, instead you Doxed all of them AT THE SAME TIME.

    The official 9/11 story is not only patently absurd, but so incredibly ridiculous that I would have a hard time believing that anyone who believes it has an IQ over 70.

    They must be those LO-IQ White Nationalist Wiggers another poster is always talking about.

    (heh...heh...heh...)

    All the hasbarats come swarming to these conspiracy articles.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • @Fran Macadam
    One fiendish way to neutralize the good counsel of those against these wars, is to state all the many obvious and provable negative motives, properties and consequences of war - but then, sum up by blaming it on "The Joos."

    Are the conniving jooies and their kept goy boys pushing the ongoing destruction of the ME? If so, why not finger the vile jooies for being the bloodthirsty warmongers they are?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    So, basically you have nothing?

    I have more than you have, a man who lived in NYC and saw it happen.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Day

    I have more than you have, a man who lived in NYC and saw it happen.
     
    A friend of my mom’s who lives in Arlington, VA, called right after the news from the WTC was breaking, and smoke was coming from what the news thought was from the Capitol, and she was crying and told my mom that see just saw a plane fly into the Pentagon. I was there when my mom took the call.
    , @daniel le mouche
    Okay, I didn't see it happen live, but was in NY six months later and saw the still-smoldering crater. Indeed, I hereby confirm that the World Trade Center is no more. And big whoop. Who ever said otherwise?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @ploni almoni
    At least ten or fifteen people saw airplanes hit the buildings. There are even videos of planes hitting the buildings. And it was on live TV. Why do you make a big deal of some one in Brooklyn in a schoolyard see a plane hit the building? Yes you can see Manhattan from Brooklyn. So What? What does that prove? It was on television. Is that not enough for you?

    Because Sparkon denies the towers fell despite various people present in Manhattan or across the river in Brooklyn seeing the planes crash into the buildings.

    It’s not just this thread. Many times over the years someone posts that he or she was in Manhattan that day and saw the planes and the towers fall.

    Sparkon always jumps in and claims the poster didn’t see anything and nothing happened in Manhattan that day.

    He or she only believes what he or she reads in the internet. That’s why I mentioned the man who saw the event happening across the river from his Brooklyn school.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Disordered thoughts on the National Cockatoo’s latest antics. One: The aghastment and horrilation about the terrible, appalling, shocking etc nature of gas warfare is nonsense. There is nothing unusually hideous about the use of toxic chemicals. Hideous, yes, but not unusually hideous. Boring old workaday artillery, that nobody criticizes, leaves children watching as mommy frantically...
  • @Pat Kittle
    Saddam was falsely accused of (specified) "WMD's" -- AND killing Kuwaiti babies.

    But most of all, Saddam was the "New Hitler!!" -- so we urgently had to save the poor Jews from another Holocau$t.

    Without missing a beat, Qaddafi became the next "New Hitler!!"

    And now Assad is the "New Hitler!!"

    "New Hitlers!!" everywhere, it seems -- everywhere Israel orders the goyim to fight its wars.

    Ahmadinejad was the "New Hitler!!"

    Rouhani is the new "New Hitler!!"

    Kim Song Un is the "New Hitler!!"

    Putin is the "New Hitler!!"

    Oy, it's anudda Shoah!!

    Please do us all a favour and rememeber to take your meds tommorow

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @SunBakedSuburb
    "... Russia and China have adult leadership."

    They are also non-democratic, authoritarian regimes.

    "By contrast, Trump is a loon, ignorant of practically everything, mentally chaotic, and easily modified."

    That's all true, especially the last bit. But give the Orange One some credit: he was a wrecking ball to the stagnant, hideous Clinton and Bush dynasties. He has also driven the DC establishment and media insane. Pure schadenfreude.

    Yup, regardless of what Trump does or doesn’t do, he has completely outed the globalist cabal and uniparty system.

    To be honest I’m not sure that he even knew why he had such a following. He does not seem like the most thoughtful man. He saw the crowds with thousands of Americans cheering his message, so he kept repeating it. He might not have seen himself in the same way that we “conspiracy theorists” did. So he’s confused and doesn’t see how he’s letting us down.

    Trump did the first bit, and quite frankly it’s up to the people whether or not our society will survive. Trump was a great push through the barriers, and it’s up to us to continue.

    Read More
    • Agree: Bill Jones
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • If Ron Und has $10,000 burning his pocket instead of paying the lazy bum Revusky he could hire a PI to do the research on Betty Ong by getting vital records of Betty Ong and interview some real people and do what Revusky, the great believer in crisis actors and non-existent people never intended to do.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    the lazy bum Revusky
     
    Utu, you pathetic dumbass... by your logic, if you took your car to a mechanic specifically for an oil change, and he did just that, changed the oil, he would be a "lazy bum" because he did not take the opportunity to rebuild your car's engine!

    The wager with Unz was specifically about whether Betty Ong was in the appropriate high school yearbook. To say that I'm lazy because I resolved that question and didn't go further makes no sense really.

    Now, granted, as the scriptures say, out of the mouths of dumbasses can come words of wisdom, so you do make a valid point about hiring a private investigator. Assuming one really did want to resolve the Betty Ong question thoroughly, I guess that is what one would do -- as opposed to insisting that I, somebody who is not any sort of professional investigator, do it.

    So, yes, I would be perfectly happy if Ron hired a PI to do just that. However, he really ought to pay off on this wager to me first.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • The purpose of all wars, is peace. So observed St. Augustine early in the first millennium A.D. Far be it from me to disagree with the esteemed Bishop of Hippo, but his crisply formulated aphorism just might require a bit of updating. I’m not a saint or even a bishop, merely an interested observer of...
  • we count on these less affluent Americans to volunteer for military service

    Mondoweiss had an interesting piece recently stating that Baptists, Catholics, LDS contribute the highest personnel numbers –percentage wise– to the Armed Services. While Methodists, Congregationalists, Jews the fewest. Even Muslims have a greater percentage than Jews (surprising…no).

    The point is that in as long as educational benefits, medical care (for life) and a notion of service as a noble calling continue to be valued by a significant portion of the poor/lower middle class, the wealthiest among us will have numbers to project militarily. And it won’t be from their families.

    Read More
    • Agree: jacques sheete
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The Deep State/ziocons were very smart to create a deification of the military in the past decades. So the American public would cheer on wars and occupations and endless global military expansion. We went from the grass-roots anti-war invective “Baby killers!” to the Fox News slogan, “Thank you for your service!”
    , @Almost Missouri
    It was over ten years ago, and it said Buddhists were more represented than Jews, not Muslims. Muslims are as underrepresented as other overclass religions.

    http://mondoweiss.net/2006/08/the_true_defini/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @German_reader
    If you google for Betty Ong, you find this

    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/22128600/harry-ong

    and this

    https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Betty-Ong-s-family-remembers-2310213.php

    (and probably much more, I only looked for about a minute or so).

    On these two sites you find several fully named supposed close relatives of Betty Ong, and info that her parents owned a grocery store on Jackson Street in San Francisco.
    Now I don't want to encourage an obnoxious nutcase like Revusky to pester the relatives of a dead woman, but unless he can prove that these people are all fake and invented too, his research about 40-year old high school yearbooks is pretty worthless imo.

    Somehow I knew (((German_reader))) would make an appearance on this thread.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    No he is just a good German on the cuck side . He probably is not ((()))).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Polish Perspective

    Poland, for example, receives around twice as much free money or aid from the EU, than the entire world UN annual budget. I guess Poland might be the most aid receiving country in the world? (I wonder if anyone has done calculations of this topic?)

     

    https://i.imgur.com/yNvMzzD.jpg

    Poland isn't even in the top 5 once you adjust for GNI. It's true that Poland gets most in absolute terms, but that's also because we are way bigger than most EE countries. I find a lot of economic innumerate to fail to understand this point and just repeat "yes but they get THIS MANY BILLIONS". But without adjusting for economic size is meaningless. Sad to see that you are not smarter than this, Dmitry.

    Also, this is counted from the year 2000. The latest EU funds flow constitute about 1% of our GNI according to our central bank. The next one will be half that, even if no change is done, simply on account of a growing economy and a closer realignment to the EU median.

    Furthermore, whenever we are talking about EU funds this should be kept in mind:

    https://i.imgur.com/YNiPO03.png

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge ("see, it's only thanks to us because of us generous we are!"). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.

    You can see this in sector after sector. Take retail. A German goes to shop in Aldi, Lidl or Kaufmann. All domestic firms. Poles and Czechs shop at the same stores, with Carrefour thrown into the mix. As you can see from the chart, the most drained country of us all is Czechia. No wonder euroskepticism is high there.

    And I haven't even talked about the fact that Western European countries benefit massively from labour and we lose, in some instances permanently.

    Speaking of EU funds.

    EU budget revamp set to shift funds to southern states

    As can be seen from the chart above, Greece has benefited more than Poland on a total basis since 2000. Their GDP per capita (PPP-adjusted) is also lower than Poland’s. It’s a bottomless pit.

    A quote from the article:

    Brussels wants to end the practice of distributing cohesion money almost exclusively on the basis of gross domestic product per head, replacing it with much broader criteria covering everything from youth unemployment, education and the environment to migration and innovation.
    On top of revising the allocation of funds, the commission is reinforcing conditions on eligibility, including rule of law compliance, and applying more restrictions on how the EU money can be used.

    That means: take more refugees and accept Soros influence, or else.

    Also, the article goes on the misleading nonsense of talking in absolute nominal values, the same mistake Dmitry does. Difference is that Dmitry is just ignorant, these people do it because they count on the fact that most of their readers are innumerate and won’t critically ask “okay, but what about adjusted to GNI as a percentage” or even “what about per capita”. We’re not even in the top 5 on both of these as of now and we’ll get even less after this.

    What this means, in effect, is that there will be even fewer motivations to heed what Brussels says, freeing up our hands even more. Not just on migration but even on things like taxing foreign retail (which is almost completely colonised by Western European firms), which has been resulted in autistic screeching from Brussels whenever we broached the subject.

    The threat of “what about FDI” is no longer as powerful either. FDI is still needed but far less than 15-20 years ago. Back then even basic FDI was required. Today we can do most stuff ourselves with only specialised FDI needed and you don’t even need EU firms for that. The investments into battery manufacturing supply chain is done by South Korean firms, for instance, in both Poland and Hungary.

    Ultimately it had to come to this and better sooner than later.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • How do regular Sunnis see this? A success, a failure or what?

    I cannot arrogate myself to speak on behalf of all Sunnis. I can only speak of the ones I am most familiar with – traditional ones and even more moderate minded ones are not happy with Saudi, that’s being generous. Saudi has not only helped destroy Syria but has caused a humanitarian crisis in Yemen.

    That said, I don’t know of a single Sunni in my circle who likes the Assad regime. Many of them, like myself feel his saving grace is that the people who would replace him after the civil war are even worse.

    My personal go to person on these matters is Shaykh Muhammad Yaqoubi who is a traditional scholar (and Sufi shaykh) in exile in Moroccco. He is very out-spoken about the damage done by Saudis to the Muslim world, yet is also against the Assad regime. He spoke out against the regime early on and had to leave the country, however – as early as 2015 he was stating publicly; ” continuing the fight is no longer in the interest of Syrians.”

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Thus, the way I see it (based on his opinion and the various comments I see from Sunni Muslims); the fighting needs should stop as soon as it can and a political solution needs to be arrived at with the major players at the table; including people who have a serious stake in the matter like Iran, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, Jordan, etc.
     
    Thanks for your informed opinion. These things are not so clear looking from the outside, and Western reporting seems to be mostly useless.

    So the problem are the Israelis/US/Saudis who are pushing wars more than the Sunnis or Shias themselves.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    It's true there is a brain-drain of the poorer countries, as well as many young people leaving to work, and expansion of markets for richer, old members' companies.

    So indeed, there is benefit to business elites in the old member countries, and loss for some of the new countries.

    But for the standard taxpayers, there is a complete inversion, where the money of taxpayers in richer countries, is simply transferred to poorer countries (for 'structural adjustment funds').

    Poland, for example, receives around twice as much free money or aid from the EU, than the entire world UN annual budget. I guess Poland might be the most aid receiving country in the world? (I wonder if anyone has done calculations of this topic?)

    The amount of free aid money Poland gets is surely lucky for them, even if they have lost a lot of workers to brain-drain .

    The money they receive from EU each year, is equivalent to what large oil exporting countries can earn.

    https://msp.gov.pl/en/polish-economy/economic-news/4015,Poland-to-get-nearly-EUR-106-bln-from-2014-2020-EU-budget-pool-expected-impact-o.html

    Bulgaria does not receive even close in terms of money, so it is clear to say that the distribution system of the aid money is not balanced across the new members.

    Kiev was looking at Poland, and dreaming of this kind of wealth transfer (but of course it will not happen for Ukraine, and if it did, the funds would be lost rapidly to corruption).

    Poland, for example, receives around twice as much free money or aid from the EU, than the entire world UN annual budget. I guess Poland might be the most aid receiving country in the world? (I wonder if anyone has done calculations of this topic?)


    Poland isn’t even in the top 5 once you adjust for GNI. It’s true that Poland gets most in absolute terms, but that’s also because we are way bigger than most EE countries. I find a lot of economic innumerate to fail to understand this point and just repeat “yes but they get THIS MANY BILLIONS”. But without adjusting for economic size is meaningless. Sad to see that you are not smarter than this, Dmitry.

    Also, this is counted from the year 2000. The latest EU funds flow constitute about 1% of our GNI according to our central bank. The next one will be half that, even if no change is done, simply on account of a growing economy and a closer realignment to the EU median.

    Furthermore, whenever we are talking about EU funds this should be kept in mind:

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge (“see, it’s only thanks to us because of us generous we are!”). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.

    You can see this in sector after sector. Take retail. A German goes to shop in Aldi, Lidl or Kaufmann. All domestic firms. Poles and Czechs shop at the same stores, with Carrefour thrown into the mix. As you can see from the chart, the most drained country of us all is Czechia. No wonder euroskepticism is high there.

    And I haven’t even talked about the fact that Western European countries benefit massively from labour and we lose, in some instances permanently.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Polish Perspective
    Speaking of EU funds.

    EU budget revamp set to shift funds to southern states

    As can be seen from the chart above, Greece has benefited more than Poland on a total basis since 2000. Their GDP per capita (PPP-adjusted) is also lower than Poland's. It's a bottomless pit.

    A quote from the article:

    Brussels wants to end the practice of distributing cohesion money almost exclusively on the basis of gross domestic product per head, replacing it with much broader criteria covering everything from youth unemployment, education and the environment to migration and innovation.
    On top of revising the allocation of funds, the commission is reinforcing conditions on eligibility, including rule of law compliance, and applying more restrictions on how the EU money can be used.
     

    That means: take more refugees and accept Soros influence, or else.

    Also, the article goes on the misleading nonsense of talking in absolute nominal values, the same mistake Dmitry does. Difference is that Dmitry is just ignorant, these people do it because they count on the fact that most of their readers are innumerate and won't critically ask "okay, but what about adjusted to GNI as a percentage" or even "what about per capita". We're not even in the top 5 on both of these as of now and we'll get even less after this.

    What this means, in effect, is that there will be even fewer motivations to heed what Brussels says, freeing up our hands even more. Not just on migration but even on things like taxing foreign retail (which is almost completely colonised by Western European firms), which has been resulted in autistic screeching from Brussels whenever we broached the subject.

    The threat of "what about FDI" is no longer as powerful either. FDI is still needed but far less than 15-20 years ago. Back then even basic FDI was required. Today we can do most stuff ourselves with only specialised FDI needed and you don't even need EU firms for that. The investments into battery manufacturing supply chain is done by South Korean firms, for instance, in both Poland and Hungary.

    Ultimately it had to come to this and better sooner than later.

    , @reiner Tor
    In Hungary the genius leftist-liberal government in the 1990s privatized most public utilities. So you get your electricity from E.ON, your water supply from Veolia Environnement, etc. Our first conservative government (not yet Fidesz) In 1993 sold our telephone monopoly to Deutsche Telekom. They immediately raised prices and “sold” the Hungarian subsidiary their own obsolete equipment which was due to be replaced in Germany anyway. Now the Hungarian customers paid for it anyway within a couple of years through higher prices, but now we’re paying them permanent dividends. They are now in the broadband internet provider monopoly business (in most areas there’s still very little competition, with either them or UPC, or sometimes some other firm), which could easily be done by a Hungarian owned company. Though at least cell phone service (where DT became also dominant due to its earlier presence in the telephone monopoly, when the mobile business was still insignificant) is the more important part (probably it needs a bigger company as owner due to economies of scale), but even here: I understand we needed foreigners to run the show, and I understand that the Germans are not worse than others, but please don’t turn this into a morality play of how they are supposed to “subsidize” us.
    , @Frederic Bastiat

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge (“see, it’s only thanks to us because of us generous we are!”). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.
     
    FDI was 176 Billion in 2016. Polish GDP was 469 Billion.

    https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/foreign-direct-investment
    https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/gdp

    , @Dmitry
    There's nothing ignorant in noting that Poland has received more of the aid than any of the countries.

    You can interpret this how you like, or complain that it still hasn't received the most in per capita terms. The country/economy has the received most, and the numbers are amazing.

    But if Ukraine thinks they can repeat the story in the future, it is going to be heavily disappointed.
    , @Thorfinnsson

    https://i.imgur.com/YNiPO03.png

    People only look at public fund flows, because it gives Western Europeans a moral edge (“see, it’s only thanks to us because of us generous we are!”). In reality, you should count both public and private flows. Once you do that, EE countries are being drained of capital on a net basis.

     

    You are correct, but the chart doesn't show that. It's quite misleading.

    In only compares the net inflow of EU transfers to the net outflow of capital income.

    Other inflows include:

    • FDI (FDI into Poland for 2016 was around 3% of GDP it appears--more than EU transfers)
    • Exports
    • Foreign portfolio investment (i.e. investment into a business short of direct control, as well as bond purchases)
    • Bank lending
    • Repatriated foreign earnings and debt repayments

    Other outflows include:

    • Outbound FDI
    • Imports
    • Outbound foreign portfolio investment
    • Outbound bank lending
    • Foreign aid

    In theory the capital (FDI, portfolio investment, lending) and current accounts (trade, debt service, repatriated earnings) must always balance, though in reality this isn't always true (see the Eurodollar market for instance).

    Depending on what EU funds are actually used for they could represent a very good deal in that EU funds do not represent FDI, portfolio investment, or lending and thus involve no obligation to service foreign debt or send capital income to foreign investors. Knowing the EU I doubt the funds are used for anything useful but you would know better.

    In general outside of East Asia fast-growing and/or converging economies run current account deficits in order to grow faster. Norway for instance ran a current account deficit of 13% of GDP while it was getting its North Sea oil industry off the ground.

    If you want to avoid that you have to suppress consumption and increase domestic saving, hence the famously high household savings rate in China (and Japan until recently). Or you accept slower growth. Inbound FDI also makes it easier to acquire foreign technology and know-how.

    A good way to split the difference is through joint ventures and forced technology transfers.

    You can see this in sector after sector. Take retail. A German goes to shop in Aldi, Lidl or Kaufmann. All domestic firms. Poles and Czechs shop at the same stores, with Carrefour thrown into the mix. As you can see from the chart, the most drained country of us all is Czechia. No wonder euroskepticism is high there.
     

    Sure, but ALDI, Lidl, Kaufmann, and Carrefour doubtless have higher productivity and better merchandising skills than anything that existed in the Visegrad 4 or could've come to the fore in the post-communist period.

    As a result Visegrad people exchange lost profits for lower prices, better quality, and improved product selection.

    Of course you can argue that efficient retailers would've developed anyway, but this surely would've taken more time.

    The real question is whether the Visegrad 4 can create successful multinational corporations or if they will forever be comprador economies controlled by the German 1%. There are worse fates than that incidentally. Australia and Canada have been a comprador economies from day one for instance.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @seeing-thru
    If only the people living under "regimes" in all countries, big or small, powerful or weak, could put in place laws to screen all politicians for (a) basic sanity (mandatory sanity testing); (b) basic honesty (mandatory anti-crookedness testing); and (c) basic truthfulness (mandatory truth-serum testing) all problems of war and peace will be solved.

    Now why does my mind keep wandering off into utopian territories knowing fully well that no politician anywhere will pass all the three tests? So let us sit back and enjoy the games of Russian Roulette. Hell, if we bet and get the bet right we may even make a lot of money!

    I don’t believe the solution for a better world is more laws, better laws.
    We will never have a better world until people understand that the only thing one can change is oneself. The only revolution worth talking about and doing is the one one does with oneself.
    The only growth which has any meaning is “spiritual growth”. – Soljenitsyne.
    With laws you can get everything. Even the hell: Communism, Nazism, Capitalism, were and are legal.
    All Americans wars (mass murder) were and are legal.

    “Now why does my mind keep wandering off into utopian territories ?”

    Our thoughts are important.

    I would suggest you to read a masterpiece – ISLAND ( Aldous Huxley). It’s about “utopian territories”.
    “Island” should be mandatory reading in all countries. That of course won’t happen.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anonymous
    Do you actually know anything about law and practice wrt names in America or any country or are you just waffling?

    Surnames or given names?..And don't forget the regular surnames of today are quite recent compared with the antiquity of even the Common Law.

    If it isn't a crime what's to stop people using multiple names, as they do? Indeed many criminals have been known to use a dozen names. How many have you heard of bring prosecuted for doing that?

    If you end up realising that the law enters into it only if there is a specific statute or regulation or fiddling with names is an ingredient in a crime of fraud you may wonder why you think you have found a problem which affects the probability of Betty Ong and Betty Ng being one and the same person.

    In most American states, and many European and S American countries it is not a crime to use a false name.

    It’s only a crime to use a false name for fraud or to assist in committing any kind of crime.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @KenH

    And what happens when the majority of whites in those nations directly oppose the Alt Right’s jackboots of nationalism for only white people?
     
    And how about the left's jackbooted fascism that holds that America belongs to every racial group except whites and especially whites who don't hate themselves? How come you never speak out against that bigotry? Hint: because to you and other lefties that's a righteous and noble hate and bigotry.

    Do not these whites have the freedom to association to include non-whites as being “their own people” and “one of them”?
     
    If you put your thinking cap on you'd see that most of the diversity worshipping white and (((white))) leftists you look to for guidance live in whitetopias and rarely choose to associate with non-whites. Somehow I doubt most of these people will freely choose to live in the equivalent of Detroit or San Paulo, Brazil, but if that's what you all wish then more power to you and them if you're really true believers in the cult of "muh diversity".

    I would venture you fortunately lack the guile and gumption to engage in such action. St. Breivik, you are not.
     
    According to what your crystal ball? I'll do what is necessary to protect me, my friends and family and my people. I don't need to beat my chest and act tough or tell you what my plans are. I'd venture that if and when that day ever comes the prospect of tens of thousands of heavily armed and pissed off white men will give you and other lefties the worst case of diarrhea in history.

    Indeed, in this context, Patrick is right when he says “as we have ceased to be a moral and religious people”.
     
    Are you auditioning for the late Rev. Billy Graham's job?

    “And how about the left’s jackbooted fascism that holds that America belongs to every racial group except whites…”

    Which is patently false. First, you are absolutely misapplying the concept “fascism” here, which means “a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and control of industry and commerce.” The United States is not a fascist government, contrary to your tinfoil hattery. Second, America doesn’t “belong” to any one racial or ethnic group. It consists of citizens, including whites, who have not been excluded in being part of the body politic or social fabric. You have a knack for wild generalizations. Third, whites have every liberty to form their own groups. It is just that not all white people are on board with the groups that YOU want to form or be part of. Which is their freedom of association to oppose.

    “and especially whites who don’t hate themselves?”

    In your world, whites hate themselves only if they do not conform to your belief system. Which, if you truly think about it, is ridiculous. White Americans are not monolithic. They belong to a number of groups, and love their membership in those groups. They need not be virtue signaled to death by your insistence that they only love themselves if they look out for all whites.

    “How come you never speak out against that bigotry? Hint: because to you and other lefties that’s a righteous and noble hate and bigotry.”

    Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture. Again, do whites have the freedom of association to choose to include non-whites in their groups, and to marry and procreate with those groups? Why or why not?

    “If you put your thinking cap on you’d see that most of the diversity worshipping white and (((white))) leftists you look to for guidance live in whitetopias and rarely choose to associate with non-whites.”

    It is a matter of economics here, not race. Upper-class people want to live in nice places, regardless of race or ethnicity. That is their liberty. It is reasonable and sensible for well-off folks to live in well-off places next to people who are also well-off. Again, it’s about finances. Moreover, white people who live in such areas interact with non-whites on a day to day basis, whether it be at work or at play. You either don’t see it, or if you do see it, you don’t want to see it.

    “Somehow I doubt most of these people will freely choose to live in the equivalent of Detroit or San Paulo, Brazil, but if that’s what you all wish then more power to you and them if you’re really true believers in the cult of “muh diversity”.”

    There is no cult here of diversity, just people from different races and ethnicities who choose to interact with one another. That is called being human.

    Now, regarding Detroit, there are a host of reasons for the downfall of that city other than racial matters. Would you like to know more, citizen, and become educated on the matter?

    According to what your crystal ball? I’ll do what is necessary to protect me, my friends and family and my people.”

    Your people are white Americans, which includes me.

    “I’d venture that if and when that day ever comes the prospect of tens of thousands of heavily armed and pissed off white men will give you and other lefties the worst case of diarrhea in history.”

    That is all fantasy, my friend. If there is this invasion that already has taken place in the States, and whites are about to become extinct, you choosing not to lift a finger now to do something about it tells me everything I need to know.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    " ... whites have every liberty to form their own groups. "

    Not really. If a group of whites publicly professed in-group preference and wanted to coalesce around identitarian issues, white sjw Stalinists would move quickly, primarily on social media, to stigmatize such a group. Especially if said group was more serious than Richard Spencer's cavalcade of gay Nazi camp.

    "Because it is not bigotry for white people to make their own decisions about race and culture."

    I will assume you're being sincere: Apparently, you don't follow trends. The societal mantra, especially for whites, is to accept enforced diversity without complaint or be doxxed, which will be followed by economic marginalization.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Everyone on board the Liberty would have been killed if the crew hadn’t managed to improvise an antenna and send a wide enough distress signal. The Liberty event shows that these things sometimes do go wrong but with enough friends in high places, suppression can still succeed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • TL;DR;BS!

    1) The new national anthum of (Alawite-Kurdish) Syria will be written by Acmed Scott Key (…..rockets red glare….),

    2) The Alliance of the Willing, but reluctant, without any annoying text, was approved by the signatures of fire in the sky (look at a map) (Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Israel, Egypt (?), U.K., France, U.S.),

    3) Rodina (Mother Russia) gets to declare victory over ISIS and gets to building their new warm-water naval base,

    4) The contract for the joint Saudi, Persian, Kurdish (Syrian), European pipeline has probably already been inked (all beaks will be wet),

    5) The Ottoman theme park in northern Syria will be under new management,

    6) Divine Punishment for doing exactly what was planned?, without the “Anglos”, “Honkies”, “Normies”, etc. you’all’d be sleeping in the mud with the pigs and killing each other with clubs. I am just hoping that we are on the call-up list for the next inning, especially the Scots, so I can see what comes after stills and steam engines,

    7) Back to the vodka and beach umbrella.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anon
    Losing track of you would be like losing track of an elderly rhinoceros stumbling blindly through the swamp.

    Apparently it’s break time and the interns have been brought in.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of Orban's campaign was uber-globalist George Soros. And Orban's commitments were to halt any further surrenders of Hungarian sovereignty and independence...
  • @dfordoom

    In this context the French revolution was a reaction against excessive taxation and their exploitative aristocracy.
     
    I think you may be making the mistake of seeing the French Revolution as a spontaneous uprising of the oppressed masses. Most of the revolutions of the 17th and 18th centuries were uprisings of the increasingly powerful and wealthy middle classes who weren't exploited or oppressed but who saw the chance of looting the aristocracy. The poor old huddled masses usually weren't consulted and were either exploited by the revolutionaries or were hostile to the revolution.

    It's usually not the genuinely downtrodden who revolt. It's usually a rising new elite trying to displace the old elite.

    I think you may be making the mistake of seeing the French Revolution as a spontaneous uprising of the oppressed masses. Most of the revolutions of the 17th and 18th centuries were uprisings of the increasingly powerful and wealthy middle classes who weren’t exploited or oppressed but who saw the chance of looting the aristocracy.

    Who was looting who? As background, my view is that aristocracies have to earn their position a national leaders. Early on it was quite straightforward, and usually on the battlefield, for example John Churchill, the 1st Duke of Marlborough:

    His leadership of the allied armies consolidated Britain’s emergence as a front-rank power. He successfully maintained unity among the allies, thereby demonstrating his diplomatic skills. Throughout ten consecutive campaigns during the Spanish Succession war, Marlborough held together a discordant coalition through his sheer force of personality and raised the standing of British arms to a level not known since the Middle Ages. Although in the end he could not compel total capitulation from his enemies, his victories allowed Britain to rise from a minor to a major power, ensuring the country’s growing prosperity throughout the 18th century.

    Wikipedia.

    But by the “Belle Epoque” 1871-1914 European aristocracies were a useless decadent elite.

    I would connect the rise in power of the commercial middle classes and industrialists to the Industrial Revolution. They were contributing more and wanted political power, and they got it through their money and democracy (actually allied with the old aristocracy) with the downside of the not so welcome growth of a politically aware working class.

    For me this was the start of a classic problem that still hasn’t been resolved. The commercial and industrial elite should be the new aristocracy on grounds of wealth, power and influence, but they are motivated by the desire for private profit and will manipulate the state to enrich themselves. Classic 21st century USA.

    The French revolution set the scene, and was somewhat earlier 1789 – 1799, but it’s a fact that all French non-aristocratic classes were exploited and oppressed through excessive taxation – and I would accept the consensus that this triggered the revolution.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Churchill of Marlborough was a snake. A remarkably talented snake, but still a snake.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Anonymous[249] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon
    Jonathan, if you really want to pursue this I have a few thoughts.

    They don’t come from the internet they come from an original source, me.

    Like non existent Betty Ong and her crisis actor siblings I’m born, raised and lived most of my life in San Francisco.

    So I don’t need google maps or any other internet source.

    Like most people on this site, I picked up somewhere that Betty Ong went to George Washington High on 32nd Avenue a couple blocks from Geary in the outer Richmond district of San Francisco. I lived less than a mile north of that school.

    I assumed that because she went to Washington she and her family lived in the outer Richmond.

    I just read the Wikipedia entry. It says she grew up in Chinatown. Now, Chinatown is about 5 miles from Washington High. And whether by car or bus it’s a ghastly trip. By car it takes a good hour during week day traffic.

    To get there by bus it would involve 2 buses and a cable car. It would take an hour or more twice a day. After the cable car she would have to wait at the Geary st bus stop.

    It’s horrible, especially when it rains. Picture 50 people trying to crowd unto the Geary st bus. Then the horrible crowded awful bus that goes about 5 miles an hour till it gets west of Van Ness.

    Now, why would she or her parents want her to waste 2 to 3 hours a day to go to a perfectly ordinary average public high school when there is an ordinary public school, Galileo right in Chinatown?

    If her parents sent her to Mercy SF or St Rose or Lick-Wilmerding or another private school in western SF the horrible commute would be worth it.

    But to go to Washington? Unless it was a forced bussing thing.
    Someone found a Gloria Ong graduated 1972 from Galileo the Chinatown high school. That’s the right name and age of the sister.

    Revulsky found an inter net Washington yearbook and the only Betty Ong was black.

    There are about 75 private and public high schools in SF. St Rose closed after the 1989 earthquake. Many of the private schools opened after Betty Ong was high school age. Does anyone want to search all those schools? Not me

    Go ahead Sparkon, use your wonderful google skills and tell me how I am wrong about how to to get from Chinatown to the outer Richmond.

    Your pontificating about cities you’ve never been to is ridiculous. You should be embarrassed

    I picked up somewhere that Betty Ong went to George Washington High on 32nd Avenue

    Perhaps someone decided after the fact to connect Betty Ong with the WRONG high school as a diversionary psyop, and created “supporting” material to keep this diversion afloat as long as possible.

    Since a considerable number of people actually died on 9/11, it is not clear why someone would have to invent a FICTITIOUS individual to hang the phone dialogues on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    The fiction has to be contrived prior to the actual event taking place so that media can all parrot the same lines and how the BBC came to report the collapse of WTC7 prior to its actual collapse. This is also why media announces the names and pictures of the so called perpetrators long before any real investigation has commenced and, more importantly, to derail any inconvenient facts that might emerge prior to the entire media being corralled.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia - and numbers are probably higher considering the situation with illegal and undocumented immigrants.

    As for emigration rate, the majority come to Russia on work permits. However, if we look just at the minority that successfully obtain Russian citizenship - almost 1% of the total population in Armenia obtains Russian citizenship each year.

    {There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia }

    How do you know this?
    Where did you get that number from?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    It was 3 million - two years ago.

    https://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2528568

    By now the figure will be over 3 million, into the customs union.

    https://regnum.ru/news/2316978.html
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Dmitry
    There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia - and numbers are probably higher considering the situation with illegal and undocumented immigrants.

    As for emigration rate, the majority come to Russia on work permits. However, if we look just at the minority that successfully obtain Russian citizenship - almost 1% of the total population in Armenia obtains Russian citizenship each year.

    As for emigration rate, the majority come to Russia on work permits.

    Actually now with the Customs Unions since 2015, they don’t even need to buy a work permit to come to Russia, and the purpose of their unlimited entry and exit to the country does not have to be recorded.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Art Deco
    The best solution for a significant proportion – especially young people, who want a job where they can afford a normal life.

    People's sense of both 'normal life' and what they 'can afford' is derived from the context they're used to. The country has a depressed labor market, but the outmigration rate peaked in 1995 and is now as low as it has been in 30-odd years (0.2% of the population per annum).



    There are probably as many, ,or more, Armenians in Russia at any single time, than in Armenia.

    The last census found 1.2 million Armenians in Russia, v. 2.9 million in Armenia.

    There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia – and numbers are probably higher considering the situation with illegal and undocumented immigrants.

    As for emigration rate, the majority come to Russia on work permits. However, if we look just at the minority that successfully obtain Russian citizenship – almost 1% of the total population in Armenia obtains Russian citizenship each year.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dmitry

    As for emigration rate, the majority come to Russia on work permits.
     
    Actually now with the Customs Unions since 2015, they don't even need to buy a work permit to come to Russia, and the purpose of their unlimited entry and exit to the country does not have to be recorded.
    , @Avery
    {There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia }

    How do you know this?
    Where did you get that number from?
    , @Art Deco
    There are over 3 million Armenians at any time in Russia –

    Known to you, but not to Russian census enumerators.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @Seamus Day

    Sen. Gardner Calls for State Dept. to Look Into Labeling Russia as State Sponsor of Terror

    http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/04/17/cory-gardner-suggests-probing-russia-state-sponsored-terror
     

    Don’t you love it, these ziocons who have been supporting AQ/ISIS jihadis in Syria, and Israel who has been supporting AQ/ISIS jihadis in Syria, are now going to accuse Russia, who has been decimating jihadis and ISIS in Syria, of supporting terrorists?? What evil friggin SOBs these ziocon operatives like Cory Gardner and Nikki Haley are.

    ziocons… AQ/ISIS jihadis… Israel…

    Implying that normal white people are oh-so peace loving? Deceit of the white mind.

    The current rise of the Jihadis was primarily due to the evil of the western civilisation (when every one of you enjoys the spoils of that evil, every one of you is culpable for that evil).

    To be sure, those who fight and die against the armed enemies of Islam, refraining from transgressing the limits of just war, they are the blessed, the martyrs. Every other “jihadist” can go to hell.

    What requires decimation is the hegemony of the western civilisation, if required through self-”genocide” (see post above), and their implanted cancer in Islamic lands.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Anonymous
    But - to be relevant - what do you say about the specific subject of criticism?

    You said that Erebus had a third class mind. I responded that I disagreed and stated that his comment history proved otherwise and was there for anyone to see while yours is not. Your crude insult reveals that it is you who has the third class mind. You also seem to be assailing the concept of Betty Ong being a fictional character, whereas I would assert that much, if not most of the entire narrative surrounding 9/11 is indeed a fiction and the lack of the usual substance surrounding the life of Betty Ong is indeed suspicious.

    Read More
    • Agree: Rurik
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Indeed, it is worth reading, for Hamilton’s statements make clear he is nothing but a shill. Perhaps you are right that he cannot be portrayed as a 9-11 skeptic, but he is surely no asset for believers in the official storyline. At any rate, there is little doubt that the resources allocated to his investigation were meager in light of the event they were intended to cover.

    BTW, which of the anonymous assholes are you? I’ve lost track.

    Losing track of you would be like losing track of an elderly rhinoceros stumbling blindly through the swamp.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Apparently it’s break time and the interns have been brought in.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Frankie P
    Jonathan Revusky,

    Did you make the apology in a personal correspondence? If so, why? The threat to dox him was public, why isn't the apology also public?

    Frankie P

    If our good host Run Unz is satisfied, you should be as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    If our good host Run Unz is satisfied, you should be as well.
     
    I've finally had an opportunity to catch up a bit with my favorite website.

    Have not yet read all the comments, but figured I'd chime in here just to say that the issue between JR and I was resolved long ago, (at least on my end), but I'm sure Mr. Unz wanted to make the point that threatening to dox the participants to his phenomenal webzine is unacceptable.

    I think we're all indebted to Ron Unz for providing this oasis of free though and expression, (in an otherwise mundane and mendacious world), so I'm just repeating my gratitude to Mr. Unz, and for creating and maintaining and making his remarkable site available to us all. And I'm glad to see the distraction laid to rest.

    As to the article, there were some gems..

    ".. a very nice person, with exceptionally good body hygiene"

    "..don’t amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world."

    and a general kudos to the author for his tenacity.

    9/11 was an inside job. Conceived by Straussian, neocon psychopaths and perpetrated by the Mossad with elements within the CIA, FBI, (others) with a craven and complicit media and congress and 'intelligence' agencies- for the purpose of making the 21 century just as murderous and bloody as the 20th, and for the exact same motivation; Zionism. (Roth$child, et al unilateral hegemony over the planet)

    Any attempts to flesh out these Satanic forces, that threaten the all life on this Earth with their psychotic imperative to rule absolutely, is a noble endeavor as far as I can see.

    If it could be proven that Betty Ong's narrative (like Osama's, or Kuwait baby incubators and so many others) was a farce and a fraud, and that by demonstrating this, it might animate a more widespread demand for more investigative efforts, until we finally create a tsunami of outrage and righteous anger that will come crushing down upon the heads of those fiends and criminals who're responsible, then to this end, more power to you.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @redmudhooch
    Watch the videos, use your brain. It doesn't take a real genius to see.

    Does that look like an explosion or a collapse?

    Its really not that hard.

    Why is it hard to believe that not a lot of people would jump at the chance to put their career/life on the line? To speak out against the people that did this, to challenge the narrative, just look what the media can do to people who do.

    It takes a very brave person to do what those 3000 A&E have done, I get the sense you probably wouldn't.

    And again, if they would do evil on the level of USS Liberty and Lavon Affair, why wouldn't they do this?

    If Liberty would have been sunk, the sailors killed, anyone who questioned that would be labeled a conspiracy theorist too.

    It looks like the result of a very heavy weight – many storeys of the buildings – falling on to a temporarily resisting structure which includes a modest but substantial amount of concrete. Not surprising because that’s whst happened.

    As to the LIberty isn’t it one of the strongest arguments against the extreme conspiracy version that having to kill everyone made it too risky?

    Read More
    • Replies: @redmudhooch
    Really? Grab some cinder blocks stack them up, take a few more cinder blocks and drop them on the stacked cinder blocks and report back what happens. Do all the stacked cinder blocks below explode outwards, all the way down to the bottom block? Or do the cinder blocks you drop just fracture and fall to the side of the stacked ones? Come on bud, you can't be that ignorant. I suspect you are a paid puppet. This doesn't take a physicist to figure out...
    Watch this video go to 4:20, 5:40, 6:40, how does the top "falling" cause floors below the top to explode outwards before the falling top even gets to that point?
    The news reporters watching it happen live seem to think it is exploding as well.

    The USS Liberty and Lavon affair part of my comment is just to prove that they have done exactly the same kind of things before to sell wars to the American public, and how similar the events are for justifying war based on lies.

    Do better this time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anonymous
    Ah, another one of the intellectually shortwinded brigade blusters away. Thanks for reminding me of that Lee Hamilton quote and causing me to find and read the whole interview. You should do it if you are honest. And do it again if you have a memory lapse.

    He actually confirms the validity of the comment you purport to reply to.

    He complains about the time pressure and the limitation on their resources ($3 million compared with $40 million for investigating Clinton's sexual peccadiloes). He points out how many people and organisations had reason to fear the Commission's work BUT he says he thinks they got it mostly right.

    You've shot yourself in your own foot.

    Indeed, it is worth reading, for Hamilton’s statements make clear he is nothing but a shill. Perhaps you are right that he cannot be portrayed as a 9-11 skeptic, but he is surely no asset for believers in the official storyline. At any rate, there is little doubt that the resources allocated to his investigation were meager in light of the event they were intended to cover.

    BTW, which of the anonymous assholes are you? I’ve lost track.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Losing track of you would be like losing track of an elderly rhinoceros stumbling blindly through the swamp.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Steve Gittelson

    Another very bitter failed writer of the Great American Novel?
     
    Novel? Perish the thought. BS Philosophy, MS Computer Science. No interest in novels at all -- haven't read fiction since a rather dreadful trip to St. Croix in 2007.

    However, in support of, and response to your gratuitous personal attack, based in conspiracy theory hurt feewings ... bite me, loser.

    Paging Parsons…

    One physiologically bound to the official narrative irrespective of its validity. Parson will enthusiastically regurgitate the ON as gospel and ignore anything that contradics it.

    As far as a Parsons is concerned the official narrative is reality. Anyone not in line with the ON is on the outside of reality, those outside this reality are often derided as conspiracy theorist.

    To a Parsons, the only reason why one would disagree with the ON is stupidity, ignorance, gullibility or dishonesty.

    Parsons who put time into debunking alternatives to the ON call themselves skeptics or debunkers. Instead of simply dismissing those who counter the ON claims as conspiracy theorist, crackpots and loons skeptics/debukers will research counter ON claims and give reasons why such claims are wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @AriusArmenian
    Many Christians are not Christians.
    Turn the other cheek? Forgive, even the 'enemy'? Seek truth?
    They are too busy demonizing and wanting to throw bombs.

    Turn the other cheek or not, “Christians” are still pagan polytheist human worshippers.

    Christ(pbuh) and his virgin mother(pbuh) had nothing to do with such deceitful delusions. They were among the most blessed of True Monotheists.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Steve Gittelson

    Else work harder on the mute and, gasp on dude.
     
    Let's put it this way: 17 years of conspiracy theory, and what have you -- pardon the expression -- loons got left?

    Nothing.

    Divorce sucks doesn’t it?

    Tell us how the twin towers exploded.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • {I don’t follow domestic Armenian politics, }

    It is obvious you don’t, that’s why you don’t know.

    {but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan – who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs –}

    Former President, and now PM Serzh Sargsyan _is_ unpopular, but it has nothing to do with utilities tariff: the tariffs issue was long time ago, it was resolved, and not a current issue. He is unpopular for other reasons.

    { This was accompanied by a bill making Armenia a parliamentary republic, in effect extending his rule.}

    Nope, it was not a bill
    You can’t do that by a bill.
    There was a constitutional referendum in 2015, passed by 66% with ~51% turnout that changed the form of government so that instead of the President being directly elected by the people, the majority party in the Parliament would select both the President and the Prime Minister. There were some other changes, but that was the main reason for the referendum.

    The title of ‘Prime Minister’ is a little misleading in this context, because generally in a Parliamentary form of government the PM is real head of state, the Commander in Chief, etc and a President is just a ceremonial post, if one exists. In Armenia the President is the Commander in Chief, responsible for foreign affairs, etc and the PM is for internal: economy and such.

    The constitutional change was championed by Serzh Sargsyan. Understanding by the people for approving the change was that he would not seek to become the PM, and thus extend his rule indefinitely on the sly. He kinda/sorta promised as much when selling the change.

    The current protests are because the people feel as if Serzh Sargsyan is just spitting on their face by becoming PM.

    He made a BIG mistake.
    He should have been happy with his accomplishments, and retired from public life honorably.
    Now he is despised and ridiculed.
    And the word from Yerevan is that the source of much discontent in Armenia – the group of oligarchs and big thieves who rob the country and the economy (…one of whom is his own brother), and who were protected by Serzh’s administration – pretty much forced him to take the PM position, because they are afraid to lose their privileged positions if new blood comes in.

    {There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days.}

    One can never say “never”, but highly unlikely.
    Too many reasons why something like that is a near impossibility in Armenia.
    Maybe another post.

    Read More
    • Agree: Anatoly Karlin
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    Thanks for this comment.

    Invaluable to have the input of an Armenian on this issue.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Twodees Partain
    "The all-wise Buddha of, I don’t know, Seattle, Brooklyn, Philadelphia?"

    More likely Lebanon, KS or Fargo, ND. He has to have this outlet since he has probably gotten his ass whipped from trying his snark out in public on people who could reach him.

    More likely Lebanon, KS or Fargo, ND. He has to have this outlet since he has probably gotten his ass whipped from trying his snark out in public on people who could reach him.

    ROFLMAO. I love you guys — you conspiracy whack-jobs. Fucking nuts from the git-go. Seventeen years go by, the world has moved on long, long ago, yet you focused, dedicated, self-sacrificing seekers after Truth exchange crib notes about phone calls (for the luv of god, tabulating phone calls from 17 years ago, jeezuss!!).

    It is interesting that conspiracy theory loonies each have their own selected homefield — your preferred conspiracy that consumes your, um, “hobby” time. Some of you fruitcakes are probably still hard at work on theories of who really killed Lizzie Borden’s Ma and Pa.

    Go back to your playground. I will leave you all alone now. But, gracious me! what frenetic stupidity! Obsession knows no limits — long proven, and proven again every day.

    Read More
    • Replies: @redmudhooch

    you conspiracy whack-jobs. Fucking nuts from the git-go. conspiracy theory loonies frenetic stupidity
     
    Once again, when you cannot win the debate with facts resort to name calling. Weak!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Another asshole who has never been to NYC in his life claiming expertise about the views of Manhattan from Brooklyn

    Who cares what you assholes think

    So, basically you have nothing?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I have more than you have, a man who lived in NYC and saw it happen.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @Seamus Day
    Agree. Gardner looks like a televangelist creep.

    I’ve given up on politicians and government. While I’m still a registered as a Republican I am now convinced best thing for this country is to throw sand in the gears wherever possible. Slow this dangerous runaway train down to a coast. Increase social welfare, immigration, diversity. Increase regulation and “earth-friendly” policies. Increase pensions and benefits for the military and federal workers. Double the size of the Army and Navy in terms of personnel. Promote more to officer ranks. Increase government subsidy of higher education. Etc.

    All that might not even be necessary to bring on a crash. It looks as though it could come on its own at any time. Maybe the current bloat will be enough.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @tanabear
    EliteComminc: "But neither one of these conclusions is born out by the evidence."

    NIST admitted in their study and analysis of WTC7 that it fell at free-fall for 2.25 seconds or roughly 8 stories. Yet Shyam Sunder, the lead NIST investigator, said that there was resistance provided during the collapse. However, you cannot have free-fall and resistance being provided at the same time. Whether to believe or disbelieve the official is story is very simple.

    Is momentum transfer at free-fall acceleration possible?

    Yes or No.

    I am going to think about this “free fall” issue you have introduced. It is entirely out of context with the discussion at hand.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Jonathan Revusky

    is there any way to compel consistent use of monikers?
     
    LOL. I also find the whole thing absolutely exasperating! Before, there was the ability just to be "Anonymous" or "Anon" and then Ron figured that was a disaster and a cock-up, which it obviously is, but now you've got Anon #234 and Anon # 432 and the implication is that you're supposed to keep track of these people in your head... Well,... maybe Ron Unz has a privileged kind of mind that can do that, but...

    But the whole thing is just such a total disaster! Even if people use their nicks consistently, it can be bad enough but this is just....

    Indeed. This thread has attracted an astonishing number of Anonymises(sp?), and an astonishing number of Anonymous posts. A quick assessment says almost half the posts originate from an “Anonymous” poster. The vast majority spout views contra your thesis. Hmmm…

    I can’t remember that happening on any other thread. Judging by most of the quality (not all), the Claxon call for “All hands on deck! Stations!” went all the way down to the 3rd & 4th-tiers on this topic.

    In the original discussion, I suggested that Ron’s stand on the truths of 9/11 could be distilled down to the presence of a plausible Betty Ong in the yearbook. He basically Frankly, it would have surprised me if a vaguely plausible Betty Ong wasn’t there, given that fake identities are normally built on genuine originals whose current history and whereabouts are unknown (died, disappeared, emigrated, etc).

    That no plausible Betty Ong appears indicates somebody screwed up, badly. In the original creation of the identity, and more recently in its coverup (?) in the on-line yearbook. It looks for all the world like an tsunami of Anonymises has been tasked to mask that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ximenes

    The general view in the 9/11 Truth community is that all the phone calls allegedly made from hijacked airplanes on that day, including Betty’s, are plainly fake.
     
    There is no 'Truth community,' or more likely most of that community is led by disinformation agents like David Ray Griffin of "Loose Change" producer Dylan Avery.

    Betty Ong is real, and the phone call she made was real. It was made on a seatback airphone, which did exist and were used by many of the 9/11 callers, such as Tom Burnett, who reported hijackers carrying guns to his wife in California from UAL93.

    Ong also reported a shooting on AAL11. That's why her call to her co-worker is so shrouded in mystery. Her call, like most of the others, only validates the official story in that it portrays hijackings being carried out by "Middle Eastern looking" men. Who those men were is still up for grabs. What made Ong's call unique is that she also reported the seat number of one of the hijackers carrying guns and shooting people, and it happened to belong, not to one of the well-known Arabs we were told about, but to an Israeli gentleman named Daniel Lewin, who had once been a member of the elite commando unit Seyeret Metkal.

    Now do you see why so many want us to believe the calls are fake, and that Betty Ong didn't even exist?

    So Betty Ong was the only person who identified an Israeli commando as one of the hijackers who shot people.

    No wonder the Israelis planted stories all over the internet that she didn’t exist.

    And most of the naive credulous internet “ researchers” on this site read those Israeli stories and believe she didn’t exist.

    That’s why I usually comment only about things I have personally done or seen or spoken with a person, such as my friend’s nephew who saw the planes crash into the towers from his Bay Ridge Brooklyn school.

    Betty Ong didn’t ever exist story was obviously planted all over the internet by the Israelis and the internet researcher fools fools believed it because they read it on the internet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Meimou
    Bingo. Expect the MSM to put a spotlight on this, or at least snopes or trash sites like The Daily Beast.

    I wonder if the Ong family will sue Alex Jones too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Have you thought through the problems of
    1. Having the thermite installed at just the right very different levels for where the planes would later strike the twin towers?
    2. The evidence/prima facie inference that the very different weight above the fire weakened steel in the two towers was the reason one collapsed in a much shorter time than the other? [I trust you are not going to pose as an expert on how heat can weaken steel or other technical matters on which you have no basis for personal belief]?
    3. Why any conspirators would want to add to the risks by having WTC7 deliberately demolished at the time of the major event?
    4. Why Occam's Razor doesn't push the motive of ObL (to have America bogged down in war in Afghanistan) way ahead of any speculative motives involving a chain of events leading to war in Iraq which is far chancier and more complicated?

    Have you thought through the problems of
    1. Having the thermite installed at just the right very different levels for where the planes would later strike the twin towers?

    Why would the thermite need to be installed at just the right levels? explosives were all over the towers.

    2. The evidence/prima facie inference that the very different weight above the fire weakened steel in the two towers was the reason one collapsed in a much shorter time than the other?

    1. Did any of you Parsons ever provide evidence that the fire was hot enough to weaken steel?

    2. Even if it was hot enough to weaken steel why would the tower collapse globally and simultaneously?

    3.The twin towers did not simply collapse, the top of the towers exploded, debris clearly was ejected from the towers. The fact that theses ejections were accompanied by sounds that resemble explosions don’t help your case

    3. Why any conspirators would want to add to the risks by having WTC7 deliberately demolished at the time of the major event?

    Why would OBL think he could pull off 911? How did he know one would call the FBI when a bunch of Arabs wanted to learn how to fly a plane but not take off.?

    How did he know NORAAD wouldn’t shoot down the plane?

    [I trust you are not going to pose as an expert on how heat can weaken steel or other technical matters on which you have no basis for personal belief]

    It doesn’t take specialized knowledge to know the official story is nonsense, not that you care about the opinion of experts that contradict the official narrative.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    Original source, someone who stood in that school yard and saw the first plane crash into the tower and saw the second plane from his classroom windows.

    It’s a high school in the Bay ridge neighborhood

    Brooklyn is right across the river from manhattan and the towers could be seen from most of Brooklyn. So can much of manhattans skyline be seen from Brooklyn

    Sooo If something is not on the internet it never happened, never existed?

    Have none of you people ever heard of original sources?

    At least ten or fifteen people saw airplanes hit the buildings. There are even videos of planes hitting the buildings. And it was on live TV. Why do you make a big deal of some one in Brooklyn in a schoolyard see a plane hit the building? Yes you can see Manhattan from Brooklyn. So What? What does that prove? It was on television. Is that not enough for you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Because Sparkon denies the towers fell despite various people present in Manhattan or across the river in Brooklyn seeing the planes crash into the buildings.

    It’s not just this thread. Many times over the years someone posts that he or she was in Manhattan that day and saw the planes and the towers fall.

    Sparkon always jumps in and claims the poster didn’t see anything and nothing happened in Manhattan that day.

    He or she only believes what he or she reads in the internet. That’s why I mentioned the man who saw the event happening across the river from his Brooklyn school.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Anon
    I'm afraid even some of the dimmer bulbs on UR threads might groan like a Trump staffer at POTUS's latest egregious tweet when they see how pathetic and feeble you are willing to prove yourself.

    You need your old Grade 1 teacher to stop you saying you won't try answering my observation about the lack of numbers added to the original architects & engineers signatories because I would (you suppose) manipulate the criterion of "credibility". Oh don't make your even half sharp allies cringe. Whatever inference can be drawn from the facts I asserted could only be countered by showing that my premise was wrong. By omission indeed you can be taken to have admitted that the a&e worthies have failed to get any more eager beavers to sign up after the initial rush of blood to the head. To be perfectly clear for the simpleminded, you could have answered me with the actual figures of signatories.

    Watch the videos, use your brain. It doesn’t take a real genius to see.

    Does that look like an explosion or a collapse?

    Its really not that hard.

    Why is it hard to believe that not a lot of people would jump at the chance to put their career/life on the line? To speak out against the people that did this, to challenge the narrative, just look what the media can do to people who do.

    It takes a very brave person to do what those 3000 A&E have done, I get the sense you probably wouldn’t.

    And again, if they would do evil on the level of USS Liberty and Lavon Affair, why wouldn’t they do this?

    If Liberty would have been sunk, the sailors killed, anyone who questioned that would be labeled a conspiracy theorist too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    It looks like the result of a very heavy weight - many storeys of the buildings - falling on to a temporarily resisting structure which includes a modest but substantial amount of concrete. Not surprising because that's whst happened.

    As to the LIberty isn't it one of the strongest arguments against the extreme conspiracy version that having to kill everyone made it too risky?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[249] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ximenes

    The general view in the 9/11 Truth community is that all the phone calls allegedly made from hijacked airplanes on that day, including Betty’s, are plainly fake.
     
    There is no 'Truth community,' or more likely most of that community is led by disinformation agents like David Ray Griffin of "Loose Change" producer Dylan Avery.

    Betty Ong is real, and the phone call she made was real. It was made on a seatback airphone, which did exist and were used by many of the 9/11 callers, such as Tom Burnett, who reported hijackers carrying guns to his wife in California from UAL93.

    Ong also reported a shooting on AAL11. That's why her call to her co-worker is so shrouded in mystery. Her call, like most of the others, only validates the official story in that it portrays hijackings being carried out by "Middle Eastern looking" men. Who those men were is still up for grabs. What made Ong's call unique is that she also reported the seat number of one of the hijackers carrying guns and shooting people, and it happened to belong, not to one of the well-known Arabs we were told about, but to an Israeli gentleman named Daniel Lewin, who had once been a member of the elite commando unit Seyeret Metkal.

    Now do you see why so many want us to believe the calls are fake, and that Betty Ong didn't even exist?

    Betty Ong is real, and the phone call she made was real. It was made on a seatback airphone,

    Cabin staff (of course) have their own radio communications facilities separate from the optional “airphone” system to talk to ground crew. Equally, and of course, they have well-rehearsed emergency procedures that are presumably not reliant on airphones that may not be available at all.

    It is at least puzzling that established communications procedures for emergencies were not followed.

    Similarly, the third-hand way in which the Betty Ong call was supposedly reduced to writing does not pass the smell test. Why was the call not transferred directly to a senior airline official in charge of security/hijacking issues?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Maybe there was not a senior official in charge of hijackings

    I wouldn’t be surprised.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • anonymous[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @Greasy William
    It isn't over and it is.

    The missile attacks were pointless and mainly had to do with Trump needing to demonstrate a credible ability and willingness to use force in the interests of furthering his foreign policy goals re North Korea and Iran.

    The US strategy is publicly available: stay in Syrian Kurdistan forever to deny Assad the oil wealth. Keep Syria regionally and internationally isolated. Keep the fronts within Syria active so Syria/Iran/Russia keep getting drained. This was the strategy before last week's missile attacks and it remains the strategy today.

    The idea is not to remove Assad, per se, but rather to force Russia and Iran to spend unsustainable amounts of money propping Assad up. So far the strategy has been a huge success and we are yet to hear The Saker/Southfront/Magnier offer a realistic plan of how the US will be dislodged. So far all we have are fantasies from Magnier about how Hezbollah is going to infiltrate hostile Kurdish territory and inflict extensive casualties on the US troops. Back in the real world, however, we know that that isn't going to happen and might not even be attempted.

    So all in all, things are looking great for the Jewish people. Then again, it isn't a fair fight: we have G-d on our side.

    Then again, it isn’t a fair fight: we have G-d on our side.

    What you have is Satan on your side. Your minds and souls are too rotten to recognise the difference.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • @Erebus

    I find it almost hard to believe that Ron Unz is so unopen to this idea being true. He seems to be totally on board with 911–why can’t he leap any further?
     
    I don't find it odd at all.

    In a nutshell, humans live, not in the Newtonian world, but in a narrative. They need the meaning(s) that only a narrative can lend to the cold interactions of forces and masses. The narratives get more and more complex as one goes up the food chain. At the socio-political level they can get complex indeed, and the people who have seen success within the prevailing socio-political narrative have the most invested in it. Typically, they're are also the ones best equipped to defend it.

    What plebes like us believe doesn't matter. "The Ruling classes" have ever depended on the total capitulation of the intelligentsia, political, and upper economic classes to the narrative for their power. That is the great insight of Orwell's 2+2=5. Belief in an absurdity signifies total capitulation, even when it's feigned.

    I've (literally) watched competent, successful engineers do the maths on the collapse of the towers, stare at the results, and reject them. Some broke contact with me.

    In this Betty Ong yearbook case, we see the process in action. Presented with increasingly persuasive evidence, Ron's went from "85-90%" certainty of her existence to "90-95%". If a real original copy equally or more compelling were to be put in front of him, it wouldn't surprise me much if he simply walked away from the wager. The narrative will defend itself any way it can.

    What plebes like us believe doesn’t matter. “The Ruling classes” have ever depended on the total capitulation of the intelligentsia, political, and upper economic classes to the narrative for their power.

    It must matter or they wouldn’t go through all of this nonsense. They would just do it.
    The amount of sock puppets/bots/trolls sent to articles like this tell me that it does matter. I get the feeling they’re pretty worried lately.
    They wouldn’t be silencing fre speech, alternative views if it didn’t matter either. The level of censorship lately also tells me that they are concerned.
    I think they may be a day late and a shekel short though, even my 80 something year old neighbor is asking me where on the web to go for real news, he’s a real Fox News kind of guy too, would’ve never expected him to ask me the kind of questions he was asking recently… uhh ohhh!

    Read More
    • Agree: Meimou
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    Your word is not good enough.

    Another asshole who has never been to NYC in his life claiming expertise about the views of Manhattan from Brooklyn

    Who cares what you assholes think

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    So, basically you have nothing?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anonymous[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miro23

    I would only trust Congressmen to stay bought but no one is going to have told them that 9/11 was a put up job or that they had to cover for Israel or the CIA so they probably did their best with expert witnesses and the evidence they heard about what, physically, happened. A bit like a rather superior quality jury.
     
    In any political environment (and most organizations are political to some extent) there's an awareness of OK subjects and Not-OK subjects of conversation - often related to the organizational power structure. Go around badmouthing the managing director and you might get fired.

    Congress is a hyper-political environment, and Congressmen understand perfectly the Congressional power structure - and they know better than to question the official account of 9/11. They probably even try to cleanse it from their thoughts.

    That’s all very general. Try reading the interview with Lee Hamilton who made the misrepresented statement about being set up to fail.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Trump pulled the trigger, but instead of a “bang!” what the world heard was a demure “click”. Considering that we are talking about playing a most dangerous game of potentially nuclear Russian AngloZionist roulette, the “click” is very good news indeed. But, to use the words of Nikki Haley, the US “gun” is still “locked...
  • @James Brown
    "And that suggests to me that the only real solution to this extremely dangerous situation is to find a way to remove the regime in Kremlin and replace it with something else."

    Very good idea indeed!

    I would also suggest that "the only real solution to this extremely dangerous situation" is to find a way to remove the regime in the White House.

    In fact, according to one of his "brilliant" former servant it is not a regime anymore but a mafia.

    Which of course is true. But it has always been a mafia. From the beginning. From George Washington to Obama. Unless you're a liar and a criminal, as the former head of FBI is, everyone knows that the mafia state didn't start with Trump.

    If we manage to "remove" this mafia state, I would suggest that the mafia and apartheid state in the ME will crumble within days and all the colonized European states will become independent.

    If only the people living under “regimes” in all countries, big or small, powerful or weak, could put in place laws to screen all politicians for (a) basic sanity (mandatory sanity testing); (b) basic honesty (mandatory anti-crookedness testing); and (c) basic truthfulness (mandatory truth-serum testing) all problems of war and peace will be solved.

    Now why does my mind keep wandering off into utopian territories knowing fully well that no politician anywhere will pass all the three tests? So let us sit back and enjoy the games of Russian Roulette. Hell, if we bet and get the bet right we may even make a lot of money!

    Read More
    • Replies: @James Brown
    I don't believe the solution for a better world is more laws, better laws.
    We will never have a better world until people understand that the only thing one can change is oneself. The only revolution worth talking about and doing is the one one does with oneself.
    The only growth which has any meaning is "spiritual growth". - Soljenitsyne.
    With laws you can get everything. Even the hell: Communism, Nazism, Capitalism, were and are legal.
    All Americans wars (mass murder) were and are legal.

    "Now why does my mind keep wandering off into utopian territories ?"

    Our thoughts are important.

    I would suggest you to read a masterpiece - ISLAND ( Aldous Huxley). It's about "utopian territories".
    "Island" should be mandatory reading in all countries. That of course won't happen.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • "As one of the conditions of considering publication of this article, Ron Unz has required me to personally apologize to commenter Rurik for having previously threatened to "dox" him based on our private correspondence. I am therefore providing that apology, and also sincerely promising to make no such threats nor take such actions against him...
  • Anonymous[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mike P
    Lee Hamilton, the co-chair of the commission, said that it was set up to fail.

    "Superior quality jury" my foot. You are nothing but a hired shill. What is the weather like in Tel Aviv?

    Ah, another one of the intellectually shortwinded brigade blusters away. Thanks for reminding me of that Lee Hamilton quote and causing me to find and read the whole interview. You should do it if you are honest. And do it again if you have a memory lapse.

    He actually confirms the validity of the comment you purport to reply to.

    He complains about the time pressure and the limitation on their resources ($3 million compared with $40 million for investigating Clinton’s sexual peccadiloes). He points out how many people and organisations had reason to fear the Commission’s work BUT he says he thinks they got it mostly right.

    You’ve shot yourself in your own foot.

    Read More
    • Troll: Mike P
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Indeed, it is worth reading, for Hamilton’s statements make clear he is nothing but a shill. Perhaps you are right that he cannot be portrayed as a 9-11 skeptic, but he is surely no asset for believers in the official storyline. At any rate, there is little doubt that the resources allocated to his investigation were meager in light of the event they were intended to cover.

    BTW, which of the anonymous assholes are you? I’ve lost track.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ximenes

    The general view in the 9/11 Truth community is that all the phone calls allegedly made from hijacked airplanes on that day, including Betty’s, are plainly fake.
     
    There is no 'Truth community,' or more likely most of that community is led by disinformation agents like David Ray Griffin of "Loose Change" producer Dylan Avery.

    Betty Ong is real, and the phone call she made was real. It was made on a seatback airphone, which did exist and were used by many of the 9/11 callers, such as Tom Burnett, who reported hijackers carrying guns to his wife in California from UAL93.

    Ong also reported a shooting on AAL11. That's why her call to her co-worker is so shrouded in mystery. Her call, like most of the others, only validates the official story in that it portrays hijackings being carried out by "Middle Eastern looking" men. Who those men were is still up for grabs. What made Ong's call unique is that she also reported the seat number of one of the hijackers carrying guns and shooting people, and it happened to belong, not to one of the well-known Arabs we were told about, but to an Israeli gentleman named Daniel Lewin, who had once been a member of the elite commando unit Seyeret Metkal.

    Now do you see why so many want us to believe the calls are fake, and that Betty Ong didn't even exist?

    OMG. Thank you so much for the information. That’s the first real proof that Israel was involved I’ve heard.

    I always wondered why, of all the people who died that day the only person claimed not to exist is Betty Ong

    I’m going to add it my list a paper and print list so it doesn’t disappear.

    Thank you so much.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
  • There is a non-trivial chance of a color revolution in Armenia in the next few days. I don't follow domestic Armenian politics, but the basic gist of it is that the two-term President Serzh Sargsyan - who is highly unpopular due to increases in utilities tariffs - has recently transitioned from the Presidency to the...
  • @Dmitry
    I was tempted to say that EU has some structural similarity to the Ponzi scheme, with its constant need to expand the member base.

    But of course, this would be wrong to say, as in the Ponzi scheme, it is the new members who bring in the money, whereas in the EU it is the opposite - it is the new members which drain the money, and the old members who provide it.

    Hence, it is a quite paradox, as there is plenty of incentive for new members to join the EU, but the incentive for existing members to accede the new members, is not. And yet the existing EU members nonetheless continue to looks for expansion, even to the edge of suicide (acceding Turkey would be such a suicide). It is here - in this irrationality - that the religious and millenarian aspects of the EU project become more clear.

    I also add that the two dimensions of EU - width and depth of integration - are generally incompatible with eachother and should be trading-off, while the EU nonetheless attempts to raise the value of both variables.

    If the EU would become more shallowly integrated, there would be far better benefit to cost ratio, when expanding its width. In its original form as just a free-trade area, actually even Russia would have been easily acceded.

    I was tempted to say that EU has some structural similarity to the Ponzi scheme, with its constant need to expand the member base.

    Don’t know why you’re tempted to say that. It’s a nonsense statement.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.