Fighting Mad Cow Disease: Prion Remediation via Composting

With current methods, prions keep getting back into the food chain. That means more deaths due to mad cow disease. Is composting the answer? Image by Decoded Science, all rights reserved

With current methods, prions keep getting back into the food chain. That means more deaths due to mad cow disease. Is composting the answer? Image by Decoded Science, all rights reserved

Mad-Cow Disease comes as the result of ingesting prions. The current methods of disposal are not 100 percent fool-proof, which means that the prions go right back into the food chain, spreading infection. Now, however, we have word from Canadian researchers in the journal Environmental Science & Technology that the means to readily bio-degrade the Mad Cow agent on a large scale is close at hand.

These researchers report 90 percent ‘kill-off’ for tissue infected with the Mad Cow agent and a 99 percent ‘kill-off’ for tissue infected with a similar agent that is responsible for Creutzfeldt-Jacob syndrome.

What Is Mad Cow Disease?

Mad Cow syndrome became an issue in the 1990s when individuals in Europe and in the US became ill with a brain wasting disease; the illness was contracted after eating beef infected with the agent—a protein. The affected tissue is contagious; the disease spread from animal to human when cows were fed tissue of previously infected animal protein.

Presently, there have been 23 confirmed deaths due to Mad Cow syndrome in North America and outbreak has resulted in $ 11 billion dollars in cattle loss, as well.

Prions and Mad Cow Disease

The term prion came to the forefront of public perception in the early 1990s. What many in the mainstream media and science found it hard to believe, at the time, was how a prion could alter human and animal behavior. Prions accomplish this by irreversibly changing brain tissue. Prions act like viruses, co-opting brain tissue and in effect turning healthy individuals and animals into weak shells of their former selves. However, the pathogen did not possess a discernible ‘cell structure.’ It seemed as if it were acting like alone.


________________
Would you like to see more articles like this?
Support This Expert's Articles, This Category of Articles, or the Site in General Here.
Just put your preference in the "I Would Like to Support" Box after you Click to Donate Below:


________________

The best thinking presently seems to indicate that prions tend to behave like dominoes; once set in motion, there is very little one can do to stop the process. The affected protein adopts a configuration, or chemical structure, that differs from normal physiological functioning. Adding to the mystery is evidence that indicates that there may be more than one agent (or chemical structure) that infects the body at these times.

A representative structure of a partial protein resembles the following structure:

Partial skeletal structure of a Prion.

Partial skeletal structure of a Prion. Courtesy of National Institutes of Health

Getting Rid of Prions

When animals have prions, it’s critical to properly dispose of the corpses in order to avoid spreading the outbreak. Researchers discovered a method to bio-degrade the agent in the early 2000s.

The researchers successfully subjected infected tissue to enzymes that ‘digested’ the prions – but this method had not been tested on a large scale. At the time, three separate research groups found that various bacteria and fungi could digest the infected tissue under highly alkaline conditions.

The Canadian workers utilized a composting methodology to destroy the affected protein material, subjecting the prion material to an aerobic cattle manure compost that contained the following Streptomyces, Thermus, Bacillus, and Tritirachium genera of bacteria for up to 3 months. The results were good enough to warrant further investigation.

Previous methods involved incineration or rendering followed by burial. The methodologies have proved to be economically hard and not fool-proof.

While the incineration method may seem like a good idea, it is not completely effective nor is it economically sound. Burning the tainted meat involves a two-stage incineration that is followed by an alkaline disinfectant and autoclave. This methodology is effective only in high volume. It has proved to be non-feasible to accomplish it on a daily basis.

Rendering and burial does not always work either, due to the hardiness of the prion particle – we find ‘non-rendered’ prion material in the soil following the burial; prions have entered the food chain through the process of rendering and burial.

Fighting Mad Cow Disease

Since the discovery of prions three decades ago, we have not found a method of removing the tainted meat from the food chain that works effectively. Our successes have come at a cost–a cost too  hard to bear for those unlucky enough to have ingested the protein. A cost that some have deemed too high because they found it too hard to accept the notion that agricultural standards need to evolve with the needs of society. However, new research into composting may hold the key to solving this years-old puzzle.

© Copyright 2014 John A. Jaksich, All rights Reserved. Written For: Decoded Science
Decoded Everything is a non-profit corporation, dependent on donations from readers like you. Donate now! Your support keeps the great information coming!

Comments

  1. says

    re-composting TSE Prions
    re-those 23 _documented_ mad cows (documented and actual cases, a big difference)
    they have learned nothing from the mad cow follies.
    stupid is, as stupid does, and some times, you just can’t fix stupid $$$

    it’s all about money, _TRADE_, nothing else matters.

    > After 230 days of composting, only one in five hamsters succumbed to TSE disease… composting TSE prions is an accident waiting to happening, absolutely foolish in my opinion…tss

    SRM are certain cattle tissues capable of transmitting BSE. There is no human health risk assessment to indicate the absence of human health concerns associated with use of composted SRM domestically. To date, scientific evidence has not been able to demonstrate that composting destroys prions. Although domestic use would pose a negligible risk to livestock, there is a potential risk to humans via direct ingestion of the compost or of compost particles adhered to skin or plant material (e.g. carrots). Another potential route of exposure is by ingestion of prions that have been taken up by plants. It has been proven that bacteria are readily taken up by some plants (e.g. E. coli in lettuce) thus the uptake of prions by plants cannot be precluded or dismissed at this time. As a science-based regulator, the CFIA cannot change the policy on this issue without a risk assessment demonstrating that the use of composted SRM poses an acceptable risk to humans.

    http://www.inspection.gc.ca/plants/fertilizers/registration-requirements/srm/domestic-use/eng/1320626671141/1320626734953

    Friday, September 27, 2013

    Uptake of Prions into Plants

    Presentation Abstract

    http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2013/09/uptake-of-prions-into-plants.html

    New studies on the heat resistance of hamster-adapted scrapie agent: Threshold survival after ashing at 600°C suggests an inorganic template of replication

    http://www.pnas.org/content/97/7/3418.full

    Prion Infected Meat-and-Bone Meal Is Still Infectious after Biodiesel Production

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493038/

    Detection of protease-resistant cervid prion protein in water from a CWD-endemic area

    http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/prion/NicholsPRION3-3.pdf

    A Quantitative Assessment of the Amount of Prion Diverted to Category 1 Materials and Wastewater During Processing

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01922.x/abstract

    Rapid assessment of bovine spongiform encephalopathy prion inactivation by heat treatment in yellow grease produced in the industrial manufacturing process of meat and bone meals

    http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/2013/07/rapid-assessment-of-bovine-spongiform.html

    PPo4-4:

    Survival and Limited Spread of TSE Infectivity after Burial

    http://www.prion2010.org/bilder/prion_2010_program_latest_w_posters_4_.pdf?139&PHPSESSID=a30a38202cfec579000b77af81be3099

    In the USA, under the Food and Drug Administration’s BSE Feed Regulation (21 CFR 589.2000) most material (exceptions include milk, tallow, and gelatin) from deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. With regards to feed for non-ruminant animals, under FDA law, CWD positive deer may not be used for any animal feed or feed ingredients. For elk and deer considered at high risk for CWD, the FDA recommends that these animals do not enter the animal feed system. However, this recommendation is guidance and not a requirement by law.

    Animals considered at high risk for CWD include:

    1) animals from areas declared to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD eradication zones and

    2) deer and elk that at some time during the 60-month period prior to slaughter were in a captive herd that contained a CWD-positive animal.

    Therefore, in the USA, materials from cervids other than CWD positive animals may be used in animal feed and feed ingredients for non-ruminants.

    snip…

    http://www.defra.gov.uk/animal-diseases/files/qra_chronic-wasting-disease-121029.pdf Sunday, December 15, 2013

    FDA PART 589 — SUBSTANCES PROHIBITED FROM USE IN ANIMAL FOOD OR FEED VIOLATIONS OFFICIAL ACTION INDICATED OIA UPDATE DECEMBER 2013 UPDATE

    http://madcowusda.blogspot.com/2013/12/fda-part-589-substances-prohibited-from.html

    Monday, May 05, 2014

    *** cwd tse prion testing PMCA , IHC, tonsil, rectal, biopsy ???

    http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2014/05/cwd-tse-prion-testing-pmca-ihc-tonsil.html

    Tuesday, May 20, 2014

    “Atypical” Chronic Wasting Disease in PRNP Genotype 225FF Mule Deer

    http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2014/05/atypical-chronic-wasting-disease-in.html

    Monday, May 05, 2014

    *** Member Country details for listing OIE CWD 2013 against the criteria of Article 1.2.2., the Code Commission recommends consideration for listing

    http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2014/05/member-country-details-for-listing-oie.html

    USA fda mad cow, deer, elk, dog, cat, cow, sheep, feed ban is still terribly flawed ;

    In the USA, under the Food and Drug Administration’s BSE Feed Regulation (21 CFR 589.2000) most material (exceptions include milk, tallow, and gelatin) from deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. With regards to feed for non-ruminant animals, under FDA law, CWD positive deer may not be used for any animal feed or feed ingredients. For elk and deer considered at high risk for CWD, the FDA recommends that these animals do not enter the animal feed system. However, this recommendation is guidance and not a requirement by law.

    Animals considered at high risk for CWD include:

    1) animals from areas declared to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD eradication zones and

    2) deer and elk that at some time during the 60-month period prior to slaughter were in a captive herd that contained a CWD-positive animal.

    Therefore, in the USA, materials from cervids other than CWD positive animals may be used in animal feed and feed ingredients for non-ruminants.

    snip…

    http://www.defra.gov.uk/animal-diseases/files/qra_chronic-wasting-disease-121029.pdf

    Sunday, December 15, 2013

    FDA PART 589 — SUBSTANCES PROHIBITED FROM USE IN ANIMAL FOOD OR FEED VIOLATIONS OFFICIAL ACTION INDICATED OIA UPDATE DECEMBER 2013 UPDATE

    http://madcowusda.blogspot.com/2013/12/fda-part-589-substances-prohibited-from.html

    Sunday, May 18, 2014

    *** Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE PRION DISEASE and the transmission to other species (see updated human risk factors)

    http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2014/05/chronic-wasting-disease-cwd-tse-prion.html

    Monday, May 19, 2014

    *** Variant CJD: 18 years of research and surveillance

    http://vcjd.blogspot.com/2014/05/variant-cjd-18-years-of-research-and.html

    Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
    Bacliff, Texas USA 77518

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *