The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Anatoly Karlin Andrei Martyanov Andrew Joyce Andrew Napolitano Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Egor Kholmogorov Eric Margolis Forum Fred Reed Agnostic P-ter Godfree Roberts Guillaume Durocher Gustavo Arellano Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Petras James Thompson JayMan John Derbyshire Jonathan Revusky Kevin Barrett Lance Welton Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Gottfried Paul Kersey Peter Frost Peter Lee Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tom Engelhardt A. Graham Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Ahmet Öncü Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alfred McCoy Alison Rose Levy Alison Weir Allegra Harpootlian Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Andre Damon Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Ann Jones Anonymous Anthony DiMaggio Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Austen Layard Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Carl Horowitz Catherine Crump Chalmers Johnson Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlotteville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel McAdams Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David Irving David Lorimer David Martin David North David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Ellen Cantarow Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Girin F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Franklin Lamb Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilad Atzmon Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Foster Gregory Hood Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Henry Cockburn Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Hunter DeRensis Ian Fantom Ira Chernus Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Fulford James J. O'Meara Jane Lazarre Jared S. Baumeister Jared Taylor Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Pilger John Reid John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John Taylor John Titus John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Cook Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Kees Van Der Pijl Kelley Vlahos Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin MacDonald Kevin Rothrock Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Laurent Guyénot Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Linda Preston Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marcus Alethia Marcus Cicero Margaret Flowers Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Perry Mark Weber Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Moon Landing Skeptic Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Nelson Rosit Nicholas Stix Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Paul Cochrane Paul Engler Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Pepe Escobar Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Van Buren Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Randy Shields Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Rémi Tremblay Richard Hugus Richard Krushnic Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Trivers Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Ryan Dawson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Spencer Davenport Spencer Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Steve Fraser Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Ted Rall Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Dalton Thomas Frank Thomas O. Meehan Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Tobias Langdon Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Virginia Dare Vladimir Brovkin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block Washington Watcher Wayne Allensworth William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2016 Election Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Blacks Censorship China Conspiracy Theories Crime Culture Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Education Foreign Policy Genetics History Human Biodiversity Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Miscellaneous Movies Neocons Obama Open Thread Political Correctness Politics Race Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Sports Syria Terrorism Ukraine United States World War II 100% Jussie Content 100% Jussie-free Content 100% Jussie-relevant Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2012 US Elections 2018 Election 2020 Election 23andMe 365 Black 365Black 9/11 A Farewell To Alms Aarab Barghouti Abc News Abigail Marsh Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academia Acheivement Gap Achievement Gap Acting White Adam Schiff Adaptation Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adoptees Adoption Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIDS Ainu AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Aldous Huxley Alexander Hamilton Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Kudrin Alexei Navalny Ali Dawabsheh Alt Left Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Dream American Empire American History American Indians American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Revolution Amerindians Amish Amish Quotient Amnesty Amnesty International Amoral Familialism Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anaconda Anatoly Karlin Ancestry Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Near East Anders Breivik Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Jackson Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Angela Stent Anglo-Saxons Anglosphere Animal IQ Animal Rights Ann Coulter Anne Frank Annual Country Reports On Terrorism Anthropology Anti-Gentilism Anti-Vaccination Antifa Antiquity Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Antiwar Movement Anwar Al-Awlaki Ap Apartheid Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Architecture Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Arkham's Razor Armenia Army Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians ASPM Assassinations Assimilation Assortative Mating Atheism Atlanta Attractiveness Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Autism Automation Avigdor Lieberman Ayodhhya Azerbaijan Babes And Hunks Babri Masjid Baby Gap Backlash Bacterial Vaginosis Balanced Polymorphism Balkans Baltics Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Barbarians Baseball Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables Basque BBC BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Economics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belts Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Benedict Arnold Benjamin Cardin Benjamin Netanyahu Benny Gantz Berezovsky Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Bernies Sanders #BernieSoWhite BICOM Big History BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill 59 Bill Browder Bill Clinton Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Bioethics Biological Imperative Biology Birmingham Bisexuality Bitcoin BJP Black Community Black Crime Black Friday Black History Black History Month Black Lives Matter Black Muslims Black People Black People Accreditation Black Run America Black Undertow #BlackJobsMatter #BlackLiesMurder Blade Runner Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Bmi Boasian Anthropology boats-in-the-water bodybuilding Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Border Security Border Wall Borderlanders Boris Johnson Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brahmans Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brexit Brezhnev BRICs Brighter Brains Britain Brittany Watts Build The Wall Burakumin Burma Bush Bush Administration Business Byu California Californication Cambodia Cameron Russell Camp Of The Saints Campus Rape Canada #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Candida Albicans Capitalism Cardiovascular Disease Carlos Slim Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carter Page Catalonia Catfight Catholic Church Catholicism Caucasus Cavaliers Cecil Rhodes Central Asia Chanda Chisala Charles Darwin Charles Krauthammer Charles Murray Charles Percy Charles Schumer Charleston Shooting Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Cherlie Hebdo Chess Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Children China/America China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Economy Chinese Evolution Chinese History Chinese IQ Chinese Language Chinese People Chris Gown Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Chuck Hagel Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Circumcision Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilization CJIA Clannishness Clans Clash Of Civilizations Class Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clinton Clintons Cliodynamics clusterfake Coal Coalition Coalition Of The Fringes Coast Guard Cochran And Harpending Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Empathy Cognitive Psychology Cognitive Science Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard Collapse Party College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columba Bush Comic Books Communism Community Reinvestment Act Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Consciousness Consequences Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corruption Corruption Perception Index Cory Booker Counterpunch Cousin Marriage Cover Story Creationism CRIF Crimea Crimean Tatars Crimethink Crisis Crispr Crops crops-rotting-in-the-fields Cruise Missiles Crying Among The Farmland Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuckoldry Cuckservatism Cuckservative Cultural Anthropology Cultural Marxism Culture War Curfew Cut The Sh*t Guys Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dana Milbank Daniel Tosh Daren Acemoglu Dark Ages Darwinism Data Data Analysis Data Posts David Friedman David Frum David Hackett Fischer David Ignatius David Irving David Kramer David Lane David Moser David Petraeus Davide Piffer De Ploribus Unum Death Of The West Death Penalty Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Debt Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire Deep South Deep State Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denisovans Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Justice Deprivation Derek Harvey Detroit Development Developmental Noise Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders Dick Cheney Dienekes Diet Dinesh D'Souza Diplomacy Discrimination Disease Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dodecad Dogs Dollar Donme Don't Get Detroit-ed Dopamine Dostoevsky Down Syndrome Dreams From My Father Dresden Dress Codes Drone War Drones Drug Use Drugs DSM Duke Duterte Dylan Roof Dynasty Dysgenic E-books E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians Eastern Europe Ebola Ecology Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economic Theory Economy Ecuador Ed Miller Edward Gibbon Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Diveroli Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Elections Electric Cars Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliot Rodger Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Empathy Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epistemology Erdogan Espionage Estonia Estrogen Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Genetic Interests Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity EU Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Genomics European History European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Genomics Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Eye Color Eyes Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Recognition Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News fallout False Flag Attack Family Family Matters Family Systems Fantasy Far Abroad FARA Farmers Farming Fascism FBI FDA FDD Fecundity Federal Reserve Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Feminists Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Fethullah Gulen Feuds Fields Medals FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Crisis Financial Debt Financial Times Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Policy Foreign Service Fracking France Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Frantz Fanon Franz Boas Freakonomics Fred Hiatt Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Canadians Friday Fluff Fried Chicken Friendly & Conventional Frivolty Frontlash Funny Future Futurism Game Game Of Nations Game Of Thrones Gandhi Gangs Gary Taubes Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gemayel Clan Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gender Relations Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Social Survey Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Of Height Genocide Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Clooney George H. W. Bush George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Gilad Atzmon Gina Haspel Gladwell Glenn Beck Global Terrorism Index Global Warming Globalism Globalization GMO God God Delusion Gold Golf Google Goths Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Graphs GRE Great Leap Forward Great Powers #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greg Clark Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran GRF Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guangzhou Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan Gypsies H-1B H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban hair Hair Color Hair Lengthening Haiti Hajnal Line Half Sigma Halloween Hamilton: An American Musical HammerHate Hanzi Happening Happiness Harriet Tubman Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hasbara hate Hate Crimes Hate Facts Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Hbd Fallout Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Disease Heart Health Hegira Height Height Privilege Helmuth Nyborg Help Henry Harpending Heredity Heritability Hexaco Hezbollah Hillary Clinton Himachal Pradesh Hindu Caste System Hispanic Crime Hispanics Hist kai Historical Genetics Historical Population Genetics History Of Science Hitler Hodgepodge Hollywood Holocaust Homicide Homicide Rate Homosexuality Houellebecq House Intelligence Committee Housing Howard Kohr Hox Hoxby HplusNRx Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Hug Thug Human Achievement human-capital Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genome Human Genomics Human Rights Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Katrina Hybridization Hypocrisy Hysteria I Love Italians I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan Ibn Khaldun Ibo Ice T Iceland Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview Idiocracy Igbo Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Immigration immigration-policy-terminology Immigriping Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income Incompetence India India Genetics Indian Economy Indian Genetics Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-European Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Infrastructure Intellectuals Intelligence Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Relations Internet Internet Research Agency Interracial Interracial Marriage Intersectionality Interviews Introgression Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Lazaridis Iosif Stalin Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland IRGC Is It Good For The Jews? Is Love Colorblind ISIS ISIS. Terrorism Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Islamophobiaphobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation Israeli Settlements Israeli Spying IT Italy It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Jack Keane Jair Bolsonaro Jake Tapper Jamaica Jamal Khashoggi James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Wooley Jane Mayer Janet Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Malloy JASTA JCPOA ¡Jeb! Jeb Bush Jefferson County Jeffrey Goldberg Jennifer Rubin Jeremy Corbyn Jerrold Nadler Jerry Seinfeld Jesuits Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jill Stein Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman John Allen John B. Watson John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John Durant John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Hughes John Kasich John Kerry John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Tooby Jonah Goldberg Jonathan Freedland Jordan Peterson Joseph Tainter Journalism Judaism Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Harris Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Kaboom Kalash Kamala On Her Knees Katz Kay Bailey Hutchison Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kenneth Pomeranz Kennewick Man Kerry Killinger Kevin MacDonald Kevin Mitchell Kevin Williamson Khashoggi Kids Kim Jong Un Kin Selection Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kremlin Clans Kris Kobach Ku Klux Klan Kurds LA Language Languages Las Vegas Massacre Late Obama Age Collapse Late Ov Latin America Latinos Latvia Law Law Laws Of Behavioral Genetics Lazy Glossophiliac Lead Poisoning Learning Lebanon Leda Cosmides Lee Kuan Yew Lenin Leonard Bernstein Lesbians Lèse-diversité LGBT Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya Life life-expectancy Lifestyle Light Skin Preference Lindsay Graham Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Lloyd Blankfein Localism Logan's Run Longevity Loooong Books Looting Lorde Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Lover Boys Lyndon Johnson M Factor M.g. Machiavellianism Mad Men Madeleine Albright Madoff Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Homosexuality Mall Malnutrition Malthusianism Manor Manorialism Manspreading Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Map Posts maps Marc Faber Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen mark-adomanis Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Marriage Marta Martin Luther King Marwan Barghouti Marxism Masculinity Masha Gessen Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Mate Choice Math Mathematics Matt Forney Matthew Weiner Max Blumenthal Max Boot Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Mcdonald's 365Black Measurement Error Media Media Bias Medicine Medvedev Mega-Aggressions Megan McCain Mein Obama MEK Memorial Day Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Illness Mental Traits Merciless Indian Savages Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Mesolithic Mexican-American War Mexico MH 17 Michael Flynn Michael Jackson Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michael Vick Michael Weiss Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Microsoft Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mikhail Khodorkovsky Militarization Military Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millionaires Milner Group Mindset Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Misdreavus Missile Defense Missing The Point Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Model Minority Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Money Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Moxie MTDNA Mulatto Elite Multiculturalism Multiregionalism Music Muslim Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini Mutual Assured Destruction Myanmar NAEP NAMs Nancy Pelosi Nancy Segal Narendra Modi NASA Natalism Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Question National Review National Security State National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Selection Nature Nature Vs. Nurture Navy Standards Naz Shah Nazism NBA Neandertal Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Ned Flanders Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neolithic Revolution Neoreaction Nerds Netherlands Neuroscience New Atheists New Cold War New Orleans New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand Shooting News Newspeak NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nobel Prized #NobelsSoWhiteMale Nordics Norman Braman North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway #NotOkay Novorossiya Novorossiya Sitrep NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nutrition O Mio Babbino Caro Obama Presidency Obamacare Obese Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Butterknife Occam's Razor Occam's Rubber Room Occupy October Surprise Oil Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders Operational Sex Ratio Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Original Memes Orissa Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Orwellian Language Osama Bin Laden OTFI Out-of-Africa Out Of Africa Model Outbreeding Paekchong Pakistan Pakistani Paleoanthropology Paleolibertarianism Paleolithic Paleolithic Europeans Paleontology Palestine Palestinians Palin Pamela Geller Panhandling Paper Review Parasite Manipulation Parenting Parenting Parenting Behavioral Genetics Paris Attacks Parsi Parsi Genetics Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Ewald Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Pax Americana Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Peoria Perception Management Personal Personal Genomics Personal Use Personality Peter Frost Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pets Pew Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philip Breedlove Philippines Philosophy Philosophy Of Science Phylogenetics Pigmentation Pigs Piketty Pioneer Hypothesis Piracy PISA Pizzagate Planned Parenthood POC Ascendancy Poland Police Police State Police Training Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Political Philosophy Politicians Polling Polygamy Polygenic Score Polygyny Poor Reading Skills Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Population Structure Population Substructure Populism Porn Pornography Portugal Post-Modernism Poverty PRC Pre-Obama America Prediction Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Press Censorship Prince Bandar Priti Patel Privatization Productivity Profiling Progressives Projection Pronoun Crisis Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Pubertal Timing Public Health Public Schools Public Transportation Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome Pygmies Qatar Quakers Quality Of Life Quantitative Genetics Quebec R. A. Fisher Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ race-realism Race Riots Rachel Maddow Racial Intelligence Racial Reality Racialism Racism Racist Objects Menace Racist Pumpkin Incident Radical Islam Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Raqqa Rashida Tlaib Rationality Razib Khan Reader Survey Reading Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red State Blue State redlining Redneck Dunkirk Refugee Boy Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome #RefugeesWelcomeInQatar Regression To The Mean Religion Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Replication Reprint Republican Party Republicans Reuel Gerecht Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Dyer Richard Goldberg Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Russell Riots Ritholtz R/k Theory Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Lindsay Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert Plomin Robert Spencer Robots Rohingya Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Rome Romney Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rove Roy Moore RT International Rudy Giuliani Rurik's Seed Russia-Georgia War Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Economy Russian Elections 2018 Russian Far East Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russian Society Russophobes Saakashvili sabermetrics Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Same-sex Marriage San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf Sarah Palin Sarin Gas SAT Saudi Arabia Saying What You Have To Say Scandinavia Schizophrenia Science Denialism Science Fiction Science Fiction & Fantasy Scotland Scots Irish Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Seeking Happiness Select Select Post Selection Self Indulgence Self-Obsession Separating The Truth From The Nonsense Serbia Sergei Magnitsky Sergei Skripal Sergey Brin Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sex Recognition Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Division Of Labor Sexual Selection Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Shared Environment Shekhovstov Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shmuley Boteach Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shurat HaDin Sibel Edmonds Sigar Pearl Mandelker Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Six Day War SJWs Skin Color Skin Tone Slate Slave Trade Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek SLC24A5 Sleep Smart Fraction Smoking Soccer Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sociopathy Sociosexuality Solar Energy Solutions Solzhenitsyn Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Southern Poverty Law Center Sovereignty Soviet History Soviet Union Space Space Command Space Exploration Space Program Spain Speculation SPLC Sport Sputnik News Srebrenica Stabby Somali Stacey Abrams Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Comparisons State Department State Formation States Rights Statistics Statue Of Liberty Statue Of Libertyism Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve King Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Steve's Rice Thresher Columns Strategic Affairs Ministry Stuart Levey Stuff White People Like SU-57 Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suicide Super Soaker Supercomputers Superintelligence Supreme Court Survey Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Syed Farook syr Syrian Civil War Syriza T.S. Eliot Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taki Taliban Tamil Nadu Tashfeen Malik Tax Cuts Tax Evasion Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Television Terrorists Tesla Test Scores Testing Testosterone Tests Texas Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn "the Blacks" The Blank Slate The Breeder's Equation The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Economist The Eight Banditos The Family The Future The Kissing Billionaire The Left The Megaphone The New York Times The Scramble For America The Son Also Rises The South The States The Washington Post The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Thermoeconomics Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thomas Perez Thomas Talhelm Thor Tidewater Tiger Mom Tiger Woods Tim Tebow TIMSS TNC Tom Cotton Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling Trope Derangement Syndrome Tropical Humans True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tsarnaev Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks Tuskegee TWA 800 Twin Study Twins Twintuition Twitter UK Ukrainian Crisis Unanswerable Questions Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Union United Kingdom Universal Basic Income Universalism unwordly Upper Paleolithic Urbanization US Blacks US Civil War II US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Military US Regionalism US-Russia.org Expert Discussion Panel USA Used Car Dealers Moral Superiority Of USS Liberty Uttar Pradesh Uyghurs Vaginal Yeast Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victor Canfield Victoria Nuland Victorian England Victorianism Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Violence Vioxx Virtual World Visual Word Form Area Vitamin D Vladimir Putin Voronezh Vote Fraud Voting Rights Vulcan Society Wal-Mart Wall Street Walmart War War In Donbass War On Terror Warhammer Washington Post WasPage Watson Waugh Wealth Wealth Inequality Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Western Decline Western Europe Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White White America White Americans White Death White Decline White Flight White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nationalism White Nationalists White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Is The Fairest Of Them All? Who Whom Wikileaks Wild Life William Browder William Buckley William D. Hamilton William Fulbright William Kristol WINEP Winston Churchill Women Women In The Workplace Wonderlic Test Woodley Effect Woodrow Wilson WORDSUM Work Workers Working Class World Cup World Values Survey World War G World War I World War III World War T World War Weed Wretched Refuseism Writing WSHH WSJ WTO WVS Xi Jinping Y Chromosome Yamnaya Yankees Yemen Yochi Dreazen Yogi Berra's Restaurant YouTube Youtube Ban Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zika Zika Virus Zimbabwe Zionism Zombies
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
 All / On "Pavel Grudinin"
    Israel Shamir argues that Pavel Grudinin doing relatively well east of the Urals - then declining in the (much more populated) European Russia - constitutes evidence of fraud. This is unlikely to be true, since all the statisticians who regularly analyze Russian electoral fraud - needless to say, virtually all of them anti-Putin - agree...
  • I am genuinely grateful to the owner of this website who
    has shared this enormous paragraph at at this place.

  • What’s up colleagues, pleasant article and nice arguments commented at this place, I
    am truly ebjoying by these.

  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @jilles dykstra
    Alas, I stayed with USA friends, well educated middle class, where CNN was the only 'news' source.
    Three other USA acquaintances I visited in their homes, cannot remember having seen a newspaper other than a local one about marriages and funerals.
    The USA reminded me of the Peking court, that, when British warships were reported on the coast, responded with 'there had been so many pirates already'.
    In the Badlands, in a very small café, I identified myself as Dutch, from Holland, Netherlands.
    When all this did not ring bell I mentioned Europe, the first time in my life.
    This was understood.

    It’s the “ well educated middle “ class who watch and believe CNN and the rest of the liberal propaganda channels.

    They are the brainwashed morons who believe what they see on TV and in the
    “Quality” press; NYTimes, The Nation Atlantic, New Republic etc.

    If you want to know what the really intelligent Americans who know that all the quality press and CNN are just a lot of lying propaganda,think, keep hanging out in this site, Amren vdare and you will find dissident realistic truthful news.

    Of course these sites are kept going by uneducated redneck hillbilly manual workers and other deplorable losers to immigrant workers at all levels from dishwasher to Dr.

    The more educated an American is, the more he or she believes CNN and the rest of the lying press.

    • Agree: bluedog
  • @Medvedev
    I'm the last person to support Putin unless there is other worthy candidate. But dishonesty and idiocy of the claims against Russia often astonishes me.
    Russian meddling in the US elections ... Fake Russian Facebook Accounts Bought $100,000 in Political Ads
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/06/technology/facebook-russian-political-ads.html
    Is this even for real? Clinton's campaign cost 1.4 bln or 1,400,000,000.00 dollars. Even half a million would be a drop in a bucket.
    But if someone isn't completely ret*rded and thinks for a minute. Wouldn't Russian intelligence services try to cover up the traces and use money stashed in foreign country or offshore zone?

    Are you the one who did borrow the bicycle?

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • @melanf

    It never would occur to me to think about Zhirik’s sex life, but when I asked someone who usually knows about these things if it’s true about his homosexuality, I was told, “everyone knows that.”
     
    Not everyone. I read about it for the first time in my life.

    Not everyone. I read about it for the first time in my life.

    I read it in trolling comments a few times over years – for example, I guess some Ukrainian comments on YouTube.

  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:
    @Medvedev
    I'm the last person to support Putin unless there is other worthy candidate. But dishonesty and idiocy of the claims against Russia often astonishes me.
    Russian meddling in the US elections ... Fake Russian Facebook Accounts Bought $100,000 in Political Ads
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/06/technology/facebook-russian-political-ads.html
    Is this even for real? Clinton's campaign cost 1.4 bln or 1,400,000,000.00 dollars. Even half a million would be a drop in a bucket.
    But if someone isn't completely ret*rded and thinks for a minute. Wouldn't Russian intelligence services try to cover up the traces and use money stashed in foreign country or offshore zone?

    Anon from TN
    The majority of the populace in any country is quite dumb. No state propaganda (USSR, USA, UK, Germany, you name them, they are all the same) ever targets the smart fraction of the populace. It is crafted for the lowest common denominator, i.e., “an average Joe” with limited mental ability (ret*rded, using your term).

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • @JL
    I have a lot of respect for Zhirinovsky, he's played an important role in Russian politics for decades now. He's entertaining, smart and generally calls it like he sees it. What he does in his private life is irrelevant to all this anyway.

    But his career is probably in its twilight now, and his poor showing in the election is a symptom. This makes him vulnerable. The point wasn't that the piderast journalist is telling the truth, but that he felt he could even make such an accusation publicly and that he chose now to do do. It never would occur to me to think about Zhirik's sex life, but when I asked someone who usually knows about these things if it's true about his homosexuality, I was told, "everyone knows that."

    It never would occur to me to think about Zhirik’s sex life, but when I asked someone who usually knows about these things if it’s true about his homosexuality, I was told, “everyone knows that.”

    Not everyone. I read about it for the first time in my life.

    • Replies: @Dmitry

    Not everyone. I read about it for the first time in my life.

     

    I read it in trolling comments a few times over years - for example, I guess some Ukrainian comments on YouTube.
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    GRUDININ HAS SHAVED HIS MUSTACHE AFTER ALL.

    https://cdni.rt.com/russian/images/2018.03/article/5ab61ca0183561f9528b4578.png

    Good man.
    He deserved his double digit result.

  • GRUDININ HAS SHAVED HIS MUSTACHE AFTER ALL.

    • Replies: @Mitleser
    Good man.
    He deserved his double digit result.
  • JL says:
    @Dmitry
    He's married with a wife and grandkids. So while it's not impossible that he is gay, there's not exactly vast or overwhelming evidence that he is gay, on the basis that a Muslim liberal journalist, who lives in the West (i.e. everything that would want to take down Zhirinovsky), says he once touched his back during an interview ten years ago.

    I have a lot of respect for Zhirinovsky, he’s played an important role in Russian politics for decades now. He’s entertaining, smart and generally calls it like he sees it. What he does in his private life is irrelevant to all this anyway.

    But his career is probably in its twilight now, and his poor showing in the election is a symptom. This makes him vulnerable. The point wasn’t that the piderast journalist is telling the truth, but that he felt he could even make such an accusation publicly and that he chose now to do do. It never would occur to me to think about Zhirik’s sex life, but when I asked someone who usually knows about these things if it’s true about his homosexuality, I was told, “everyone knows that.”

    • Replies: @melanf

    It never would occur to me to think about Zhirik’s sex life, but when I asked someone who usually knows about these things if it’s true about his homosexuality, I was told, “everyone knows that.”
     
    Not everyone. I read about it for the first time in my life.
  • OT

    The Hungarian election seems difficult to predict because there is little openly available detailed precinct level data, and also because it’s difficult to measure second preferences and the likelihood of people voting for candidates other than that of their most preferred parties. It’s also difficult to predict turnout, and the Fidesz victory or its size greatly depends on turnout: basically, the lower the turnout, the higher the portion of the votes going to Fidesz. The most likely guess is still a Fidesz win without winning a supermajority, though there’s always the chance of a Fidesz supermajority and also of a Fidesz loss. The March 15 speech of Orbán threatening some unspecified people with retribution was unhelpful in that it could mobilize the opposition voters. The fact that now there seems to be a chance of beating him will probably also mobilize opposition voters.

  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @Medvedev
    No need to tell me))) Total agree with you!
    But what amazes me that Western powers think (not without a reason) that their people are completely ret*rded to believe in blatant lies.
    How ret*rded does one have to be to believe that Russian intelligence services or FSB would kill someone with Novichok? It doesn't make sense. Wouldn't they try to cover it up? Even a 4-year old tries to cover up his mischief from the parents. So, wouldn't you expect intelligence services of Russia to be a little bit more intelligent than an average 4-year old boy?
    At least British authorities haven't found a postcard "From Russian FSB with love" near the body. Otherwise, it could have served as 100% evidence against Russia.

    I’m the last person to support Putin unless there is other worthy candidate. But dishonesty and idiocy of the claims against Russia often astonishes me.
    Russian meddling in the US elections … Fake Russian Facebook Accounts Bought $100,000 in Political Ads
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/06/technology/facebook-russian-political-ads.html
    Is this even for real? Clinton’s campaign cost 1.4 bln or 1,400,000,000.00 dollars. Even half a million would be a drop in a bucket.
    But if someone isn’t completely ret*rded and thinks for a minute. Wouldn’t Russian intelligence services try to cover up the traces and use money stashed in foreign country or offshore zone?

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    The majority of the populace in any country is quite dumb. No state propaganda (USSR, USA, UK, Germany, you name them, they are all the same) ever targets the smart fraction of the populace. It is crafted for the lowest common denominator, i.e., “an average Joe” with limited mental ability (ret*rded, using your term).
    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Are you the one who did borrow the bicycle?
  • @EugeneGur

    How about proper investigation, fact checking, trying to be impartial for a sec in order to find the actual offender? Nah, too hard.
     
    That is all fine and good provided there ever was an offender and there was in fact a crime committed. Perhaps, this was all staged; nobody was poisoned, or if there was, it happened with the full knowledge and approval of the appropriate UK authorities.

    This seems to be the most logical explanation, and all this talk about "Novichok", chemical weapons and such is just a smokescreen. The explanation that this was a false flag operation is the only one fully consistent with the behavior of the UK government. Even assuming the UK politicians are dumb, they can't possibly be that dumb not to be able to predict the Russian reaction to an ultimatum. They'd only do that if they in fact didn't want any information or cooperation but wanted to start a quarrel right away. A total absence of all Western ambassadors at the briefing by the Russian Foreign Ministry the other day confirms the theory.

    The UK did everything possible to obfuscate the matter, so chances are we'll never know what, if anything, really happened. Any information and/or samples coming now from the UK authorities is obviously suspect, since there is no way to know where in fact they are coming from. This is the same pattern used many a time before in Syria, in Litvinenko case, in the MH17 "investigation", etc.

    No need to tell me))) Total agree with you!
    But what amazes me that Western powers think (not without a reason) that their people are completely ret*rded to believe in blatant lies.
    How ret*rded does one have to be to believe that Russian intelligence services or FSB would kill someone with Novichok? It doesn’t make sense. Wouldn’t they try to cover it up? Even a 4-year old tries to cover up his mischief from the parents. So, wouldn’t you expect intelligence services of Russia to be a little bit more intelligent than an average 4-year old boy?
    At least British authorities haven’t found a postcard “From Russian FSB with love” near the body. Otherwise, it could have served as 100% evidence against Russia.

    • Replies: @Medvedev
    I'm the last person to support Putin unless there is other worthy candidate. But dishonesty and idiocy of the claims against Russia often astonishes me.
    Russian meddling in the US elections ... Fake Russian Facebook Accounts Bought $100,000 in Political Ads
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/06/technology/facebook-russian-political-ads.html
    Is this even for real? Clinton's campaign cost 1.4 bln or 1,400,000,000.00 dollars. Even half a million would be a drop in a bucket.
    But if someone isn't completely ret*rded and thinks for a minute. Wouldn't Russian intelligence services try to cover up the traces and use money stashed in foreign country or offshore zone?
  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • @JL

    I voted for Zhirinovsky
     
    Commenter 5371 (if I remember the digits correctly) recently stated in a different thread that Zhirinovsky is a homosexual. I found the assertion intriguing, as it was the first time I'd heard it. Well, lo and behold, as part of Russia's current mini-Weinsteingate scandal, Zhirik is now being publicly accused of sexual harassment by an openly gay male journalist. How ironic that Russia's nationalist champion is a homosexual Jewish lawyer, something akin to a Russian Roy Cohn.

    He’s married with a wife and grandkids. So while it’s not impossible that he is gay, there’s not exactly vast or overwhelming evidence that he is gay, on the basis that a Muslim liberal journalist, who lives in the West (i.e. everything that would want to take down Zhirinovsky), says he once touched his back during an interview ten years ago.

    • Agree: melanf
    • Replies: @JL
    I have a lot of respect for Zhirinovsky, he's played an important role in Russian politics for decades now. He's entertaining, smart and generally calls it like he sees it. What he does in his private life is irrelevant to all this anyway.

    But his career is probably in its twilight now, and his poor showing in the election is a symptom. This makes him vulnerable. The point wasn't that the piderast journalist is telling the truth, but that he felt he could even make such an accusation publicly and that he chose now to do do. It never would occur to me to think about Zhirik's sex life, but when I asked someone who usually knows about these things if it's true about his homosexuality, I was told, "everyone knows that."
  • Israel Shamir argues that Pavel Grudinin doing relatively well east of the Urals - then declining in the (much more populated) European Russia - constitutes evidence of fraud. This is unlikely to be true, since all the statisticians who regularly analyze Russian electoral fraud - needless to say, virtually all of them anti-Putin - agree...
  • Why Did Grudinin Do Well in the East?

    Meme candidates always do well in the Russian East, in every election. (Previously Zhirinovsky used to do well there, back when he was the memiest politician in Russia. He’s old and tired now, so Grudinin it is.)

  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @Sean
    Our country, our rules, Russians can go back where they came from. If they don't shut up, we'll take their dirty money, because we can get at those offshore accounts, if we chose to.

    Voice of an Israel-firster?
    Was not Israel involved in nudging the US towards “humanitarian interventions” in seven countries, all according to the criminal Oded Yinon plan? https://consortiumnews.com/2018/03/22/how-many-millions-of-people-have-been-killed-in-americas-post-9-11-wars-part-one-iraq/
    “…about 2.4 million people have probably been killed in Iraq as a result of the historic act of aggression committed by the U.S. and U.K. in 2003. …
    The 2006 Lancet study estimated that about 601,000 Iraqis were killed in the first 39 months of war and occupation in Iraq, while the war had also caused about 54,000 non-violent deaths.
    … at least 40,000 civilians were killed in the bombardment of Mosul alone. .. there were probably many more bodies buried in the rubble…
    On the 15th anniversary of the illegal invasion of Iraq, the Center for Constitutional Rights in the U.S. renewed its call for the U.S. to pay war reparations to the people of Iraq. [You know — like Germany has been paying the reparations to Jews].
    The world will never hold major American and British war criminals accountable for their crimes as long as the public does not understand the full scale and horror of what they have done. And the world will not know peace as long as the most powerful aggressors can count on impunity for “the supreme international crime.”Samar Hassan screamed after her parents were killed by U.S. soldiers in Iraq in 2005. Credit Chris Hondros/Getty Images.

  • Israel Shamir argues that Pavel Grudinin doing relatively well east of the Urals - then declining in the (much more populated) European Russia - constitutes evidence of fraud. This is unlikely to be true, since all the statisticians who regularly analyze Russian electoral fraud - needless to say, virtually all of them anti-Putin - agree...
  • anon[241] • Disclaimer says:

    As I have often pointed out, Grudinin was easily the most pro-Ukrainian candidate – as in the least interested in supporting the Donbass – besides the liberals Sobchak and Yavlinsky.

    “Pavel Grudinin, a presidential candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, said he was in favor of recognizing the independence of the People’s Republic of Donetsk and the People’s Republic of Lugansk, as well as the possibility of reuniting Donbass with Russia if the residents of the region wanted to do so.

    Of course, the Minsk Agreements played an important role in ending the genocide of the population of these republics. But the fighting there continues, albeit not with so many casualties among civilians. Bandera-lovers daily shell the cities and villages of therepublics, as a result of which ordinary people suffer and die. The Minsk agreements have turned into a sort of screen for the preparation of a forceful solution to the “problem of Novorossia.”
    https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/01/grudinin-kprf-presidential-candidate/

  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @MarkU
    Are people not entitled to a little indignation if they are unreasonably slighted?

    Anon from TN
    If you mean May, Johnson, or Williamson, they are being slighted very reasonably. Britain never had such hopeless nonentities in leadership in my memory. Compared to these, John Major looks like a towering giant.

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • JL says:

    I voted for Zhirinovsky

    Commenter 5371 (if I remember the digits correctly) recently stated in a different thread that Zhirinovsky is a homosexual. I found the assertion intriguing, as it was the first time I’d heard it. Well, lo and behold, as part of Russia’s current mini-Weinsteingate scandal, Zhirik is now being publicly accused of sexual harassment by an openly gay male journalist. How ironic that Russia’s nationalist champion is a homosexual Jewish lawyer, something akin to a Russian Roy Cohn.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    He's married with a wife and grandkids. So while it's not impossible that he is gay, there's not exactly vast or overwhelming evidence that he is gay, on the basis that a Muslim liberal journalist, who lives in the West (i.e. everything that would want to take down Zhirinovsky), says he once touched his back during an interview ten years ago.
  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @Sean
    Our country, our rules, Russians can go back where they came from. If they don't shut up, we'll take their dirty money, because we can get at those offshore accounts, if we chose to.

    We? Sounds like you’ll soon be rolling in Russian dough. Lucky you Sean, you might consider investing some of it in seeing a shrink.

  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    As the Romans used to say (sometimes this phrase is claimed to belong to Prometheus), “Iuppiter iratus ergo nefas” (Jupiter, you are angry, therefore you are wrong).

    Are people not entitled to a little indignation if they are unreasonably slighted?

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    If you mean May, Johnson, or Williamson, they are being slighted very reasonably. Britain never had such hopeless nonentities in leadership in my memory. Compared to these, John Major looks like a towering giant.
  • @Sean
    No, the UK is snow whit in all this. Nobody is listening to what Russian diplomats have to say any more. And the Western investment funds will stop investing in Russia because it will be too risky now there is talk of sequestrating Russian dirty money.

    They are going after high returns so they accept the risk, but it will turn out to be a much bigger risk than they realise. Russia needs technology transfer from the West, and that can easily be stopped.

  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    As the American saying goes, follow the money. I have no doubt that the votes were motivated by $$$. However, this could have been direct (lobbying, which would be a criminal offence everywhere but remains perfectly legal in the US), or indirect, via jobs weapons manufacturers provide locally, etc.

    Perhaps I must be more clear.

    Nobody’s disputing the money angle, and it’s both direct and indirect. The direct MIC $$$ (campaign contributions) is miniscule compared to the indirect [jobs in defense industry in every congressional district]. The USA economy runs on blood. Bernie Sanders, the pseudo peacemaker, loves his F-35 in Vermont.

    However, the heavy-duty lobbying is the demonization of Iran and the allegation that the Houthis are an Iranian proxy. This is a largely Zionist project, abetted now by KSA. The Israel Lobby, via the media, promotes fear and hatred of Iran, so the public then accepts the war policy.

    Plus, the public barely knows about our wars and their consequences. The MIC, media, the Israel Lobby [the Deep State] has no interest in accurate exposure.

  • @Sean
    No, the UK is snow whit in all this. Nobody is listening to what Russian diplomats have to say any more. And the Western investment funds will stop investing in Russia because it will be too risky now there is talk of sequestrating Russian dirty money.

    Anon from TN
    Sorry to disappoint, but you are a bit too late. Just now Russia sold $4 billion worth of Eurobonds. British investors bought 39%, US investors – 25%. They obviously forgot to consult you. A pity.

    • LOL: bluedog
  • @jilles dykstra
    No.
    We yesterday had our municipal elections, and our last referendum, the law that makes referenda possible has been abolished.
    For 'good' reason, any time we can vote in a referendum we vote against government policy, without any effect.
    2005 we voted against the EU, two years ago against the EU Ukraine association treaty, this, the last time, against the law that makes it possible for our secret services to spy legally on anyone.
    The result of ignoring us was clear yesterday, the big losers were the national governing parties, the winners local parties.
    Like Germany and Belgium, it becomes more and more difficult to govern our country.
    In all three countries it took more than half a year to form a stable government, in our case, as with the two previous Rutte governments, with a parliamentary majority of one seat.
    Next year we have our provincial elections, in fact elections for the higher, and smaller second parliament.
    I expect that will be the end of Rutte, what then will emerge; no idea.

    Well, thanks for that first word, which was at least a reply to my question.

  • @EugeneGur

    How about proper investigation, fact checking, trying to be impartial for a sec in order to find the actual offender? Nah, too hard.
     
    That is all fine and good provided there ever was an offender and there was in fact a crime committed. Perhaps, this was all staged; nobody was poisoned, or if there was, it happened with the full knowledge and approval of the appropriate UK authorities.

    This seems to be the most logical explanation, and all this talk about "Novichok", chemical weapons and such is just a smokescreen. The explanation that this was a false flag operation is the only one fully consistent with the behavior of the UK government. Even assuming the UK politicians are dumb, they can't possibly be that dumb not to be able to predict the Russian reaction to an ultimatum. They'd only do that if they in fact didn't want any information or cooperation but wanted to start a quarrel right away. A total absence of all Western ambassadors at the briefing by the Russian Foreign Ministry the other day confirms the theory.

    The UK did everything possible to obfuscate the matter, so chances are we'll never know what, if anything, really happened. Any information and/or samples coming now from the UK authorities is obviously suspect, since there is no way to know where in fact they are coming from. This is the same pattern used many a time before in Syria, in Litvinenko case, in the MH17 "investigation", etc.

    No, the UK is snow whit in all this. Nobody is listening to what Russian diplomats have to say any more. And the Western investment funds will stop investing in Russia because it will be too risky now there is talk of sequestrating Russian dirty money.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Sorry to disappoint, but you are a bit too late. Just now Russia sold $4 billion worth of Eurobonds. British investors bought 39%, US investors – 25%. They obviously forgot to consult you. A pity.
    , @Sean
    They are going after high returns so they accept the risk, but it will turn out to be a much bigger risk than they realise. Russia needs technology transfer from the West, and that can easily be stopped.
  • Our country, our rules, Russians can go back where they came from. If they don’t shut up, we’ll take their dirty money, because we can get at those offshore accounts, if we chose to.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    We? Sounds like you'll soon be rolling in Russian dough. Lucky you Sean, you might consider investing some of it in seeing a shrink.
    , @annamaria
    Voice of an Israel-firster?
    Was not Israel involved in nudging the US towards "humanitarian interventions" in seven countries, all according to the criminal Oded Yinon plan? https://consortiumnews.com/2018/03/22/how-many-millions-of-people-have-been-killed-in-americas-post-9-11-wars-part-one-iraq/
    "...about 2.4 million people have probably been killed in Iraq as a result of the historic act of aggression committed by the U.S. and U.K. in 2003. ...
    The 2006 Lancet study estimated that about 601,000 Iraqis were killed in the first 39 months of war and occupation in Iraq, while the war had also caused about 54,000 non-violent deaths.
    ... at least 40,000 civilians were killed in the bombardment of Mosul alone. .. there were probably many more bodies buried in the rubble...
    On the 15th anniversary of the illegal invasion of Iraq, the Center for Constitutional Rights in the U.S. renewed its call for the U.S. to pay war reparations to the people of Iraq. [You know -- like Germany has been paying the reparations to Jews].
    The world will never hold major American and British war criminals accountable for their crimes as long as the public does not understand the full scale and horror of what they have done. And the world will not know peace as long as the most powerful aggressors can count on impunity for “the supreme international crime.”
    https://consortiumnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/PHOTO-2-jumbo.jpg
    Samar Hassan screamed after her parents were killed by U.S. soldiers in Iraq in 2005. Credit Chris Hondros/Getty Images.
  • @Medvedev
    Dishonesty, hysteria and russophobia of the West helps to propel Putin's support among Russians during elections. If it hadn't been for the West Putin support might have sunk long ago. What do we have as a result? Even if the elections were rigged a bit the second and the third candidate with the most voter support are definitively not pro-Western.
    Here's piece of news about Russia https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/03/21/us-russian-crew-blasts-of-for-the-iss-from-kazakhstan/ If Russians are so evil why do we collaborate with them? Why do we use their help to send astronauts to space? But most mainstream media doesn't report news like this. Instead we get constant bashing of Russia in the media, Russian collusion, Russian meddling in the US elections, chemical attack in Syria, Russians intelligence services (or whoever) killing people in London etc.
    How about proper investigation, fact checking, trying to be impartial for a sec in order to find the actual offender? Nah, too hard. Let's just show some photos of children in Syria and bomb the sh*t out of Assad. Or declare murder in London as Russian attack on UK sovereignty and expel all Russian diplomats.

    How about proper investigation, fact checking, trying to be impartial for a sec in order to find the actual offender? Nah, too hard.

    That is all fine and good provided there ever was an offender and there was in fact a crime committed. Perhaps, this was all staged; nobody was poisoned, or if there was, it happened with the full knowledge and approval of the appropriate UK authorities.

    This seems to be the most logical explanation, and all this talk about “Novichok”, chemical weapons and such is just a smokescreen. The explanation that this was a false flag operation is the only one fully consistent with the behavior of the UK government. Even assuming the UK politicians are dumb, they can’t possibly be that dumb not to be able to predict the Russian reaction to an ultimatum. They’d only do that if they in fact didn’t want any information or cooperation but wanted to start a quarrel right away. A total absence of all Western ambassadors at the briefing by the Russian Foreign Ministry the other day confirms the theory.

    The UK did everything possible to obfuscate the matter, so chances are we’ll never know what, if anything, really happened. Any information and/or samples coming now from the UK authorities is obviously suspect, since there is no way to know where in fact they are coming from. This is the same pattern used many a time before in Syria, in Litvinenko case, in the MH17 “investigation”, etc.

    • Replies: @Sean
    No, the UK is snow whit in all this. Nobody is listening to what Russian diplomats have to say any more. And the Western investment funds will stop investing in Russia because it will be too risky now there is talk of sequestrating Russian dirty money.
    , @Medvedev
    No need to tell me))) Total agree with you!
    But what amazes me that Western powers think (not without a reason) that their people are completely ret*rded to believe in blatant lies.
    How ret*rded does one have to be to believe that Russian intelligence services or FSB would kill someone with Novichok? It doesn't make sense. Wouldn't they try to cover it up? Even a 4-year old tries to cover up his mischief from the parents. So, wouldn't you expect intelligence services of Russia to be a little bit more intelligent than an average 4-year old boy?
    At least British authorities haven't found a postcard "From Russian FSB with love" near the body. Otherwise, it could have served as 100% evidence against Russia.
  • AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:
    @RobinG
    Yesterday the US Senate voted to continue the genocide of Yemeni civilians.

    David Swanson gives a good account of how it went down, but IMO his attribution to $$$ is overly simplistic. There's also their brains washed with "evil Iran" propaganda.
    http://davidswanson.org/why-55-u-s-senators-voted-for-genocide-in-yemen/
    Why 55 U.S. Senators Voted for Genocide in Yemen

    Anon from TN
    As the American saying goes, follow the money. I have no doubt that the votes were motivated by $$$. However, this could have been direct (lobbying, which would be a criminal offence everywhere but remains perfectly legal in the US), or indirect, via jobs weapons manufacturers provide locally, etc.

    • Replies: @RobinG
    Perhaps I must be more clear.

    Nobody's disputing the money angle, and it's both direct and indirect. The direct MIC $$$ (campaign contributions) is miniscule compared to the indirect [jobs in defense industry in every congressional district]. The USA economy runs on blood. Bernie Sanders, the pseudo peacemaker, loves his F-35 in Vermont.

    However, the heavy-duty lobbying is the demonization of Iran and the allegation that the Houthis are an Iranian proxy. This is a largely Zionist project, abetted now by KSA. The Israel Lobby, via the media, promotes fear and hatred of Iran, so the public then accepts the war policy.

    Plus, the public barely knows about our wars and their consequences. The MIC, media, the Israel Lobby [the Deep State] has no interest in accurate exposure.
  • @jilles dykstra
    What surprised me most in the USA was, when staying at the homes of USA friends with good, even university education, was their ignorance.
    A former university history professor talked to me about the USA Civil War, he was flabbergasted when I showed little interest, stating that in Europe we had had wars all the time.
    A more or less well known USA writer, of non fiction, I saw reading the Readers Digest.
    A high school teacher just watched CNN.
    On the other hand, in e mail discussions with USA veterans, Korea and Vietnam, they knew quite well how they had been fooled, even, Vietnam, how the USA had committed war crimes.
    But who in the USA understands that FDR wanted war since he was brought into politics, 1932, ad deliberately provoked Pearl Harbour ?
    Yet the books explaining this, written by USA historians, or for example in the diaries of Lindbergh, exist.
    Who read the diaries of Harold L Ickes, where one can find that Britain had to pay the price of the Balfour Declaration, in order to be saved from capitulation in November 1917 ?
    But let me admit, before retirement gave me the opportunity to read widely, I also did not doubt what quality media told us.
    I now see our media as the Germans see theirs, Lügenpresse, literally 'lies press'.
    In reaction the EU has begun censoring internet, fake news.

    Anon from TN
    Well, it is Lügenpresse everywhere. It cannot be anything else when the same elites wholly own MSM and all branches of government. Founding Fathers must be turning in their graves.

  • @Sin City Milla
    I spend hours each day in a lunch spot that blares CNN. I always turn my back to the screen n put on headphones since I don't have time to re-verify simple facts like the sky is blue, facts which PravdCNN constantly seeks to bring into doubt.

    From my backward seat I get to observe the lunchgoers as they consume CNN-fare along with their lunch-fare, without myself having the misfortune of having to hear CNN or see the screen.

    What I see is extraordinary. People of all sorts sit n eat n stare with goggle eyes clearly sinking into an hypnotic state. Some stare with their mouths open. Some even forget to eat. Many become agitated n after leaving rush back to view the screen a second time. The shop employees are obsessed with it n often run to the screen to turn up the volume as if some great world crisis were erupting. Others swear n curse. This goes on for hours. Professional types, middle class people, even bums pause from their prohibited panhandling all stop n stare n absorb n clearly believe whatever the heck the screen is saying. None ever read books, they just sit n stare n react.

    On those rare occasions when I waste a moment by turning to look at the screen to verify that WW3 has truly broken out, all I ever see is Wolf Blitzer holding sheets of paper n the word Trump inching across the screen. I always regret wasting the moment turning to look when I could have read a few more words in my book.

    Indoctrination via habituation n hypnosis seems to be the chief message of CNN. When I check genuine news sources later on I always find that WW3 did not break out, that Trump is still the President, that the sky is actually blue n not green or red or polka dot n has not magically transformed itself into cloud images of the Martyr Hillary in Gaea sympathy with PC Cultists' lamentations.

    Anon from TN
    Good description how the propaganda works. The ways and mechanisms are exactly the same in the USA, UK, Germany, etc., as they were in the USSR.

  • @Medvedev
    Dishonesty, hysteria and russophobia of the West helps to propel Putin's support among Russians during elections. If it hadn't been for the West Putin support might have sunk long ago. What do we have as a result? Even if the elections were rigged a bit the second and the third candidate with the most voter support are definitively not pro-Western.
    Here's piece of news about Russia https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/03/21/us-russian-crew-blasts-of-for-the-iss-from-kazakhstan/ If Russians are so evil why do we collaborate with them? Why do we use their help to send astronauts to space? But most mainstream media doesn't report news like this. Instead we get constant bashing of Russia in the media, Russian collusion, Russian meddling in the US elections, chemical attack in Syria, Russians intelligence services (or whoever) killing people in London etc.
    How about proper investigation, fact checking, trying to be impartial for a sec in order to find the actual offender? Nah, too hard. Let's just show some photos of children in Syria and bomb the sh*t out of Assad. Or declare murder in London as Russian attack on UK sovereignty and expel all Russian diplomats.

    Yesterday the US Senate voted to continue the genocide of Yemeni civilians.

    David Swanson gives a good account of how it went down, but IMO his attribution to $$$ is overly simplistic. There’s also their brains washed with “evil Iran” propaganda.
    http://davidswanson.org/why-55-u-s-senators-voted-for-genocide-in-yemen/
    Why 55 U.S. Senators Voted for Genocide in Yemen

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    As the American saying goes, follow the money. I have no doubt that the votes were motivated by $$$. However, this could have been direct (lobbying, which would be a criminal offence everywhere but remains perfectly legal in the US), or indirect, via jobs weapons manufacturers provide locally, etc.
  • Do you remember the terrible onslaught of the mainstream media on presidential candidate Donald Trump in 2016? Dozens of revelations about his fake hair, pussy grabbing, tax avoidance and what not; dozens of public polls proving that the nation wanted Hillary and hated Trump, opinion pieces convincing you that only racist white trash could think...
  • anon[241] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anatoly Karlin

    In that week’s time, Gru’s rating skyrocketed and almost reached that of President Putin.
     
    In the real world, as proxied by polls from virtually every reliable source (VCIOM, FOM, Navalny's polling outfit, and VCIOM prediction markets), Grudinin is marginally ahead of Zhirinovsky and would do very well to get just 12%.

    They are producers of goods for local consumption, and their interests do not coincide with those of the Putin (or Yeltsin) oligarchs.
     
    Here is who Grudinin produces for: "The funny thing about those Lenin Sovkhoz strawberries and apples is that they are very high quality and essentially an exclusive good, very difficult to find and actually buy, and expensive. So the commies are supplying Moscow hipsters and SWPLs with “locally grown, organic”. Which is more evidence to support the commie/liberal convergence theory."

    ... he is supported by Russian Nationalists, though his main alliance is with the KPRF (the mainstream Russian Communist Party).
     
    Some Russian nationalists support Grudinin (Boldyrev, Savelyev). Others - a much greater percentage - support Zhirinovsky, Baburin, or not participating in these pseudo-elections at all.

    There are a few sites allowing people to express their preference by “voting”; a biggish site of this sort is http://president-rf.ru/ where out of 180,000 voters 60% preferred Gru, and only 30% voted for President Putin.
     
    Online polls are worthless due to the ease which which they can be brigaded (as evidently happened in this case).

    I notice that in its "predictions" section, the site in question not just prominently but exclusively questions astrologers, mystics, and clairvoyants. Which should give one some idea of its usefulness and reliability.

    When the guns of the First World War struck, only the Russian Left, led by Vladimir Lenin, did not lose their heads, but led their country to the victory of socialist revolution. After 1917, for many years the Russian Left was the guiding star for the world Left.
     
    The "victory" of defeat in WW1, Communist democide, civil war, prodrazvyorstka, dismemberment of the Russian nation, a decade's worth of economic progress that would have happened anyway, etc., etc.

    The dismemberment of the Russian empire would have occurred anyway, and would have been even greater and faster without Bolshevism. 1991 would have been anticipated for 1918-9, without Lenin and Trtosky. Without communist ideology, there would be nothing to unite people without a common culture.
    As for economic development, it is unlikely that it would benefit from a survival of tsarist incompetence. And in the case of an anti-Bolshevik victory, progress would be seriously retarded. Koltchak’s troops massacred workers because they saw them as a threat. the white regime would certainly deindustrialize the country to curb the ‘red danger’, as did the Argentine military during its last period in power.

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • @bb.
    that's on the assumption that people MUST vote against Orban whoever is available. As far as I can tell, that's not automatically the case. Voter apathy might prevail as well, in which case Orban profits, or Jobbik, which is unhandshakeworthy more from the left than from the right anyways and just effectively block any coalition.

    Did the lefties in Hungary adapt anti-immigrationism yet? In Slovakia, the whole country is basically united in this case so it is not really a voter issue.

    Jobbik has drifted to the left. It’s now probably to the left of Fidesz, or at least not significantly to the right. Its relations with any of the leftist parties are better than Fidesz. By the way, Orbán tried to make it impossible for them to campaign. So they also hate Orbán now. And they are definitely not less handshakeworthy than Fidesz. They already engaged in talks to the leftist parties. The “new leftist” parties (untainted with governing 2002-10) actually probably like Jobbik more than the socialists or DK (a spinoff party of the socialists with their least popular politicians, somehow still hanging in the National Assembly).

    on the assumption that people MUST vote against Orban whoever is available

    That has happened in all of the by-elections since 2014. Fidesz lost each of them. I’m not saying it will happen everywhere, but if Fidesz loses over half the districts…

    Let me repeat: I still think Fidesz will win this one. But unless they change significantly (and I’m not sure they are capable of that), they will lose badly in 2022. Probably already during the European elections. Even the municipal elections (I think in 2019). It’s possible that they won’t be able to hold onto power until 2022. (And there’s now some chance of them losing already on April 8.)

    They have less than half of the voters, and anyone who is not explicitly their voter hates them. Not a good situation, even if you’re the biggest party in the land…

  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    There is one little problem with your claim: in China, people are not allowed to choose national leaders, even via fake vote. Another is that Putin enjoys much greater genuine support in Russia than Trump in the US, Merkel in Germany, or Macron in France, not to mention pathetic lame duck May in the UK. I don’t know how widespread is the support of Xi in China, but it can’t be lower that that of Trump, Merkel, or May in their countries. Personally, I am no fan of Putin, but I admire his ability to win kudos for Russia with a fairly weak hand (Xi also tends to win kudos for his country, but his cards are much stronger). This most likely explains Western hysteria.

    Dishonesty, hysteria and russophobia of the West helps to propel Putin’s support among Russians during elections. If it hadn’t been for the West Putin support might have sunk long ago. What do we have as a result? Even if the elections were rigged a bit the second and the third candidate with the most voter support are definitively not pro-Western.
    Here’s piece of news about Russia https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/03/21/us-russian-crew-blasts-of-for-the-iss-from-kazakhstan/ If Russians are so evil why do we collaborate with them? Why do we use their help to send astronauts to space? But most mainstream media doesn’t report news like this. Instead we get constant bashing of Russia in the media, Russian collusion, Russian meddling in the US elections, chemical attack in Syria, Russians intelligence services (or whoever) killing people in London etc.
    How about proper investigation, fact checking, trying to be impartial for a sec in order to find the actual offender? Nah, too hard. Let’s just show some photos of children in Syria and bomb the sh*t out of Assad. Or declare murder in London as Russian attack on UK sovereignty and expel all Russian diplomats.

    • Replies: @RobinG
    Yesterday the US Senate voted to continue the genocide of Yemeni civilians.

    David Swanson gives a good account of how it went down, but IMO his attribution to $$$ is overly simplistic. There's also their brains washed with "evil Iran" propaganda.
    http://davidswanson.org/why-55-u-s-senators-voted-for-genocide-in-yemen/
    Why 55 U.S. Senators Voted for Genocide in Yemen
    , @EugeneGur

    How about proper investigation, fact checking, trying to be impartial for a sec in order to find the actual offender? Nah, too hard.
     
    That is all fine and good provided there ever was an offender and there was in fact a crime committed. Perhaps, this was all staged; nobody was poisoned, or if there was, it happened with the full knowledge and approval of the appropriate UK authorities.

    This seems to be the most logical explanation, and all this talk about "Novichok", chemical weapons and such is just a smokescreen. The explanation that this was a false flag operation is the only one fully consistent with the behavior of the UK government. Even assuming the UK politicians are dumb, they can't possibly be that dumb not to be able to predict the Russian reaction to an ultimatum. They'd only do that if they in fact didn't want any information or cooperation but wanted to start a quarrel right away. A total absence of all Western ambassadors at the briefing by the Russian Foreign Ministry the other day confirms the theory.

    The UK did everything possible to obfuscate the matter, so chances are we'll never know what, if anything, really happened. Any information and/or samples coming now from the UK authorities is obviously suspect, since there is no way to know where in fact they are coming from. This is the same pattern used many a time before in Syria, in Litvinenko case, in the MH17 "investigation", etc.
  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    For the sake of the majority of readers who don’t speak Russian Mr. Shamir should have translated the poster shown in the picture. It says on one side “March 18, 2018”, and on the other “Strong president – strong Russia!” Without Western meddling in Syria and Ukraine this slogan would have been useless. The effect of Western propaganda is clearly reflected in the fact that more than 84% of voters residing outside Russia chose Putin, much more than those residing in the country (less than 77%). Mr. Shamir also should have mentioned that March 18 was not just a random date: it was the fourth anniversary of Crimea rejoining Russia. As could be expected, in Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, the fraction of Putin vote was even greater than in the rest of Russia, more than 90%. The people there remember who they should thank for their escape from the Ukrainian madhouse. All these little tricks certainly helped Putin, but this help was predicated on an insane anti-Putin propaganda campaign in the West. I am saying insane for a reason. Russian people have learned their lesson: there will never be another Yeltsin or Gorbachev in Russia. In fact, the West will rue the day Putin is gone.

    Agree. It looks like Gorbo-Yeltsyn betrayal was a culmination of Russia misplaced desire to join to be like the West. I also wondered about difference in national psych. When the West liked something it just wanted to take It, not to be like it and Russia instead of wanting to take over what she liked wanted to be like it. It led to self betrayal and catastrophe. Russia did have 2 chances to take over Europe in 1813-1814 and in 1945.

  • I have suspected for a long time that Israel Shamir is an Israeli intelligence asset. This piece shows him very skilfully and maybe without uttering an outright falsehood but with selective truths undermining the legitimacy of Putin.

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • @reiner Tor
    Also recently websites have popped up showing the most viable (popular) opposition candidates in most districts, so now voters already have the information. Orbán probably didn’t understand the possibilities of the internet.

    that’s on the assumption that people MUST vote against Orban whoever is available. As far as I can tell, that’s not automatically the case. Voter apathy might prevail as well, in which case Orban profits, or Jobbik, which is unhandshakeworthy more from the left than from the right anyways and just effectively block any coalition.

    Did the lefties in Hungary adapt anti-immigrationism yet? In Slovakia, the whole country is basically united in this case so it is not really a voter issue.

    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    Jobbik has drifted to the left. It's now probably to the left of Fidesz, or at least not significantly to the right. Its relations with any of the leftist parties are better than Fidesz. By the way, Orbán tried to make it impossible for them to campaign. So they also hate Orbán now. And they are definitely not less handshakeworthy than Fidesz. They already engaged in talks to the leftist parties. The "new leftist" parties (untainted with governing 2002-10) actually probably like Jobbik more than the socialists or DK (a spinoff party of the socialists with their least popular politicians, somehow still hanging in the National Assembly).

    on the assumption that people MUST vote against Orban whoever is available
     
    That has happened in all of the by-elections since 2014. Fidesz lost each of them. I'm not saying it will happen everywhere, but if Fidesz loses over half the districts...

    Let me repeat: I still think Fidesz will win this one. But unless they change significantly (and I'm not sure they are capable of that), they will lose badly in 2022. Probably already during the European elections. Even the municipal elections (I think in 2019). It's possible that they won't be able to hold onto power until 2022. (And there's now some chance of them losing already on April 8.)

    They have less than half of the voters, and anyone who is not explicitly their voter hates them. Not a good situation, even if you're the biggest party in the land...
  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @Sin City Milla
    I spend hours each day in a lunch spot that blares CNN. I always turn my back to the screen n put on headphones since I don't have time to re-verify simple facts like the sky is blue, facts which PravdCNN constantly seeks to bring into doubt.

    From my backward seat I get to observe the lunchgoers as they consume CNN-fare along with their lunch-fare, without myself having the misfortune of having to hear CNN or see the screen.

    What I see is extraordinary. People of all sorts sit n eat n stare with goggle eyes clearly sinking into an hypnotic state. Some stare with their mouths open. Some even forget to eat. Many become agitated n after leaving rush back to view the screen a second time. The shop employees are obsessed with it n often run to the screen to turn up the volume as if some great world crisis were erupting. Others swear n curse. This goes on for hours. Professional types, middle class people, even bums pause from their prohibited panhandling all stop n stare n absorb n clearly believe whatever the heck the screen is saying. None ever read books, they just sit n stare n react.

    On those rare occasions when I waste a moment by turning to look at the screen to verify that WW3 has truly broken out, all I ever see is Wolf Blitzer holding sheets of paper n the word Trump inching across the screen. I always regret wasting the moment turning to look when I could have read a few more words in my book.

    Indoctrination via habituation n hypnosis seems to be the chief message of CNN. When I check genuine news sources later on I always find that WW3 did not break out, that Trump is still the President, that the sky is actually blue n not green or red or polka dot n has not magically transformed itself into cloud images of the Martyr Hillary in Gaea sympathy with PC Cultists' lamentations.

    What I see is extraordinary. People of all sorts sit n eat n stare with goggle eyes clearly sinking into an hypnotic state. Some stare with their mouths open. Some even forget to eat. Many become agitated n after leaving rush back to view the screen a second time. The shop employees are obsessed with it n often run to the screen to turn up the volume as if some great world crisis were erupting. Others swear n curse. This goes on for hours. Professional types, middle class people, even bums pause from their prohibited panhandling all stop n stare n absorb n clearly believe whatever the heck the screen is saying. None ever read books, they just sit n stare n react.

    Yup.
    People who at least try to think are squeezed between those you described and sociopaths/psychopats in power.

    I, personally, actually don’t still know who to blame for that predicament and, more importantly, is there is a point anyway.

    Most like, it is just what it is, like sky is blue etc.

    I truly believe that all that would work just fine save that Oppenheimer’s invention ’45.
    That…thing….created the problem.
    The “mind” you described above having thermonuclear weapons. Just…..not…….good.

  • @Anonymous
    Putin and Trump are controversial puppets that serve respective national interests. Trump puppet is a return to the swagger of the ugly American. Putin is composed and ruthless because people end up dead after a button is pushed or something every American remembers from grade school propaganda. Both puppets have fan bases around the world and in each of their countries. Each country tries to show its own citizens and the rest of the world how honest and true their fake money drenched voting frauds are. The most Democratic and free countries where the sheep have a vote are incidentally the world's leading weapons manufacturers: US, Russia and China.

    In my opinion, if any political leader is not a puppet, it is Putin.

  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    You may be right, all 27 years in the US I communicated with the smartest people in the country, at Universities, research institutes, and scientific meetings. I only encounter hoi polloi when I drive through the middle of nowhere, like Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Tennessee, or Indiana, and only briefly at gas stations or in roadside eateries. It is usually pretty bad, “a bunch of imbeciles”, using your expression. I have a feeling that a representative sample of common people I encountered in school in what now is Lugansk Republic was smarter. But I might be wrong, that was so long ago.

    What surprised me most in the USA was, when staying at the homes of USA friends with good, even university education, was their ignorance.
    A former university history professor talked to me about the USA Civil War, he was flabbergasted when I showed little interest, stating that in Europe we had had wars all the time.
    A more or less well known USA writer, of non fiction, I saw reading the Readers Digest.
    A high school teacher just watched CNN.
    On the other hand, in e mail discussions with USA veterans, Korea and Vietnam, they knew quite well how they had been fooled, even, Vietnam, how the USA had committed war crimes.
    But who in the USA understands that FDR wanted war since he was brought into politics, 1932, ad deliberately provoked Pearl Harbour ?
    Yet the books explaining this, written by USA historians, or for example in the diaries of Lindbergh, exist.
    Who read the diaries of Harold L Ickes, where one can find that Britain had to pay the price of the Balfour Declaration, in order to be saved from capitulation in November 1917 ?
    But let me admit, before retirement gave me the opportunity to read widely, I also did not doubt what quality media told us.
    I now see our media as the Germans see theirs, Lügenpresse, literally ‘lies press’.
    In reaction the EU has begun censoring internet, fake news.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Well, it is Lügenpresse everywhere. It cannot be anything else when the same elites wholly own MSM and all branches of government. Founding Fathers must be turning in their graves.
  • @Twodees Partain
    Jilles, maybe your American friends are simply ignorant and easily fooled. That is the type of people who make CNN their sole source of news. This doesn't make them average Americans, just CNN fans.

    If I came to visit a friend in Holland, and based my opinion of all Nederlanders on that friend and three others like him that I met while there, would you agree with me if I said that the average person in the Netherlands thought like my friend and his three friends?

    No.
    We yesterday had our municipal elections, and our last referendum, the law that makes referenda possible has been abolished.
    For ‘good’ reason, any time we can vote in a referendum we vote against government policy, without any effect.
    2005 we voted against the EU, two years ago against the EU Ukraine association treaty, this, the last time, against the law that makes it possible for our secret services to spy legally on anyone.
    The result of ignoring us was clear yesterday, the big losers were the national governing parties, the winners local parties.
    Like Germany and Belgium, it becomes more and more difficult to govern our country.
    In all three countries it took more than half a year to form a stable government, in our case, as with the two previous Rutte governments, with a parliamentary majority of one seat.
    Next year we have our provincial elections, in fact elections for the higher, and smaller second parliament.
    I expect that will be the end of Rutte, what then will emerge; no idea.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Well, thanks for that first word, which was at least a reply to my question.
  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Maybe I overestimate American citizens (I work at a top-rate University and communicate mostly with faculty and grad students), but I’d like to come to their defense. CNN (as well as FOX news, NYT, and other MSM) represent the views of the lower half of US citizens by IQ. As far as I can tell, blatant lies of Western propaganda achieved among the people with brains the same result as the Soviet propaganda: even if they state something truthful for a change, people would doubt that.

    I spend hours each day in a lunch spot that blares CNN. I always turn my back to the screen n put on headphones since I don’t have time to re-verify simple facts like the sky is blue, facts which PravdCNN constantly seeks to bring into doubt.

    From my backward seat I get to observe the lunchgoers as they consume CNN-fare along with their lunch-fare, without myself having the misfortune of having to hear CNN or see the screen.

    What I see is extraordinary. People of all sorts sit n eat n stare with goggle eyes clearly sinking into an hypnotic state. Some stare with their mouths open. Some even forget to eat. Many become agitated n after leaving rush back to view the screen a second time. The shop employees are obsessed with it n often run to the screen to turn up the volume as if some great world crisis were erupting. Others swear n curse. This goes on for hours. Professional types, middle class people, even bums pause from their prohibited panhandling all stop n stare n absorb n clearly believe whatever the heck the screen is saying. None ever read books, they just sit n stare n react.

    On those rare occasions when I waste a moment by turning to look at the screen to verify that WW3 has truly broken out, all I ever see is Wolf Blitzer holding sheets of paper n the word Trump inching across the screen. I always regret wasting the moment turning to look when I could have read a few more words in my book.

    Indoctrination via habituation n hypnosis seems to be the chief message of CNN. When I check genuine news sources later on I always find that WW3 did not break out, that Trump is still the President, that the sky is actually blue n not green or red or polka dot n has not magically transformed itself into cloud images of the Martyr Hillary in Gaea sympathy with PC Cultists’ lamentations.

    • Replies: @peterAUS

    What I see is extraordinary. People of all sorts sit n eat n stare with goggle eyes clearly sinking into an hypnotic state. Some stare with their mouths open. Some even forget to eat. Many become agitated n after leaving rush back to view the screen a second time. The shop employees are obsessed with it n often run to the screen to turn up the volume as if some great world crisis were erupting. Others swear n curse. This goes on for hours. Professional types, middle class people, even bums pause from their prohibited panhandling all stop n stare n absorb n clearly believe whatever the heck the screen is saying. None ever read books, they just sit n stare n react.
     
    Yup.
    People who at least try to think are squeezed between those you described and sociopaths/psychopats in power.

    I, personally, actually don't still know who to blame for that predicament and, more importantly, is there is a point anyway.

    Most like, it is just what it is, like sky is blue etc.

    I truly believe that all that would work just fine save that Oppenheimer's invention '45.
    That...thing....created the problem.
    The "mind" you described above having thermonuclear weapons. Just.....not.......good.
    , @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Good description how the propaganda works. The ways and mechanisms are exactly the same in the USA, UK, Germany, etc., as they were in the USSR.
  • @The Alarmist
    77% is hardly Stalin- or Enver Hoxha territory, but yes, I guess they over-egged the pudding.

    I am sure that Putin would win election in every country in the world for even much less , what he did in Russia…He is the only one. No competition . I repeat , no competition for Putin.
    And they not only voted for him but they got already plenty of improvement back.
    More that they dreamed.. First normal ruler and excellent one.
    Russia is now a showcase of democracy.
    If Xenia have a nice looking mother , everything is possible …
    /Even good treatment, in the cruel election fights/.
    Swamp is now dried in Moscow…

  • I find it rather interesting that none of the comments address the last part of Shamir’s article. If it’s correct, the Brits made a very nasty error that shows the true nature of their establishment.

  • @Michael Kenny
    The idea that Putin staged the British attack so as to generate a nationalist backlash in the election had crossed my mind. It probably had some effect and that led to the overkill the author is referring to. The fact that Both Putin's and Grudinin's results were significantly out of line with the polls suggests rigging on behalf of both of them, all the more so as the results obtained by the other candidates were essentially what the polls predicted. More importantly, though, Putin has (once again!) shot himself in the foot. Nobody really beleives the official results, including the voter turnout, but even if you take the official numbers, the election has been pretty much a disaster for him. Only about half the electorate voted for him, with about one third refusing to vote at all, in spite of inducements and pressures, with about 17% voting for the various other candidates. From now on, therefore, claims by Putin's American supporters that he enjoys massive popular support will be laughed out of court. Roughly one Russian in two wants to see the last of him! Some of that is due to his hanging on too long. He has now been in effective power for 19 years and people are just bored with him. That happened to Thatcher after 11 years. Merkel is more or less finished after 13 years and even his most loyal supporters were glad to see François Mitterrand go after 14 years. Desire for change is part of human nature. For that very reason, I don't see Putin staying until 2024.

    When you state that an idea crossed your mind, how on earth do you measure a time span of such a super short duration? Is it a nano second or one and a half?

    • LOL: bluedog
  • @Alexander Peters
    As usual, UNZ offers a different and interesting point of view.
    But Mr. Shamir's analysis lacks crucial information.

    First, I am missing a clear rejection of dictator and war criminal Putin's politics.
    (We reject the American regime. Why not treat the Russian regime equally?)

    Second, we are not sure whether the same elite might be in control of both, the American and the Russian regime, since they seem to stabalize themselves and both exploit their population.

    Third, Mr. Shamir touches to lightly the possibility of the other parties being controlled opposition (by the Kremlin). In this case the election would be a complete scam. We need to be aware of how professionally the Russian gangster state is fooling their people. Mr. Putin's image is a complete media invention. He is an only 1,70 Meter small guy who used to be an unimportant KGB spy. Yet the Russian people see him riding horses and supposedly making smart business decisions. He probably isn't even making the decisions. In this regard, Trump is less ridiculous because at least everyone knows how ridiculous he is.

    Fourth, how the hell can the Communist party still be a thing?

    Which brings me to, Five, we need to start holding the Russian people accountable for their gouvernment. If they glorify Stalin and still keep Lenin's body in a mausoleum for visiting, if they accept their criminal leadership, if they spend more money on scam wonder healers than doctors, and if they keep spending money on weapons of mass destruction, then they deserve what's comming at them.

    This does not mean war, but even more economical sanctions. At the moment the world is driving towards a new Cold War. And it's not only the US that's to blame for it.

    Very funny.

  • @Raves
    Of course, like most articles about Putin, no evidence is provided.

    I'm sick of fake news. I'm sick of the constant barrage of claims with no evidence. I don't care who makes them. If you want people to pay any attention, provide evidence. Otherwise, I might as well waste my time watching CNN.

    What’s stopping you?

  • @jilles dykstra
    Alas, I stayed with USA friends, well educated middle class, where CNN was the only 'news' source.
    Three other USA acquaintances I visited in their homes, cannot remember having seen a newspaper other than a local one about marriages and funerals.
    The USA reminded me of the Peking court, that, when British warships were reported on the coast, responded with 'there had been so many pirates already'.
    In the Badlands, in a very small café, I identified myself as Dutch, from Holland, Netherlands.
    When all this did not ring bell I mentioned Europe, the first time in my life.
    This was understood.

    Jilles, maybe your American friends are simply ignorant and easily fooled. That is the type of people who make CNN their sole source of news. This doesn’t make them average Americans, just CNN fans.

    If I came to visit a friend in Holland, and based my opinion of all Nederlanders on that friend and three others like him that I met while there, would you agree with me if I said that the average person in the Netherlands thought like my friend and his three friends?

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    No.
    We yesterday had our municipal elections, and our last referendum, the law that makes referenda possible has been abolished.
    For 'good' reason, any time we can vote in a referendum we vote against government policy, without any effect.
    2005 we voted against the EU, two years ago against the EU Ukraine association treaty, this, the last time, against the law that makes it possible for our secret services to spy legally on anyone.
    The result of ignoring us was clear yesterday, the big losers were the national governing parties, the winners local parties.
    Like Germany and Belgium, it becomes more and more difficult to govern our country.
    In all three countries it took more than half a year to form a stable government, in our case, as with the two previous Rutte governments, with a parliamentary majority of one seat.
    Next year we have our provincial elections, in fact elections for the higher, and smaller second parliament.
    I expect that will be the end of Rutte, what then will emerge; no idea.
  • @RobinG
    You're truly delusional if you think CNN does NOT represent average American thinking, at least a large paart of it. Last week I suffered through a luncheon of 5 mature adults extolling Rachel Maddow. Sickening.

    No, Robin, I’m not delusional. CNN is the news source of choice for libtards, and I do not consider libtards “average Americans”.

    Please seek help with your anger issues. Everyone who disagrees with your views isn’t delusional, and you don’t know everything about everything. You can go take your pill now.

  • @Michael Kenny
    The idea that Putin staged the British attack so as to generate a nationalist backlash in the election had crossed my mind. It probably had some effect and that led to the overkill the author is referring to. The fact that Both Putin's and Grudinin's results were significantly out of line with the polls suggests rigging on behalf of both of them, all the more so as the results obtained by the other candidates were essentially what the polls predicted. More importantly, though, Putin has (once again!) shot himself in the foot. Nobody really beleives the official results, including the voter turnout, but even if you take the official numbers, the election has been pretty much a disaster for him. Only about half the electorate voted for him, with about one third refusing to vote at all, in spite of inducements and pressures, with about 17% voting for the various other candidates. From now on, therefore, claims by Putin's American supporters that he enjoys massive popular support will be laughed out of court. Roughly one Russian in two wants to see the last of him! Some of that is due to his hanging on too long. He has now been in effective power for 19 years and people are just bored with him. That happened to Thatcher after 11 years. Merkel is more or less finished after 13 years and even his most loyal supporters were glad to see François Mitterrand go after 14 years. Desire for change is part of human nature. For that very reason, I don't see Putin staying until 2024.

    80 US Senators have been in office for at least 20 years. Hillary Clinton routinely boasted of 40+ years in politics. Perhaps the desire for change is smothered in the USA too.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  • AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:
    @RobinG
    Again, with the IQ - university trope? It's largely irrelevant.

    Anon from TN
    IQ in my comments is just a shorthand for intellectual ability. It does not mean that I believe in it. I was on the admissions committee of our umbrella graduate program long enough to know that IQ, GRE, or SAT scores mean exactly nothing. At best, they reflect the effort people put into preparation to these tests, but have no predictive value whatsoever.

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • @John Gruskos
    I hope you're wrong.

    From a distance, Viktor Orban looks like the world's greatest statesman.

    On the big, long term issues his platform is perfect:

    Immigration restriction
    Non-interventionist foreign policy
    Christian social conservatism
    Understands the importance of a replacement level birthrate
    Pragmatic populist economics
    National pride and sovereignty
    Relatively friendly towards Russia, could conceivable be the mediator who prevents WW3
    Foreign aid focused on helping the most vulnerable people, Middle Eastern Christians, survive in their own homeland
    Above all, the public face and brains of the V4 group, and the established ally of the national conservatives currently taking control of Austria, Italy and hopefully soon other Western European countries.

    For the first time since John Hunyadi, the #1 defender of European Christian civilization is a Hungarian.

    The poll results on Wikipedia look promising for Fidesz:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_Hungarian_parliamentary_election,_2018

    The 30 day average gives Fidesz 50% + support, compared to 45% in 2014.

    It looks as though Fidesz has stolen a large chunk of Jobbik's 2014 supporters, and the combined nationalist percentage (Fidesz + Jobbik) has slightly increased at the expense of the left.

    Even better from a long term perspective, polling by age group from 2016 shows progressively larger margins of support for Fidesz (and for Jobbik) among younger groups.

    Even better from a long term perspective, polling by age group from 2016 shows progressively larger margins of support for Fidesz (and for Jobbik) among younger groups.

    I don’t think it’s true of Fidesz, they are weaker among the young. I think it might be true of Jobbik to an extent, but also of the new leftist parties, especially the otherwise very small Momentum, probably also LMP.

  • @John Gruskos
    I hope you're wrong.

    From a distance, Viktor Orban looks like the world's greatest statesman.

    On the big, long term issues his platform is perfect:

    Immigration restriction
    Non-interventionist foreign policy
    Christian social conservatism
    Understands the importance of a replacement level birthrate
    Pragmatic populist economics
    National pride and sovereignty
    Relatively friendly towards Russia, could conceivable be the mediator who prevents WW3
    Foreign aid focused on helping the most vulnerable people, Middle Eastern Christians, survive in their own homeland
    Above all, the public face and brains of the V4 group, and the established ally of the national conservatives currently taking control of Austria, Italy and hopefully soon other Western European countries.

    For the first time since John Hunyadi, the #1 defender of European Christian civilization is a Hungarian.

    The poll results on Wikipedia look promising for Fidesz:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_Hungarian_parliamentary_election,_2018

    The 30 day average gives Fidesz 50% + support, compared to 45% in 2014.

    It looks as though Fidesz has stolen a large chunk of Jobbik's 2014 supporters, and the combined nationalist percentage (Fidesz + Jobbik) has slightly increased at the expense of the left.

    Even better from a long term perspective, polling by age group from 2016 shows progressively larger margins of support for Fidesz (and for Jobbik) among younger groups.

    Methodological note: The Hungarian pollsters generally release separate data about the support of political parties among all eligible voters (which tends to include a high percentage for “don’t know/no preference”), and about the support of political parties among “active” or “certain” voters. The table below refers to the latter data.[a]

    It’s a near certainty that the “don’t know” voters will mostly vote for an opposition party. There’s more of them than usual, especially this close to the election (when normally voters already know for sure if they were going to vote, and for whom).

    Orbán is good (he seems to have gotten more and more based over the years), but his corruption and his tendency to surround himself with incompetent hacks and sycophants will be his undoing. As I wrote, I still expect him to win this time, but he will no longer get a supermajority.

    Regarding immigration, if Jobbik becomes a part of the coalition, then I wouldn’t expect big changes. Even half of leftist voters are against third world immigration. But I’m not sure if the enthusiasm will stay.

    Also Orbán is overusing the migration topic in his election campaign, especially whenever his corruption comes up. It only discredits the topic, which I don’t like.

    I still hope he’ll manage to change. As you wrote, he is probably the most based white leader of any country.

    We’ll see.

  • @reiner Tor
    You have to remember he started out as a young, fresh leader. (The name Fidesz originally comes from an abbreviation FIDESZ, which stood for Young Democrats' Alliance. It was a liberal party in the early 1990s, and until 1992 no new member could be accepted above the age 35...)

    His entourage changed a lot since he came to power in 2010. It moved a bit in the alt-right direction, which is to say, it got crankier. Many of his more normal conservative allies left him over the years or started keeping a low profile, while he started to employ stupid lieutenants. Since 2010, but especially since 2014 he really became a Führer of his party, and most people around him were sycophants. He seems to have believed by 2014 that he was an infallible genius, and that it was no longer possible for anyone in Hungary to beat him.

    His lieutenants are now either stupid or corrupt or both. He himself is not above all this: his son-in-law started a corrupt scheme in 2010, and was already considered a shady scandal-ridden figure before 2014, but recently new details emerged. It's possible Hungary will have to pay back some money to the EU (I mean, stealing EU monies when you're trying to take a stand against them must be stupid...) because of these shady deals. The mayor of his native village became one of the richest people in the country over the past 8 years (he's a simple gas fitter), and many people now suspect that his wealth actually belongs to Orbán personally. To be honest, it's not implausible.

    I hope you’re wrong.

    From a distance, Viktor Orban looks like the world’s greatest statesman.

    On the big, long term issues his platform is perfect:

    Immigration restriction
    Non-interventionist foreign policy
    Christian social conservatism
    Understands the importance of a replacement level birthrate
    Pragmatic populist economics
    National pride and sovereignty
    Relatively friendly towards Russia, could conceivable be the mediator who prevents WW3
    Foreign aid focused on helping the most vulnerable people, Middle Eastern Christians, survive in their own homeland
    Above all, the public face and brains of the V4 group, and the established ally of the national conservatives currently taking control of Austria, Italy and hopefully soon other Western European countries.

    For the first time since John Hunyadi, the #1 defender of European Christian civilization is a Hungarian.

    The poll results on Wikipedia look promising for Fidesz:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_Hungarian_parliamentary_election,_2018

    The 30 day average gives Fidesz 50% + support, compared to 45% in 2014.

    It looks as though Fidesz has stolen a large chunk of Jobbik’s 2014 supporters, and the combined nationalist percentage (Fidesz + Jobbik) has slightly increased at the expense of the left.

    Even better from a long term perspective, polling by age group from 2016 shows progressively larger margins of support for Fidesz (and for Jobbik) among younger groups.

    • Replies: @reiner Tor

    Methodological note: The Hungarian pollsters generally release separate data about the support of political parties among all eligible voters (which tends to include a high percentage for "don't know/no preference"), and about the support of political parties among "active" or "certain" voters. The table below refers to the latter data.[a]
     
    It’s a near certainty that the “don’t know” voters will mostly vote for an opposition party. There’s more of them than usual, especially this close to the election (when normally voters already know for sure if they were going to vote, and for whom).

    Orbán is good (he seems to have gotten more and more based over the years), but his corruption and his tendency to surround himself with incompetent hacks and sycophants will be his undoing. As I wrote, I still expect him to win this time, but he will no longer get a supermajority.

    Regarding immigration, if Jobbik becomes a part of the coalition, then I wouldn’t expect big changes. Even half of leftist voters are against third world immigration. But I’m not sure if the enthusiasm will stay.

    Also Orbán is overusing the migration topic in his election campaign, especially whenever his corruption comes up. It only discredits the topic, which I don’t like.

    I still hope he’ll manage to change. As you wrote, he is probably the most based white leader of any country.

    We’ll see.
    , @reiner Tor

    Even better from a long term perspective, polling by age group from 2016 shows progressively larger margins of support for Fidesz (and for Jobbik) among younger groups.
     
    I don’t think it’s true of Fidesz, they are weaker among the young. I think it might be true of Jobbik to an extent, but also of the new leftist parties, especially the otherwise very small Momentum, probably also LMP.
  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    You may be right, all 27 years in the US I communicated with the smartest people in the country, at Universities, research institutes, and scientific meetings. I only encounter hoi polloi when I drive through the middle of nowhere, like Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Tennessee, or Indiana, and only briefly at gas stations or in roadside eateries. It is usually pretty bad, “a bunch of imbeciles”, using your expression. I have a feeling that a representative sample of common people I encountered in school in what now is Lugansk Republic was smarter. But I might be wrong, that was so long ago.

    Again, with the IQ – university trope? It’s largely irrelevant.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    IQ in my comments is just a shorthand for intellectual ability. It does not mean that I believe in it. I was on the admissions committee of our umbrella graduate program long enough to know that IQ, GRE, or SAT scores mean exactly nothing. At best, they reflect the effort people put into preparation to these tests, but have no predictive value whatsoever.
  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Maybe I overestimate American citizens (I work at a top-rate University and communicate mostly with faculty and grad students), but I’d like to come to their defense. CNN (as well as FOX news, NYT, and other MSM) represent the views of the lower half of US citizens by IQ. As far as I can tell, blatant lies of Western propaganda achieved among the people with brains the same result as the Soviet propaganda: even if they state something truthful for a change, people would doubt that.

    You are in a tiny bubble, and just because your small, smart sample seems “woke,” don’t imagine IQ is any barometer for resistance to group-think and propaganda.

    Furthermore, don’t assume that humans, high IQ or otherwise, are capable of extrapolation. My lunch group was composed of Christian activists who have [each] spent decades advocating for Palestinians. They are intimately aware of how propaganda has biased Americans for Israel. They have seen the film, Occupation of the American Mind. They know that only by persistent clever marketing, the Zionists sold the fraudulent “noble little Israel” myth.

    And yet, they accept unquestioningly the MSM fake news about ANY OTHER SUBJECT. I find this particularly galling, but I believe it’s a form of denial they use because the cognitive dissonance would be just too much to bear.

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • @Matra
    Orbán probably didn’t understand the possibilities of the internet.

    One of the most common characteristics of conservatives - ie. the moderate right we've depended on to fight the left over the last half century - throughout the West is that they are really slow learners. Alt Righters always talk about conservative cowardice and treachery, which are also common, but the inability of conservative people in general to even notice new situations/threats etc is even more frustrating and demoralising. I guess it's more to do with endemic provincialism rather than outright stupidity but who knows.

    You have to remember he started out as a young, fresh leader. (The name Fidesz originally comes from an abbreviation FIDESZ, which stood for Young Democrats’ Alliance. It was a liberal party in the early 1990s, and until 1992 no new member could be accepted above the age 35…)

    His entourage changed a lot since he came to power in 2010. It moved a bit in the alt-right direction, which is to say, it got crankier. Many of his more normal conservative allies left him over the years or started keeping a low profile, while he started to employ stupid lieutenants. Since 2010, but especially since 2014 he really became a Führer of his party, and most people around him were sycophants. He seems to have believed by 2014 that he was an infallible genius, and that it was no longer possible for anyone in Hungary to beat him.

    His lieutenants are now either stupid or corrupt or both. He himself is not above all this: his son-in-law started a corrupt scheme in 2010, and was already considered a shady scandal-ridden figure before 2014, but recently new details emerged. It’s possible Hungary will have to pay back some money to the EU (I mean, stealing EU monies when you’re trying to take a stand against them must be stupid…) because of these shady deals. The mayor of his native village became one of the richest people in the country over the past 8 years (he’s a simple gas fitter), and many people now suspect that his wealth actually belongs to Orbán personally. To be honest, it’s not implausible.

    • Replies: @John Gruskos
    I hope you're wrong.

    From a distance, Viktor Orban looks like the world's greatest statesman.

    On the big, long term issues his platform is perfect:

    Immigration restriction
    Non-interventionist foreign policy
    Christian social conservatism
    Understands the importance of a replacement level birthrate
    Pragmatic populist economics
    National pride and sovereignty
    Relatively friendly towards Russia, could conceivable be the mediator who prevents WW3
    Foreign aid focused on helping the most vulnerable people, Middle Eastern Christians, survive in their own homeland
    Above all, the public face and brains of the V4 group, and the established ally of the national conservatives currently taking control of Austria, Italy and hopefully soon other Western European countries.

    For the first time since John Hunyadi, the #1 defender of European Christian civilization is a Hungarian.

    The poll results on Wikipedia look promising for Fidesz:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_Hungarian_parliamentary_election,_2018

    The 30 day average gives Fidesz 50% + support, compared to 45% in 2014.

    It looks as though Fidesz has stolen a large chunk of Jobbik's 2014 supporters, and the combined nationalist percentage (Fidesz + Jobbik) has slightly increased at the expense of the left.

    Even better from a long term perspective, polling by age group from 2016 shows progressively larger margins of support for Fidesz (and for Jobbik) among younger groups.

  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @CalDre

    ad hominen detected. Israel really knows as well as I do what is going on here.
     
    So if he is living in Jaffa, Stockholm and Moscow (in which order?), how does he find so much time to spend in Yakut and get the pulse of the place? Russia is a big place to travel around, with many different languages, cultures, etc. And many people have many opinions. Spare us the "I know Russia" crap. All you have is your opinion.

    But let us (Russians) to decide how we’ll build our future.
     
    First of all it is not me that is interfering in anything in Russia. But Israel, what is he, Israeli, Swede, Russian, something else? Anybody know? He seems to try to influence much more. But that's OK with you as he is Communist, yes?

    All the problems arise from attempts of the West to transfer its f#cken “values” around the world.
     
    Even if that were true, "Communism" is most definitely a "Western value". Or didn't they teach you that in your grade school?

    First of all it is not me that is interfering in anything in Russia. But Israel, what is he, Israeli, Swede, Russian, something else? Anybody know? He seems to try to influence much more. But that’s OK with you as he is Communist, yes?

    He is journalist/columnist that writes around monthly for Komsomolskaya Pravda in Russia. I was surprised he answers questions here. As for his name – he is actually anti-Israel, ironically.

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • Orbán probably didn’t understand the possibilities of the internet.

    One of the most common characteristics of conservatives – ie. the moderate right we’ve depended on to fight the left over the last half century – throughout the West is that they are really slow learners. Alt Righters always talk about conservative cowardice and treachery, which are also common, but the inability of conservative people in general to even notice new situations/threats etc is even more frustrating and demoralising. I guess it’s more to do with endemic provincialism rather than outright stupidity but who knows.

    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    You have to remember he started out as a young, fresh leader. (The name Fidesz originally comes from an abbreviation FIDESZ, which stood for Young Democrats' Alliance. It was a liberal party in the early 1990s, and until 1992 no new member could be accepted above the age 35...)

    His entourage changed a lot since he came to power in 2010. It moved a bit in the alt-right direction, which is to say, it got crankier. Many of his more normal conservative allies left him over the years or started keeping a low profile, while he started to employ stupid lieutenants. Since 2010, but especially since 2014 he really became a Führer of his party, and most people around him were sycophants. He seems to have believed by 2014 that he was an infallible genius, and that it was no longer possible for anyone in Hungary to beat him.

    His lieutenants are now either stupid or corrupt or both. He himself is not above all this: his son-in-law started a corrupt scheme in 2010, and was already considered a shady scandal-ridden figure before 2014, but recently new details emerged. It's possible Hungary will have to pay back some money to the EU (I mean, stealing EU monies when you're trying to take a stand against them must be stupid...) because of these shady deals. The mayor of his native village became one of the richest people in the country over the past 8 years (he's a simple gas fitter), and many people now suspect that his wealth actually belongs to Orbán personally. To be honest, it's not implausible.
  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Is it possible you just communicate with the top 5% USA people with regard to IQ ?
    Or even a lower % ?
    One of the shocking events of my life was when I was summoned for being tested for compulsory military service, it was in 1961, if I remember correctly.
    The group that was there was, I suppose a representative sample of the Dutch.
    My idea 'a bunch of imbeciles'.
    Just having had contact with gymnasium and university people, my idea of the average Dutch clearly was all wrong.
    I must have forgotten by then primary school, where it was about the same.
    I met people with the same shock.

    Anon from TN
    You may be right, all 27 years in the US I communicated with the smartest people in the country, at Universities, research institutes, and scientific meetings. I only encounter hoi polloi when I drive through the middle of nowhere, like Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Tennessee, or Indiana, and only briefly at gas stations or in roadside eateries. It is usually pretty bad, “a bunch of imbeciles”, using your expression. I have a feeling that a representative sample of common people I encountered in school in what now is Lugansk Republic was smarter. But I might be wrong, that was so long ago.

    • Replies: @RobinG
    Again, with the IQ - university trope? It's largely irrelevant.
    , @jilles dykstra
    What surprised me most in the USA was, when staying at the homes of USA friends with good, even university education, was their ignorance.
    A former university history professor talked to me about the USA Civil War, he was flabbergasted when I showed little interest, stating that in Europe we had had wars all the time.
    A more or less well known USA writer, of non fiction, I saw reading the Readers Digest.
    A high school teacher just watched CNN.
    On the other hand, in e mail discussions with USA veterans, Korea and Vietnam, they knew quite well how they had been fooled, even, Vietnam, how the USA had committed war crimes.
    But who in the USA understands that FDR wanted war since he was brought into politics, 1932, ad deliberately provoked Pearl Harbour ?
    Yet the books explaining this, written by USA historians, or for example in the diaries of Lindbergh, exist.
    Who read the diaries of Harold L Ickes, where one can find that Britain had to pay the price of the Balfour Declaration, in order to be saved from capitulation in November 1917 ?
    But let me admit, before retirement gave me the opportunity to read widely, I also did not doubt what quality media told us.
    I now see our media as the Germans see theirs, Lügenpresse, literally 'lies press'.
    In reaction the EU has begun censoring internet, fake news.
  • Well one thing is certainly clear, the poison didn’t act like a fourth generation military grade chemical weapon should act, especially if super-evil Putin-assassin-bots actually planned this shit. I mean a failure rate of 1 out of 2, hit me, maybe they like to sail close to the wind with dosage, but both?!

  • @prusmc
    Big error! Demonizing works very well. Just look at how Trump is portrayed by the media, academia, entertainment and a large part of the GOP.

    Trump does make it easy for them.

  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Maybe I overestimate American citizens (I work at a top-rate University and communicate mostly with faculty and grad students), but I’d like to come to their defense. CNN (as well as FOX news, NYT, and other MSM) represent the views of the lower half of US citizens by IQ. As far as I can tell, blatant lies of Western propaganda achieved among the people with brains the same result as the Soviet propaganda: even if they state something truthful for a change, people would doubt that.

    Is it possible you just communicate with the top 5% USA people with regard to IQ ?
    Or even a lower % ?
    One of the shocking events of my life was when I was summoned for being tested for compulsory military service, it was in 1961, if I remember correctly.
    The group that was there was, I suppose a representative sample of the Dutch.
    My idea ‘a bunch of imbeciles’.
    Just having had contact with gymnasium and university people, my idea of the average Dutch clearly was all wrong.
    I must have forgotten by then primary school, where it was about the same.
    I met people with the same shock.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    You may be right, all 27 years in the US I communicated with the smartest people in the country, at Universities, research institutes, and scientific meetings. I only encounter hoi polloi when I drive through the middle of nowhere, like Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Tennessee, or Indiana, and only briefly at gas stations or in roadside eateries. It is usually pretty bad, “a bunch of imbeciles”, using your expression. I have a feeling that a representative sample of common people I encountered in school in what now is Lugansk Republic was smarter. But I might be wrong, that was so long ago.
  • @Alexander Peters
    As usual, UNZ offers a different and interesting point of view.
    But Mr. Shamir's analysis lacks crucial information.

    First, I am missing a clear rejection of dictator and war criminal Putin's politics.
    (We reject the American regime. Why not treat the Russian regime equally?)

    Second, we are not sure whether the same elite might be in control of both, the American and the Russian regime, since they seem to stabalize themselves and both exploit their population.

    Third, Mr. Shamir touches to lightly the possibility of the other parties being controlled opposition (by the Kremlin). In this case the election would be a complete scam. We need to be aware of how professionally the Russian gangster state is fooling their people. Mr. Putin's image is a complete media invention. He is an only 1,70 Meter small guy who used to be an unimportant KGB spy. Yet the Russian people see him riding horses and supposedly making smart business decisions. He probably isn't even making the decisions. In this regard, Trump is less ridiculous because at least everyone knows how ridiculous he is.

    Fourth, how the hell can the Communist party still be a thing?

    Which brings me to, Five, we need to start holding the Russian people accountable for their gouvernment. If they glorify Stalin and still keep Lenin's body in a mausoleum for visiting, if they accept their criminal leadership, if they spend more money on scam wonder healers than doctors, and if they keep spending money on weapons of mass destruction, then they deserve what's comming at them.

    This does not mean war, but even more economical sanctions. At the moment the world is driving towards a new Cold War. And it's not only the US that's to blame for it.

    “We reject the American regime. Why not treat the Russian regime equally?”
    — And why “we” should treat them equally? The American “regime” has been thoroughly zionized so that an expression of patriotism by the US brass is looked upon as a great courage: http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2018/03/votel-mattis-and-dunford-must-be-on-the-same-page.html
    Comment section: “…all these statements by Votel are true and it took a good deal of courage to make them in public.” — Get it? Just stating truthfully that Syria has won a civil war is an anathema to the Lobby and it takes a great personal courage by a four-star general in the United States Army who has been commander of United States Central Command to testify the truth for the US Congress.
    Russain Federation is an independent state. The US is ZUSA – Ziocon United States of America. Ukraine has become the Kaganat of Nuland, and the UK has become a personal estate of the Friends of Israel. For example, Boris Johnson proclaimed himself a committed Zionist: http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/boris-johnson-zionist/
    Boris Johnson, Theresa May, and Gavin Williamson are not working for the UK citizens — they are working for the Lobby (The Friends of Israel), which explains their indecency re Skripal affair. They are defaming the United Kingdom with their behavior: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/03/21/uk-ambassador-craig-murray-asks-aware-fact/

    • Agree: ValmMond
  • @Johann
    I find Americans to be total hypocrites. I grew up in Philadelphia where there has not been an unfixed election in over sixty years. I am sure many people from Boston, New York, Baltimore, Detroit, Cleveland, Chicago et alii would agree with me. The American election system has been rigged for years; on the national level you get a Democrat/Socialist ticket or a Republican/Socialist ticket as a choice. We also have a media which is an integral part of the corporate deep state. For Americans to whine about fixed elections is a supreme irony. The EU is no better where you get a choice of Center Left versus Center Right which means you have no real choice. The Russian system is probably ten times more honest than anything that comes out of the so called Free World.

    What do you mean when you say the elections have been fixed for years, the truth is they have been fixed for generations going clear back to Washington, but its way more fun to point fingers at some other person or some other country and cry corruption ,after all its the American way….

  • @bjondo
    Don't know Shamir's background. I am familiar with wikipedia - Judaized/Zionized deception and lies especially against someone who has written like Israel Shamir. FLOWERS OF GALILEE highly recommended. Wikipedia NOT.

    He’s jew born in Russia.
    His parents went to Israel, what then was his age I do not know.

  • @Johann
    I find Americans to be total hypocrites. I grew up in Philadelphia where there has not been an unfixed election in over sixty years. I am sure many people from Boston, New York, Baltimore, Detroit, Cleveland, Chicago et alii would agree with me. The American election system has been rigged for years; on the national level you get a Democrat/Socialist ticket or a Republican/Socialist ticket as a choice. We also have a media which is an integral part of the corporate deep state. For Americans to whine about fixed elections is a supreme irony. The EU is no better where you get a choice of Center Left versus Center Right which means you have no real choice. The Russian system is probably ten times more honest than anything that comes out of the so called Free World.

    The whining is coming for the land of Bush the lesser, Cheney five deferments, Rice mushroom cloud, Chicago-style elections, and the Lobby strict censorship over the US Congress (only Israel-firsters are allowed). Wouldn’t it be great if the US first punish her own criminals, including banksters and dual-citizenship spies? Four million civilians — including a multitude of children — were slaughtered in the Middle East since 1999 to satisfy the desires of Israel-firsters, MIC, and oilmen. And yet, the major war criminals who pushed for the wars of aggression (a supreme crime) are wondering free: from Bush and Kristol to Clinton and Powers

  • @EliteCommInc.
    Or it could be that a nation such as Russia has yet to untangle some several hundred years of central authority style leadership and taking on democratic principle is just not as breezy as assumed.


    As such Russia still gravitates towards "a strong man" style of leadership. And Pres Putin is a reasonable, seasoned, astute strong leader, who doesn't fold in the face of adversity.

    Russia has yet to untangle some several hundred years of central authority style leadership and taking on democratic principle is just not as breezy as assumed.

    This is such a cliche phrase. Could you specify where exactly do you see stellar examples of “democratic principles” ? In the UK with its unelected upper chamber of the parliament and the Prime Minister, also not elected directly by the citizens? In the US, with its two-party system in indirect elections? In Australis, with its compulsory voting?

    Today’s Russia is as democratic as any Western country, more so than some. Whatever peculiarities our political system has is due to our history, the same as in any other country. The same as in the UK, with their “constitutional” monarchy in the absence of actual constitution. The same as in the US, with their voting system designed by Founding Fathers. Russia is large and divers; some centralized authority is needed to keep it together structurally and mentally, that is all.

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • @reiner Tor
    A number of scandals rocked his party (some corruption scandals involving his close family members, but not all scandals were corruption related), but the most important thing is that already in 2014 he didn’t have a majority of the votes.

    The Hungarian election system since 2014 is a mix of first past the post and (to a smaller extent) proportional representation. (Even the latter favors the winner.) Before Orbán changed it, it had a similar system, but one where the MP districts had a second round, unless someone received the majority of the votes. So parties could run separately and then after the first round of voting they could form an alliance.

    Orbán changed the system because he understood that for the opposition (which was divided, even without Jobbik) would need to form an alliance in order to be competitive. However, some of the leftist parties were discredited in the eyes of the majority of the electorate (and the voters of Jobbik and the leftists were often incompatible), and so an alliance would have destroyed a large portion of the appeal of the other leftist parties (not to mention Jobbik).

    However, that seems to have changed recently. Moreover, there has been open talk of “cross-voting” even with Jobbik, so in many places the parties won’t even have to form an alliance (which, less than three weeks before the election, they have still failed to do anyway), their voters in each district will be voting for the most popular opposition candidate (and now this seems to include Jobbik), and they are encouraging their voters to do so.

    It’s a question how many of the voters will actually do so, but I think the floodgates have opened to some extent already. It’s not exactly encouraging that since 2014 Fidesz has lost all by-elections. They were usually explained away as products of unusual local circumstances, but it’s getting increasingly likely that it will happen in a lot of places.

    I still expect Fidesz to win, but not by a large margin.

    So parties could run separately and then after the first round of voting they could form an alliance.

    The second round had the three best performing candidates, and it wasn’t necessary to get the majority in the second round. Therefore, cooperation between at least the two largest opposition parties (with some candidates, usually, but not always, the weakest ones, withdrawing from the race) was still needed. But they didn’t have to do it until after the first round.

  • @reiner Tor
    A number of scandals rocked his party (some corruption scandals involving his close family members, but not all scandals were corruption related), but the most important thing is that already in 2014 he didn’t have a majority of the votes.

    The Hungarian election system since 2014 is a mix of first past the post and (to a smaller extent) proportional representation. (Even the latter favors the winner.) Before Orbán changed it, it had a similar system, but one where the MP districts had a second round, unless someone received the majority of the votes. So parties could run separately and then after the first round of voting they could form an alliance.

    Orbán changed the system because he understood that for the opposition (which was divided, even without Jobbik) would need to form an alliance in order to be competitive. However, some of the leftist parties were discredited in the eyes of the majority of the electorate (and the voters of Jobbik and the leftists were often incompatible), and so an alliance would have destroyed a large portion of the appeal of the other leftist parties (not to mention Jobbik).

    However, that seems to have changed recently. Moreover, there has been open talk of “cross-voting” even with Jobbik, so in many places the parties won’t even have to form an alliance (which, less than three weeks before the election, they have still failed to do anyway), their voters in each district will be voting for the most popular opposition candidate (and now this seems to include Jobbik), and they are encouraging their voters to do so.

    It’s a question how many of the voters will actually do so, but I think the floodgates have opened to some extent already. It’s not exactly encouraging that since 2014 Fidesz has lost all by-elections. They were usually explained away as products of unusual local circumstances, but it’s getting increasingly likely that it will happen in a lot of places.

    I still expect Fidesz to win, but not by a large margin.

    Also recently websites have popped up showing the most viable (popular) opposition candidates in most districts, so now voters already have the information. Orbán probably didn’t understand the possibilities of the internet.

    • Replies: @bb.
    that's on the assumption that people MUST vote against Orban whoever is available. As far as I can tell, that's not automatically the case. Voter apathy might prevail as well, in which case Orban profits, or Jobbik, which is unhandshakeworthy more from the left than from the right anyways and just effectively block any coalition.

    Did the lefties in Hungary adapt anti-immigrationism yet? In Slovakia, the whole country is basically united in this case so it is not really a voter issue.
  • @Matra
    Though I still expect Orbán to win in April, his odds have considerably worsened in recent weeks. There is now a serious chance of Fidesz not getting a majority.

    Any particular reason for his worsening chances?

    A number of scandals rocked his party (some corruption scandals involving his close family members, but not all scandals were corruption related), but the most important thing is that already in 2014 he didn’t have a majority of the votes.

    The Hungarian election system since 2014 is a mix of first past the post and (to a smaller extent) proportional representation. (Even the latter favors the winner.) Before Orbán changed it, it had a similar system, but one where the MP districts had a second round, unless someone received the majority of the votes. So parties could run separately and then after the first round of voting they could form an alliance.

    Orbán changed the system because he understood that for the opposition (which was divided, even without Jobbik) would need to form an alliance in order to be competitive. However, some of the leftist parties were discredited in the eyes of the majority of the electorate (and the voters of Jobbik and the leftists were often incompatible), and so an alliance would have destroyed a large portion of the appeal of the other leftist parties (not to mention Jobbik).

    However, that seems to have changed recently. Moreover, there has been open talk of “cross-voting” even with Jobbik, so in many places the parties won’t even have to form an alliance (which, less than three weeks before the election, they have still failed to do anyway), their voters in each district will be voting for the most popular opposition candidate (and now this seems to include Jobbik), and they are encouraging their voters to do so.

    It’s a question how many of the voters will actually do so, but I think the floodgates have opened to some extent already. It’s not exactly encouraging that since 2014 Fidesz has lost all by-elections. They were usually explained away as products of unusual local circumstances, but it’s getting increasingly likely that it will happen in a lot of places.

    I still expect Fidesz to win, but not by a large margin.

    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    Also recently websites have popped up showing the most viable (popular) opposition candidates in most districts, so now voters already have the information. Orbán probably didn’t understand the possibilities of the internet.
    , @reiner Tor

    So parties could run separately and then after the first round of voting they could form an alliance.
     
    The second round had the three best performing candidates, and it wasn't necessary to get the majority in the second round. Therefore, cooperation between at least the two largest opposition parties (with some candidates, usually, but not always, the weakest ones, withdrawing from the race) was still needed. But they didn't have to do it until after the first round.
  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    Or it could be that a nation such as Russia has yet to untangle some several hundred years of central authority style leadership and taking on democratic principle is just not as breezy as assumed.


    As such Russia still gravitates towards "a strong man" style of leadership. And Pres Putin is a reasonable, seasoned, astute strong leader, who doesn't fold in the face of adversity.

    As such Russia still gravitates towards “a strong man” style of leadership.

    Ironically it was the US and its ((advisers)) that first handed all of the Russian wealth over to the ((oligarchs)), and then, later, supported Yeltsin when he illegally dissolved the Rada and arrested their leaders (generally known as the 1993 Russian constitutional crisis) (they had also supported him earlier, back when he was only President of the Russian Soviet Socialist Republic and Gorbachev was head honcho, when Yeltsin sent tanks to bomb the Rada/Parliament, during the so-called “August coup”). As a result, so that “their man” had all the authority he needed to crush any dissent, the US and “West” fully supported the “authoritarian” Constitution adopted later that year to cement Yeltsin’s powers.

    But of course now they blame Putin and the “Russian character” for it. Because, you know, that is how the “West” rolls.

    taking on democratic principle is just not as breezy as assumed

    Yes and that is why there is not one country, aside perhaps from Switzerland, that is even remotely democratic. The US is an utter oligarchic tyranny. Some other countries in Europe may have some minimal claim at a semblance of democracy but it all collapses under closer scrutiny. Heck many European countries still have their monarchies, including, probably in the most extreme form, the UK.

  • @AOL
    @Alexander Peters, pro tip: nowadays nobody falls for the trick of putting unsupported assertions in the predicate of the sentence. That doesn't actually make it more convincing. It might work at a site that's not run by a physicist for people with a proper liberal education. But here, not so much.

    Another pro tip: demonizing the leader is kind of trite, having been tried with mixed success on Saddam, Kim, Qaddafy, Arafat, Khomeni, Khameni, Amedinejad, Amejinedinejinejanejad and so on. All the foreign devils just blur into one another and our eyes glaze over. It also sounds as if you never heard of СБРФ. That is who's eating your lunch. In fact you can't talk sense without considering the state as a whole.

    To that end, here are some documented facts about the Russian state.

    http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/ENACARegion/Pages/RUIndex.aspx

    In these documents, prepared by civil society and international experts acting in their personal capacity, you will find actual issues worth thinking about. Not Putin is short, or he rides a horse. You can readily compare those issues to America's, or Israel's, or Ukraine's, to understand just where Russia fits in terms of all the legal duties the state bears.

    Big error! Demonizing works very well. Just look at how Trump is portrayed by the media, academia, entertainment and a large part of the GOP.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Trump does make it easy for them.
  • AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:
    @Anonymous
    Putin and Trump are controversial puppets that serve respective national interests. Trump puppet is a return to the swagger of the ugly American. Putin is composed and ruthless because people end up dead after a button is pushed or something every American remembers from grade school propaganda. Both puppets have fan bases around the world and in each of their countries. Each country tries to show its own citizens and the rest of the world how honest and true their fake money drenched voting frauds are. The most Democratic and free countries where the sheep have a vote are incidentally the world's leading weapons manufacturers: US, Russia and China.

    Anon from TN
    There is one little problem with your claim: in China, people are not allowed to choose national leaders, even via fake vote. Another is that Putin enjoys much greater genuine support in Russia than Trump in the US, Merkel in Germany, or Macron in France, not to mention pathetic lame duck May in the UK. I don’t know how widespread is the support of Xi in China, but it can’t be lower that that of Trump, Merkel, or May in their countries. Personally, I am no fan of Putin, but I admire his ability to win kudos for Russia with a fairly weak hand (Xi also tends to win kudos for his country, but his cards are much stronger). This most likely explains Western hysteria.

    • Replies: @Medvedev
    Dishonesty, hysteria and russophobia of the West helps to propel Putin's support among Russians during elections. If it hadn't been for the West Putin support might have sunk long ago. What do we have as a result? Even if the elections were rigged a bit the second and the third candidate with the most voter support are definitively not pro-Western.
    Here's piece of news about Russia https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/03/21/us-russian-crew-blasts-of-for-the-iss-from-kazakhstan/ If Russians are so evil why do we collaborate with them? Why do we use their help to send astronauts to space? But most mainstream media doesn't report news like this. Instead we get constant bashing of Russia in the media, Russian collusion, Russian meddling in the US elections, chemical attack in Syria, Russians intelligence services (or whoever) killing people in London etc.
    How about proper investigation, fact checking, trying to be impartial for a sec in order to find the actual offender? Nah, too hard. Let's just show some photos of children in Syria and bomb the sh*t out of Assad. Or declare murder in London as Russian attack on UK sovereignty and expel all Russian diplomats.
  • @yurivku

    Thank you Israel. You really know what you are wiriting about.
     
    ad hominen detected. Israel really knows as well as I do what is going on here.

    I am a virulent anti-Communist, and that includes the pseudo-capitalistic oligarchic Bolshevism practiced in the West...
     
    It's up to you. But let us (Russians) to decide how we'll build our future. All the problems arise from attempts of the West to transfer its f#cken "values" around the world.

    ad hominen detected. Israel really knows as well as I do what is going on here.

    So if he is living in Jaffa, Stockholm and Moscow (in which order?), how does he find so much time to spend in Yakut and get the pulse of the place? Russia is a big place to travel around, with many different languages, cultures, etc. And many people have many opinions. Spare us the “I know Russia” crap. All you have is your opinion.

    But let us (Russians) to decide how we’ll build our future.

    First of all it is not me that is interfering in anything in Russia. But Israel, what is he, Israeli, Swede, Russian, something else? Anybody know? He seems to try to influence much more. But that’s OK with you as he is Communist, yes?

    All the problems arise from attempts of the West to transfer its f#cken “values” around the world.

    Even if that were true, “Communism” is most definitely a “Western value”. Or didn’t they teach you that in your grade school?

    • Replies: @Dmitry

    First of all it is not me that is interfering in anything in Russia. But Israel, what is he, Israeli, Swede, Russian, something else? Anybody know? He seems to try to influence much more. But that’s OK with you as he is Communist, yes?

     

    He is journalist/columnist that writes around monthly for Komsomolskaya Pravda in Russia. I was surprised he answers questions here. As for his name - he is actually anti-Israel, ironically.
  • AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:

    Anon from TN
    For the sake of the majority of readers who don’t speak Russian Mr. Shamir should have translated the poster shown in the picture. It says on one side “March 18, 2018”, and on the other “Strong president – strong Russia!” Without Western meddling in Syria and Ukraine this slogan would have been useless. The effect of Western propaganda is clearly reflected in the fact that more than 84% of voters residing outside Russia chose Putin, much more than those residing in the country (less than 77%). Mr. Shamir also should have mentioned that March 18 was not just a random date: it was the fourth anniversary of Crimea rejoining Russia. As could be expected, in Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, the fraction of Putin vote was even greater than in the rest of Russia, more than 90%. The people there remember who they should thank for their escape from the Ukrainian madhouse. All these little tricks certainly helped Putin, but this help was predicated on an insane anti-Putin propaganda campaign in the West. I am saying insane for a reason. Russian people have learned their lesson: there will never be another Yeltsin or Gorbachev in Russia. In fact, the West will rue the day Putin is gone.

    • Replies: @Sergey Krieger
    Agree. It looks like Gorbo-Yeltsyn betrayal was a culmination of Russia misplaced desire to join to be like the West. I also wondered about difference in national psych. When the West liked something it just wanted to take It, not to be like it and Russia instead of wanting to take over what she liked wanted to be like it. It led to self betrayal and catastrophe. Russia did have 2 chances to take over Europe in 1813-1814 and in 1945.
  • @Avery
    Considering the DNC machine rigged the Democratic primaries and derailed Bernie Sanders' run, and considering the entire Establishment came out in force to defeat Trump (e.g. Donna Brazile admitting she shared debate questions with Clinton campaign..... leaked audios, false accusations,....which are still ongoing.....), whatever shenanigans Putin campaign was involved in seem like the proverbial nothingburger.

    In comparison, Russian presidential elections appear to be far more democratic and clean than the putrid swamp the American presidential elections have become.

    Aside from the obvious legalized bribery (Citizens United), the absolute control of the corrupt 2-party system, the oligarchic and utterly undemocratic mass media, etc., we also had the case in 2000 that a bunch of unelected dictators-for-life “decided” the US election, clearly unlawfully. Bush vs. Gore.

    Yes, US is in no position to be lecturing anybody about “democracy”. But US is not short on chutzpah in any political realm.

  • @Anonymous
    If elections resulted in real change, the Russians and Yankees wouldn't have them. All theater for the zombies, aka the voting class. Only zombies would argue over the merits of the candidates. The US needs very little from its citizens. These includes obedience, widespread ignorance and the unquestioned belief they live in a Democracy because voting happens.

    The best slaves are the ones that lack the intelligence to recognize their own slavery. The happiest slaves know that voting is a rigged sham but don't care because the right master leads them.

    Or it could be that a nation such as Russia has yet to untangle some several hundred years of central authority style leadership and taking on democratic principle is just not as breezy as assumed.

    As such Russia still gravitates towards “a strong man” style of leadership. And Pres Putin is a reasonable, seasoned, astute strong leader, who doesn’t fold in the face of adversity.

    • Replies: @CalDre

    As such Russia still gravitates towards “a strong man” style of leadership.
     
    Ironically it was the US and its ((advisers)) that first handed all of the Russian wealth over to the ((oligarchs)), and then, later, supported Yeltsin when he illegally dissolved the Rada and arrested their leaders (generally known as the 1993 Russian constitutional crisis) (they had also supported him earlier, back when he was only President of the Russian Soviet Socialist Republic and Gorbachev was head honcho, when Yeltsin sent tanks to bomb the Rada/Parliament, during the so-called "August coup"). As a result, so that "their man" had all the authority he needed to crush any dissent, the US and "West" fully supported the "authoritarian" Constitution adopted later that year to cement Yeltsin's powers.

    But of course now they blame Putin and the "Russian character" for it. Because, you know, that is how the "West" rolls.


    taking on democratic principle is just not as breezy as assumed
     
    Yes and that is why there is not one country, aside perhaps from Switzerland, that is even remotely democratic. The US is an utter oligarchic tyranny. Some other countries in Europe may have some minimal claim at a semblance of democracy but it all collapses under closer scrutiny. Heck many European countries still have their monarchies, including, probably in the most extreme form, the UK.
    , @EugeneGur

    Russia has yet to untangle some several hundred years of central authority style leadership and taking on democratic principle is just not as breezy as assumed.
     
    This is such a cliche phrase. Could you specify where exactly do you see stellar examples of "democratic principles" ? In the UK with its unelected upper chamber of the parliament and the Prime Minister, also not elected directly by the citizens? In the US, with its two-party system in indirect elections? In Australis, with its compulsory voting?

    Today's Russia is as democratic as any Western country, more so than some. Whatever peculiarities our political system has is due to our history, the same as in any other country. The same as in the UK, with their "constitutional" monarchy in the absence of actual constitution. The same as in the US, with their voting system designed by Founding Fathers. Russia is large and divers; some centralized authority is needed to keep it together structurally and mentally, that is all.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Fact is, Western stupidity and grotesque lies of Western propaganda did more for Putin’s electoral success that pro-Putin propaganda. Speak of unintended consequences. In 2013 Putin’s approval hovered at ~45%. Nazi coup in Ukraine and reunification with Crimea increased it to 65-70%. Recent British hysterics, where the versions change every day, each new one more fantastic than the preceding ones, with more gaping holes in it, added another 5% at least. Officially, Putin got more than 76% of the vote with participation of more than 67% of eligible voters. This time around he did not need any underhanded tricks. Thus, more than 51% of eligible voters supported him. This is the level Western politicians can’t even dream of: Trump was elected by 26% of eligible voters, Merkel’s party got even less. Even if Mr. Shamir’s numbers are correct, Putin got higher fraction of the votes than any Western politician in living memory. Putin should thank Trump, May, Merkel, Macron, and others for his resounding electoral success.
    As to Mr. Karlin, who pretends to be a pro-Russian blogger, he was wrong, as usual. Nothing new there.

    Putin and Trump are controversial puppets that serve respective national interests. Trump puppet is a return to the swagger of the ugly American. Putin is composed and ruthless because people end up dead after a button is pushed or something every American remembers from grade school propaganda. Both puppets have fan bases around the world and in each of their countries. Each country tries to show its own citizens and the rest of the world how honest and true their fake money drenched voting frauds are. The most Democratic and free countries where the sheep have a vote are incidentally the world’s leading weapons manufacturers: US, Russia and China.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    There is one little problem with your claim: in China, people are not allowed to choose national leaders, even via fake vote. Another is that Putin enjoys much greater genuine support in Russia than Trump in the US, Merkel in Germany, or Macron in France, not to mention pathetic lame duck May in the UK. I don’t know how widespread is the support of Xi in China, but it can’t be lower that that of Trump, Merkel, or May in their countries. Personally, I am no fan of Putin, but I admire his ability to win kudos for Russia with a fairly weak hand (Xi also tends to win kudos for his country, but his cards are much stronger). This most likely explains Western hysteria.
    , @jilles dykstra
    In my opinion, if any political leader is not a puppet, it is Putin.
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    If elections resulted in real change, the Russians and Yankees wouldn’t have them. All theater for the zombies, aka the voting class. Only zombies would argue over the merits of the candidates. The US needs very little from its citizens. These includes obedience, widespread ignorance and the unquestioned belief they live in a Democracy because voting happens.

    The best slaves are the ones that lack the intelligence to recognize their own slavery. The happiest slaves know that voting is a rigged sham but don’t care because the right master leads them.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    Or it could be that a nation such as Russia has yet to untangle some several hundred years of central authority style leadership and taking on democratic principle is just not as breezy as assumed.


    As such Russia still gravitates towards "a strong man" style of leadership. And Pres Putin is a reasonable, seasoned, astute strong leader, who doesn't fold in the face of adversity.

  • Meddling in the Russian elections. I voted for Zhirinovsky on March 18, 2018. Have said all there is to say on that in these articles: An Analysis of Zhirinovsky's Program Russia Elections 2018: Elections as Regime Referendums Putin 2018: The Scorecard With that out of the way, let's move on to the bigger picture. PS....
  • @reiner Tor
    OT

    Though I still expect Orbán to win in April, his odds have considerably worsened in recent weeks. There is now a serious chance of Fidesz not getting a majority. I don’t know what will happen after that. Theoretically there could be a coalition, but now neither a Fidesz-Jobbik, nor a Jobbik-left coalition seems viable. Even the leftist parties seem to hate each other as much as they hate Fidesz.

    But I think Orbán will still probably win this time, but it’s likely his last cycle as prime minister.

    Though I still expect Orbán to win in April, his odds have considerably worsened in recent weeks. There is now a serious chance of Fidesz not getting a majority.

    Any particular reason for his worsening chances?

    • Replies: @reiner Tor
    A number of scandals rocked his party (some corruption scandals involving his close family members, but not all scandals were corruption related), but the most important thing is that already in 2014 he didn’t have a majority of the votes.

    The Hungarian election system since 2014 is a mix of first past the post and (to a smaller extent) proportional representation. (Even the latter favors the winner.) Before Orbán changed it, it had a similar system, but one where the MP districts had a second round, unless someone received the majority of the votes. So parties could run separately and then after the first round of voting they could form an alliance.

    Orbán changed the system because he understood that for the opposition (which was divided, even without Jobbik) would need to form an alliance in order to be competitive. However, some of the leftist parties were discredited in the eyes of the majority of the electorate (and the voters of Jobbik and the leftists were often incompatible), and so an alliance would have destroyed a large portion of the appeal of the other leftist parties (not to mention Jobbik).

    However, that seems to have changed recently. Moreover, there has been open talk of “cross-voting” even with Jobbik, so in many places the parties won’t even have to form an alliance (which, less than three weeks before the election, they have still failed to do anyway), their voters in each district will be voting for the most popular opposition candidate (and now this seems to include Jobbik), and they are encouraging their voters to do so.

    It’s a question how many of the voters will actually do so, but I think the floodgates have opened to some extent already. It’s not exactly encouraging that since 2014 Fidesz has lost all by-elections. They were usually explained away as products of unusual local circumstances, but it’s getting increasingly likely that it will happen in a lot of places.

    I still expect Fidesz to win, but not by a large margin.
  • The Russian presidential elections are blissfully over, for they were extremely nasty and embarrassing. Mr Putin could have won more modestly and plausibly. The election results would make Turkmenistan proud, if not North Korea. The turnout was quite high, 68%. The incumbent President received almost 77% of the vote, while his main contender Mr Grudinin’s...
  • @Anatoly Karlin

    ... who pretends to be a pro-Russian blogger, he was wrong, as usual. Nothing new there.
     
    Yes, only a mere third out of 58 people (with the best prediction of Putin's result).

    Completely wrong and useless, as always.

    Anon from TN
    As the Romans used to say (sometimes this phrase is claimed to belong to Prometheus), “Iuppiter iratus ergo nefas” (Jupiter, you are angry, therefore you are wrong).

    • Replies: @MarkU
    Are people not entitled to a little indignation if they are unreasonably slighted?
  • AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Alas, I stayed with USA friends, well educated middle class, where CNN was the only 'news' source.
    Three other USA acquaintances I visited in their homes, cannot remember having seen a newspaper other than a local one about marriages and funerals.
    The USA reminded me of the Peking court, that, when British warships were reported on the coast, responded with 'there had been so many pirates already'.
    In the Badlands, in a very small café, I identified myself as Dutch, from Holland, Netherlands.
    When all this did not ring bell I mentioned Europe, the first time in my life.
    This was understood.

    Anon from TN
    Now, that I believe. Due to dismal school system (purely parochial, no national standards, local boards full of ignoramuses decide what kids are taught in school) too many Americans sincerely believe that the world consists of three roughly equal parts: Main street, out-of-town, and overseas. I guess the election results in the last few decades show this clearly.

  • @Greg Bacon
    Interesting blog, but it would have been even more so with some verified links supporting Mr. Shamir's claims, as it is, they're nothing more than screeds that look like they were written for some foaming at the mouth CNN pseudo-intellectual.

    Guess that's to be expected from someone who has/goes by at least three different names.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Shamir#Background_and_personal_life

    Don’t know Shamir’s background. I am familiar with wikipedia – Judaized/Zionized deception and lies especially against someone who has written like Israel Shamir. FLOWERS OF GALILEE highly recommended. Wikipedia NOT.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    He's jew born in Russia.
    His parents went to Israel, what then was his age I do not know.
  • @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Fact is, Western stupidity and grotesque lies of Western propaganda did more for Putin’s electoral success that pro-Putin propaganda. Speak of unintended consequences. In 2013 Putin’s approval hovered at ~45%. Nazi coup in Ukraine and reunification with Crimea increased it to 65-70%. Recent British hysterics, where the versions change every day, each new one more fantastic than the preceding ones, with more gaping holes in it, added another 5% at least. Officially, Putin got more than 76% of the vote with participation of more than 67% of eligible voters. This time around he did not need any underhanded tricks. Thus, more than 51% of eligible voters supported him. This is the level Western politicians can’t even dream of: Trump was elected by 26% of eligible voters, Merkel’s party got even less. Even if Mr. Shamir’s numbers are correct, Putin got higher fraction of the votes than any Western politician in living memory. Putin should thank Trump, May, Merkel, Macron, and others for his resounding electoral success.
    As to Mr. Karlin, who pretends to be a pro-Russian blogger, he was wrong, as usual. Nothing new there.

    … who pretends to be a pro-Russian blogger, he was wrong, as usual. Nothing new there.

    Yes, only a mere third out of 58 people (with the best prediction of Putin’s result).

    Completely wrong and useless, as always.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    As the Romans used to say (sometimes this phrase is claimed to belong to Prometheus), “Iuppiter iratus ergo nefas” (Jupiter, you are angry, therefore you are wrong).
  • @EugeneGur

    Were the results falsified? Probably, up to a point,
     
    What an idiotic habit of saying thing when you have no evidence whatsoever to back them up. As they say, put up or shut up.

    Based on everything I know the elections were as clean as any elections could ever be. My personal sampling, however limited, also tells me that people went not just to vote, but to vote for Putin. The recent activity of our friends in West succeeded in mobilizing specifically Putin's electorate.


    And sociologist prognoses are of little value nowadays: they are tools of psychological warfare against the voter.
     
    Of course not - particularly, if you don't like the results.

    In the far-away Yakut province, with its mind-boggling frost of minus 35 ° below zero, the Communist contender has got almost 30% of the vote. ...On the other side, in the notoriously dishonest and despotic Muslim republic of Chechnya the contender was given less than 5%.
     
    Yes, Chechnya is notoriously dishonest and despotic, but Yakutya is a paragon of democracy. Really, Mr. Shamir? It's amazing how indulgence in wishful thinking can easily destroy even decent analytic abilities.

    Yakutia used to commit heavy electoral fraud (though not anywhere near Chechnya’s rates, where this was total), but they became clean during these elections.

    Ethnic minorities in Russia tend to vote more Communist (absent fraud).

  • @Twodees Partain
    "I watch CNN in order to know what the average USA citizens thinks."

    Unless that was meant as sarcasm, you're doing yourself a disservice. CNN is no more a credible source for what the average American thinks than the Soviet-era Pravda was.

    Alas, I stayed with USA friends, well educated middle class, where CNN was the only ‘news’ source.
    Three other USA acquaintances I visited in their homes, cannot remember having seen a newspaper other than a local one about marriages and funerals.
    The USA reminded me of the Peking court, that, when British warships were reported on the coast, responded with ‘there had been so many pirates already’.
    In the Badlands, in a very small café, I identified myself as Dutch, from Holland, Netherlands.
    When all this did not ring bell I mentioned Europe, the first time in my life.
    This was understood.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Now, that I believe. Due to dismal school system (purely parochial, no national standards, local boards full of ignoramuses decide what kids are taught in school) too many Americans sincerely believe that the world consists of three roughly equal parts: Main street, out-of-town, and overseas. I guess the election results in the last few decades show this clearly.
    , @Twodees Partain
    Jilles, maybe your American friends are simply ignorant and easily fooled. That is the type of people who make CNN their sole source of news. This doesn't make them average Americans, just CNN fans.

    If I came to visit a friend in Holland, and based my opinion of all Nederlanders on that friend and three others like him that I met while there, would you agree with me if I said that the average person in the Netherlands thought like my friend and his three friends?
    , @Alden
    It’s the “ well educated middle “ class who watch and believe CNN and the rest of the liberal propaganda channels.

    They are the brainwashed morons who believe what they see on TV and in the
    “Quality” press; NYTimes, The Nation Atlantic, New Republic etc.

    If you want to know what the really intelligent Americans who know that all the quality press and CNN are just a lot of lying propaganda,think, keep hanging out in this site, Amren vdare and you will find dissident realistic truthful news.

    Of course these sites are kept going by uneducated redneck hillbilly manual workers and other deplorable losers to immigrant workers at all levels from dishwasher to Dr.

    The more educated an American is, the more he or she believes CNN and the rest of the lying press.
  • @Michael Kenny
    The idea that Putin staged the British attack so as to generate a nationalist backlash in the election had crossed my mind. It probably had some effect and that led to the overkill the author is referring to. The fact that Both Putin's and Grudinin's results were significantly out of line with the polls suggests rigging on behalf of both of them, all the more so as the results obtained by the other candidates were essentially what the polls predicted. More importantly, though, Putin has (once again!) shot himself in the foot. Nobody really beleives the official results, including the voter turnout, but even if you take the official numbers, the election has been pretty much a disaster for him. Only about half the electorate voted for him, with about one third refusing to vote at all, in spite of inducements and pressures, with about 17% voting for the various other candidates. From now on, therefore, claims by Putin's American supporters that he enjoys massive popular support will be laughed out of court. Roughly one Russian in two wants to see the last of him! Some of that is due to his hanging on too long. He has now been in effective power for 19 years and people are just bored with him. That happened to Thatcher after 11 years. Merkel is more or less finished after 13 years and even his most loyal supporters were glad to see François Mitterrand go after 14 years. Desire for change is part of human nature. For that very reason, I don't see Putin staying until 2024.

    The elections were only out of line with online “polls” brigaded by Grudinin’s supporters, not with official polls or exit polls.

    If Putin with 51% of the vote of all Russian eligible voters is illegitimate, then what does that make Trump whom only 25% of American voters supported?

  • AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:
    @RobinG
    You're truly delusional if you think CNN does NOT represent average American thinking, at least a large paart of it. Last week I suffered through a luncheon of 5 mature adults extolling Rachel Maddow. Sickening.

    Anon from TN
    Maybe I overestimate American citizens (I work at a top-rate University and communicate mostly with faculty and grad students), but I’d like to come to their defense. CNN (as well as FOX news, NYT, and other MSM) represent the views of the lower half of US citizens by IQ. As far as I can tell, blatant lies of Western propaganda achieved among the people with brains the same result as the Soviet propaganda: even if they state something truthful for a change, people would doubt that.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Is it possible you just communicate with the top 5% USA people with regard to IQ ?
    Or even a lower % ?
    One of the shocking events of my life was when I was summoned for being tested for compulsory military service, it was in 1961, if I remember correctly.
    The group that was there was, I suppose a representative sample of the Dutch.
    My idea 'a bunch of imbeciles'.
    Just having had contact with gymnasium and university people, my idea of the average Dutch clearly was all wrong.
    I must have forgotten by then primary school, where it was about the same.
    I met people with the same shock.
    , @RobinG
    You are in a tiny bubble, and just because your small, smart sample seems "woke," don't imagine IQ is any barometer for resistance to group-think and propaganda.

    Furthermore, don't assume that humans, high IQ or otherwise, are capable of extrapolation. My lunch group was composed of Christian activists who have [each] spent decades advocating for Palestinians. They are intimately aware of how propaganda has biased Americans for Israel. They have seen the film, Occupation of the American Mind. They know that only by persistent clever marketing, the Zionists sold the fraudulent "noble little Israel" myth.

    And yet, they accept unquestioningly the MSM fake news about ANY OTHER SUBJECT. I find this particularly galling, but I believe it's a form of denial they use because the cognitive dissonance would be just too much to bear.
    , @Sin City Milla
    I spend hours each day in a lunch spot that blares CNN. I always turn my back to the screen n put on headphones since I don't have time to re-verify simple facts like the sky is blue, facts which PravdCNN constantly seeks to bring into doubt.

    From my backward seat I get to observe the lunchgoers as they consume CNN-fare along with their lunch-fare, without myself having the misfortune of having to hear CNN or see the screen.

    What I see is extraordinary. People of all sorts sit n eat n stare with goggle eyes clearly sinking into an hypnotic state. Some stare with their mouths open. Some even forget to eat. Many become agitated n after leaving rush back to view the screen a second time. The shop employees are obsessed with it n often run to the screen to turn up the volume as if some great world crisis were erupting. Others swear n curse. This goes on for hours. Professional types, middle class people, even bums pause from their prohibited panhandling all stop n stare n absorb n clearly believe whatever the heck the screen is saying. None ever read books, they just sit n stare n react.

    On those rare occasions when I waste a moment by turning to look at the screen to verify that WW3 has truly broken out, all I ever see is Wolf Blitzer holding sheets of paper n the word Trump inching across the screen. I always regret wasting the moment turning to look when I could have read a few more words in my book.

    Indoctrination via habituation n hypnosis seems to be the chief message of CNN. When I check genuine news sources later on I always find that WW3 did not break out, that Trump is still the President, that the sky is actually blue n not green or red or polka dot n has not magically transformed itself into cloud images of the Martyr Hillary in Gaea sympathy with PC Cultists' lamentations.
  • AnonFromTN [AKA "Anon"] says:

    Anon from TN
    Fact is, Western stupidity and grotesque lies of Western propaganda did more for Putin’s electoral success that pro-Putin propaganda. Speak of unintended consequences. In 2013 Putin’s approval hovered at ~45%. Nazi coup in Ukraine and reunification with Crimea increased it to 65-70%. Recent British hysterics, where the versions change every day, each new one more fantastic than the preceding ones, with more gaping holes in it, added another 5% at least. Officially, Putin got more than 76% of the vote with participation of more than 67% of eligible voters. This time around he did not need any underhanded tricks. Thus, more than 51% of eligible voters supported him. This is the level Western politicians can’t even dream of: Trump was elected by 26% of eligible voters, Merkel’s party got even less. Even if Mr. Shamir’s numbers are correct, Putin got higher fraction of the votes than any Western politician in living memory. Putin should thank Trump, May, Merkel, Macron, and others for his resounding electoral success.
    As to Mr. Karlin, who pretends to be a pro-Russian blogger, he was wrong, as usual. Nothing new there.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin

    ... who pretends to be a pro-Russian blogger, he was wrong, as usual. Nothing new there.
     
    Yes, only a mere third out of 58 people (with the best prediction of Putin's result).

    Completely wrong and useless, as always.
    , @Anonymous
    Putin and Trump are controversial puppets that serve respective national interests. Trump puppet is a return to the swagger of the ugly American. Putin is composed and ruthless because people end up dead after a button is pushed or something every American remembers from grade school propaganda. Both puppets have fan bases around the world and in each of their countries. Each country tries to show its own citizens and the rest of the world how honest and true their fake money drenched voting frauds are. The most Democratic and free countries where the sheep have a vote are incidentally the world's leading weapons manufacturers: US, Russia and China.
  • @ValmMond

    The debates were even worse: Putin was exempt
     
    And so was Mr. Grudinin who didn't deign to participate in the debates in person and appointed a proxy instead. As much as I respect Maxim Shevtchenko (the "trusted person" in question) as a polemist and as a public figure, he has serious temper issues, which make him a disastrous debater.

    In fairness, although I dislike Grudinin, I recall that he did turn up in person to two of the three debates (IIRC he was occupied with another event during one of them).

    At any rate he was there in the one where Sobchak splashed Zhirik with water, and the one where Zhirik bullycided Sobchak off the stage.

  • @Israel Shamir
    Here is good one, alas in Russian https://pdsnpsr.ru/posts/politicheskie-issledovaniya/otkuda-u-putina-76-6-golosov-i-byli-li-oni-na-samom-dele_20032018

    Looks like this year’s example of the (fake) 146% for Putin meme.

  • Were the results falsified? Probably, up to a point,

    What an idiotic habit of saying thing when you have no evidence whatsoever to back them up. As they say, put up or shut up.

    Based on everything I know the elections were as clean as any elections could ever be. My personal sampling, however limited, also tells me that people went not just to vote, but to vote for Putin. The recent activity of our friends in West succeeded in mobilizing specifically Putin’s electorate.

    And sociologist prognoses are of little value nowadays: they are tools of psychological warfare against the voter.

    Of course not – particularly, if you don’t like the results.

    In the far-away Yakut province, with its mind-boggling frost of minus 35 ° below zero, the Communist contender has got almost 30% of the vote. …On the other side, in the notoriously dishonest and despotic Muslim republic of Chechnya the contender was given less than 5%.

    Yes, Chechnya is notoriously dishonest and despotic, but Yakutya is a paragon of democracy. Really, Mr. Shamir? It’s amazing how indulgence in wishful thinking can easily destroy even decent analytic abilities.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    Yakutia used to commit heavy electoral fraud (though not anywhere near Chechnya's rates, where this was total), but they became clean during these elections.

    Ethnic minorities in Russia tend to vote more Communist (absent fraud).
  • @Twodees Partain
    "I watch CNN in order to know what the average USA citizens thinks."

    Unless that was meant as sarcasm, you're doing yourself a disservice. CNN is no more a credible source for what the average American thinks than the Soviet-era Pravda was.

    You’re truly delusional if you think CNN does NOT represent average American thinking, at least a large paart of it. Last week I suffered through a luncheon of 5 mature adults extolling Rachel Maddow. Sickening.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    Anon from TN
    Maybe I overestimate American citizens (I work at a top-rate University and communicate mostly with faculty and grad students), but I’d like to come to their defense. CNN (as well as FOX news, NYT, and other MSM) represent the views of the lower half of US citizens by IQ. As far as I can tell, blatant lies of Western propaganda achieved among the people with brains the same result as the Soviet propaganda: even if they state something truthful for a change, people would doubt that.
    , @Twodees Partain
    No, Robin, I'm not delusional. CNN is the news source of choice for libtards, and I do not consider libtards "average Americans".

    Please seek help with your anger issues. Everyone who disagrees with your views isn't delusional, and you don't know everything about everything. You can go take your pill now.
  • @jilles dykstra
    I watch CNN in order to know what the average USA citizens thinks.
    For the same reason I each day look what the Dutch newspaper with the largest circulation writes.

    “I watch CNN in order to know what the average USA citizens thinks.”

    Unless that was meant as sarcasm, you’re doing yourself a disservice. CNN is no more a credible source for what the average American thinks than the Soviet-era Pravda was.

    • Replies: @RobinG
    You're truly delusional if you think CNN does NOT represent average American thinking, at least a large paart of it. Last week I suffered through a luncheon of 5 mature adults extolling Rachel Maddow. Sickening.
    , @jilles dykstra
    Alas, I stayed with USA friends, well educated middle class, where CNN was the only 'news' source.
    Three other USA acquaintances I visited in their homes, cannot remember having seen a newspaper other than a local one about marriages and funerals.
    The USA reminded me of the Peking court, that, when British warships were reported on the coast, responded with 'there had been so many pirates already'.
    In the Badlands, in a very small café, I identified myself as Dutch, from Holland, Netherlands.
    When all this did not ring bell I mentioned Europe, the first time in my life.
    This was understood.
  • those who identified themselves as Jewish left for Israel. There they learned that the Jews do not consider them being members of the Chosen People, and many of them trekked back to Russia, cured of their illusions.

    Mr. Shamir – I am hoping that you could clarify just how large the Russian/Ukrainian Jewish immigration is in Israel? A Greek friend of mine is under the impression that it’s quite large, and that many of these non ‘Chosen people’ have become Orthodox Christians. He also feels that Putin, as the new ‘Protector of Orthodoxy’ has much influence over these Jews in the Holyland? Any figures, any thoughts?…

  • The idea that Putin staged the British attack so as to generate a nationalist backlash in the election had crossed my mind. It probably had some effect and that led to the overkill the author is referring to. The fact that Both Putin’s and Grudinin’s results were significantly out of line with the polls suggests rigging on behalf of both of them, all the more so as the results obtained by the other candidates were essentially what the polls predicted. More importantly, though, Putin has (once again!) shot himself in the foot. Nobody really beleives the official results, including the voter turnout, but even if you take the official numbers, the election has been pretty much a disaster for him. Only about half the electorate voted for him, with about one third refusing to vote at all, in spite of inducements and pressures, with about 17% voting for the various other candidates. From now on, therefore, claims by Putin’s American supporters that he enjoys massive popular support will be laughed out of court. Roughly one Russian in two wants to see the last of him! Some of that is due to his hanging on too long. He has now been in effective power for 19 years and people are just bored with him. That happened to Thatcher after 11 years. Merkel is more or less finished after 13 years and even his most loyal supporters were glad to see François Mitterrand go after 14 years. Desire for change is part of human nature. For that very reason, I don’t see Putin staying until 2024.

    • Disagree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    The elections were only out of line with online "polls" brigaded by Grudinin's supporters, not with official polls or exit polls.

    If Putin with 51% of the vote of all Russian eligible voters is illegitimate, then what does that make Trump whom only 25% of American voters supported?
    , @Anonymous
    80 US Senators have been in office for at least 20 years. Hillary Clinton routinely boasted of 40+ years in politics. Perhaps the desire for change is smothered in the USA too.
    , @NoseytheDuke
    When you state that an idea crossed your mind, how on earth do you measure a time span of such a super short duration? Is it a nano second or one and a half?
  • @Alexander Peters
    As usual, UNZ offers a different and interesting point of view.
    But Mr. Shamir's analysis lacks crucial information.

    First, I am missing a clear rejection of dictator and war criminal Putin's politics.
    (We reject the American regime. Why not treat the Russian regime equally?)

    Second, we are not sure whether the same elite might be in control of both, the American and the Russian regime, since they seem to stabalize themselves and both exploit their population.

    Third, Mr. Shamir touches to lightly the possibility of the other parties being controlled opposition (by the Kremlin). In this case the election would be a complete scam. We need to be aware of how professionally the Russian gangster state is fooling their people. Mr. Putin's image is a complete media invention. He is an only 1,70 Meter small guy who used to be an unimportant KGB spy. Yet the Russian people see him riding horses and supposedly making smart business decisions. He probably isn't even making the decisions. In this regard, Trump is less ridiculous because at least everyone knows how ridiculous he is.

    Fourth, how the hell can the Communist party still be a thing?

    Which brings me to, Five, we need to start holding the Russian people accountable for their gouvernment. If they glorify Stalin and still keep Lenin's body in a mausoleum for visiting, if they accept their criminal leadership, if they spend more money on scam wonder healers than doctors, and if they keep spending money on weapons of mass destruction, then they deserve what's comming at them.

    This does not mean war, but even more economical sanctions. At the moment the world is driving towards a new Cold War. And it's not only the US that's to blame for it.

    , pro tip: nowadays nobody falls for the trick of putting unsupported assertions in the predicate of the sentence. That doesn’t actually make it more convincing. It might work at a site that’s not run by a physicist for people with a proper liberal education. But here, not so much.

    Another pro tip: demonizing the leader is kind of trite, having been tried with mixed success on Saddam, Kim, Qaddafy, Arafat, Khomeni, Khameni, Amedinejad, Amejinedinejinejanejad and so on. All the foreign devils just blur into one another and our eyes glaze over. It also sounds as if you never heard of СБРФ. That is who’s eating your lunch. In fact you can’t talk sense without considering the state as a whole.

    To that end, here are some documented facts about the Russian state.

    http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/ENACARegion/Pages/RUIndex.aspx

    In these documents, prepared by civil society and international experts acting in their personal capacity, you will find actual issues worth thinking about. Not Putin is short, or he rides a horse. You can readily compare those issues to America’s, or Israel’s, or Ukraine’s, to understand just where Russia fits in terms of all the legal duties the state bears.

    • Replies: @prusmc
    Big error! Demonizing works very well. Just look at how Trump is portrayed by the media, academia, entertainment and a large part of the GOP.