Southern Europeans have essentially zero negroid DNA. The only ones with any significant amount are Spaniards, and by significant, I mean 1-2%.

@ Moi Don’t worry ASAE white lose their supreme stuff, the MSM and the government they propagandize for, will turn on the non white.. diving and polarizing the masses is a game the MSM plays; it strives to use vote cancellation to divide and conquer.. 9 people on an Island, 1 is elected president, the one finds issues that divide the remaining 8 into two opposed groups.. when they vote the outcome is 4/8 votes for and 4/8 votes against, making it possible for the president to always win the elections.

my solution follows:

We Americans are governed by a functional republican form of government, known as the USA, it has become the government operated by the elected for the benefit of a few oligarchs. The few oligarchs are using their control over the USA to abuse us (white and non white) alike.

From the prospective of a voter in a republic, the focus should be on the quality of persons that government employs. People like Epstein victims, and the propaganda kings on the media are generally considered irresponsible trouble makers and should be removed from their positions and relieved of their power and denied any tools they might use to influence or make deals with the functional government.

I have said before and I say again.. The voters in America need oversight powers, not a different single government or different people in the existing functional government, but instead, the voters need an oversight government: a government that empowers the masses to crawl all over and to oversee the activities and to witness and report on the events conducted or hosted by the people that operate in, deal with, or lead the functional government. The functional government should focus on security, economic issues and develop and implement science and infrastructure to improve the economy and the quality of life for everyone within its jurisdictional scope. The people’s oversight government should make sure those in the functional government do the job expected of them.

But the bureaucrats, contractors and the elected (BCE) in the functional government sometimes use the position in governments to conduct vendettas (against a person or class of person or even against a nation the feel offensive toward). Often persons in functional government get carried away, express personal ambitions beyond the scope of their job, harbor ambitions beyond the scope and limit of the constitution or sometimes they use their positions to engage in fraud, abuses of humanity and corruption. It should be obvious at this point that the people who operate, control and lead the functional government are almost never concerned with human rights or moral issues involved in advancing personal or governmental goals. In fact, it might be argued that the employees and contractors involved with a functional republican type government must of necessity ignore conflicts between human rights in the pursuit of functional government goals.

How can human security and moral need be addressed by government? The bill of rights was forced on the framers of the constitution!. The original constitution issued from Philadelphia in 1787 did not contain any protection to the humanity the constitution was written to govern? If the framers had not yielded to the demands of those who were called upon to ratify the constitution, the constitution would not have been ratified. So the founders objected to the bill of rights (BOR); they argued functional government s\n care about human rights, because after all the framers had Aristocratic rights? Humanity everywhere should always be alert to abuse of government by those in power. Were does a human victim of a functional government sue for damage? Who has the power to punish, detain or sanction governments or its leaders and who can punish those who abuse humanity?

The BORs as amended into the constitutions delivered in a contract promises that=> persons in government w/n/b allowed to use government or to allow people in government to abuse the govern? But=> constitutional amendments (are mere clauses in a contract, worse, a contract that the people in the functional government never signed or agreed to, the BORs were amended into the constitution). Mostly the BOR describe procedural process to cover situations where the government deals with a citizen, and the BOR also prohibit government or its people from infringing into certain spaces (religious space, speech space, publish space, etc.). Basically the BOR amendments in the constitution says government will protect citizens from abuses by government: if you go to school with a weapon or if you join fellow voters and protest against wrongful or controversial conditions, etc. Now if you believe those words in that constitution will save your ass, I have a bridge in Boston.. Historically the functional government has violated its BOR promises time and again. There is no place of authority (no independent court) for citizens to bring grievances against either the government as a whole or the persons in government who used the government as a tool to abuse the governed.

We all know about Japanese concentration camps, Guantanamo Bay prisons, American Indian genocide, legalized slavery, government backed corporate labor wars, and global renditions,. etc.). Basically, we have the same condition today the colonist were faced with in 1776.. in that case the British government was operating without regard to the rights, needs and expectations of the mass of the governed. The British were the globalist, in possession of the mightest of military and naval power, and were granting Aristocrat privileges to its few citizens in America and their mostly British corporations operating in colonial America who were given special and favored opportunity over American corporations and business interest.

The above I think fully justifies the need for a government to be operated by the masses: for the masses to oversee the functional government. An oversight government funded by 10% of the amounts the functional government raises in tax revenues. with an independent court system empowered to hear all cases brought by voters charging persons serving in governments with wrongdoings. Such oversight authority would empower every single voter to bring to the voter’s court charges against anyone, including contractors and agents, in or for the functional government. Such oversight would be of four types: negligence, incompetence, fraud or corruption while in service of the functional government. The people’s court judges would ascertain if the charges had sufficient reason to allow the case to move forward and if it did, the citizen would be the Plaintiff and the functional government or its agent would be the defendant.

The modern nation state with a republican kind of government, is dependent on its people, agents and contractors for its proper functioning. Currently, when the people in the functional government are are non functional, corrupt, fraudulent or ambitious beyond their job function there is little the governed can do to correct wrongs. Why? Because the nature of a republican functioning government is that a few are given all of the power and authority to run the functional government and the few can run such a government in secret if they wish. Except for an occasional minimal vote in elections, the masses are excluded and victimized. The functional government is an armed structure which operates in near-total secret and its contractors and agents spy on the masses.

Some means of checking wrongful actors who are engaged in functional government operations is needed. Such a mechanism must minimize interference with the operations of the functional government, but at the same time, the mechanism needs to operate in parallel and (interactively complementary with) the functional government. The governed masses need veto power over laws the functional government attempts to make law, to be sure that the laws fit needs of the governed masses which host the functional government. After all, there is no reason for a government if the government does not serve and satisfy the needs of the governed.

I believe only an oversight government with a people’s court, veto power over functional government made law or decision (general elections to veto/approve any law the functional government passes) is the only way to keep the functional government focused on improving the lot of masses instead of developing and promoting private or special interest agenda. It seems to me empowering oversight government to operate in parallel with the functional government would help to weed out those in the functional government that are bad apples and serve to block bad laws that are unnecessarily burden the governed.

90% of present day North Africans have black ancestry. Before the Islamic conquest, North Africans were Caucasians. St. Augustine and Hannibal are examples of these North African Caucasions. The average IQ of today’s North Africans is 83. This is because of their black ancestry. Black ancestry lowers IQ.

Latin America is heterogeneous and the countries must be looked at. Cuba, Puerto Rico, Brazil, Panama have large black populations. Mexico, Central America, Bolivia are Amerindian countries. Caucasians (mostly European) rule these countries. Dark-skinned Latin Americans get their darkness either from being Amerindian or black. The caste system is fairly accurate in Latin America.

“Our government and the capitalist pigs want us dead and gone.”

I hope here, by “capitalist pigs”, you mean state capitalists that use the coercive nature of the state to achieve their ends through state-granted privileges as the mercantilists did as opposed to meaning people who freely engage in voluntary transactions.

Once again Twaddledum, you prove that your IQ is less than 89 because of your functional illiteracy.

I did not state that I wanted people to stop writing articles. I don’t believe in censorship. I was pointing out that Devlin’s link to a Derbyshire article on white supremacy proved Devlin’s cucked idiocy.

Methinks you doth protesteth too much because it seems you have a yen for “Oriental dishes.” Tastes like yours cause many problems. We can see what has happened to Derbyshire because of his yen for commie Chinese takeout.

Maybe you should start looking for a place to live in Asia.

said:
“What a stupid article. Devlin doesn’t make a single point that his readers haven’t heard and affirmed a hundred times.”

Like where? Give us a few.

Sure the Jews are the pied pipers of the hate whitey thing and the instigators of pure evil historic mass murders, but absent the fool whites who went along with their murderous plans there would not have been the Bolshevik terror.

Speaking of Bolshevik terror, we have a form a terrorism in the constant fake shootings, meant to demonize whites and to outlaw guns. In the phony Philly shooting, of course an AR-15 is involved. This time the fake shooter is black though.

But to your point, look at the treasonous white police partaking in the charade.

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=A8W7SD29ODNY

A very good didactic step-by-step explanation of the Jewish Project spawned from Tavistock Institute’s and Frankfurt School’s rulebook for Jewish preeminence. Indeed, the cultural foundation of Jewish supremacy is a sine qua non factor for their ascendancy to positions of state power, but one should also take into account the socio-economic conditions which facilitated their success. In other words, Capitalism is the thriving ground for an exclusivist elite to gain power, influence and wealth.

You cannot ignore the reality of market capitalism leading necessarily to higher concentration of capital and power into fewer hands and corporate hegemony. It’s axiomatic. What is a Rothschild or Soros going to do with a huge fortune he cannot consume in a million life-times but to play the game of re-organising society according to his distorted cultural vision?

By the way, you managed to make a sensible exposition without invoking the commie boogeyman – the unavoidable companion of the dimmer commentariat.

” It was in this sense that Tucker Carlson quite accurately described white supremacy as a hoax.”

This is a bizarre article. One the one hand it identifies white supremacy and at the same time calls it a hoax.

good grief. When a reference to white supremacy is made it simply contends, that the country organized itself around a power play to advance the agenda to white benefit and engaged in policies to prevent the same of others.

Simple, no need to drag in Nazis or even the KKK, though they might be legitimate organizations to espouse such views, an accounting of the country’s history makes a clear case that it did engage in such policies and practices nationwide. And did so even when said policies and practices were against the law. And that after 200 years the ethic was prevalent, that it need not be a policy, but was endemic to the very understanding of the country.

Now one can certainly argue how prevalent such ethos is today or how influential — but one would have to be a person of total ignorance or deep denial to say the matter is a hoax. it’s a bizarre take given all we know about the country and most serious people who have that historical background —

will and should look at anyone making the claim of nonexistence sideways.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=BwOe9UzxDu0

John Derbyshire lives in your head, rent free. You are going to vapor lock and stroke out some day if you don’t learn how to deal with the fact that some people are still going to write articles here regardless of how much you hate them.

Looks like all the s/w issues have been resolved, save one:

The comments to PG’s article Did Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Work for Mossad? are hidden for some reason.

How about using the phrase White Christian Preservationists – people of European descent and traditions who believe that their identity and families are worth preserving. So that whem Marxist lefty protests you put THEM on the defensive and ask, “So are you telling me the my family and group dont have a right to exist? That we roll over and go extinct? Is that what you want, Ms. Silvertein?”. Use their own passive agressive arguements against them.

It’s those of the “greatest generation” (WW2) who were cowed by the REAL victors of WW2 that foisted the whole “civil-rights” movement on us.
The JEWS (zionists) were the real winners of WW2, and were the “civil-rights” handlers and promoters in the 1950s.
Boomers cannot be blamed for this…or for our present situation…
Thanks, “greatest generation” for NOTHING…

White men haven’t used their guns to fight for their fellow Whites since the end of the Indian wars 1880.

So what use are White men’s guns nowadays? Most White men on the pro White conservative sites don’t even know who to aim their gun at if it comes to a real fight for White survival.
Hint; it’s not the blacks and browns

Your odds of getting shot by a white male spree killer are much lower than your odds of getting struck by lightning.

If you are really worried, I suggest you never leave your house. Get some cats if you start to feel lonely.

Good comment, Alden.

Our government set up a whole trelliswork of “civil rights” laws, as I see it, that presumes America’s Whites all the time and everywhere and forever seek to undermine Blacks, even in communities without a Black population, or those far removed from the Deep South’s de jure segregation. White folks still don’t understand how those laws amount to a massively unfair permanent accusation against White folks who are completely innocent of any racial animus. That’s most of us.

Some Black folks have understood those “civil rights” laws as a ticket to “get Whitey, ’cause he’s weak”. The latest iteration of that is “reparations”, a shakedown racket if there ever was one.

Most Christians are not very political, which is fine, and they are intimidated by Jewish intellect and competence. They know, explicitly or subliminally, that Jews have defeated them for the dominant position in the West and, as Christians, their natural reaction to that is meek acceptance. Unfortunately this often takes the less honorable form of trying to out-do each other in praise of their conquerors.

The second and third highest polling Democrats, Warren and Sanders are abject white haters. They can’t stop talking about their hatred of white people. If it were not for anti-white, whites…they wouldn’t have a chance. When the SHTF the anti-white, whites must be the first dealt with.

The real tragedy is that their numbers are legion. And they are the reason we are in the state we are in.

Sure the Jews are the pied pipers of the hate whitey thing and the instigators of pure evil historic mass murders, but absent the fool whites who went along with their murderous plans there would not have been the Bolshevik terror.

Anti-white whites, liberals for lack of a better word, represent a real threat to your freedom and your life.

No offense, but I think some of you guys go a little overboard on the Jews.

Sure, Jews in general have played a hugely disproportionate role in undermining the West.

But do you really think it’s impossible for any individual jew to be on the right side of anything?

And Zionism is just naked nationalism on behalf of their own tribe. The only thing wrong with Zionists is that they are bloody hypocrites who think they get to be nationalists but whites don’t.

Russians are White and in the United States are by law to be treated as untouchables in terms of high school admission college admissions hiring for every job from doctor to dishwasher business loans business contracts business licenses personal loans and everything.

You’re defending soviet communism. Fine, that’s your opinion.

We, American Whites are discussing the vicious government imposed racial discrimination against us. Our government and the capitalist pigs want us dead and gone. It’s not even getting rid of us to import filth world cheap labor. It’s just plain hatred of us.

In your terms, the employers liberals and government are the evil Tzarist Cossack slaughtering the peaceful demonstrators of 1905. We Whites are the peaceful demonstrators.

The enemy of American Whites are the descendants of Russian. communist Jews who arrived in America 1870 to 1930. They hate we White Americans with a deep and abiding absolute passion. They hate the Russian non Jews as much as they hate American Whites.

White Trashionalists (and their female counterparts, the fat bluehaired feminists) can’t even get invited to the parties that functional white people throw.

No wonder they want to mooch off of us. We rightfully shield our social capital from this wastematter subrace.

Rurik, if you listen to the POC and take them seriously, they are saying that you, and white people generally, are a deadly threat to themselves and to their descendants. In this they are correct, whatever your personal intention.

Historically, every society that has come into contact with the West since the Western breakout from Europe in c.a. AD 1492 has either had to reorganize itself (usually after a complete collapse) or the inhabitants at the time of contact left very few descendants today.

The West was, comparatively, superhuman. It had organization and equipment that nobody else on the planet had; it also had germ warfare (unintentional, to be sure, but real). The entire Americas had no immunities to Eurasian diseases, which enabled handsfull of Spaniards to conquer immense, albeit neolithic, populations. In China and India, the immense population was not only unable to drive off the Europeans, but were themselves increasingly disorganized, apparently just from the contact in China and from conquest of the Islamic states in India.

The world is scared stiff of whites, and pissed off simultaneously, a bad combination for dumb people (see “Idiocracy”).

So he’s really scared of you, and considers himself daring for even talking to you. He’s also contempuous, strangely enough. That’s partly a front to keep himself bold.

My point here is that _there is nothing that can change this situation_. In the contemporary world, the European/Russian descended are still the only people who have successfully lived in an industrial society since, say, 1850. Every other group is just starting (e.g. China, India), or has too little cognitive ability and to little impulse control, to live in an industrial society.

So, what they’re saying is that “I can’t live in a European derived society, and, for the sake of my life, I want you to destroy your European derived society and live in a society that _I_ will construct.” In Africa, living a much poorer and shorter life is justified politically by saying that the tradeoff is well worth it, and they would rather live a poor and violent life that they control than a moderate and peaceful life that they do not control.

In other words, the conflict can be re-phrased in terms of conflicting fundamental issues. Once this is done, it is clear that there is no real resolution in less than evolutionary time (millennia, most likely).

Either the whites can give up their society in what amounts to a massacre (as the Yankeedom and New Netherland cultural areas want them to do, http://www.colinwoodard.com/files/ColinWoodard_AmericanNations_map.pdf), or they can keep it at the expense of a fight. There are no other choices.

Lord, I hate reorganizations.

Counterinsurgency

Pro-Israel and wars on their behalf is what Fox News represents.

They are definitely not the friends of white people.

Watch Hannity and you will get sick at his slavish devotion to Israel.

Another ignoramus blames White women for the on going destruction of White Americans. It was done by WHITE MEN, not White women.

80 percent of the damage was done in just 5 years, 1968 to 1973 and all done by White men

What White men did to White Americans

1948 White man President Truman desegregated the military

1956 An all White male Supreme Court and White man President Eisenhower desegregated the public schools.

1964 White man President Johnson his VP Humphrey an all White male senate and 98% White male Congress critters passed the civil rights for all but Whites civil rights act.

1965. White men, Johnson, Humphrey the entire senate and the 98% congress passed the unlimited non White immigration act.

1968 White men Johnson, Humphrey the entire senate and 98% White male congress passed the affirmative action for all but Whites act. Only 1% of the senate & congress were women at the time, actually less, 5 out of 535.

1969 another White man, Nixon becomes president. He appoints another White man, Levin to Johnson’s newly created EEOC. Together, Levin and Nixon change equal employment opportunity to No Whites need apply because it’s illegal to hire Whites.

1970 Nixon, a White man, creates the affirmative action eligible Hispanic race by executive order.

1973 comes the worst blow to White men, Griggs vs Duke Power. Essentially, the all White male Supreme Court declares that companies and government agencies MUST hire the most unqualified black instead of a qualified White.

“ Disproportionate representation is clear and present evidence of discrimination” wrote White man Chief Justice Brennan of the Supreme Court in the majority opinion

That 9 word sentence is the reason there are 90 pound 5 ft. tall Chinese woman fire fighters and black women who can’t read working in every government agency in the country.

Then there’s another 100% White male Supreme Court decision

1978 Kaiser vs Weber. The all White male Supreme Court decided that black steel mill foremen didn’t need a high school diploma and didn’t need to be able to read or do basic math.

Another no White need apply decision made by a White male Supreme Court. Kaiser is just a reiteration if Griggs.

1968 to 1973 and all done by White men, Republicans and Democrats.

I won’t even mention that the White men who own the entire private medical engineering computer and scientific business sector would rather go to China Asia India and Africa for employees than hire an American. White man.

TKK, he isn’t falling for anything, he’s trolling. He’s just another hit and run troll who will be gone soon.

Many members of certain minority groups sense White Christian weakness and are taking advantage of it.

They are attempting a takeover.

Mexico is trying a demographic takeover of California and states in the southwest.

Read the book Camp of the Saints.

It is not too late for White Christians to save themselves. They must come out onto the street.

They can’t say they’re White “nationalists” or “supremacists”. Those would be attacked by the leftist-dominated media and Democrats. The latter are largely anti-White Christian.

They have to use other terms such as Christian pride, Christian freedom, European heritage pride, Christian patriotism day, and European heritage day.

White Christians have to be comfortable enough to hit the streets.

There should be resolutions in Congress to celebrate European and White heritage. Who would sponsor that? Maybe Cong. Steve King?

How’s your uncle’s garden shed this summer? Cupertino’s not very hot, but the sun beating on a tin shed all day.

I’ve noticed the issues the last 2-3 days.

Northern Africans are Caucasians. Some have Sub Saharan ancestry. Many Latin Americans of European ancestry have some Sub Saharan ancestry too. Many Southern Europeans have some North African ancestry. Purity is not what I was talking about. North Africans, West Asians, Southern Europeans and Northern Europeans have the majority of their DNA that is what is now called Caucasian.

https://www.livescience.com/37092-southern-europeans-have-african-genes.html

Southern Europeans get a significant portion of their genetic ancestry from North Africa, new research suggests.

The findings are perhaps not surprising, given that the Romans occupied North Africa and set up extensive trade routes in the region, and the Moors, a North African people, ruled a medieval territory called El-Andalus on the Iberian Peninsula.

So Devlin writes an article about “white supremacy” and starts it by referring to John Derbyshire. As a reminder, Derbyshire is married to a Chinese communist female and has Chinese offspring. The Chinese wife and daughter voted for Obummer. Derbyshire has written that Asians are smarter than whites. They are not and had nothing to do and contributed nothing to Western civilization.

Devlin hangs out with the Jew-controlled Jared Taylor. Here is a podcast where Taylor babbles about how there is no place in North America for whites:
https://www.amren.com/podcasts/2019/08/141999/ – the 55 min. mark. Pure degeneracy and madness. Taylor is always babbling that Northeast Asians and Jews are smarter than whites. They are not.

Devlin is another example of the cucked Western male who just scribbles but can’t do anything because of the company he keeps.

E. Michael Jones is correct that using the term “white” will automatically give Western peoples a disadvantage. This is why I use the term Western supremacist. Then I define what the West is not. It is not black/Asian/Jewish/Muslim. We’ll remove these groups and see what’s left.

We know that there are 3 racial groups: Caucasoids, Mongoloids and Negroids. We know that Mongoloids and Negroids had nothing to do with the development of Western civilization and thus must be repatriated or separated from Western groups. We need to start planning the Reconquista. Three nations have done this: Spain, India and Israel. The Spanish and Indians kicked out their Muslim overlords (India is working on getting rid of the Muslims in their country right now). Israel has kicked out the Muslims and is will soon takeover the West Bank.

Here are the types of cucked Western males who are causing our problems: Catholic Western males who accept black/Asian priests-popes, Christian Zionist males who believe Jews are the chosen and believe in the Rapture, Western males involved with Asian females. and insane, anti-Semitic Western males who blame the Jews for our problems.

The times are changing. 2020 is Year Zero.

Did anybody besides me notice that the gloves came off the anti-white Marxist left during the time Obama was president? I don’t remember such prevalent overt anti-whiteness before 2008, although the bubbling under was getting closer to the surface every year after about 1993. Of course it was in 2016 these fruitloops went off the deep end. But something changed when BO was prez. I think his admin, especially damn Eric Holder, gave a wink and nod to Antifa and black on white crime. Although the Christian-Newsome murders and accompanying media blackout were in 2007.

“I am unaware of any white advocate who has called for the advocacy organizations of others (the NAACP, American Jewish Congress, and the organization formerly known as the National Council of La Raza, etc.) to be shut down.”

Allow me to be one of the first. All three of those organizations (as well as the SPLC, ADL, Rainbow Push, NRI, HRC, ACLU, and others) work in direct opposition to intended US interests and should be abolished and their members expelled from the country.

Instead of “White Supremacist” or “Euro-Zionist,” how about White Egalitarian?

Good list. But “Jewish Supremacist ” is redundant.

90% of North Africans have black ancestry.

I have also read Democracy: The God That Failed and very much like it.

They are our worst enemy.

yep

No one will state a solution in specific, practical, sensible terms. First, because there IS no such solution. Second, everyone here is on a list somewhere.

So you want to be a lickspittle…what a man.

There are more of us whites who know what is going on than most realize. Us whites who are aware keep a low profile due to the volatile atmosphere that we live in. The threat of job loss, real violent threats to our families (that will not be addressed by “the powers that be”) and other considerations keep us from overtly expressing our true feelings on these matters, but the time will come.

Nope. The powers that be will keep the status quo by continuing to threaten with retribution and to offer carrots for good behavior. It has worked so well for so long. There will be eruptions, but they will be effectively suppressed. And, after a while, forgotten.

A generation will grow old and be replaced by unknowing young who will simply follow along in the footsteps of their elders. They have no alternative. The relative social situation will not change.

So long as there is plenty of bread and entertaining circuses. Go Lions, Go Tigers. Pass the beer, please.

And those who rule, who cannot be criticized, will continue to do so, year after year. Until they pass away. Then their children will take their place. Just as they have before.

Heredity determined who rules. And who inherits. Wash, rinse, repeat. It’s almost Darwinian.

Unless the legal environment changes, of course. The old legal environment favored those who are now successful. A new legal environment might favor someone else. Even someone deplorable.

I have decided to accept reality – white supremacy is necessary for the survival of Western Civilization – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2019/08/white-supremacy-is-it-time-to-face.html?m=0 – see if you don’t agree.
The post linked above in my library is just the introduction, the link in that opens up a motherlode of articles by various authors on WC.
It’s time for all of us to face reality or fold our tent and die!

If the zionist puppet Trump gets a second term, he will go for our guns, here is a statement he made on 2-28-18, take the guns first , go through due process second, Trump is a latent gun grabber, and when we loose our guns, the bolshevik demon-rats will come for us in the same way in happened in the Soviet Union.

The author never states that all devil-words are misapplied.
I think you have wandered onto the wrong BB!

Thank you for keeping these horrors in view. Capitalism is an ‘answer’ in that once one admits the superior efficiency of capitalism one removes the most common rationale for communist atrocities. But now we have to confront a new rationale involving racial justice.

To Solzhenitzyn’s point: Evolution would reward a race or strain that behaved altruistically in the manner described. That people don’t behave this way shows something or other, but I couldn’t tell you what it is just yet.

Nobody is going to be jailed (one hopes) for complaining about the government of Illinois putting Ayers and Dohrn on the public payroll. So why can’t we at least do that much? Not on Unz but in writing or even in person to our elected representatives. March right into their office and present a petition for Ayers’ official condemnation and removal from the payroll. The only time Ayers was publicized was when it was helpful to John McCain’s campaign to do so, and McCain himself seemed to be opposed to actually DOING something about Ayers’ sinecure at the taxpayer-supported school.
(Not to mention former Black Panther “Defense Minister” Bobby Rush, who sits in congress.)

The right is SOOOOO pathetic. We are incapable of lifting a finger other than to kvetch, as I am doing now. Do we deserve what we get?

Well, the white term is not working. It is being used and abused by the Zion rulers of the west. So another term based on geography is needed. Color terms should not be applied for people.

European, North African and West Asian people are the Caucasian people.

Perhaps North Sea/Mediterranean people might be a good term. NSM people could be the shorten version of this long title.

North Sea would take in Northern Europe and Mediterranean would take in Southern Europe, West Asia and North Africa.

Asian is the term for East Asian people. South Indian is the term for South Indian people. African is the term is for African people. Native American is the term for Native Americans.

Caucasian, you are right, only names a tiny area of the North Sea/ Mediterranean race.

Thanks for the recommendation. I have read Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s “Democracy: The God That Failed” and I fully agree with his premises and conclusions so, I may check it out for comparative purposes.

2) No indication of how many new comments from last visiting the site?

I noticed that as well, Geo.

It’s radical leftists and non-whites who are the supremacists. Dems & non-whites R the real supremacists!

But the Jewish led left and non-whites demand that whites forfeit all of their wealth, power and “privilege” and submit to their morally superior rule. They want to rule over us not the other way around. If that’s not supremacy then whites desiring to live only among their own people certainly isn’t.

The term “deficiency” will nicely encapsulate so many extreme shortcomings of the whitey’s human character; Greed, Shamelessness, Hubris, Promiscuity, Psychopathy, Inebriation, Immorality, Bloodlust, Pagan Godlessness, Hypocrisy, etc.

and if I didn’t want to be ruled (as if) by someone like you..

they’d call me a ‘white supremacist’.

2) No indication of how many new comments from last visiting the site?

It’s not just yourself. I’ve been experiencing this (ie no new comments notification) too. Other stuff is working though.

Every one of those sickening shitheads in the picture SHOULD be executed. They are our worst enemy. Besides, they say they deserve it. We should give it to them.

As clueless as bitterly clinging boobus Americanus is, in one way his instinct is serving him well: don’t give up those guns.

Sure, the queers and cucks dancing at the globohomo disco are willing to grab deplorables by the pussy, but among all the white western countries, only “US Citizens” still have their weapons in a meaningful fashion.

What happens with this Manchurian Trump gun grab is critical for the rest of the world. This is probably the only sense that I am rooting for “the Yankees”.

European Caucasians would be good term. Other terms could could be devised. This white term is demonizing and real terrorizing term on innocents used by our rulers.

Only dumb Uglo-Suckson Christians refer to White Europoid people as “Caucasians”. Comes from the Bible. White people have nothing to do with anyone from the Caucasus! Armenians are a weird mix of Urartu and Iranians, Azeris are Turks, Georgians are their own thing, and Alans are the last remnant of the Aryans of Ukraine/Kazakhstan mostly genocided by Attila and Batu.

The previous PetrOldSack comments at this thread went gently into the night. Reassuring. Granular editing, some jerks hard at work. No algorithms at play there but blunt human ingerence. Suggestions of what their policy is, missing.

Well….hehehe…..that means you are doing something right here.

You mean what’s the policy of this pub’s “crew”?
I have a feeling you know it. Just…hehe..keep it private. Or…hahaha….it will be more of those “going gently into the dark”.

European Caucasians would be good term. Other terms could could be devised. This white term is demonizing and real terrorizing term on innocents used by our rulers.

Since you seem to be a person who would perhaps approve of the opposite catch-all phrase, “people of colour,” how about we settle for “people of deficiency,” for your kind?

The term “deficiency” will nicely encapsulate so many extreme shortcomings of the whitey’s human character; Greed, Shamelessness, Hubris, Promiscuity, Psychopathy, Inebriation, Immorality, Bloodlust, Pagan Godlessness, Hypocrisy, etc.

Another article – another pile of rubbish about “evil Stalin” and “cultural Marxism”. Right after admitting that communism was a common devil word in the past century! Has any non-German Westerner ever given any arguments against Stalinism, an ideology that made Russia a space-faring nation?

Pagan godlessness?

Read the Talmud and then get back to me about pagan godlessness. Do not read the cabalah. I want to be sporting.

90 percent of the literature of the ancient world has been consigned to darkness thanks to the Jews and Muslims. Who are you to judge the Greco-Romans?

‘But what if it turns out that whites really are racially superior to the others? In that case, there could be such a thing as a benevolent ‘supremacy’ over the colored races by the whites, as in old Rhodesia. Then you’d have justice without (exact) reciprocity.’

It will always end in resentment. This is why the alt-right is for self determination for all peoples.

Other than that excellent comment.

Those people are mostly Jeremy Clarkson, and I claim my £5.
This is peak Boomer uniform, even Phil Collins isn’t this scruffy.
Any White Man over 30 wearing denim is either a petty criminal, or an homosexual. Often both.

You raise a good question. White nationalism ‘will have you’ in the sense that there is nothing to stop you from contributing ideas, time, or money and most will appreciate your efforts, though WN predictably attracts a number of primitives who will insist on disliking you. As for organized white nationalist politics, there is none of any significance that I know about. If there are “underground cells” they don’t seem to be accomplishing much beyond providing something for sybaritic ‘hate-fighting’ groups to point to when fund-raising.

However, there is a genuine issue about what policy white nationalism should take toward Jewish friends. Jared Taylor thinks of Jews as whites and craves Jews in his organization. Others think Jews should be kept out. There is a long history of right-wing movements or groups being co-opted by Jews. Sometimes they invite Jews into leadership positions so they can point to them as proving the movement is not anti-Semitic. This is a passive and self-defeating strategy.

As I see it, a fair part of the WN constituency consists of cultural reactionaries who are put off by the social radicalism and anti-clericalism of most secular Jews. While individual Jews may share the agenda of a WN group they are unlikely to yearn for a return to Christian hegemony. (Certainly there are exceptions.) WN can seem an attractive movement to a cultural reactionary precisely because it excludes Jews and thereby removes the chief source of social radicalism, even if younger white nationalists have already been tainted by Frankfurt School conditioning in the schools and the media.

The key issue is this: The right is crippled by inability to discuss the role of self-conscious Jewish advocacy and influence by typically secular but ‘culturally Jewish’ individuals or groups such as ADL or AIPAC. An important part of political combat consists in negatively characterizing the goals and motives of the opponents, and this activity is taboo where Jews are concerned. Jewish journalists can call out other groups by name and stereotype them when they find them engaged in ‘hate’, ‘racism’ or ‘anti-Semitism’ e.g. whites, ‘born-again bigots’, ‘snooty’ WASPs, ‘rigid’ Irish Catholics/the Catholic church (Jewish historian Melvyn Leffler alludes to Senator Joe McCarthy’s Irish-Catholic upbringing when explaining his unreasonable hostility to Communism), Muslims/Radical Islam, ‘rednecks’ or southern crackers, hateful Poles, or even blacks, but their opponents are never allowed to call them out, which is a great disadvantage. Political argument requires seeing the pattern in events and if the pattern is one of Jews promoting a pet cause or doing ‘what’s good for the Jews’ it may be helpful to call this to the public’s attention.

Many Jews would say these asymmetrical rules of engagement are necessary to prevent anti-Semitism from spiraling into another Holocaust, but the other groups can reply that if Jews speaking as Jews do not want to be criticized as Jews they should refrain from some of their more aggressive criticisms of others. An accusation of hate as in ‘[boycotting Disney] ‘would only confirm [the Baptists’] image as drooling preachers of hate’ or ‘anti-Semitism is mother’s milk to Poles’ may itself be an instance of hate. “I can criticize your sort of person, but you can’t criticize mine” seems too much to ask. After all, preventing another Holocaust is not the ONLY political value for most gentiles, and Jews need to consider whether scolding and censorship is their most promising strategy.

So, the question of whether a WN or culturally reactionary movement should welcome Jews might be answered by asking whether particular Jews are okay with the need to discuss Jewish power.

Alternatively, a policy of excluding Jews as a class would be unfair to individuals, yet might be selected for the same reason that one might wish to disallow gay men as a class from leading Boy Scout troops.

The BDS issue is interesting in that one finds Jews and Muslims on the pro-BDS side but not many Christians. This is not just because Christians lately tend to be pro-Israel, but also because criticism of Israel is simply inconceivable to most Christians, in that it invites a fatal accusation of anti-Semitism. Is this assumption weakening, and if so is that a good thing?

That is because they have been brainwashed by the globalist ideological propaganda currently in force and cannot see clearly. People have been equally brainwashed in the past by other ideologies to their detriment. This will come to pass. But how and what will replace it isn’t yet clear.

Don’t forget “white trash”…

There are plenty of other terms that I could have mentioned, such as “holocaust-denier” and “xenophobe”, etc. However, I did not cite them because either they are not generic or not often deployed through the mass media, so that common people do not tend to use them reflexively, as a blanket accusation, based on their prior conditioning.

When was the last time, if ever, you heard the term “white-trash” uttered repeatedly in a derogatory manner on television? Besides, based on a recent best-selling book (2016), White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America, tends to refer to descendants in the southern U.S. from ancestors who came to settle in America from the British Isles, but not the European mainland.

Likewise, the term “holocaust-denier” is used only in specific instances, to disparage those people who have openly expressed skepticism or ridicule pertaining to the exaggerated Jewish victim narrative from three quarters of a century ago – during a very brief period within what has been referred to as The Jewish Century, according to a book title (2006) by a UC-Berkeley professor.

It’s a hate-generating term and is designed and used for that specific purpose. It can be so to speak hurled and will terminate discussion. It is used by people who enjoy the power of the lie.

The prime currency of any ineducable purple-haired, nose-ringed genetic disaster area otherwise known as “woke”, “feminist”, or “SJW” has been the “thought-terminating cliché”.
Since 2012 (that’s when it started to really get up my nose, at least).

Thank your parents that you are not a boring Jew/zionist.

And, what would you owe them for lovingly holding your hands and leading you down the path of pagan godlessness?

“stop whining” and “state your solution”

No one will state a solution in specific, practical, sensible terms. First, because there IS no such solution. Second, everyone here is on a list somewhere. So why move up on that dawn-raid list by specifying a putative, unrealistic solution? As some poet wrote, just be continually drunk – on wine, poetry, or virtue. For me, this website helps with the “virtue” part.

White Nationalists are not White Supremacists. They fall between White Separatists (only want to live with white people) and White Supremacists (WS want an all or predominantly “white” nation, which I assume means people with a bloodline that originates from within the inner Hajnal line).

That some people are intentionally confusing these three groups is not coincidental, as there’s hardly enough White Supremacists to fill a high-school football stadium.

If “we” grant a psychological war between the races* then a sustained desire for Supremacy will be the deciding factor.

Desire for Supremacy just is the essential psychological separation. And separation just is the benign solution to a “closing of the gap” necessary to primitive violence.

A true totalitarian understands the above, instinctively, and so coercive integration comes natural to him. The chaos that ensues, namely, the self-annihilation of a “race” of people, inherently predictable.

*In the white world, your race is your father(s).

Can’t prove this suspicion, of course, but it has the timing and feel of an artificially created blitz with this as its slogan.

That’s good to hear, because it absolutely is, and your feeling the need to comment on it means many others are… Noticing things, also.

Agree

Thank you, FLgeezer

Is it just me or are others recently experiencing s/w issues with UR:

1) No reply button to PG’s Jeffrey Epstein RIP?
2) No indication of how many new comments from last visiting the site?
3) contributors’ comments like this one not highlighted in yellow?

Do not feed the Jewish troll.

‘This sounds like a rationalization of his actions.

Never mind that about half the people he killed were white, not Hispanic.’

Which came first dickhead?

Well, the Weather Underground types of the late 60’s and early 70’s have since that time by and large taken over the US Democratic party it would seem. Disregarding Nietzsche and others warnings about becoming the very thing you proclaim to be fighting, hatred consumes these people’s very being.

They have murder in their hearts.

Larry Grathwohl reported that Bill Ayers of the Weathermen had told him that after ‘the revolution’ they would have to ‘eliminate’ (ie kill) twenty-five million people in the United States as they could not be re-educated.

The 1970’s full on embracing of the Jim Jones cult by the radical left (not to mention a number of prominent ‘mainstream’ Dem party members) right up to their mass suicide at Jonestown via cyanide laced kool aid in 1979 fits right in with this.

That the Weathermen readily self-identified with the Manson family after their murderousness came to light in 1969 certainly says something as well.

Twisted, deranged, and dangerous, doesn’t even begin to do service in describing the mentality that has evolved within these folks.

‘Dig it! First they killed those pigs. Then they ate dinner in the same room with them. Then they even shoved a fork into the pig Tate’s stomach! Wild!’

Dohrn was criticized for comments she made about the murders of actress Sharon Tate and retail store owners Leno and Rosemary LaBianca by the Charles Manson clan. In a speech during the December 1969 “War Council” meeting organized by the Weathermen, attended by about 400 people in Flint, Michigan, Dohrn said, “First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, then they even shoved a fork into the pig Tate’s stomach! Wild!” In greeting each other, delegates to the war council often spread their fingers to signify the fork.[10]

That’s not to say Capitalism is the answer to this, as like it’s closely paralleling sister Communism, it’s anti-life as well.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn in his life had dealt with this sort of thing. It only stands to reason he might have something to say.

Namely, in the short term, people have their refusal..

‘how we burned in the camps’

And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?

Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?…

The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…

We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernardine_Dohrn

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/10420.Aleksandr_Solzhenitsyn

‘But anyone who reads to the comments of the White Trashionalists here will see that it really is a terrible ideology.

The fortunate truth is that they represent merely the bottom decile of white quality’

Nice stab at objectivity there schlomo. You are stupid and crazy for organising in your interests when evrybody else is White man.

Lol.

What a dolt.

‘Euro-zionism’

Zionism has failed. If you are comparing todays White ethno-nationalism with todays Zionism then let me be clear: They are not the same thing. Zionism is based around stealing other peoples land and parasitising White civilisation. I can understand the expediancy of using the term but let me be clear they are not the same.

The previous PetrOldSack comments at this thread went gently into the night. Reassuring. Granular editing, some jerks hard at work. No algorithms at play there but blunt human ingerence. Suggestions of what their policy is, missing.

Before grammar and syntax is Capitalization.

If (s)upremacy…

Cause: (S)upremacy.

What is objective Supremacy?

And what does one call a white man who believes in and therefore strives towards objective Supremacy?

Our MSM doesn’t mention Black Sea Slavery or Barbary Coast Slavery for some odd reason. The origins of the word Slave comes for the word Slav because of Black Sea Slav slavery.

https://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/rs/bitstream/10086/14906/1/chichukai0001801710.pdf

Here is a bit about how the Crimean Tartar Slav trade.

Page 13 of Eizo Matsuki’s paper about Slav slaves hunting by Crimean Tartars

As many scholars recognize the slave trade was the most important basis for the Crimean Tatar economy in the 16th and 17th centuries. During these centuries, the Crimean Khanate remained the main supplier of Slavic slaves, almost all of which were captured in southern Poland or Muscovite Russia, and brought back to the Crimea by their raiders. Most of their raids seemed neither to have had any military purpose, nor politico-territorial ambitions. The taking of captives and the selling them as slaves for the Crimean Tatars was purely an “economic” activity. R. Hellie refers to the Crimean Tatar’s raiding activities as their “industry”: “Slave raiding into Muscovy reached crisis proportions after 1475, when the Ottomans took over the Black Sea slave trade from the Genoese and the Crimean began slave raiding as a major industry, especially between 1514 and 1654.”18

The El Paso “shooting” is a complete hoax. Its part of the warfare on white, Christian America, to take their guns. Wake up white America!

#ElPasoStrong #ElPasoTerroristAttack "Hero" Christopher Grant throwing bottles at a shooter with an AR-15?🤔Bottles in the produce section? Chips also in the produce section of Walmart? pic.twitter.com/AOvmq5cs3E

— The Ghost of Sobran (@auntietermite) August 17, 2019

Define 'duping delight'https://t.co/fdzjrDyogg pic.twitter.com/yA4xegmU0B

— Jeff DeRiso (@JeffDeRiso) August 4, 2019

The problem is you, as I also born an American/Irish Catholic became an atheist/Buddhist/whatever etc., have/had no idea what the Traditional Catholic Church was and taught–you had no proper Catechism or upbringing in the true faith to really learn it. Zio-Christians are not Christianity. Vatican 2 was instituted by infiltrated in Masons/Satanists (Archbishop Bugnini was a high level Mason and exiled to Iran at the end when it was indisputable– he gave the Church the Masonic “Novus Ordo Mass” basically– trashing the Traditional Latin Mass God gave the Saints for us. Cardinal Baggio who picked most of the Bishops for many, many years (Modernists/Homos etc.) was also outed as a high level Mason and exiled to the Vatican Post Office finally after so much damage done (the Church was flooded in the Clergy with Masons/Communists–Communist Bella Dodd stated she participated in putting over 1,000 Communists in as “Priests” alone — if not Satanists ala revelations recently as to Cardinal Bernardin who was the most powerful Cardinal in the USA for many years and now is credibly accused of participation in 2 Black Masses as an infiltrated in Satanist and homopredator) — much insider knowledge was recently exposed by Father Charles Murr in a book titled The Godmother which is his eyewitness account at the time of the people at the very top of the Vatican when all this damage was being done in the 1960s-70s leading to what we have today in “Pope” Francis and the homo/Masonic Bishops etc…

The majority of mass shooting in America are by blacks.

But don’t let facts get in the way of your ignorant rants.

Extremism on the left needs to be countered by extremism on the right if for no other reason than that people in the middle need to be able to say they are rejecting extremists on both sides.

IOW there’s a middle ground that probably sympathize with one side or the other but which isn’t going to do anything. When the war is over they’ll adapt to the philosophy of the winning side.

For instance Western middle classes have adapted to the post WW2 victory of Jewish leftism (and in fact sustain it). This (mostly white) middle class has basically adopted a non-negotiable religious style leftist package with its interlocking set of views on gun control (removal), multiculturalism, LGBT, free immigration, anti-Christianism, free sexuality, feminism plus a selection of taboo subjects such as 9/11.

It’s not a pick and choose. If you want to be invited to the dinner parties, the whole package is required. It even has its own counter-cultural dress code – formal jacket & worn blue jeans.

One should immediately distrust any writer who depends on devil terms: he wants to manipulate his readers, not inform or reason with them.

I would agree but with an emphasis on the word depends. In politics, I don’t think people are under any obligation to be objective all the time and I think it’s perfectly fine to employ some charged language and terms of derision (sometimes derision is warranted!), though thoughtful writers will do so selectively. There is a place for a wide range of approaches: objective, emotional, aggressive, mocking, etc.

What I hate about the left is that they use it in all contexts and deny that they are doing it. The SPLC and ADL will smear people and then the media will quote them authoritatively on the matter, as will government agencies. Likewise, even the most blatant propaganda and pseudo-scholarship is permitted in our universities.

It would not be easy to defend the dictionary definition of white supremacism either, because it contradicts the principle of reciprocity that is an essential component of justice. If such “white supremacists” actually existed, they would be advocating the selfish exploitation of others, which they could neither defend nor agree to if imposed on themselves.

A wrinkle here is that it is non-whites who are demanding it. The last thing they want is true independence from the white man.

What people like Devlin need to provide their readers is a strategic analysis of the enemy with recommendations for fighting him effectively

They can’t. Especially the later. Not good enough. Not enough expertise and experience in related matters. Not much desire to do that either, IMHO.

Hehe….BTW…..do you really think this site would exist if you were to find that here?

This is an online pub. It’s for customer socializing and venting. And for the owner and the bartenders/servers staff ………..anyway.

… and let’s not forget:

war on terror – it is a war over territory, resources, and economic control

the good war – a war to destroy germany

the war to end all wars – first attempt to destroy germany

war over slavery (it was a war over taxes – read abe lincoln’s first innaugural address)

in short

‘white supremacy’ is a pejorative for any white person who doesn’t want to be ruled by non-whites

Charles Martel was the ultimate white supremacist, for simply not wanting Europe (and France in particular) to be ruled by non-whites.

Today all white people are expected to want to be ruled by non-whites (non-racists, as only whites can be racist).

Any white person who doesn’t want to be ruled by non-whites; is a ‘white supremacist’.

For the record.

If you don’t want to be called a ‘white supremacist’, it’s very easy. Simply assume this position, and you’ll get a pat on the head. ‘Good white, good white.

Superb as usual Rurik. Thank you.

Look, I Obey my Jews, love my Negroes, and hate myself. Please let me keep my job

Hehehe….perfect.
Thanks.

if the demon-rats aka bolsheviks have their way, we here in America will suffer the same fate!

a running mantra of mine is that you can glimmer a thousand times more by what people don’t say, than by the words they speak.

And every horrific crime committed by their pets, against Whites, is proof positive of what the J-supremacists motivating principles are.

When Travon or Michael Brown or some other thug gets righteously plugged, they screech hysterically about what they don’t like. (one of their pets being put down like a mangy dog).

But if a persona non grata (white goyim) is subjected to horrors unimaginable (Channon Christian , Wichita massacre, et al, ad nauseam), we can see right into ((their)) ids by the thunderous sound of silence.

When a pretty girl is raped and fed to alligators by their pets, they like it. Because if they didn’t like it, they would report it.

So we all have a perfect metric for understanding exactly ((their)) motivating principles.

If something happens (or even if it didn’t even happen), that they don’t like, they screech like a raped banshee 24/7. (Travon “murder”!, Duke “rapists!”, Brett Kavanaugh “assaults!”, Jussie Smalet “attack”).

But when things happened that they like, (Channon Christian/Christopher Newsom torture/murders) it’s crickets. No one beyond the local community will even have heard of it.

So just as they lied about the Kulaks being genocided by the millions, we know they liked that. And so insofar as they even reported it, they lied about it.

And by that metric, so too when our time comes, there will be silence, and quiet smiles of glee.

There are people believing in white supremacy. But they are few and far between. In terms of importance, the problem of white supremacists won’t even make it into the top-100 in the US in 2019. But it’s a convenient strawman for liars.

NYT editor inadvertently said something approaching truth: Russiagate BS is spent, let’s switch to White Supremacy BS. Since NYT and their ilk promotes these lines of BS, it is only natural that both are lies.

And another thing: Quibbling about the word ‘Supremacy’ doesn’t alter the fact that there is a significant, if suppressed, white nationalist movement whose adherents do in fact think the white race needs to band together and defeat the other races to the extent that they threaten its (former?) hegemony in the West. Tucker Carlson is lying or ignorant (much as I love him.) The white movement is potentially a very good thing. Extremism on the left needs to be countered by extremism on the right if for no other reason than that people in the middle need to be able to say they are rejecting extremists on both sides. Otherwise the people in the middle become the right and the ‘new normal’ is moved to the left. When the left gets the idea that its only opponents are milquetoasts, it proceeds accordingly.

The second and third highest polling Democrats, Warren and Sanders are abject white haters. They can’t stop talking about their hatred of white people. If it were not for anti-white, whites…they wouldn’t have a chance. When the SHTF the anti-white, whites must be the first dealt with.

A century or two ago, the British Empire was run by ‘white supremacists.’ They did exist, then. they felt they had some divine destiny, etc.
Clearly, they have not existed for quite along time. I don’t believe or I am not aware of having ever met one.
But, Real Liars from Hell do enjoy using this term.
It’s a hate-generating term and is designed and used for that specific purpose. It can be so to speak hurled and will terminate discussion. It is used by people who enjoy the power of the lie.

What a stupid article. Devlin doesn’t make a single point that his readers haven’t heard and affirmed a hundred times. And, like that lunkhead Sean Hannity, he seems to think the goal of political advocacy is to convict the opponent of … hypocrisy!!

To which the opponents will say, a la Walt Whitman: Do I contradict myself? Very well, I contradict myself!

I am reminded of the poem “Spider and the Fly” by Don Marquis. A spider has captured a fly and the fly pleads for his life. At the end of the narrative the fly wishes he had “a better line of talk” to which the spider replies, “the end of our conversation would have been exactly the same” and proceeds to eat him.

What people like Devlin need to provide their readers is a strategic analysis of the enemy with recommendations for fighting him effectively. Crying in one’s beer is less productive than watching another baseball game, which at least provides relaxation.

This W supremacy thing is the new Isis, Israel Secret Intelligence Service, and Al-Qaeda, the toilet in Arabic. It is a joke, a sheep herding tactic and nothing more than that.

How can little people of any type be supremacists?

Supreme means having the greatest power or authority. No little W people have any great power or authority.

Who were the 25 people who lived within a few blocks of each other that pushed for war on Iraq in 2003?

Those are the people that our lovely MSM should look at and shout at them – Supremacists!

Who pushed for the attack on Libya?

B-H Levy was the main instigator for it. What Supremacy background does he have?

Who are endless promoting war on Iran? What nations? US, Britain and Israel. Who are the main instigators in those nations?

These instigators are Supremacists? Our MSM should take the names of these Supremacists if we had a real “free” press”.

Who pushes Russiagate endlessly?

Supremacists who hate any nation free of the Supremacy of the Zion rulers of the West. Take the names of these Supremacists.

We are now living in an illogical, irrational, and fantasy world of our Zion rulers.

This long-winded article could be compressed in 2-3 points.

1. in modern world, national are primary loyalties. Nations are a compound of history, language, territory, common will & identity..basically, extended family. See French, Danes, Russians, Hungarians, Japanese..

2. there is no multiracial nation. Mixed countries like US, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Singapore…do not constitute a nation. In multiracial societies, racial & ethnic groups are true nations, even in case they share common language & some common culture.

3. in the US, however diverse they may be among themselves, blacks are sort of nation. So are whites, with much more diversity.

4. American historical nation is only one, white English speaking people belonging to Western culture. Two other big groups (blacks and American Indians) are national minorities (or group of minorities).

5. nowhere in the earth would any nation (belonging to any race) would let be swamped by alien ethnic/racial groups that differ from them, and permanently so. That goes for Japanese, Russians, Finns, Italians, Israelis, Vietnamese, Iranians… and Americans, I mean national Americans- would not either. If they are woke enough & not suicidal idiots unlike virtually all people on planet earth.

Don’t forget “white trash”, which is a blanket devil term that implies the rest of it.
Poor whites have been shit on for a long time.

>paraphrases shooter’s expressly written motivation for his actions

Your response: “Be careful goy, you don’t want to be seen justifying his actions, do you?”

And you wonder why people hate you?

The endgame is censorship. All you need is to gag someone is to label him or her a ‘white supremacist’, ‘far-right’, KKK, etc.

The current online purge driven mostly by the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League refers.

“I’m actually awed by just how clever our foes actually are. I honestly believe there is some organizational structure that coordinates and rolls out these new buzzwords and concepts. There seems to be a strategic coherence to it all.” (good observation by Anonymous)

The editorial board of the Associated Press meets every day to create the news “headlines” that will be force fed to the hungry gullible ones. Throw in the DNC or whatever. Darn if you don’t find a preponderance of left wing Ashkenazis in there. Mr. Unz and myself were born into this ethnic group but don’t share the political persuasion I dare say.
Brown University admitted and awarded me with a degree in 1963 when it was still a traditional institution of higher learning. My alma mater is now a leading purveyor of diversity delusionism.
I will do what I can to support the cause of white nationalism if that cause will have me.

The antecedent of “its” is “scapegoating,” referring to today’s practice. I could have been clearer, however.

It’s not only unfair, it’s false.

You are falling for the trap. It’s not a race issue. It’s an ECONOMIC issue.

If the Canadians were storming the borders and living for free off the labors of the white working class, a murderous blowback would be directed their way.

Understand this: There is not an unlimited pie. For every job, every university spot, every grant, every SNAP card, that an individual is given by our treasonous government that has not paid into the system (indeed nor have his /her family)

– a white working class American loses. They lose jobs, education, assistance, loans- finite resources.

To ask any native population to accept that abhorrent state of affairs is to ask them to sign their own extinction plan. Who would advocate that? And why?

The elephant in the room here:

All these “white supremacist, neo-Nazi, devil words” are enabled by the proven fraud commonly called the “holocaust”.

Cast aside the impossible ‘6M Jews, 5M others & gas chambers’ and those words have little power.

Say what you like, but until then, nothing will change.

May 24, 2019 Understanding Our Slavery – How Organized Crime Runs Government and Media

The Freestate project and The Prestate Project.

The vast majority of the people they are talking about are white separatists, not supremacists. They use the term supremacist because if they used the accurate term separatist they would have to explain to the mass of white sheep the negatives of separatism and the value of becoming a hated minority in a country built by your ancestors. The value of being in effect a slave working to support peoples and institutions who hate and exploit you. The desirability of diversity over all other values like your traditional freedoms, such as those embedded in the First and Second Amendments, you can have one or the other, but not both. Selling the Gulag to its future victims, tough sell.

Author ,while understandably trying to put forward some historical examples as usually brings the wrong one, because he is writing about things he does not know about. As usually Soviet union experience is brought to bear. Firstly, “кулак” – kulak, was a term describing village loan sharks. Not as some try to depict them as strong hard working peasants but local parasites or as they were called “мироеды” – ” miroedy or community eaters as мир in Russian means both peace and community. They were lending mostly various crop production related items from horse to seeds at humungous interest rates and then also using their influence over many people owing them due to poverty for own benefits on village meetings. When collectivization started in earnest, kulaks quite literally atarter losing their livelihood and resorted to violent methods. It is in criminal records. Thus as a class enemies they had to be dealt with and often they were dealt by peasants themselves who hated their guts.
Regarding famines. Russia suffered rolling famines for hundred years, however locals always concentrate on basically the last famine that happened. What they fail to notice that there was no more famines after the last one safe 1947 right after the war. Situation that was before peasant and agricultural question was solved was not sustainable and Soviet un up on plainly had no option to continue being backward peasant country if Russia was to survive. Problems accumulated over hundred years and had to be resolved in the most expeditious manner due to international situation especially.
Soviet union indeed was a workers paradise, albeit later generation taking everything for granted was not realizing this until all was lost. Currently Russia just like the rest of the world is workers hell. What is paradise anyway? Is it constant gratification of various wishes and desires or it is stability, confidence in tomorrow, lack of suffering and spiritual and cultural development. Any wonder that workers and peasants who knew the difference between what was before and under Soviet power fought during great patriotic war like Russians frankly never fought before against the most formidable foe. Now, population of the world is 7+ billion and growing. Anyone who believes that tte world can afford division on wealthy and the rest with the rest living decent lives is wrong. The whole social capitalism in the west was only allowed because there was Soviet union and the moment Soviet union dissolved the whole social state in the west started being g dismantled and look at what is new reality everywhere. It is far cry from 3040 years ago when USSR existed and situation up on us getting worst by a year whi lo e wealthy accumulate more and more the rest work harder and get poorer. Every single down trend in the world has its start exactly from the moment of the Soviet experiment end including white race troubles discussed here. It is a real food for thought.

May 09, 2017 How Higher Education Became an Obscenely Profitable Racket That Enriches the Few at the Expense of the Many (Student Debt-Serfs)

Student loan lenders are skimming tens of billions in profits guaranteed by the taxpayers.

http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2017/05/how-higher-education-became-obscenely.html

Nov 9, 2010 Public “Education” has become indoctrination and distraction

People are not being educated they’re being tested for levels of obedience. School is about memorizing what you are told short term and repeating it. The bulk of how you are graded is by completely daily busy work. This is for the work force the most important quality in a worker bee actually is obedience.

The very word “Hate” itself, as it is used by the hostile elite, also has supernatural, occult-like quality that has a supernatural function.

Agreed. Ditto “systemic racism,” “instiutional racism,” “white privilege,” “power structures,” and anything that’s described as “_______ophobia.”

All these terms are just lazy ways to avoid having to actually analyze or prove any individual case. It’s so much easier to simply use a term that implies that an evil forcefield is holding back your group.

The one reason that makes jews so successful is that they formulate and enact laws (civil-rights for some) that deny us whites the right to look after our own self-interest while they flout the laws that are imposed on the rest of us. THAT, my friend is a reason for their “success”.

A good example of jewish flouting of “civil-rights” laws is the jewish community of Kiryas Joel, New York, among others. If you are not jewish, you cannot buy property there, nor can you send your non-jewish children to the (jews-only) public schools.

You see, “multiculturalism and diversity for thee, but not for me” is the jewish mantra and is the primary way that they destroy cultures and civilizations. Their lack of morality figures heavily into their success. Jews think nothing of screwing over a “goy”; it is just “normal business” for them…

Jews are the only group that lacks a moral component. Jews are very amoral, think nothing of screwing a “goy” out of money, possessions, or even reputation or life. You see, the jewish talmud elevates the jew above all others, “goyim” being “livestock with souls, created only to serve the jew”.
This amorality is a critical component in jewish life and is partially responsible for jewish successes. When one does not possess a moral compass that defines and separates “right from wrong” THAT in itself gives the jew greater latitude to “get what he wants” as there are “no limits” on what a jew may do to gain the advantage in just about any situation. The lack of a moral component within jewish life is a major reason for jewish supremacy in civilized societies.

It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”.

This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites. Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more.

As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”. Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, even bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.

Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.

At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise.

A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.

Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew”, and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.

Devil terms allow the powerful to victimize the innocent precisely through their failure to denote any specific, objectively definable class of people.

.

That happens in every human group (the gambling place where I went, after I didn’t do the “submissive salute” to the head of the pack for a while, saw most gamblers notice that when I was there they lost much more than in my absence… thus making them feel clean as they made it impossible for me to continue going there, in other words did what their nature made them want to do: follow the will of the pack head).

Devil terms allow the powerful, who are few (only one at times) and the bulk of groups who are neither innocent nor powerful but are ablaze with desire to go against the innocent and act the powerful’s orders, to do what they want to do with a patina of morality.

Now, what columnist would write it as it is, and he know it is? One who wouldn’t like to have a readership I guess.

Agree, and some books on this are The Gulag Archipelago by Solzhenitsyn and Harvest of Sorrow by Robert Conquest and if the demon-rats aka bolsheviks have their way, we here in America will suffer the same fate!

Agree, a good book is The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed and The Committee of 300 by John Coleman and he has videos on youtube.

Terms came from facts/intentions, they don’t create them.
If a racial demographic who could easily not tolerates being bullied, there will come, as is a constant in human business, the terms to rationalise, justify, and present it in a light counter to what it actually is.

Instead of focusing on how it is presented and rationalised, one could focus on the fact that almost all of the bullied enjoy their bullying as a group.
Yes, the point made is, I assume, that they are made to enjoy their own bullying, individually and racially, through sly use of terms, such as “White Supremacy”.
But again, like hypnosis (whereto they are closely related), words help people and groups do what they already want to do.

Even if true at least they can figure out toilets, unlike the bottom of your people.

“Since the dawn of time, the archenemies of civilization have been plundering humanity with their moneymaking trickery.

These learned Persians, Herodotus says, maintain that the instigators of the world-wide East-West conflict are neither the Greeks nor the Persians, but instead a third people, the Phoenicians, peripatetic merchants. It was they who first began the business of kidnapping women, which in turn triggered this global storm.

Conditions sound similar? He’s talking about The Iliad; I’m talking about the Nakba, now taking place in Europe and the United States. So you see? Like our friends the Palestinians, the entire white race is now being displaced, generally by being bred out of the herd, by the light brown minions of Baron Coudenhove-Kalergi’s wet dream of a world superstate.

The world has a very old problem. This same kind of invasion, keyed by sedition and stealth, has continued successfully for, at the very least, twenty four hundred years.”

https://johnkaminski.org/index.php/john-kaminski-american-writer-and-critic-2/222-travels-with-herodotus

Let me get this straight. It’s unfair to call the guy who killed a bunch of Mexicans a “white supremacist” because he was angry that there were Mexicans in the United States?

I know you guys try to relabel yourselves every five years in your hopeless quest to make your dumb ideas seem palatable, so I assume this is another attempt at that played out game.

However, I actually agree with you on this. “White supremacist” is too vague a term when we have much more apt monikers to go by. I prefer “worthless white pieces of shit” myself, but I would not argue against the more concise”racist dipshits.”

Just as long as you remember that no one likes you.

It’s pretty obvious that the whole point of the “White Nationalist” (trade mark) sales pitch is to equate the terms “White Nationalist” with “white supremacist” (which is itself now defined as “terrorist” and/ or “Nazi”) in order to silence any person that happens to be both “white” and a “nationalist”…. As evidenced in the irony of accusing folks like Shapiro of being White Nationalists.

What the left is missing is that by doing so they are likely creating their own self fufilling prophecy by pushing average white people that don’t hate their country or themselves towards the fringes by doing so.

The next few years should be interesting.

Great comment.

I agree that, in one sense, they don’t deserve to be taken seriously.

One reason, among many, is that, as Schopenhauer said of them,

Nothing about Judaism can be confused with Reason.

But, like it or not, they still have lots of power, still hate us, and are still a threat.

We don’t respect criminals, but if we care about the well-being of ourselves and our loved ones we take the threat of their criminal behavior very seriously indeed.

“Anti-white racist” is definitely the term to use, for sure.

Since they use “racism” in such an ill-defined and overbroad way they can’t refute the charge without watering down or contradicting their own term.

That’s why they have invented the super-lame counter-argument that, by definition, “only whites can be racist.”

The response to that, is: “Well, that just proves your an anti-white racist because that’s the most racist thing you could say.”

They’ll sputter and disengage on the ground that they won’t talk to a “white supremacist,” or something. But you’ve won the point.

You guys didnt do yourselves many favors. People who push christianity like it’s a sports team are what made me an atheist. You blindly follow a religion that you mostly dont practice. You dont want abortion to be legal but you waved the flag at football games and supported the troops and killed those “a-rabs” and supported Zionism and just acted like the bootlickers that a jewish inspired religion stripped of all morals would produce.

I am beginning to value “white Christians” more.. since I am Italian and Irish and was raised catholic. I’m a 30 yr old union plumber in NYC who leans communist.

By staying away from echo chambers i am now valuing family, moral Christian workers, and economic nationalism.

Economic nationalism is leftism

Was “She”ever successfully paper trained by the Whitehouse staff?

“…. because they would dearly like to have supremacy—i.e., unchecked power—over us.”

They already have supremacy over us.

The question we need to put to them, or to ourselves here (the JIDF Trolls will read it and pass it along to the real supremacists) is this;

What is there in the real world that the label “White Supremacy” directs us to locate?

Or, we could put it this way.

What aspect of actual human experience does “White Supremacy” locate and inform us about?

Some would respond by saying, “There’s nothing in the real world that corresponds to the label.”

The counter to this would be the shootings, of course.

But the response to that answer would be that the shootings have a suspicious pattern about them similar to that of The Holocaust, The JFK/RFK/MLK assasinations, The USS Liberty, and September 11th, etc. ie;

1. Destroy the Evidence
2. Control the Narrative
3. Enforce the Law (on anyone who questions the narrative)

Victimize-Blame Victim-Play Victim

And, the sine que non of any real Supremacy,

Having the power to impose and effecuate the insane demands to be

1. Placed Above Criticism
2. Loved Unconditionally (even if they kill your loved ones)
3. Blindly Obeyed

THAT’s how you locate the Supremacists in the real world.

So, for now, “White Supremacy” and related terms, are all definitional.

There are no observables.

Until about 50 years ago, and even, to a lesser extent 30 years ago when I was in college,
the Western tradition taught us that demonstrative knowledge was what separated us from simple animals, makes reason and science possible, and elevates us to a knowledge of ourselves.

No wonder they hate us.

But there’s a snake in their Us Good/Them Bad, anti-White/pro-Non-White PC garden. And it’s this;

When you introduce the inexplicable (“White Supremacy” as they are defining it) into reality you relapse into the supernatural.

If the supernatural is introduced in this one case, what’s stopping it from being introduced into others?

And, in fact, this is what is happening.

It’s a return to a fanatic and barbaric philosophy, or worldview, that explains all facts by attributing them to some mysterious, supernatural causal force (“White Supremacy”, etc) that no one’s allowed to question, let alone examine and analyze.

These mysterious, supernatural causal forces are then used to explain away everything by manufacturing, ad hoc, occult qualities or faculties that function like little demon spirits that do whatever is required of them.

By introducting the inexplicable into our explanations we fall into something way worse than the occult. We give up on all thought and reason itself. The very things that make us human and define our culture.

In other words, the very things that make mutual understanding, personal-interaction and social-management possible.

Instead, by giving up on all thought and reason we open up asylums of ignorance, laziness, stupidity and real hatred. Not the phoney manufactured “Hate” that’s going around now and trying to pass itself off as the ultimate truth that we HAVE to believe in, or else.

The very word “Hate” itself, as it is used by the hostile elite, also has supernatural, occult-like quality that has a supernatural function.

The great innovation of Western Cultural Life is it’s Culture of Individual Conscience as an alternative to the Culture of Blind Obedience to Authority that has obtained in all cultures throughout all of history, with no exception, except that created by European Man.

What is happening now is that the rise of Jewish Supremacy Inc. is heralding in a New Dark Ages of Blind Obedience to their Authority.

The problem is they are imposing this on a world more complex and unpredictable than ever before.

They are motivated by a belief-system that is thousands of years old and no longer corresponds to the world they are dominating now.

That’s why all of us alive today are witnessing The Pyrrhic Victory of Jewish Supremacy.

Yes, it began as a ‘fight against racism’ which the entire system rallied around.

That’s exactly right. The goal used to be for individuals to be judged by “content of character” not skin color. Now advocating a “colorblind” system is itself denounced as “racism.”

It turned out certain groups can’t compete on a level playing field, after all. So the focus shifted overnight from “equal opportunity” for all, to just tearing down evil “white privilege.”

I’m actually awed by just how clever our foes actually are.

On this point, I don’t think they are especially bright. They just own the media and the education system. And the “respectable” right is too cowadly about being called “racist” to fight back. So winning the culture war has been like shooting fish in a barrel for the cultural marxists.